Cat Forum / Health and Behavior / July 2007
Best vacuum cleaner for "House of Cats"?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Eddy Bentley - 27 Jun 2007 19:11 GMT Hi.
I would really like to hear people's views on what kind of vacuum cleaner is best for a house of cats! The reason I'm asking is as follows.
For about ten years we have had an industrial vacuum cleaner in our house - the sort used by cleaners in office buildings, etc. It's a very powerful upright cylinder on wheels and you vacuum the carpet by way of the long "snake" attachment. The suction is extraordinary and you rub the carpet with the snake thing, with either the brush retracted or extended. (We've always used it with the brushes extended in order to try and rake up as much cat-hair as possible.)
For ten years, short of buying a Dyson, we have thought we couldn't do better than this machine. However, the previous owners of this house left an old upright Electrolux in the loft of our garage and, finally, after three years of ignoring it, yesterday we got it down and gave it a go on our regularly cleaned carpets. It's like an old Hoover. You push the whole thing round the carpet as if it were a brush. Anyway, before we tested it we turned it over, switched on the power, and put our hands around the front to gauge the amount of suction. LOUSY! Compared to our industrial cleaner it was a joke!
Anyway, we made sure the bag inside was empty to start with and then we gave the Electrolux a spin over the carpets of our living-room and dining-room. If it didn't perform it was destined for the recycling centre down the road! We took out the bag to see what "the lousy sucker" had managed to pick up and . . . WE WERE AMAZED! The bag was no longer empty but practically FULL ! Furthermore, the stuff inside was ALL cat hair! There was no dust, no dirt, no bits - because our carpets are regularly cleaned by the "expert sucker"!
Clearly, our expert sucker is useless at picking up hair that clings to carpet, or hair which gets trapped in carpet. But why?
We examined the Electrolux in action again and paid more attention to the RAPIDLY revolving cylinder of brushes immediately below its suction point. These really give the carpet a good brushing - in addition to the suction.
Maybe we should use both machines?
But the Electrolux is old. Maybe there's a new model out there that combines excellent suction with rapid circular brushing?
I've had a look at the Dyson website today and from what I've seen the Dyson only sucks. Our discovery with the old Electrolux suggests that excellent suction is simply not enough where cat hair is involved!
What's best? What do you think? What do people recommend?
Eddy.
Sherry - 27 Jun 2007 23:44 GMT On Jun 27, 1:11 pm, Eddy Bentley <eddy.bent...@removeALLbutRESTvirgin.net> wrote:
> Hi. > [quoted text clipped - 49 lines] > > Eddy. I've heard mixed reviews over the Dyson thats specifically marketed for pet owners . I wanted one, untilI did some research and read some reviews...now I'm not so sure.
I've never seen an Electrolux upright! My mom had a canister one, which really was awesome in its day.
Sherry
Cheryl - 28 Jun 2007 00:01 GMT > I've heard mixed reviews over the Dyson thats specifically > marketed for pet owners [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > one, which really was awesome > in its day. Count me in on one who loves the Dyson. Every time I vacuum it picks up enough fur to knit another cat. And I vacuum now 2x per week. Should do it more, though.
Someone I know loves one called Rainbow. It sucks the stuff up into a water chamber, which has pros and cons. My SIL had one of those, but now has a Dyson and she likes it better. But the person I know who still has a Rainbow swears by it.
 Signature Cheryl
Barry - 28 Jun 2007 00:11 GMT > > I've heard mixed reviews over the Dyson thats specifically > > marketed for pet owners [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > picks up enough fur to knit another cat. And I vacuum now 2x per > week. Should do it more, though. I'm going for the black and decker leaf blower. I never want another square inch of carpet in my house. I love the bare clean floors. I just take a leaf blower to mine, cat hair and sox and everything out the door! so ez
> Someone I know loves one called Rainbow. It sucks the stuff up into > a water chamber, which has pros and cons. My SIL had one of those, > but now has a Dyson and she likes it better. But the person I know > who still has a Rainbow swears by it. yakkin like a pac man
Eddy Bentley - 28 Jun 2007 11:02 GMT > I'm going for the black and decker leaf blower. I never want another > square inch of carpet in my house. I love the bare clean floors. I > just take a leaf blower to mine, cat hair and sox and everything out > the door! so ez That's original, Barry! But doesn't your leaf-blower also blow a lot of the dust and fur into the air . . . floating back down to the ground after you passed by?
Eddy.
MaryL - 28 Jun 2007 00:30 GMT > Hi. > [quoted text clipped - 49 lines] > > Eddy. I have a Dyson "The Animal," and it's fantastic. I've read mixed reviews so can't say if I have just been "lucky," but this one cleans rings around my previous vacuums (most recently, a Panasonic). And, it does have brushes, even though their ads focus almost entirely on suction power. You can also get a smaller rotating brush for furniture. They're not really brushes in the traditional sense -- more a series of spaced bristles -- but it works! The Dyson is big and heavy, but it's very easy to maneuver because it has large wheels.
