 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue CatKB.com Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map |
Cat Forum / Health and Behavior / May 2007Has anyone thought about starting a google group yet
I thought a few of us could do this. Anyone up for it >I thought a few of us could do this. Anyone up for it I think Barry has!  SignaturePosted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com You all should receive a invitation >>I thought a few of us could do this. Anyone up for it >> > I think Barry has! > >>I thought a few of us could do this. Anyone up for it > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Good. Now get the f.ck out of my newsgroup. "sheeluvsme" <sheilaluvsme@yahoo.com> <snipped> You wish but it does not matter you have been added to the kill list > "sheeluvsme" <sheilaluvsme@yahoo.com> > > <snipped> > > You wish but it does not matter you have been added to the kill list I thought it was cute. All the pimply beginner trolls do this. "I OWN THIS GROUP." hahaha > "sheeluvsme" <sheilaluv...@yahoo.com> > > <snipped> > > You wish but it does not matter you have been added to the kill list Thank you Matthew, that was very thoughtful of you to filter for me. I don't have to guess too far to imagine what helpful chap wanted, but I didn't need to read it. It gets boring after so long. You would think the guy would get the message, but it appears he doesn't. Not having to worry about that one makes it a very alluring place to look forward to. S;o) > You all should receive a invitation :D SignaturePosted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com > You all should receive a invitation What is the point of starting a new group? Charlie >> You all should receive a invitation > > What is the point of starting a new group? > > Charlie To have fun in a personal way instead of dealing with the idiots we can enjoy ourselves. You are welcome to join Charlie >>> You all should receive a invitation >> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > enjoy ourselves. > You are welcome to join Charlie Oooooooo, a new highschool clique! Can I join, huh, please, please, pretty please??? Hugs, CatNipped you will always be welcome there cat >>>> You all should receive a invitation >>> [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > CatNipped > >> You all should receive a invitation > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > enjoy ourselves. > You are welcome to join Charlie > To have fun in a personal way instead of dealing with the idiots we can > enjoy ourselves. > You are welcome to join Charlie I would very disappointed if I didn't see you there too Carlie. It wouldn't be the same without you there. I think this is a brilliant idea. There are so many time's that we go way off Topic & lately I have felt bad for doing that. This group really should be a place where people come to get advice and know that they are going to get that help (if we can more to the point...), not ending their topic with a blazing row because of a troll or clash of personalities, and the OP ends up with no news that they should have got... I'm not silly enough to think that would end by starting a new group, because there are sh.t stirrers every where and sometimes in every one. The point of the group would be a half way between anec.health.beaviour with most off topic welcome if relevant somehow...? Am I guess in the right direction? I think that sometimes we trigger off too much, & I think that is a good reason why to move it to a different home. The more the merrier I think....I'd be glad to see 99% of us there @ one time or another, for sure;o) S;o) >> >> You all should receive a invitation >> [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] > one time or another, for sure;o) > S;o) Actually it would keep the idiots away due to it will be a restricted group by invitation only and it has adult restrictions so we can be ourselves in there. Yes we would have problems between members if there is problems but that is life. But anyone that comes and causes a problem such as a troll bye bye It would be a way from the problems of the open group on the internet. A few others have done this on yahoo. It is a way for us "friends" out here to be ourselves > >> "Charlie Wilkes" <charlie_wil...@users.easynews.com> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 49 lines] > > - Show quoted text - All sorted, LOL I'm a member.....<beaming> S;o) >>> You all should receive a invitation >> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > enjoy ourselves. > You are welcome to join Charlie Have you "Instant Messaging" available? >>>> You all should receive a invitation >>> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Have you "Instant Messaging" available? I HATE instant messaging! not sure but the message post immediately but you can email us proud-cat-slaves@googlegroups.com >>>> You all should receive a invitation >>> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Have you "Instant Messaging" available? >> You all should receive a invitation > > What is the point of starting a new group? So we can exclude some people and include others and generally say NYAH NYAH NYAH. What's not to love about that, Charrrrrlie? :D >>> You all should receive a invitation >> What is the point of starting a new group? [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > What's not to love about that, Charrrrrlie? :D Sounds exactly like a mutual admiration society. "Don't agree with my opinion about cat food? Ok, zappo you are history." >>>> You all should receive a invitation >>> What is the point of starting a new group? [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > "Don't agree with my opinion about cat food? Ok, zappo you are history." EXACTLY! It's perfect, ain't it? :D >>>> You all should receive a invitation >>> What is the point of starting a new group? [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > "Don't agree with my opinion about cat food? Ok, zappo you are history." No not that I would never do that but it is a way to zap idiots like Nick and bend over >> "Don't agree with my opinion about cat food? Ok, zappo you are >> history." > > No not that I would never do that but it is a way to zap > idiots like Nick and bend over Just ignore them. You don't use Google so you can KF them. Or don't. But don't whine about it. SignatureCheryl /Gawd, did I write that??? Am I growing up?? I DUNNA WANNA GROW UP I'M A TOYS-R-US KID........... >>> "Don't agree with my opinion about cat food? Ok, zappo you are >>> history." [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Just ignore them. You don't use Google so you can KF them. Or > don't. But don't whine about it. Kill filing only works as long as someone learns to clip their BS On Tue 01 May 2007 11:00:46p, Matthew wrote in rec.pets.cats.health+behav <news:4637fed8$0$16724 $4c368faf@roadrunner.com>: > Kill filing only works as long as someone learns to clip their BS Here's what I ignore: Barry: blah blah blah Barry: blah go f.ck yourself Barry: ya, you too fanboi See, I miss the in-betweens because the chunky demon is kf'd. If a thread shows as just Barry seemingly talking to himself, it means he's