A local story recently came to light and I'd like to throw the pertinent
details out here for your opinions
A local city councilman has a girlfriend who runs a cat rescue called Cats
Haven. She currently houses 200 cats and provides neutering and adoption
services. She works out of a newly constructed barn and has the services of
a local vet to oversee the needs of the animals. Her salary is 36K per
year.Sounds rather expensive, eh? Donations are only a minor part of her
funding. The local newspaper tried to make a big issue of where she gets her
money and came up short of having the smear story they wanted.
The city councilman boyfriend runs a very busy bar downtown. He sells pull
tab tip tickets there which are classed as a form of bingo in Ohio. Since
the benefactor of these sales is a registered charity - Cats Haven - the
whole thing is perfectly legal. The records keeping of the bar and the Cats
haven organization are impeccable, so there is no complaint of violation of
gaming laws or political ethics.
http://www.limaohio.com/lederman/?postid=111
Those who opposed a casino coming to Lima on religious grounds found the
unlikeliest of allies in Lima City Councilman Ray Magnus.
It's really no surprise that Magnus opposed a casino, at least now that
someone has looked into the amount of gambling his bar does. What is
surprising: The people who implied hell awaits those who gamble signed on
with a man responsible for more than $1.45 million worth of gambling in only
12 months.
The woman Magnus has identified to reporters as his fiancée, Marie Daley,
runs the cat shelter that receives profits from the bingo sales at Magnus'
bar. Although the Ohio Attorney General's Office lists Cats Haven, the
holder of the bingo permit, as being in Wapakoneta and the Allen County
Auditor's Office puts it in Cridersville, it actually is in Allen County.
The cat rescue is at a Perry Township home Magnus and Daley own at 6105
McClain Road, across the street from Auglaize County.
The Form 990 for Cats Haven filed with the Internal Revenue Service for 2006
shows she spent more than $295,000 providing care for cats. In 2006, the
Form 990 for Cats Haven shows, bingo brought in more than $298,000.
Tip book expenses, which include paying winners, totaled almost 80 percent
of the money taken in. The reporting periods for the tax returns and the
bingo sales are different, so it would take an office with actual auditing
power to determine if all the reporting is accurate.
Let's assume it is.
Now, reading through the rest of the article, various people have an axe to
grind with Mr.Magnus, Cats Haven, the way some of the money is spent, etc.
Having perused the many articles tha appear on this subject, it is clear the
animals receive over $140,000 in vet care, $290,000 in total care and have a
really good chance at being homed.
If such an operation became succesful in your area, what would your thoughts
be about it?
Wendy - 22 Oct 2007 11:44 GMT
I'd be delighted if our rescue group would be the beneficiary of this type
of operation. We already have gambling in PA so I'd be happy to see some of
that money going to a worthy cause and not just lining someone's pocket.
They brought gambling into this state on the premise that it would be used
to lower property taxes, something that I haven't seen and never expect to
see.
Wendy
>A local story recently came to light and I'd like to throw the pertinent
>details out here for your opinions
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
> If such an operation became succesful in your area, what would your
> thoughts be about it?
RobZip - 22 Oct 2007 13:03 GMT
> I'd be delighted if our rescue group would be the beneficiary of this type
> of operation. We already have gambling in PA so I'd be happy to see some
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Wendy
I detect no surprise in your tone that property taxes didn't actually go
down. The local newspaper, in particular the author of the article cited,
has a dislike for Mr Magnus. He's a bit outside the box that the old line
status quo politicians in the area have so neatly fit for the last several
generations. When the paper got word that tip ticket sales were funding the
Cats Haven operation, the witch hunt was on. The investigation was expected
to turn up some form of fiscal mismanagement, diversion of funds, etc. When
nothing irregular turned up and in fact, nearly every dime was properly
accounted for, the result was an article reporting the facts only in
moderately disdainful terms.
The second paragraph in the article says that Magnus opposed a casino in the
area. What is not mentioned is that Magnus, due to conflict of interest,
refrains from voting on any of the legislation regarding a casino proposal
and also refrains from voting on routine liquor license matters that come
before council since he owns a bar within city limits. The moral of the
story? No good deed goes unpunished....
Wendy - 22 Oct 2007 14:09 GMT
You don't want to get me started on property taxes. lol They have come up
with myriad schemes to raise money particularly for the school systems. They
all promise off-setting the property tax with whatever new source of tax
revenue they have conjured up and it always ends up being in addition to
what we are already paying.
Oh, well OT I go.
In this case I'm sure it's just wrankling the powers that be that they
aren't getting their hands on that amount of money. Once they would, that
rescue would see nary a penny of it and be back to scraping and begging to
fund their operation.
Wendy
>> I'd be delighted if our rescue group would be the beneficiary of this
>> type of operation. We already have gambling in PA so I'd be happy to see
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> matters that come before council since he owns a bar within city limits.
> The moral of the story? No good deed goes unpunished....
James - 23 Oct 2007 15:19 GMT
I didn't realize rescue people get paid. $36K isn't too bad.
RobZip - 23 Oct 2007 23:47 GMT
>I didn't realize rescue people get paid. $36K isn't too bad.
Well, when the organization takes in around 300K a year, can afford to put
up a new barn to house 200+ cats, purchase their own vehicle - NEW - and pay
cash for about anything they need, the responsibility seems to pretty well
justify that sort of salary. The local humane society, entirely donation
funded makes no financial disclosures on staff salaries, expenses, etc.
Being donation and private funded, that is entirely their choice.
Cats Haven as a registered charity, has their finances made public by virtue
of the gaming permit. Perhaps this is worth a look in other areas.... Let's
face it, gambling operations of all kinds are being shoved down peoples
throats everywhere as it is, time for Fluffy to get her share.
RobZip - 24 Oct 2007 00:19 GMT
> In this case I'm sure it's just wrankling the powers that be that they
> aren't getting their hands on that amount of money. Once they would, that
> rescue would see nary a penny of it and be back to scraping and begging to
> fund their operation.
>
> Wendy
Heh, that's the beauty of the whole thing. The gaming permit is regulated by
the State. Local municipal governments have no say in approval of the
permit, the location it is licensed for, nor do they have any standing to
demand accountability beyond what the State requires be made public record.
Wrankilng the powers that be? Yes. Ray Magnus is a former city cop, long
time owner of a thriving downtown bar(one of the few things that thrives
downtown) and recently a 2 term city councilman, now running for council
president. He's got some of the current buffoons on the council a bit
intimidated at the prospect of business as usual coming to an end.