MaryL
Eddy Bentley - 28 Jun 2007 11:05 GMT > I have a Dyson "The Animal," and it's fantastic. I've read mixed reviews so > can't say if I have just been "lucky," but this one cleans rings around my [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > The Dyson is big and heavy, but it's very easy to maneuver because it has > large wheels. Hi there, Mary. Thanks for the info.
If you lie your Dyson "Animal" on its side and then switch it on, can you see brushes revolving? And if you can, then do they revolve really fast - so that as you pass over the carpet every bit of it is likely to brushed half a dozen times at least?
Thanks.
Eddy.
Sherry - 29 Jun 2007 14:49 GMT On Jun 27, 6:30 pm, "MaryL" <stanco...@yahoo.comTAKE-OUT-THE-LITTER> wrote:
> > Hi. > [quoted text clipped - 60 lines] > > MaryL- Hide quoted text - Mary, the way I understood it, the Animal vac is the exact same vaccum as the regular Dyson, as far as the motor and amperage, it just has different attachments that are more suitable for picking up fur. Do you know if that's true? Also, does it seem top-heavy to you? That seems to be one of the complaints I keep hearing. I need to just go try one out.
Sherry
MaryL - 29 Jun 2007 18:23 GMT > On Jun 27, 6:30 pm, "MaryL" <stanco...@yahoo.comTAKE-OUT-THE-LITTER> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 83 lines] > > Sherry Yes, I think that is correct (concerning the attachments). I have not found it to be top-heavy. It is very heavy in weight but is easy to maneuver because of the large wheels. On the other hand, I would not want to have to carry it up and down stairs. It has a very long vacuum extension for the attachments (17 feet, if I remember correctly). I can leave the vacuum in the middle of the room and use the attachments with the vacuum hose (the hose that connects to attachments, not the cord) to clean furniture. I have seen pictures of people using it in that same way to clean stairs. It has never fallen over, compared to some other vacs that seemed to topple with the slightest pull on the hose.
MaryL
Photos of Duffy and Holly: >'o'< Duffy: http://tinyurl.com/cslwf Holly: http://tinyurl.com/9t68o Duffy and Holly together: http://tinyurl.com/8b47e
Christina Websell - 29 Jun 2007 21:00 GMT >> Hi. >> [quoted text clipped - 58 lines] > bristles -- but it works! The Dyson is big and heavy, but it's very easy > to maneuver because it has large wheels. I've had a cylinder Dyson for years, it's a DCO2, that's how old it is. I love it. Every time I use it (twice a week) it picks up enough cat hair and regular fluff to knit another cat. I can't recommend Dysons highly enough. It knocks spots off every other vacuum cleaner I ever had. I like the cylinder version because it is designed to sit on every stair as I go up vacuuming. If you have a bungalow or live on one floor only, the upright version might suit.
Tweed
Sherry - 29 Jun 2007 21:28 GMT On Jun 29, 3:00 pm, "Christina Websell" <spamf...@tinawebsell.wanadoo.co.uk> wrote:
> >> Hi. > [quoted text clipped - 68 lines] > > Tweed- Hide quoted text - It's a good testimony for Dyson that yours is still going strong. Most all vacuum cleaners pick up very well when you first get them. After a couple of years, some not so good anymore.
Sherry
MaryL - 29 Jun 2007 22:07 GMT > On Jun 29, 3:00 pm, "Christina Websell" > <spamf...@tinawebsell.wanadoo.co.uk> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 94 lines] > > Sherry I bought mine in Dec. 2004. A fantastic machine, despite some mixed reviews!
MaryL
Aileen - 29 Jun 2007 22:44 GMT I reccomend the Fantom. I have longhaired cats and when I vacuum I can't believe how much hair it picks up. You don't see the dirt but when you vacuum its just amazing how much it picks up. I would never use any other vacuum but my Fantom!
cybercat - 29 Jun 2007 22:49 GMT >I reccomend the Fantom. I have longhaired cats and when I vacuum I > can't believe how much hair it picks up. You don't see the dirt but > when you vacuum its just amazing how much it picks up. I would never > use any other vacuum but my Fantom! I bought a Fantom Thunder when they first came out (maybe 1997?), and it is a very powerful vacuum. But is is soooo heavy. We have three floors, and it is just awful getting up and down stairs. I finally got a cheap little Dirt Devil upright, and it does a fine job and is a lot lighter. That said, I have never used a more powerful vacuum than the Fantom.
femcat@nospam.com - 30 Jun 2007 07:12 GMT What a pertinent question considering that I'm now in the market for an excellent vacuum, too. That's the one area I haven't tried yet in our battle to stop our cat from licking her right hind leg until there are wounds showing. She's been diagnosed with a licky granuloma, but sometimes I'm not so sure. Where she used to lick wounds on both legs, now it's only her right, and there are two round ones. It could be an allergy to carpet mites, as she doesn't have fleas, or it could be an anxiety problem. We picked up one carpet and before the 2nd one is picked up, and we put her back on Prednisolone, I'd like to try a very good vacuum.
