Cat Forum / Health and Behavior / May 2007
Phelps to picket Falwell funeral -- will Chung join in?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
The REAL Holy Spirit - 16 May 2007 05:16 GMT Westboro Baptist Church (WBC Chronicles - Since 1955) 3701 SW 12th St. Topeka, Kansas 66604 785-273-0325 GodHatesFags.com Religious Opinion and Bible Commentaw on Current Events
Tuesday, May 15,2007 NEWS RELEASE
WBC to picket the funeral of Rev. Jerry Falwell - at Thomas Road Baptist Church, Lynchburg, Virginia - in religious protest and warning: "God is not mocked!,, Gal. 6:7. God Hates Fags! & Fag- Enablers!
Ergo, God hates Jerry Falwell, Billy Graham, Pat Robertson, and all such Arminian heretic preachers - from fundamentalist evangelicals to openly gay Episcopalians and pedophile Catholics - all of whom have created the Satanic Sodomite Zeitgeist wherein America has irreversibly gone the way of Sodom.
There is little doubt that Falwell split Hell wide open the instant he died. The evidence is compelling, overwhelming, and irrefragable. To wit:
1 Falwell was a true Calvinistic Baptist when he was a young preacher in Springfield, Missouri; and sold his soul to Free-Willism (Arminianism) for lucre.
2. Falwell bitterly and viciously attacked WBC because of WBC9s faithful Bible preaching - thereby committing the unpardonable sin - otherwise known as the sin gainst the Holy Ghost.
3. Falwell warmly praised Christ-rejecting Jews, pedophile-condoning Catholics, money-grubbing compromisers, practicing fags like Mel White, and backsliders like Billy Graham and Robert Schuler, Etc. All for lucre - making him guilty of their sins.
Ash - 16 May 2007 19:54 GMT > Westboro Baptist Church > (WBC Chronicles - Since 1955) > 3701 SW 12th St. Topeka, Kansas 66604 785-273-0325 GodHatesFags.com > Religious Opinion and Bible Commentaw on Current Events I thought this was too good to be true, but apparently not, it is their on the vile site
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 16 May 2007 20:33 GMT In rec.pets.cats.health+behav Ash <ash.amanic@virgin.net> wrote:
> > Westboro Baptist Church > > (WBC Chronicles - Since 1955) [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > I thought this was too good to be true, but apparently not, it is their > on the vile site Phelps makes Falwell look normal!
Charlie Wilkes - 16 May 2007 22:26 GMT On Wed, 16 May 2007 19:33:38 +0000, jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt wrote:
> In rec.pets.cats.health+behav Ash <ash.amanic@virgin.net> wrote: > > The REAL Holy Spirit wrote: [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Phelps makes Falwell look normal! This is why I never killfile anyone. If it weren't for this thread, I wouldn't have known that Phelps was planning to crash Falwell's funeral.
I think Phelps should pull out all the stops for this event. Maybe he could hire a skywriter to write "FALWELL WAS A FAG" in the blue sky above all the assembled mourners...
Charlie
look at us we're beautiful - 17 May 2007 13:37 GMT On May 16, 5:26 pm, Charlie Wilkes <charlie_wil...@users.easynews.com>
> I think Phelps should pull out all the stops for this event. Maybe he > could hire a skywriter to write "FALWELL WAS A FAG" in the blue sky above > all the assembled mourners... > > Charlie you shouldn't 86 the REAL Holy Spirit anyway Charlie
yeah, this should be an interesting funeral. Maybe they will be selling Red Hots
K - 17 May 2007 13:46 GMT On 16 May, 22:26, Charlie Wilkes <charlie_wil...@users.easynews.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 16 May 2007 19:33:38 +0000, jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt wrote: > > In rec.pets.cats.health+behav Ash <ash.ama...@virgin.net> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > Charlie
> This is why I never killfile anyone. If it weren't for this thread, I > wouldn't have known that Phelps was planning to crash Falwell's funeral.
