Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / Cat Anecdotes / January 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

(OT)  Disaster Relief... Attention Canadians

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Mathew Kagis - 30 Dec 2004 19:56 GMT
To all Canadians:
The Canadian military has a unit known as D.A.R.T. (Disaster Assistance
Response Team).  As the name suggests, they are a rapid deployment group
with: Doctors, SAR Techs, water purification teams, mobile kitchens &
shelters.  In short, everything that SE Asia currently needs.

They are still on the ground in Canada, while Our Minister of National
Defence, Bill Graham sends observers to the affected area to 'a.ses the
situation'.  Hmmm, thousands will die from drinking contaminated water, we
have water purification teams ready to go.... You can see how this would be
a complex decision for him...

:-(

I URGE all Canadians to e-mail Mr. Graham ( Graham.B@parl.gc.ca )  And ask
him why the D.A.R.T. unit is still cooling it's heels in Canada.  Mabey if
we light a big enough fire under his a.s, he'll let them go do what they're
trained & ready to do.

Thanks
Signature

Mathew
En Vino Veritas

Napoleon@myeweb.com - 31 Dec 2004 08:47 GMT
> To all Canadians:
>  The Canadian military has a unit known as D.A.R.T. (Disaster Assistance
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Thanks
Susan M - 31 Dec 2004 17:40 GMT
Yes - I heard him on the news.  Said they wanted to be asked or some such
thing.  That it was an "elite" force not suitable for all circumstances.
125,000 dead people and massive devastation doesn't seem to be an
appropriate use?  I suspect that we don't have the planes to fly them over.
I am concentrating my donations on NGO's.

Susan M
Otis and Chester

> To all Canadians:
> The Canadian military has a unit known as D.A.R.T. (Disaster Assistance
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Thanks
Bill Stock - 31 Dec 2004 17:43 GMT
> Yes - I heard him on the news.  Said they wanted to be asked or some such
> thing.  That it was an "elite" force not suitable for all circumstances.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Susan M
> Otis and Chester

Yep, I suspect it's the planes. We usually have to charter planes or rely on
the Americans to get our cargo anywhere. Sad.

>> To all Canadians:
>> The Canadian military has a unit known as D.A.R.T. (Disaster Assistance
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>>
>> Thanks
Mathew Kagis - 31 Dec 2004 18:38 GMT
> > Yes - I heard him on the news.  Said they wanted to be asked or some such
> > thing.  That it was an "elite" force not suitable for all circumstances.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Yep, I suspect it's the planes. We usually have to charter planes or rely on
> the Americans to get our cargo anywhere. Sad.

.... Apparenty you are right. A Co-worker told me, that he saw a little news
blurb on it on CBC.  Our 'rapid deployment' team, requires Russian Anitolov
aircraft to move them around...  Bloody Typical.
   Anyway, please still e-mail our Defence Minister, bug him about why our
'rapid' deployment team, can't rapidly deploy itself... & Give generously to
the NGO of your choice....
Signature

Mathew
Butler to 2 kittens: Chablis & Muscat
En Vino Veritas

Karen Chuplis - 31 Dec 2004 18:53 GMT
>>> Yes - I heard him on the news.  Said they wanted to be asked or some
> such
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> 'rapid' deployment team, can't rapidly deploy itself... & Give generously to
> the NGO of your choice....

I would think that would be of great concern to Canadians as they could not
be rapidly deployed even in your own country should the need arise!
lewe - 01 Jan 2005 18:08 GMT
> "Bill Stock" <Me7@Privacy.net> wrote in message
> > Yep, I suspect it's the planes. We usually have to charter planes or rely
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> blurb on it on CBC.  Our 'rapid deployment' team, requires Russian Anitolov
> aircraft to move them around...  Bloody Typical

seems like those large enough planes, and planes that can take the really
long distances,are in great demand all over for all types of transport.

One of those Russian planes are taking off from Sweden right now, bringing
more freeze containers and coffins to Thailand, in addition to some sent
already.

Other plane problems here concerned transporting the more hurt survivors who
could not take the trip back to Sweden sitting. The planes available here
that could be modified with stretchers, MD 80s, need several stops and more
than 20 hrs for a one way trip.

