Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / Health and Behavior / January 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

China Confirms Case, Begins Civet Cat Cull

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Raul & Mini - 05 Jan 2004 21:34 GMT
   
  Latest Developments
Reuters Photo
China Confirms Case, Begins Civet Cat Cull
(Reuters) - China confirmed on Monday its first SARS case since a world
epidemic was declared over in July, and began a mass slaughter of civet
cats on fears a new strain of the deadly virus may have jumped from wild
animals to humans. Health officials in the southern province of
Guangdong said a virus gene sample from the SARS patient -- a
32-year-old television producer -- resembled that of a coronavirus found
in civet cats, a Chinese culinary delicacy.
Yngver - 05 Jan 2004 21:48 GMT
To head off any confusion here, I just want to point out that civets are not
cats but are related to the mongoose. Which makes me wonder why this is posted
in a cat ng.

>  Latest Developments
>Reuters Photo
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>32-year-old television producer -- resembled that of a coronavirus found
>in civet cats, a Chinese culinary delicacy.
Diane L. Schirf - 06 Jan 2004 02:21 GMT
> To head off any confusion here, I just want to point out that civets are not
> cats but are related to the mongoose. Which makes me wonder why this is posted
> in a cat ng.

Because the IDIOTS who write headlines keep putting out there, "China to
kill 10,000 cats," etc.

I think the killing of civets is equally appalling, but it irks me that
alleged writers are misleading the public.

Signature

http://www.mindspring.com/~slywy/
http://slywy.diaryland.com/

hamandcheese@betweentheknees.com - 06 Jan 2004 05:43 GMT
>> To head off any confusion here, I just want to point out that civets are not
>> cats but are related to the mongoose. Which makes me wonder why this is posted
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>I think the killing of civets is equally appalling, but it irks me that
>alleged writers are misleading the public.

Here is a picture of a civet.

http://tinyurl.com/ytnah

-mhd
Yngver - 06 Jan 2004 16:13 GMT
>> To head off any confusion here, I just want to point out that civets are
>not
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>I think the killing of civets is equally appalling, but it irks me that
>alleged writers are misleading the public.

Exactly what I was thinking. I agree that the mass killing of civets,
especially when the evidence linking them to SARS infection is scant, is
horrible, but it should be made clearer that civets are not a kind of cat.

Of course, I also think that killing 450 calves because the investigators can't
figure out which one is the calf of the cow that was found to be infected with
mad cow disease is horrible too.
tigressnospam@gtf.org - 06 Jan 2004 17:15 GMT
> Of course, I also think that killing 450 calves because the investigators can't
> figure out which one is the calf of the cow that was found to be infected with
> mad cow disease is horrible too.

But at least with the calves you are not killing off a wild animal in
hopes of making it extinct.

Alice

Signature

The root cause of problems is simple overpopulation.  People just aren't
worth very much any more, and they know it.  Makes 'em testy. ...Bev
   |\    _,,,---,,_          Tigress
  /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_     http://havoc.gtf.gatech.edu/tigress
 |,4-  ) )-,_..;\ (  `'-'    tigressnospam@gtf.org
'---''(_/--'  `-'\_)         Cat by Felix Lee.

Yngver - 06 Jan 2004 19:06 GMT
>> Of course, I also think that killing 450 calves because the investigators
>can't
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>But at least with the calves you are not killing off a wild animal in
>hopes of making it extinct.

Good point.
MacCandace - 07 Jan 2004 02:06 GMT
<< >But at least with the calves you are not killing off a wild animal in
>hopes of making it extinct.

Good point. >>

True, but they all feel pain and fear and want to live, wild or not.  I kept
thinking about the cows all day, how sad.  I suppose most of them would have
been slaughtered for meat anyway but I (as a vegetarian) don't like that either
but this seems worse.  Poor things.  I imagine they will be killed more cruelly
than usual since there are so many to do at once.  Same with the civets;
they're not going to kill them humanely in a place like China.

Candace
(take the litter out before replying by e-mail)

See my cats:
http://photos.yahoo.com/maccandace

"One does not meet oneself until one catches the reflection from an eye other
than human."  (Loren Eisely)
Sherry - 07 Jan 2004 03:53 GMT
>True, but they all feel pain and fear and want to live, wild or not.  I kept
>thinking about the cows all day, how sad.  I suppose most of them would have
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>Candace

That's what I am concerned about. Every animal, I don't care if you eat cows,
horses, dogs or cats, deserves a humane life and a humane death. It makes me
sick to imagine how these 10,000 civet cats are going to be killed.
In a nearby town, the  animal control was trapping skunks and drowning them
while still in the trap. I threw the biggest fit and called in an abuse team to
investigate, and even though we had *no* jurisdiction to do so, it was enough
of a bluff they stopped it. I couldn't stand to think about the terror those
animals were feeling. Even if they were just skunks.

Sherry
MacCandace - 07 Jan 2004 05:20 GMT
<< I couldn't stand to think about the terror those
animals were feeling. Even if they were just skunks.

Sherry >>

Maybe if we all pray or send positive thoughts that their deaths will be
peaceful...the civet cats and the cows.  There's something to be said for the
collective consciousness...hokey as it may sound, it can't hurt to wish them
well as they die.

