Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / Cat Anecdotes / March 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Forensics: Veterinarian blazes medical trail

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Julie Cook - 14 Mar 2005 19:29 GMT
This is an interesting article, that was in ajc.com today, that I
thought might interest some of you.

You can find the article at:
http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/metro/northfulton/0305/13vet.html

Article copied from AJC.com:

Forensics: Veterinarian blazes medical trail
Fulton County vet plays crime detective in cases of animal abuse

By PAUL KAPLAN
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Published on: 03/13/05

The kitten was 8 weeks old, and already it had been to hell and back.
There was blood in its lungs, and one side of its head was smashed.

The young couple that brought the little white Persian to the
veterinarian said it was hurt in a fall from a countertop.

No way, Dr. Melinda Merck said to herself.

First of all, cats are nimble and usually land on all fours. But even if
it had fallen, a 2-pound kitten would not generate enough force to cause
such severe injuries.

As she examined the cat, Merck ruled out the possibility of a car having
hit it because it had no abrasions. As soon as the couple left, she
called animal control.

An officer went to interview the couple, and the young man finally
admitted he'd slammed the kitten into a wall.

That was Merck's first experience in medical sleuthing, back in 1990.
Fifteen years later, she's a leading authority in the emerging field of
animal forensics.

Fulton and Cobb counties bring her in regularly to help investigate and
treat abused and neglected animals. She got the call last month when 205
cats were found inside a house in Alpharetta. All but 26 were dead.

Merck could not have handled a case of that magnitude a decade ago. Back
then, she was teaching herself animal forensics because nobody else was
doing it. It was like fishing off the end of the world.

In those days, even the worst cases of animal abuse could be prosecuted
only as a misdemeanor in Georgia and most other states. As a result,
many prosecutors were uninterested.

Claudine Wilkins, a former Cobb County prosecutor now in private
practice, recalls the time she was visiting a judge in his chambers to
discuss an animal abuse case when he told her: "If I can't sit on it or
eat it, an animal is useless to me."

"That's the mentality we're dealing with," said Wilkins, who does legal
advocacy work for abused animals.

Then, in 2000, the Georgia Legislature passed the state Animal
Protection Act, which turned the worst cases of abuse into felonies.
That changed things.

A nonprofit called Georgia Legal Professionals for Animals was formed,
mainly by volunteer lawyers and paralegals willing to help prosecute
animal abusers. They were badly needed because felony convictions are
harder to win. They require proof of abuse that was "knowingly and
maliciously" com- mitted.

"To reach that higher standard, you need good science," said Randy
Lockwood, vice president of the Humane Society of the United States and
an animal forensics expert. "Dr. Merck and a couple of other people are
on the cutting edge of trying to move that field along."

It's been a slow process, but animal forensics has advanced
significantly since Merck got started. She had to learn by hanging out
with crime scene investigators (CSIs) at human crime scenes and with
coroners during autopsies.

With virtually no animal forensics or legal help back then, it was open
season on animal abuse. When cases were so horrific that charges were
filed, Merck said, "It was just he said/she said."

Now, with forensic specialists involved, it's he said/she presents the
evidence. One reason animal forensics remains in its infancy is that
veterinary schools don't teach it. Merck and Dr. Paige Carmichael, a
pathologist at the University of Georgia Veterinary School, have put
together a proposal to teach a course as an elective at UGA. It would be
the first in the nation.

A growth industry

What has been growing much faster than animal forensics is animal law.

"Eight years ago, when I got out of law school, there weren't any animal
lawyers," Wilkins said. "Now they're all over the place."

A big reason is that more than 20 law schools have courses in animal
law, including Harvard, Lockwood said.

Wilkins predicted that animal forensics will have a similar growth
spiral when vet schools start teaching the course. What the students
will learn is that there are similarities between human and animal
forensics. The study of bullet trajectories and stab wound angles are
similar in both, for example.

And there are major differences. Animals have completely different blood
types than humans, and they don't bruise externally like humans do
because their skin is built for life in the wild and for fighting. The
biggest difference is that there's only one human species compared with
countless animal species. As the species change, so do the forensics.

That's fine with Merck.

"I like challenges," she said. "I like puzzles."

