 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue CatKB.com Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map |
Cat Forum / Health and Behavior / January 2006Man accused of killing cat, hanging its head on a tree
Man accused of killing cat, hanging its head on a tree January 13, 2006, 9:42 AM EST MILAN, N.Y. (AP) _ A Hudson Valley man was accused of shooting his cat, chopping off its head and hanging the severed head from a tree after the animal urinated on a carpet. Robert See, 30, of the rural Dutchess County town of Milan, was charged Wednesday with animal cruelty, killing a cat by gunshot and discharging a firearm within 500 feet of a dwelling, the Daily Freeman of Kingston reported Friday. Authorities told the newspaper See admitted to killing the cat in anger after the animal urinated on a carpet in his home. Doug Niederkorn, a law-enforcement officer with the Dutchess County Society for the Prevention of Cruelty of Animals, said See shot the cat with a high-powered rifle then chopped off the animal's head with an ax, placed the head in a bag and hung the bag from a tree on a neighboring property. "The cat was a large cat, so (See) wanted his skull," Niederkorn said. "He was going to add the skull to his skull collection." All three charges lodged against See are misdemeanors, and he could face up to a year in jail and a $1,000 fine if convicted. http://www.newsday.com/news/local/wire/newyork/ny-bc-ny-brf--catkilled0113jan13, 0,6948172.story?coll=ny-region-apnewyork <snip> If you insist on posting animal abuse articles, would you do some of us a favor out of common courtesy and not descibe the abuse in the header? All you have to do is label it "animal abuse article". Those who want to read that kind of thing will. Thanks. -L. > <snip> > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > want to read that kind of thing will. Thanks. > -L. And if the possibility of being offended is so overwhelming to you, then perhaps Usenet is not an apprpriate venue for you to explore. Either grow a bit of a hide or find a safer environment to be such a silly twat. > And if the possibility of being offended is so overwhelming to you, then > perhaps Usenet is not an apprpriate venue for you to explore. Either grow a > bit of a hide or find a safer environment to be such a silly twat. It's called common courtesy, idiot. It's not offensive to me but maybe somebody just lost their cat tragically, ya know? Not that I'd expect that to cross *your* mind. -L. > > And if the possibility of being offended is so overwhelming to you, then > > perhaps Usenet is not an apprpriate venue for you to explore. Either grow a [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > that to cross *your* mind. > -L. Of course you were offended by it - why else would you invoke a call for 'common courtesy' otherwise? Then in response to me you claim a call for sensitivity on behalf of unspecified others who may have tragically lost a pet. You are a meddlesome twat who enjoys inflicting a contrary opinion just for the sake of making noise. I suppose all of us should quit living and having discussion on any and all subjects just because someone may be going through a period of heightened sensitivity? Bullshit... Following your logic it would be inappropriate to talk of buying a car for my son because someone's child may have recently been killed in their first car. Nobody should talk about how they care for an aging parent since someone elses' may have recently died? It's just a tough old world out there sometimes, isn't it? Tragic stuff happens - outrageous stuff happens... and people will talk about it - graphically. > Of course you were offended by it - why else would you invoke a call for > 'common courtesy' otherwise? Um, because I know some people who read the ng are bothered by such posts. It's a topic that has arisen before, long before you reared your ugly head and will be in affect long after you are gone, as well. >Then in response to me you claim a call for > sensitivity on behalf of unspecified others who may have tragically lost a > pet. It was merely one example. There are plenty of people who appreciate a warning before being exposed to the cruel and gruesome. >You are a meddlesome twat who enjoys inflicting a contrary opinion just > for the sake of making noise. I suppose all of us should quit living and [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Tragic stuff happens - outrageous stuff happens... and people will talk > about it - graphically. Only uncivil people like you, Nancy. (If you aren't her, you're certainly her clone...) -L. > Um, because I know some people who read the ng are bothered by such > posts. It's a topic that has arisen before, long before you reared > your ugly head and will be in affect long after you are gone, as well. I've seen the topic here and in other groups before. You now admit to whining on behalf of the unspecified others - underscoring my contention that you are indeed a noisy, meddlesome twat. > It was merely one example. There are plenty of people who appreciate a > warning before being exposed to the cruel and gruesome. This is Usenet - not the weekly church bulletin. If the content of a *header* much less an entire post bothers you to this extreme, perhaps confining yourself to moderated groups is in order. > > Tragic stuff happens - outrageous stuff happens... and people will talk > > about it - graphically. > > Only uncivil people like you, Nancy. > (If you aren't her, you're certainly her clone...) Attempting to impose your will on others in an open worldwide forum is classic pissing in the wind. Life goes on, pure and raw despite the trifling efforts of the likes of you. > This is Usenet - not the weekly church bulletin. <snip masturbatory babble> Don't you have a kiddie class you should be attending, Mr. Bowlingreen? -L. > > This is Usenet - not the weekly church bulletin. > > <snip masturbatory babble> > > Don't you have a kiddie class you should be attending, Mr. Bowlingreen? > -L. Watch out, Rob, she *will* go real life on you. It's what she does when she just can't stand it anymore. 8') > > > This is Usenet - not the weekly church bulletin. > > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > 8') More libel from our friend Nancy who calls the cops over Usenet flame wars. Pretty ironic coming from you, Nance. Oh, I forgot. You aren't Nancy. <snicker> -L. > Watch out, Rob, she *will* go real life on you. It's what she does > when she just can't stand it anymore. Excuse me - just what would someone who pleads revulsion over a newsgroup header know about real life? Not that I would expect a coherent answer but...... I tremble... not. Sick bastard SEE, ROBERT845-758-2745 82 Indian Rd Red Hook, NY 12571 > Man accused of killing cat, hanging its head on a tree > [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > > http://www.newsday.com/news/local/wire/newyork/ny-bc-ny-brf--catkilled0113jan13, 0,6948172.story?coll=ny-region-apnewyork He's a sh.t worm! Disgusting. =õ( perhaps he should add his own skull to his collection. I think that this guy should not have any kinds of pets to begin with.
|
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.