> I think Phelps should pull out all the stops for this event. Maybe he > could hire a skywriter to write "FALWELL WAS A FAG" in the blue sky above > all the assembled mourners... Indeed, who is to say that this has not already been arranged? It would be interesting to know whether your networks will be covering this event, live? Now that would incline riveting viewing, just in case of course! K.
K - 17 May 2007 18:35 GMT > Westboro Baptist Church > (WBC Chronicles - Since 1955) [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > White, and backsliders like Billy Graham and Robert Schuler, Etc. All > for lucre - making him guilty of their sins. There is just one itty bitty question I forgot to ask. What has this got to do with cats?
Sorry to be a kill joy & all. K.
Matthew - 17 May 2007 18:52 GMT "K" <kittycarer@tiscali.co.uk>
< snipped>
> There is just one itty bitty question I forgot to ask. > What has this got to do with cats? > > Sorry to be a kill joy & all. > K. All you are doing is inviting the idiots here look at your crossposting and where it is going.
If you fell like you have to respond LEARN TO SNIP THEIR BS WOULD YOU SO THE REST OF US DON'T HAVE TO READ THEIR BS
Vinko Bogataj - 17 May 2007 19:49 GMT > "K" <kittyca...@tiscali.co.uk> > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > If you fell like you have to respond LEARN TO SNIP THEIR BS WOULD YOU SO > THE REST OF US DON'T HAVE TO READ THEIR BS What are you doing out of your private fiefdom? You don't control the content of this newsgroup, a.shole.
K - 17 May 2007 20:23 GMT > > "K" <kittyca...@tiscali.co.uk> > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > What are you doing out of your private fiefdom? You don't control the > content of this newsgroup, a.shole.
> What are you doing out of your private fiefdom? You don't control the > content of this newsgroup, a.shole. My My, we are a little uptight in our collective bottom's, Aren't we Vinko Bogataj?
I only asked what this had to do with cats after all. I would understand If I were to comment on your sexual prowess, but I'm not, so whats with the nasty bit?
if I could think of a reason, I might be inclined to take that one on the nose, but I didn't so therefore, I won't on this occasion.
Have I offended you in anyway, other than to reply a valid point to your discussion? TIA, K.
K - 17 May 2007 20:14 GMT > "K" <kittyca...@tiscali.co.uk> > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > If you fell like you have to respond LEARN TO SNIP THEIR BS WOULD YOU SO > THE REST OF US DON'T HAVE TO READ THEIR BS Oh Matthew, I am ever so sorry! I didn't consider this before posting this. Had I done so, I would have snipped it gladly. When you are new to a NG, it is sometimes hard to know the politics of the group, & know who/what upsets who.
Please accept my sincere apology, & I will snipety snip in the future. Regards, K.
look at us we're beautiful - 17 May 2007 20:20 GMT > Please accept my sincere apology, & I will snipety snip in the future. > Regards, > K. Maybe it's just me, but I'm not really feeling this apology. you have to actually pucker up when you type
K - 17 May 2007 20:40 GMT > > Please accept my sincere apology, & I will snipety snip in the future. > > Regards, > > K. > > Maybe it's just me, but I'm not really feeling this apology. > you have to actually pucker up when you type <Pucker, damned well pucker & More PUCKER>,
Hows that Matthew?
If I puckered anymore, the wind might change, then I'll be buggered because I would stay that way, & all in the name of Humility!!
It was my best Pucker, I Promise!
K.
Matthew - 17 May 2007 21:52 GMT >> > Please accept my sincere apology, & I will snipety snip in the future. >> > Regards, [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > K. That is not me Look at the Display name that was Barry messing with you not me
And no problem I accept even though you did not need to apologize
A lot of us have those idiots kill filed so we can ignore their post. Morons Like VB from above we just delete the message and move on laughing at them the whole time. The regular idiots we just kill file them and only have to read their dribble when someone forgets to snip. The worse is when someone crosspost to the known troll areas and they follow the thread back to the group yet another reason I started a moderated group
Joe Canuck - 17 May 2007 23:12 GMT >>>> Please accept my sincere apology, & I will snipety snip in the future. >>>> Regards, [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > someone crosspost to the known troll areas and they follow the thread back > to the group yet another reason I started a moderated group Yet, Matthew is still here participating. LOL
Must not be all that bad here.