replying to the current village idiot. Sometimes I'm curious about what they're arguing about because it can be pretty funny, but I'm just too busy right now to care. SignatureCheryl > On Tue 01 May 2007 11:00:46p, Matthew wrote in > rec.pets.cats.health+behav <news:4637fed8$0$16724 [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > about what they're arguing about because it can be pretty funny, but > I'm just too busy right now to care. Barry *is* the current village idiot. So there we go, a disagreement on exactly WHO the idiots are in here... so basically one set of idiots decides to form their own group so they can enjoy their own idiotic company (as defined by some). Big deal. They will still be lurking and perhaps posting in here. >> On Tue 01 May 2007 11:00:46p, Matthew wrote in rec.pets.cats.health+behav >> <news:4637fed8$0$16724 [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > Big deal. They will still be lurking and perhaps posting in here. You can forget the invitation if you feel that way >>> On Tue 01 May 2007 11:00:46p, Matthew wrote in >>> rec.pets.cats.health+behav <news:4637fed8$0$16724 [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > > You can forget the invitation if you feel that way Nyah Nyah Nyah! hahahaha! This is really fun, Matthew. Who'd have thought you'd have raised such a big stink with a little Google group?! >>> On Tue 01 May 2007 11:00:46p, Matthew wrote in rec.pets.cats.health+behav >>> <news:4637fed8$0$16724 [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > > You can forget the invitation if you feel that way Quite honestly Mathew... I'm not looking for an invitation, particularly if I'm not going to be able to express my opinion. As far as I can see, the signal-to-noise ratio out of Barry is far to high. I'll ask you this... when was the last time Barry posted anything useful in the group, without the accompanying attitude, with respect to the care & feeding of felines? > Quite honestly Mathew... I'm not looking for an invitation, particularly > if I'm not going to be able to express my opinion. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > useful in the group, without the accompanying attitude, with respect to > the care & feeding of felines? Killfile him, Joe. >> On Tue 01 May 2007 11:00:46p, Matthew wrote in rec.pets.cats.health+behav >> <news:4637fed8$0$16724 [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > Big deal. They will still be lurking and perhaps posting in here. Says the idiot who had nothing much to say once "Brandy Alexander" stopped posting. Pffft. lol >>> You all should receive a invitation >> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > What's not to love about that, Charrrrrlie? :D I don't like the concept. I want unfiltered access to whatever gets posted. If it doesn't interest me, I don't read it, but I want that to be my decision and nobody else's. Charlie >>>> You all should receive a invitation >>> [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Charlie What have you done with Charlie, and more importantly, what have you done with his sense of humor? >>>>> You all should receive a invitation >>>> [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > What have you done with Charlie, and more importantly, what have you > done with his sense of humor? Well, is this google group concept a joke, or is it for real? Charlie >>>>>> You all should receive a invitation >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > Charlie It is for real Charlie I saw you joined last night. So far a few have come but most probably don't recognize the email address >>>>>>> You all should receive a invitation >>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > It is for real Charlie I saw you joined last night. So far a few have > come but most probably don't recognize the email address Yeah, I got the email and checked it out. I don't quite understand what need being addressed, other than to exclude a single individual who apparently has really gotten to some of you. Too bad, I say... just ignore the guy, or else play his game and have fun with it. Also, I tend to agree with Rhonda. Groups become stagnant without fresh blood. This group was getting that way, and then all of a sudden bookie and sheelagh blew in the door... they really livened things up. But, it's up to each individual to do what he/she wants. Good luck with the new group. Charlie >>>>>>>> You all should receive a invitation >>>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] > > Charlie No Charlie you got a little wrong ;-) we are still going to be here it is just a place for many of us to get a little closer to have fun with other things with out having to deal with the idiots. I still love coming to the group despite the idiots the fresh blood makes it interesting but to be able to go somewhere without them makes it a little taste of paradise >>>>>>>>> You all should receive a invitation >>>>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 40 lines] > the group despite the idiots the fresh blood makes it interesting but to > be able to go somewhere without them makes it a little taste of paradise AND ALSO WE CAN TALK BEHIND EVERYBODY'S BACKS WHO YOU WON'T LET IN! As Barry might say, WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! I am going to join just as soon as you take that apostrophe out. > Yeah, I got the email and checked it out. I don't quite understand what > need being addressed, WE CAN TALK ABOUT EVERYBODY BEHIND THEY BACKS!! hahahaha! :D On 2 May, 22:06, Charlie Wilkes <charlie_wil...@users.easynews.com> wrote: > >>>>>>> You all should receive a invitation > [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Why, Thank you Charlie, Do I pay you now...Or later,LOL? I don't know whether to laugh, or cry... <setteling for a grin> S;o) PS:I posted Ringo's & Liger's Nephew for you to meet.... He made me smile;o) >>>>>> You all should receive a invitation >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > Well, is this google group concept a joke, or is it for real? It's real but I was just playing. :) "cybercat" <cyberpurrs@yahoo.com> Got to have fun some how >>>>You all should receive a invitation >>> [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > posted. If it doesn't interest me, I don't read it, but I want that to > be my decision and nobody else's. They did started a private group on another usenet group -- I decided not to join but kept getting these notices. Seems that they had a few people on the group all of the time but ran out of things to talk about. I think they thought it was fun at first, then it got boring. They didn't have the new flavors coming in or new people with new situations. Rhonda >>>>>You all should receive a invitation >>>> [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > Rhonda Usenet. It's a double-edged sword. :) SignaturePosted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com > I don't like the concept. I want unfiltered access to whatever gets > posted. If it doesn't interest me, I don't read it, but I want that to > be my decision and nobody else's. > > Charlie Not only that...I don't want to circle-jerk with some of these twats...Sounds scarily like anecdolts... You will be assimilated! -L. >> I don't like the concept. I want unfiltered access to whatever gets >> posted. If it doesn't interest me, I don't read it, but I want that to [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Not only that...I don't want to circle-jerk with some of these > twats...Sounds scarily like anecdolts... You will be assimilated! Where you been, Sunshine? :D > I thought a few of us could do this. Anyone up for it What would be the name of this group? Any thought's? S:o) >> I thought a few of us could do this. Anyone up for it > > What would be the name of this group? > Any thought's? > S:o) Proud Cat Slaves > >> I thought a few of us could do this. Anyone up for it > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Proud Cat Slaves I'm up for it;o) S;o) > > "sheelagh" <sheelagh_mad...