:: lewe
-------------------------------------------------------------
lewemi at yahoo dot se || cat pics: photos.yahoo.com/lewemi
Christina Websell - 01 Jan 2005 03:49 GMT
> Yes - I heard him on the news.  Said they wanted to be asked or some such
> thing.  That it was an "elite" force not suitable for all circumstances.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Susan M
> Otis and Chester

Canada has no aeroplanes???  I think not. Try harder, I say.

Tweed
Bill Stock - 01 Jan 2005 04:21 GMT
>> Yes - I heard him on the news.  Said they wanted to be asked or some such
>> thing.  That it was an "elite" force not suitable for all circumstances.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Tweed

The rubber band has broken and we're still waiting for the replacement. But
we don't want any UK rubbers, after the sub incident.
Jo Firey - 01 Jan 2005 08:50 GMT
>> Yes - I heard him on the news.  Said they wanted to be asked or some such
>> thing.  That it was an "elite" force not suitable for all circumstances.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Tweed

I know my two cousins who flew for the Canadian Air Force were missed when
they retired, but this is ridiculous.
Cheryl Perkins - 01 Jan 2005 12:39 GMT
> Canada has no aeroplanes???  I think not. Try harder, I say.

The government doesn't have ones big enough to transport the equipment
this team uses. They need to either borrow them from allies, or rent them.
Right now, every other country that wants to transport such large amounts
to the devastated area is also trying to rent the same small number of
superlarge airplanes. Moreover, there are bottlenecks at the few (or
only??) airports in the area where these monster planes can land.

I'm not convinced that sending that team in right now is necessarily the
best use of the money. That doesn't mean I'm letting my government off the
hook for their cutbacks in military spending, especially those involving
helicopters, which are of far wider utility than oversized cargo planes.

Signature

Cheryl

Ian Hayward - 31 Dec 2004 19:57 GMT
Well, this Canadian living in England has just emailed the political head of
our DND, prompted not least by the extraordinary and unprecedented response
of the sometimes insular and xenophobic British public.  ?45 million raised
already from public donations, to which another ?50m will be added by the UK
government.  Newsreel footage of aid flying out yesterday (mostly in Russian
Antonovs for some obscure reason) must have helped, and the usually
sensationalist and trivia-obsessed press are genuinely getting behind the
effort.  Well done, UK.  Come on Canada.  The debt moratorium is a start,
but as you rightly say, Mathew, it won't provide drinking water tomorrow.
May I offer another suggestion, perhaps Utopian, but not unreasonable, that
all shareholders and major customers urge the multi-national oil companies
to pledge that all aviation, marine and road fuel used in the relief effort
will be provided for free?  I can't provide any useful links, but those of
us who qualify should not have too much trouble making ourselves heard.

A Happy New Year to you all,

Ian

> To all Canadians:
>  The Canadian military has a unit known as D.A.R.T. (Disaster Assistance
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Thanks
Zythophile - 01 Jan 2005 01:27 GMT
It's difficult for a xenophobic Brit like myself to say this, but
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/4138763.stm - Thank you USA,
you have risen to the challenge. I salute you.
Signature

Z
51? 37' 23" N,  3? 56' 27" W

Mary - 01 Jan 2005 03:38 GMT
> It's difficult for a xenophobic Brit like myself to say this, but
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/4138763.stm - Thank you USA,
> you have risen to the challenge. I salute you.

Z--

Every now and then we do something right. Thanks for
acknowledging it.

(I am not one of those simpering softies but I actually
boo-hooed out of the blue today watching a CNN
report about the tsunami. It is too horrible, too tragic
to really grasp.)
Annie Wxill - 01 Jan 2005 20:22 GMT
> It's difficult for a xenophobic Brit like myself to say this, but
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/4138763.stm - Thank you USA,
> you have risen to the challenge. I salute you.

