Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / Health and Behavior / March 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Male/Female dominance prob

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Cheryl Rogers - 28 Feb 2004 14:48 GMT
Hi group,

I hope someone here can help me with this. I have had two female cats,
adopted from the shelter together, for about four years. Recently a
male cat has adopted us. He is grown but still young, and we did have
him neutered when he decided to stay with us. The two females tolerate
him, one more than the other, but they don't really like him.

Lately we have been having bathroom issues: *somebody* has been peeing
on the bathroom rug and in the houseplants. I think we have figured
out the problem. When the females are in the litterbox, the male
sneaks up on them and attacks them as they are leaving it. So now they
don't want to go to the litter box. I don't blame them.

How do I fix this? Move the litterbox? Chunk the male outside every
night? Teach the females to use the toilet?

Cheryl
Karen Chuplis - 28 Feb 2004 14:53 GMT
> Hi group,
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Cheryl

How many boxes do you have? Is there an alternate place for them to go?

Karen
Cheryl Rogers - 28 Feb 2004 15:09 GMT
Two boxes, both in the upstairs tub, which is why it is so easy for
the Troll to sneak up on them--they can't see him. All of them are
indoor/outdoor cats though, and they go outside as well. I have toyed
with the idea of putting a litterbox outside, but what if it rains? :-)

Cheryl

>>Hi group,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Karen
Joe Canuck - 28 Feb 2004 15:39 GMT
> Two boxes, both in the upstairs tub, which is why it is so easy for the
> Troll to sneak up on them--they can't see him. All of them are
> indoor/outdoor cats though, and they go outside as well. I have toyed
> with the idea of putting a litterbox outside, but what if it rains? :-)

Are the litter boxes covered? If so, remove the covers.

Now, your young male cat cannot be in two places at the same time.

I'd suggest getting two more litter boxes, then place the four boxes you
will have each in a different location in your home.

Signature

"Its the bugs that keep it running."
                                     -Joe Canuck

Alison - 28 Feb 2004 21:32 GMT
> Two boxes, both in the upstairs tub, which is why it is so easy for
> the Troll to sneak up on them--they can't see him. All of them are
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Cheryl

 Hi Cheryl,
 You could dig over a patch of soil outside and the cats can use that
.
But why not move the boxes from the bath and position them in a place
where they *can" see the  Troll and won't get ambushed.
Alison
Cheryl Rogers - 28 Feb 2004 22:40 GMT
Thanks, Alison. Though we have a two-story house, our rooms are fairly
small and there are not many places to have a litterbox. We used to
have a box in our bathroom downstairs but Cleo kept waking us up at 5
am with loud and lengthy scratching. So:

- I have put another litterbox in the guest room, which is otherwise
crammed with stuff, but I really don't think that will work long-term
because it is not far enough away from the other boxes.

- I am going to buy some play sand and make an outdoor sandbox for
them in the side yard. They are making a mess of the yard anyway.

- I will raise the litterboxes in the tub with phone books or
something so they can see Sullivan the Troll. I think his little game
won't be as much fun if he can't sneak up on them.

- AND, I really am going to try to train them to use the toilet. They
are very smart and I think it would be nifty.

Thanks to all who responded. If you have any more ideas, please keep
'em coming.

Cheryl

>>Two boxes, both in the upstairs tub, which is why it is so easy for
>>the Troll to sneak up on them--they can't see him. All of them are
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> where they *can" see the  Troll and won't get ambushed.
>  Alison
zuzu22@webtv.net - 29 Feb 2004 19:53 GMT
> I have put another litterbox in the
> guest room, which is otherwise crammed
> with stuff, but I really don't think
> that will work long-term because it is
> not far enough away from the other
> boxes.

The point is not how far away the box is, but if there is an easy escape
route in case the cat gets ambushed. A litterbox in a guestroom will not
only allow the cat using it to see what's coming, but will probably give
it some room so it doesn't get cornered.

> - I am going to buy some play sand and
> make an outdoor sandbox for them in the
> side yard. They are making a mess of the
> yard anyway.

This is a bad idea. They will likely use it to urinate and defecate in,
as will other neighborhood cats, and it will stink to high heaven in no
time.

