Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / Health and Behavior / February 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Revolution for cats

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Lynne - 26 Jan 2007 00:56 GMT
The new vet thinks the cats should be on Revolution instead of
FrontlinePlus and Interceptor.  It would certainly be simpler and less
expensive, but I hate to fix something that isn't broken.  The vet only
suggested this because Revolution covers ear mites.  This doesn't concern
me since they are indoor only and have never had them.

That said, I'm still willing to look into Revolution.  Anyone here use it?  
What are your experiences with it--good, bad or neutral?

Signature

Lynne

cindys - 26 Jan 2007 01:43 GMT
> The new vet thinks the cats should be on Revolution instead of
> FrontlinePlus and Interceptor.  It would certainly be simpler and less
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> That said, I'm still willing to look into Revolution.  Anyone here use it?
> What are your experiences with it--good, bad or neutral?
--------------
Yes, my vet used it on my cats when our new foster turned out to have fleas.
Quick and easy. Snip off the tip of the tube. Rub it on the cat's skin
between the shoulder blades. No more fleas.
Best regards,
---Cindy S.
MaryL - 26 Jan 2007 01:54 GMT
> The new vet thinks the cats should be on Revolution instead of
> FrontlinePlus and Interceptor.  It would certainly be simpler and less
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> That said, I'm still willing to look into Revolution.  Anyone here use it?
> What are your experiences with it--good, bad or neutral?

Revolution is one of the most frequently-recommended flea pareparations,
largely because of what you were told.  However, I used it on only one
occasion and would *never* use it again.  First, I used it on Holly.  It
annoyed her, but I discounted that because she really doe not like to have
*any* medication.  Then, I put it on poor Duffy.  As soon as the Frontline
was applied, he jumped straight up in the air and began to run in circles in
full speed.  He was in total panic, and I was also in a panic because Duffy
is blind and I was afraid he would run head-on into something and injure
himself.  He actually did hit the wall or furniture a few times before I
could grab him because he was running at such a high rate of speed that I
couldn't get to him.  It is very unusual for Duffy to become disoriented or
hit something, but he was so stressed-out and frightened that he obviously
didn't know what he was doing.  I took the remaining doses back to the vet
and asked about the reaction.  I was told that his reaction was extremely
rare, but they has had other reports to a much lighter extent.  They
*guessed* that it might have felt extremely cold to the cats and startled
them.

I have not needed to use any flea preparation more than a few times, but I
used Advantage on every other occasion and have never had any problems with
it.  I know my experience is unusual, but it is something you might want to
consider or ask your vet about.

MaryL
Lynne - 26 Jan 2007 02:12 GMT
on Fri, 26 Jan 2007 01:54:59 GMT, "MaryL"
<stancole1@yahoo.comTAKE-OUT-THE-LITTER> wrote:

> Revolution is one of the most frequently-recommended flea
> pareparations, largely because of what you were told.  However, I used
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> As soon as the Frontline was applied, he jumped straight up in the air
> and began to run in circles in full speed.

I'm confused, was it Revolution or Frontline?  (You say both above.)

That sounds like a horrible reaction, poor Duffy!  But please do let me
know which it was.

The thing about Revolution is that it's more than just a flea treatment.  
It's also a heartworm and intestinal worm treatment.  I give my cats
Interceptor for heartworm and intestinal worms, every month along with
their Frontline for fleas, but giving them one treatment instead of two is
appealing.  Though the reaction Duffy had, if it was indeed Revolution, is
pretty awful and concerns me.

Signature

Lynne

MaryL - 26 Jan 2007 02:51 GMT
> on Fri, 26 Jan 2007 01:54:59 GMT, "MaryL"
> <stancole1@yahoo.comTAKE-OUT-THE-LITTER> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> appealing.  Though the reaction Duffy had, if it was indeed Revolution, is
> pretty awful and concerns me.

Sorry...I think I have done that before, for some reason.  It was Revolution
that I used.  I also had Frontline in mind because that is the 3rd product
that I most often see mentioned.  I kept the bill from that occasion just so
I could always be sure of what I used.  I re-checked just now, and it was
Revolution (Blue Package for cats 5.1 to 15 lb.).  I have never used
Frontline (and rarely need any flea preparation because my two are indoor
only).

Thanks for pointing out the error.

MaryL

MaryL
Lynne - 26 Jan 2007 03:13 GMT
on Fri, 26 Jan 2007 02:51:37 GMT, "MaryL" <stancole1@yahoo.comTAKE-OUT-THE-
LITTER> wrote:

> Thanks for pointing out the error.

