Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / Health and Behavior / March 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Pet-food recall: 769 Dead Pets

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
MikeEisenfeld@yahoo.com - 22 Mar 2007 15:51 GMT
Gasp!

Pet-food recall: Thursday-morning numbers
>From the PetConnection.com database. 6 a.m. PT:

Total reports of sick or dead pets: 1529
Deceased pets: 769
Of those:

Cats, deceased: 460
Dogs, deceased: 309
http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/03/22/pet-food-recall-the-latest-numbers/
Matthew - 22 Mar 2007 16:53 GMT
I think it is just like the comments were stating  fueling the fire and are
way out in the numbers.  I think HSUS, ASPCA and specially PETA would be
going nuts right now if the numbers had gone that high over night.  The sick
cat part I can see but the deaths  the media would be having a frenzy right
now

> Gasp!
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Dogs, deceased: 309
> http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/03/22/pet-food-recall-the-latest-numbers/
PawsForThought - 22 Mar 2007 18:24 GMT
> I think it is just like the comments were stating  fueling the fire and are
> way out in the numbers.  I think HSUS, ASPCA and specially PETA would be
> going nuts right now if the numbers had gone that high over night.  The sick
> cat part I can see but the deaths  the media would be having a frenzy right
> now

Exactly.  I would like to see some proof of these numbers.
MikeEisenfeld@yahoo.com - 22 Mar 2007 18:53 GMT
> I think it is just like the comments were stating  fueling the fire and are
> way out in the numbers.  I think HSUS, ASPCA and specially PETA would be
> going nuts right now if the numbers had gone that high over night.  The sick
> cat part I can see but the deaths  the media would be having a frenzy right
> now

Do you think the owners of these recently deceased animals in MANY of
these googled news stories aren't for real?
http://tinyurl.com/3a3lvw

Food recalls are not an animal cruelty issue, so AR groups aren't yet
involved much with this crisis. Though I'm sure when all is said and
done, they'll get their "licks" in when the opportunity arises.

I think at that point, the numbers WILL end-up being so much higher.

I pray I'm wrong.

> <MikeEisenf...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
MikeEisenfeld@yahoo.com - 22 Mar 2007 19:13 GMT
On Mar 22, 1:53 pm, MikeEisenf...@yahoo.com wrote:

> > I think it is just like the comments were stating  fueling the fire and are
> > way out in the numbers.  I think HSUS, ASPCA and specially PETA would be
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Food recalls are not an animal cruelty issue, so AR groups aren't yet
> involved much with this crisis.

Oops Looks like PeTA's just got they're licks in.
http://www.pr-inside.com/peta-calls-for-cruelty-investigation-into-r73704.htm

PeTA never liked Menu foods anyways.
http://www.peta.org/feat/iams/menu-mfg.html

Though I'm sure when all is said and
> done, they'll get their "licks" in when the opportunity arises.
Matthew - 22 Mar 2007 20:25 GMT
PETA has been after IAMS For years  nothing new

> On Mar 22, 1:53 pm, MikeEisenf...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> PeTA never liked Menu foods anyways.
> http://www.peta.org/feat/iams/menu-mfg.html

> Though I'm sure when all is said and
>> done, they'll get their "licks" in when the opportunity arises.
Cat Protector - 22 Mar 2007 20:58 GMT
PETA is a radical group and I don't take much stock in what they say. In
fact, they are nothing more than hypocrites.

Signature

Cat Galaxy: All Cats! All The Time!
www.catgalaxymedia.com

Panther TEK: Staying On Top Of Your Computer Needs!
www.panthertekit.com

> PETA has been after IAMS For years  nothing new
>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>> Though I'm sure when all is said and
>>> done, they'll get their "licks" in when the opportunity arises.
Matthew - 22 Mar 2007 21:19 GMT
I have to agree with you on that 1000%

> PETA is a radical group and I don't take much stock in what they say. In
> fact, they are nothing more than hypocrites.
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>>> Though I'm sure when all is said and
>>>> done, they'll get their "licks" in when the opportunity arises.
Gandalf - 23 Mar 2007 00:37 GMT
>PETA is a radical group and I don't take much stock in what they say. In
>fact, they are nothing more than hypocrites.

No kidding:

http://www.petakillsanimals.com/
MikeEisenfeld@yahoo.com - 22 Mar 2007 19:19 GMT
On Mar 22, 1:53 pm, MikeEisenf...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Food recalls are not an animal cruelty issue, so AR groups aren't yet
> involved much with this crisis. Though I'm sure when all is said and
> done, they'll get their "licks" in when the opportunity arises.

Oops Looks like PeTA's just got they're licks in.
http://www.pr-inside.com/peta-calls-for-cruelty-investigation-into-r7...