K - 18 May 2007 07:23 GMT > >> > Please accept my sincere apology, & I will snipety snip in the future. > >> > Regards, [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Oh Goodness, how humiliating! Never mind. I'm sure that I am not the only person to make this error, neither will I be the last either. It doesn't deflect me from feeling a prize fool though. SH@T...Lots of blushing going on around here! K.
Joe Canuck - 17 May 2007 23:09 GMT >> "K" <kittyca...@tiscali.co.uk> >> [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > Regards, > K. Don't be too concerned over Matthew... he is one of this group's idiots.
K - 18 May 2007 07:27 GMT > >> "K" <kittyca...@tiscali.co.uk> > [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > > - Show quoted text - How so? I find him quite congenial, kind and considerate. Does that make you an Idiot? I must admit that is a new one on me. I thought pleasant people are rather nice, not idiots!
K.
look at us we're beautiful - 18 May 2007 12:35 GMT > Does that make you > an Idiot? what I can't figure out is how he learned to even make a post.
Matthew - 18 May 2007 14:53 GMT >> >> "K" <kittyca...@tiscali.co.uk> >> [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] >> > Regards, >> > K. <snipped fro being posted by an a@@hole>
>> - Show quoted text - > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > K. K met Joe one of the groups resident a@@hole and trolls
K - 18 May 2007 16:04 GMT > >> >> "K" <kittyca...@tiscali.co.uk> > [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Oh My...Now I am Really confused. Let me try again.
I was asking Joe how Matthew qualified as an idiot? Personally, I have found Matthew to be congenial, kind, considerate & well spoken. (ie: He doesn't spout Bull Sh*t every time he has something to say), & I find him rather pleasant. This being the case, how would Matthew be considered as an idiot?
I suppose I should have worded it like this: How so? I find him to be quite congenial, kind & considerate. Does that make one look like an Idiot?
I'm sorry if I caused any confusion K.
Matthew - 18 May 2007 16:15 GMT "K" <kittycarer@tiscali.co.uk>
I understood everything you where asking. And Thank you for the kind words I appreciate them
That is why I said K met Joe he is one of the resident A@@holes of the group. Joe and a few others which I am sure you can figure out who is who are the resident trolls and A@@holes of the group. Some act nice and play well sometimes but than show how they are such as Joe has
K - 18 May 2007 16:31 GMT > "K" <kittyca...@tiscali.co.uk> > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > are the resident trolls and A@@holes of the group. Some act nice and play > well sometimes but than show how they are such as Joe has You are most welcome. I merely speak the truth as I see it.
I think the hardest thing to figure out on Usenet or N.Groups, is the various aliases that people use. I sometimes think that I recognise a style of writing only to find that it is someone else completely. Or, it is the same person, but under a different name!
I have been trying to figure out why people would do this, but have not come up with a decent theory just yet. Any thoughts on this one?
K.
Matthew - 18 May 2007 20:59 GMT >> "K" <kittyca...@tiscali.co.uk> >> [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > K. Yep some people use the Display names for the mood they are in. Some us different names in different groups.
I just use my name now but my email is fake to keep spam bots from harvesting my email
Joe Canuck - 18 May 2007 23:39 GMT > "K" <kittycarer@tiscali.co.uk> > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > are the resident trolls and A@@holes of the group. Some act nice and play > well sometimes but than show how they are such as Joe has <yawn>
Yet another troll post by Matthew.
It is always the same with these trolls... they claim everyone else is the idiot. Of course, that is just the way their minds work... they are right and everyone else is wrong. Hence his formation of a new little moderator group where anyone disagreeing with his opinion gets the boot. I proved that point in here a while back.
cybercat - 18 May 2007 23:43 GMT >> "K" <kittycarer@tiscali.co.uk> >> [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > group where anyone disagreeing with his opinion gets the boot. I proved > that point in here a while back. Joe, why do you bother? You're not here about cats.