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > I'm up for it;o) > S;o) I bet Bookie would be too..!! You all should receive a invitation >> 00:16, "Matthew" <Iamacatsl...@proudtoserve.com> wrote: >> >> I thought a few of us could do this. Anyone up for it [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > I'm up for it;o) > S;o) >>> I thought a few of us could do this. Anyone up for it >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >> > Proud Cat Slaves Stupid For Cats. ;) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- From: "Matthew" <Iamacatslave@proudtoserve.com> >I thought a few of us could do this. Anyone up for it I'd never join a Google group that would have a person like me as a member! (apologies to Groucho) > I thought a few of us could do this. Anyone up for it A nice idea & sounds quite interesting. What do you have to do to get an invitation by the way? K. On 4 May, 00:05, kittyca...@tiscali.co.uk wrote: > > I thought a few of us could do this. Anyone up for it > > A nice idea & sounds quite interesting. > What do you have to do to get an invitation by the way? > K. I haven't received an invitation, hurrah!!! I am too subversive for people!!! that makes me smile. anyway, outgrouping causes ingrouping, or something also i liek the 'idiots' they amuse me with they utter f.cked-up-ness, the fact that there is this chap called nick or something who is actually expending lots of energy stalking and annoying people for some reason, maybe he has nothing else in his life I don't really know. He probably doesn't actually have any cats, or interest in them, but he is so friendless that he has to come on to a usenet group to talk to people but because he has no social skills he doesn't really know how to make friends in the normal way (ie being nice) It is kind of like the kid in the school playground who has poor communication skills and no friends and the only way he thinks he can get people to talk to him or notice him is to group and punch them or steal their bags or something and instead of getting friend he just gets enemies because really all he does is piss people off and push them away, but he doesn't understand why because he is too socially immature. i just find people like that intriguing, i like to poke them and see what they will do next , cruel i know but it amuses me. To be honest they are too far below me in the food chain to really care abuot they say, most of it is for effect or attention, they are just so irrelevant inthe grand scheme of things to really let them get to me or really annoy me. Isn't that incredibly pompous? I feel the same about some of the kids i teach at times, particualrly one kid today who was complaining that i was shouting at him just cos he was annoying me and I had to laugh and tell him that he was not annoying me at all, he was not important enough in the world to be able to annoy me, that instead he had amused me momentarily with his sad behaviour. He was rather subdued after that, maybe i made him realise that he wasn't the centre of my world after all. also we don't have people like barry in our country, or at least i do not encounter them anyway, so he is amusing too, quite a card in fact. and then there are the arseholes who talk about delawing their cats and they are useful for when i have had a bad day and just want to let rip at someone pathetic and let them have my anger with both barrels. i suppose everyone has their place in society somewhere, i woudl hope that mine woudl be in the middle of a big pile of sleeping kittens bookie I sent you one Bookie > On 4 May, 00:05, kittyca...@tiscali.co.uk wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 49 lines] > > bookie > I sent you one Bookie > [quoted text clipped - 53 lines] > > - Show quoted text - don't think I got it, unless it went straight to my junk mail folder and got deleted > On 4 May, 00:05, kittyca...@tiscali.co.uk wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 49 lines] > > bookie > also i liek the 'idiots' they amuse me with they utter f.cked-up-ness, > the fact that there is this chap called nick or something who is [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > talk to people but because he has no social skills he doesn't really > know how to make friends in the normal way (ie being nice) I wish that I could say the same thing Bookie. I can't stand the bloody idiot, & the more I tell him to F@ck off, he seems to inhale deeply & savour the aroma so that it infuses him with the pompous a.s fool notion that I care one fig about his abnormal lifestyle. It doesn't matter how many times I tell him that he really is revolting, the more I see/hear of him from him. UGHHHHH! > also i like the 'idiots' they amuse me with they utter f.cked-up-ness, > the fact that there is this chap called nick or something who is [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > talk to people but because he has no social skills he doesn't really > know how to make friends in the normal way If I could find something even remotely human about him, I would tell him to seek help for his unhealthy tastes in Fu@king up other people's lives... but he is deaf to anything, except, When you even mention the creep. So for me, Matthews party room is a nice escapade away from the tedium of his ceaseless overtures & whining childlike overtures, in which he see-saws between calling me a fu@king FU@K-WIT, to telling everyone that I love him & can't resist him(ROFLMAO)...some hope, LOL!! Never in a million years would I consider him harmless though. I am just waiting for the fool to trip up on his rented tuxedo currently. Village Idiot?? Don't you mean GLOBAL IDIOT..???????? > also we don't have people like Barry in our country, or at least i do > not encounter them anyway, so he is amusing too, quite a card in fact. This in fact is very True, LOL.. He certainly is unique & god broke the mould when he made him;o) I think he is hilarious & rather sweet really. He speaks as he finds, & even though we did start on a rocky outcrop, we made friends & I have never regretted it @ alI & couldn't care less if anyone choose to kill file for that reason alone. He has never hurt me, & I see no reason to either dislike him, or appear to for fear of what others might think because of that reason. I also know that this Pi@s's Roof bunny no end & I enjoy taking his attention