PeTA never liked Iams or Menu foods anyways.
http://www.peta.org/feat/iams/menu-mfg.html

> I think at that point, the numbers WILL end-up being so much higher.
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
MikeEisenfeld@yahoo.com - 22 Mar 2007 19:23 GMT
On Mar 22, 2:19 pm, MikeEisenf...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Oops Looks like PeTA's just got they're licks in.http://www.pr-inside.com/peta-calls-for-cruelty-investigation-into-r7...

Corrected link
http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/03-22-200
7/0004551456&EDATE
=
Cheryl - 22 Mar 2007 23:35 GMT
On Thu 22 Mar 2007 10:51:04a,  wrote in rec.pets.cats.health+behav
<news:1174575064.122597.164660@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>:

> Gasp!
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/03/22/pet-food-recall-the-
> latest-numbers/

Since kidney disease is probably one of the number one killer of
cats other than outdoor dangers, I suspect people are falsely
attributing death and illness to this latest pet food
contamination.  I really hope I'm wrong about that.  I didn't click
the link because it says "blog" in it, and a blog is usually just
someone's opinion or writing with nothing to back it up.

Signature

Cheryl

Paulette - 23 Mar 2007 01:13 GMT
You all should have watched ABC evening news...Charlie Gibson....tonite
a report from the largest animal hospital in New York,, with a huge
increase in acute kidney failure cases; 200 so far for just this one
facility. The vet said it may end up with thousands; many laboratories
across the country are testing the food, no results, but even suspect
residual insecticides  Last nite another private vet hospital quoted a
web site (sorry, I didn't catch the name) that listed 250 deaths so far.
Cheryl - 23 Mar 2007 02:10 GMT
> You all should have watched ABC evening news...Charlie
> Gibson....tonite a report from the largest animal hospital in
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> web site (sorry, I didn't catch the name) that listed 250 deaths
> so far.

Thanks for letting us know, Paulette.  I wished I'd seen that.  I
wish I knew how prevalent ARF is now, before the MF contamination.
I'd also like to know the death rate of ARF prior to this latest
news. I still think that the average person isn't going to look for
signs of RF until they were told to. Tainted food or not.

Signature

Cheryl

CatNipped - 23 Mar 2007 15:14 GMT
>> You all should have watched ABC evening news...Charlie
>> Gibson....tonite a report from the largest animal hospital in
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> news. I still think that the average person isn't going to look for
> signs of RF until they were told to. Tainted food or not.

Everything I've seen on reputable news sites, newspapers, and television
news says that there are only 10 "confirmed" deaths (9 cats, 1 dog), but one
source quotes Stephen F. Sundlof, director of the FDA's Center for
Veterinary Medicine, "We anticipate those numbers will increase as the
investigation continues.  We're getting information constantly, and we're
trying to put all the pieces together."
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-petfoods20mar20,1,2840227.s
tory?track=rss


Any time something like this happens rumors start to fly and the story
suddenly gets "bigger".  I'm not denying that this is a serious concern for
pet owners, or that it shouldn't be investigated thoroughly, but neither
should it be the cause of major panic.

Hugs,

CatNipped
zinzee - 23 Mar 2007 02:33 GMT
> You all should have watched ABC evening news...Charlie Gibson....tonite
> a report from the largest animal hospital in New York,, with a huge
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> residual insecticides  Last nite another private vet hospital quoted a
> web site (sorry, I didn't catch the name) that listed 250 deaths so far.

It's the New York Animal Medical Center.  They are an amazing place
with a wealth of qualified specialists.  They are a teaching hospital,
as well.  They are definitely expensive but are open 24 hours and the
staff is very qualified, attentive, and someone is always there
willing to give you answers.  They will even quote prices over the
phone and there is nothing wishy-washy about this place.  Plus, the
center itself is non-profit.  More info at http://www.amcny.org/.

Anyhow, a summary to the article can be found at http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/story?id=2974319.

Thanks for the post, Paulette!

Best,
Heather
MikeEisenfeld@yahoo.com - 23 Mar 2007 03:15 GMT
Pet-food recall: Thursday update
>From the PetConnection.com database. 11:20 a.m. PT:

Total reports of sick or dead pets: 1715
Deceased pets: 845
Of those:

Cats, deceased: 500
Dogs, deceased: 345
http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/03/22/pet-food-recall-thursday-update/

> > You all should have watched ABC evening news...Charlie Gibson....tonite
> > a report from the largest animal hospital in New York,, with a huge
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> Best,
> Heather
Matthew - 23 Mar 2007 03:23 GMT
Again that is only a BLOG website  stating those numbers none have been
confirmed  not saying it is not true.  But it would have already made
national headlines if the numbers were that high.  The media would be having
a field day with it

> Pet-food recall: Thursday update
>>From the PetConnection.com database. 11:20 a.m. PT:
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>> Best,
>> Heather
Lorraine - 23 Mar 2007 17:25 GMT
>Again that is only a BLOG website  stating those numbers none have been
>confirmed  not saying it is not true.  But it would have already made
>national headlines if the numbers were that high.  The media would be having
>a field day with it

I thought they already were having a field day.  However, I know of two
people locally who have been affected greatly by this fiasco with two
cats gone, and one seriously ill, all kidney problems.  All the
illnesses have been recent enough that they still had the tainted food
on their shelves at home. The oldest cat was 9 years old.