Joe Canuck - 19 May 2007 02:06 GMT >>> "K" <kittycarer@tiscali.co.uk> >>> [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > Joe, why do you bother? You're not here about cats. Pot Kettle Black... you get the idea. More of the same from you... why do *you* bother. Rhetorical question that.. notice the lack of ? mark.
I've been bossed by cats for years. My current boss is a 20 lb female seal point mitted Ragdoll.
I'm as concerned as anyone here about the recent food fiasco... and about the general welfare of my pet... er boss. :-D
cybercat - 19 May 2007 02:17 GMT >>>> "K" <kittycarer@tiscali.co.uk> >>>> [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > I'm as concerned as anyone here about the recent food fiasco... and about > the general welfare of my pet... er boss. :-D I post about cats every day. As I recall, you used to, a long time ago. Now it seems your interest is mostly in provoking others--and a.sholes, of course, and anal sex.
look at us we're beautiful - 19 May 2007 02:59 GMT > > "Joe Canuck" <Joe_Can...@-remove-gmail.com> wrote in message
> > Joe, why do you bother? You're not here about cats. > > Pot Kettle Black... you get the idea. More of the same from you. admitting your behavior is the first step in recovery.
good work Joe, don't feel ashamed.
Matthew - 19 May 2007 06:11 GMT >>> "K" <kittycarer@tiscali.co.uk> >>> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >> >> <yawn> < snipped for being posted by a true moron>
> Joe, why do you bother? You're not here about cats. He feels like he has power Cyber he is making up for his lack of manhood and Brandy ignoring him. I think he secretly feels people actual give a sh@t what he says. I am so glad I kill filed him. I rather read Iben stuff than his and I think that makes him a little mad. Can every one say poor Joe
look at us we're beautiful - 19 May 2007 06:23 GMT > >>> "K" <kittyca...@tiscali.co.uk> > [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > than his and I think that makes him a little mad. Can every one say poor > Joe smoke them buds
Joe Canuck - 19 May 2007 11:44 GMT >>>> "K" <kittycarer@tiscali.co.uk> >>>> [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > than his and I think that makes him a little mad. Can every one say poor > Joe The sad truth... you are still reading and talking about Joe.
look at us we're beautiful - 17 May 2007 20:18 GMT > There is just one itty bitty question I forgot to ask. > What has this got to do with cats? > > Sorry to be a kill joy & all. > K. not at all FALWELL WAS A PUSSY
K - 17 May 2007 20:44 GMT > > There is just one itty bitty question I forgot to ask. > > What has this got to do with cats? [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > not at all > FALWELL WAS A PUSSY That explains it all then.... I feel so MUCH BETTER Now I know that. LOL! K.
quibbler - 18 May 2007 00:52 GMT > WBC to picket the funeral of Rev. Jerry Falwell Like there is a dimes worth of difference between WBC and FoulWhale's crazy followers. FoulWhale probably would have been holding signs for WBC if he hadn't been so out of shape.
 Signature Quibbler (quibbler247atyahoo.com) "It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow' disease, and many others, but I think a case can be made that faith is one of the world's great evils, comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins
Cary Kittrell - 18 May 2007 03:01 GMT > > WBC to picket the funeral of Rev. Jerry Falwell > > Like there is a dimes worth of difference between WBC and FoulWhale's > crazy followers. FoulWhale probably would have been holding signs for > WBC if he hadn't been so out of shape. To be fair, Falwell has denounced Phelps and Clan -- thus earning himself a predictable response, see www.godhatesfags.com, at the top of the page.
-- cary
Father Haskell - 18 May 2007 04:55 GMT > In article <MPG.20b698f1744e28a5989...@news.readfreenews.net> quibbler <quibbler...@yahoo.com> writes: > > In article <1179289003.156531.306...@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > himself a predictable response, seewww.godhatesfags.com, at > the top of the page. To be fair, Falwell probably kept his romantic attentions within his species.
Lilah Morgan - 18 May 2007 00:54 GMT Three words come to mind...Pot, meet Kettle
|
|
|