She also likes animals, of course, and is not shy about it. The bumper
sticker on the back of her Lexus says "I (heart) cats" and her cellphone
ring is the theme from "The Pink Panther."

Animals, Merck said, "don't give you grief, they return affection, and
they listen well." She gives the love right back by helping the
authorities make cases against people who intentionally hurt animals.
She just might be a dog's best friend.

When she was growing up in Lubbock, Texas, Merck would bring home
injured cats and birds, "much to my parents' dismay."

Now she's a veteran of the animal abuse wars who recalls horrible cases
in a detached clinical monotone, as if she were dictating the list of
wounds to a tape recorder. But suddenly she'll pause in midsentence and
become teary-eyed. She'll turn away reflexively, reach into her purse
for a Marlboro Ultra Light, and fire it up. Then she'll turn back and
calmly resume the monotone.

"We deal with very sad cases, very nasty things done by very violent
people," Lockwood said. "Melinda offers a good blend of the heart and
the head. She gets emotionally involved in the issues but doesn't let
that disable her."

Abuse breeds abuse

Since she started working in forensics, Merck has come across animals
that had been shot, beaten, burned, skinned, stabbed and sexually
assaulted. What possesses someone to do that sort of work?

The obvious reason is not the initial one that people like Merck and
Lockwood cite. Yes, they care about animals, but first, they say, they
care about humans.

Study after study has shown that people who abuse animals are much more
likely to later abuse humans. The connection between animal cruelty and
child abuse is especially clear-cut.

"One out of every five cases of animal abuse typically had a domestic
abuse or child abuse case attached to it," said Wilkins, the former Cobb
prosecutor. "Whenever we got a case of animal abuse we asked if there
were small children in the home. If there were, [the Department of
Family and Children's Services] was called in."

Children and pets can't defend themselves, so they're easy marks for
abusers, the wide majority of whom are males. They often hurt a pet to
control their wife or female partner, experts say. A study at a shelter
for battered women in Utah found that more than 70 percent of their
partners had threatened, hurt or killed a family pet.

Serial murderers typically start out as animal abusers, studies have
found. From the Boston Strangler to Jeffrey Dahmer and many of the
big-time killers in between, early animal abuse was a common thread.

The house of dead cats

When Merck was summoned to the house in Alpharetta with 179 dead cats,
she took note of the investigative team on the scene. There were police
investigators, animal control officers, a county prosecutor and police
officers to secure the site.

"It was just like a regular crime scene," Merck said. "It was like 'CSI'
and 'Law & Order' and 'Third Watch' all in one. Everyone who should have
been there was there."

To Merck, that spoke volumes about how far the movement to protect
animals has come.

Animal hoarding, as the Alpharetta situation is called, is different
from traditional abuse cases. The devastation comes from neglect instead
of violence. And whereas animal cruelty is almost always done by males,
hoarding is usually done by females. In the Alpharetta case, homeowner
Lauri Lockwood, 45, has been charged with aggravated cruelty to animals
— a felony punishable by up to five years in prison and $15,000 in
fines. Other charges are possible after evidence is presented to the
grand jury.

Hoarding has become "extremely common," said the Humane Society's
Lockwood (no relation to the suspect). "We see 5,000 to 7,000 new cases
each year." The worst he's seen had more than 1,000 animals at one
residence.

Lockwood said he considers animal hoarding a form of mental illness.
Merck thinks it's "too complex to just say, 'They're crazy' " In any
case, she does not think neglect is less of a crime than violence.

"What's more horrific," she said, "someone who shoots a dog or someone
who starves a dog over several months?"

After she completed her CSI work in Alpharetta, Merck took the 26
surviving cats back to her clinic. All are improving, she said.

Meanwhile, Fulton County Animal Services is busy arranging adoptions —
screening applicants, accepting letters of recommendation, even visiting
prospective homes.

"They're making people who want to adopt them jump through hoops because
of what these cats have been through," Merck said. "They want to make
sure they'll never be traumatized again."
Kreisleriana - 14 Mar 2005 19:55 GMT
>This is an interesting article, that was in ajc.com today, that I
>thought might interest some of you.
>
>You can find the article at:
>http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/metro/northfulton/0305/13vet.html

Thank you for posting this.  I am always glad to see it when someone
somewhere smartens up about cruelty to animals, and understands that
it co-exists with, or is the first step towards, abominable cruelty to
humans.  