away from Nicko the sicko(aka Nick De Prick) depending on how you feel @ any given moment...hahaha >"o"< Anyway, I thought you would be up for it sometimes? It would be rather nice to go in there and let rip occasionally without the guilt of feeling that you have inflicted your opinion just a TAD Too Much...I know that I do, but only when someone antagonises me to snapping point..... Speak later mate..... My kittens are coming home tomorrow because their grandma is going into hospital to have her hip replaced the day after, so I have got to bring the kittens home and Tahnee( foster milk nanny/mummy) & her two kittens too..It is going to be a full house here for the next couple of weeks. I have worked out arrangements for them all & where they will reside too. All of ours are going to be living downstairs or outside in the pens whilst we have good weather, Tahnee & the kittens will be staying upstairs, & both Taz & Biffy are out in the pens, as is Sofie the Bi- Colour Ragdoll, and Lucy(fur!) too.... A very busy time indeed. I'm keeping Ringo downstairs with our indoor girls. The kittens have grown so much!! I MUST get a camera from somewhere to take photos of Spicy Ringo, Belle and Lilly N Tig's, & all of the baby's, including the Birman kittens and their dark tortie sister & their tabby brother..It is going to be hard work for a few weeks, but I am certain that it will go fine. It always does if your chucked in @ the deep end..it is only when you look back @ it, that you think,"well how the hell did we get through that one"..? All in a good cause, LOL S;o) > I wish that I could say the same thing Bookie. I can't stand the bloody > idiot, & the more I tell him to F@ck off, he seems to inhale deeply & > savour the aroma so that it infuses him with the pompous a.s fool notion > that I care one fig about his abnormal lifestyle. It doesn't matter how > many times I tell him that he really is revolting, the more I see/hear > of him from him. UGHHHHH! You have neatly summed up the paradox you now face, Sheelagh. On the one hand, you are bothered by the fact that this guy thinks you actually care about what he says. But on the other hand, you are validating his sense of empowerment when you offer a strongly emotional response to his taunts. And, indeed, he does savor it. It's what he wants and hopes for. So why do you continue to reward him? I don't think this character is particularly malevolent. He will never spring from the back seat of your car when you are leaving a parking lot. He's not making threats, or at least he's not making credible threats, and he's not researching you so he can post private information about you. He's just a smart-a.s, only as troublesome as you allow him to be. Charlie On May 4, 1:54 am, Charlie Wilkes <charlie_wil...@users.easynews.com> wrote: > > I wish that I could say the same thing Bookie. I can't stand the bloody > > idiot, & the more I tell him to F@ck off, he seems to inhale deeply & [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > Charlie Interesting that she spends so much time prattling on and on about someone she professes to hate, don't you think? Almost as if she's obsessed... Aside: BTW, my dear British bonehead, posting in Matthew's little hiding place from the terrors of the big bad world does not give your posts an invisibility cloak. "I hoped after my last performance with him , in which I was threatening to jump into the void if he didn't leave me by, had worked... " LOFL! So you're a moron *and* a liar? "I never did find a way to KF him..." > On May 4, 1:54 am, Charlie Wilkes <charlie_wil...@users.easynews.com> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 39 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Correct, a bandied fed up worn out LIAR to be precise if you please..!! Actually, you know what Nick..? I really couldn't care less what you have to say anymore. Charlie is right in what he had to say. you are not going to land on my door step, I will never meet you, & if it gives you a cheap thrill to expose me as a LIAR, please be my guest & go ahead. I'm sure everyone will rush to your side and say "Hooray, good old Nick", & pet you, won't they.....? The only reason I wanted to get away from you is because you are such a cling on. It doesn't matter where I am, who I am talking to, you just have to butt in like a petulant child begging attention. I'm sick of giving it to you; I have 5 petulant children of my own to deal with, so I don't need another one, & especially not you! In fact if the truth be known, the only reason you try and make me look a fool is because I had the outrage to agree with some of Barry's posts.. & you so "Hate him" for making you look like a prize peach every single time.. I don't even feel angry with you or afraid anymore. I don't feel the need to be protected from you anymore, & I am devoid of all emotion when I see you now which is quite a relief now that I reflect upon it. Go, sing your own praises, hold me aloft and name and shame me..I couldn't care less. Charlie is correct in every word he Say's there. I used to feel repulsed and afraid of you, but things change and so have I. I don't feel the need to be protected from you, because all you really are is a bully boy. The difference being that I am no longer afraid of you...it's a wonderful feeling to be set free. Only I could do it though. With all the best intentions in the world, no one could do that for me. I had to do it myself. Mind you, I would like to thank Charlie for writing it in black and white for me to consider though. Thanks Charlie..I would never have made a good troll even if I had tried to be one. I might be loud and opinionated, but that's as far as I go....... You have no hold over me anymore. To matter to me, I would have to feel @ least some emotion, but I don't. so it looks like you have inadvertently set me free Nick. THANK YOU. I APPRECIATE IT.... S;o) > > Interesting that she spends so much time prattling on and on about > > someone she professes to hate, don't you think? Almost as if she's [quoted text clipped - 39 lines] > inadvertently set me free Nick. > THANK YOU. I APPRECIATE IT.... QED What a tool you are. > > > Interesting that she spends so much time prattling on and on about > > > someone she professes to hate, don't you think? Almost as if she's [quoted text clipped - 45 lines] > > - Show quoted text - QUAD ERAT DEMONSTRANDUM > On May 4, 1:54 am, Charlie Wilkes <charlie_wil...