Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / Cat Anecdotes / June 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

I'm with Bob...maybe

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
JBHajos - 25 Jun 2005 14:30 GMT
I did the same thing Bob did.  I got ticked off at some rancorous
posts and, after over seven years with the Group, I quit.  It lasted
about 6 - 8 weeks.  Like Bob, I checked in again a week or so ago,
only to find even more horrendous viciousness going on.  I've read
every post and I find this morning that it still hasn't abated much.

Bob, apparently, decided to quit the Group permanently.  That was my
first inclination as well.  I wouldn't be missed anyway so it wouldn't
matter.  OTOH, cooler/saner heads may/will prevail eventually. Good
luck to *every*body.  Soothing purrs sent to one and all.

Jeanne  
Victor Martinez - 25 Jun 2005 14:52 GMT
> first inclination as well.  I wouldn't be missed anyway so it wouldn't
> matter.  OTOH, cooler/saner heads may/will prevail eventually. Good

What makes you think you wouldn't be missed? I for one have always
enjoyed reading you and I worried with you when Sandy was having kidney
problems.

Signature

Victor M. Martinez
Owned and operated by the Fantastic Seven (TM)
Send your spam here: uce@ftc.gov
Email me here: pistorLITTER@BOXaustin.rr.com

sriddles@aol.com - 25 Jun 2005 16:31 GMT
> I did the same thing Bob did.  I got ticked off at some rancorous
> posts and, after over seven years with the Group, I quit.  It lasted
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Jeanne

Bob's leaving is the group's loss. He is a good person. I don't know
him IRL, but a long time ago I posted about some trouble and he
e-mailed me with a very kind, generous offer. He didn't even know me.
But I suspect that's very indicative of the kind of person he is.  I
understand his disgust, and yours.
Everybody contributes in their own way and makes a group what it is. I
would miss your posts.

Sherry
Adrian - 25 Jun 2005 16:48 GMT
>> I did the same thing Bob did.  I got ticked off at some rancorous
>> posts and, after over seven years with the Group, I quit.  It lasted
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Sherry

Like you, I understand Bob's point of view, it's sad when good people
feel they can't post here anymore.
Signature

Adrian (Owned by Snoopy & Bagheera)
A house is not a home, without a cat.

Marina - 25 Jun 2005 16:46 GMT
> I did the same thing Bob did.  I got ticked off at some rancorous
> posts and, after over seven years with the Group, I quit.  It lasted
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> matter.  OTOH, cooler/saner heads may/will prevail eventually. Good
> luck to *every*body.  Soothing purrs sent to one and all.

I'll admit I've been thinking of leaving lately, too, but apparently I'm
too stubborn. Leaving would mean that the nastiness would win. So I had
a reverse reaction and started posting a lot about cats and pics and
stuff. I for one would miss you, Jeanne. I'd been wondering lately where
*both* our Jeannes are. Please don't leave. Too many good people have
left already. That's why the nastiness is winning.

Signature

Marina, Frank and Miranda. In loving memory of Nikki.
marina (dot) kurten (at) pp (dot) inet (dot) fi
Pics at http://uk.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/frankiennikki/
and http://community.webshots.com/user/frankiennikki

sriddles@aol.com - 25 Jun 2005 17:38 GMT
> I'll admit I've been thinking of leaving lately, too, but apparently I'm
> too stubborn. Leaving would mean that the nastiness would win.

You are absolutely right. I have been on groups that had a great group
of core posters.Then people move in who just used it because they
thought it was OK to use it as a free-for-all forum to vent whatever
problems they didn't want to vent in their "regular" groups. While it
wasn't utopia to begin with, it became totally unreadable and
impossible to separate the good information from the recreational
flame-festing. Half those core members have disappeared, and that group
isn't worth reading anymore. "The nastiness won."
Don't you dare leave. If you do, I will have to design a virus that
attacks your computer and makes you read and post to rpca before your
computer will work. NOT a small fete for an AOL user/Dell owner. Ha!!
Speaking of MIA members, where is Jeanette?

Sherry
Marina - 26 Jun 2005 06:09 GMT
> Don't you dare leave. If you do, I will have to design a virus that
> attacks your computer and makes you read and post to rpca before your
> computer will work. NOT a small fete for an AOL user/Dell owner.

LOL! Sherry, I'm afraid, vey afraid. I promise not to leave (except to
go to the island).

Signature

Marina, Frank and Miranda. In loving memory of Nikki.
marina (dot) kurten (at) pp (dot) inet (dot) fi
Pics at http://uk.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/frankiennikki/
and http://community.webshots.com/user/frankiennikki

Shiral - 27 Jun 2005 17:49 GMT
Please don't leave the group, Marina! How will we be able to keep tabs
up on Frank and Mir-Mir and your new Junior Partner to be!?  And we'd
miss YOU a lot, too!

  I've personally found apca to be a excellent place to talk to
friendly caring people who love cats  as much as I do. I'm so happy
that I found this online community. I consider the rancour of last week
to be a fluke, and not the normal discourse of this group at all.  I
would be very sad to see any member of it leave on account of what
happened last week.  Granted times are tense and a lot of the members
of this group have very real financial and health worries on their
minds. Sometimes, tensions will out. People sometimes say things they
regret.  And sometimes, we just have to cut some slack for each other.
The real shame would be to let an occasional verbal battle permanently
ruin a good community of people who have at least one thing very much
in common--our love of cats.

Melissa
Mary - 27 Jun 2005 18:18 GMT
> Please don't leave the group, Marina! How will we be able to keep tabs
> up on Frank and Mir-Mir and your new Junior Partner to be!?  And we'd
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Melissa

Very nicely put, Melissa.
Jeanette - 27 Jun 2005 20:42 GMT
> > I'll admit I've been thinking of leaving lately, too, but apparently I'm
> > too stubborn. Leaving would mean that the nastiness would win.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Sherry

I'm here hon, don't fret, just sitting on the sidelines and picking through
the posts. Ripley and McCavity are happily enjoying the sunshine and hot
weather we've got here at the moment.

