Cat Forum / Cat Anecdotes / June 2005
I'm with Bob...maybe
|
|
Thread rating:  |
JBHajos - 25 Jun 2005 14:30 GMT I did the same thing Bob did. I got ticked off at some rancorous posts and, after over seven years with the Group, I quit. It lasted about 6 - 8 weeks. Like Bob, I checked in again a week or so ago, only to find even more horrendous viciousness going on. I've read every post and I find this morning that it still hasn't abated much.
Bob, apparently, decided to quit the Group permanently. That was my first inclination as well. I wouldn't be missed anyway so it wouldn't matter. OTOH, cooler/saner heads may/will prevail eventually. Good luck to *every*body. Soothing purrs sent to one and all.
Jeanne
Victor Martinez - 25 Jun 2005 14:52 GMT > first inclination as well. I wouldn't be missed anyway so it wouldn't > matter. OTOH, cooler/saner heads may/will prevail eventually. Good What makes you think you wouldn't be missed? I for one have always enjoyed reading you and I worried with you when Sandy was having kidney problems.
 Signature Victor M. Martinez Owned and operated by the Fantastic Seven (TM) Send your spam here: uce@ftc.gov Email me here: pistorLITTER@BOXaustin.rr.com
sriddles@aol.com - 25 Jun 2005 16:31 GMT > I did the same thing Bob did. I got ticked off at some rancorous > posts and, after over seven years with the Group, I quit. It lasted [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Jeanne Bob's leaving is the group's loss. He is a good person. I don't know him IRL, but a long time ago I posted about some trouble and he e-mailed me with a very kind, generous offer. He didn't even know me. But I suspect that's very indicative of the kind of person he is. I understand his disgust, and yours. Everybody contributes in their own way and makes a group what it is. I would miss your posts.
Sherry
Adrian - 25 Jun 2005 16:48 GMT >> I did the same thing Bob did. I got ticked off at some rancorous >> posts and, after over seven years with the Group, I quit. It lasted [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > Sherry Like you, I understand Bob's point of view, it's sad when good people feel they can't post here anymore.
 Signature Adrian (Owned by Snoopy & Bagheera) A house is not a home, without a cat.
Marina - 25 Jun 2005 16:46 GMT > I did the same thing Bob did. I got ticked off at some rancorous > posts and, after over seven years with the Group, I quit. It lasted [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > matter. OTOH, cooler/saner heads may/will prevail eventually. Good > luck to *every*body. Soothing purrs sent to one and all. I'll admit I've been thinking of leaving lately, too, but apparently I'm too stubborn. Leaving would mean that the nastiness would win. So I had a reverse reaction and started posting a lot about cats and pics and stuff. I for one would miss you, Jeanne. I'd been wondering lately where *both* our Jeannes are. Please don't leave. Too many good people have left already. That's why the nastiness is winning.
 Signature Marina, Frank and Miranda. In loving memory of Nikki. marina (dot) kurten (at) pp (dot) inet (dot) fi Pics at http://uk.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/frankiennikki/ and http://community.webshots.com/user/frankiennikki
sriddles@aol.com - 25 Jun 2005 17:38 GMT > I'll admit I've been thinking of leaving lately, too, but apparently I'm > too stubborn. Leaving would mean that the nastiness would win. You are absolutely right. I have been on groups that had a great group of core posters.Then people move in who just used it because they thought it was OK to use it as a free-for-all forum to vent whatever problems they didn't want to vent in their "regular" groups. While it wasn't utopia to begin with, it became totally unreadable and impossible to separate the good information from the recreational flame-festing. Half those core members have disappeared, and that group isn't worth reading anymore. "The nastiness won." Don't you dare leave. If you do, I will have to design a virus that attacks your computer and makes you read and post to rpca before your computer will work. NOT a small fete for an AOL user/Dell owner. Ha!! Speaking of MIA members, where is Jeanette?
Sherry
Marina - 26 Jun 2005 06:09 GMT > Don't you dare leave. If you do, I will have to design a virus that > attacks your computer and makes you read and post to rpca before your > computer will work. NOT a small fete for an AOL user/Dell owner. LOL! Sherry, I'm afraid, vey afraid. I promise not to leave (except to go to the island).
 Signature Marina, Frank and Miranda. In loving memory of Nikki. marina (dot) kurten (at) pp (dot) inet (dot) fi Pics at http://uk.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/frankiennikki/ and http://community.webshots.com/user/frankiennikki
Shiral - 27 Jun 2005 17:49 GMT Please don't leave the group, Marina! How will we be able to keep tabs up on Frank and Mir-Mir and your new Junior Partner to be!? And we'd miss YOU a lot, too!
I've personally found apca to be a excellent place to talk to friendly caring people who love cats as much as I do. I'm so happy that I found this online community. I consider the rancour of last week to be a fluke, and not the normal discourse of this group at all. I would be very sad to see any member of it leave on account of what happened last week. Granted times are tense and a lot of the members of this group have very real financial and health worries on their minds. Sometimes, tensions will out. People sometimes say things they regret. And sometimes, we just have to cut some slack for each other. The real shame would be to let an occasional verbal battle permanently ruin a good community of people who have at least one thing very much in common--our love of cats.
Melissa
Mary - 27 Jun 2005 18:18 GMT > Please don't leave the group, Marina! How will we be able to keep tabs > up on Frank and Mir-Mir and your new Junior Partner to be!? And we'd [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > Melissa Very nicely put, Melissa.
Jeanette - 27 Jun 2005 20:42 GMT > > I'll admit I've been thinking of leaving lately, too, but apparently I'm > > too stubborn. Leaving would mean that the nastiness would win. [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > Sherry I'm here hon, don't fret, just sitting on the sidelines and picking through the posts. Ripley and McCavity are happily enjoying the sunshine and hot weather we've got here at the moment.
