Cat Forum / Health and Behavior / November 2005
Not sure what to do
|
|
Thread rating:  |
blkcatgal - 20 Nov 2005 15:54 GMT You may recall that I posted a message regarding my 16 year old cat that began limping. He's still limping and I've scheduled an appt. for tomorrow to have xrays taken (which is the only day this week the vet can do it because of Thanksgiving this week). This makes me nervous enough because the vet will have to sedate him and the last time my cat was sedated, it took him 2 days to fully recover. Now the problem is that over the last couple of days, my cat has thrown up 3 times and I'm not sure why. The first time I thought it might be hairballs because there was a little fur mixed in. But last night he threw up almost everything he ate that day. And he really didn't feel like eating all day. I gave him pepcid ac and some baby food last night. This morning he wanted to eat and ate pretty well. No vomiting yet.
I'm wondering if I should go ahead and have the xray taken tomorrow. Or because of the vomiting episodes, should I wait (which means I would have to wait until next week to do it). I thought I'd wait to see how he was today and if he didn't vomit, go ahead with the appt. tomorrow.
Thanks. Sue
zuzu22@webtv.net - 20 Nov 2005 16:12 GMT >This makes me nervous enough because >the vet will have to sedate him ???? In all the years I've had cats in my life I have NEVER had to have a cat sedated for an xray. We're talking about a leg right? If your vet is unable to do a simple xray of a leg on an awake cat, that is beyond ridiculous. Even if they did, giving the cat a little gas anesthesia is all that is needed and they recover from that very quickly. Find another vet.
Megan
 Signature
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."
-Edmund Burke
Learn The TRUTH About Declawing http://www.stopdeclaw.com
Zuzu's Cats Photo Album: http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22
"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision, raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his way."
- W.H. Murray
Lumpy - 20 Nov 2005 16:28 GMT > >This makes me nervous enough because > >the vet will have to sedate him [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > all that is needed and they recover from that very quickly. Find another > vet. I agree. Hell, his leg could just be HELD still for the xray. Don't do it. Get another vet.
Spot - 20 Nov 2005 16:33 GMT I agree with Megan that you need to find another vet.
You already know he doesn't do well with gas and with his age I would never have him put under unless it was something life threatening it's just to risky with his past.
Celeste
> >This makes me nervous enough because >>the vet will have to sedate him [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > > - W.H. Murray No More Retail - 20 Nov 2005 16:46 GMT Megan <zuzu22@webtv.net> , Lumpy and Spot hit it right on the nose something is definitely wrong
DON'T let him sedate him Don't go back to this vet if he is going to force the issue Find another vet or take him to an animal hospital around here in Florida they have their own x-ray machine. Animal hospital are open on Sunday's may cost a little more
The only reason to sedate an animal for a x-ray is if the animal is uncontrollable if this is true and the x-ray needs to be done and you can handle the firball you may have to wear a lead apron and help out
If you do have to sedate him there is a shot that helps them recover quicker I forgot the name of it it cost about $16. But putting an animal under over the age of 12 has its' dangers
If you are worried about dehydration since he has been vomiting you can give him some Gatorade
MaryL - 20 Nov 2005 16:41 GMT > >This makes me nervous enough because >>the vet will have to sedate him [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Megan I agree. My cats have never been sedated for an X-Ray. If the cat is so agitated that sedation is required then gas anesthesia is the way to go. We recently had to use gas anesthesia for Holly so the vet could probe more carefully into what looked like a minor cut on her paw (I think I described it to you -- turned out to be more serious than expected and had an abscess, which was successfully treated). She was alert and showed absolutely no after-effects just a few minutes later.
MaryL
Karen - 20 Nov 2005 21:32 GMT >>> This makes me nervous enough because >>> the vet will have to sedate him [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > MaryL I even have a very testy cat that did not need to be sedated for xrays. I agree with going to a different vet.
Phil P. - 20 Nov 2005 23:03 GMT > >This makes me nervous enough because > >the vet will have to sedate him
> Even if they did, giving the cat a little gas anesthesia is > all that is needed and they recover from that very quickly. You don't know what you're talking about. Isoflurane smells *very bad* and used alone the smell is *very* stressful for a cat- much too stressful for an older cat that might have undiagnosed heart disease and could cause the cat to decompensate.
zuzu22@webtv.net - 20 Nov 2005 23:59 GMT Phil wrote:
>You don't know what you're talking >about. Isoflurane smells *very bad* and >used alone the smell is *very* stressful for >a cat- Not necessarily. I've done this with ferals many, many times over the years (with several different vets) and have been present for every procedure, including with my 10 year old feral Stella just a few months ago as she has to be put under just to be examined. The cats were boxed down and in every instance the cats, once in the confines of the box, were quiet, calm and fell asleep quickly. I'll choose the cat dealing with something that doesn't smell great for the very short time it takes for them to fall asleep over a sedative that may have an adverse effect for days, which is exactly what happened to the OP's cat.
Megan
 Signature
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."
-Edmund Burke
Learn The TRUTH About Declawing http://www.stopdeclaw.com
Zuzu's Cats Photo Album: http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22
"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision, raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his way."
- W.H. Murray
Phil P. - 21 Nov 2005 01:27 GMT > Phil wrote: > >You don't know what you're talking [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > down and in every instance the cats, once in the confines of the box, > were quiet, calm and fell asleep quickly. Bullshit. I don't believe you ever saw a cat anesthetized in an induction chamber- and especially without a sedative or pre-induction agent. Alert cats freak out in an induction chamber with Iso without sedation. You can't bullshit me.
I'll choose the cat dealing
> with something that doesn't smell great for the very short time it takes > for them to fall asleep over a sedative that may have an adverse effect > for days, which is exactly what happened to the OP's cat. Its clearly obvious that you don't know what you're talking about. I see you've never heard of ultra-short acting sedatives and induction agents for brief procedures such as x-rays and CTs or dental exams-- or does your vet normally do dental exams without sedation, too? Cats fully recover from short-acting sedatives in less than 10 minutes.
Let me refresh you're memory with a discussion that took place in this newsgroup about this very issue a few years ago with Doctor J Martin - I'm sure you remember him:
From: J. Martin (jmartin@fake.address) Subject: Anesthesia in cats
View this article only Newsgroups: rec.pets.cats.health+behav Date: 2001-09-09 07:09:01 PST
"I have read countless times in this newsgroup that the ideal anesthesia in cats is isoflurane only. When the topic of anesthesia is brought up people are encouraged to request their cats be anesthetized with nothing but isoflurane. This has bugged me for a long time so I've decided to comment on it.
Isoflurane only anesthesia involves placing a completely alert cat in a gas box and running isoflurane gas at maximum concentration for about 5 minutes until the cat is unconscious, then the cat is intubated and surgery begins. Isoflurane smells very bad and this procedure is extremely stressful for the cat. Its not uncommon for the terrified cats to flail around inside the small box trying to escape the noxious fumes. Not only is this disturbing to witness, it places the cat at risk of self inflicted trauma. It is this kind of prolonged intense stress that can cause a cat with asymptomatic heart disease to decompensate and go into heart failure. Isoflurane is a very safe anesthetic at regular concentrations but the high concentrations used for tank inductions can cause profound, life threatening hypotension (low blood pressure). Being in a sealed box the cat cannot be monitored closely enough during this critical period."