Anyway, I'm going to throw away the old vacuum and get a very good one. The Dyson's are very expensive, and Consumer Reports rated the Sears Kenmore's very highly in their latest review. I prefer the bag to the bagless as the latter gets too dirty. At about 50% of the cost of the Dyson, and only having one bedroom that has a carpet, I think I would rather get the Sears Kenmore.
Here's the link I found:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.home.repair/msg/20032785f6b5a422? hl=en&
The poster was kind enough to print the October, 2006 review:
Upright Canister ------- -------- Kenmore 35922 Electrolux EL7020A Electrolux EL5035A Kenmore 25614 Kenmore 36932 Kenmore 25914 Eureka 4870 Kenmore 25512 Hoover U6630-900 Bosch BSG81360UC
Has anyone any experience with the steam cleaner vacuums?
As an allergy sufferer, I've made a decision never to put down carpets again. I might try a throw rug, but good flooring is a much better and cleaner investment.
cybercat - 30 Jun 2007 07:19 GMT > Has anyone any experience with the steam cleaner vacuums? > > As an allergy sufferer, I've made a decision never to put down carpets > again. I might try a throw rug, but good flooring is a much better and > cleaner investment. Smart woman. We have hardwoods with throw rugs, though there is a large rug in the dining room and carpeting in the kitchen (really odd, I know ... it is sort of an industrial kind, came with the house) and wall-to-wall in two rooms we use for an office and storage.
I would not buy a steam cleaner because most have very small water tanks you have to keep refilling.
What I do is rent a "Rug Doctor" a few times a year and give the rugs and carpet I do have a deep cleaning. I go over the kitchen carpet four times or more before the water comes up clear. It does a nice job. (I am doing it tomorrow, as a matter of fact ...)
Eddy Bentley - 30 Jun 2007 13:07 GMT Thanks, everyone, for further thoughts on the best vacuum for a house of cats. I've also been doing a lot of online research. The concensus seems to be:
A. The "drag-arounds": - a Henry Turbo HVR200T-22 (aka "Henry Hound") - a Miele Cat & Dog
B. The "push-arounds": - any Sebo BS36 - any Dyson, provided you treat it like a cleaning goddess and lavish adoration and love upon its filters, conduits, and plastic parts!
So we're torn between the "drag-arounds" and the "push-arounds".
The Henry has fantastic suction AND a powered brush head. However, it is bulky to store and a bit of a pain to be carrying up and down the stairs, but you use it one state at all times, i.e. you use the hose to do the floors AND the stairs. On the other hand, you can't stand Henry by himself half way up the stairs and the hose doesn't look very long - so buying an extension or two for the hose might be necessary in order to do the stairs?
Re. the Dysons, I like the idea of being able to see into their transparent parts to see whether cleaning is needed or not. Also, the Dyson's "wand" (hose) is apparently long enough for you to do a long flight of carpeted stairs in one go. Unlike the Sebo though you can't glide the main machine under beds etc. Lots of people remark on the brittleness of the Dyson's parts and though we do treat our things with care, when you're vacuuming, pulling and pushing that thing round the floor and sometimes in a hurry, you are bound to hit bits of it quite hard aginst skirtings and furniture legs occasionally.
Hmmm. For thoroughness and ease of use, I think it's going to be either the Henry or the Sebo. But Henry's awkward, and the Sebo BS36 is a bit pricey.
Eddy.
femcat@nospam.com - 30 Jun 2007 19:03 GMT >Eddy Bentley <eddy.bentley@removeALLbutRESTvirgin.net >wrote innews:lIrhi.8897$%Z3.1762@newsfe3-gui.ntli.net:
> Hmmm. For thoroughness and ease of use, I think it's going to be either > the Henry or the Sebo. But Henry's awkward, and the Sebo BS36 is a bit > pricey. > > Eddy. What are the prices of the above units, the Miele and the Dyson? The Sears Kenmore runs about $299.
>"cybercat" <cyberpurrs@yahoo.com> wrote in news:f64slk$ij4$1@aioe.org:
> What I do is rent a "Rug Doctor" a few times a year Are those rented "Rug Doctors" safe to use when you rent them? Does the bottom and inside look like it's been scrubbed? How can one be sure that the store that rents them does all the necessary maintenance of the unit once it's returned by the previous customer? I was thinking of renting one myself. I see that supermarkets rent them out? Where's the best place to rent one from and what's the daily cost?
blkcatgal - 01 Jul 2007 23:14 GMT I just bought a Dyson DC-17. Was a bit expensive but I bought it at Bed, Bath & Beyond and they always are sending out 20% off coupons which I used. Saved me about $120. The Dyson is great, picks up all sorts of stuff that I didn't know was in the carpets, but you have to be careful on rugs and not use the beater brush.
Sue.
> Thanks, everyone, for further thoughts on the best vacuum for a house of > cats. I've also been doing a lot of online research. The concensus [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] > > Eddy.
|
|
|