>Mam,
>
>I found your remark to be very cruel. Janet was just asking for help,
>not to be ridiculed for her choice of kitten,
I'm not sure what post you are referring to; I looked back and didn't see
anyone ridiculed.
I too have a munchkin and
>can assure you that even though she might have tiny legs, she can jump
>high and do anything another cat can do with long legs.
Then why was your choice a Munchkin?
>sweetest most lovable cat I have ever had. Numerous studies have been
>done that prove that they are one hundred percent healthy,
No, they are not 100% healthy. No breed is. Yes, some Munchkins *do* have back
problems, as well as hip displasia.
, unlike
>dachshund that have back problems.
Dachshunds are dogs, and bred hundreds of years ago to hunt burrowing animals.
Munchkins began being bred in the 1980's, simply because someone thought they
looked cute.
Furthermore, they are a recognized
>breed and Cat Fancy has written articles about them (a recognized
>magazine).
Cat Fancy is a storybook that prostitutes itself to its advertisers.
So please, next time someone asks a question answer it or
>move on, do not criticize the individual.
No one criticized the individual, unless I am missing a post. All I saw were
opinions on the Munchkin.
It you want to stand on your
>litter box, do it somewhere else, not here.
If you want to come on a newsgroup and tout the wonders of buying/owning a
novelty breed, don't do it here. The Munchkin is the product of select breeding
for the purpose of perpetuating a genetic defect. Period.
I have a polydactyl. He's cute. He's lovable. He's very smart. He's so
dexterous with his extra toes he is able to use them like hands. Do I think he
should be bred to product more cute cats like him? NO.
Sherry
Sherry