Save your bullshit stories for people that don't know any better, huh.
zuzu22@webtv.net - 21 Nov 2005 01:57 GMT Phil wrote:
>Bullshit. I don't believe you ever saw a >cat anesthetized in an induction chamber- >and especially without a sedative or >pre-induction agent. Alert cats freak out in >an induction chamber with Iso without >sedation. You can't bullshit me. I'm not and speak the truth. Since I am the one at the vet office with the most experience handling ferals and because of liability, I take the responsibility for getting the cat into the chamber. As I stated before, I have done it many times over the years and have been present for the entire exam. I have NEVER had a cat freak out in the chamber and things have always and without exception gone very smoothly. You can cry and whine bullshit all you want, Phil, but you weren't there at any of these events. I was, as was the vet and techs. If you want to claim I'm lying it doesn't make it so, and only makes it clear that you have no clue.
Megan.
 Signature
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."
-Edmund Burke
Learn The TRUTH About Declawing http://www.stopdeclaw.com
Zuzu's Cats Photo Album: http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22
"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision, raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his way."
- W.H. Murray
Phil P. - 21 Nov 2005 02:37 GMT > Phil wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > >an induction chamber with Iso without > >sedation. You can't bullshit me. I have NEVER had a cat freak out in the chamber and things
> have always and without exception gone very smoothly. You can say anything you please. I didn't have to be there to know that's not true. I *know* how cats react to Iso in an induction chamber if they're not sedated- I've seen it enough times. That's why we don't do it- even though it would be easier for us. Even a masking down an alert cat with Iso is very stressful for them because the smell is so bad. You clearly don't know what you're talking about.
PawsForThought - 21 Nov 2005 02:41 GMT I *know* how cats react to Iso in an induction chamber if they're
> not sedated- I've seen it enough times. That's why we don't do it- even > though it would be easier for us. Even a masking down an alert cat with Iso > is very stressful for them because the smell is so bad. You clearly don't > know what you're talking about. Phil, what do you use for sedation before the Iso?
Phil P. - 21 Nov 2005 02:46 GMT > I *know* how cats react to Iso in an induction chamber if they're > > not sedated- I've seen it enough times. That's why we don't do it- even [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Phil, what do you use for sedation before the Iso? Propofol or thiopental- depends on which vet is administering the anesthetic.
PawsForThought - 21 Nov 2005 02:56 GMT > "PawsForThought" <Mickey4Paws@anonymous.to> wrote in message > > Phil, what do you use for sedation before the Iso? > > Propofol or thiopental- depends on which vet is administering the > anesthetic. Thanks, Phil, I saw further down in the thread where you talked about it. I'm making a note of it for the next time one of my cats needs Iso so I can ask my vet about it. I do remember when Dr. Martin posted last year about the induction box and how stressful it is to cats. Having an asthmatic cat, I really don't want to cause her any more stress than absolutely necessary.
Lauren
Phil P. - 21 Nov 2005 03:21 GMT > > "PawsForThought" <Mickey4Paws@anonymous.to> wrote in message > > > Phil, what do you use for sedation before the Iso? [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > it. I'm making a note of it for the next time one of my cats needs Iso > so I can ask my vet about it. Actually, the safest anesthetic is the one your vet is the most familiar with. I wouldn't want a vet to learn a new anesthetic on my cats! I'd rather use a vet that uses an anesthetic protocol that I'm comfortable with than tell a vet what to use.
I do remember when Dr. Martin posted
> last year about the induction box and how stressful it is to cats. He was absolutely right. After I saw a few cats bounce off the walls of the induction chamber, I never allowed it again without premedication.
> Having an asthmatic cat, I really don't want to cause her any more > stress than absolutely necessary. Have you tried inhaled Flovent (steroid)? Much less systemic effects.
Phil
PawsForThought - 23 Nov 2005 00:26 GMT > "PawsForThought" <Mickey4Paws@anonymous.to> wrote in message
> Actually, the safest anesthetic is the one your vet is the most familiar > with. I wouldn't want a vet to learn a new anesthetic on my cats! I'd > rather use a vet that uses an anesthetic protocol that I'm comfortable with > than tell a vet what to use. Good point. Meesha is going for her 6 month checkup Saturday. I'm going to see if my vet uses the Propofol just for curiosity and for future reference.
> > Having an asthmatic cat, I really don't want to cause her any more > > stress than absolutely necessary. > > Have you tried inhaled Flovent (steroid)? Much less systemic effects. We've never used inhaled meds. Meesha is doing so well on the natural cortisone that I'm afraid to tip the boat at this stage. She'll have some tests including a full blood panel Saturday so we'll see how her numbers are. However, if a time comes when it's not working well, I would definitely try the Flovent.
zuzu22@webtv.net - 21 Nov 2005 03:07 GMT Phil wrote: <snip bullshit argument> I know exactly what I am talking about and stand by what I said. Your lie doesn't change the facts.
Megan
 Signature
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."
-Edmund Burke
Learn The TRUTH About Declawing http://www.stopdeclaw.com
Zuzu's Cats Photo Album: http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22
"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision, raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his way."
- W.H. Murray
Phil P. - 21 Nov 2005 03:26 GMT > Phil wrote: > <snip bullshit argument> > I know exactly what I am talking about and stand by what I said. Your > lie doesn't change the facts. Yeah, Doc J was lying too, eh?
The cats were probably premedicated and you didn't even know. *If* your story is true, that's the *only* explanation for the ease of induction.
zuzu22@webtv.net - 21 Nov 2005 04:34 GMT Phil wrote:
>Yeah, Doc J was lying too, eh? He said it was not uncommon. You do realize that "not uncommon" means that it doesn't happen every time, and he didn't say it did.
>The cats were probably premedicated >and you didn't even know. *If* your story >is true, that's the *only* explanation for >the ease of induction. It is not the only explanation, and these cats were never premedicated. I took them directly from the carrier and put them into the box. There were no injections of any kind administered at any time beforehand and I would know as I was present the entire time specifically because these cats are feral and I am the one that knows best how to handle them.
It's hard enough getting a feral that hates being touched out of a carrier and into the chamber without trying to give it a shot as well. That may account for why they don't freak out once in the chamber. It could be they are just relieved to not have someone touching them and feel safe in the small space, especially after being put in a carrier at home, enduring a car ride, and then being removed from the carrier that they now don't want to come out of. All that is a lot more stressful than the minute it takes in a chamber before they go to sleep. Regardless, I have never had a cat freak out in the chamber and things have always gone smoothly.
Megan
 Signature
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."
-Edmund Burke
Learn The TRUTH About Declawing http://www.stopdeclaw.com
Zuzu's Cats Photo Album: http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22
"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision, raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his way."
- W.H. Murray
Phil P. - 21 Nov 2005 05:23 GMT > Phil wrote: > >Yeah, Doc J was lying too, eh? > > He said it was not uncommon. You do realize that "not uncommon" means > that it doesn't happen every time, and he didn't say it did. Yeah, yeah, yeah, and you said "never"- meaning it "never" happened. Even "sometimes" would have been a little more believable.