Mary, thank you for clarifying.  I really appreciate it.  I'm going to do
some research before I change anything.  The thought of your sweet Duffy
going nuts like that is very alarming.

My cats are indoor cats, too, but my dog goes outside of course.  Even
though she gets Frontline, I've seen fleas on the cats on occasion, so they
get it, too, just not as often.  They do get the heartworm/intestinal worm
preventative monthly, though, year round.  Worms creep me out.

Signature

Lynne

cindys - 26 Jan 2007 02:53 GMT
>> The new vet thinks the cats should be on Revolution instead of
>> FrontlinePlus and Interceptor.  It would certainly be simpler and less
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> lighter extent.  They *guessed* that it might have felt extremely cold to
> the cats and startled them.
---------
I'm wondering if it was the smell. Amanda, my calico, who tends to be
skittish in general was not the least bit happy about the application of the
Revolution (although her reaction was not as extreme as Duffy's). Many years
ago, some of my perfume accidently got on Molly, and she went crazy for
several minutes. Recently, our foster unfortunately got a little too close
to our dinner candles and singed the tips of his whiskers and a small patch
of fur (fortunately, he didn't get burned, but it was still terrifying). The
smell of the singed fur was bad. He went bonkers, chasing and attacking the
other cats for several minutes. I'm wondering if Duffy was taken by
surprise, reacted to the smell, and then his blindness may have exacerbated
the situation.
Best regards,
---Cindy S.

> I have not needed to use any flea preparation more than a few times, but I
> used Advantage on every other occasion and have never had any problems
> with it.  I know my experience is unusual, but it is something you might
> want to consider or ask your vet about.
>
> MaryL
Lynne - 26 Jan 2007 03:16 GMT
on Fri, 26 Jan 2007 02:53:22 GMT, "cindys" <cstein1@rochester.rr.com>
wrote:

> Recently, our foster unfortunately got a little too close
> to our dinner candles and singed the tips of his whiskers and a small
> patch of fur (fortunately, he didn't get burned, but it was still
> terrifying).

That happened to Rudy last year, but he only burned his whiskers.  A couple
of his whiskers are still a bit frayed on the ends.  Now candles are high
on the mantle (but only until Levi figures out how to get up there, and I
know he will...).

> The smell of the singed fur was bad. He went bonkers,
> chasing and attacking the other cats for several minutes. I'm
> wondering if Duffy was taken by surprise, reacted to the smell, and
> then his blindness may have exacerbated the situation.

That's a very good point.  The smell along with the feel of it may have
frightened him that badly.  Poor thing.  My cats don't like the Frontline,
but they know what I'm doing before I do it, so they grin and bear it.  
Duffy didn't have any idea, so that might explain it.

Signature

Lynne

Gail Futoran - 26 Jan 2007 03:59 GMT
> The new vet thinks the cats should be on Revolution instead of
> FrontlinePlus and Interceptor.  It would certainly be simpler and
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> use it?
> What are your experiences with it--good, bad or neutral?

5 or 6 years ago my vet recommended Revolution.
I've used the kitten version on kittens with no
problems, and the adult version on all my adult and
senior cats, including one 18 year old.  Several of
the cats go outdoors for brief periods under
supervision, but that's enough exposure that I prefer
the more comprehensive treatment of Revolution.

Gail F.
Annie Wxill - 26 Jan 2007 04:48 GMT
> The new vet thinks the cats should be on Revolution instead of
> FrontlinePlus and Interceptor.  It would certainly be simpler and less
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> That said, I'm still willing to look into Revolution.  Anyone here use it?
> What are your experiences with it--good, bad or neutral?

We live in an area that has heartworms and fleas.  We used to use Advantage
for fleas and Heartgard for heartworms. Advantage is drops that are applied
to between the shoulder blades and Heartgard is a rather large tablet that
they are supposed to eat.  I had to break the Heartgard apart and put it in
their food, but they didn't like it and I had a hard time convincing them to
eat it.  Both are administered once a month.

Heartworm protection is recommended, even for indoor cats because mosquitoes
do come inside.

I was happy to switch them to Revolution because it is applied the same as
Advantage and also protects against heartworms, as well as other parasites.

The cats don't like it about the same as they don't like Advantage.  But,
neither has had a bad reaction except to run away after it is applied.  We
have to sneak up on them because they know when we open the little vial.  I
suspect there are some sort of fumes or odor that tips them off.

Apparently, the heartworm protection is important now, even in areas not
associated with it.  When we were visiting relatives in Washington State, we
saw an article in the local paper that heartworm had been diagnosed for the
first time in the area, and the pets had not been to heartworm infested
areas.  The vet interviewed thought that pets that were rescued because of
Hurricane Katrina brought it with them and local mosquitoes bit those pets
and passed it on to local pets.

