Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / Health and Behavior / August 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Cats Remember for 10 minutes ????

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Persian - 22 Aug 2007 16:48 GMT
Visual Memory v.s. Working Memory ...
What do you think??
Alex
http://PersianKittenEmpire.Com

------------------------------------------------------------
A new study has measured just low long cats can remember certain kinds
of information-10 minutes.

The research was designed primarily to compare cats' working memory of
their recent movements with their visual memories, and found that cats
remember better with their bodies than their eyes when they have
encountered an object placed in their path by say, an annoying owner
or experimenter.

When a cat steps over a stray toy or shoe left on the floor on the way
to its food dish, it has to coordinate the stepping action of its
front legs with its hind legs.

"Animals, including humans, unconsciously keep track of the location
of objects relative to the body as they move, and this tracking is
largely dependent on signals associated with movement of the body,"
said researcher Keir Pearson of the University of Alberta in Canada.

Though researchers were aware of this association, they wondered
exactly how kitty remembers to bring her hind legs up after her front
legs have cleared an obstacle.

To test cats' coordination, the researchers looked at how well they
could remember having just stepped over a hurdle. The researchers
stopped cats after their front legs had cleared an obstacle, but
before their hind legs went over.

They then distracted the animals with food and lowered the obstacle to
see how the tabbies would respond. The cats remembered having stepped
over the hurdle for at least 10 minutes, bringing their hind legs up
to clear the object, even though it wasn't there.

To compare this working memory to the cats' visual memory of the
obstacle, the researchers repeated the experiment, this time stopping
the cats just before they made their first step over the hurdle.

Turns out the cats weren't so good at remembering what they had seen
but not yet done: when the obstacle was removed this time, the cats
forgot it had even been there in the first place and continued on
their way.

"There's not high-stepping at all," Pearson told LiveScience.

"We've found that the long-lasting memory for guiding hind legs over
an obstacle requires stepping of the forelegs over the obstacle,"
Pearson said. "The main surprise was how short lasting the visual
memory on its own was-just a few seconds when animals were stopped
before their forelegs stepped over the obstacle."

Research with horses and dogs has shown similar results, Pearson
said.

Similar memories may play a role in humans' ability to navigate
objects in the dark or remember where they parked their car in the
morning.

By actually walking from your car into your office, you solidify the
memory of what space your car is in and don't spend half an hour
looking for it-well, not usually.
Cheryl - 23 Aug 2007 01:39 GMT
On Wed 22 Aug 2007 11:48:51a, Persian wrote in
rec.pets.cats.health+behav <news:1187797731.708481.173360
@q3g2000prf.googlegroups.com>:

> Visual Memory v.s. Working Memory ...
> What do you think??
> Alex
> http://PersianKittenEmpire.Com

I read that article today, too, and was thinking about some of what
it said. The article title is misleading. Of course cats remember
for more than 10 minutes.  The fact that an obstacle that they
stepped over with their front legs was under its body when they
were distracted for 10 minutes, and was removed without their
knowledge was what I thought was interesting. That they still
picked up their rear legs when proceeding on their way as if
stepping over the removed object.

I want to know the details of the visual part of the test - when
they were distracted *before* their front legs stepped over the
object, and when allowed to go on their way, forgot that there was
an obstacle there and didn't pick up their feet. I presume that
part of the test was that the obstacle was removed, but they had to
have left it there to draw conclusions. Did the cat trip over it?

Signature

Cheryl

bonbon - 23 Aug 2007 20:46 GMT
Seems that all eight of our cats remember things quite well.  In fact
all eight of them can count.......to two.

For example:

When we're eating supper, one of the cats will always come over and
beg for a bite.  Then another cat trots over, looks at us and says
"hey, she got a bite, now I want one two"

Laughs!

-bonbon

>Visual Memory v.s. Working Memory ...
>What do you think??
[quoted text clipped - 61 lines]
>memory of what space your car is in and don't spend half an hour
>looking for it-well, not usually.
Meghan Noecker - 24 Aug 2007 13:17 GMT
>Turns out the cats weren't so good at remembering what they had seen
>but not yet done: when the obstacle was removed this time, the cats
>forgot it had even been there in the first place and continued on
>their way.

This doesn't sound like an accurate test:

" when the obstacle was removed this time"

If the obstacle was removed (and still in front of them, the cats will
be smart enough to know there is no object in front of them.

How would a cat not notice that the object was rmeoved, literally from
under their nose?

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.