Theresa
Stinky Pictures: http://community.webshots.com/album/125591586JWEFwh
My Blog: http://www.humanitas.blogspot.com
jmcquown - 14 Mar 2005 20:25 GMT
>> This is an interesting article, that was in ajc.com today, that I
>> thought might interest some of you.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Stinky Pictures: http://community.webshots.com/album/125591586JWEFwh
> My Blog: http://www.humanitas.blogspot.com

I am ashamed to say this.  No, let this be a lesson to people.  My
ex-husband (divorced 21 years ago, thank Bast) got angry at our puppy for
pooping on the floor and he hit him and then flung him onto the cement
balcony where he'd constructed sort of an enclosure for him.  A few minutes
later he was yelling, "Jill!  Something's wrong with Sampson!"  He made me
drive him with the dog to the emergency vet without me even getting my
glasses.  I'm blind as a bat and there I was driving in the dark unable to
see.  The man examining him said, "Oh my, was he hit by a car?"  My husband
said, "Yes!"  I was so pissed, I said, "Oh no, he wasn't!  You hit him and
threw him down on the pavement because he pooped on the carpet!"  My ex was
appropriately ashamed.  After we got home he made an excuse, left and didn't
come back for 48 hours.  As far as I'm concerned he should *never* have come
back.  I got the dog in the property settlement.

Jill
Monique Y. Mudama - 14 Mar 2005 20:47 GMT
> I am ashamed to say this.  No, let this be a lesson to people.  My
> ex-husband (divorced 21 years ago, thank Bast) got angry at our puppy for
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Jill

Poor Sampson!  Poor you!

Reading this story, I have to wonder, were you afraid your ex would retaliate
for telling the truth?

I remember one time when my ex got angry at a computer game and punched his
keyboard so hard that he broke it (and nearly broke his hand).  It upset me so
much that I was crying and truly scared, especially when I saw the expression
on his face.  We didn't last much longer.  He never raised a hand to me, but
after that experience I never quite trusted him.

Since then, I've punched a door (also angry at a computer game) myself, and I
wonder how I could have such a negative reaction to others' violence when I
did the same thing myself.  It's not logical or fair.  Is breaking an object
an acceptable way to vent anger, or is it one step on the way to letting loose
on people?  I think it's a bad thing, but I've spoken to other people who
think it's normal.

Signature

monique, who spoils Oscar unmercifully

pictures: http://www.bounceswoosh.org/rpca

jmcquown - 14 Mar 2005 21:25 GMT
>> I am ashamed to say this.  No, let this be a lesson to people.  My
>> ex-husband (divorced 21 years ago, thank Bast) got angry at our
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Poor Sampson!  Poor you!

Thanks.  The pup was okay but he had contusions and a little internal
bleeding.  They kept him a couple of days.  Sampson lived to be nearly 18
under my loving care :)

> Reading this story, I have to wonder, were you afraid your ex would
> retaliate for telling the truth?

I was, but I was so angry he'd hurt a defenseless puppy for doing what
not-yet-housebroken puppies do - poop - I didn't care at that point.  No way
could he hit me in front of the vet tech and he was so ashamed it didn't
even occur to him to seek revenge.

> I remember one time when my ex got angry at a computer game and
> punched his keyboard so hard that he broke it (and nearly broke his
> hand).  It upset me so much that I was crying and truly scared,
> especially when I saw the expression on his face.  We didn't last
> much longer.  He never raised a hand to me, but after that experience
> I never quite trusted him.

My ex-husband never actually hit me.  He was good at slamming things around
and yelling.  And lying.  The night I left him he knocked over a bookcase
which prompted the downstairs neighbor to call the cops; she thought he was
killing me.  The police pulled up just after I'd gathered some of my things
and the dog and he'd agreed to drive me to my parents house.  I explained to
the police we'd had a fight and he was driving me and requested they follow
if they could.  They could and they did.  I think they appreciated the fact
that I wasn't making excuses for him... my tear-stained face must have been
a dead giveaway.