Love
Jeanette
Hopitus - 25 Jun 2005 18:19 GMT I've been in and out (not by choice) of rpca since late '98. Bob is a cop (the ones I know tend to think in black and white). I'll miss him, too. Maybe he'll check back some day..... Here is some advice nobody asked for: for those who put their entire lives out in a cat ng don't be "shocked and awed" when someone - anonymously or not - grabs something you posted and bites your a.s w/it. For those who have problems and troubles making them testy, but yet can't bring themselves to relate these in a cat ng for all to sympathize w/and offer suggestions.....don't vent on a poster in *another country* who was not raised here and has just a general idea, as we do of their country, of how people react here (informally, relaxed USA - LOL). For the non-USA poster brought up in a more formal - yet overt - social atmosphere - illness and stress respects no nationality, and though I'm w/you supportwise through your entire ordeal, and have extreme tolerance for *you* being testy, I take any fussings from you w/salt grain because I have some pals from your land and know that when they seem vicious to me, I live and have been brought up in a far more casual manner/country than UK, so let a lot roll off my back, so to speak, offense-wise. Plus, you ain't feelin' good. Sidebar to poster defending one who needs no defense: (you fit category two above) - this is upclose and personal: years ago you posted something that made me believe you are a member of a large religious group from whom I have many pals and though I am a Christian of another faith, have learned many of their tenets and beliefs and respect all, even those outsiders pick on because they're so different....these pals have (some are renegades and in bad standing w/church authorities) found good advice and peace of mind from their Elders in authority, once they brought themselves around to seeking such. Whatever your problems, - if you are what I think you are - could you find help from this source? I know it's NOMB but hey....all kinds of stuff is hanging out here lately; just trying to offer helpful advice. Last word for those who think things are bad in rpca: go lurk for a few days over @ rpch&B, read all posts there, and rethink..quote Nazareth: "You got another think comin'".......(60's heavymetal band, young folks)..
>> I did the same thing Bob did. I got ticked off at some rancorous >> posts and, after over seven years with the Group, I quit. It lasted [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > our Jeannes are. Please don't leave. Too many good people have left > already. That's why the nastiness is winning. Gracecat - 25 Jun 2005 18:31 GMT *snipped*
> Last word for those who think things are bad in rpca: go > lurk for a few days over @ rpch&B, read all posts there, > and rethink..quote Nazareth: "You got another think comin'".......(60's > heavymetal band, young folks).. Oh good lord, I just did...
It's frightening and a little disconcerting reading some of our posters posts from there.
Grace
Enfilade - 25 Jun 2005 22:49 GMT I'm actually surprised at how little unpleasantness is on this board, considering it isn't actively moderated.
I spent yesterday cleaning flames and other junk out of a message board where I'm a moderator, and dishing out warnings...
...I am /so/ not doing that here.
--Fil just stayin' out of it
sriddles@aol.com - 25 Jun 2005 23:05 GMT > I'm actually surprised at how little unpleasantness is on this board, > considering it isn't actively moderated. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > --Fil Whoa. What a task. In some groups, that would be a forty-hour job. ;-)
Sherry
Howard C. Berkowitz - 25 Jun 2005 23:44 GMT > I've been in and out (not by choice) of rpca since late '98. Bob is a cop > (the ones I know tend to think in black and white). I'll miss him, too. [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > so let a lot roll off my back, so to speak, offense-wise. Plus, you ain't > feelin' good. I'm not sure where I should have trimmed, but I was amazed by rpch+b, and got out of it as soon as possible. I've plonked a number of cross-posters, as what I consider arrogant fools that mislead other people.
That's a strong statement, and I should explain. There are some people that have a substantial amount of experience with the treatment of various feline diseases. Many of them, however, don't understand the underlying clinical science, and will attack someone that questions their approach based on -- I hate to say theoretical -- medical science(?) grounds. I remember one that went off on a particular laboratory test, and I suggested an alternative that involved sticking the cat one less time and, for very specific reasons, was considerably more accurate.
That individual started as condescending and escalated to threatening. I don't threaten easily, but I soon realized this person's ignorance was impregnable, and they reveled in their incorrect "knowledge".
I believe that I have been able to do a reasonable job here is explaining the principles behind various tests, treatments, and diseases, although there are times where I have to say "How work? Much big magic. Spirits make happen. You try without training, spirits make you a toad."
My professional background is in, among other things, clinical engineering. I am not a physician or veterinarian, but I sometimes joke that I simulate them on computers. In other words, I develop systems that capture the expertise of top clincians, and also that include various physiologic sensors, microbiological diagnostics, etc. To be able to function with that, I have to spend as much time keeping up with such things as molecular pharmacology as physical diagnosis and treatment.
I hope I've never been guilty of responding "because I said so." There may have been times where I've said "here's a general explanation. To go beyond that, you are going to have to understand a lot of theory. Here are several respected textbooks or sites on that aspect of theory. Go read them, and if you still have questions, I'd be happy to discuss them."
CatNipped - 26 Jun 2005 00:41 GMT > > I've been in and out (not by choice) of rpca since late '98. Bob is a cop > > (the ones I know tend to think in black and white). I'll miss him, too. [quoted text clipped - 62 lines] > read them, and if you still have questions, I'd be happy to discuss > them." I know what you mean, Howard. Unfortunately, some people see a lot of technical jargon (that was probably copied and pasted) and think someone is an expert (and may take advise from that "expert" that might ultimately harm their cat!)
I read someone write "you might want to give your cat a regimen of antibiotics just in case". ACK! You don't know how glad I was to hear my vet say Thursday, "I want to hold off on giving Jessie any antibiotics until her labs come back". *After* her labs were back on Friday I went and picked up her medicine. [Researchers are finding out now that even using antibiotic soap is starting to cause problems with antibiotic-resistant bacteria FGS!]