Love

Jeanette
Hopitus - 25 Jun 2005 18:19 GMT
I've been in and out (not by choice) of rpca since late '98. Bob is a cop
(the ones I know tend to think in black and white). I'll miss him, too.
Maybe he'll check back some day.....
Here is some advice nobody asked for: for those who put their entire lives
out in a cat ng don't be "shocked and awed" when someone - anonymously or
not - grabs something you posted and bites your a.s w/it. For those
who have problems and troubles making them testy, but yet can't bring
themselves to relate these in a cat ng for all to sympathize w/and offer
suggestions.....don't vent on a poster in *another country* who was not
raised here and
has just a general idea, as we do of their country, of how people react here
(informally, relaxed USA - LOL). For the non-USA poster brought up in a more
formal - yet overt - social atmosphere - illness and stress respects no
nationality, and though I'm w/you supportwise through your entire ordeal,
and have extreme tolerance for *you* being testy, I take any fussings from
you w/salt grain because I have some pals from your land and know that when
they seem vicious to me, I live and have been brought up in a far more
casual manner/country than UK,
so let a lot roll off my back, so to speak, offense-wise. Plus, you ain't
feelin' good.
Sidebar to poster defending one who needs no defense:
(you fit category two above) - this is upclose and personal: years ago you
posted something that made me believe you are a member of a large religious
group from whom I have many pals and though I am a Christian of another
faith, have learned many of their tenets and beliefs and respect all, even
those outsiders pick on because they're so different....these pals have
(some are renegades and in bad standing w/church authorities) found good
advice and peace of mind from their Elders
in authority, once they brought themselves around to seeking such. Whatever
your problems, - if you are what I think you are - could you find help from
this source? I
know it's NOMB but hey....all kinds of stuff is hanging out here lately;
just trying to offer helpful advice.
Last word for those who think things are bad in rpca: go
lurk for a few days over @ rpch&B, read all posts there,
and rethink..quote Nazareth: "You got another think comin'".......(60's
heavymetal band, young folks)..

>> I did the same thing Bob did.  I got ticked off at some rancorous
>> posts and, after over seven years with the Group, I quit.  It lasted
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> our Jeannes are. Please don't leave. Too many good people have left
> already. That's why the nastiness is winning.
Gracecat - 25 Jun 2005 18:31 GMT
*snipped*
> Last word for those who think things are bad in rpca: go
> lurk for a few days over @ rpch&B, read all posts there,
> and rethink..quote Nazareth: "You got another think comin'".......(60's
> heavymetal band, young folks)..

Oh good lord, I just did...

It's frightening and a little disconcerting reading some of our posters
posts from there.

Grace
Enfilade - 25 Jun 2005 22:49 GMT
I'm actually surprised at how little unpleasantness is on this board,
considering it isn't actively moderated.

I spent yesterday cleaning flames and other junk out of a message board
where I'm a moderator, and dishing out warnings...

...I am /so/ not doing that here.

--Fil
just stayin' out of it
sriddles@aol.com - 25 Jun 2005 23:05 GMT
> I'm actually surprised at how little unpleasantness is on this board,
> considering it isn't actively moderated.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> --Fil

Whoa. What a task. In some groups, that would be a forty-hour job. ;-)

Sherry
Howard C. Berkowitz - 25 Jun 2005 23:44 GMT
> I've been in and out (not by choice) of rpca since late '98. Bob is a cop
> (the ones I know tend to think in black and white). I'll miss him, too.
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> so let a lot roll off my back, so to speak, offense-wise. Plus, you ain't
> feelin' good.

I'm not sure where I should have trimmed, but I was amazed by rpch+b,
and got out of it as soon as possible. I've plonked a number of
cross-posters, as what I consider arrogant fools that mislead other
people.

That's a strong statement, and I should explain. There are some people
that have a substantial amount of experience with the treatment of
various feline diseases. Many of them, however, don't understand the
underlying clinical science, and will attack someone that questions
their approach based on -- I hate to say theoretical -- medical
science(?) grounds.  I remember one that went off on a particular
laboratory test, and I suggested an alternative that involved sticking
the cat one less time and, for very specific reasons, was considerably
more accurate.

That individual started as condescending and escalated to threatening. I
don't threaten easily, but I soon realized this person's ignorance was
impregnable, and they reveled in their incorrect "knowledge".

I believe that I have been able to do a reasonable job here is
explaining the principles behind various tests, treatments, and
diseases, although there are times where I have to say "How work? Much
big magic. Spirits make happen. You try without training, spirits make
you a toad."

My professional background is in, among other things, clinical
engineering. I am not a physician or veterinarian, but I sometimes joke
that I simulate them on computers. In other words, I develop systems
that capture the expertise of top clincians, and also that include
various physiologic sensors, microbiological diagnostics, etc. To be
able to function with that, I have to spend as much time keeping up with
such things as molecular pharmacology as physical diagnosis and
treatment.

I hope I've never been guilty of responding "because I said so."  There
may have been times where I've said "here's a general explanation. To go
beyond that, you are going to have to understand a lot of theory. Here
are several respected textbooks or sites on that aspect of theory. Go
read them, and if you still have questions, I'd be happy to discuss
them."
CatNipped - 26 Jun 2005 00:41 GMT
> > I've been in and out (not by choice) of rpca since late '98. Bob is a cop
> > (the ones I know tend to think in black and white). I'll miss him, too.
[quoted text clipped - 62 lines]
> read them, and if you still have questions, I'd be happy to discuss
> them."

I know what you mean, Howard.  Unfortunately, some people see a lot of
technical jargon (that was probably copied and pasted) and think someone is
an expert (and may take advise from that "expert" that might ultimately harm
their cat!)

I read someone write "you might want to give your cat a regimen of
antibiotics just in case".  ACK!  You don't know how glad I was to hear my
vet say Thursday, "I want to hold off on giving Jessie any antibiotics until
her labs come back".  *After* her labs were back on Friday I went and picked
up her medicine.  [Researchers are finding out now that even using
antibiotic soap is starting to cause problems with antibiotic-resistant
bacteria FGS!]

