>> The obvious solution - stop using MICROS~1 bozoware - is too easy, of
>> course. That's why victims get no sympathy from me.
>
> Really OT.
Agreed, though the subject crops up everywhere from time to time.
> Linux is susceptible to viruses, Trojan horses, worms, too. There are
> few attacks because MS Windows dominates the market, but Linux is also
> vulnerable.
There's no comparison, and it has nothing to do with size of market.
http://www.linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/index.php?page=virus
But, aamof, I wasn't talking about the OS necessarily (though XP might
qualify). Win2k (basically, NT4 + USB support) is an adequate platform.
And there's plenty of third party application software written by clueful
people for that platform.
Just get rid of everything that came for "free" from Micro$oft when you
ordered your computer (especially Windows Scripting Host).
I've used M$ OSs for years, and I never once suffered a virus attack. And
I didn't even have to think about it. All it took was using properly
written software.
> The obvious solution is safe computing, regardless of OS. That is quite
> a job of educating users.
The education that users need is that Microsoft is to software as
McDonalds is to food. The implications of a steady diet for the long term
are equally deadly.