Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / Cat Anecdotes / May 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

[OT] Killer Sale

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Catnipped - 24 May 2005 00:12 GMT
I've been looking for (cheap) suits to give me an Executive Assistant
"image" for (hopefully) any interviews I might get (please gawd soon!).  I
found a killer sale at Sears the weekend, and got this suit *and* the
blouse - all three pieces for $40.  Then I found the shoes on sale at Ross
for $12!

Does it look Executive Assistant-y?

http://www.possibleplaces.com/CatNipped/Lori/

Hugs,

CatNipped
Monique Y. Mudama - 24 May 2005 00:29 GMT
> I've been looking for (cheap) suits to give me an Executive
> Assistant "image" for (hopefully) any interviews I might get (please
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> http://www.possibleplaces.com/CatNipped/Lori/

Looks very nice!  I thought you were going for web goddess, though,
not exec assistant?

Signature

monique, who spoils Oscar unmercifully

pictures: http://www.bounceswoosh.org/rpca

Catnipped - 24 May 2005 01:16 GMT
> > I've been looking for (cheap) suits to give me an Executive
> > Assistant "image" for (hopefully) any interviews I might get (please
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Looks very nice!  I thought you were going for web goddess, though,
> not exec assistant?

There's *NOTHING* out there for web goddess - so it has to be EA.  And
actually the *VERY* few web jobs listed are paying *LESS* than an EA!!

Hugs,

CatNipped
Monique Y. Mudama - 24 May 2005 01:55 GMT
>> Looks very nice!  I thought you were going for web goddess, though,
>> not exec assistant?
>
> There's *NOTHING* out there for web goddess - so it has to be EA.
> And actually the *VERY* few web jobs listed are paying *LESS* than
> an EA!!

Bah!

Well, I guess that's that.  On the other hand, you probably have a lot
more power as an EA than as a webperson =)

Signature

monique, who spoils Oscar unmercifully

pictures: http://www.bounceswoosh.org/rpca

Victor Martinez - 24 May 2005 02:21 GMT
> There's *NOTHING* out there for web goddess - so it has to be EA.  And
> actually the *VERY* few web jobs listed are paying *LESS* than an EA!!

Executive assistants can make a *lot* of money.

Signature

Victor M. Martinez
Owned and operated by the Fantastic Seven (TM)
Send your spam here: uce@ftc.gov
Email me here: pistorLITTER@BOXaustin.rr.com

Catnipped - 24 May 2005 02:32 GMT
> > There's *NOTHING* out there for web goddess - so it has to be EA.  And
> > actually the *VERY* few web jobs listed are paying *LESS* than an EA!!
>
> Executive assistants can make a *lot* of money.

Yeah, in New York City their average salary is $80,000 - here in Houston
it's $50,000, but goes up with experience and extra skills.  The *ONLY* good
thing about my my current job is that I'm working for the Chairman of the
Board of a large corporation (who used to be the President / CEO before the
merger) - so that counts for a lot when looking for my next job (of course I
have to refrain from mentioning what a rich b*itch, spoiled brat he is - or
maybe that would count for the good since I've managed it without killing
him yet!  ;>).

Hugs,

CatNipped
pmendhall - 24 May 2005 03:51 GMT
> have to refrain from mentioning what a rich b*itch, spoiled brat he is - or
> maybe that would count for the good since I've managed it without killing
> him yet!  ;>).

You know the higher someone gets on the corporate ladder the more they act
like kindergarteners or worse.  Actually, I've seen behavior from VPs that
kindergarteners would be put in time out for.

Good luck.

Diane
Yowie - 24 May 2005 00:41 GMT
> I've been looking for (cheap) suits to give me an Executive Assistant
> "image" for (hopefully) any interviews I might get (please gawd soon!).  I
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> http://www.possibleplaces.com/CatNipped/Lori/

Yup, you sure do!

The whole department I work for is *terrified* of our General Manager's
executive assistant. She runs the place, not the GM! And boy howdy will she
rip strips off you if you've stuffed things up and made more work for her!
Mind you, things run *really* smoothly with her around (and the place falls
apart when she's on holidays) so she must be *really* good at her job. I
think she even keep sthe GM in line!

