> >I will post my results here.
>
> Results of what??
>> >I will post my results here.
>>
>> Results of what??
>
>I will never understand how people can bear to read newsgroups
>unthreaded.
It is simple netiquette to include a snippet when you are replying,
and easier than NOT to with most news readers.
treeline12345@yahoo.com - 28 Sep 2005 18:22 GMT
> >> >I will post my results here.
> >> Results of what??
> >I will never understand how people can bear to read newsgroups
> >unthreaded.
> It is simple netiquette to include a snippet when you are replying,
> and easier than NOT to with most news readers.
This is not so with Google News now. In all fairness to the original
poster, it's really the fault of Google News. If you use the obvious
reply button, it brings up a box. What you type in the box is only what
appears. It's not obvious that it discards all the previous posts. Took
me a few posts before I now go to the very top where there is another
Reply buried under the "Show Options" that does include the previously
posted material.
I suspect that Google is doing this on purpose to cut down bandwidth. I
have used a news reader, in unix, that would _not+ let me post at first
if I included too much previous material! And that newsreader, tin, did
so for the same reasons.
Jennifer - 28 Sep 2005 23:42 GMT
> >I will never understand how people can bear to read newsgroups
> >unthreaded.
>
> It is simple netiquette to include a snippet when you are replying,
> and easier than NOT to with most news readers.
I know; I always try to do so, myself, even though I use Google groups
these days (which does not quote by default, as Treeline mentioned) .
It would just make me crazy not to have messages threaded. It's the
first thing I configure any time I set up a newsreader.
--
Jennifer