Cat Forum / Health and Behavior / April 2007
Iams and Eukanuba cat food
|
|
Thread rating:  |
mlbriggs - 04 Apr 2007 18:09 GMT Today's newspaper carried a full page ad. It confirmed that Iams and Eukanuba dry food is perfectly safe for out pets. MLNB
Lis - 04 Apr 2007 18:30 GMT > Today's newspaper carried a full page ad. It confirmed that Iams and > Eukanuba dry food is perfectly safe for out pets. MLNB It ASSERTS that Eukanuba and Iams dry foods are perfectly safe for our pets. It's probably correct, but a paid advertisement by the company that produces the products is hardly the same thing as independent, objective verification.
Lis
sheelagh - 04 Apr 2007 20:07 GMT > > Today's newspaper carried a full page ad. It confirmed that Iams and > > Eukanuba dry food is perfectly safe for out pets. MLNB [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Lis Is this scare contained to the USA Only?
The reason I ask is because it has hardly been mentioned over here at all.. You would think they would have, judging by the severity of the effect it has had on the USA, Wouldn't you? Which Brands is there to choose from that has not been affected, because looking at the lists, it covers pretty much every one of them now!
It must be ever so worrying for you all. I have to admit that I have been looking out for brands in the shops just waiting for something to be recalled, & trying as hard as we can to avoid the ones that have been affected, just in case... S;o)
Lis - 04 Apr 2007 20:56 GMT > > > Today's newspaper carried a full page ad. It confirmed that Iams and > > > Eukanuba dry food is perfectly safe for out pets. MLNB [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Is this scare contained to the USA Only? It affects the US and Canada. There's a Canadian woman who's very sick because she had a rescue dog who was reluctant to eat. She thought his problem was stress and insecurity, and she ate some of the food to encourage him to eat. It worked, and now they're both seriously ill.
> The reason I ask is because it has hardly been mentioned over here at > all.. > You would think they would have, judging by the severity of the effect > it has had on the USA, Wouldn't you? The scary thing is that the major news media HERE have been very slow to give it any significant coverage. They're only starting to make note of the fact that the "sixteen confirmed deaths" is from the very beginning of the scare and consists mostly of the animals in Menu Foods' feeding trial to determine if the reports they were getting really were caused by their food. In states where the state veterinarian is asking veterinarians to report deaths and illnesses apparently related to the food, there are generally over a hundred each. You can barely tell that from the major news coverage, though.
> Which Brands is there to choose from that has not been affected, > because looking at the lists, it covers pretty much every one of them > now! All the major pet food corporations have something on the recall list. So far there's no actual evidence that ANY dry foods are affected, though, and there are smaller companies that have no foods on the recall list, and companies that don't do business with Menu Foods and/ or don't use any wheat gluten in any of their products.
Foods not on the recall list: http://petsitusa.com/blog/?p=210
The list of foods recalled: http://localhostr.com/files/3b3e7c6af17ef0677e5c.pdf
> It must be ever so worrying for you all. I have to admit that I have > been looking out for brands in the shops just waiting for something to > be recalled, & trying as hard as we can to avoid the ones that have > been affected, just in case... > S;o) It's very scary. The fact that the list has expanded to include foods that were considered "safe" alternatives at the beginning makes everyone even more nervous and more inclined to panic. My new dog--her breeder feeds ONE of her dogs Alpo because she likes it better than what the other dogs are getting. So of course it turns out that this dog's favorite flavor is the exact product that just got added to the recall list. Fortunately, the product codes are different, and the dog appears to be okay, but she's had her last can of Alpo for the foreseeable future, and quite possibly forever.
Whether you're feeding your pets something high-end because you believe it's the highest-quality food for them, or something lower-end because it's what they really like, or what you can afford, you've got a scarily high chance of having made the wrong choice, and accidentally poisoned your pet.
Lis
Lis - 05 Apr 2007 02:43 GMT <snip>
> > Which Brands is there to choose from that has not been affected, > > because looking at the lists, it covers pretty much every one of them [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > recall list, and companies that don't do business with Menu Foods and/ > or don't use any wheat gluten in any of their products. You know, I made a wrong statement here, that needs to be corrected-- and our PETA-believer came along and challenged the wrong statement. There IS one dry food that's affected; Hill's Science Diet M/D, one of their prescription diets, that has also been recalled.