People need to realize just how hazardous and far-reaching taking bad advice can be! I'm always glad to read what you have to say about a drug or health condition, not only for the information you give, but for the explanations you add - it makes it a lot easier to figure out *why* what you're saying is something I should take into consideration!
Hugs,
CatNipped
sriddles@aol.com - 26 Jun 2005 01:04 GMT > That's a strong statement, and I should explain. There are some people > that have a substantial amount of experience with the treatment of [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > the cat one less time and, for very specific reasons, was considerably > more accurate. I always appreciate your posts, and others too that are very knowledgeable on cat behavior/health. But I would never, no way, take any information off a newsgroup and apply it in real life, without discussing with a vet, or in the case of behavioral issues, just applying some good common sense. Newsgroup info. is, to me, a place to take in enough information for me to use as a tool to research further on my own; ideas if you will. Even the small stuff always needs to be thought through. Someone once suggested putting litterboxes in garages, to eliminate the mess and smell. Then their own cat ended up accidentally poisoned. You can't take anybody's word as gospel to apply to your own situation.
Sherry
> That individual started as condescending and escalated to threatening. I > don't threaten easily, but I soon realized this person's ignorance was [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > read them, and if you still have questions, I'd be happy to discuss > them." CatNipped - 26 Jun 2005 02:07 GMT > > That's a strong statement, and I should explain. There are some people > > that have a substantial amount of experience with the treatment of [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > accidentally poisoned. You can't take anybody's word as gospel to apply > to your own situation. Nope, I believe it turned out that cat had an infection and needed antibiotics - not poisoned. ;>
Hugs,
CatNipped
> Sherry > > [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > > read them, and if you still have questions, I'd be happy to discuss > > them." sriddles@aol.com - 26 Jun 2005 02:18 GMT > > > That's a strong statement, and I should explain. There are some people > > > that have a substantial amount of experience with the treatment of [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > > CatNipped Guess antibiotics aren't the devil, after all. :->
Sherry
Howard C. Berkowitz - 26 Jun 2005 02:54 GMT > > > > That's a strong statement, and I should explain. There are some > > > > people [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] > > Guess antibiotics aren't the devil, after all. :-> Antibiotics revolutionized medicine, and are still some of the most valuable of all drugs. My first original research problem was on a means of overcoming bacterial resistance to penicillins.
I think it's fair to say that I have a fairly thorough knowledge of antibiotics. While I will admit that at one period of low funds, I did check the local Petco to see if they had an appropriate antibiotic for fish that I could take, you'll find I am much more in favor of keeping antibiotics on prescription than I am opioids or cannabinoids.
The latter two are "drugs of abuse" that rarely induce aggression -- I am quite opposed to decriminalizing amphetamines and related stimulant amines, dissociative anesthetics such as phencyclidine (PCP) and ketamine, and anabolic steroids. All of these can induce extreme aggression, often simultaneously suppressing pain.
I go reasonably ballistic when I see antibiotics used as agricultural growth supplements. Recently, it was discovered that the Chinese had used amantadine widely in their chicken farming -- rendering one of the relatively few antiviral drugs useless against bird flu.
So I am all in favor of informed, responsible use of antibiotics, and all against people who don't know all the consequences of using them. For example, it's generally bad practice to give a "shotgun" mixture of antibiotics when you don't have a firm diagnosis -- and absolutely appropriate when there is an overwhelming, life-threatening infection such as Harri Roadcat appeared to have.
sriddles@aol.com - 26 Jun 2005 03:22 GMT > > > > > That's a strong statement, and I should explain. There are some > > > > > people [quoted text clipped - 62 lines] > appropriate when there is an overwhelming, life-threatening infection > such as Harri Roadcat appeared to have. Are veterinary-grade antibiotics even available to the public w/out a prescription? (besides cow penicillin; I know that's available). I mean, Baytril, ceflex, the ones often prescribed for cats. I am also vehemently opposed to anybody doling out antibiotics to animals/people without a diagnosis, for the record. But besides life-threatening infectsion, without antibiotics, think how many minor problems would turn major without vet's ability to provide them. I don't get the hoopla about opiods, really. But I had cluster migraines for years and preferred the old-fashioned opiods to whatever new wonder zonker came out. And it turned out many of the new wonder zonkers were far more dangerous. Your story about the Chinese reminds me of a conversation with someone who works at a feed mill. He said we would all be nervous if we knew all the "medications" that went into cattle feed. Antibiotics? I hope not. BTW, what do you know about Leviquin, speaking of antibiotics. You can e-mail me off-list if you like. Besides costing $12 per dose, the informational brochre is a little creepy.
Sherry
Howard C. Berkowitz - 27 Jun 2005 02:15 GMT > Are veterinary-grade antibiotics even available to the public w/out a > prescription? (besides cow penicillin; I know that's available). For official cat use, no. I have been surprised, however, how many are available in pet stores for use with tropical fish. Unfortunately, when I had what was pretty clearly cellulitis in my leg, and really didn't want to spend $800-1000 to be told that (admittedly ruling out some dangerous alternatives about which I would take an informed risk).
> I mean, Baytril, ceflex, the ones often prescribed for cats. I am also > vehemently opposed to anybody doling out antibiotics to animals/people [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > new wonder zonker came out. And it turned out many of the new wonder > zonkers were far more dangerous. From a "recreational" standpoint, I don't have much problem with decriminalizing drugs, such as opioids and cannabinoids, that are rarely associated with aggressive behavior. Amphetamines, PCP, and others that cause aggressive behavior is another matter.
Long-term opioid use is generally accepted as appropriate in some non-terminal patients. Use of opioids in headache sometimes is appropriate, and sometimes can worsen the situation. Generally, their use has to be individualized by an experienced neurologist.