@users.easynews.com> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 39 lines] > > - Show quoted text - I have so many question I do not know where to start.... what is it you get out of harrasing people? did you have any friends when you were younger? did you find it difficult to make friends? is this still the case? do you feel unhappy when you think you are being ignored by people? do you have any close family and do you currently live with them? do you enjoy pissing people off? do you understand the negative feelings you inspire in other people? if so what do you think about that? i am just interested to know whether you are actually aware that you and your attentions are not wanted by some people, and also whether you understand what feelign 'upset' is and that other people can feel 'upset' inthe same way that you must do occasionally. do you think that people are just joking when they tell you to 'get lost'? how do you feel about that? do you feel that even negative responses to your behaviour are better than no responses at all from other people? do you feel lonely? do you have people aronud you with whom you can talk to face to face? do you actually live with anyone? do you have a job of any kind (this can include unpaid and voluntary work)? has there ever been any history of autism or aspergers syndrome in your family before? also why do you like to make statements that an individual (in this case sheelagh, but I am sure there have been others) 'love you'? do you really believe this is the case or is it just a behaviour designed to produce some sort of reaction (even a negative one) from another person? this is all very interesting, any responses to these questions would be interesting and may prove helpful even for yourself if they enable you to achieve some sort of awareness of your situation and perhaps give you the impetus to change. Also what kind of medication are you on a present? thanks in advance bookie > I have so many question I do not know where to start.... Oh ferchrissakes bookie. Why don't you just email this guy with some nekkid pix of yourself in a rowboat? He's obviously got a grip on you that you can't shake, so you may as well abandon yourself to his pleasure. Charlie On May 4, 8:18 pm, Charlie Wilkes <charlie_wil...@users.easynews.com> wrote: > > I have so many question I do not know where to start.... > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Charlie Laughable, really. You'd think they'd never seen a pisstake before. > On May 4, 8:18 pm, Charlie Wilkes <charlie_wil...@users.easynews.com> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Laughable, really. You'd think they'd never seen a pisstake before. There was nothing funny about it (@ the time...), I assure you. Nevertheless, it was the catalyst that ended the persecution, so I suppose that the laugh and the piss take really, was reflected @ you. I never intended to hide my posts. What do you take me for? The gibbering idiot you tried to manipulate me into? Anymore than I thought you wouldn't read the posts I made that you quoted me from. So what? You were a bully! Now you are a non entity... >From now on,. I am looking forward to watching you from a completely different point of view. One where I can observe rather than react to. I'm so pleased that Bookie made you introspective. Possibly it was the reality check you needed.( not that I think you will ever change, you just won't affect me in any way @ all)..Now, I find you boring. You cover the same old ground, & reveal the same old thing. It's history, get over it & move on..!! S;o) > I'm so pleased that Bookie made you introspective. Possibly it was the > reality check you needed. Uh... have someone read this to you (it explains the 'introspection' post): http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/sarcasm >From now on,. I am looking forward to watching you from a completely > different point of view. One where I can observe rather than react to. Uh huh. Let us know when you start observing without reacting. You're not quite there yet. > . > > I'm so pleased that Bookie made you introspective. nah, he is still in denial i think, it will take more than just a few questions to make him wake up and realise he is a bit of a freak and a social leper with no mates > > . > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > questions to make him wake up and realise he is a bit of a freak and a > social leper with no mates Yeah, your right. This twat isn't worth the typing Bookie. You will never understand him because your not twisted in the head. I think if you want to understand what makes him tock, you would have to go down to his level, & I assure you that it's not worth the bloody hassle he causes f.ck him off!! Simple, that appears to be how you deal with morons here.... >> > . >> [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > f.ck him off!! > Simple, that appears to be how you deal with morons here.... A better phrase STFU a simple but to the point phrase shut the F@ck up > >> > . > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Very well phrased, excellent Matthew.. ROLOL S;o) > On May 4, 8:18 pm, Charlie Wilkes <charlie_wil...@users.easynews.com> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Laughable, really. You'd think they'd never seen a pisstake before. not actually a pisstake i am quet interested in what makes you so dysfunctional and why you feel the need to stalk people and hwat motivates you. what are the positive reinforcers that m,ake you keep comign back for more? do you misread or misunderstand what people are trying to tell you when they say "f.ck off you are a w.nker" and "leave me alone" and other similar things? i am wonmdering whether youhave some kind of bizarre kind of communication disorder or cannot read cretain social signals as most people can do. This often happens with people with Asperger's syndrome, in fact it is pretty much universal with them and can cause them great unhappiness as they can feel very isolated as they are unable to pick up subtle social cues and non-verbal communications which can be very important in leading a normal life and gettign along with others. your response that my questions are a 'pisstake' is very interesting too, tell me why you think i might be taking 'the piss'? what makes you say that? is it denial possibly that you may have a problem? or do you honestly not understand the questions and the sentiment behind them? also have you actually left your house today and interacted with any other human being on a face-to-face basis? thanks in advance, Bookie >> I have so many question I do not know where to start.... > > Oh ferchrissakes bookie. Why don't you just email this guy with some > nekkid pix of yourself in a rowboat? He's obviously got a grip on you > that you can't shake, so you may as well abandon yourself to his pleasure. PMS made me killfile bookie. :( PMS made me do it! wahhhhhhh > >> I have so many question I do not know where to start.... > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > wahhhhhhh that's ok, oscar wilde once said ti was better to laughed at than ignored, maybe it is also better to be killfiled than ignored cos at least that way my presence and my actions have caused some reaction in someone somewhere. ok maybe not, but anything is better than being ignored...ain't that right Nick? isnt; that why you do this? bookie On 5 May, 01:18, Charlie Wilkes <charlie_wil...@users.easynews.com> wrote: > > I have so many question I do not know where to start.... > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Charlie ha ha! > > On May 4, 1:54 am, Charlie Wilkes <charlie_wil...@users.easynews.com> > > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 81 lines] > > bookie Those are certainly probing questions, and I have to tell you that they put me in a contemplative, introspective mood for most of the day. I am sure that with some effort and encouragement, I can become a totally changed person by breakfasttime. Lunch at the latest. (kisses) On 4 May, 06:54, Charlie Wilkes <charlie_wil...