Of course, lack of evidence that any other dry foods are affected is not the same thing as proof that they're safe, either. The recall list has already been expanded several times, and the Science Diet M/D recall breaches the "no dry foods involved" barrier. Everyone's worried.
<snip>
Lis
MikeEisenfeld@yahoo.com - 05 Apr 2007 04:10 GMT >> Is this scare contained to the USA Only? SOME RECALLED PET FOODS IN BELGIUM, OTHER EU NATIONS 03/26/07
Here's a 3/22/07 press release from the Belgian Food Agency: Belgium has imported 40 boxes each containing 24 items. The Food Agency is trying to find out where these products have been sold but has not received any information from the USA supplier as yet. It is also possible that there is more than this amount on the Belgian market, possibly through import from other EU countries. Europe has imported a total of 3440 boxes.
Belgian Food Agency Press Release (in Dutch) http://www.favv-afsca.fgov.be/home/press/doc07/2007-03-22_Menu_foods_nl.pdf http://tinyurl.com/36x7co
PDF translanted from Dutch to English
COMMUNICATION: Serious problems with cat feeding of the American firma menu Foods inc.
The federal food agency FAVV was informed by means of RASFF-systeem (warning system of the European Commission) that a number European lands cat fodder from the United States from the firma menu originating Foods inc had introduced. In the United States kidney problems were determined at cats which have with this feeding. Wet feeding of the mark menu Foods inc. where problems became are determined:
o Choice complete Care Adult Rich in Chicken & Liver o Choice complete Care Adult Rich in Turkey with Broth o Choice complete Care Kitten Rich in Chicken & Liver o Choice complete Care Light Rich in Chicken & Liver o Choice complete Care senior person Rich in Chicken & Turkey o Choice complete Care Kitten with Ocean fish & Tuna o Choice complete Care Kitten Rich in Salmon with o Ocean fish
It will draw lots about this only with packing of 85 gr with as minimum durability dates which those falls between 03/12/2008 and 07/03/2009. Belgium has 40 lays in a coffin with each time 24 items introduced. The food agency tries retrieve where these products are offered buy but until now further information still no of the American firma have received. It can however also be that there on the Belgian market more than this quantity has arrived by import from other European Member States. In sum conducted Europe 3440 lay in a coffin in. Although it concerns here only a limited number of quantities, the food agency wants use here too the precaution principle. Persons who keep cats and that cat feeding will have bought of American produce, to be advised examine if their cat tin feeding was produced by the firma menu Foods Inc. if, however, and these agrees to above data (durability date, 85 gr and ingredients), then brings back she best this feeding to their sale point.
F.A.V.V. WTC III - Simon Bolivarlaan 30 - 1000 Brussel Meldpunt voor de consumenten: Tel. 0800 13550 http://www.favv.be
A.F.S.C.A. WTC III - Bd. Simon Bolivar 30 - 1000 Bruxelles Point de contact pour les consommateurs : Tel. 0800 13550 http://www.afsca.be
sheelagh - 06 Apr 2007 23:22 GMT On 5 Apr, 04:10, MikeEisenf...@yahoo.com wrote:
> >> Is this scare contained to the USA Only? > [quoted text clipped - 56 lines] > A.F.S.C.A. WTC III - Bd. Simon Bolivar 30 - 1000 Bruxelles Point de > contact pour les consommateurs : Tel. 0800 13550http://www.afsca.be Mike, I was wondering whether you have had any updates on the Dutch site that you posted the other day regarding the foods that have been imported from the USA to Europe? I have been looking for information, in particular the Iams pouches of wet food, because all of our crew have been eating that particular brand? It is ever so worrying to think that there are thousands of cans & pouches out there waiting like primed canons waiting to go off. Lis might have some info regarding it too, as she was explaining that some of the food has got through to Canada too, hasn't it? Any news would be good if poss? Many thanks, S;o)
Lis - 07 Apr 2007 23:50 GMT > On 5 Apr, 04:10, MikeEisenf...@yahoo.com wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 74 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Sheelagh,
Sorry I didn't see this earlier. I don't really have more information on the Belgian recall. Canada and the US--for a lot of purposes, that border doesn't exist. Menu is actually a Canadian company, which operates plants in both the US and Canada. There are really only three major pet food manufacturers in North America--actual physical manufacturers, who do contract manufacturing for most of the major brands. The situation is similar for most consumer goods--not necessarily so few manufacturers, but however many they are, they distribute throughout North America. So when something like this happens, it affects the USA, Canada, and often Mexico, too, and just following that is confusing enough. I know that some was exported to Europe, and I believe I've heard that some of the contaminated Chinese wheat gluten went to the Netherlands or through the Netherlands, but I don't know enough details to be useful to anyone. Sorry.:(
Lis
Lynne - 08 Apr 2007 02:50 GMT > I know that some was exported to > Europe, and I believe I've heard that some of the contaminated Chinese > wheat gluten went to the Netherlands or through the Netherlands, but I > don't know enough details to be useful to anyone. Damn. How scary for people in those countries! I hope that information is clarified and soon.