Cluster, as opposed to migraine, is difficult to treat. I do know several physicians that swear that many attacks can be aborted if the patient breathes 100% oxygen or a few minutes. Getting a small oxygen tank might be something to discuss with your doctor.
> Your story about the Chinese reminds me of a conversation with someone > who works at a feed mill. He said we would all be nervous if we knew > all the "medications" that went into cattle feed. Antibiotics? I hope > not. There is MASSIVE use of antibiotics in animal feed, with much controversy on Baytril, in particular, in poultry feed. I am appalled by the practice.
> BTW, what do you know about Leviquin, speaking of antibiotics. You can > e-mail me off-list if you like. Besides costing $12 per dose, the > informational brochre is a little creepy. It's a member of the fluoroquinolone class of antibiotics, the first of which was ciprofloxacin (Cipro). Levofloxacin (Levaquin) is what might be loosely called a second-generation ciprofloxacin, along with gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin. These do demonstrate better effectiveness in some diseases, such as community-acquired pneumonia, but in other conditions, seem to be comparable to the older, now-generic fluoroquinolones. I didn't see, in a quick database search, a side effect profile for levofloxacin that seemed significantly different than other fluoroquinolones.
Feel free to email if there are specific questions.
Hopitus - 27 Jun 2005 02:45 GMT Antibiotics put in cattle feed is why many have turned to consuming organic meat these days. Since it's mega expensive, I just dropped down to tiny portions of beef once in a long while....and eat so much chicken I expect to let out a "caw" any time. Since the antibiotics also go into the cow's milk, and it's just a little more, expense-wise, I have been drinking organic fat-free milk (I hate milk but you gotta go w/it on cold cereal!). Learned something here from good ole Howard - I didn't know chickens were getting antibiotics too! It's enough (well, not quite) to morph me into a vegetarian....LOL. Don't feel like the Lone Ranger 'cause you didn't know about the antibiotics, Sherry....the only reason I knew is because my DIL works in Boulder @ home base of Wild Oats Foods (organic to the max).
>> Are veterinary-grade antibiotics even available to the public w/out a >> prescription? (besides cow penicillin; I know that's available). [quoted text clipped - 54 lines] > > Feel free to email if there are specific questions. Karen - 27 Jun 2005 02:51 GMT > Antibiotics put in cattle feed is why many have turned to consuming organic > meat these days. Since it's mega expensive, I just dropped down to tiny [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > antibiotics, Sherry....the only reason I knew is because my DIL works in > Boulder @ home base of Wild Oats Foods (organic to the max). You know what is amazing about organic milk? It LASTS. I could never buy a half gallon without it going bad in a week. I can get a half gallon of organic with a three week out "use by" date. Gives me plenty of time. I don't know what the difference is, but I sure like it.
Biskybabe - 27 Jun 2005 03:06 GMT >> Antibiotics put in cattle feed is why many have turned to consuming organic >> meat these days. Since it's mega expensive, I just dropped down to tiny [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > organic with a three week out "use by" date. Gives me plenty of time. I > don't know what the difference is, but I sure like it. And it tastes so much better!
I have to admit, when I'm feeling cheap I buy the non-organic milk from the organic farm. I'm trusting the farm but I believe that the non-organic milk is from cows that were treated with anti-biotics for a specific condition. After they've had anti-biotics for any reason they can't go back into the organic herd. But the management, feed and everything is the same.
bisky
Monique Y. Mudama - 27 Jun 2005 03:09 GMT > You know what is amazing about organic milk? It LASTS. I could never > buy a half gallon without it going bad in a week. I can get a half > gallon of organic with a three week out "use by" date. Gives me > plenty of time. I don't know what the difference is, but I sure like > it. I've noticed that Horizons milk lasts for about a month.
But it's not just organic milk. We get milk delivered to our door -- guaranteed milked in the last day -- and that stuff lasts forever, too. Pretty sure it's not organic, but it also hasn't travelled around the country and then sat on a shelf for a few days.
 Signature monique, who spoils Oscar unmercifully
pictures: http://www.bounceswoosh.org/rpca
Mary - 27 Jun 2005 03:14 GMT > > You know what is amazing about organic milk? It LASTS. I could never > > buy a half gallon without it going bad in a week. I can get a half [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > too. Pretty sure it's not organic, but it also hasn't travelled > around the country and then sat on a shelf for a few days. It is the fat that makes it keep.
sriddles@aol.com - 27 Jun 2005 03:17 GMT > > > You know what is amazing about organic milk? It LASTS. I could never > > > buy a half gallon without it going bad in a week. I can get a half [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > It is the fat that makes it keep. If that's true, then why does skim milk last so much longer than whole? DH drinks whole, I drink skim. "His" milk always goes bad faster than mine does.
Sherry
Mary - 27 Jun 2005 03:54 GMT > > > > You know what is amazing about organic milk? It LASTS. I could never > > > > buy a half gallon without it going bad in a week. I can get a half [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > DH drinks whole, I drink skim. "His" milk always goes bad faster than > mine does. Now, see, in my experience, whole milk lasted way longer than 2%. When I looked into why, I was told that fat preserves things. Like the reason you don't really have to refrigerate butter or cheese. (I don't leave the butter out but my Mama sure did.)
Anyone else know anything?
Monique Y. Mudama - 27 Jun 2005 03:28 GMT >> But it's not just organic milk. We get milk delivered to our door >> -- guaranteed milked in the last day -- and that stuff lasts [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > It is the fat that makes it keep. The milk we get delivered is 1%.
 Signature monique, who spoils Oscar unmercifully
pictures: http://www.bounceswoosh.org/rpca
Mary - 27 Jun 2005 03:51 GMT > >> But it's not just organic milk. We get milk delivered to our door > >> -- guaranteed milked in the last day -- and that stuff lasts [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > The milk we get delivered is 1%. Hmm. Then I wonder what it is? I am really curious to know what might give it a longer shelf life.