Its really funny how you stick to your bullshit story in the face of incontrovertible fact to the contrary. The fact is, straight Iso in an induction chamber without premedication is *very* stressful for a cat. I've *seen* alert cats' reaction to Iso in a box, so I *know* you're lying.
Care to revise your bullshit story?
zuzu22@webtv.net - 21 Nov 2005 05:53 GMT >Yeah, yeah, yeah, and you said "never"- >meaning it "never" happened. Even >"sometimes" would have been a little >more believable. I would be lying if I said it happened "sometimes." For the zillionth time I will reiterate that I have NEVER had a cat freak out in the chamber.
>Its really funny how you stick to your >bullshit story in the face of incontrovertible >fact to the contrary. Since you weren't present at any of the events, you have *no* facts. None. Zero. Zip. Nada.
>The fact is, straight Iso in an induction >chamber without premedication is *very* >stressful for a cat. I've *seen* alert cats' >reaction to Iso in a box, so I *know* you're >lying. You know nothing of the kind and your twisted logic and assertions are laughable considering the *fact* that you weren't there.
>Care to revise your bullshit story? That's a question you should be asking yourself.
Megan
 Signature
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."
-Edmund Burke
Learn The TRUTH About Declawing http://www.stopdeclaw.com
Zuzu's Cats Photo Album: http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22
"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision, raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his way."
- W.H. Murray
Phil P. - 21 Nov 2005 07:38 GMT > >Yeah, yeah, yeah, and you said "never"- > >meaning it "never" happened. Even [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > time I will reiterate that I have NEVER had a cat freak out in the > chamber. You can reiterate all you want. Repeating the same thing over and over doesn't make it true or believable. My first-hand experience and the experience of several vets tell me otherwise. I tend to believe what I've seen rather than what you say. So reiterate all you want- it means nothing. The zillionth is no more believable than the first.
Btw, how does your vet monitor the cat during induction- which is the most critical phase of anesthesia- while inside a sealed box, huh? Lets see you conjure up a good answer for that one.
zuzu22@webtv.net - 21 Nov 2005 15:24 GMT Phil wrote:
>You can reiterate all you want. >Repeating the same thing over and over [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >means nothing. The zillionth is no more >believable than the first. The truth is the truth. Just because you, a known liar with a long history of inventing fabrications, manipulating facts and lying about your own actions (you were just busted in another thread for doing exactly that, leaving traps set unattended while you're at home posting to Usenet), claims it is not doesn't make it so.
This is just another example of your desperate need to be right, even if the facts and reality say otherwise. In fact, I see Lyn has now posted and has had the same experience as I have, with the cat handling the chamber just fine. If, as you "claim", every cat you've ever seen has reacted badly and freaked out then it's more likely that you're doing something wrong or handling the cat improperly.
>Btw, how does your vet monitor the cat >during induction- which is the most critical >phase of anesthesia- while inside a sealed >box, huh? Induction chambers are clear. You put the cat in, turn the gas on, watch the cat until it nods off and then take it out of the box and put a mask on. If there is an issue while the cat is in the box you simply turn the gas off and take the cat out, and the cat wakes up very quickly. You yourself have said on numerous occasions how safe gas is. For example: "If the cat has a "bad reaction" all the vet has to do is just.....turn it off! Iso's effects are quickly and easily reversed."
Megan
 Signature
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."
-Edmund Burke
Learn The TRUTH About Declawing http://www.stopdeclaw.com
Zuzu's Cats Photo Album: http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22
"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision, raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his way."
- W.H. Murray
treeline12345@yahoo.com - 21 Nov 2005 17:26 GMT > Phil wrote: > >You can reiterate all you want. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > >means nothing. The zillionth is no more > >believable than the first.
> This is just another example of your desperate need to be right, even if > the facts and reality say otherwise. In fact, I see Lyn has now posted [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > Megan A good debate will bring up strong opinions. I learned a lot from this debate. I think the edginess and fractiousness I see here is precisely because we are dealing with lots of information. Some of this information is quite critical of either vets or even ourselves at times. If I had to contend with lots of cats as Phil does, I probably would be short-fused at times. Most of what he says is on the money, not all, but most. Most of what we are discussing here can be a matter of life and death and is one of the main problems in all of medicine. Anesthesia is what makes minor things major operations. It's tricky and an edgy topic because mistakes will destroy someone's brain.
Anesthesia is a terrible, deadly thing when misused. It's probably, and here I am guessing, one of the main reasons that senior adults, humans, are made into vegetable cases in hospitals. Now there are more safeguards. But many, many people were reduced to the living dead because either given too much anesthesia or the anesthesiologist was either working two operating rooms or not monitoring the equipment to prevent brain dead death.
I cannot think of many things worse than going into a hospital for a routine case, like gallbladder surgery and coming out a basket case. With laser surgery, this is now reduced I would reckon.
Quite a few years ago Harvard did a study on this. Most of the gallbladder operations were not necessary and accounted for way too many brain deaths in the elderly. And what is true for senior citizens is also true for senior felines, although they do not have citizen status - yet:)
Let's keep up the controversy because when we have only a few posts and limited time, it helps be critical, even at the risk of appearng unnecessarily adversarial.
Again, I found this thread extremely helpful and informative. I now know a lot about anesthetics. And I am pleasantly surprised that the drug of choice that Phil prefers is the same drug that was given to me personally a scant two weeks ago, although by an anesthesiologist whose sole responsibility was to make sure I was given the right amount and came out alive. I came out crystal clear and without any effects whatsoever that I could notice with the Diprivan which is also propofol or profofol. Why so many names, I don't know unless they are brand names. I don't have the time to look it up at the moment.
I also learned about drugs given before Isoflurane and what exactly Isoflurane smells and does. A box is not necessarily the easiest thing but if clear, then okay. And my suspicions about ketamine were confirmed. Maybe I would go to a major animal hospital so more likely they would be using the advanced techniques, as opposed to a local vet who may not have the time or interest to get the latest equipment, drugs, and most of all, expertise.
Good for me. Good for cats. A win-win situation.
Phil P. - 21 Nov 2005 19:56 GMT > whatsoever that I could notice with the Diprivan which is also propofol > or profofol. Why so many names, I don't know unless they are brand > names. I don't have the time to look it up at the moment. I think the generic name is Propofol and the tradename is Diprivan.
> I also learned about drugs given before Isoflurane and what exactly > Isoflurane smells and does. I actually got a whiff of the stuff- nasty! You've got a have a good scavenging system when you use Iso. Even though the effects are very short, it can knock you for a loop if it you get enough of it. Iso comes in little glass bottles- if you drop one- you're in big trouble!
A box is not necessarily the easiest thing
> but if clear, then okay. Aside from the cats' reaction to the noxious fumes, you can't monitor the cat's blood pressure or O2 or CO2 from inside a sealed chamber. Induction is the most dangerous stage of anesthesia and when monitoring is most important.
And my suspicions about ketamine were
> confirmed. Its the cheapest crap on the market- that's why so many vets use it. .