Thank you for the kind words.  I have read of several other countries
stepping up to the plate, but I have not yet seen anything about
contributions from the oil-rich awash in cash countries such as Saudi Arabia
and Kuwait or from China, with its booming economy.  I don't know if that is
because of a bias of our U.S. news sources or because they have not chosen
to join in.  I'm watching for a response from the U.N. as well.
Has anyone seen any reports regarding these countries and that organization?
My heart goes out to the victims and the survivors of this terrible event.
I'm gratified to see the U.S. take a large part in the recovery.
Annie
Karen Chuplis - 01 Jan 2005 21:01 GMT
>> It's difficult for a xenophobic Brit like myself to say this, but
>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/4138763.stm - Thank you USA,
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> I'm gratified to see the U.S. take a large part in the recovery.
> Annie

I know they've pledged some and I know that Dubai Crown Prince Sheikh
Mohammed bin Rashid al Maktoum has ordered a delegation from the Mohammed
bin Rashid al Maktoum Charitable and Humanitarian Foundation to Thailand to
assist. Now how much that includes, I don't know. I found that out from the
racing trades. Also racing Magnate Frank Stronach has donated $100,000 to
the Canadian Red Cross and for one week, beginning on Friday, Ashford Stud
in Kentucky, Coolmore Australia, and Coolmore Stud in Ireland will accept
bids for nominations to each of their stallions, including Sadler¹s Wells in
Ireland, Fusaichi Pegasus in Kentucky, and Encosta de Lago in Australian
with all proceeds to go to the tsunami victims which should pull in a good
bit.
Cheryl - 01 Jan 2005 21:03 GMT
> Thank you for the kind words.  I have read of several other
> countries stepping up to the plate, but I have not yet seen
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> of this terrible event. I'm gratified to see the U.S. take a
> large part in the recovery.

I heard that the first contribution amounts from us were low
because it wasn't yet apparent the sheer amount of damage and loss
of life. I'm also glad it went up to 350M. I heard today that Japan
has contributed the largest single donation from a country - $500M.
My heart goes out to them, too, and I just can't listen to some of
the news reports anymore. Kripes, now they're reporting that some
tourists are sunbathing on the beaches again rather than pitching
in to help cleanup. Argggg..

Signature

Cheryl

Karen Chuplis - 01 Jan 2005 22:02 GMT
>> Thank you for the kind words.  I have read of several other
>> countries stepping up to the plate, but I have not yet seen
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> tourists are sunbathing on the beaches again rather than pitching
> in to help cleanup. Argggg..

But the Thais want and need that. THey are desparately afraid people will
stop coming and that is their main industry so it will cost them even more
if they lose that industry (height of the season) and those resorts are not
damaged. Some of their sites are pleading to please change your reservations
to another resort if you were scheduled for one of the ones that were
damaged or destroyed. I think it would be very hard, but the locals depend
upon the tourist industry.
Christina Websell - 01 Jan 2005 22:36 GMT
>>> Thank you for the kind words.  I have read of several other
>>> countries stepping up to the plate, but I have not yet seen
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> damaged or destroyed. I think it would be very hard, but the locals depend
> upon the tourist industry.

I understand that completely.  They *do* rely on the tourist industry.  I'm
sorry about this but I wouldn't put my life on the line to support their
tourist industry just now.  Not for about two years actually.  Even then it
would be unlikely.  To be realistic, their tourist trade will be gone for a
long time.
Would you fly out to one of the affected countries tomorrow for a holiday?
I wouldn't.
Call me chicken if you want.

Tweed
badwilson - 02 Jan 2005 02:29 GMT
> >>> Thank you for the kind words.  I have read of several other
> >>> countries stepping up to the plate, but I have not yet seen
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
> I wouldn't.
> Call me chicken if you want.