> - I will raise the litterboxes in the
> tub with phone books or something so
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> them to use the toilet. They are very
> smart and I think it would be nifty.

It's NOT "nifty." Training a cat to use a toilet should NOT be done and
is completely unnatural. It could create MORE innappropriate elimination
problems and also puts your cats at risk for serious injury and possible
drowning if they were to be ambushed while trying to balance
precariously on a slippery toilet seat. There are many reasons forcing a
cat to use a human toilet is just wrong, and you can read more here:
http://community.webtv.net/zuzu22/toilettraining

Last, but not least...ignore Iben Getiner. He is a well known troll who
consistently posts reccommending the mutilation or discarding of pet
cats. It would be a scary thing if you actually agree with anything he
says.

Megan

                                   
Signature


"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do
nothing."

-Edmund Burke

Learn The TRUTH About Declawing
http://www.stopdeclaw.com

Zuzu's Cats Photo Album:
http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22

"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one
elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and
splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then
providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision,
raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and
material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his
way."

- W.H. Murray

Cheryl Rogers - 29 Feb 2004 23:38 GMT
> The point is not how far away the box is, but if there is an easy escape
> route in case the cat gets ambushed. A litterbox in a guestroom will not
> only allow the cat using it to see what's coming, but will probably give
> it some room so it doesn't get cornered.

Thank you. But this is precisely my point. The guest room adjoins the
bathroom in question, so there would not be an easy escape route. I'm
sorry I did not make this clear earlier.

> This is a bad idea. They will likely use it to urinate and defecate in,
> as will other neighborhood cats, and it will stink to high heaven in no
> time.

I'm afraid you misunderstood my intentions. I want a drainable,
cleanable place for them to urinate and defecate that is outside and
wouldn't matter if it rains. As it is, they are destroying my front
lawn for this purpose. Moreover, the dog has recently taken to
coprophagia and a cleanable sandbox would limit her opportunities,
should the cats choose the sand instead of the front lawn.

> It's NOT "nifty." Training a cat to use a toilet should NOT be done and
> is completely unnatural. It could create MORE innappropriate elimination
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> cat to use a human toilet is just wrong, and you can read more here:
> http://community.webtv.net/zuzu22/toilettraining 

Your opinion is duly noted, and I appreciate the time you took to help
me out. I have a different opinion, and a modicum of common sense. I
do not "force" my cats to do anything--the idea is laughable! :-)

> Last, but not least...ignore Iben Getiner. He is a well known troll who
> consistently posts reccommending the mutilation or discarding of pet
> cats. It would be a scary thing if you actually agree with anything he
> says.

Thanks for the heads up. If he repeatedly posts this kind of message,
I will put him in my killfile. However, in this instance, if Sullivan
the Troll gets so aggressive toward my female cats that their mental
or physical health is endangered, then I *will* find him a suitable
home in another town. I will miss him, but, well, I run this house,
not the Troll.

Cheryl
Cathy Friedmann - 01 Mar 2004 00:37 GMT
> > It's NOT "nifty." Training a cat to use a toilet should NOT be done and
> > is completely unnatural. It could create MORE innappropriate elimination
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> me out. I have a different opinion, and a modicum of common sense. I
> do not "force" my cats to do anything--the idea is laughable! :-)

Leaving the "forcing" bit out of the deal...  I did not look at the link to
see what con reasons were enumerated there, but... Even though it *sounds*
cool at first, it really isn't such a hot idea, for a variety of reasons.

> > Last, but not least...ignore Iben Getiner. He is a well known troll who
> > consistently posts reccommending the mutilation or discarding of pet
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Thanks for the heads up. If he repeatedly posts this kind of message,
> I will put him in my killfile.

You may want to; depends upon you tolerance level.  Without doing a Google
search (& heaven forbid I relay the info just a bit off!), he has posted -
among other inanities - that he doesn't tolerate a cat's kneading (IIRC, the
cat was kneading on his wife) because (acc. to him) it meant the cat was
having sex/masturbating, whatever.

> However, in this instance, if Sullivan
> the Troll gets so aggressive toward my female cats that their mental
> or physical health is endangered, then I *will* find him a suitable
> home in another town. I will miss him, but, well, I run this house,
> not the Troll.