Maybe I would go to a major animal hospital so more likely
> they would be using the advanced techniques, as opposed to a local vet > who may not have the time or interest to get the latest equipment, > drugs, and most of all, expertise. Many vets charge extra for gas because it requires a lot of expensive equipment- especially the precision vaporizer- and Iso requires a special vaporizer that's calibrated for Iso.
Phil
Phil P. - 21 Nov 2005 17:57 GMT Phil wrote:
>were just busted in another thread for doing exactly that, leaving traps set unattended while you're at home posting to Usenet),
I don't think so. The only thing that has been busted is your balloon. I've had an air card for my laptops for years--I have internet access from *anywhere*. Before I had the air card, I used my cell phone as modem. I guess that's very hard for you to fathom with your Web-TV.
>This is just another example of your desperate need to be right, Naa, it just usually works out that way because I usually know what I'm talking about..
>Btw, how does your vet monitor the cat >during induction- which is the most critical >phase of anesthesia- while inside a sealed >box, huh?
>Induction chambers are clear. You put the cat in, turn the gas on, watch the cat until it nods
OMG! When the cat nods out- she could be dead! You can't monitor the cat's blood pressure or heart rate from inside an induction chamber. The Iso concentration needed to anesthetize a cat can cause *fatal* hypotension! What the hell kind of vet do you have??? One of the reasons for premedicating a cat is so *LESS* anesthetic agent is necessary. Now, I have absolutely *no* doubt *whatsoever* that you don't know what the hell you're talking about. Thanks for clearing that up.
cybercat - 21 Nov 2005 18:09 GMT > Phil wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > *anywhere*. Before I had the air card, I used my cell phone as modem. > I guess that's very hard for you to fathom with your Web-TV. What really kills me is when Megan complains about "too many posts" because her WebTV can't handle it. Oh, the brass balls of the insane. lol
Phil P. - 21 Nov 2005 19:53 GMT > > Phil wrote: > > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > because her WebTV can't handle it. Oh, the brass balls of the insane. > lol She used to be a lot worse (if you can imagine that).
The speed is faster with the air card than with dial up- at least it seems that way. But its a lot slower than DSL. Using my cell phone as a modem connected to a laptop was a nightmare- really slow and I had no access in some areas. At the beginning it didn't bother me because I have unlimited nights and weekends- but after awhile the slow speed drove me nuts so I sprung for the air card. What I save in overseas calls to the other side of the world more than offsets the cost of the card and service. The first month alone paid for the card.
-L. - 23 Nov 2005 01:15 GMT <snip lies baout internet access>
Phil, keep repeating it as much as you want. Nobody but cybercunt believes you.
> OMG! When the cat nods out- she could be dead! You can't monitor the cat's > blood pressure or heart rate from inside an induction chamber. The Iso > concentration needed to anesthetize a cat can cause *fatal* hypotension! > What the hell kind of vet do you have??? None of the feline specialists I worked for in the SF Bay area monitored BP, heart rate, O2 or anything else while knocking cats out in iso chambers. You basically feed in a mix and wait until the cat goes down. The idea is to get them down, and then mask them asap. I think they know a *little* more about feline medicine than you do. Or do you know some magic way to monitor a cat in an iso chamber?
One of the reasons for
> premedicating a cat is so *LESS* anesthetic agent is necessary. The main reason is so that the cat can be handled *to* give it anesthetic.
> Now, I have > absolutely *no* doubt *whatsoever* that you don't know what the hell you're > talking about. Thanks for clearing that up. There you go again. Did it ever occur to you that other people in other parts of the world have different experiences than yourself? Didn't think so. Phil P. : Be-all and know-it-all of the Universe.
-L.
Phil P. - 23 Nov 2005 01:42 GMT > <snip lies baout internet access> > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > monitored BP, heart rate, O2 or anything else while knocking cats out > in iso chambers. If that's true-- which I doubt, slim- you've worked for mediocre-to-poor vets. That's probably why you don't know any better. A good vet know's how to anesthetize, neuter, and place a feral in a recovery cage without *ever* touching her while she's conscious or using an induction chamber.
> There you go again. Did it ever occur to you that other people in > other parts of the world have different experiences than yourself?
> Didn't think so. Phil P. : Be-all and know-it-all of the Universe. Naa, it only seems that way to you, slim, because I know more than you.
-L. - 23 Nov 2005 01:47 GMT > If that's true-- which I doubt, slim- you've worked for mediocre-to-poor > vets. That's probably why you don't know any better. A good vet know's how > to anesthetize, neuter, and place a feral in a recovery cage without *ever* > touching her while she's conscious or using an induction chamber. I didn't say anything about ferals. Ferals were presedated, always.
> > There you go again. Did it ever occur to you that other people in > > other parts of the world have different experiences than yourself? > > > Didn't think so. Phil P. : Be-all and know-it-all of the Universe. > > Naa, it only seems that way to you, slim, because I know more than you. As you keep having to tell us again and again. That microdick looking any bigger today?
-L.
Phil P. - 23 Nov 2005 03:09 GMT > > If that's true-- which I doubt, slim- you've worked for mediocre-to-poor > > vets. That's probably why you don't know any better. A good vet know's how > > to anesthetize, neuter, and place a feral in a recovery cage without *ever* > > touching her while she's conscious or using an induction chamber. > > I didn't say anything about ferals. Ferals were presedated, always. There're ya ago! That's was exactly my point!
> > > There you go again. Did it ever occur to you that other people in > > > other parts of the world have different experiences than yourself? [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > As you keep having to tell us again and again. I just like to rub it in because I know it bothers you. Otherwise you wouldn't keep mentioning it.
-L. - 23 Nov 2005 07:03 GMT > > I didn't say anything about ferals. Ferals were presedated, always. > > There're ya ago! That's was exactly my point! That doesn't mean there aren't cases where cats, feral or otherwise, cannot be presedated and need to be taken down in an iso chamber. Megan and/or her vet may very well have a reason for having ferals anesthesized this way.
The vet office I was referring to took ferals reluctantly, and only would take them in transfer cages, under the condition that whomever dropped them off knew they would be presedated, regardless of the outcome. What this meant is that even ferals with a history contraindicating presedation were presedated - not very good medical policy, IMO.
FWIW, the a.shole owner of the practice also declawed on demand, which is one of the major reasons I finally quit working there. They did a lot of good in the community - low and no-cost S/N, for example, but in the end, I just couldn't stomach the mentality of the owner.
> > > > There you go again. Did it ever occur to you that other people in > > > > other parts of the world have different experiences than yourself? [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > I just like to rub it in because I know it bothers you. Otherwise you > wouldn't keep mentioning it. Again, it doesn't. I have stated time and time again that you know more about cats than I do. For some reason that makes you proud, as if you win some award or something. What's up with that?
-L.
Phil P. - 23 Nov 2005 09:09 GMT > > > I didn't say anything about ferals. Ferals were presedated, always. > > > > There're ya ago! That's was exactly my point! > > That doesn't mean there aren't cases where cats, feral I don't care about other cases. That's way ferals should be handled. My point was: There's no need to put a cat through the stress and *danger* of a tank induction while she's fully conscious and alert. There's no need to handle or even touch a feral while she's conscious from the time she's trapped until she's released. Less stress for the cat, less risk of injury for the cat, handler and the vet.