Why?  Because you think it would happen again?  I highly doubt that.
It would not happen again in the same place.  And what's the point in
waiting for 2 years, it could happen after that too.  It could happen
anywhere, any time.  The only way to be safe is to never go anywhere.
But then you could have a major earthquake right by your house too!
I know how much Thailand relies on tourism.  I have lived here for 4
years.  But I still think it's awful for people to lounge on the
beaches that are close by to where the damage is.  I think they should
go to resorts on the other coast and let the rebuilding begin.  I know
Thais and I'm sure that they will have it all fixed up by next year
and I know tourists will come back.  It's too great of a country to
stay away :-)
Adrian - 02 Jan 2005 18:03 GMT
> Why?  Because you think it would happen again?  I highly doubt that.
> It would not happen again in the same place.  And what's the point in
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> and I know tourists will come back.  It's too great of a country to
> stay away :-)

I think the really awfull thing is the reports of some tourist
complaining about the service since the tsunami.
Signature

Adrian (Owned by Snoopy & Bagheera)
A house is not a home, without a cat.

badwilson - 03 Jan 2005 02:22 GMT
> > Why?  Because you think it would happen again?  I highly doubt that.
> > It would not happen again in the same place.  And what's the point in
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> I think the really awfull thing is the reports of some tourist
> complaining about the service since the tsunami.

Seriously???  That's horrible!  It's bad enough that they are lying on
the beach right near where they are still cleaning up bodies, but to
complain about the service is downright evil.
I don't want the tourism industry ruined in Thailand and I think
tourists should continue to come, but there are plenty of unaffected
areas that are not close to the disaster zone where people can go.  If
they want to go right to the disaster zone, they should be helping
out, not lounging.
--
Britta
Sandpaper kisses, a cuddle and a purr. I have an alarm clock that's
covered in fur!
Check out pictures of Vino at:
http://photos.yahoo.com/badwilson click on the Vino album
Yoj - 03 Jan 2005 23:36 GMT
> > > Why?  Because you think it would happen again?  I highly doubt
> that.
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
> --
> Britta

I agree completely!

Joy
Adrian - 02 Jan 2005 18:00 GMT
> Call me chicken if you want.
>
> Tweed

No, we just call you the chicken lady. ;-)
Signature

Adrian (Owned by Snoopy & Bagheera)
A house is not a home, without a cat.

Cheryl - 01 Jan 2005 22:37 GMT
> But the Thais want and need that. THey are desparately afraid
> people will stop coming and that is their main industry so it
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> damaged or destroyed. I think it would be very hard, but the
> locals depend upon the tourist industry.

The news story said the complaints about tourists not helping came
directly from the victims.

Signature

Cheryl

Cheryl Perkins - 02 Jan 2005 01:18 GMT
> The news story said the complaints about tourists not helping came
> directly from the victims.

I'm always a little reluctant to generalize on the basis of a single, or
even a few, media reports. I never know how many people - victims, in this
case - were interviewed, what they were asked, and how the choice was made
of which ones to include. There may well have been victims expressing
every opinion, from wanting the foreigners to help to wanting them to stay
and employ people who have lost everything.

For all I know, those 'tourists' might have been relief workers taking a
break - or people who have no useful skills, not even the ability to
speak the local language, who can't get out and who are nervous about
being indoors.

I tend to be a bit cynical and suspicious about media reports that aren't
strictly factual, as in 'I saw a plane land and I was told it carried
relief supplies' or 'One person I asked really resented those tourists
lying about'.

Signature

Cheryl

Cheryl - 02 Jan 2005 03:27 GMT
> I'm always a little reluctant to generalize on the basis of a
> single, or even a few, media reports. I never know how many
> people - victims, in this case - were interviewed, what they
> were asked, and how the choice was made of which ones to include

I know, Cheryl. That was my whole point, that I don't even like
listening to the news updates anymore. The media come up with stories
like this just to report on something. Any something.

Signature

Cheryl

Cheryl Perkins - 02 Jan 2005 12:59 GMT
> I know, Cheryl. That was my whole point, that I don't even like
> listening to the news updates anymore. The media come up with stories
> like this just to report on something. Any something.

I guess I should have read what you wrote more carefully. I certainly
agree with you on that.

Signature

Cheryl

Mathew Kagis - 01 Jan 2005 21:30 GMT
> > It's difficult for a xenophobic Brit like myself to say this, but
> > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/4138763.stm - Thank you USA,
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> I'm gratified to see the U.S. take a large part in the recovery.
> Annie

I heard on the news that Shrub & Kofi Annan have had a meeting. The UN (as
ineficient as they are)  Are currently working on co-ordinating their relief
efforts with the various Govt. forces & NGOs allready arriving in the
reigon.