@users.easynews.com> wrote: > > I wish that I could say the same thing Bookie. I can't stand the bloody > > idiot, & the more I tell him to F@ck off, he seems to inhale deeply & [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > Charlie > You have neatly summed up the paradox you now face, Sheelagh. On the one > hand, you are bothered by the fact that this guy thinks you actually care > about what he says. But on the other hand, you are validating his sense > of empowerment when you offer a strongly emotional response to his > taunts. And, indeed, he does savor it. It's what he wants and hopes > for. So why do you continue to reward him? I had to think about this one for a while Charlie. I had to question myself and accept what you were telling me was the truth. The reason I empowered him was because I couldn't see that I was doing all of this, to myself. I put shadows where there weren't any & I fled when I felt him approaching..... WHY? I saw more threat than there ever was I guess.... It wasn't until I read both of your posts together that I managed to see the contrast in front of my own eye's..Your right, he will never be anyone to me, there is no reason for the irrational fears that will never materialise. Straight after reading your post, I got the chance to see Nick for what he really is. A big bully boy. Simple.. the sort of person that I encourage my own kids to be a better person than. well the time has come for me to take my own advice & be truthful. I feel ridiculous really, but a much happier person all the same though. I no longer fear him, so his grip on me has gone...It's wonderful. I feel free to be me again. > I don't think this character is particularly malevolent. He will never > spring from the back seat of your car when you are leaving a parking > lot. He's not making threats, or at least he's not making credible > threats, and he's not researching you so he can post private information > about you. He's just a smart-a.s, only as troublesome as you allow him > to be. I know that you are spot on here because I can see it now. He has no hold over me @ all anymore. I don't think his rantings will ever bother me again, because to care, you have to feel, & I no longer feel anything about him - not even anger. It was my fault for allowing him to act this way towards me. I can see that I was encouraging him now.. but no more, ever again..... Thank you Charlie S;o) >> I wish that I could say the same thing Bookie. I can't stand the bloody >> idiot, & the more I tell him to F@ck off, he seems to inhale deeply & [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > taunts. And, indeed, he does savor it. It's what he wants and hopes > for. So why do you continue to reward him? You must be GREAT with children, Charlie. > >> I wish that I could say the same thing Bookie. I can't stand the bloody > >> idiot, & the more I tell him to F@ck off, he seems to inhale deeply & [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > - Show quoted text - I'm more than certain that he is excellent with Children. Charlie is also the self professed God of Troll, so he offered a very good insight as to how a Troll feels & feeds when it's victim posts. An awareness that any non Troll wouldn't be aware of . Therefore it was as helpful as anyone could possibly be to a victim of one. Had he not posted that passage, I could very possibly still be sitting here seething away because of one single person's manipulation. Some people naturally are defensive & introvert, where others are happy to wear their heart on their sleeve's, we are all different from each other. In posting that passage, Charlie gave me the insight I needed to rid myself of that fear. I don't think for one moment that Bookie has the slightest interest in what Nick thinks, or more to the point, what he doesn't think. This passage of her own, was to make it clear to Nick that what he was doing is not normal behaviour. And whilst It would probably make her smile to read it, the only reason that she posted that was to make it as clear as possible to him that what he was doing was not normal behaviour. Nick admitted as much when he said it made him introspective. I am not stupid enough to think this will stop him, but what will change is my response to him, because he doesn't matter anymore. You might find this mildly childishly amusing, but not everyone else feels the same way as you do. My point is that We might not have been in the group that long, but that doesn't mean that you have a right to ridicule us. In fact, all the more reason to support us. You do when it is Barry, the same as we do, so why not us? S. > I'm more than certain that he is excellent with Children. No. I have no children and I lack the patience and enthusiasm to deal with them. The best that can be said is that I am tolerant of children. > Charlie is > also the self professed God of Troll, Hardly. That would imply some kind of paramount success, which is not possible, or at least I have never seen it. "Trolling" is a game with limited scope for improvement and expertise, which is why I eventually tired of it. I had a lot of fun... for example, I insisted that the Apollo Lunar program was a giant hoax, filmed in the desert. Apparently there are people who really do believe that. I got a cheap thrill out of knowing that I was costing the U.S. gov't money in the form of JPL scientists who responded ardently, and voluminously, to silly arguments I concocted on the fly. But, I can only play the same game so many times before it becomes predictable and boring. > I don't think for one moment that Bookie has the slightest interest in > what Nick thinks, or more to the point, what he doesn't think. This > passage of her own, was to make it clear to Nick that what he was doing > is not normal behaviour. Well, darling Sheelagh, do you see the contradiction in this analysis? If Bookie wants to straighten out this guy's thinking, then obviously she does care on some level. You and she can't have it both ways. > You might find this mildly childishly amusing, but not everyone else > feels the same way as you do. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > reason to support us. You do when it is Barry, the same as we do, so why > not us? Oh come on. Do you want pity? You don't need it. You're socially plugged in and you have a stable and supportive family. Nothing this guy can say to you will change your life very much. When this character first showed up, I was inclined, along with everyone else, to tell him to get lost. But the longer this goes on, with people responding to him in copious detail, trying to sleuth out his identity, trying to set him straight on what a prick he is etc. etc., the more I begin to think of him as just one of the regulars, with his own, self- defined niche in the ecosystem of this group. Welcome "Nick Andrews." Have at 'em. They can't control themselves, so why the hell should you? Charlie On 5 May, 21:44, Charlie Wilkes <charlie_wil...