Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / Cat Anecdotes / December 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

What Sign is Your Kitty?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
CatNipped - 04 Dec 2004 19:59 GMT
And do they have the traits of that sign?

Bandit and Sammy are Aries - here's the traits of an Aries...

The Sun blazed in dynamic Aries, a fire sign on your birthday. The Sun in
astrology stands for your inner nature, the light of your essential
character. Aries, the first sign of the Zodiac, is a masculine sign ruled by
the warrior planet Mars, whose motto must be "Crash through, or crash!". A
cardinal (creative and inventive) sign, Aries, the Ram, governs leadership
and initiative. Aries people are bold and self-confident, although they tend
to be overly impulsive.

"Bold, self-confident, overly impulsive" - LOL, yep, that's Bandit!  "Crash
through, or crash!"  - choking on my laughter, Ohmygawd, yes, that's
Sammy!!!

Demi is a Virgo - here's the traits of a Virgo...

Before you Virgo-born individuals worry too much about your natural concern
for attention to detail, a desire for order, organization, and overall
perfection, you should consider that it is the Virgo influence in the world
which schedules and catalogs just about everything. Without this Virgo
quality, planes, trains, busses, and all other regulated and scheduled
events would just more or less happen of their own accord, if at all. You
would go to the airport and have to wait until the pilot decided to leave;
even then he might not fly where you wanted to go.

"Worry too much??!" - ROTFLOL, yes again!

Jessie is a Leo - here's the traits of a Leo...

The Sun rulership of Leo offers a tremendous opportunity for the Leo native
to change what may be a negative desire to show off, upstage others, and to
demand center-stage into a much more positive showing. The trick is to learn
to face reality. If you want to be the center of attention, fine; but when
you do occupy this position, be certain that you have something worthwhile
to offer for the benefit of your "audience." If you don't have anything
constructive to offer, don't demand the spotlight.

"Show off, upstage others, demand center-stage!!!!?????? - <gasping for air
I'm laughing so hard>!  Remember the pictures of my house where Jessie had
to be in almost every shot!!????

CatNipped is a Scorpio - here's the traits of a Scorpio...

There are two symbols for Scorpio - the scorpion, with its legendary sting
and the eagle, which soars aloft to great heights.

'I DESIRE' is the motto for Scorpio. You are intensely emotional and
strongly aware of the darker side of human nature. You don't live on the
surface of life, but experience it at its deepest levels.

You possess an iron will, a strong ego and a unique personal magnetism. You
make a loyal friend and a passionate lover.

You're also intuitive, ambitious and have a penetrating mind. You have a
burning need to uncover what is hidden, whether it's a mystery or someone
else's innermost secrets. You're rarely who you appear to be on the outside
and are not easy to get to know.

You also have a tendency to brood and to bear grudges and can be suspicious
and vindictive.
You are the investigators of the zodiac.

"Strong ego, intensely emotional" - Um, guilty as charged!!

Hugs,

CatNipped
Ginger-lyn Summer - 04 Dec 2004 20:34 GMT
Well, as an astrologer, of course I have had to pay attention to my
kitties' birthdata.  With most of them strays, shelter adoptions and
ferals, who knows when they truly were born?  But I'm pretty good at
figuring it out.  So here's mine:

Cosmo:  Cancerian, with Moon in Aries and Leo rising
Internet:  Pisces, with Gemini rising and Moon in Cancer
Sabra:  Virgo, with Scorpio rising
Trill:  Capricorn, all the way
Wolfie:  the only one whose birth week I know):  Gemini
Brando:  Cancerian
Merlyn:  Taurus
Arthur:  Taurus

Can't remember at this moment all the rest of the Moon and Ascendant
signs.

Cosmo is true to his Leo rising with a mane and very serious, stately
appearance and demeanour.  He's a bit shy (Cancerian) and loves
affection (ditto).  But he does have a temper that he will show out of
nowhere on rare occasions (Aries).

Internet is the sweetest, most gentle, tolerant little guy (Pisces),
who is very friendly to other cats as well (Gemini).  He has some food
issues (Cancer).

Sabra has always been the most perfectly immaculately clean and
groomed cat I have ever known (Virgo).  With a wicked streak, he used
to like to torture Cosmo just for the heck of it (chase him without
actually even *doing* anything to him!)(Scorpio).

Trill *looks* like a little old man, and has always acted like it,
too.  lol.  Very Capricorn.

Wolfie is a skittish as they come, in true Gemini fashion.

Brando, after being tamed, has turned out to worship food and be a lap
cat.  Cancerian, anyone?  ;-)

Merlyn I'm actually wavering on whether she is a Taurus or Pisces.
She is built like a Mack truck, which indicates Taurus, and she is
stubborn (ditto).  But she is also rather shy with strangers and has
an odd delicate air about her, which is Pisces.  She is one major
chatterbox, so Gemini rising is a strong likelihood.