People need to realize just how hazardous and far-reaching taking bad advice
can be!  I'm always glad to read what you have to say about a drug or health
condition, not only for the information you give, but for the explanations
you add - it makes it a lot easier to figure out *why* what you're saying is
something I should take into consideration!

Hugs,

CatNipped
sriddles@aol.com - 26 Jun 2005 01:04 GMT
> That's a strong statement, and I should explain. There are some people
> that have a substantial amount of experience with the treatment of
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> the cat one less time and, for very specific reasons, was considerably
> more accurate.

I always appreciate your posts, and others too that are very
knowledgeable on cat behavior/health. But I would never, no way, take
any information off a newsgroup and apply it in real life, without
discussing with a vet, or in the case of behavioral issues, just
applying some good common sense. Newsgroup info. is, to me, a place to
take in enough information for me to use as a tool to research further
on my own; ideas if you will. Even the small stuff always needs to be
thought through. Someone once suggested putting litterboxes in garages,
to eliminate the mess and smell. Then their own cat ended up
accidentally poisoned. You can't take anybody's word as gospel to apply
to your own situation.

Sherry

> That individual started as condescending and escalated to threatening. I
> don't threaten easily, but I soon realized this person's ignorance was
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> read them, and if you still have questions, I'd be happy to discuss
> them."
CatNipped - 26 Jun 2005 02:07 GMT
> > That's a strong statement, and I should explain. There are some people
> > that have a substantial amount of experience with the treatment of
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> accidentally poisoned. You can't take anybody's word as gospel to apply
> to your own situation.

Nope, I believe it turned out that cat had an infection and needed
antibiotics - not poisoned.  ;>

Hugs,

CatNipped

> Sherry
> >
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> > read them, and if you still have questions, I'd be happy to discuss
> > them."
sriddles@aol.com - 26 Jun 2005 02:18 GMT
> > > That's a strong statement, and I should explain. There are some people
> > > that have a substantial amount of experience with the treatment of
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> CatNipped

Guess antibiotics aren't the devil, after all. :->

Sherry
Howard C. Berkowitz - 26 Jun 2005 02:54 GMT
> > > > That's a strong statement, and I should explain. There are some
> > > > people
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>
> Guess antibiotics aren't the devil, after all. :->

Antibiotics revolutionized medicine, and are still some of the most
valuable of all drugs. My first original research problem was on a means
of overcoming bacterial resistance to penicillins.

I think it's fair to say that I have a fairly thorough knowledge of
antibiotics.  While I will admit that at one period of low funds, I did
check the local Petco to see if they had an appropriate antibiotic for
fish that I could take, you'll find I am much more in favor of keeping
antibiotics on prescription than I am opioids or cannabinoids.

The latter two are "drugs of abuse" that rarely induce aggression -- I
am quite opposed to decriminalizing amphetamines and related stimulant
amines, dissociative anesthetics such as phencyclidine (PCP) and
ketamine, and anabolic steroids.  All of these can induce extreme
aggression, often simultaneously suppressing pain.

I go reasonably ballistic when I see antibiotics used as agricultural
growth supplements. Recently, it was discovered that the Chinese had
used amantadine widely in their chicken farming -- rendering one of the
relatively few antiviral drugs useless against bird flu.

So I am all in favor of informed, responsible use of antibiotics, and
all against people who don't know all the consequences of using them.  
For example, it's generally bad practice to give a "shotgun" mixture of
antibiotics when you don't have a firm diagnosis -- and absolutely
appropriate when there is an overwhelming, life-threatening infection
such as Harri Roadcat appeared to have.
sriddles@aol.com - 26 Jun 2005 03:22 GMT
> > > > > That's a strong statement, and I should explain. There are some
> > > > > people
[quoted text clipped - 62 lines]
> appropriate when there is an overwhelming, life-threatening infection
> such as Harri Roadcat appeared to have.

Are veterinary-grade antibiotics even available to the public w/out a
prescription? (besides cow penicillin; I know that's available). I
mean, Baytril, ceflex, the ones often prescribed for cats. I am also
vehemently opposed to anybody doling out antibiotics to animals/people
without a diagnosis, for the record. But besides life-threatening
infectsion, without antibiotics, think how many minor problems would
turn major without vet's ability to provide them.
I don't get the hoopla about opiods, really. But I had cluster
migraines for years and preferred the old-fashioned opiods to whatever
new wonder zonker came out. And it turned out many of the new wonder
zonkers were far more dangerous.
Your story about the Chinese reminds me of a conversation with someone
who works at a feed mill. He said we would all be nervous if we knew
all the "medications" that went into cattle feed. Antibiotics? I hope
not.
BTW, what do you know about Leviquin, speaking of antibiotics. You can
e-mail me off-list if you like. Besides costing $12 per dose, the
informational brochre is a little creepy.

Sherry
Howard C. Berkowitz - 27 Jun 2005 02:15 GMT
> Are veterinary-grade antibiotics even available to the public w/out a
> prescription? (besides cow penicillin; I know that's available).

For official cat use, no. I have been surprised, however, how many are
available in pet stores for use with tropical fish. Unfortunately, when
I had what was pretty clearly cellulitis in my leg, and really didn't
want to spend $800-1000 to be told that (admittedly ruling out some
dangerous alternatives about which I would take an informed risk).

> I mean, Baytril, ceflex, the ones often prescribed for cats. I am also
> vehemently opposed to anybody doling out antibiotics to animals/people
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> new wonder zonker came out. And it turned out many of the new wonder
> zonkers were far more dangerous.

From a "recreational" standpoint, I don't have much problem with
decriminalizing drugs, such as opioids and cannabinoids, that are rarely
associated with aggressive behavior. Amphetamines, PCP, and others that
cause aggressive behavior is another matter.

Long-term opioid use is generally accepted as appropriate in some
non-terminal patients. Use of opioids in headache sometimes is
appropriate, and sometimes can worsen the situation.  Generally, their
use has to be individualized by an experienced neurologist.