Yowie
Jo Firey - 24 May 2005 01:28 GMT
>> I've been looking for (cheap) suits to give me an Executive Assistant
>> "image" for (hopefully) any interviews I might get (please gawd soon!).
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> Yowie

She probably works harder to keep the GM in line than she does with the rest
of you.  The last thing she needs is him/her mucking things up.

Jo
mlbriggs - 24 May 2005 01:00 GMT
> I've been looking for (cheap) suits to give me an Executive Assistant
> "image" for (hopefully) any interviews I might get (please gawd soon!).  I
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> CatNipped

Very "smart" looking.    MLB
Victor Martinez - 24 May 2005 02:21 GMT
> Does it look Executive Assistant-y?

If I were an executive, that's exactly what I would like my assistant to
look like... :)

Signature

Victor M. Martinez
Owned and operated by the Fantastic Seven (TM)
Send your spam here: uce@ftc.gov
Email me here: pistorLITTER@BOXaustin.rr.com

Catnipped - 24 May 2005 02:33 GMT
> > Does it look Executive Assistant-y?
>
> If I were an executive, that's exactly what I would like my assistant to
> look like... :)

Awwwww!  Can I come work for you!??  ;>

Hugs,

CatNipped
CATherine - 24 May 2005 02:43 GMT
>I've been looking for (cheap) suits to give me an Executive Assistant
>"image" for (hopefully) any interviews I might get (please gawd soon!).  I
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>CatNipped

You look great! Did you lose some weight? I somehow had the idea you
were "rounder"! The suit and shoes are just the right image IMO.

--
CATherine
Catnipped - 24 May 2005 02:51 GMT
> >I've been looking for (cheap) suits to give me an Executive Assistant
> >"image" for (hopefully) any interviews I might get (please gawd soon!).  I
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> You look great! Did you lose some weight? I somehow had the idea you
> were "rounder"! The suit and shoes are just the right image IMO.

Since March 12, 2004 I've lost 100 pounds!

Hugs,

CatNipped

> --
> CATherine
CATherine - 25 May 2005 03:14 GMT
>> >I've been looking for (cheap) suits to give me an Executive Assistant
>> >"image" for (hopefully) any interviews I might get (please gawd soon!).
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
>Since March 12, 2004 I've lost 100 pounds!

WOW!!! And you don't look all wrinkled or saggy or anything! How did
you keep your skin tight losing so fast? I am afraid i would have my
belly flapping around my knees if I lost that much so fast! ;-P Wait,
I remember you doing yoga with Sammy! You really look great. Kudos!

--
CATherine
CatNipped - 25 May 2005 15:12 GMT
>>> >I've been looking for (cheap) suits to give me an Executive Assistant
>>> >"image" for (hopefully) any interviews I might get (please gawd soon!).
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> belly flapping around my knees if I lost that much so fast! ;-P Wait,
> I remember you doing yoga with Sammy! You really look great. Kudos!

Thanks, but long sleeves and long pants can hide a variety of problems!  ;>
At 53, your skin just doesn't snap back any more, and having been overweight
all my life, my skin has been stretched out a lot!

Hugs,

CatNipped

> --
> CATherine
dopekitty - 24 May 2005 02:52 GMT
> I've been looking for (cheap) suits to give me an Executive Assistant
> "image" for (hopefully) any interviews I might get (please gawd soon!).  I
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> CatNipped

Wow!  Looks great!  I'm still wowed by the changes you've made in your
lifestyle to get you looking that great.

Kristy
thirty and kinda chunky
pmendhall - 24 May 2005 03:49 GMT
> Does it look Executive Assistant-y?

Yep.  HR at my work would be happy if all thier employees dressed like this.
They had to settle for Business Casual that is getting more and more relaxed
each year.

Good job.

Diane
Sam Nash - 24 May 2005 05:29 GMT
> I've been looking for (cheap) suits to give me an Executive Assistant
> "image" for (hopefully) any interviews I might get (please gawd soon!).  I
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> CatNipped

You bet.  Looks fine.  Now we just need to all get together and "purr up" a
dream job for you (and a bunch of others here)
Sam, closely supervised by Mistletoe
Helen Wheels - 24 May 2005 13:41 GMT
> Does it look Executive Assistant-y?
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> CatNipped

Well I'm just going to have to disagree with everyone - that looks more
like executive-y to me.
Very nice.
EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) - 24 May 2005 16:48 GMT
> I've been looking for (cheap) suits to give me an Executive Assistant
> "image" for (hopefully) any interviews I might get (please gawd soon!).  I
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Does it look Executive Assistant-y?