Arthur is young enough, I'm satisfied I'm within a week of his
birthdate, so Taurus it definitely is.  He *loves* comfort.  I think
sometimes he thinks he went to kitty heaven when he came here, with
all the fun places to lay, and all the toys.  He's lately begun
sleeping right next to my back on the heated waterbed.  Ahhh, luxury
for Taurus!

Ginger-lyn
double Cancerian, Moon in Aries
Hans Schr?der - 04 Dec 2004 20:56 GMT
> And do they have the traits of that sign?
>
[quoted text clipped - 77 lines]
>
> CatNipped

Excuse me, CatNipped, but I think you have got too much spare time to spend.

Astrology, IMHO, is a set of absolute useless theories, that many people
make a fortune on. It has never worked for people, and it will certainly not
work for animals.

There are plenty of groups under alt.astrology on the Usenet, so why bother
us with this??

Hans
CatNipped - 04 Dec 2004 21:16 GMT
> Excuse me, CatNipped, but I think you have got too much spare time to spend.
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Hans

Oh, are we in bitch mode again Hans?  Or have you never in your
anal-retentive life done anything just for fun?  If you don't want to be
bothered by this then why bother to reply to my post?  Ah, never mind,
bitchiness *is* obviously fun for you.

If you don't think that astrology is valid then you won't mind my Scorpion
sting will you?

Hugs,

CatNipped
Christina Websell - 04 Dec 2004 21:29 GMT
>> And do they have the traits of that sign?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 96 lines]
>
> Hans

Oh, Hans <sigh>  you did it again..  Didn't put brain into gear before
engaging mouth.

Tweed
CatNipped - 04 Dec 2004 21:30 GMT
> Oh, Hans <sigh>  you did it again..  Didn't put brain into gear before
> engaging mouth.
>
> Tweed

LOL - but Tweed, you're assuming there *is* a brain to be put into gear, I
think you're giving him too much credit!

Hugs,

CatNipped
CK - 04 Dec 2004 21:38 GMT
>>Oh, Hans <sigh>  you did it again..  Didn't put brain into gear before
>>engaging mouth.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> CatNipped

And some peoples' brains have only two gears, on and off. And even the
on-gear isn't too shabby... ;)

Signature

Christine in Vantaa, Finland
christal63 (at) yahoo (dot) com
photos: http://photos.yahoo.com/christal63

CK - 04 Dec 2004 21:45 GMT
>>> Oh, Hans <sigh>  you did it again..  Didn't put brain into gear before
>>> engaging mouth.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> And some peoples' brains have only two gears, on and off. And even the
> on-gear isn't too shabby... ;)

Replying to myself as I picked a saying meaning totally the opposite of
what I was going to say (the not too shabbiness). Maybe *my* brain was
off... :D

Signature

Christine in Vantaa, Finland
christal63 (at) yahoo (dot) com
photos: http://photos.yahoo.com/christal63

Christina Websell - 04 Dec 2004 21:42 GMT
>> Oh, Hans <sigh>  you did it again..  Didn't put brain into gear before
>> engaging mouth.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> CatNipped

Hans certainly has a brain, and a good one at that.  It seems to me that he
tends to be irritable on occasions. Although it isn't always possible to
do - and I know that myself! - when irritability kicks in, it's best for all
concerned that you pretend your keyboard is locked.
I try hard to do this, don't always succeed.  Not so much on this group, but
on another one where the posts can be *extremely* provocative.

Tweed
CatNipped - 04 Dec 2004 22:20 GMT
> Hans certainly has a brain, and a good one at that.

I'll have to take your word on that one, Tweed, since I haven't seen
evidence of its use on this newsgroup!

> It seems to me that he
> tends to be irritable on occasions.

And so do we all, but I don't see others here taking potshots at people just
because they're having PMS.  This is at least the second time he's lashed
out at someone who posted a non-provocative post about cats.

> Although it isn't always possible to
> do - and I know that myself! - when irritability kicks in, it's best for all
> concerned that you pretend your keyboard is locked.
> I try hard to do this, don't always succeed.

I get irritable, true, but I don't just jump on someone for no reason
because I'm irritable - that's a basic restraint needed to function in
polite society.

> Not so much on this group, but
> on another one where the posts can be *extremely* provocative.

True, I guess I've become spoiled by the nice, kind, sensitive and caring
people on this group and forgot what most newsgroups have to put up with.
Gee, thanks for reminding me Hans!

Hugs,

CatNipped

> Tweed
Hans Schr?der - 04 Dec 2004 23:24 GMT
>> Hans certainly has a brain, and a good one at that.
>
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
>> Tweed

I'm a bit sad and confused now. All right, I am not like all of you
monochrome conformists out there. This time I expressed my opinion on
astrology, I could have let out the first line in my posting, which I can
see could be taken personally, but I stand for the rest of it.