> Since then, I've punched a door (also angry at a computer game)
> myself, and I wonder how I could have such a negative reaction to
> others' violence when I did the same thing myself.  It's not logical
> or fair.  Is breaking an object an acceptable way to vent anger, or
> is it one step on the way to letting loose on people?  I think it's a
> bad thing, but I've spoken to other people who think it's normal.

I don't know that it's normal to break objects in order to vent anger.  When
I worked in a restaurant years ago I'd go into the walk-in cooler, shut the
door and yell!  (They are pretty much sound-proof.)  Then I'd go back and
wait on the annoying as heck customer who had tripped my trigger :)  Grab a
pillow and yell into it rather than hurt your hand on a hard object.  Or hug
Oscar until your blood pressure goes down.

NOTE:  2 years after the divorce I had my ex-husband imprisoned for stalking
and threatening me, harrassing phone calls at work, threatening my
co-workers and vandalizing my car.

Jill
hobbs - 16 Mar 2005 12:06 GMT
Years ago my husband was really angry at something, I forget what after all
these years, but he put his fist through the kitchen wall, fortunately
it was an inside wall so it was probably plasterboard, or he would have
broken his hand, but once when we were first married I was sweeping the
hearthwith the little hearth brush and shovel and we were arguing
about something I was on my haunches and he poked me in the shoulder
knocking me over as I was unbalanced and I let fly with the brush, it hit
him on the forehead and brought blood I thinkit floored him cause he just
pointed to the blood and said look what you've done to me. It stopped the
argument anyway.    Jean.P.

> > I am ashamed to say this.  No, let this be a lesson to people.  My
> > ex-husband (divorced 21 years ago, thank Bast) got angry at our puppy for
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>
> pictures: http://www.bounceswoosh.org/rpca
Christina Websell - 17 Mar 2005 03:44 GMT
> Years ago my husband was really angry at something, I forget what after
> all
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> pointed to the blood and said look what you've done to me. It stopped the
> argument anyway.    Jean.P.

I am always saddened to hear that violent husbands can cause a wife to
retaliate in that way.  What I mean is:  stop abusing your wife!!  What's
that about?  Power?

Tweed
Christina Websell - 17 Mar 2005 03:18 GMT
>> I am ashamed to say this.  No, let this be a lesson to people.  My
>> ex-husband (divorced 21 years ago, thank Bast) got angry at our puppy for
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
> on people?  I think it's a bad thing, but I've spoken to other people who
> think it's normal.

I don't think it's normal to get so angry at a computer game that you punch
a door. Apart from the fact that you might hurt yourself, you are damaging
your house.  Take an anger management course and in the meantime, throw a
cushion on the floor and jump on it when you get angry about trivial things
like this.
Save your real anger for something that's really important.

Tweed
Monique Y. Mudama - 17 Mar 2005 06:27 GMT
>> Since then, I've punched a door (also angry at a computer game) myself, and
>> I wonder how I could have such a negative reaction to others' violence when
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> cushion on the floor and jump on it when you get angry about trivial things
> like this.  Save your real anger for something that's really important.

I honestly don't feel I need an anger management course.  What I described
happened more than four years ago, at a time when game addiction and
depression were feeding off of each other in scary ways, and I was in a
constant state of sleep deprivation.  

I've tried punching pillows or jumping on cushions, and it just doesn't do it
for me.  There's not enough resistance.  Actually, the best way I've found to
channel anger is to do my martial arts forms.  Forms are great because you can
do them with great intensity without ever actually touching a target.  They
need a fairly large amount of space, though.  They're also cool because you
can kiyop (yell from the belly) loudly.

I also have a punching bag, but I've never used it when angry; I only use it
to work off extra energy.

I feel a need to proactively defend martial arts here, because I want to make
clear that there's no connection whatsoever between anger and martial arts in
my mind.  Martial arts are a great way to channel energy of any sort; I find
the discipline and familiarity of forms to be a great way to crowd out the
anger with concentration, if that makes any sense.  They put me in almost a
meditative state.  Martial arts actually has made me less violent.  When I was
a teenager, I would "jokingly" punch male friends in the shoulder.  Dad kept
saying that one of these days, someone would get annoyed and punch me right
back.  Well, that never happened, but I think on some level, I never thought I
could actually hurt someone until I took martial arts.  Once I began training,
I realized what I could do to someone, and once I realized that I stopped my
"friendly" punching.