Cluster, as opposed to migraine, is difficult to treat. I do know
several physicians that swear that many attacks can be aborted if the
patient breathes 100% oxygen or a few minutes. Getting a small oxygen
tank might be something to discuss with your doctor.

> Your story about the Chinese reminds me of a conversation with someone
> who works at a feed mill. He said we would all be nervous if we knew
> all the "medications" that went into cattle feed. Antibiotics? I hope
> not.

There is MASSIVE use of antibiotics in animal feed, with much
controversy on Baytril, in particular, in poultry feed. I am appalled by
the practice.

> BTW, what do you know about Leviquin, speaking of antibiotics. You can
> e-mail me off-list if you like. Besides costing $12 per dose, the
> informational brochre is a little creepy.

It's a member of the fluoroquinolone class of antibiotics, the first of
which was ciprofloxacin (Cipro).  Levofloxacin (Levaquin) is what might
be loosely called a second-generation ciprofloxacin, along with
gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin. These do demonstrate better effectiveness
in some diseases, such as community-acquired pneumonia, but in other
conditions, seem to be comparable to the older, now-generic
fluoroquinolones.  I didn't see, in a quick database search, a side
effect profile for levofloxacin that seemed significantly different than
other fluoroquinolones.

Feel free to email if there are specific questions.
Hopitus - 27 Jun 2005 02:45 GMT
Antibiotics put in cattle feed is why many have turned to consuming organic
meat these days. Since it's mega expensive, I just dropped down to tiny
portions of beef once in a long while....and eat so much chicken I expect to
let out a "caw" any time. Since the antibiotics also go into the cow's milk,
and it's just a little more, expense-wise, I have been drinking organic
fat-free milk (I hate milk but you gotta go w/it on cold cereal!). Learned
something here from good ole Howard - I didn't know chickens were getting
antibiotics too! It's enough (well, not quite) to morph me into a
vegetarian....LOL.
Don't feel like the Lone Ranger 'cause you didn't know about the
antibiotics, Sherry....the only reason I knew is because my DIL works in
Boulder @ home base of Wild Oats Foods (organic to the max).

>> Are veterinary-grade antibiotics even available to the public w/out a
>> prescription? (besides cow penicillin; I know that's available).
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
>
> Feel free to email if there are specific questions.
Karen - 27 Jun 2005 02:51 GMT
> Antibiotics put in cattle feed is why many have turned to consuming organic
> meat these days. Since it's mega expensive, I just dropped down to tiny
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> antibiotics, Sherry....the only reason I knew is because my DIL works in
> Boulder @ home base of Wild Oats Foods (organic to the max).

You know what is amazing about organic milk? It LASTS. I could never buy a
half gallon without it going bad in a week. I can get a half gallon of
organic with a three week out "use by" date. Gives me plenty of time. I
don't know what the difference is, but I sure like it.
Biskybabe - 27 Jun 2005 03:06 GMT
>> Antibiotics put in cattle feed is why many have turned to consuming organic
>> meat these days. Since it's mega expensive, I just dropped down to tiny
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> organic with a three week out "use by" date. Gives me plenty of time. I
> don't know what the difference is, but I sure like it.

And it tastes so much better!

I have to admit, when I'm feeling cheap I buy the non-organic milk from
the organic farm. I'm trusting the farm but I believe that the
non-organic milk is from cows that were treated with anti-biotics for a
specific condition. After they've had anti-biotics for any reason they
can't go back into the organic herd. But the management, feed and
everything is the same.

bisky
Monique Y. Mudama - 27 Jun 2005 03:09 GMT
> You know what is amazing about organic milk? It LASTS. I could never
> buy a half gallon without it going bad in a week. I can get a half
> gallon of organic with a three week out "use by" date. Gives me
> plenty of time. I don't know what the difference is, but I sure like
> it.

I've noticed that Horizons milk lasts for about a month.

But it's not just organic milk.  We get milk delivered to our door --
guaranteed milked in the last day -- and that stuff lasts forever,
too.  Pretty sure it's not organic, but it also hasn't travelled
around the country and then sat on a shelf for a few days.

Signature

monique, who spoils Oscar unmercifully

pictures: http://www.bounceswoosh.org/rpca

Mary - 27 Jun 2005 03:14 GMT
> > You know what is amazing about organic milk? It LASTS. I could never
> > buy a half gallon without it going bad in a week. I can get a half
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> too.  Pretty sure it's not organic, but it also hasn't travelled
> around the country and then sat on a shelf for a few days.

It is the fat that makes it keep.
sriddles@aol.com - 27 Jun 2005 03:17 GMT
> > > You know what is amazing about organic milk? It LASTS. I could never
> > > buy a half gallon without it going bad in a week. I can get a half
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> It is the fat that makes it keep.

If that's true, then why does skim milk last so much longer than whole?
DH drinks whole, I drink skim. "His" milk always goes bad faster than
mine does.

Sherry
Mary - 27 Jun 2005 03:54 GMT
> > > > You know what is amazing about organic milk? It LASTS. I could never
> > > > buy a half gallon without it going bad in a week. I can get a half
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> DH drinks whole, I drink skim. "His" milk always goes bad faster than
> mine does.

Now, see, in my experience, whole milk lasted way longer than
2%. When I looked into why, I was told that fat preserves things.
Like the reason you don't really have to refrigerate butter or cheese.
(I don't leave the butter out but my Mama sure did.)

Anyone else know anything?
Monique Y. Mudama - 27 Jun 2005 03:28 GMT
>> But it's not just organic milk.  We get milk delivered to our door
>> -- guaranteed milked in the last day -- and that stuff lasts
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> It is the fat that makes it keep.

The milk we get delivered is 1%.

Signature

monique, who spoils Oscar unmercifully

pictures: http://www.bounceswoosh.org/rpca

Mary - 27 Jun 2005 03:51 GMT
> >> But it's not just organic milk.  We get milk delivered to our door
> >> -- guaranteed milked in the last day -- and that stuff lasts
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> The milk we get delivered is 1%.