I like this group, too, and I contribute to it the best I can with stories
about my cats, my life and so on. But what makes me sad, is that whenever I
open my keyboard to let it print some of my personal opinions on things, I
get my balls kicked for being grumpy, bitchy (always thought that was an
adjective connected to females, but anyway...) and all kinds of bad things.
It really hurts me, and that's true...

In Norway, we have a tradition on speaking out what we mean. Ok, some people
disagree, some agree, we have a discussion, and then we're friends again,
even with those who disagree the most. As easy as that. I don't want this
group to be a community where all contributors have to think just about the
same about everything, you should stand that some people have different
opinions without creating a lynch mob...

The first times I sent postings to this group, I realise that I didn't
behave properly all the time, and I have apologized that several times.
Proof? I've also been sending purrs for cats (or people) in need of them.

Honestly, I think we need all kinds of people in this group, an argument is
not a catastrophe.

To say a bit more about myself (I think a lot of people in this group have
been wondering about that), I live in Oslo, Norway, out of work for the
moment, I am not religious, I am an agnostic, that is to say I will believe
in a god when I see him, before that, I don't care.

I am 47, divorced, and live in a bedroom at a friend of mine until I can
afford to move into something better (i.e. when I get a job).

As most of you know, I am a man with temper. Like a cat, I can show you my
teeth and hiss at you, but i NEVER bite or use my claws (at least, you won't
see any blood). In fact, I find my temper is one of my better qualities,
never leaving a question behind on what I mean or how I react to things
going on.

Still confused about me? In that case, drop me a line at han-schr@online.no
and I will do my best to confuse you even more ;-) Just kidding, but just
drop me a line, I would be happy.

But my balls are so sore now: Please don't kick them anymore!

I have to go now, I must get up at 7:30 AM to go to a cat exhibition with my
ex-wife.
Why:
1. Pick up the beauty that Teti is going to "play" with for the next three
or four days
2. To help my ex selling homemade wool cat toys at the exhibition. If you
want, you can look at her products at http://www.moonas.no I know you can't
understand the language (most of you), but if you just browse the pages by
instinct, you will get an idea...

Have a nice, peacefull Sunday!
Hans

Hans
Kreisleriana - 05 Dec 2004 01:16 GMT
On Sun, 5 Dec 2004 00:24:47 +0100, "Hans Schrøder"
<han-schr@online.no> yodeled:

>I'm a bit sad and confused now. All right, I am not like all of you
>monochrome conformists out there. This time I expressed my opinion on
>astrology, I could have let out the first line in my posting, which I can
>see could be taken personally, but I stand for the rest of it.

OK, Hans, I'll try to explain it to you.

Nobody actually cares about your opinion of astrology.  I'm sure a lot
of people here think it's crap, too.  The point is that nobody else
who thinks that took the opportunity to stomp on Nipped's posting in
that rude and dismissive way.  
You see, this group, AFAIK, is not a group of "monochrome conformists"
by any stretch.   If it were, were would only post about cats, and
nothing else.  But we are able to recognize how our cats play into our
personalities and the rest of our lives, so those things often come up
in discussion, too. In case you hadn't noticed, this group seems to
have a social aspect, too, and we consider each other friends.  

You seem to be saying that your beliefs and expression have been
somehow stifled.  But what were you trying to do to Nipped?  Sorry, I
can't defend so-called "freedom of speech" if it's being called on to
stifle somebody else's, and tell her what she should and shouldn't
post here.  That's just disingenuous.

Theresa
Stinky Pictures: http://community.webshots.com/album/125591586JWEFwh
My Blog: http://www.humanitas.blogspot.com
CatNipped - 05 Dec 2004 01:57 GMT
> I'm a bit sad and confused now. All right, I am not like all of you
> monochrome conformists out there. This time I expressed my opinion on
> astrology, I could have let out the first line in my posting, which I can
> see could be taken personally, but I stand for the rest of it.

Actually, I don't necessarily believe in astrology either.  And if you would
have said, "I don't believe in astrology, I think it's a bunch of crap" I
might have replied "Yeah, you're probably right, but I was just having some
fun comparing my cats' personalities to the traits assigned to astrological
signs".  Instead what you did was rudely suggest that I should not have
posted that thread here, even though what I posted was about my cats.

I'm sorry about your sore balls, and I'm truly sorry if you're feeling down
right now (I did say one of the signs of depression was reacting with anger
to something that would not normally make you angry, sigh).  However,
whether it is just from being told this all my life, or whether there is
maybe something to astrology, I tend to react in classic Scorpio style, with
a quick and deadly sting, when I perceive a threat or mistreatment to either
myself, someone I love, or someone I believe to be helpless.  As my husband
fondly says of me, using a quote from Fawlty Towers, "She can draw blood
with her tongue at thirty paces."