@users.easynews.com> wrote: > > I'm more than certain that he is excellent with Children. > [quoted text clipped - 47 lines] > > Charlie i don't actually care about the guy at all, i have very little sympathy for humans at all, actually couldn't give a sh.t about humans and their welfare inthe slightest, but i am interested in the way humans thinks and work mentally thats all. but only fleetingly, when i tune in to this group, i mean thinking about him doesn't keep me awake at night, i have many other things in my life to do that and other sh.t to worry about. such as why jessie insists on sleeping on all my dark rowing training kit in a box onthe floor, it is always covered inher white hairs. also why do I have this niggling pain inthe centre of my back, is it an injury or just aching muscles from training this morning? also whether i shoudl really make an effort to try and rehome terri the tortie or keep her with me and hope that jessie with accept her in time. believe me I couldn't give 2 sh.ts about someone liek this nick bloke, can't believe sheelagh doesn't just go "whatever" whenever he contacts her and block his emails, she has much more to worry about that him > > "Charlie Wilkes" <charlie_wil...@users.easynews.com> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 53 lines] > > - Show quoted text - actually i am kind of interested in what makes Nick 'tick' or rather 'tock', my background in is psychology, albeit cognitive and neuropsych instead of clinical , but I still find that rae very inetresting. also having taught a couple of autistic and aspergers kids i find that whole area quite intriguing as they too have real problems with social interaction and communication. i often wonder what the kids will be liek when they grow up, whethet they will turn into someone like nick who finds it hard to read certain signals and regards any interaction or attention from other peolpe (even negative stuff) as a good thing. also i am guaranteeing that he will not ever try to stalk me, think about it.... > actually i am kind of interested in what makes Nick 'tick' or rather > 'tock', my background in is psychology, albeit cognitive and neuropsych [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > finds it hard to read certain signals and regards any interaction or > attention from other peolpe (even negative stuff) as a good thing. You are conflating the real world with Usenet, Bookie-poo. The mentally handicapped kids are either oblivious to social cues, or else they misread them. On Usenet, the social cues are mostly absent -- as are the negative consequences of socially bad behavior. All we have are strings of ASCII characters, and maybe links to pictures on the web. "Nick" can drop in here for a bit of amusement once or twice a day, amusing himself at your expense with no social consequences whatsoever. Nobody is gonna' fire him from his job because he's a jerk on Usenet. Nobody is gonna punch him in the face because of something he says to you or Sheelagh. People in this group are spending a lot of time trying to figure him out, whereas he spends only a few minutes tossing out replies that are hollow and effortless. And that's the payoff for a troll -- a sense of being a puppet-master, above the fray, looking down with wry amusement whilst the little people scurry about with their egos and emotions in disarray. You are an educated woman. You should fully understand all of this without needing anyone to spell it out for you. Which makes me wonder if "Nick" is the only troll in this group. Maybe I'm falling for a troll act perpetrated by YOU and your voluble cohort Sheelagh. If that's the case, you better fess up because I'm right at the point where I might have to kill myself instead of typing another lengthy explanation like this one. You don't want my innocent, naive blood on your hands, do you? Charlie On 6 May, 00:24, Charlie Wilkes <charlie_wil...@users.easynews.com> wrote: > > actually i am kind of interested in what makes Nick 'tick' or rather > > 'tock', my background in is psychology, albeit cognitive and neuropsych [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > > Charlie yes but why does he bother to coem here and do this and try to wind people up? i am fully aware that he does that, but just wondered why he does, thats all. > On 6 May, 00:24, Charlie Wilkes <charlie_wil...@users.easynews.com> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 40 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Because he is an out & out freak who gets off on manipulating others simply because he "can get away with it here". Over here he is what we would refer to as an antisocial dickhead who should have an ASBO slapped on him to stop him using the net. A true case of a CHAV in action..For the benefit of our American friends, I will explain what these mean, because they obviously don't have them, otherwise they would recognise them. I was hoping for help with that rather than fending the prick off... And I know that you simply don't understand what makes him this way, because I felt the same way too. Now, my eye's are open & I do.... An ASBO is an antisocial behaviour order. It is handed down by the courts here to scruff twats by the neck & try & straighten the savable ones out. It can have any constraints that the bench feel are necessary to stop the bloody idiot doing whatever it is that is getting up other peoples noses..or, affecting other people. Everyone has a right to their normal life here & others Have To RESPECT that. If they don't, then constraints are handed down & f they don't comply with the court ruling, they breach their rights & go straight to jail without passing Go.... A CHAV is a new word, but if you look it up in the Oxford Concise, you will find it there. It is one of those slang words that has actually made it in to the English language for the foreseeable future. I had to check this one out with the kids before I posted because I wanted to be certain I was telling you the true meaning of the word. It stands for: Council House, And Violence- Generally these individuals leave school with no exam's, never work, come from backgrounds where the parents don't work & the family outlook in life is how to con the benefits system & never aspire to any normal sort of life. Violence & rudeness are their trademarks & they never own their own home because it is considered as not important. It doesn't have to be physical violence,... INTIMIDATION is their first rule, & the rest follows in time.... So that is why we don't understand the concept of a troll. We have never had to before. It is new to us & we would appreciate if you were kind enough to point out the things that you have recently explained. How would we ever find out otherwise? We depend on your understanding & explanations, as you do us in different ways... I hope I have been of some help to you. S;o) >> On 6 May, 00:24, Charlie Wilkes <charlie_wil...