Hmm. Then I wonder what it is? I am really curious to know
what might give it a longer shelf life.
Monique Y. Mudama - 27 Jun 2005 04:00 GMT
>> The milk we get delivered is 1%.
>
> Hmm. Then I wonder what it is? I am really curious to know what
> might give it a longer shelf life.

Yeah; I dunno.

I'd read about more fat allowing a longer shelf life for baked goods,
too (my lowfat cookbook warned that the cornbread wouldn't last as
long as the stuff made with full-fat buttermilk).

Signature

monique, who spoils Oscar unmercifully

pictures: http://www.bounceswoosh.org/rpca

CatNipped - 26 Jun 2005 03:29 GMT
> > > > That's a strong statement, and I should explain. There are some people
> > > > that have a substantial amount of experience with the treatment of
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
> Sherry

Nope, indeed not - they are literally life savers!

Hugs,

CatNipped
Hopitus - 26 Jun 2005 02:00 GMT
Heh....Howard, I have greatest respect for your medical explanations (unlike
those resident advisors you mention, you do *not* give "advice"....only
explanations, which I for one appreciate. IMHO you are lucky to be on this
earth still after all the bypass, etc. you've had. My record: only 2
angiograms/stent placements/beta therapy (to date). Hopitus admits when I am
clueless about anything, and the only thing after 30 years mainly ER
hospital work I'd assert being expert on is xray procedures (much more
disgusting and grody than dangerous, and no one really wants to hear about
them unless they're *going to have one*, for which I can't blame them).
You're correct totally about the "advisors" 'tudes toward competitive
knowledge, though. Many at that ng have "message-blocked" this one or that
one; I've just fled even visiting it because of the infighting there...it's
lost its usefulness to me.
I fled to rpca several years ago when alt.cats was getting wacko...these
days it seems fairly sane...ROFL. Yowie's right; rpca is more like a
family...or if I may: a group of friends. As I say OIAW...it's all relative,
ain't it?

>> I've been in and out (not by choice) of rpca since late '98. Bob is a cop
>> (the ones I know tend to think in black and white). I'll miss him, too.
[quoted text clipped - 62 lines]
> read them, and if you still have questions, I'd be happy to discuss
> them."
Takayuki - 26 Jun 2005 04:56 GMT
>I believe that I have been able to do a reasonable job here is
>explaining the principles behind various tests, treatments, and
>diseases, although there are times where I have to say "How work? Much
>big magic. Spirits make happen. You try without training, spirits make
>you a toad."

Phht.  This is funny!  It is true that the rest of us just your
everyday, normal hoomin catslaves, but what little I've understood of
your explanations were very logical and enlightening, and we owe you
thanks.
Mary - 26 Jun 2005 05:53 GMT
> >I believe that I have been able to do a reasonable job here is
> >explaining the principles behind various tests, treatments, and
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> your explanations were very logical and enlightening, and we owe you
> thanks.

I have always gotten a lot out of Howard's posts. He has so much
good-natured patience and a great sense of humor. I look for his posts
first thing!
Dan M - 26 Jun 2005 06:06 GMT
> I have always gotten a lot out of Howard's posts. He has so much
> good-natured patience and a great sense of humor. I look for his posts
> first thing!

Likewise. Through this hospital thing with Harri, hearing Howard's
explanation of several medical issues has helpe me to develop a better
understanding of what's going on with my baby Roadcat, and that has been
making it easier to deal with the stress. I greatly appreciate Howard's
input.

Dan
Susan M - 26 Jun 2005 06:27 GMT
I always appreciate your information and responses Howard.  Thank you for
your knowledge!!!

Susan M
Otis and Chester

>> I've been in and out (not by choice) of rpca since late '98. Bob is a cop
>> (the ones I know tend to think in black and white). I'll miss him, too.
[quoted text clipped - 62 lines]
> read them, and if you still have questions, I'd be happy to discuss
> them."
Howard C. Berkowitz - 27 Jun 2005 02:17 GMT
Thanks for all the kind input.

I might ask, however, if you know the technical term for the physician
or veterinarian that graduates at the bottom of his or her class?

*spoiler space*

§

"doctor"
Debbie Wilson - 25 Jun 2005 19:13 GMT
> I'll admit I've been thinking of leaving lately, too,

Nooo! Please don't. :-)

> but apparently I'm too stubborn.

Good :-)

Deb.
Signature

http://www.scientific-art.com

"He looked a fierce and quarrelsome cat, but claw he never would;
He only bit the ones he loved, because they tasted good." S. Greenfield

SuzQ - 26 Jun 2005 00:54 GMT

Marina <frankiennikki@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

> I'll admit I've been thinking of leaving lately, too,

Nooo! Please don't. :-)

> but apparently I'm too stubborn.

Good :-)

Deb.
Signature



======================================
1. What Deb said, besides you MUST keep me updated on Frank & Mir-Mir.
2. I just stay out of the arguements, they usually go away. But I hate it
when regulars go away mad/hurt.
3. Its usually 2 or 3 people argueing not the group.
Suz

wafflycat - 25 Jun 2005 20:51 GMT
> I'll admit I've been thinking of leaving lately, too, but apparently I'm
> too stubborn. Leaving would mean that the nastiness would win. So I had a
> reverse reaction and started posting a lot about cats and pics and stuff.
> I for one would miss you, Jeanne. I'd been wondering lately where *both*
> our Jeannes are. Please don't leave. Too many good people have left
> already. That's why the nastiness is winning.

You aren't the only one who has been thinking of dropping out of the group.
I've been lurking far more than I used to do. The nastiness that has been
developing in the group is obvious - and very, very sad.

helen s
Yowie - 27 Jun 2005 01:30 GMT
> > I did the same thing Bob did.  I got ticked off at some rancorous
> > posts and, after over seven years with the Group, I quit.  It lasted
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> *both* our Jeannes are. Please don't leave. Too many good people have
> left already. That's why the nastiness is winning.

No way are you leaving when Mere is just getting into the peak of
hoolikittenness!!