Monique Y. Mudama - 27 Jun 2005 04:00 GMT >> The milk we get delivered is 1%. > > Hmm. Then I wonder what it is? I am really curious to know what > might give it a longer shelf life. Yeah; I dunno.
I'd read about more fat allowing a longer shelf life for baked goods, too (my lowfat cookbook warned that the cornbread wouldn't last as long as the stuff made with full-fat buttermilk).
 Signature monique, who spoils Oscar unmercifully
pictures: http://www.bounceswoosh.org/rpca
CatNipped - 26 Jun 2005 03:29 GMT > > > > That's a strong statement, and I should explain. There are some people > > > > that have a substantial amount of experience with the treatment of [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > > Sherry Nope, indeed not - they are literally life savers!
Hugs,
CatNipped
Hopitus - 26 Jun 2005 02:00 GMT Heh....Howard, I have greatest respect for your medical explanations (unlike those resident advisors you mention, you do *not* give "advice"....only explanations, which I for one appreciate. IMHO you are lucky to be on this earth still after all the bypass, etc. you've had. My record: only 2 angiograms/stent placements/beta therapy (to date). Hopitus admits when I am clueless about anything, and the only thing after 30 years mainly ER hospital work I'd assert being expert on is xray procedures (much more disgusting and grody than dangerous, and no one really wants to hear about them unless they're *going to have one*, for which I can't blame them). You're correct totally about the "advisors" 'tudes toward competitive knowledge, though. Many at that ng have "message-blocked" this one or that one; I've just fled even visiting it because of the infighting there...it's lost its usefulness to me. I fled to rpca several years ago when alt.cats was getting wacko...these days it seems fairly sane...ROFL. Yowie's right; rpca is more like a family...or if I may: a group of friends. As I say OIAW...it's all relative, ain't it?
>> I've been in and out (not by choice) of rpca since late '98. Bob is a cop >> (the ones I know tend to think in black and white). I'll miss him, too. [quoted text clipped - 62 lines] > read them, and if you still have questions, I'd be happy to discuss > them." Takayuki - 26 Jun 2005 04:56 GMT >I believe that I have been able to do a reasonable job here is >explaining the principles behind various tests, treatments, and >diseases, although there are times where I have to say "How work? Much >big magic. Spirits make happen. You try without training, spirits make >you a toad." Phht. This is funny! It is true that the rest of us just your everyday, normal hoomin catslaves, but what little I've understood of your explanations were very logical and enlightening, and we owe you thanks.
Mary - 26 Jun 2005 05:53 GMT > >I believe that I have been able to do a reasonable job here is > >explaining the principles behind various tests, treatments, and [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > your explanations were very logical and enlightening, and we owe you > thanks. I have always gotten a lot out of Howard's posts. He has so much good-natured patience and a great sense of humor. I look for his posts first thing!
Dan M - 26 Jun 2005 06:06 GMT > I have always gotten a lot out of Howard's posts. He has so much > good-natured patience and a great sense of humor. I look for his posts > first thing! Likewise. Through this hospital thing with Harri, hearing Howard's explanation of several medical issues has helpe me to develop a better understanding of what's going on with my baby Roadcat, and that has been making it easier to deal with the stress. I greatly appreciate Howard's input.
Dan
Susan M - 26 Jun 2005 06:27 GMT I always appreciate your information and responses Howard. Thank you for your knowledge!!!
Susan M Otis and Chester
>> I've been in and out (not by choice) of rpca since late '98. Bob is a cop >> (the ones I know tend to think in black and white). I'll miss him, too. [quoted text clipped - 62 lines] > read them, and if you still have questions, I'd be happy to discuss > them." Howard C. Berkowitz - 27 Jun 2005 02:17 GMT Thanks for all the kind input.
I might ask, however, if you know the technical term for the physician or veterinarian that graduates at the bottom of his or her class?
*spoiler space*
§
"doctor"
Debbie Wilson - 25 Jun 2005 19:13 GMT > I'll admit I've been thinking of leaving lately, too, Nooo! Please don't. :-)
> but apparently I'm too stubborn. Good :-)
Deb.
 Signature http://www.scientific-art.com
"He looked a fierce and quarrelsome cat, but claw he never would; He only bit the ones he loved, because they tasted good." S. Greenfield
SuzQ - 26 Jun 2005 00:54 GMT Marina <frankiennikki@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> I'll admit I've been thinking of leaving lately, too, Nooo! Please don't. :-)
> but apparently I'm too stubborn. Good :-)
Deb.
 Signature
====================================== 1. What Deb said, besides you MUST keep me updated on Frank & Mir-Mir. 2. I just stay out of the arguements, they usually go away. But I hate it when regulars go away mad/hurt. 3. Its usually 2 or 3 people argueing not the group. Suz
wafflycat - 25 Jun 2005 20:51 GMT > I'll admit I've been thinking of leaving lately, too, but apparently I'm > too stubborn. Leaving would mean that the nastiness would win. So I had a > reverse reaction and started posting a lot about cats and pics and stuff. > I for one would miss you, Jeanne. I'd been wondering lately where *both* > our Jeannes are. Please don't leave. Too many good people have left > already. That's why the nastiness is winning. You aren't the only one who has been thinking of dropping out of the group. I've been lurking far more than I used to do. The nastiness that has been developing in the group is obvious - and very, very sad.
helen s
Yowie - 27 Jun 2005 01:30 GMT > > I did the same thing Bob did. I got ticked off at some rancorous > > posts and, after over seven years with the Group, I quit. It lasted [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > *both* our Jeannes are. Please don't leave. Too many good people have > left already. That's why the nastiness is winning. No way are you leaving when Mere is just getting into the peak of hoolikittenness!!