It does, indeed!  Good choice!

Someone had told me they thought Sears' quality had slipped,
so I wasn't expecting much from their remodeled Pasadena
store.  (I certainly was a bit startled at the rank of
shopping carts - ala Walmart - which confronted me when I
walked in the door.)  However, to my surprise, they have
greatly expanded their "Women's" (aka "Plus Sizes")
department, and judging from the brand names, the quality
can't be too bad.  My only criticism (which holds true for
most large-size stores) is that their fashions nowadays are
too young for the older woman.  (Makes me think that there
must be an awful lot of heavyweight younger women out there
- time was when one seldom put on wieght until of "mature"
years.)

> http://www.possibleplaces.com/CatNipped/Lori/
>
> Hugs,
>
> CatNipped
CatNipped - 24 May 2005 17:58 GMT
>> I've been looking for (cheap) suits to give me an Executive Assistant
>> "image" for (hopefully) any interviews I might get (please gawd soon!).
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> there must be an awful lot of heavyweight younger women out there - time
> was when one seldom put on wieght until of "mature" years.)

I know.  I've been overweight all my life, so I never thought I'd have this
"problem", but I can't find anything in my size in a mature style or for my
height.  I have to look in the "Petite" section, and then everything comes
halfway to my knees and elbows - *and* the fashions are geared towards
teeny-boppers.  "Misses" and "Juniors" usually start at size 7, and "Ladies"
start at a 9!  I can't find anything at all for a 5'5" size 5!

I was watching "What Not to Wear" the other day and they were doing a
make-over for a fairly large woman.  The woman complained that no matter how
much they gave her to spend, she couldn't find anything decent to buy.
Stacy (the lady style guru) agreed and *finally* said something about the
fashions made for "Women" sizes.  She admitted that they're horrible and
designers *really* need to start designing nice things for larger women (who
can *possibly* believe that large floral or paisley, neon-colored prints
would look flattering on *any* woman, much less on a large woman!!??).  Why
can't designers just  devote 1/10th of their line to "normal" women (mature
women of *all* sizes)?  We don't all want to look like an emaciated
20-year-old model walking down a runway with most of her skinny body
sticking out for public view!!!

Hugs,

CatNipped

>> http://www.possibleplaces.com/CatNipped/Lori/
>>
>> Hugs,
>>
>> CatNipped
Jo Firey - 24 May 2005 21:45 GMT
>>> I've been looking for (cheap) suits to give me an Executive Assistant
>>> "image" for (hopefully) any interviews I might get (please gawd soon!).
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
> like an emaciated 20-year-old model walking down a runway with most of her
> skinny body sticking out for public view!!!

I'd love to know where Oprah used to get her clothes!

Jo
Catnipped - 25 May 2005 00:42 GMT
> >>> I've been looking for (cheap) suits to give me an Executive Assistant
> >>> "image" for (hopefully) any interviews I might get (please gawd soon!).
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
>
> Jo

Ha!  With her money she probably even has her panties tailor made!  ;>

Hugs,

CatNipped
Mary - 25 May 2005 17:02 GMT
> > >>> I've been looking for (cheap) suits to give me an Executive Assistant
> > >>> "image" for (hopefully) any interviews I might get (please gawd
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
>
> Ha!  With her money she probably even has her panties tailor made!  ;>

Why not when she gets her hiney tailor made! Or could if she wants to.
Has she had plastic surgery?
EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) - 25 May 2005 19:10 GMT
> I'd love to know where Oprah used to get her clothes!