Sheelagh, I'd take to reading labels and avoid anything with wheat gluten. Read your treat labels, too.
 Signature Lynne
sheelagh - 08 Apr 2007 14:32 GMT > > I know that some was exported to > > Europe, and I believe I've heard that some of the contaminated Chinese [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > -- > Lynne Lynne, we are being told nothing...Zilch, Zero about this pet food scare at all. In fact I can't even think of a single news broadcast relating to this incident in any of the news bulletins...& I am an avid news watcher, so if there had been, I would have noticed it. It hasn't even been mentioned as a problem that is occurring in the states either.
All of the information that I am getting is through news groups such as un. In fact the only reason that I know that it has reached Europe, is because of a previous Dutch poster, telling us that it has reached the Netherlands, & translating a Cat Food Warning link that they have been notified about.
Unfortunately, no one seems to know where the (3400??) cases of food have gone to, hence the panic. I have tried going through the food standards agencies and they have nothing to alert us that there is even a problem, never mind who or where might be affected!!
I am going to take your advice though and avoid Anything with wheat or gluten in it. Mine normally eat a diet of Iams dry for daytime grazing & also whiskers super meat wet food x twice daily. Have you any idea if either of them are affected at all? Thanks for the advice, I will act on it this week @ Pets @ Home when I go and get the moggies food in.
S;o)
imloafin - 04 Apr 2007 21:49 GMT > > Today's newspaper carried a full page ad. It confirmed that Iams and > > Eukanuba dry food is perfectly safe for out pets. MLNB [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Lis Iams "dry" is suspected in a cat's death, details here:
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewNation.asp?Page=/Nation/archive/200704/NAT20070403a.html
Matthew - 04 Apr 2007 22:29 GMT No it is not PETA got a report and passed it on. Anything that PETA has to do with is subject to suspicion
>> > Today's newspaper carried a full page ad. It confirmed that Iams and >> > Eukanuba dry food is perfectly safe for out pets. MLNB [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewNation.asp?Page=/Nation/archive/200704/NAT20070403a.html imloafin - 05 Apr 2007 01:43 GMT > No it is not PETA got a report and passed it on. Anything that PETA has to > do with is subject to suspicion [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > - Show quoted text - hi "Matthew", thanks for weighing-in on this subject.
You assert:
Quote: "No it is not...
Assuming you are referring to the "suspected" reference; if the pet owner suspects the pet's death is diet related, then the suspicion has merit - until proved, or, disproved. A suspicious death is just that: suspicious. All evidence is to be considered.
Quote cont'd.: ...PETA got a report and passed it on."
Apparently, that is the scenario: a reiteration of a published news story.
Quote: "Anything that PETA has to do with is subject to suspicion(.)"
While their reputation and motivation may be a topic for a different debate, that story alerted me to another case - glaringly - similar to mine!
Read: My young cat became deathly ill with acute respiratory arrest after consuming from a - fresh bag - of Iams dry food. (Previous bags were consumed without incident.)