Otoh, that's not the same as what IBen said, about turning the cat outdoors.

Two of my cats did not get along, at *all*, for a l-o-n-g time - the older
one was absolutely paranoid about the newcomer usurping her top-cat
position.  Despite a very, very careful & very, very s--l--o--w intro, she
was still incredibly paranoid.  The situation gradually became tolerable.
It took about 2 years before the older one would be calm enough to eat in
the presence of/next to the younger one.  They are still - after 4+ years,
not buddies (& may never be), but she now tolerates him.   Times heals all,
sort of deal.

Cathy

--
"Staccato signals of constant information..."
("The Boy in the Bubble")  Paul Simon
IBen Getiner - 01 Mar 2004 05:36 GMT
<snip>

> Last, but not least...ignore Iben Getiner. He is a well known troll who
> consistently posts reccommending the mutilation or discarding of pet
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>                                    

Mutilation? Another lie! Prove it! You're the one who sponsors cruel
and totally unnecessary mutilation upon the feline world. YOU go for
the sexual mutilation thing. Unnecessary, cruel and barbarous, these
'spayings' and 'neuterings are.' Cruel in the extreme. And for what?
For your convenience, that's what.
If you're talking about declawing, yes... I highly recommend it. We
had ours done front and rear when we got our new furniture. It was
either that or out he goes.
I wonder just what kind of a world we would have for cats if people
like YOU ran the show... Instead of bringing in a cat and making it a
pet, it would just have to go unadopted. Who could stand what they do
to the furniture? Many little fellows and girls would meet a grim fate
thanks to selfish liberals such as yourself.
As long as it's legal, you've got nothing to say against me.

                           IBen Getiner
Wendy - 01 Mar 2004 18:03 GMT
zuzu22@webtv.net wrote in message
news:<25246-4042432E-170@storefull-3192.bay.webtv.net>...
<snip>

> Last, but not least...ignore Iben Getiner. He is a well known troll who
> consistently posts reccommending the mutilation or discarding of pet
> cats. It would be a scary thing if you actually agree with anything he
> says.
>
> Megan

Mutilation? Another lie! Prove it! You're the one who sponsors cruel
and totally unnecessary mutilation upon the feline world. YOU go for
the sexual mutilation thing. Unnecessary, cruel and barbarous, these
'spayings' and 'neuterings are.' Cruel in the extreme. And for what?
For your convenience, that's what.
If you're talking about declawing, yes... I highly recommend it. We
had ours done front and rear when we got our new furniture. It was
either that or out he goes.
I wonder just what kind of a world we would have for cats if people
like YOU ran the show... Instead of bringing in a cat and making it a
pet, it would just have to go unadopted. Who could stand what they do
to the furniture? Many little fellows and girls would meet a grim fate
thanks to selfish liberals such as yourself.
As long as it's legal, you've got nothing to say against me.

                           IBen Getiner

Well that's some convoluted logic. I think you just proved Megan's point.

W
IBen Getiner - 28 Feb 2004 20:53 GMT
> Hi group,
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Cheryl

Well, the solution to your problem is quite obvious to me. It's
probably obvious to you too, except you just don't want to face it.
Get rid of the male! We had a similar problem with a female we tried
to introduce into the pride a few years ago. Our original cat (a male)
was happy and innocent until we brought little Miss queenie into our
home. After that, he spent all his waking hours keeping her isolated
in one room of the house. This just so he could hang onto some
semblance of normalcy from his former safe secure life. It could not
go on, and I was very glad that we didn't go ahead and have her
declawed right off. My wife had to make the "heartbreaking" decision
that it just wasn't going to fly, and then I did my job: I booted her
out of our house.
Now, no more hissing fights at the litterboxes. No more intimidation.
No more reason to excessively sent-mark. All is as it was before. We
still feed the little creepette, but outside you know.