Well, a lot of budding singers, etc. have their own aspiring
designer, who does their clothes to order, for the publicity
value (and little more than the cost of materials).
badwilson - 25 May 2005 02:50 GMT
>>> I've been looking for (cheap) suits to give me an Executive
>>> Assistant "image" for (hopefully) any interviews I might get
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>> young for the older woman.  (Makes me think that there must be an
>> awful lot of heavyweight younger women out there - time was when
one
>> seldom put on wieght until of "mature" years.)
>
> I know.  I've been overweight all my life, so I never thought I'd
> have this "problem", but I can't find anything in my size in a
mature
> style or for my height.  I have to look in the "Petite" section, and
> then everything comes halfway to my knees and elbows - *and* the
> fashions are geared towards teeny-boppers.  "Misses" and "Juniors"
> usually start at size 7, and "Ladies" start at a 9!  I can't find
> anything at all for a 5'5" size 5!

Want a holiday with shopping in Thailand???  You wouldn't have a
problem finding stuff to fit here.  Well, if it didn't fit it would be
because most stuff would be too *small* and not too large!
But lately I've noticed that Thais are getting bigger.  Must be all
those KFC's and Pizza Huts and Dunkin' Donuts and 7/11's everywhere!!!
Anyway, the sizes seem to be getting a tad bigger.  Sometimes I can
even fit into an L now, not an XL!  Yay!  This makes shopping great
because there's so much more to choose from and the prices here are
really cheap :-)
--
Britta
"There is no snooze button on a cat who wants breakfast." -- Unknown
Check out pictures of Vino at:
http://photos.yahoo.com/badwilson click on the Vino album
EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) - 25 May 2005 19:06 GMT
> I was watching "What Not to Wear" the other day and they were doing a
> make-over for a fairly large woman.  The woman complained that no matter how
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> can *possibly* believe that large floral or paisley, neon-colored prints
> would look flattering on *any* woman, much less on a large woman!!??).

How about shiny leather skirts and pants for anything larger
than a size 10?  (Yet most of the large-size catalogs show
them - of th size 44, for God's sake - the mind boggles!)

And oh, how I WISH they'd abolish the "empire" waist, which
makes even the slimmest woman look pregnant!  ("Real" empire
fashions were gathered tight under the breasts, and pretty
much form-fitting from there down - not particularly
flattering to the large woman, but attractive on her slimmer
sisters.)

>  Why
> can't designers just  devote 1/10th of their line to "normal" women (mature
> women of *all* sizes)?  We don't all want to look like an emaciated
> 20-year-old model walking down a runway with most of her skinny body
> sticking out for public view!!!

Probably because too many women can't really SEE themselves
when they look in a mirror!  While I was still maintaining
my weight, I was often tempted by fashions I used to look
well in when I was younger.  Fortunately, I am able to "see
myself as others see me", and refrained from buying them!
Jo Firey - 24 May 2005 21:44 GMT
>> I've been looking for (cheap) suits to give me an Executive Assistant
>> "image" for (hopefully) any interviews I might get (please gawd soon!).
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> there must be an awful lot of heavyweight younger women out there - time
> was when one seldom put on wieght until of "mature" years.)

That is a stereotype that was never really true.  Especially in a
multiracial world.  And it made life hell for the not so slim younger women.
Aside from those who were never slim, there are a lot of women who are never
thin again after they have their first child.  That said, I do have a hard
time finding clothes suitable to my own age and tastes anymore.

Jo
Mary - 24 May 2005 21:59 GMT
"Jo Firey" <JAfirey@NETZERO.NET> wrote : (Makes me think that
> > there must be an awful lot of heavyweight younger women out there - time
> > was when one seldom put on wieght until of "mature" years.)
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> thin again after they have their first child.  That said, I do have a hard
> time finding clothes suitable to my own age and tastes anymore.

However, as we see in the news every day, Americans are fatter than
ever. There has been an enormous increase in obesity and overweight
in the past ten years, among young people and children. So there are,
indeed, many more fat young women than there used to be. Obesity is
an epidemic.
EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) - 25 May 2005 19:08 GMT
> That is a stereotype that was never really true.  Especially in a
> multiracial world.  And it made life hell for the not so slim younger women.
> Aside from those who were never slim, there are a lot of women who are never
> thin again after they have their first child.  That said, I do have a hard
> time finding clothes suitable to my own age and tastes anymore.

I think Catnipped has it right - everything is designed for
"teeny-boppers", nowadays - whatever the size range!
SuzQ - 25 May 2005 12:55 GMT
Looks great!
Suz&Spicey
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.