Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / Health and Behavior / November 2003

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

My PETA Thread (New Responses) Are Gone.

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Luvskats00 - 28 Nov 2003 07:25 GMT
I changed the PETA thread to more accurately reflect the support of the radical
(criminal) underground.  My responses did not make the newsgroup. Do you think
they were censored?
Instant Karma - 28 Nov 2003 11:50 GMT
>I changed the PETA thread to more accurately reflect the support of the radical
>(criminal) underground.  My responses did not make the newsgroup. Do you think
>they were censored?

Yeah, I'm sure they were. It was probably done from that remote internet
connection in that black helicopter hovering over your flat.....
MacCandace - 28 Nov 2003 18:14 GMT
<< I changed the PETA thread to more accurately reflect the support of the
radical
(criminal) underground.  My responses did not make the newsgroup. Do you think
they were censored? >>

By whom?  This is an unmoderated newsgroup.  I doubt if anyone really much
cares what we discuss about PETA on here.

Candace
(take the litter out before replying by e-mail)

See my cats:
http://photos.yahoo.com/maccandace

"One does not meet oneself until one catches the reflection from an eye other
than human."  (Loren Eisely)
Alison - 28 Nov 2003 19:25 GMT
--Links to animal  information websites
http://mysite.freeserve.com/petinfolinks/
> I changed the PETA thread to more accurately reflect the support of the radical
> (criminal) underground.  My responses did not make the newsgroup. Do you think
> they were censored?

Hi ,
It happens sometimes when the threads get very long .
alison
Luvskats00 - 28 Nov 2003 20:11 GMT
alison@@XallofusX2.fsnet.co.uk
writes

>It happens sometimes when the >threads get very long .

It was a long <sigh>.
Alison - 29 Nov 2003 20:51 GMT
> alison@@XallofusX2.fsnet.co.uk
> writes
>
> >It happens sometimes when the >threads get very long .
>
> It was a long <sigh>.

 LOL I've been in ones that are hundreds long on the dog groups,
lasting more than a month.   I wonder what the longest thread ever is
?
Alison
hamandcheese@betweentheknees.com - 29 Nov 2003 21:37 GMT
>> >It happens sometimes when the >threads get very long .

Never heard of that before but server retention (lack off) is a well
known problem with many ISPs. Some are good for news and others drop
threads regularly like my cable ISP does (grrrrr).

-mhd
Cathy Friedmann - 28 Nov 2003 20:24 GMT
> I changed the PETA thread to more accurately reflect the support of the radical
> (criminal) underground.  My responses did not make the newsgroup. Do you think
> they were censored?

Censored by whom?  This ng is not moderated.  The only reasons that they may
not have made it - that I know of (there may well be others - I'm not
exactly talented in the technology dep't.) - is that a server goofed up, you
thought you sent them but didn't, you accidentally e-mailed them instead of
posted them, or you cancelled them - which I assume you didn't.

Cathy

--
"Staccato signals of constant information..."
("The Boy in the Bubble")  Paul Simon
Dennis Carr - 29 Nov 2003 03:49 GMT
> I changed the PETA thread to more accurately reflect the support of the
> radical (criminal) underground.  My responses did not make the
> newsgroup. Do you think they were censored?

Unlikely.  There are known to be forged cancels, but I've only heard of
those where the newsgroup is a constant pit of flames (IE, anything in
comp.* that ends in "advocacy" or unmoderated religious newsgroups).

Signature

Dennis Carr - ke6isf@spamcop.net    | I may be out of my mind,
http://www.dennis.furtopia.org      | But I have more fun that way.
------------------------------------+-------------------------------

rrb_091903 - 29 Nov 2003 19:38 GMT
> I changed the PETA thread to more accurately reflect the support of the radical
> (criminal) underground.  My responses did not make the newsgroup. Do you think
> they were censored?

It is possible that the posts were canceled via a forged cancel. But I
doubt it. You are posting through AOL it seems. I would bet that AOl's
server rejected the posts. I have heard of AOL's servers dropping posts
in the past. Though since AOL is involved it is possible that they did
censor the posts depending on the content.
Alison - 29 Nov 2003 20:55 GMT
> It is possible that the posts were canceled via a forged cancel. But I
> doubt it. You are posting through AOL it seems. I would bet that AOl's
> server rejected the posts. I have heard of AOL's servers dropping posts
> in the past. Though since AOL is involved it is possible that they did
> censor the posts depending on the content.

 As far as I know, cancelled posts can still be read on Google .
Sometimes its easy to click  Reply instead of Group reply or more
embarrassingly sending a private Reply instead of Group Reply<G>
 Alison
Luvskats00 - 29 Nov 2003 23:09 GMT
rrb_091903@cox.net writes
>It is possible that the posts were >canceled via a forged cancel. But I
>doubt it. You are posting through >AOL it seems. I would bet that >AOl's
server rejected the posts...

It figures..I responded w/a long summary of the history of the terrorism
support..Oh well.

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.