Yowie
Gracecat - 27 Jun 2005 03:27 GMT
>> > I did the same thing Bob did.  I got ticked off at some rancorous
>> > posts and, after over seven years with the Group, I quit.  It lasted
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Yowie

I'm not ashamed of using Eve stories as bait ;)

Grace
Yowie - 27 Jun 2005 04:36 GMT
> >> > I did the same thing Bob did.  I got ticked off at some rancorous
> >> > posts and, after over seven years with the Group, I quit.  It lasted
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> I'm not ashamed of using Eve stories as bait ;)

And nor should you be! I am amazed at just how upset I was (and still am)
over the loss of Eve, and I had never met her or her Mom. The reason, I
think, is because you 'shared' her with us so well that we got to know her
and care about her so much that it became Real Life anyway.

Thankyou.

Yowie
Marina - 27 Jun 2005 06:15 GMT
> No way are you leaving when Mere is just getting into the peak of
> hoolikittenness!!

'Just getting into the peak'??? 'Just getting into the peak'?????????
You mean it gets worse??? :oP

Signed Sleepless in Helsinki (Miranda thought it was a good idea to
overturn flower pots and dig the dirt out of the ones she didn't
overturn. A few days ago, I cut up a lime and strew bits of lime on top
of the soil, but they are drying and don't smell as strongly any more.
Note to self: buy more citrus fruit.)

Signature

Marina, Frank and Miranda. In loving memory of Nikki.
marina (dot) kurten (at) pp (dot) inet (dot) fi
Pics at http://uk.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/frankiennikki/
and http://community.webshots.com/user/frankiennikki

JBHajos - 27 Jun 2005 16:30 GMT
>I'll admit I've been thinking of leaving lately, too, but apparently I'm
>too stubborn. Leaving would mean that the nastiness would win.

 Glad you're staying.  Stubborn is good!!  I think I'll stay with it
too - I'm not stubborn, just *nosy*.  Curiosity about what's going on
with the Group will keep me at least lurking.  And, you know, why
should I punish myself and do without all the goodies?  Such as, had I
not returned I wouldn't have known about Harri Roadcat's ordeal and
was able to send purrs and a donation I couldn't have otherwise.  The
Group has been too good for too long to just take my marbles and
leave.  Love y'all!!!  

Jeanne
Marina - 27 Jun 2005 17:32 GMT
>>I'll admit I've been thinking of leaving lately, too, but apparently I'm
>>too stubborn. Leaving would mean that the nastiness would win.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Group has been too good for too long to just take my marbles and
> leave.  Love y'all!!!  

Yay! Glad you decided to stick around, Jeanne! Love you too.

Signature

Marina, Frank and Miranda. In loving memory of Nikki.
marina (dot) kurten (at) pp (dot) inet (dot) fi
Pics at http://uk.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/frankiennikki/
and http://community.webshots.com/user/frankiennikki

Dan M - 25 Jun 2005 16:51 GMT
> Bob, apparently, decided to quit the Group permanently.  That was my
> first inclination as well.  I wouldn't be missed anyway so it wouldn't
> matter.  OTOH, cooler/saner heads may/will prevail eventually. Good
> luck to *every*body.  Soothing purrs sent to one and all.
>
> Jeanne  

Bob will be missed, and if you had decided to leave you would be missed
as well. Sooner or later (please, let it be sooner!) cooler heads WILL
prevail. Thanks for sticking with us.

Dan
Ted Davis - 25 Jun 2005 18:21 GMT
>I did the same thing Bob did.  I got ticked off at some rancorous
>posts and, after over seven years with the Group, I quit.  It lasted
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>matter.  OTOH, cooler/saner heads may/will prevail eventually. Good
>luck to *every*body.  Soothing purrs sent to one and all.

Curiously perhaps, but I haven't seen any of that.  Or perhaps it's
just that I know how to read newsgroups so as to see the good stuff
and miss the bad, though sometimes I do feel left out for not even
knowing about the flame wars.

usenet is a rational anarchy: there is no central authority to punish
offensive users - that is up to the users themselves, individually and
(better) collectively.  It is possible sometimes to drive offensive
users away from a group.  One technique that has worked is to put a
notice in your replies to some question that foo is likely to reply
but should be ignored as a troll or flamer.  Of course, foo then
starts posting under another name, but it's generally easy enough to
recognize the style (in one case, not only was the style recognizable,
but the offender always posted using the same obsolete software from
the same ISP in a small country - he still does, but not in *that*
group).

Flamers get their kicks by riling good people up to the point where
they loose control and resort to flaming themselves.  Unless you are
expert at toying with flamers, they are best ignored - *do not reply
to flamers*.  People who are targets of flamers quickly learn who they
are, as do other regular readers of deep threads.

For most readers, a good rule to follow is that everything of value in
a thread is probably contained in the top four levels: original
question, response to question, request for clarification, and
clarification - if the original posting isn't a question, that leaves
only three levels.  Multiple levels of messages exchanged between two
or three people (with a few others jumping in to defend the one being
flamed) are symptoms of a flame war and are best ignored.

A good news reader program can help by allowing you to mark threads to
ignore and by automatically removing (or marking read) everything from
specific users. The most useful feature is good, and configurable,
message threading - without threading, it is impossible to recognize
flame wars by their characteristic structure.  Microsoft does not
offer a news reader, and the news reader features in some of its other
applications are at best rude.  Google is not a news reader
application.  I have yet to find a decent news reader attached to any
web browser - there are several very good ones available for free
(Free Agent appears to be the most commonly used free one, though the
commercial version (Agent) is better).

It is also often said that usenet users need to wear asbestos
underwear when going on-line - that means that a thick skin - immune
to insults and offenses - is a Good Thing.

Signature

T.E.D. (tdavis@gearbox.maem.umr.edu)

glsummer@neptunelink.com - 25 Jun 2005 18:27 GMT
>I did the same thing Bob did.  I got ticked off at some rancorous
>posts and, after over seven years with the Group, I quit.  It lasted
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>Jeanne  

Jeanne, I for one would miss you.  I hope you will reconsider and
stay.  It has been rare that major bickering has gone on here (only a
few times I recall in 6? 7? years).  It happens sometimes.  But it
isn't the tone and temper of the group as a whole.