When I was really angry/upset, I used to go drive.  I don't do that anymore;
I'm sure that it's just as dangerous as driving drunk or high.

Signature

monique, who spoils Oscar unmercifully

pictures: http://www.bounceswoosh.org/rpca

Christina Websell - 17 Mar 2005 03:10 GMT
>>> This is an interesting article, that was in ajc.com today, that I
>>> thought might interest some of you.
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
> Jill

Been there, Jill.  My husband once grabbed up one of my whippets, Daisy,
whose only crime was to come in from the kitchen smiling and flung her
across the room.  When I immediately came to her defence, he started on me.
This is just to say I understand.  It isn't something I want to discuss, I
am trying to put it all behind me.  The main problem was alcohol and he is
dead now so we're all safe.

Tweed
hobbs - 16 Mar 2005 12:07 GMT
Sorry the page was unavailable I'll have to read the posts to see if I can
get the information that way   Jean.P.

> >This is an interesting article, that was in ajc.com today, that I
> >thought might interest some of you.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Stinky Pictures: http://community.webshots.com/album/125591586JWEFwh
> My Blog: http://www.humanitas.blogspot.com
dorothy - 15 Mar 2005 00:12 GMT
> This is an interesting article, that was in ajc.com today, that I
> thought might interest some of you.
>
> You can find the article at:
> http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/metro/northfulton/0305/13vet.html

This is fantastic news!  It's about time legislators began to take
animal abuse and neglect seriously.  These poor, defenseless animals
deserve as much of a voice as we can give them.  And kudos to those
lawyers who are working as animal advocates!  Gives me hope about the
lot of them (just kidding, no offense to any lawyers out there  ;-)  I
am just so happy to see this and I hope this spreads quickly to the
rest of the nation.  Maybe someday we'll see declawing outlawed as a
result?  

Kerrie
hobbs - 16 Mar 2005 12:22 GMT
I just saw on the news tonight {I only caught the tail end, but someone may
have caught it all,} that a man who had been given a prison sentence for
cruelty to a kitten and then run over it with a 4 wheel drive, had his
sentence commuted to commumity service, and we all saw what that was
on the today tonight show, a blasted holiday!I'd like to meet some of these
so called judges,they couldn't even judge a baby competition. It makes
me so mad!!!!!!        Jean.P.

> > This is an interesting article, that was in ajc.com today, that I
> > thought might interest some of you.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Kerrie
KellyH - 15 Mar 2005 00:42 GMT
I had to skim most of the article, just too emotional right now.  Just want
to say, good for her!  I'm glad someone is out there sticking up for the
animals and taking animal cruelty seriously.

Signature

-Kelly
kelly at farringtons dot net
"Wake up, and smell the cat food" -TMBG

> This is an interesting article, that was in ajc.com today, that I thought
> might interest some of you.
[quoted text clipped - 208 lines]
> of what these cats have been through," Merck said. "They want to make sure
> they'll never be traumatized again."
Melissa Houle - 15 Mar 2005 04:06 GMT
Yes indeed, good for her! I'm glad the guy responsible was induced to admit
it.  And that Animal Forensics are becoming more respectable in legal
circles. (That poor little kitten...=o(  I hope it found a better home after
it was well.)

Melissa

> I had to skim most of the article, just too emotional right now.  Just want
> to say, good for her!  I'm glad someone is out there sticking up for the
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> kelly at farringtons dot net
> "Wake up, and smell the cat food" -TMBG

SNIp
Adrian - 16 Mar 2005 16:11 GMT
> This is an interesting article, that was in ajc.com today, that I
> thought might interest some of you.
>
> You can find the article at:
> http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/metro/northfulton/0305/13vet.html
<snip>

This world needs more people like Dr. Melinda Merck.
Signature

Adrian (Owned by Snoopy & Bagheera)
A house is not a home, without a cat.


Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.