>> Day 4 of antibiotics and Luna seems to be just about sneeze and sniffle
>> free. She has been up running around and much more active. I think it's
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Glad she is better.
You are so right about the "little germ factories". The theory now seems
to be that catching germs as a child builds up their resistance.
> > Day 4 of antibiotics and Luna seems to be just about sneeze and sniffle
> > free. She has been up running around and much more active. I think it's
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Kids are the worst for spreading bacterial/viral infections.
But not to cats. The rhinoviruses that attack humans don't affect
cats. Zoonotic diseases from domestic cats are fairly odd:
Bartonella henselae (sp?) (cat scratch fever)
Toxoplasmosis
Rabies
Ringworm and other dermatophytes (fairly common)
Hookworms (not all species)
Campylobacter infections
Cryptosporidium infections (these are nasty)
Bacterial infections from cat bites (probably the most common)
Heliobacter pylori (causes ulcers) is now thought to be contracted from
cats in some cases.
There are probably more that I can't remember now. Zoonoses are sort
of my "thing", though I study mainly those diseases which affect
non-human primates.
That being said, it's much more likely the teeth.
-L.
Kitkat - 20 Oct 2006 13:07 GMT
>>>Day 4 of antibiotics and Luna seems to be just about sneeze and sniffle
>>>free. She has been up running around and much more active. I think it's
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>
> -L.
The teeth are really the only thing that makes any sense I guess. As
soon as she is cleared by the doctors, she'll be getting that dental!
:)
Thanks everyone.
Pam
cybercat - 20 Oct 2006 16:25 GMT
>> > Day 4 of antibiotics and Luna seems to be just about sneeze and sniffle
>> > free. She has been up running around and much more active. I think it's
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>
> That being said, it's much more likely the teeth.
Thanks for this, Lyn! I had no idea and I bet others didn't either!

Signature
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
22brix - 20 Oct 2006 16:46 GMT
> But not to cats. The rhinoviruses that attack humans don't affect
> cats. Zoonotic diseases from domestic cats are fairly odd:
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> of my "thing", though I study mainly those diseases which affect
> non-human primates.
Cats and dogs can harbour Strep. pyogenes (strep throat) so that even if a
person has been treated they can be reinfected by the pets. I don't know if
it's true for all cases but when a family keeps getting reinfected with
strep it's recommended that the animals be treated also.
> That being said, it's much more likely the teeth.
I agree.
Bonnie
> -L.