Yowie
Gracecat - 27 Jun 2005 03:27 GMT >> > I did the same thing Bob did. I got ticked off at some rancorous >> > posts and, after over seven years with the Group, I quit. It lasted [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > Yowie I'm not ashamed of using Eve stories as bait ;)
Grace
Yowie - 27 Jun 2005 04:36 GMT > >> > I did the same thing Bob did. I got ticked off at some rancorous > >> > posts and, after over seven years with the Group, I quit. It lasted [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > I'm not ashamed of using Eve stories as bait ;) And nor should you be! I am amazed at just how upset I was (and still am) over the loss of Eve, and I had never met her or her Mom. The reason, I think, is because you 'shared' her with us so well that we got to know her and care about her so much that it became Real Life anyway.
Thankyou.
Yowie
Marina - 27 Jun 2005 06:15 GMT > No way are you leaving when Mere is just getting into the peak of > hoolikittenness!! 'Just getting into the peak'??? 'Just getting into the peak'????????? You mean it gets worse??? :oP
Signed Sleepless in Helsinki (Miranda thought it was a good idea to overturn flower pots and dig the dirt out of the ones she didn't overturn. A few days ago, I cut up a lime and strew bits of lime on top of the soil, but they are drying and don't smell as strongly any more. Note to self: buy more citrus fruit.)
 Signature Marina, Frank and Miranda. In loving memory of Nikki. marina (dot) kurten (at) pp (dot) inet (dot) fi Pics at http://uk.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/frankiennikki/ and http://community.webshots.com/user/frankiennikki
JBHajos - 27 Jun 2005 16:30 GMT >I'll admit I've been thinking of leaving lately, too, but apparently I'm >too stubborn. Leaving would mean that the nastiness would win. Glad you're staying. Stubborn is good!! I think I'll stay with it too - I'm not stubborn, just *nosy*. Curiosity about what's going on with the Group will keep me at least lurking. And, you know, why should I punish myself and do without all the goodies? Such as, had I not returned I wouldn't have known about Harri Roadcat's ordeal and was able to send purrs and a donation I couldn't have otherwise. The Group has been too good for too long to just take my marbles and leave. Love y'all!!!
Jeanne
Marina - 27 Jun 2005 17:32 GMT >>I'll admit I've been thinking of leaving lately, too, but apparently I'm >>too stubborn. Leaving would mean that the nastiness would win. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Group has been too good for too long to just take my marbles and > leave. Love y'all!!! Yay! Glad you decided to stick around, Jeanne! Love you too.
 Signature Marina, Frank and Miranda. In loving memory of Nikki. marina (dot) kurten (at) pp (dot) inet (dot) fi Pics at http://uk.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/frankiennikki/ and http://community.webshots.com/user/frankiennikki
Dan M - 25 Jun 2005 16:51 GMT > Bob, apparently, decided to quit the Group permanently. That was my > first inclination as well. I wouldn't be missed anyway so it wouldn't > matter. OTOH, cooler/saner heads may/will prevail eventually. Good > luck to *every*body. Soothing purrs sent to one and all. > > Jeanne Bob will be missed, and if you had decided to leave you would be missed as well. Sooner or later (please, let it be sooner!) cooler heads WILL prevail. Thanks for sticking with us.
Dan
Ted Davis - 25 Jun 2005 18:21 GMT >I did the same thing Bob did. I got ticked off at some rancorous >posts and, after over seven years with the Group, I quit. It lasted [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >matter. OTOH, cooler/saner heads may/will prevail eventually. Good >luck to *every*body. Soothing purrs sent to one and all. Curiously perhaps, but I haven't seen any of that. Or perhaps it's just that I know how to read newsgroups so as to see the good stuff and miss the bad, though sometimes I do feel left out for not even knowing about the flame wars.
usenet is a rational anarchy: there is no central authority to punish offensive users - that is up to the users themselves, individually and (better) collectively. It is possible sometimes to drive offensive users away from a group. One technique that has worked is to put a notice in your replies to some question that foo is likely to reply but should be ignored as a troll or flamer. Of course, foo then starts posting under another name, but it's generally easy enough to recognize the style (in one case, not only was the style recognizable, but the offender always posted using the same obsolete software from the same ISP in a small country - he still does, but not in *that* group).
Flamers get their kicks by riling good people up to the point where they loose control and resort to flaming themselves. Unless you are expert at toying with flamers, they are best ignored - *do not reply to flamers*. People who are targets of flamers quickly learn who they are, as do other regular readers of deep threads.
For most readers, a good rule to follow is that everything of value in a thread is probably contained in the top four levels: original question, response to question, request for clarification, and clarification - if the original posting isn't a question, that leaves only three levels. Multiple levels of messages exchanged between two or three people (with a few others jumping in to defend the one being flamed) are symptoms of a flame war and are best ignored.
A good news reader program can help by allowing you to mark threads to ignore and by automatically removing (or marking read) everything from specific users. The most useful feature is good, and configurable, message threading - without threading, it is impossible to recognize flame wars by their characteristic structure. Microsoft does not offer a news reader, and the news reader features in some of its other applications are at best rude. Google is not a news reader application. I have yet to find a decent news reader attached to any web browser - there are several very good ones available for free (Free Agent appears to be the most commonly used free one, though the commercial version (Agent) is better).
It is also often said that usenet users need to wear asbestos underwear when going on-line - that means that a thick skin - immune to insults and offenses - is a Good Thing.
 Signature T.E.D. (tdavis@gearbox.maem.umr.edu)
glsummer@neptunelink.com - 25 Jun 2005 18:27 GMT >I did the same thing Bob did. I got ticked off at some rancorous >posts and, after over seven years with the Group, I quit. It lasted [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > >Jeanne Jeanne, I for one would miss you. I hope you will reconsider and stay. It has been rare that major bickering has gone on here (only a few times I recall in 6? 7? years). It happens sometimes. But it isn't the tone and temper of the group as a whole.