Who knows?

Hope this helps.

Annie
MaryL - 26 Jan 2007 10:59 GMT
>> The new vet thinks the cats should be on Revolution instead of
>> FrontlinePlus and Interceptor.  It would certainly be simpler and less
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
>
> Annie

I also use Heartgard once a month.  I live in East Texas, so it is important
to use it year-round.  My cats are indoor only, so they are not as likely to
have heart worms a an outdoor cat -- but I am sure that everyone here
realizes that it is always possible for a mosquito to get indoors (even
though I have never seen one in my house).  Heart worms are not seen as
frequently in cats as in dogs, but it seems to be becoming more common, and
the death rate is even higher in cats if they do become infected.

My cats don't like the taste of Heartgard, either.  Fortunately, the large
table is easy to crumble (but it can't simply be "ground up" because it is
rather soft and pliable).  They won't readily eat it if I simply add it to
their regular food, but they will eat it if I mix it with some tuna.  I use
Advantage on the rare occasions when I need to use flea treatment, but that
is indeed seldom.

MaryL
yngver - 26 Jan 2007 18:25 GMT
On Jan 26, 4:59 am, "MaryL" <stanco...@yahoo.comTAKE-OUT-THE-LITTER>
wrote:

> >> The new vet thinks the cats should be on Revolution instead of
> >> FrontlinePlus and Interceptor.  It would certainly be simpler and less
[quoted text clipped - 56 lines]
>
> MaryL

Actually I've read that more than 50 percent of cats diagnosed with
heartworm are indoor-only cats--most likely because their owners think
indoor cats are at less risk of heartworm and so don't give them any
preventatives.
-yngver
Lynne - 26 Jan 2007 14:05 GMT
on Fri, 26 Jan 2007 04:48:09 GMT, "Annie Wxill"
<Annie_Wxill@hotmail.com> wrote:

> We live in an area that has heartworms and fleas.  We used to use
> Advantage for fleas and Heartgard for heartworms. Advantage is drops
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
> Hope this helps.

I am religious about protecting my cats and my dog from heartworm.  There
is no way I will risk putting my animals through heartworm when it is SO
easily prevented.

Thanks for your post--it does help.  I think I will give Revolution a
try.  For anyone using Heartguard, I suggest you look into Interceptor.  
The tablets are small and my cats barely notice when I pill them (and I
just shove them in their throat and hold their head up).

Signature

Lynne

yngver - 26 Jan 2007 18:14 GMT
> > The new vet thinks the cats should be on Revolution instead of
> > FrontlinePlus and Interceptor.  It would certainly be simpler and less
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
>
> Annie

We use Revolution for the same reason, for heartworm protection. We
have been using it every year for about the past 5-6 years. No
problems. We are in the north so we only use it spring through fall,
mosquito season. Our cats have never had fleas so that was not the
issue. However, we took in a stray cat a couple years ago who had a
terrible case of ear mites and we were glad our other two cats were on
Revolution to protect them against ear mites.

Our cats don't really mind the Revolution application, other than one
of them who doesn't like to be held still for the few moments it takes
to apply it. And anyway, it's only once a month, and so much easier
than trying to get a Heartgard pill down their throats.

My advice would be to try it and see. If your cats don't mind it, it
probably is a better choice than flea products because it does protect
against heartworm, ear mites, and other nasty things.
-yngver
Phil P. - 26 Jan 2007 12:15 GMT
> The new vet thinks the cats should be on Revolution instead of
> FrontlinePlus and Interceptor.  It would certainly be simpler and less
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> That said, I'm still willing to look into Revolution.  Anyone here use it?
> What are your experiences with it--good, bad or neutral?

I didn't find Revolution very effective against fleas. I'd stick with
Frontline or Advantage.

Phil
Lynne - 26 Jan 2007 14:06 GMT
> I didn't find Revolution very effective against fleas. I'd stick with
> Frontline or Advantage.

Really?  Hmmmm.  I think I will try anyway.  The cats stay indoors and the
dog will stay on Frontline.  Since the dog is the vehicle for fleas, maybe
we will be okay.

Signature

Lynne

Phil P. - 26 Jan 2007 14:18 GMT
> > I didn't find Revolution very effective against fleas. I'd stick with
> > Frontline or Advantage.
>
> Really?  Hmmmm.  I think I will try anyway.  The cats stay indoors and the
> dog will stay on Frontline.  Since the dog is the vehicle for fleas, maybe
> we will be okay.

I hope so.