I don't know how some people do things, but you shouldn't have to touch a feral *at all* while she's conscious- if you know what you're doing and have the right equipment. You simply butt the back of the trap to the squeeze cage or restraint module and raise the doors. Most cats go right into the squeeze cage to get out of the trap. If she doesn't, gently nudge her into the trap with a cage divider or tilt the trap and cage. Then gently squeeze the cat against the side of the cage with the lever that moves the wall. The cat will be immobilized against the side of the cage and can be sedated without any difficulty and transferred to the table for surgery. What's so hard about that?
After surgery and the gas is shut off but while she's still groggy, you transfer her to a carrier or cage for recovery and from where she's later released. You can feed her and change the litter by confining her to the back of the cage with a cage divider that slides between the bars.-- costs about $12.
We go through the procedure like clock-work every time. Its safe and minimally stressful for the cat, and fast and safe for all personnel. It has to be fast because you can't exactly make an appointment to trap and neuter a feral.
I'm often amazed by the difficulty some people have with ferals. They make a major production of it. They stress out the cats as well as themselves. Many people think they're experts because they've been doing it for so long- even though they've been doing things a.s-backwards. All you need is transfer trap that has a vertical rear door, a squeeze cage or restraint module, a good size transfer cage and a cage divider. You're in business for <$250 and the equipment will last many years. If your time is so valuable- that set up is the best investment you can make because it will save you a *lot* of time and trouble- its also the safest system you can put together because you never have to touch a conscious feral. You only need one recovery cage because it never has to leave the building - you can also transfer the cat from the cage to a carrier for release without ever touching her. Males can go right back out in a few hours.
>FWIW, the a.shole owner of the practice also declawed on demand, which >is one of the major reasons I finally quit working there. Now tell me you never saw or heard cats waking up screaming in excruciating pain bouncing off the walls of the cage in pools of blood from ripping off the bandages trying to get at their paws?
They did a
>lot of good in the community - low and no-cost S/N, for example, but in >the end, I just couldn't stomach the mentality of the owner. Most of the low-cost neuter clinics I know have their hearts in the right place. But some equate low-cost with low-quality of care.
> > I just like to rub it in because I know it bothers you. Otherwise you > > wouldn't keep mentioning it. > > Again, it doesn't. I have stated time and time again that you know > more about cats than I do. For some reason that makes you proud, as if > you win some award or something. What's up with that? It sure seems like it bothers you. If it didn't, you wouldn't repeatedly make remarks like "Phil P. : Be-all and know-it-all of the Universe."
Btw, here's a holiday present for you: http://www.maxshouse.com/misc/mobileoffice.jpg
cybercat - 21 Nov 2005 17:30 GMT > > >Yeah, yeah, yeah, and you said "never"- > > >meaning it "never" happened. Even [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > You can reiterate all you want. Repeating the same thing over and over > doesn't make it true or believable. This won't stop Megan or Lyn. At least it is funny to watch. There is something to say about entertainment value.
Aren't you glad you don't base most of your sense of self worth on whether or not you are seen as an "expert" in Usenet?
-L. - 21 Nov 2005 05:38 GMT > It is not the only explanation, and these cats were never premedicated. > I took them directly from the carrier and put them into the box. There [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > Regardless, I have never had a cat freak out in the chamber and things > have always gone smoothly. This is the procedure we used for my Peewee because he seizures on Ace and at the time, our only other option was valium and valium was useless for him. He never "freaked out" but would paw the air a couple of times before he conked out. I have never seen a cat flail in an iso chamber - there isn't much room to move, and I think the worst reaction I have seen is meowing/pawing. Some cats handle it better than others, whether or not they received a presed.
Worst reaction I have ever seen anywhere was an ace/ket/atropine cat that literally bounced off the walls. Why the hell anyone uses ketamine anymore is beyond me. That stuff is just freakin nasty.
-L.
PawsForThought - 21 Nov 2005 13:43 GMT > Worst reaction I have ever seen anywhere was an ace/ket/atropine cat > that literally bounced off the walls. Why the hell anyone uses > ketamine anymore is beyond me. That stuff is just freakin nasty. I had a cat that was a total basket case after receiving a drug similar to Ketamine and for the life of me, I can't remember what it was called. I think it started with a "T*. I know I'd remember if I heard it though. Anyway, she hiss and growled for a couple of days, and you could tell she was really hallucinating. I had my doubts she'd ever come out of it, but fortunately she did.
treeline12345@yahoo.com - 20 Nov 2005 18:59 GMT > You may recall that I posted a message regarding my 16 year old cat that > began limping. He's still limping and I've scheduled an appt. for tomorrow > to have xrays taken (which is the only day this week the vet can do it > because of Thanksgiving this week). This makes me nervous enough because > the vet will have to sedate him and the last time my cat was sedated, it > took him 2 days to fully recover. Now the problem is that over the last That's a bad sign. Did the vet use the expensive stuff or the cheap stuff?
I can't remember but there's a gas that is some dollars more but much safer than other methods of sedation.
Does your cat really need sedation or is the vet just adding on extras to the bill?
Two days to recover means your vet used the wrong amount of anesthetic. This is a warning sign in addition to the sedation in the first place. Does he have assistants to help him who are competent?
blkcatgal - 20 Nov 2005 19:08 GMT It's not anesthesia. It's only sedation...a shot, not gas. I'm sure my vet doesn't use the cheap stuff. It's not to pad the bill. I've read that in order to get an accurate xray, the animal has to be as still as possible. Sometimes just holding the animal down is not enough to keep the animal completely still.
>> You may recall that I posted a message regarding my 16 year old cat that >> began limping. He's still limping and I've scheduled an appt. for [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > This is a warning sign in addition to the sedation in the first place. > Does he have assistants to help him who are competent? Lumpy - 20 Nov 2005 19:38 GMT > It's not anesthesia. It's only sedation...a shot, not gas. I'm sure my vet > doesn't use the cheap stuff. It's not to pad the bill. I've read that in > order to get an accurate xray, the animal has to be as still as possible. > Sometimes just holding the animal down is not enough to keep the animal > completely still. It still does not sound right.
Wendy - 21 Nov 2005 14:43 GMT >> It's not anesthesia. It's only sedation...a shot, not gas. I'm sure my > vet [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > It still does not sound right. My Tigger was never very cooperative at the vets office. Took 5 people to get blood from her the last time she had that done and she was 18 and had arthritis. She had x-rays taken a few times over the course of her life without anesthesia. I think the last time she was in they said they would have to anesthetize her to get the one angle they wanted because she just wasn't cooperating AT ALL. I'm sure the vet wished he could have given her a 'chill pill' every time he saw her. She wasn't a very trusting kitty with anyone that didn't live with her.
W
Lumpy - 21 Nov 2005 17:46 GMT > > It still does not sound right. > > My Tigger was never very cooperative at the vets office. Took 5 people to > get blood from her the last time she had that done and she was 18 and had > arthritis. Oh my! She was a terror!