Please stay and post some funny cat stories :-)
Ginger-lyn
Home Pages: http://www.spiritrealm.com/summer/ http://www.angelfire.com/folk/glsummer (homepage & cats) http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~summer/index.htm (genealogy) http://www.movieanimals.bravehost.com/ (The Violence Against Animals in Movies Website)
Christina Websell - 25 Jun 2005 20:27 GMT Please don't leave Jeanne or Bob. It's probably my fault for asking for so much support that this has all kicked off and what I said about Jill's partner's dog. This has been a bad week or two.
Tweed
>I did the same thing Bob did. I got ticked off at some rancorous > posts and, after over seven years with the Group, I quit. It lasted [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Jeanne sriddles@aol.com - 25 Jun 2005 22:41 GMT > Please don't leave Jeanne or Bob. It's probably my fault for asking for so > much support that this has all kicked off and what I said about Jill's > partner's dog. This has been a bad week or two. > > Tweed No one, NO ONE thinks you have asked for "so much support." Please don't think that way. Good grief. Seanette is only one person lashing out for reasons we probably don't even know, and I am just so sorry you got hurt in the process.
Sherry
Yowie - 27 Jun 2005 01:38 GMT > > Please don't leave Jeanne or Bob. It's probably my fault for asking for so > > much support that this has all kicked off and what I said about Jill's [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > out for reasons we probably don't even know, and I am just so sorry you > got hurt in the process. I don't think Seanette (or for that matter any poster in the flame threads) meant to start a flame war. I think perhaps words were chosen poorly, and with all the sadness, grief and worry this group has endured, as individuals and as a group, that it just boiled over. Even in the most loving families, that happens occasionally when everyone is at the end of their tether. The good thing about families, though, is that after the flames are out, and the ashes cleaned away, they forgive each other and get on with living, laughing and loving again.
Yowie
Karen - 26 Jun 2005 00:18 GMT > Please don't leave Jeanne or Bob. It's probably my fault for asking for so > much support that this has all kicked off and what I said about Jill's > partner's dog. This has been a bad week or two. > > Tweed Tweed, that is just NOT so. It has nothing to do with your needing us. Please do not think that. This just makes me so upset if you think that because it is patently UNtrue.
Mary - 26 Jun 2005 03:39 GMT > Please don't leave Jeanne or Bob. It's probably my fault for asking for so > much support that this has all kicked off and what I said about Jill's > partner's dog. This has been a bad week or two. > > Tweed How can anyone demand and expect that people are not going to have bad days and have arguments?
I see those who INSIST that everything be constantly smooth sailing as bullies, plain and simple. Life is not like that. People are not like that. Interacting honestly is not like that.
And who wants dishonesty?
Shall we always make nice-nice in the group and say what we really mean to our spouses or to one another in email?
How dreadful and depressing. How terribly hypocritical and deeply dishonest.
I think the "wounded" need to grow up and stop trying to control people in such a way that it is always Disneyland around here.
That said, PLEASE KILLFILE ME!!!!!
Bleah. I think the only thing worse than a moderated group is someone who is willing to do the job, Enfilade. Why bother to interact at all if you cannot be honest?
JBHajos - 27 Jun 2005 16:54 GMT >I see those who INSIST that everything be constantly smooth >sailing as bullies, plain and simple. Guess I'm just a cotton-pickin' bully then :) Though I don't "insist", I do expect a modicum of civility from *this* Group. Honesty has nothing to do with it, common courtesy does. No, I don't expect everything to be 100% sweetsie-poo but brutal honesty can be tempered. And usually is.
>I think the "wounded" need to grow up and stop trying >to control people in such a way that it is always Disneyland >around here. But Disneyland is a lot of fun!!! Nah, I don't think I'll grow up; too much fun to try to "control" (???) people :) I like the RPCA of old - - if nastiness is "progress" I've missed something in the translation.
>That said, PLEASE KILLFILE ME!!!!! OKAY.
Jeanne
Mary - 27 Jun 2005 18:21 GMT > >I see those who INSIST that everything be constantly smooth > >sailing as bullies, plain and simple. [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > Jeanne That was easy. :) I love authoritarian personalities!
Christina Websell - 29 Jun 2005 00:31 GMT >> >I see those who INSIST that everything be constantly smooth >> >sailing as bullies, plain and simple. [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > That was easy. :) I love authoritarian personalities! Mary, you are starting to bring your ach&b persona here. Please don't.
Tweed
Mary - 29 Jun 2005 16:47 GMT > >> >I see those who INSIST that everything be constantly smooth > >> >sailing as bullies, plain and simple. [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > > Tweed What an odd request. I have no idea how to comply with it. I am the same person here as I am there. When someone posts horse sh.t here I call it horse sh.t. Why on earth would anyone assume otherwise?
I will continue to speak out against those who would reduce whole human beings into little phony spouters of "nice nice."
There is a deeply hyocritical element here--it is like the elephant in the middle of the room that everyone can see but nobody had better mention. It amuses me. Your false sense of control also amuses me, but many of you are so fragile, I would not dream of doing anything to shake it.
That said, I hope you're feeling well and well on the mend.
:) CatNipped - 29 Jun 2005 17:24 GMT > > >> >I see those who INSIST that everything be constantly smooth > > >> >sailing as bullies, plain and simple. [quoted text clipped - 42 lines] > That said, I hope you're feeling well and well on the mend. > :) What I would hope of this group is that people will speak their minds, and the truth, but do so without attacking a person (e.g. attack the argument, not the person making the argument). I think that can be done in a civil manner, and I think that, for the most part, we are able to do it here. This is the *ONLY* group I've ever seen that can have a 100+ post thread on politics, where everyone was arguing their own point of view, without anyone using a mean word to an "opponent" - incredible! You don't have to compromise your honesty or integrity in order to be "nice".
