> > > "Howard C. Berkowitz" <hcb@gettcomm.com> wrote in message
m.
> Well, there are lots of times when my heart skips beats - sometimes to
> the
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> monitor* wouldn't show a thing. I thought the nuclear stress test and
> echocardiogram would have showed something if there was a problem!
I found a veterinary site with a pretty good description:
http://www.lbah.com/heart/heartfindings.htm
Understand that ECG interpretation is an art, although we now have
pretty good computer interpretation. At one point, I was developing an
ECG simulator to test my understanding; this was at the Office of
Computer Assisted Education at George Washington Medical School. Yes, I
produced the basic patterns.
My mentor, an MD-PhD type, took me to the ICU, pointed at a heart
monitor, and said: "Tell me what's wrong." I looked at it for a while
and said "Can the monitor be broken?"
The real-world difficulty in interpreting ECGs is that the textbooks
deal with one abnormality at a time, but it's common to have multiple
abnormalities superimposed on the display. I'm out of practice -- and
it takes a lot -- to read complex ones.
> * Funny this is the first time I'd seen the name written - I'd only heard
> it
> before and I thought people were saying "halter" monitor since you wear
> it
> like a halter! ;>
No, I'm afraid it doesn't quite make it as that fashion accessory --
unless you consider five or so electrodes on the chest as sort of like a
chainmail bra. The monitor itself is about the size of a Walkman, and
people either use a shoulder strap or attach it to their belts so it
hangs at waist level. There's enough cable so that you just stick it
under your pillow.