Candace
(take the litter out before replying by e-mail)

See my cats:
http://photos.yahoo.com/maccandace

"One does not meet oneself until one catches the reflection from an eye other
than human."  (Loren Eisely)
Sherry - 07 Jan 2004 13:30 GMT
><< I couldn't stand to think about the terror those
>animals were feeling. Even if they were just skunks.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>Candace

Absolutely, and it's not hokey at all. That's what I'm doing. Thanks Candace.
This really bothers me, probably more than it even should, given the fact that
I can't do anything more about it.
Sherry
hamandcheese@betweentheknees.com - 07 Jan 2004 06:59 GMT
>>True, but they all feel pain and fear and want to live, wild or not.  I kept
>>thinking about the cows all day, how sad.  I suppose most of them would have
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
>Sherry

I read that the civets are being killed by drowning them in
disinfectant.

Incredibly cruel.

-mhd
-L. - 07 Jan 2004 09:01 GMT
> << >But at least with the calves you are not killing off a wild animal in
> >hopes of making it extinct.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> but this seems worse.  Poor things.  I imagine they will be killed more cruelly
> than usual since there are so many to do at once.  

Cows are already slaughterd at an alarming rate - one about every 3-6
seconds in each slaughter line.  I don't think they *could* speed it
up if they had to.

-L.
-L. - 07 Jan 2004 09:01 GMT
> << >But at least with the calves you are not killing off a wild animal in
> >hopes of making it extinct.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> but this seems worse.  Poor things.  I imagine they will be killed more cruelly
> than usual since there are so many to do at once.  

Cows are already slaughterd at an alarming rate - one about every 3-6
seconds in each slaughter line.  I don't think they *could* speed it
up if they had to.

-L.
Yngver - 07 Jan 2004 16:26 GMT
> Same with the civets;
>they're not going to kill them humanely in a place like China.

What I don't understand about the civets, even putting aside that the link
between the coronavirus in civets and SARS has not even been confirmed, is why
they can't just stop eating them rather than killing them. Are these civets
being raised for food rather than animals in the wild?
MacCandace - 08 Jan 2004 01:55 GMT
<< What I don't understand about the civets, even putting aside that the link
between the coronavirus in civets and SARS has not even been confirmed, is why
they can't just stop eating them rather than killing them. Are these civets
being raised for food rather than animals in the wild? >>

Perhaps I'll be flamed for this but my significant other goes to India now and
then on business and he likes it there.  On the other hand, his boss goes to
China for business sometimes and has told Tony that it's very strange
there...he never sees any animals wandering around (India being the far extreme
where there are animals and people everywhere) and never hears or sees any
birds.  I guess we can draw whatever conclusions we want from that.  He has
also reported that when his hosts take him out to dinner, they eat things he
finds exceedingly disgusting such as sheep eyeballs.  Tony is hoping he never
has to take over the China route and can just stick with India.  He said the
animals roaming the streets actually look better than a lot of the people.
They seem to be well fed, even the stray dogs that are everywhere (this is in
Mumbai, formerly Bombay).

My point being that I suppose if the civet cats are not fit to eat that they
would consider there is no point in them existing at all.

Candace
(take the litter out before replying by e-mail)

See my cats:
http://photos.yahoo.com/maccandace

"One does not meet oneself until one catches the reflection from an eye other
than human."  (Loren Eisely)
Yngver - 08 Jan 2004 17:08 GMT
>My point being that I suppose if the civet cats are not fit to eat that they
>would consider there is no point in them existing at all.

I see. That does help explain the situation, even though people from other
cultures disagree with their reasoning.
frlpwr - 08 Jan 2004 16:30 GMT
> << >But at least with the calves you are not killing off a wild animal in
> >hopes of making it extinct.
> >
> Good point. >>
>
> True, but they all feel pain and fear and want to live, wild or not.  

Right.  An animal has no concept of itself as "threatened", "endangered"
or "food animal".  The labels are human artifice.  We designate value to
animals only when we have driven or are about to drive them to
extinction.

Whether steer, civet, orangantan or human, we all die the only way we
can, one by one.
tigressnospam@gtf.org - 08 Jan 2004 16:55 GMT
> Right.  An animal has no concept of itself as "threatened", "endangered"
> or "food animal".  The labels are human artifice.  We designate value to
> animals only when we have driven or are about to drive them to
> extinction.

I'm sorry, but one has to eat. Sometimes animals die to feed other animals
(including humans). Yes, I consider this a better death because it at
least serves a purpose of keeping another animal alive or even happy.
Killing just to make an animal extinct on the other hand is a deatht that
should not happen.

Alice

Signature

The root cause of problems is simple overpopulation.  People just aren't
worth very much any more, and they know it.  Makes 'em testy. ...Bev
   |\    _,,,---,,_          Tigress
  /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_     http://havoc.gtf.gatech.edu/tigress
 |,4-  ) )-,_..;\ (  `'-'    tigressnospam@gtf.org
'---''(_/--'  `-'\_)         Cat by Felix Lee.

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.