Good luck,

Phil
yngver - 26 Jan 2007 18:22 GMT
> > I didn't find Revolution very effective against fleas. I'd stick with
> > Frontline or Advantage.

>Really?  Hmmmm.  I think I will try anyway.  The cats stay indoors and the
> dog will stay on Frontline.  Since the dog is the vehicle for fleas, maybe
> we will be okay.
>
> --
> Lynne

Like I said, our cats have never had fleas (the oldest is now 10) and
they do go out in our back yard and to a vacation home in Wisconsin
where they take walks in the woods. I always figured it was because of
the Revolution but maybe there just aren't a lot of fleas up north.
Anyway, in all that time and with all our travels, there were never any
fleas so I'm happy to stick with Revolution.
-yngver
Annie Wxill - 26 Jan 2007 16:48 GMT
I didn't find Revolution very effective against fleas. I'd stick with
> Frontline or Advantage.
>
> Phil

We live on the Texas Gulf Coast since 1994 and had our cats on Advantage for
fleas and Heartgard for heartworm until about two years ago when we switched
to Revolution.  Our cats are mostly indoors, but allowed into the back yard
when we are there to keep an eye on them.

We did not see a flea or sign of a flea the whole time they were on
Advantage. I like the idea that the flea does not have to bite the cat in
order for the product to work. From our experience,  I would recommend it to
anyone looking for flea control.

We switched to Revolution because it included the heartworm control.  It is
difficult to get our cats to eat the Heartgard and I always worried that
they were not getting the dose they should have.

When we rescued a couple of  roundworm and tapeworm-infested puppies, I was
glad that we already had our cats protected from those additional parasites.
We took the pups to the vet and treated them for the parasites before
turning them over to a rescue organization that placed them in permanent
homes.

Now that we are traveling with our cats, it is convenient and less worrisome
to give them the broad parasite protection with only one monthly
application.   No telling what we might track in from the outside.

Annie
jmc - 07 Feb 2007 22:02 GMT
Suddenly, without warning, Lynne exclaimed (26-Jan-07 10:26 AM):
> The new vet thinks the cats should be on Revolution instead of
> FrontlinePlus and Interceptor.  It would certainly be simpler and less
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> That said, I'm still willing to look into Revolution.  Anyone here use it?  
> What are your experiences with it--good, bad or neutral?

I use Revolution (Stronghold in some countries) on Meep, as she has
Duffy's reaction to Frontline and Frontline Plus - completely freaks,
and it's worse each time.

She has a bit of reaction to Revolution too, but it's much less frantic.
 It certainly has DMSO or something similar - as soon as I start
applying it, she starts licking/smacking her lips a bit, like it tastes
bad (and yes, I put it between her shoulders).

Never had any problem, and when she did pick up something from the
garden one spring - I hadn't applied anything to her over the winter -
it killed 'em off in record time.

It *is* rather expensive, and only available by prescription, but I've
been quite happy with it.

jmc
Lynne - 08 Feb 2007 02:17 GMT
on Wed, 07 Feb 2007 22:14:05 GMT, jmc <NOnewsgroupsSPAM@NOjodiBODY.HOMEus>
wrote:

> It *is* rather expensive, and only available by prescription, but I've
> been quite happy with it.

It can't be anymore pricey than buying both Frontline and Interceptor!  I'm
actually thinking I might save at least a few pennies.  I'm going to switch
them over next month.  Thanks for the input!

Signature

Lynne

cybercat - 08 Feb 2007 20:50 GMT
Check your unmonitored box! Coupon!
Lynne - 08 Feb 2007 22:02 GMT
> Check your unmonitored box! Coupon!

oooooh!  THANK YOU!!  Perfect timing, too.  :)

<3

Signature

Lynne

cybercat - 08 Feb 2007 22:57 GMT
>> Check your unmonitored box! Coupon!
>
> oooooh!  THANK YOU!!  Perfect timing, too.  :)
>
> <3

That is the first 25% off one I have seen from Petsmart, 22% was the biggest
before this. Glad you can use it.
Lynne - 08 Feb 2007 22:59 GMT
on Thu, 08 Feb 2007 22:57:00 GMT, "cybercat" <cyberpurrs@yahoo.com>
wrote:

> That is the first 25% off one I have seen from Petsmart, 22% was the
> biggest before this. Glad you can use it.

Oh yeah!  Levi is almost through his first case of Innova Evo canned and
BONUS! Rudy is starting to eat it, too!!  He loves the dry, but wouldn't
touch the wet.  I found that cutting it into bite sized pieces apparently
makes it more appealing.  My master is probably disappointed it took me so
long to realize that, hehe.