I guess that could be a coincidence, but one has to wonder.  I don't
know how the product distribution works, but I live fifty-some miles
from the Emporia, KS plant, and perhaps there is a higher concentration
of the bad cans in this area.  All in all, throughout the country, I
really don't think those numbers are all that inflated.

L.
Lynne - 23 Mar 2007 17:35 GMT
on Fri, 23 Mar 2007 16:25:33 GMT, Lorraine <remtoxicvapor@remyahoo.com>
wrote:

> I thought they already were having a field day.  However, I know of two
> people locally who have been affected greatly by this fiasco with two
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> of the bad cans in this area.  All in all, throughout the country, I
> really don't think those numbers are all that inflated.

I expect the numbers will drastically increase over what is being
reported in the media right now.  In fact, I have absolutely no doubt.

The so-called blog website is actually a database of owner reported
cases.  The website has disclaimers about the inaccuracy of this type of
reporting and they also encourage people to report to the FDA.  I tend to
believe the numbers on this website are closer to being accurate than
what the media is reporting, though I'm also sure they are probably high.  
It's obvious the media is reporting the numbers they are getting from
Menu Foods and are WAY low.  Can anyone say "DUH?"

This is a f.cking nightmare.

Signature

Lynne

Kittie Kat - 23 Mar 2007 20:04 GMT
> on Fri, 23 Mar 2007 16:25:33 GMT, Lorraine <remtoxicva...@remyahoo.com>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> --
> Lynne

According to the San Fran Chronicle, the FDA has said they don't want
reporting. (Typical of the FDA...they're too busy taking kickbacks)
They supposedly told vets NOT to report. Not interested I guess.

Now that they know the culprit, I hope there's a way to test batches
of food. Won't surprise me to see more foods added to the list.
Lynne - 23 Mar 2007 20:30 GMT
on Fri, 23 Mar 2007 19:04:46 GMT, "Kittie Kat" <forward123123@gmail.com>
wrote:

> (Typical of the FDA...they're too busy taking kickbacks)

you hit that nail on the head.  <spit>

Signature

Lynne

Cheryl - 24 Mar 2007 02:56 GMT
> It's obvious the media is reporting the numbers they are getting
> from Menu Foods and are WAY low.  Can anyone say "DUH?"

Menu food is only attributing the cats and the dog that were part of
a taste test, and they eliminated at least one death because the cat
(s) were indoor/outdoor, thus it can't be proven that they didn't get
poisoned from something other than food.  Tis true, but unfortunate
that it can't be proven.

Signature

Cheryl

Matthew - 23 Mar 2007 17:43 GMT
>>Again that is only a BLOG website  stating those numbers none have been
>>confirmed  not saying it is not true.  But it would have already made
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> L.

As I said "not say it is not true"  but I will wait for a reliable and
confirmed source other than a BLOG website before I even consider the
numbers.  The ASPCA is working on the stats as we speak to find out the
numbers according to their website.
I know the numbers are going to be high  but  I will not fall or be gullible
to a site that is a opinion website where opinion other than facts are
stated.  In the other groups there are a lot of whacko coming out trying to
get 5 minutes of fame and the possibilities money.  Locally we had a news
reporter that came back on the air and apologize for running a spot  where a
local lady said her cat died  and she had the food still; it was tested it
was not even the same brands that were on the recall and the food was fine.
The lady was screaming she was going to do a lawsuit against the pet
companies now she is under investigation for filing false reports.

My sorrows go out to the ones that have lost and my prayers are for the ones
that are sick
Lynne - 23 Mar 2007 19:30 GMT
on Fri, 23 Mar 2007 16:43:38 GMT, "Matthew"
<Iamacatslave@proudtoserve.com> wrote:

>  Locally we had a news
> reporter that came back on the air and apologize for running a spot
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> lawsuit against the pet companies now she is under investigation for
> filing false reports. \

I hatehateHATE people who pull that sh.t.  In fact, HATE isn't a strong
enough word.  There are animals and people who love them suffering beyond
description, and then you get these lowlifes pulling this crap... ARGH!

> My sorrows go out to the ones that have lost and my prayers are for
> the ones that are sick

Ditto

Signature

Lynne

buglady - 24 Mar 2007 16:11 GMT
> > http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/03/22/pet-food-recall-the-
I didn't click
> the link because it says "blog" in it, and a blog is usually just
> someone's opinion or writing with nothing to back it up.

Pet Connection is Dr. Mary Becker site.  Becker is the vet they talk to on
Today show.

buglady
take out the dog before replying
Cheryl - 24 Mar 2007 23:55 GMT
> Pet Connection is Dr. Mary Becker site.  Becker is the vet they
> talk to on Today show.

Cool, thanks.  I'll check it out.

Signature

Cheryl

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.