> I Thought this punishment was rare but the judge who handed out this
> sentence must have been shocked to learn the a.shole pulled the head
> off of a kitten. I was a little shocked. If a person has been in this
> world for the past decade this sort of behavior can seem mild IN
> COMPARISON TO THE sh.t PEOPLE TO DO EACH OTHER
> (I won't mention them, it's a shame to even mention them)
Animal abuse is an indicator of sociopathic behavior and one of three
behaviors manifested by most serial killers - the other two being
pyromania and bed wetting. Animal abusers often go on to abuse and/or
torture humans.
One interesting factiod is that the laws which protect children in the
US were actually modeled after the laws that protected animals in the
1800s. Prior to that, it was legal to beat your child to near death
but not legal to beat your horse at all.
> LIke you say, most perps get a slap, but not all do.. I think it
> depends on the community, the offender and the judge.
In this country by and large is is extremely rare to get prison time
for animal cruelty. Until recently (like the last 7 years or so), in
most states animal cruelty was a class-1 or 2 misdemeanor. The fact
that this guy got prison time is a real victory for animal rights. In
many states animal cruelty is still a misdemeanor - Alaska, Arkansas,
Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Kansas, Maine, Mississippi, Nevada, New
Jersey, Ohio, North Dakota, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah and Wyoming.
In soome other states it is prosecuted as either a misdemeanor or a
felony, depending on the offense.
> In the US do you feel that tougher penalties for offenses against
> animals will ever be realized?
I hope so, though I don't expect prison time for many perps. Recently
a dog was awarded a restraining order against a man who abused him.
That was another huge victory for animal rights.
>Some people ritualistically kill animals
> as a matter of religious practice,
Ritual sacrifice is not abuse. Slitting the throat of a chicken or
goat is not illegal except if that animal is to be used for food (and
ritualized animals are not consumed), it *could be* a violation of the
humane slaughter act. Ritual slaughter for religious purposes is
protected by the constitution, as it should be.
>do you feel this could ever put a
> cap on tougher penalties for crimes against animals.
No, because it's not a crime, if it is done as part of an established
religious ritual, and is done humanely. It is no different than the
home farmer who kills his own chicken for the purpose of eating
although the reason for doing so is different.
> Wouldn't
> imposition upon the secular world become exclusitivity towards some
> religions who do in ignorance sacrifice animals?
I don't beieve it is done in ignorance - it is merely a ritual of a
different belief system (Santeria, for example) than the prevailing one
in this country (Christianity).
Here is a good link regarding Santeria:
http://www.religioustolerance.org/santeri.htm
(Ignore the advertizing)
If someone who claims to be ritualistically sacrificing animals is
proven to be killing the animal in such a way that its death is deemed
inhmane, that person can be prosecuted, just as the home or factory
farmer who kills an animal inhumanely is supposed to be prosecuted for
the crime.
-L.