                              IBen Getiner
Cheryl Rogers - 28 Feb 2004 22:44 GMT
> Well, the solution to your problem is quite obvious to me. It's
> probably obvious to you too, except you just don't want to face it.
> Get rid of the male!
>
>                                IBen Getiner

Thanks. I hope it won't come to that. I said to my husband this
morning after he stepped on a wet rug in his bare feet, "Well, I think
we have a dominance problem more than a bathroom problem." And he
looked at me and said, "No..... THEY have a dominance problem. WE have
a bathroom problem."

So while I do not argue that your solution was the best for your
household, in fact I commend you for your courage, I am hoping to
solve both the cats' problems and mine!

Cheryl
Laura R. - 29 Feb 2004 00:32 GMT
circa Sat, 28 Feb 2004 16:44:21 -0600, in rec.pets.cats.health+behav,
Cheryl Rogers (cheryl@NOSPAMwilstream.com) said,
> So while I do not argue that your solution was the best for your

The post to which you are responding is a troll. Ignore it.

Laura
Signature

I am Dyslexia of Borg,
Your a.s will be laminated.

Cathy Friedmann - 29 Feb 2004 00:40 GMT
I

> > Well, the solution to your problem is quite obvious to me. It's
> > probably obvious to you too, except you just don't want to face it.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Thanks. I hope it won't come to that.

IBen Getiner's been around before, & has pretty much proven himself to be a
troll.

Cathy

--
"Staccato signals of constant information..."
("The Boy in the Bubble")  Paul Simon

I said to my husband this
> morning after he stepped on a wet rug in his bare feet, "Well, I think
> we have a dominance problem more than a bathroom problem." And he
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Cheryl
Mary - 29 Feb 2004 16:48 GMT
> IBen Getiner's been around before, & has pretty much proven himself to be a
> troll.

Even if he weren't a troll his name tells you he's a moron, at the
very least.
Cathy Friedmann - 29 Feb 2004 17:08 GMT
> > IBen Getiner's been around before, & has pretty much proven himself
> to be a
> > troll.
>
> Even if he weren't a troll his name tells you he's a moron, at the
> very least.

Yeah, I pointed that out to him - that his user name, in itself, smacks of a
trollish nature to me - when he first showed up & posted rather off-the-wall
posts, perhaps intending to incite.  He blew it off - my comment; as if the
user name was nothing.

Come to think of it - that, along w/ this thread's subject line, along w/
some of his previous posts...

Cathy

--
"Staccato signals of constant information..."
("The Boy in the Bubble")  Paul Simon
IBen Getiner - 29 Feb 2004 23:29 GMT
> > > IBen Getiner's been around before, & has pretty much proven himself
>  to be a
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Cathy

Oh, I see.... Then that would explain why my first posting in this
group (Sept. 14th 2002) came TWO YEARS after my first posting using my
Lappcatt name! What a friggin' moron.
Here. Look for yourself, you simple-Simon Tweedle-Dee...

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&scoring=d&selm=c6f07bc7.02091
41315.2a5c3858%40posting.google.com


Also, I am reposting ME EXPLAINING TO YOU YOU about my name from
way-back-when. It's the same story then as now, Oh touched one.

From: IBen Getiner (Iappcatt@aol.com)
Subject: Re: Hill's w/d for CRF???
   
View this article only   
Newsgroups: rec.pets.cats.health+behav
Date: 2002-09-28 21:40:32 PST
   
> Based on the content of a whole bunch of posts I've seen from IBen Getiner
> (never mind his screen name in itself!) I'd put no store in any of his
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> > -Jen
> > If a pig loses its voice, is it disgruntled?

The bit about my screen name... what's wrong with it? This is the
second time someone's mentioned it. If it has something to do with the
'catt' in my address, I've been using that in one of two forms since
1999. I was lappcatt@webtv.net before I got a computer (had webtv
then) and have been iappcatt@aol ever since (IBen Getiner has been a
constant).
Check out my posting history on Google.com if you don't believe me.
Simply go there and then go to 'groups', then type in IBen Getiner.
Enjoy.
As far as my observation, I do feel that the animal is simple showing
it's age. The kidneys usually go out first, don't they?