Signature

Mathew
Butler to 2 kittens: Chablis & Muscat
En Vino Veritas

Annie Wxill - 02 Jan 2005 17:18 GMT
> I heard on the news that Shrub & Kofi Annan have had a meeting. The UN (as
> ineficient as they are)  Are currently working on co-ordinating their
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Butler to 2 kittens: Chablis & Muscat
> En Vino Veritas

It's good to read that this really is a world-wide effort to send relief.
I guess it's asking too much for world leaders (including my country, the
U.S.) to realize that having worked together on this tragedy, they actually
could work together for other positive outcomes wherever people are
suffering.
Annie
Cheryl Perkins - 01 Jan 2005 21:43 GMT
> to join in.  I'm watching for a response from the U.N. as well.
> Has anyone seen any reports regarding these countries and that organization?
> My heart goes out to the victims and the survivors of this terrible event.
> I'm gratified to see the U.S. take a large part in the recovery.
> Annie

I know the UN is already in action. There was some concern as to whether
the new US-led committee would be just adding another layer of bureaucracy
to the already-existing and already active UN procedures for dealing with
logistics. A Canadian government spokesperson assured the media that this
new group would be working *with* the UN, not duplicating their efforts,
or slowing things down.

I haven't heard about the other countries you mentioned, but I get the
impression that everyone is helping - the reporters aren't listing
specific countries, but saying things lik 'aid pouring in from around the
world'. Unfortunately, they are also reporting on the difficulties of
actually getting aid in when most of the infrastructure is destroyed and
in some areas most of the local government officials, who would normally
be in charge of organizing things and who would have invaluable local
information, are dead or missing.

Signature

Cheryl

Christina Websell - 01 Jan 2005 22:23 GMT
>> It's difficult for a xenophobic Brit like myself to say this, but
>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/4138763.stm - Thank you
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> I'm gratified to see the U.S. take a large part in the recovery.
> Annie

I haven't seen anything on the news about aid offered by the countries you
mention, but it probably wouldn't be mentioned in the UK, anyway.  We are
kept aware of what other European countries are contributing, and also the
USA.
Even though our Govt has upped the ante, the British public have beaten them
again by today.
I'm proud.  I hope it might shame the government to give even more,
particularly in the person-power department, they seem to be short of that
right now.

Tweed  <-- so lucky to be safe
Marina - 02 Jan 2005 05:17 GMT
> I haven't seen anything on the news about aid offered by the countries you
> mention, but it probably wouldn't be mentioned in the UK, anyway.  We are
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> particularly in the person-power department, they seem to be short of that
> right now.

Finns have also donated more privately than our government. The news
told about one person donating 350,000 euros (about 474,000 USD).

In her traditional new year's speech on TV, our president didn't speak
of anything else but the catastrophe. Usually, the president's new
year's speech lists things that happened in the past year and what is
going to happen in the new year. We had a day of mourning here in
Finland yesterday, with flags at half-mast all day.

Signature

Marina, Frank and Nikki
marina (dot) kurten (at) pp (dot) inet (dot) fi
Pics at http://uk.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/frankiennikki/
and http://community.webshots.com/user/frankiennikki

Cheryl Perkins - 02 Jan 2005 12:44 GMT
> Finns have also donated more privately than our government. The news
> told about one person donating 350,000 euros (about 474,000 USD).

> In her traditional new year's speech on TV, our president didn't speak
> of anything else but the catastrophe. Usually, the president's new
> year's speech lists things that happened in the past year and what is
> going to happen in the new year. We had a day of mourning here in
> Finland yesterday, with flags at half-mast all day.

Maybe it was pre-recorded. The announcer said our equivalents (the
Governor-General and Prime Minister's New Year messages) were
pre-recorded, but it still seemed kind of odd not to have a message of
sympathy included, although I knew the reason. Of course, separate
official messages had been made.

Signature

Cheryl

Marina - 02 Jan 2005 18:05 GMT
>>Finns have also donated more privately than our government. The news
>>told about one person donating 350,000 euros (about 474,000 USD).
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> sympathy included, although I knew the reason. Of course, separate
> official messages had been made.