>She had x-rays taken a few times over the course of her life > without anesthesia. I think the last time she was in they said they would > have to anesthetize her to get the one angle they wanted because she just > wasn't cooperating AT ALL. I'm sure the vet wished he could have given her a > 'chill pill' every time he saw her. She wasn't a very trusting kitty with > anyone that didn't live with her. My first cat was so bad she started that snarly kind of screaming when she hit the door and any time anyone approached her, let along touched her, it sounded like they were skinning her alive. The funny thing is, she was all noise and never tried to bite the vets or techs. Still, by the time they got the iv out of her and put her in her carrier for me to take her home, I noticed that the vet techs' hands were shaking and they looked a bit pale.
:) Drama queens. Gotta love 'em. Back to blkcatgrl's problem--it seems to me that routinely sedating or anesthetizing cats for xrays is not a good idea. It is an overcomplication of a simple procedure that could get some cats into trouble.
treeline12345@yahoo.com - 20 Nov 2005 19:54 GMT > It's not anesthesia. It's only sedation...a shot, not gas. I'm sure my vet > doesn't use the cheap stuff. It's not to pad the bill. I've read that in > order to get an accurate xray, the animal has to be as still as possible. > Sometimes just holding the animal down is not enough to keep the animal > completely still. There's a very fine line between sedation and anesthesia. Was your cat just semi-conscious or unconscious at any time? Was she knocked out? If so, she was anesthetized although technically you could say sedated.
For example, ketamine can be used for both, depending on the amount. It's also used in street drugs. So a wide range from anesthesia for people and animals to getting knocked out ot just getting "high."
I'll give you a for instance. Fentanyl is a narcotic that is technically not an anesthetic. So it can be given by a nurse for "conscious sedation" [whatever the hell that means in hospital double-talk]. But the effect is exactly the same as an anesthetic. It knocks you out 100%. But a powerful anesthetic defined as such can only be given by an anesthesiologist but that knocks you out quicker than fentanyl and brings you back quicker so in some ways it is safer. The effect is the same. The anesthetic is a tad safer because it's quicker. But to me, they both act in seconds and I mean seconds.
In any event, if you trust this vet and think he's okay, did he run any tests on your cat to see why it took 2 days to come out of anesthesia? When my cat was spayed it took her a day to shake off the anesthetic but she was a tiny cat. Did he test her for an allergic response to the sedative? If not, why not? Well, this time around he should. And he should use a smaller dose and increase it later if necessary just to be on the safe side.
A gas can also be a sedative, like laughing gas or nitrous oxide? So I'm not sure at all how anesthetics differs from sedatives. It seems that some, like narcotics, can easily be both. Not all drugs can do both but many can.
I would hazard a will guess that he used ketamine.
You're right about holding an animal still and he may be worried about x-rays. Safer to knock out the animal and not be around the x-rays.
I don't know but you sound as though you are cautious and concerned. Good luck.
blkcatgal - 20 Nov 2005 21:01 GMT I think he was knocked out....and yes, it was probably ketamine that was used. It wasn't that he was knocked out for 2 days.....he woke up fine....he just seemed out of sorts and not his usual self for 2 days. I asked why and was told that some cats are affected differently and some take longer to be their normal selves.
I just wonder if it's worth delaying the xray for a week so that I can talk to my vet about it (as I said, tomorrow was the only day this week that my vet could do the xray).
>> It's not anesthesia. It's only sedation...a shot, not gas. I'm sure my >> vet [quoted text clipped - 42 lines] > I don't know but you sound as though you are cautious and concerned. > Good luck. -L. - 21 Nov 2005 05:10 GMT > I think he was knocked out....and yes, it was probably ketamine that was > used. It wasn't that he was knocked out for 2 days.....he woke up > fine....he just seemed out of sorts and not his usual self for 2 days. I > asked why and was told that some cats are affected differently and some take > longer to be their normal selves. It was probably a ketamine/acepromazine/atropine mix. That can knock a cat down for awhile, especially if the cat has compromised liver and kidney function. It's sort of antiquated protocol now, though. Did your vet do bloodwork to check for organ function?
> I just wonder if it's worth delaying the xray for a week so that I can talk > to my vet about it (as I said, tomorrow was the only day this week that my > vet could do the xray). I would. I would request a valium sedative, and if that's not enough, top it off with isofluorane. Some cats simply cannot be restrained well enough to get certain x-rays without some sort of sedative or anesthesia. -L.
treeline12345@yahoo.com - 20 Nov 2005 22:51 GMT > You're right about holding an animal still and he may be worried about > x-rays. Safer to knock out the animal and not be around the x-rays. Ketamine is cheaper and easier to use and does not require expensive equipment to administer.
Isoflurane is the safest and more expensive. Since it's a gas there is much more money involved in the equipment he has to purchase to use the gas. And it's probably a little more labor intensive than a shot of ketamine.
Can he test for safety? I believe that sensitivity tests can be done.
On the internet, Isoflurane is the drug of choice of knocking out felines and birds and dogs.
Now I did not mean your cat was out for 2 days, I only meant that the drug continued to act for 2 days. A well-administered knock-out drug wears off completely in a very short time, from minutes to a few hours at most. That's the optimal situation.
2 days with being a little out of it sounds as though your cat is either sensitive to the ketamine or too much was used.
As you search the internet, it appears that Isoflurane is the safest for all the animals, even those who are high risk.
http://www.bsdrescue.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=88&Itemid=41
ISOFLURANE
This gas anesthetic is commonly used today, and although it is expensive, its wide margin of safety compared to the older Metophane and Halothane, make it the drug of choice for most patients. Because 99% of Isoflurane leaves the body through breathing, animals begin to wake up almost as soon as the gas is turned off. Isoflurane doesn't depress the heart and doesn't have to be stored in the fat or processed by the liver or kidneys.
Geriatric or ill patients can be masked down with Isoflurane in minutes, then intubated and maintained on Iso during surgery. Animals usually begin to wake in 1-2 minutes once the isoflurane is turned off. It may be difficult to find a mask that fits the long, pointy Belgian face! [must be about dogs then]
KETAMINE (KETASET)
Ketamine has a wide margin of safety when used for anesthesia. Given along with Valium, Ketamine gives a quick, smooth induction in about 1 minute. Ketamine does not depress the heart rate, and while some animals seem to hold their breath, their oxygen levels usually remain adequate.
KETAMINE SHOULD NOT BE USED IN EPILEPTIC DOGS.
Rough recoveries with thrashing and screaming can sometimes be a problem with Ketamine, so patients should be carefully monitored. This excitement generally lasts only a few minutes. Recovery from Ketamine and Valium anesthesia usually occurs in 2-6 hours in young, healthy animals.
KETAMINE(Xylazine) Rompun is a potent sedative and muscle relaxer. It is also associated with a "higher incidence of anesthetic complications and death than any other commonly used preanesthetic" (1) It is often combined with Ketamine for general anesthesia.
The advantage to Rompun is that it can be given in the muscle, and occasionally, a patient is so intractable that hitting a vein or masking down is not an option. Also, the drug Yohimbine can be given to reverse the effects of Rompun.
