> I wonder why vets would even consider doing this. Do any ever flat out
> refuse to do it?
The ONLY reason I would condone declawing would be if it would keep one more
cat in a home. Lets say the owner has a cat who is just destroying the
crap out of their furniture. They have made up their mind that they have no
choice but to either boot it out to be an outdoor cat, or dump it at the
shelter. If declawing the cat would mean that the owner will keep the cat
in their home, then and only then would I be for declawing. We don't need
more cats in shelters, and we don't need more cats roaming outdoors.
IBen Getiner - 23 Jan 2007 03:22 GMT
> The ONLY reason I would condone declawing would be if it would keep one more
> cat in a home. Lets say the owner has a cat who is just destroying the
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> in their home, then and only then would I be for declawing. We don't need
> more cats in shelters, and we don't need more cats roaming outdoors.
It's all left-wing propaganda, Angie... There's absolutely nothing
whatsoever wrong with the procedure. Our boy has never been happier OR
healthier, and he's had all ten removed. He readily plays with his
hanging toy, just as if his claws still existed. He even continues to
use a favorite scratching post. The ONLY thing that has changed is that
he is no longer capable of destroy our stuff. If we couldn't have had
them removed, we never would have taken him in, and he would still be a
little hobo ghost.... living on the fringes of our property line
(that's IF he were still alive). He would never know the paradise that
he enjoys today.
These people who protest against this... They really don't give a
rat'z azz about the cat's health. What we have here is further
encroachment into the sane world by the last vestiges of the 1960's
insane mentality. "Don't tell your children 'No"... "Do as thou will".
"If it feels good, do it". THIS is what they resent... an
Establishment with set rules... Rules that sometime say 'no'. And THEY
don't like it! Just look at their kids, if you have any doubt about
what I'm driving at! They're all total f.cking terrors. Wasted shallow
lives. You tell them to get off the hood of you car and they look at
you like you had earth-worms coming out of your ears. That's because
the word 'no' is almost totally alien to them.
Beware, the animal rights Kooks.... They're all 60's refuse or 60's
wanna-bees. And they want to take away from YOU...
IBen Getiner
Angie - 23 Jan 2007 03:38 GMT
You're a little over the top, you certainly didn't need to lash out at them
as you did. However, I digress. I had one cat who we declawed. Only one
out of many many cats that we had too because we wanted to keep him, and he
ruined all our furniture. Toby was fine. He acted just like a cat with
claws. As you said, he used the scratcher, he even contined to scratch our
furniture. He scratched the carpet and he walked, and jumped and had
perfect balance just like a cat with claws, and that was just a day after
the procedure. I still rather people not declaw, but do it only if you
must.
IBen Getiner - 23 Jan 2007 03:22 GMT
> The ONLY reason I would condone declawing would be if it would keep one more
> cat in a home. Lets say the owner has a cat who is just destroying the
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> in their home, then and only then would I be for declawing. We don't need
> more cats in shelters, and we don't need more cats roaming outdoors.
It's all left-wing propaganda, Angie... There's absolutely nothing
whatsoever wrong with the procedure. Our boy has never been happier OR
healthier, and he's had all ten removed. He readily plays with his
hanging toy, just as if his claws still existed. He even continues to
use a favorite scratching post. The ONLY thing that has changed is that
he is no longer capable of destroy our stuff. If we couldn't have had
them removed, we never would have taken him in, and he would still be a
little hobo ghost.... living on the fringes of our property line
(that's IF he were still alive). He would never know the paradise that
he enjoys today.
These people who protest against this... They really don't give a
rat'z azz about the cat's health. What we have here is further
encroachment into the sane world by the last vestiges of the 1960's
insane mentality. "Don't tell your children 'No"... "Do as thou will".
"If it feels good, do it". THIS is what they resent... an
Establishment with set rules... Rules that sometime say 'no'. And THEY
don't like it! Just look at their kids, if you have any doubt about
what I'm driving at! They're all total f.cking terrors. Wasted shallow
lives. You tell them to get off the hood of you car and they look at
you like you had earth-worms coming out of your ears. That's because
the word 'no' is almost totally alien to them.
Beware, the animal rights Kooks.... They're all 60's refuse or 60's
wanna-bees. And they want to take away from YOU...
IBen Getiner
> A few vets in the US refuse to declaw, but most perform the procedure. In
> my opinion, the reason is *money.*
A close second is emotional blackmail. If the vet doensn't declaw the cat
the client threatens to get rid of the cat- possibly cruelly. I've heard
that
one more than a few times.
Phil