Tragically, my vet recommended euthanasia due to the suffering.
Coincidence of case? Perhaps. Then, perhaps not.
This matter indicates further investigation and evaluation, replete with laboratory analysis of food samples, possible autopsy or diagnosis of tissue specimens.
I'm attempting to contact the pet owner in the story to compare product label dates and codes, vet notes, etc.
If a correlation can be established, a Warning Notice broad-casted, then other pet owners may come forward with similar reports. Presently, the owners may not correlate the advertised-as-safe dry food with an illness or death!
I have documents in-hand.
Matthew - 05 Apr 2007 03:24 GMT >> No it is not PETA got a report and passed it on. Anything that PETA has >> to [quoted text clipped - 66 lines] > > I have documents in-hand. After you have all the above done and have documents in hand in terms real proof.
I will be one of the first to be out there broadcasting the problems. Also please except my sorrows for the passing of your furball.
Ps. good luck getting information from PETA be ready for them to use your story as a building block for more advertisement for them.
imloafin - 05 Apr 2007 05:12 GMT > >> No it is not PETA got a report and passed it on. Anything that PETA has > >> to [quoted text clipped - 81 lines] > > - Show quoted text - hi "Matthew", thanks for a reply, offer of support and the condolences.
I have in-hand: The remaining nearly-full bag of fresh Iams "dry" food in question, purchase receipt (previous receipts, too), vet's billing statement of all medical treatments, recent photos of a healthy pet.
The "other" pet owner has an unlisted phone number, the only other listing in the same city (a relative?) with the same last name has a disconnected phone number. I'll continue trying thru other methods.
I have no interest in being exploited by any "Cause's cause." If tainted pet food is proveable, or convincingly suspect, I'll promptly be in direct communication with the FDA via formal legal channels: the attorney general's office in my state!
Lis - 04 Apr 2007 22:36 GMT > > > Today's newspaper carried a full page ad. It confirmed that Iams and > > > Eukanuba dry food is perfectly safe for out pets. MLNB [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewNation.asp?Page=/Nation/archive/200704/NAT... According to PETA--not exactly a reliable source, and not exactly a friend to pets and pet owners. They routinely kill surrendered pets that the former owners expected that PETA, being an "animal rights organization" would rehome, because PETA believes it's an insupportable affront to any animal to live in close dependence on humans. PETA's goal is that we should have NO pets; the purpose of their current antics is to convince pet owners that there is NOTHING we can safely feed our pets.
And no, a grieving pet owner, with no supporting veterinary information, and no information at all about the cat's age or previous health, is not evidence, either. A two-year-old cat with kidney failure raises suspicion of toxicity somewhere as one serious possibility; a sixteen-year-old cat with kidney failure simply does not, not unless there's other evidence to suggest it. The cat's age and previous condition are not mentioned; just the final diagnosis. And details matter: Ten years ago, my four-year-old cat died suddenly of acute renal failure. Should I have suspected tainted food? Well, maybe--except that it was the same food I was feeding my other two cats, who were fine, and the cat that died was the runt of her litter, always tiny and with close to zero body fat. She had congenital defects in her internal organs, and four years was just all that was in her. The cat mentioned in the story may have been like her, or may have been a vigorous, healthy two-year-old, or may have been an otherwise-healthy but elderly fifteen-year-old. We don't know. The story gives us nothing, except the pet owner's grief, and PETA's shameless exploitation of it.
Lis
IBen Getiner - 09 Apr 2007 08:59 GMT > > Today's newspaper carried a full page ad. It confirmed that Iams and > > Eukanuba dry food is perfectly safe for out pets. MLNB [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Lis Bullshit. It's BETTER. These people are sticking their financial necks out one the line. If they make this claim publicly and it turns out to be wrong, they're finished. And they know this going in. They wouldn't make this kind of a statement unless they were 100 percent sure. And that's a move rooted in financial survival. A commodity that I would put above and beyond any independent 'anything', anywhere anyplace anytime. This particular kind of money don't talk... it SWEARS. And when it comes to my pets, that's a language that's good enough for me.
IBen
|
|
|