Umm, what I said was, she only spoke of the catastrophe, and nothing
else. She also extended her condolences to everyone who lost someone
close to them.

Signature

Marina, Frank and Nikki
marina (dot) kurten (at) pp (dot) inet (dot) fi
Pics at http://uk.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/frankiennikki/
and http://community.webshots.com/user/frankiennikki

Cheryl Perkins - 02 Jan 2005 01:10 GMT
> Thank you for the kind words.  I have read of several other countries
> stepping up to the plate, but I have not yet seen anything about
> contributions from the oil-rich awash in cash countries such as Saudi Arabia
> and Kuwait or from China, with its booming economy.

By coincidence, the latest radio news in Canada reported on an interview
with a doctor with a Chinese field hospital which is one of the first to
actually get set up where needed, so China is certainly contributing. The
rest of the report was on the difficulties in getting aid where needed,a
report on a miraculous survival of one victim, and reports that some sales
of food have begun, at least in one major city, Banda Ache  (not sure of
the spelling).

Signature

Cheryl

badwilson - 02 Jan 2005 02:31 GMT
> > It's difficult for a xenophobic Brit like myself to say this, but
> > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/4138763.stm - Thank you USA,
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> I'm gratified to see the U.S. take a large part in the recovery.
> Annie

I thought I saw on CNN Asia that China is donating 60 million.  This
was a few days ago.
--
Britta
Sandpaper kisses, a cuddle and a purr. I have an alarm clock that's
covered in fur!
Check out pictures of Vino at:
http://photos.yahoo.com/badwilson click on the Vino album
Annie Wxill - 02 Jan 2005 17:20 GMT
> I thought I saw on CNN Asia that China is donating 60 million.  This
> was a few days ago.
> --
> Britta

Thank you for your input and for a regional point of view.  It must be hard
knowing you have just returned from a trip.  I hope you get some good news
about your dive team.
Annie
badwilson - 03 Jan 2005 02:26 GMT
> > I thought I saw on CNN Asia that China is donating 60 million.  This
> > was a few days ago.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> about your dive team.
> Annie

Well, we are feeling very lucky to have not been in the area when it
happened.  It's weird, Dennis and I have been so very lucky in so very
many ways.  Not in the lottery winning way of being lucky, but in the
way that things go smoothly for us and our plans work out.  <knocking
on wood>
It is something to be grateful for.
And we did hear about the dive team.  They are all fine, the boat is
ok and so is the shop in Khao Lak.  Woo hoo!  They plan to be open for
business in 2 weeks.  Although I doubt they will have many customers.
--
Britta
Sandpaper kisses, a cuddle and a purr. I have an alarm clock that's
covered in fur!
Check out pictures of Vino at:
http://photos.yahoo.com/badwilson click on the Vino album
Yoj - 03 Jan 2005 23:40 GMT
> Well, we are feeling very lucky to have not been in the area when it
> happened.  It's weird, Dennis and I have been so very lucky in so very
> many ways.  Not in the lottery winning way of being lucky, but in the
> way that things go smoothly for us and our plans work out.  <knocking
> on wood>
> It is something to be grateful for.

I understand your feelings about this, Britta.  I have often felt the same
way.  Some people ask "Why me?" when things don't go their way.  I don't
know how many times I've wondered "Why me?" because mostly good things
happen to me and bad things don't.  True, my husband and my father both died
the same year, but even there, it could have been much worse.  Neither of
them suffered very much, and neither of them had Alzheimer's.  There have
been changes in my life - good changes - in the 18 + years since then that
probably wouldn't have happened otherwise.

I feel blessed.

Joy
Adrian - 02 Jan 2005 17:51 GMT
>> It's difficult for a xenophobic Brit like myself to say this, but
>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/4138763.stm - Thank
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> the survivors of this terrible event. I'm gratified to see the U.S.
> take a large part in the recovery. Annie

I heard Japan gave $500million, I don't know what this works out to per
head of population but it sounds pretty good to me.
Signature

Adrian (Owned by Snoopy & Bagheera)
A house is not a home, without a cat.

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.