Rompun slows the heart and may cause irregular heartbeats and low blood pressure. It may cause greatly depressed breathing, gastric bloating, vomiting, prolonged deep sleep. This drug should not be used in dogs with heart, lung, liver or kidney problems, and I have serious reservations about its use in any patient.
So it would seem that ketamine has more problems than Isoflurane.
Discussing this with your vet seems a good choice especially since your cat was under the weather for 2 days after the incident. That should not be for people or animals because it shows potential problems. Isoflurane has quick recovery. Ketamine should be worn after about 2 to 6 hours in the info above.
Don't mean to butt in but some just things to consider.
Willow - 20 Nov 2005 21:43 GMT The vet I work for didn't have to put Gaya to sleep to X-ray her.. now we're talking a very agressive cat (she bit anything that moved everytime she went in that office *blush*.. like thanks a lot for biting my boss!!!!) She gave her only a relaxant (don't know the correct english term, but it just mellowed her out did not put her to sleep) and hat was enough.. Ok it didn't mellow her all that much, it's Gaya we're talking about, but I was the one holding her, so it went kinda ok *look at the scar on my thumb* well kinda being the key word...
 Signature Will~
"... so that's how liberty ends, in a round of applause."
Queen Amidala, The revenge of the Syth.
> It's not anesthesia. It's only sedation...a shot, not gas. I'm sure my vet > doesn't use the cheap stuff. It's not to pad the bill. I've read that in [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > > This is a warning sign in addition to the sedation in the first place. > > Does he have assistants to help him who are competent? Phil P. - 20 Nov 2005 23:01 GMT > It's not anesthesia. It's only sedation...a shot, not gas. I'm sure my vet > doesn't use the cheap stuff. It's not to pad the bill. I've read that in > order to get an accurate xray, the animal has to be as still as possible. > Sometimes just holding the animal down is not enough to keep the animal > completely still. That's absolutely correct. Unreadable x-rays require repeated x-rays and each successive attempt increases the cat's stress levels to the point where getting a useful x-ray without sedation will be impossible. If you have a fractious cat, mild sedation is probably necessary and would make the procedure much less stressful for him and would allow the vet to get clear and useful x-rays.
However, for such a brief procedure, I would insist on only a rapid acting, ultra-short acting, non-cumulative, non-barbiturate agent such as Propofol. Complete recovery in cats takes less than 10 minutes- usually about 5 minutes for mild sedation. We use Propofol all the time as a pre-induction agent and have never had any adverse effects in cats. The only problem with Propofol is that once the vial is opened, what ever drug that is not used must be thrown away because it doesn't contain any preservatives. So your vet will most likely charge you for the entire vial- about $65+.
The most important question is, do *you* think your cat is so difficult to handle that he needs to be sedated? We rarely need to sedate a cat- other than ferals- for x-rays. If you don't feel its necessary, I'd get a second opinion.
Best of luck,
Phil
treeline12345@yahoo.com - 20 Nov 2005 23:24 GMT > However, for such a brief procedure, I would insist on only a rapid acting, > ultra-short acting, non-cumulative, non-barbiturate agent such as Propofol. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > must be thrown away because it doesn't contain any preservatives. So your > vet will most likely charge you for the entire vial- about $65+. propofol or profofol [have seen both spellings] (Diprivan) is a full-bore anesthetic when used with humans and can only be administered by an anesthesiologist or some such but i agree completely that the current drug of choice using the needle. extremely quick acting and quick recovery time. but if all the bottle must be used, then more expensive than Isoflurane? but that requires much more delivery equipment than a hypodermic needle since it's a gast.
when you use propofol, what do you monitor, heartbeat via ecg/ekg, oxygen uptake, some sort of capnograph for oxygen saturation? that's about all that's needed or what more?
is it safer than Isoflurane or just a lot less hassle than the gas and equipment so much cheaper than having to bother gas administering equipment and much simpler to administer, especially if having to do several felines at the same time, probably too expensive to buy multiple sets of gas administering equipment.
> The most important question is, do *you* think your cat is so difficult to > handle that he [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Phil who holds the cat steady for the x-ray? could that be the problem? vet not wanting to get exposed too often? that's certainly a consideration especially if his equipment is not the newer types that use much less radiation. i think the digital x-rays are more efficient in this regard, are they not?
Phil P. - 20 Nov 2005 23:35 GMT > propofol or profofol [have seen both spellings] (Diprivan) is a Yes, I know what Propofol is. Thanks.
> is it safer than Isoflurane Its usually used as a pre-induction agent before Iso. Its very short acting so it can be used for short procedures such as x-rays or dental exams in fractious cats.
blkcatgal - 20 Nov 2005 23:44 GMT Well, this cat can be difficult sometimes (I have scars to prove it). And I think my vet sedates for x-rays as precaution...to make sure to get a good, readable x-ray. I really am in a quandry here. I can ask about the sedative you mentioned (I really don't care about the cost) but I am suppose to drop my cat off first thing in the morning and I'm not sure if I will have an oppportunity to talk with my vet then. I could just cancel...but then I may have to wait a week before having the x-ray done.
My cat is still limping, however, today it didn't seem quite as pronounced. And he ran across the yard today. Would a cat that had something seriously wrong with it do that???
>> It's not anesthesia. It's only sedation...a shot, not gas. I'm sure my > vet [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > > Phil No More Retail - 20 Nov 2005 23:55 GMT You forgot to mention the cat is a handful now we understand why the vet sedates the cat.
Call the vet; there has to be some one there to open, before you go to see if there is an alternative to the shot sedation. And make sure you explain why you are asking tell the vet what happens to the firball. As some of the others said it sounds like too much sedation or an allergic reaction to the sedation. The cat is old so you want to be as cautious as possible
If not ask if the vet can recommend a place where there is an option. If the vet hesitates find another vet.
Do you have an animal hospital nearby that might be able to do the xray and you can drop it off at your vet's
Phil P. - 20 Nov 2005 23:56 GMT > Well, this cat can be difficult sometimes (I have scars to prove it). And I > think my vet sedates for x-rays as precaution...to make sure to get a good, > readable x-ray. If he routinely sedates cats for x-rays, I would find another vet. I don't think its a good policy. With an assistant, he should be able to x-ray the vast majority or cats without sedation- my vet manages.
I really am in a quandry here. I can ask about the
> sedative you mentioned (I really don't care about the cost) but I am suppose > to drop my cat off first thing in the morning and I'm not sure if I will > have an oppportunity to talk with my vet then. I could just cancel...but > then I may have to wait a week before having the x-ray done. Are there any other vets in your area with whom you can get an early appointment?
> My cat is still limping, however, today it didn't seem quite as pronounced. > And he ran across the yard today. Would a cat that had something seriously > wrong with it do that??? Cats are infamous for masking pain- its instinct. Since he's been limping for about week, I wouldn't wait to get him x-rayed- but I also wouldn't rush off to a vet that routinely sedates cats. Tough call, Sue. I think I'd go for a second opinion.