Source:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&threadm=5XAr9.49504%24qb.4289
7%40nwrddc01.gnilink.net&scoring=d&prev=/groups%3Fhl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DISO-885
9-1%26scoring%3Dd%26q%3Dlappcatt%40webtv.net%2Bcats


See Lappcatt's 1st posting... 3/20/2000

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=8206-38D60AED-2%40storef
ull-298.iap.bryant.webtv.net


See....? Wrong again. Face it... You just don't like me because you
know I'm smarter than you.

                               IBen Getiner
Meghan Noecker - 01 Mar 2004 00:45 GMT
>Oh, I see.... Then that would explain why my first posting in this
>group (Sept. 14th 2002) came TWO YEARS after my first posting using my
>Lappcatt name! What a friggin' moron.

I believe the issue has nothing to with the lappcat name.

I see your name "IBen Getiner" as an abbreviation for:
"I been getting her" or "I been getting in her".

Both do not sound very nice to me.

Meghan & the Zoo Crew  
Equine and Pet Photography
http://www.zoocrewphoto.com
Cathy Friedmann - 01 Mar 2004 00:46 GMT
> >Oh, I see.... Then that would explain why my first posting in this
> >group (Sept. 14th 2002) came TWO YEARS after my first posting using my
> >Lappcatt name! What a friggin' moron.
>
> I believe the issue has nothing to with the lappcat name.

Right.

> I see your name "IBen Getiner" as an abbreviation for:
> "I been getting her" or "I been getting in her".

Yep.

> Both do not sound very nice to me.

Nope.

Cathy

--
"Staccato signals of constant information..."
("The Boy in the Bubble")  Paul Simon
IBen Getiner - 11 Mar 2004 09:31 GMT
> >Oh, I see.... Then that would explain why my first posting in this
> >group (Sept. 14th 2002) came TWO YEARS after my first posting using my
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Equine and Pet Photography
> http://www.zoocrewphoto.com

You have a dirty mind. That's what your problem is, and I shall prove
it. Men call everything 'her'. Ask a man hard at work removing a tree
stump how it's going and you might here... "I'm a-gettin' 'er". Our
cars are 'shes'. Our boats are 'her'. Our guns are 'shes'. We even
label wimpy men as 'our wemen'.
If I was 'IDunn Hadder', I'd say you have a point. But I'm not. I'm
IBen Getiner.
Your problem is, you don't understand the mindset of men.

                         IBen Getiner
IBen Getiner - 29 Feb 2004 23:31 GMT
> > IBen Getiner's been around before, & has pretty much proven himself
>  to be a
> > troll.
>
> Even if he weren't a troll his name tells you he's a moron, at the
> very least.

I don't know you. But I will.
IBen Getiner - 29 Feb 2004 23:36 GMT
> > Well, the solution to your problem is quite obvious to me. It's
> > probably obvious to you too, except you just don't want to face it.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Cheryl

Glad to have been able to help, Cheryl. It was a real problem with us
too. We gave it a lot of time to boot, but to no avail. But cats being
the pack animals that they are, they tent to have some real issues
about territory. Good luck.

Oh, one more thing. Be careful to give your original cats much
affection and attention during this time. Otherwise, you might end up
with a nasty cat bite out of jealousy.

                               IBen Getiner
Cathy Friedmann - 01 Mar 2004 00:22 GMT
> But cats being the pack animals that they are,

Facetious?  Straight?

Cathy

--
"Staccato signals of constant information..."
("The Boy in the Bubble")  Paul Simon
Mary - 01 Mar 2004 17:14 GMT
> > But cats being the pack animals that they are,
>
> Facetious?  Straight?
>
> Cathy

Stupid?
Cathy Friedmann - 01 Mar 2004 21:32 GMT
> > > But cats being the pack animals that they are,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Stupid?

If a 'straight' answer, yes.  Or at least ignorant.

Cathy

--
"Staccato signals of constant information..."
("The Boy in the Bubble")  Paul Simon
Laura R. - 02 Mar 2004 02:06 GMT
circa Mon, 01 Mar 2004 17:14:28 GMT, in rec.pets.cats.health+behav,
Mary (rosefan@email.com) said,
> > > But cats being the pack animals that they are,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Stupid?

You do have a way with the quips... :-)

Laura
Signature

Quoting: The act of repeating erroneously the words of another.
--Ambrose Bierce


Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.