Please stay and post some funny cat stories :-)

Ginger-lyn

Home Pages:
 http://www.spiritrealm.com/summer/
 http://www.angelfire.com/folk/glsummer (homepage & cats)
 http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~summer/index.htm (genealogy)
 http://www.movieanimals.bravehost.com/ (The Violence Against
                        Animals in Movies Website)
Christina Websell - 25 Jun 2005 20:27 GMT
Please don't leave Jeanne or Bob.  It's probably my fault for asking for so
much support that this has all kicked off and what I said about Jill's
partner's dog.  This has been a bad week or two.

Tweed

>I did the same thing Bob did.  I got ticked off at some rancorous
> posts and, after over seven years with the Group, I quit.  It lasted
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Jeanne
sriddles@aol.com - 25 Jun 2005 22:41 GMT
> Please don't leave Jeanne or Bob.  It's probably my fault for asking for so
> much support that this has all kicked off and what I said about Jill's
> partner's dog.  This has been a bad week or two.
>
> Tweed

No one, NO ONE thinks you have asked for "so much support." Please
don't think that way. Good grief. Seanette is only one person lashing
out for reasons we probably don't even know, and I am just so sorry you
got hurt in the process.

Sherry
Yowie - 27 Jun 2005 01:38 GMT
> > Please don't leave Jeanne or Bob.  It's probably my fault for asking for so
> > much support that this has all kicked off and what I said about Jill's
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> out for reasons we probably don't even know, and I am just so sorry you
> got hurt in the process.

I don't think Seanette (or for that matter any poster in the flame threads)
meant to start a flame war. I think perhaps words were chosen poorly, and
with all the sadness, grief and worry this group has endured, as individuals
and as a group, that it just boiled over. Even in the most loving families,
that happens occasionally when everyone is at the end of their tether. The
good thing about families, though, is that after the flames are out, and the
ashes cleaned away, they forgive each other and get on with living, laughing
and loving again.

Yowie
Karen - 26 Jun 2005 00:18 GMT
> Please don't leave Jeanne or Bob.  It's probably my fault for asking for so
> much support that this has all kicked off and what I said about Jill's
> partner's dog.  This has been a bad week or two.
>
> Tweed

Tweed, that is just NOT so. It has nothing to do with your needing us.
Please do not think that. This just makes me so upset if you think that
because it is patently UNtrue.
Mary - 26 Jun 2005 03:39 GMT
> Please don't leave Jeanne or Bob.  It's probably my fault for asking for so
> much support that this has all kicked off and what I said about Jill's
> partner's dog.  This has been a bad week or two.
>
> Tweed

How can anyone demand and expect that people are not going to
have bad days and have arguments?

I see those who INSIST that everything be constantly smooth
sailing as bullies, plain and simple. Life is not like that. People are
not like that. Interacting honestly is not like that.

And who wants dishonesty?

Shall we always make nice-nice in the group and say what we
really mean to our spouses or to one another in email?

How dreadful and depressing. How terribly hypocritical
and deeply dishonest.

I think the "wounded" need to grow up and stop trying
to control people in such a way that it is always Disneyland
around here.

That said, PLEASE KILLFILE ME!!!!!

Bleah. I think the only thing worse than a moderated
group is someone who is willing to do the job, Enfilade.
Why bother to interact at all if you cannot be honest?
JBHajos - 27 Jun 2005 16:54 GMT
>I see those who INSIST that everything be constantly smooth
>sailing as bullies, plain and simple.

 Guess I'm just a cotton-pickin' bully then :)  Though I don't
"insist", I do expect a modicum of civility from *this* Group.
Honesty has nothing to do with it, common courtesy does.  No, I don't
expect everything to be 100% sweetsie-poo but brutal honesty can be
tempered.  And usually is.

>I think the "wounded" need to grow up and stop trying
>to control people in such a way that it is always Disneyland
>around here.

 But Disneyland is a lot of fun!!!  Nah, I don't think I'll grow up;
too much fun to try to "control" (???) people :)   I like the RPCA of
old - - if nastiness is "progress" I've missed something in the
translation.

>That said, PLEASE KILLFILE ME!!!!!

   OKAY.

Jeanne
Mary - 27 Jun 2005 18:21 GMT
> >I see those who INSIST that everything be constantly smooth
> >sailing as bullies, plain and simple.
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Jeanne

That was easy. :) I love authoritarian personalities!
Christina Websell - 29 Jun 2005 00:31 GMT
>> >I see those who INSIST that everything be constantly smooth
>> >sailing as bullies, plain and simple.
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> That was easy. :) I love authoritarian personalities!

Mary, you are starting to bring your ach&b persona here. Please don't.

Tweed
Mary - 29 Jun 2005 16:47 GMT
> >> >I see those who INSIST that everything be constantly smooth
> >> >sailing as bullies, plain and simple.
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> Tweed

What an odd request. I have no idea how to comply with it.
I am the same person here as I am there. When someone posts
horse sh.t here I call it horse sh.t. Why on earth would anyone
assume otherwise?

I will continue to speak out against those who would reduce
whole human beings into little phony spouters of "nice nice."

There is a deeply hyocritical element here--it is like the
elephant in the middle of the room that everyone can
see but nobody had better mention. It amuses me. Your
false sense of control also amuses me, but many of you are
so fragile, I would not dream of doing anything to shake it.

That said, I hope you're feeling well and well on the mend.
:)
CatNipped - 29 Jun 2005 17:24 GMT
> > >> >I see those who INSIST that everything be constantly smooth
> > >> >sailing as bullies, plain and simple.
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
> That said, I hope you're feeling well and well on the mend.
> :)

What I would hope of this group is that people will speak their minds, and
the truth, but do so without attacking a person (e.g. attack the argument,
not the person making the argument).  I think that can be done in a civil
manner, and I think that, for the most part, we are able to do it here.
This is the *ONLY* group I've ever seen that can have a 100+ post thread on
politics, where everyone was arguing their own point of view, without anyone
using a mean word to an "opponent" - incredible!  You don't have to
compromise your honesty or integrity in order to be "nice".