I have no illusions that I am always right, indeed life experience has shown
me how very little I truly know about anything.  I am always open to being
corrected, and I love to have discussions with people who see things
differently than I do.  You, or anyone else here, can disagree with me all
you like, I take no offense in that.  But unless you want to walk away
metaphorically bloodied, please do so in a civil manner.  Just as you are
feeling down right now, there are many, many people here who are feeling
very fragile at this difficult time of year, and a nasty post can do more
than just cause hurt feelings to someone who is battling with depression.
Had you not posted in this manner in the recent past I probably would have
just let it go, but I wanted to let you know that it is *not* OK to be nasty
here - my friends here don't deserve it, and neither do I, and neither do
you.

Hugs,

CatNipped
Singh - 05 Dec 2004 19:06 GMT
"Hans Schrøder" wrote:

> >> Hans certainly has a brain, and a good one at that.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
> astrology, I could have let out the first line in my posting, which I can
> see could be taken personally, but I stand for the rest of it.

It is one thing to express one's views on such things as astrology. If you don't
believe in it, it's cool. Just as we all don't follow one religious doctrine
here, we don't expect everyone to be into the horoscopes. Myself, I look at them
as an entertainment and an ice-breaker at parties and kaffeeklatches. But the
post you originally placed seemed to take more of a shot at CatNipped as a
person with too much time and too little brain. It sounded condescending. That
is not cool.

> I like this group, too, and I contribute to it the best I can with stories
> about my cats, my life and so on. But what makes me sad, is that whenever I
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> same about everything, you should stand that some people have different
> opinions without creating a lynch mob...

Nor do I. I don't think any of us wants to be a cookie-cutter.

> The first times I sent postings to this group, I realise that I didn't
> behave properly all the time, and I have apologized that several times.
> Proof? I've also been sending purrs for cats (or people) in need of them.

I know. We all put our foot in our mouths every now and again, on the group and
outside, and usually come off all right.

> Honestly, I think we need all kinds of people in this group, an argument is
> not a catastrophe.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> moment, I am not religious, I am an agnostic, that is to say I will believe
> in a god when I see him, before that, I don't care.

As I define a religion as a way of living and not necessarily a way of worship,
I propose that agnosticism is a form of religion, as is atheism. One who does
not believe in a deity can live by an ethical code the same as, or higher than,
many believers'.

> I am 47, divorced, and live in a bedroom at a friend of mine until I can
> afford to move into something better (i.e. when I get a job).
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> never leaving a question behind on what I mean or how I react to things
> going on.

Having a fire under your a.s is a good thing. It inspires a person to action.

I'll leave your nuts alone!

Blessed be,
Baha
Ginger-lyn Summer - 05 Dec 2004 19:50 GMT
Hans, let me try to explain a few things.

This group isn't about arguing.  There are plenty of other groups for
that.  It's about support, community, and sharing.  We certainly have
a wide range of people and opinions here, and although we occasionally
disagree vehemently about some topic or another, in general, this is a
friendly group that tends to avoid arguing with each other.  At least
that is my take on it.  And attacking someone for a post is definitely
*not* something we generally do here, unless it's a troll, which was
not the case this time.

I'm sorry you feel bad and disagree.  You are certainly welcome here,
but please, refrain from attacking people, okay?  That's not what
we're about in this little corner of the Internet.

Ginger-lyn
Professional Astrologer

>I'm a bit sad and confused now. All right, I am not like all of you
>monochrome conformists out there. This time I expressed my opinion on
[quoted text clipped - 56 lines]
>
>Hans
Yowie - 07 Dec 2004 03:35 GMT
<snip>

> I'm a bit sad and confused now. All right, I am not like all of you
> monochrome conformists out there.

Monochrome conformists? Do you really mean that? Or was that said in a
moment of impulsiveness?

> This time I expressed my opinion on
> astrology, I could have let out the first line in my posting, which I can
> see could be taken personally, but I stand for the rest of it.

And that, I think, lies at the heart of the problem. The first line set the
tone of the post. Had you let out that line, and the last line, I don't
think anyone would have gotten particularly upset.

> I like this group, too, and I contribute to it the best I can with stories
> about my cats, my life and so on. But what makes me sad, is that whenever I
> open my keyboard to let it print some of my personal opinions on things, I
> get my balls kicked for being grumpy, bitchy (always thought that was an
> adjective connected to females, but anyway...) and all kinds of bad things.
> It really hurts me, and that's true...

I would hazard a guess the reason why some of your posts come across as
mean-spirited is because you are not writing in your native language, and
you don't have much experience with written *conversation* in English where
tone is important. