Exposing The Homosexual/Pedophile Link
Homosexuals seldom openly admit that they want to sexually assault children,
but their literature and their actions tell another story. In the January
1-8, 2001 issue of The Weekly Standard, author Mary Eberstadt exposed the
clear link between homosexual activism and the growing North-American Man-
Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) movement. Writing in "'Pedophilia Chic'
Reconsidered: The taboo against sex with children continues to erode,"
Eberstadt notes:

 The reason why the public is being urged to reconsider boy pedophilia is
that this 'question,' settled though it may be in the opinions and laws of
the rest of the country, is demonstrably not yet settled within certain
parts of the gay rights movement. The more that movement has entered the
mainstream, the more this 'question' has bubbled forth from that previously
distant realm in the public square.

Eberstadt notes that the book, Male Inter-Generational Intimacy: Historical,
Socio-Psychological, and Legal Perspectives edited by pedophile Edward
Brongersma is currently available in the "gay/lesbian" sections of
bookstores like Borders. This book, which openly promotes pedophilia, was
first published in the Journal of Homosexuality in 1990. The Journal is
edited by John DeCecco, a psychologist at San Francisco State University.
DeCecco is a board member of the Dutch pedophile journal, Paidika.

The homosexual magazine Guide published a pro-pedophile editorial in its
July, 1995 issue. In referring to pedophiles as "prophets" of sexual
freedom, the Guide editorialist wrote: "We must listen to our prophets.
Instead of fearing being labeled pedophiles, we must proudly proclaim that
sex is good, including children's sexuality. . . . Surrounded by pious
moralists with deadening anti-sexual rules, we must be shameless
rulebreakers, demonstrating our allegiance to a higher concept of love. We
must do it for the children's sake."

Parents are correct to be concerned about homosexuals sexually assaulting
their children. The Boy Scouts of America, for example, is right to prohibit
homosexuals from membership or leadership positions. It is evident from the
statistical evidence and news reports of child molestation cases, that
homosexuals pose a clear and present danger to children. Our laws and social
policies should protect children, not cater to the whims and sexual desires
of sexual predators. We must oppose homosexual activism "for the children's
sake."