I know I've taken some flak for not being as polite in rpch+b as I am here.
But, in my defense, that was only after I had been (viciously) attacked,
cursed at, got a foul-languaged message on my cell phone, nasty threatening
emails, and was accused of committing a felony.  My frustration at all this
while *I* was trying to be nice caused me to strike back in kind (not an
excuse, just an explanation).  Before that, I posted the same way there as I
do here.  Being a bit more "shoot from the hip" is just the tone of that
group, and several members from here have "dropped the "F" bomb" over there
for quite some time before I even started posting there.  There's absolutely
nothing wrong with that, in fact most groups are like that.  But that's
*not* the tone of this group.

Different strokes for different folks.  I'm not going to say either one is
better than the other, like government, people get the newsgroup they want
by how they act.

Hugs,

CatNipped
Mary - 29 Jun 2005 17:36 GMT
> I know I've taken some flak for not being as polite in rpch+b as I am here.

Here's the rub: the critics tell you that you must adhere to certain
"standards of civility" here, and you do. Then when you go elsewhere
to express yourself more fully, they say "you only use this group as
a place to say &#@@&$!"

When, in fact, they ought to be happy that you are willing to comply
with their wishes here. Because all compliance is done willingly.
I generally comply because I have no reason not to, and why
should I want to upset such nice people? :) And I mean that.

Just as I say that if you can dish it out but can't take it,
"hand in your spoon," it is also true that if you don't
dish it out you won't be getting any from me.

Very simple.
CatNipped - 29 Jun 2005 17:39 GMT
> > I know I've taken some flak for not being as polite in rpch+b as I am
> here.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Very simple.

You're exactly right!  It's just like I say when I talk about parenting -
people will live up to your expectations of them (and also tend to treat you
the way you treat them).

Hugs,

CatNipped
Enfilade - 29 Jun 2005 20:10 GMT
Mary:  you said *quote* Bleah. I think the only thing worse than a
moderated
group is someone who is willing to do the job, Enfilade.
Why bother to interact at all if you cannot be honest?  *end quote*

Here is my reply:

Because you can say you don't agree with someone in two ways:

1.  I don't agree with you.
2.  **** you, ****face--obviously you are a retarded moron.

Which is more pleasant to read?  Which is more appropriate for a board
used by children as well as adults?  Which encourages intelligent
conversation and debate, and which degenerates quickly into insults and
name-calling?

How will we hold the Allspark board to the "Family" rating we tell
parents it has, so that they will continue to allow their children to
go there, without moderating?

That is why I moderate it.

Now, a group like this isn't pitched as a "Family" or "appropriate for
children" board.  We're mostly adults here, to my knowledge, and the
odd swear word might not be such a big deal.  Look at the newsgroups as
a whole though--how many of them are made up of spam, advertisements,
and trolling?

As for the "Expressing oneself honestly," there are some forms of
"honest" expression not suited to certain situations, ie, at work, in
front of your family, or in conversation open to the general public as
this one is.  I don't think it's "dishonest" of me  to phrase my
displeasure as,

"I do not approve of your actions in this situation"

as opposed to

"F!ck off and die, d!ckweed."

--Fil
Magic Mood Jeep© - 29 Jun 2005 20:25 GMT
> Mary:  you said *quote* Bleah. I think the only thing worse than a
> moderated
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
>
> --Fil

Which is precicely why MaryS, among others, were added to my <plonk> list
ages ago.  They might be knowledgable in regards to cats, but the lanuage
they use (and the way they attack others when said other's simply disagree
with them) wasn't worth it.
Signature

The ONE and ONLY
lefthanded-pathetic-paranoid-psychotic-sarcastic-wiseass-ditzy former-blonde
in Bloomington! (And proud of it, too)©
email me at nalee1964 (at) insightbb (dot) com
http://community.webshots.com/user/mgcmdjeep

Pamela  Shirk - 25 Jun 2005 22:40 GMT
>I did the same thing Bob did.  I got ticked off at some rancorous
> posts and, after over seven years with the Group, I quit.  It lasted
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> matter.  OTOH, cooler/saner heads may/will prevail eventually. Good
> luck to *every*body.  Soothing purrs sent to one and all.

Please don't leave.  If you do, the net monsters will win.  I've been
lurking more than anything lately, partly because of the problems with Rob,
and partly because I felt that what I wanted to say would not contribute to
the group.

After thinking about it, I decided to go back to the original format for the
group, posting stories about the cats.  It is what I recommend most of us
do.  Of course, if you need love and purrs, please post for them.  I won't
be replying to those requests (unless it is SO major I can't help myself)
but I will be thinking of you all and asking the owners to add to the purr
wheel spinning around.

Pam S. saddened by the possible loss of more of my favorite family members
Christine Burel - 26 Jun 2005 05:50 GMT
> >I did the same thing Bob did.  I got ticked off at some rancorous
> > posts and, after over seven years with the Group, I quit.  It lasted
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> Pam S. saddened by the possible loss of more of my favorite family members
Christine Burel - 26 Jun 2005 17:47 GMT
Looking forward to the Shirk kitty stories, Pam!  I simply refuse to let the
"pot-stirrers" ruin the newsgroup for me.
Christine

> >I did the same thing Bob did.  I got ticked off at some rancorous
> > posts and, after over seven years with the Group, I quit.  It lasted
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> Pam S. saddened by the possible loss of more of my favorite family members
badwilson - 26 Jun 2005 04:00 GMT
> I did the same thing Bob did.  I got ticked off at some rancorous
> posts and, after over seven years with the Group, I quit.  It lasted
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Jeanne

There may be bickering and some really insensitive posts, but I think
that crap is far outweighed by the awesome coming together of this
group for Harri Roadcat and others.  You gotta take the good with the
bad, I'm afraid.
And you're wrong.  You *would* be missed.
--
Britta
"There is no snooze button on a cat who wants breakfast." -- Unknown
Check out pictures of Vino at:
http://photos.yahoo.com/badwilson click on the Vino album
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.