@users.easynews.com> >> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 84 lines] >I hope I have been of some help to you. >S;o) Does the phrase "Attention Vampire" mean anything to you? Some people have so little going on in their lives that the only attention *anybody* pays them is when they get a reaction to something lame and/or annoying that they post online somewhere. The stake thru the heart for these individuals is to simply ignore whatever drivel they post, no matter what your initial reaction is.... The concept of ASBO probably wouldn't go too far here in the colonies. That pesky constitutional thing pretty much gives anyone the right to *say* or *write* almost anything. There are civil remedies in the courts if someone gets *too* nasty towards a person, but it's doubtful if much of the trollage in Usenet is actionable. Besides, the judges over here are too busy suing their drycleaners for millions of dollars over lost pants and other such nonsense. As far as "CHAV"s, we have cities full of millions of them that are busy breeding legions of future inmates. We just have different names for them... > In article <1178469171.849867.120...@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>, > [quoted text clipped - 111 lines] > > - Show quoted text - ROFLOL..... I see someone has a sense of humour here.. I shall certainly bare this all in mind every time that I post from now on.. It's nice when people explain things from a different point of view... I can't believe people go as far as that, but hey, how sad to have a life where other things are less important than posting on Usenet...what a mad world we live in..!! <LOL> S;o) On May 6, 1:37 pm, clau...@sonic.net (Clod V. Lucas) wrote: > Does the phrase "Attention Vampire" mean anything to you? Nope. Do tell. > Some people have so little going on in their lives that the > only attention *anybody* pays them is when they get a reaction > to something lame and/or annoying that they post online somewhere. Some people have so little going on in their lives that the only attention *anybody* pays them is when their cats mark them as objects in their territory. They then desperately mistake this for love and attention obviously lacking in their lives, and then go off to Usenet to share the news with like-minded pathetic wallflowers. > In article <1178469171.849867.120...@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>, > [quoted text clipped - 111 lines] > > - Show quoted text - i thinkn you call 'chavs' by 'trailer trash' is that correct? same kind of thing really, same useful blood sucking scum who will never really contribute anything to society and will always expect to be provided for as though the world owes them a living, usually thick as pig sh.t, the females tend to get pregnant by the time they are 15 or 16 (this helps them to go to the top of the list for council provided housing and gets them more benefits from the state) males spend their days avoiding work of any sort and dabbling in petty crime. > i thinkn you call 'chavs' by 'trailer trash' is that correct? same > kind of thing really, same useful blood sucking scum who will never [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > housing and gets them more benefits from the state) males spend their > days avoiding work of any sort and dabbling in petty crime. Based on representation in this NG, British women seem to be more than a bit thick. >> In article <1178469171.849867.120...@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>, >> [quoted text clipped - 120 lines] >housing and gets them more benefits from the state) males spend their >days avoiding work of any sort and dabbling in petty crime. "trailer trash" is generally the rural version. There's plenty of those too. They are available in all levels of pigmentation. BTW, You probably meant "useless" rather than "useful", no? > In article <1178499823.879163.181...@e51g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>, > [quoted text clipped - 132 lines] > > - Show quoted text - yes i meant useless as you say, was very early inthe morning when i posted that, had been a very long day but i think you know the general socio-economic group i am referring to >i thinkn you call 'chavs' by 'trailer trash' is that correct? same >kind of thing really, same useful blood sucking scum who will never [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >housing and gets them more benefits from the state) males spend their >days avoiding work of any sort and dabbling in petty crime. Come on Bookie & Sheelagh! I don't post often, but we're supposed to be adults here discussing our cats. Just ignore the posts from those you don't want to read, or better yet, killfile them. Don't keep responding - you must know the saying " don't feed the trolls! " Anyway I'd much rather hear about Ringo or Tortle & I'd be happy to give all kinds of stories about my troublemaker Little Devil. M. >>i thinkn you call 'chavs' by 'trailer trash' is that correct? same >>kind of thing really, same useful blood sucking scum who will never [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > kinds of stories about my troublemaker Little Devil. > M. Hey!! Tortle is mine and I agree with you about not feeding the trolls!! Tortle is doing very well, thank you, and is right now sitting on my mouse pad, supervising as I type! What about a Little Devil story?? I'd rather hear about him/her than trailer trash!! Bonnie > Hey!! Tortle is mine and I agree with you about not feeding the trolls!! > Tortle is doing very well, thank you, and is right now sitting on my mouse > pad, supervising as I type! What about a Little Devil story?? I'd rather > hear about him/her than trailer trash!! Hear hear! Me too. > > Hey!! Tortle is mine and I agree with you about not feeding the trolls!! > > Tortle is doing very well, thank you, and is right now sitting on my mouse > > pad, supervising as I type! What about a Little Devil story?? I'd rather > > hear about him/her than trailer trash!! > > Hear hear! Me too. yes sorry just trying to explain fully the term 'chav' to anyone not from the UK in case the term is used again >>>i thinkn you call 'chavs' by 'trailer trash' is that correct? same >>>kind of thing really, same useful blood sucking scum who will never [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > >Bonnie Whoops! sorry for the mix-up - I enjoy reading your posts & felt badly for you reading about your recent experiences. I know I've looked at pictures of bookie's cats & must have confused who belonged to who. I'm really busy today with some huge non-cat problems, but will post later tonight about my bundle of trouble Little Devil, but I do love him, regardless of what he does. I did sort-of introduce myself & my cats a couple weeks ago, but I'll do it again later. There's lots of pictures of my cats on webshots - Coco & Little Devil http://pets.webshots.com/album/547068108fIJykY and my past cats http://pets.webshots.com/album/556572133OrQNdt M. "mariib via CatKB.com" <u22469@uwe> wrote Coco & Little Devil > http://pets.webshots.com/album/547068108fIJykY and my past cats > http://pets.webshots.com/album/556572133OrQNdt > M. Your cats are beautiful. >>>>i thinkn you call 'chavs' by 'trailer trash' is that correct? same >>>>kind of thing really, same useful blood sucking scum who will never [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > http://pets.webshots.com/album/556572133OrQNdt > M. They're gorgeous!! Little Devil looks like he's full of it--Mr. Personality! Bonnie |
Enable EMail Alerts
Start New Thread
Reply to this Message