Signature

Lynne

Go Daddy - 08 Feb 2007 22:59 GMT
> Check your unmonitored box! Coupon!

giggle

PLONK
cybercat - 08 Feb 2007 23:04 GMT
>> Check your unmonitored box! Coupon!
>
> giggle
>
> PLONK

You sure youw ant to plonk me?

You might have a package coming.
Nigger - 09 Feb 2007 21:38 GMT
> You sure youw ant to plonk me?
>
> You might have a package coming.

LOLOL

I just don't want you hanging out with scumbags sweety.
One day when you're older, yule understand.

I'm wearing the scarf I was going to send you, it makes me feel
pretty.
parrishable - 09 Feb 2007 21:42 GMT
On Feb 9, 4:38 pm, "catbeaterbarry" <brrypr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I'm wearing the scarf I was going to send you, it makes me feel
> pretty.

Hold on to it, racist.
You'll be looking for a rafter when your audience is gone.

<tick tick tick>
Nigger - 09 Feb 2007 22:00 GMT
> On Feb 9, 4:38 pm, "catbeaterbarry" <brrypr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> <tick tick tick>

I like white people just fine

I bet you got more chins than a Hong Kong phone book. FAT BOY

In the United States, the word nigger was not always considered
derogatory, but was used by some as merely denotative of black, as it
was in other parts of the English-speaking world. In nineteenth-
century literature, there are many uses of the word nigger with no
intended negative connotation. Charles Dickens, and Joseph Conrad (who
published The Nigger of the 'Narcissus' in 1897) used the word without
racist intent. Mark Twain often put the word into the mouths of his
Southern characters, white and black, but did not use the word when
speaking in his own voice in his autobiographical Life on the
Mississippi.

Fatass... would you mind not "going outside anymore" everytime you do,
we lose 4 days of sunlight!

You're a.s is so big, you fell over and rocked yourself to sleep
trying to get back up.

When's the last time you ate out Nick, do they still have to "grease"
you in and out of the booths?
Nigger - 09 Feb 2007 22:08 GMT
> <tick tick tick>

Your a.s is so fat, you got arrested at the airport for having 20 lbs.
of crack

Your got so many rings around your belly you gotta screw your
underwear on.

Your forehead's so fat you could show slides on it.

I bet McDonalds changes their sign everytime you eat there

Your so fat, I don't know why your parents didn't just name you
"Damn!"

Somebody tell you it's chilly outside you grab a spoon bitch!
parrishable - 09 Feb 2007 23:25 GMT
> Your a.s is so fat, you got arrested at the airport for having 20 lbs.
> of crack
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Somebody tell you it's chilly outside you grab a spoon bitch!

Yuk it up, junior -- while you can. (Fat jokes? Now you're getting
desperate.)
Monday's a comin' ; rev up that "but I didn't mean nuthin', honest---
pleeeeze" act for the policy enforcement rep.
Nigger - 10 Feb 2007 00:04 GMT
> Yuk it up, junior -- while you can. (Fat jokes? Now you're getting
> desperate.)
> Monday's a comin' ; rev up that "but I didn't mean nuthin', honest---
> pleeeeze" act for the policy enforcement rep.

LMAO

si puede esperar hasta lunes, im justo no contestando a la puerta vea.
si fuera un crimen verdadero que "rotura violenta" la puerta en... que
es cómo la hacen en ciudad del "nigger". Le despiden, espera
permanentemente que usted consigue su anillo del asno cosido para
arriba, por lo menos a donde usted puede hacer un ruido cuando usted
fart.

Later baldy
Barry - 11 Feb 2007 12:11 GMT
> Yuk it up, junior -- while you can. (Fat jokes? Now you're getting
> desperate.)
> Monday's a comin' ; rev up that "but I didn't mean nuthin', honest---
> pleeeeze" act for the policy enforcement rep.

Roses are red
Violets are blue
If I'm going to jail
So are you
plunk your magic twanger, froggy - 11 Feb 2007 14:59 GMT
> Roses are red
> Violets are blue
> If I'm going to jail
> So are you

(yawn)

Jail? I see no laws being broken. Please post evidence to the
contrary.

However, if you feel strongly about filing false police reports, you
go right ahead. Get yer frustrations out ... more in store ...

You have the name and address, right? (rolls eyes)
;-)
Nigger - 09 Feb 2007 21:41 GMT
> You sure youw ant to plonk me?
>
> You might have a package coming.

oh and SEND THAT PACKAGE!!!

I CAN'T WAIT!

IS IT SOCKS? I NEEEEED MORE SOCKS
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.