I know I've taken some flak for not being as polite in rpch+b as I am here. But, in my defense, that was only after I had been (viciously) attacked, cursed at, got a foul-languaged message on my cell phone, nasty threatening emails, and was accused of committing a felony. My frustration at all this while *I* was trying to be nice caused me to strike back in kind (not an excuse, just an explanation). Before that, I posted the same way there as I do here. Being a bit more "shoot from the hip" is just the tone of that group, and several members from here have "dropped the "F" bomb" over there for quite some time before I even started posting there. There's absolutely nothing wrong with that, in fact most groups are like that. But that's *not* the tone of this group.
Different strokes for different folks. I'm not going to say either one is better than the other, like government, people get the newsgroup they want by how they act.
Hugs,
CatNipped
Mary - 29 Jun 2005 17:36 GMT > I know I've taken some flak for not being as polite in rpch+b as I am here. Here's the rub: the critics tell you that you must adhere to certain "standards of civility" here, and you do. Then when you go elsewhere to express yourself more fully, they say "you only use this group as a place to say &#@@&$!"
When, in fact, they ought to be happy that you are willing to comply with their wishes here. Because all compliance is done willingly. I generally comply because I have no reason not to, and why should I want to upset such nice people? :) And I mean that.
Just as I say that if you can dish it out but can't take it, "hand in your spoon," it is also true that if you don't dish it out you won't be getting any from me.
Very simple.
CatNipped - 29 Jun 2005 17:39 GMT > > I know I've taken some flak for not being as polite in rpch+b as I am > here. [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > Very simple. You're exactly right! It's just like I say when I talk about parenting - people will live up to your expectations of them (and also tend to treat you the way you treat them).
Hugs,
CatNipped
Enfilade - 29 Jun 2005 20:10 GMT Mary: you said *quote* Bleah. I think the only thing worse than a moderated group is someone who is willing to do the job, Enfilade. Why bother to interact at all if you cannot be honest? *end quote*
Here is my reply:
Because you can say you don't agree with someone in two ways:
1. I don't agree with you. 2. **** you, ****face--obviously you are a retarded moron.
Which is more pleasant to read? Which is more appropriate for a board used by children as well as adults? Which encourages intelligent conversation and debate, and which degenerates quickly into insults and name-calling?
How will we hold the Allspark board to the "Family" rating we tell parents it has, so that they will continue to allow their children to go there, without moderating?
That is why I moderate it.
Now, a group like this isn't pitched as a "Family" or "appropriate for children" board. We're mostly adults here, to my knowledge, and the odd swear word might not be such a big deal. Look at the newsgroups as a whole though--how many of them are made up of spam, advertisements, and trolling?
As for the "Expressing oneself honestly," there are some forms of "honest" expression not suited to certain situations, ie, at work, in front of your family, or in conversation open to the general public as this one is. I don't think it's "dishonest" of me to phrase my displeasure as,
"I do not approve of your actions in this situation"
as opposed to
"F!ck off and die, d!ckweed."
--Fil
Magic Mood Jeep© - 29 Jun 2005 20:25 GMT > Mary: you said *quote* Bleah. I think the only thing worse than a > moderated [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] > > --Fil Which is precicely why MaryS, among others, were added to my <plonk> list ages ago. They might be knowledgable in regards to cats, but the lanuage they use (and the way they attack others when said other's simply disagree with them) wasn't worth it.
 Signature The ONE and ONLY lefthanded-pathetic-paranoid-psychotic-sarcastic-wiseass-ditzy former-blonde in Bloomington! (And proud of it, too)© email me at nalee1964 (at) insightbb (dot) com http://community.webshots.com/user/mgcmdjeep
Pamela Shirk - 25 Jun 2005 22:40 GMT >I did the same thing Bob did. I got ticked off at some rancorous > posts and, after over seven years with the Group, I quit. It lasted [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > matter. OTOH, cooler/saner heads may/will prevail eventually. Good > luck to *every*body. Soothing purrs sent to one and all. Please don't leave. If you do, the net monsters will win. I've been lurking more than anything lately, partly because of the problems with Rob, and partly because I felt that what I wanted to say would not contribute to the group.
After thinking about it, I decided to go back to the original format for the group, posting stories about the cats. It is what I recommend most of us do. Of course, if you need love and purrs, please post for them. I won't be replying to those requests (unless it is SO major I can't help myself) but I will be thinking of you all and asking the owners to add to the purr wheel spinning around.
Pam S. saddened by the possible loss of more of my favorite family members
Christine Burel - 26 Jun 2005 05:50 GMT > >I did the same thing Bob did. I got ticked off at some rancorous > > posts and, after over seven years with the Group, I quit. It lasted [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > Pam S. saddened by the possible loss of more of my favorite family members Christine Burel - 26 Jun 2005 17:47 GMT Looking forward to the Shirk kitty stories, Pam! I simply refuse to let the "pot-stirrers" ruin the newsgroup for me. Christine
> >I did the same thing Bob did. I got ticked off at some rancorous > > posts and, after over seven years with the Group, I quit. It lasted [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > Pam S. saddened by the possible loss of more of my favorite family members badwilson - 26 Jun 2005 04:00 GMT > I did the same thing Bob did. I got ticked off at some rancorous > posts and, after over seven years with the Group, I quit. It lasted [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Jeanne There may be bickering and some really insensitive posts, but I think that crap is far outweighed by the awesome coming together of this group for Harri Roadcat and others. You gotta take the good with the bad, I'm afraid. And you're wrong. You *would* be missed. -- Britta "There is no snooze button on a cat who wants breakfast." -- Unknown Check out pictures of Vino at: http://photos.yahoo.com/badwilson click on the Vino album
|
|
|