Good luck,
Phil
treeline12345@yahoo.com - 20 Nov 2005 23:58 GMT > Well, this cat can be difficult sometimes (I have scars to prove it). And I > think my vet sedates for x-rays as precaution...to make sure to get a good, [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > And he ran across the yard today. Would a cat that had something seriously > wrong with it do that??? Nope. Unlikely. If a broken bone or ligament, impossible. Sounds like the fellow is on the mend. I'm not a vet but from what I have seen of injuries in general, nobody runs across anything who is seriously injured. Give your buddy some TLC and that will buy you time to talk to the vet about the questions we all raised here. Offhand, this no longer sounds like an emergency - unless his running does some damage but cats are pretty clever about their bodies.
5cats - 21 Nov 2005 00:31 GMT > Well, this cat can be difficult sometimes (I have scars to prove it). > And I think my vet sedates for x-rays as precaution...to make sure to [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > pronounced. And he ran across the yard today. Would a cat that had > something seriously wrong with it do that??? What about the vomiting you mentioned in your first message? has that continued?
BTW, 3 of my cats have had x-rays done at some point and none needed to be sedated.
blkcatgal - 21 Nov 2005 01:19 GMT No, he hasn't vomited in over 24 hours. And he ate pretty good today.
>> Well, this cat can be difficult sometimes (I have scars to prove it). >> And I think my vet sedates for x-rays as precaution...to make sure to [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > BTW, 3 of my cats have had x-rays done at some point and none needed to > be sedated. PawsForThought - 21 Nov 2005 03:02 GMT > It's not anesthesia. It's only sedation...a shot, not gas. I'm sure my vet > doesn't use the cheap stuff. It's not to pad the bill. I've read that in > order to get an accurate xray, the animal has to be as still as possible. > Sometimes just holding the animal down is not enough to keep the animal > completely still. Is it Ketamine that your vet is giving your cat? That stuff is bad news in my experience. Since you said your cat took 2 days to fully recover, I would suspect it was something like Ketamine.
Phil P. - 21 Nov 2005 03:23 GMT > > It's not anesthesia. It's only sedation...a shot, not gas. I'm sure my vet > > doesn't use the cheap stuff. It's not to pad the bill. I've read that in [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > news in my experience. Since you said your cat took 2 days to fully > recover, I would suspect it was something like Ketamine. Ketamine is nasty stuff. A lot of vets swear by it because its so cheap. Its also the anesthetic most vets were taught in school. The cat's eyes remain open while they're under (scary sight) so their eyes must be lubricated and protected. Recovery is awful- the cats stumble around for hours. Its must be a horrible experience for them because they don't understand what's wrong. Very disturbing to watch.
The only recovery precaution you have to take with Iso after surgery is to make sure the cat receives pain medication because the recovery is so rapid. Otherwise, the cat will wake up in pain.
Phil
PawsForThought - 21 Nov 2005 20:22 GMT > "PawsForThought" <Mickey4Paws@anonymous.to> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > hours. Its must be a horrible experience for them because they don't > understand what's wrong. Very disturbing to watch. I'm really trying to remember what one of my cats got that's similar to Ketamine. This was perhaps 15 or 20 years ago. I think it was something called Telazol. I will never forget her reaction to it. Horrible!!!!!!!! :( I never took her back to that vet.
> The only recovery precaution you have to take with Iso after surgery is to > make sure the cat receives pain medication because the recovery is so rapid. > Otherwise, the cat will wake up in pain. Both my cats got something for pain after the Iso when they got spayed/neutered. Torbogesic maybe?? I can't remember. When I picked them up, they were acting completely normal and wide awake, and not like cats I've had in the past who got injectibles only.
Phil P. - 21 Nov 2005 21:10 GMT > > "PawsForThought" <Mickey4Paws@anonymous.to> wrote in message
> I'm really trying to remember what one of my cats got that's similar to > Ketamine. This was perhaps 15 or 20 years ago. I think it was > something called Telazol. I will never forget her reaction to it. > Horrible!!!!!!!! :( I never took her back to that vet. Yep! Telazol. Its a combination of tiletamine-zolazepam. That's another nasty "dissociative anesthetic" . Tiletamine is a drug like ketamine, and zolazepam is a drug like valium. Recovery from Telazol takes even longer than from ketamine and is even more nerve-wracking to watch because it takes so long. I hate what that stuff does to cats- and all dissociative anesthetics.
> > The only recovery precaution you have to take with Iso after surgery is to > > make sure the cat receives pain medication because the recovery is so rapid. > > Otherwise, the cat will wake up in pain. > > Both my cats got something for pain after the Iso when they got > spayed/neutered. Torbogesic maybe?? I can't remember. Yep. Can you believe vets weren't sure if cats felt pain after spaying and needed studies??? How about that study on post-declawing pain? You remember that. They found cats could be in pain for >3 weeks and yet most vets never gave any pain meds at all. Makes me furious.
When I picked
> them up, they were acting completely normal and wide awake, and not > like cats I've had in the past who got injectibles only. Recovery is even better in kittens- They can't wait to start playing again 5 minutes after surgery- gotta hold them back for a little while!
Phil
PawsForThought - 23 Nov 2005 00:19 GMT > > > "PawsForThought" <Mickey4Paws@anonymous.to> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > so long. I hate what that stuff does to cats- and all dissociative > anesthetics. No wonder she was such a wreck :( She was so out of it when I went to pick her up. But the vet clinic was closing for the night and I knew no one would be there to watch my cat so I took her home. I ended up calling the emergency vet because I was so worried. It was a tough call to make, whether to bring her in there or keep her at home. I decided to keep her at home and watch her, which is ultimately what the emergency clinic suggested. I confined her and also kept the room dark. There was no doubt in my mind that she was hallucinating from that crap. Oh, and when I first had taken her to the vet, I told them very clearly that she was sensitive to anesthesia so please be extra careful. Argh!
> > > The only recovery precaution you have to take with Iso after surgery is > to [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > that. They found cats could be in pain for >3 weeks and yet most vets never > gave any pain meds at all. Makes me furious. Me too :( Bastards!
treeline12345@yahoo.com - 21 Nov 2005 13:36 GMT > It's not anesthesia. It's only sedation...a shot, not gas. I'm sure my vet > doesn't use the cheap stuff. It's not to pad the bill. I've read that in > order to get an accurate xray, the animal has to be as still as possible. > Sometimes just holding the animal down is not enough to keep the animal > completely still. If it's ketamine, as you said in a different post, and that is the cheap drug as other posters pointed out, are you still sure?
I don't with to impugn anything to your vet but as others have suggested, routine sedation with ketamine is now a bit of a no-no. It's probably quicker and uses fewer assistants but with a cat that is 16 years of age, that's dangerous. Especially dangerous if he forgot to factor in that at that age you need much, much less anesthetic. I'm guessing here but I usually read as a living creature ages, it needs less drugs because the body is less efficient in eliminating that drug from the blood.
Legally ketamine is cheap. It's only expensive when it's stolen from a vet's office and sold illegally as a street drug. But that is not the situation with your senior cat :)
> <treeline12345@yahoo.com> wrote in message > > That's a bad sign. Did the vet use the expensive stuff or the cheap [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Does your cat really need sedation or is the vet just adding on extras > > to the bill?
|
|
|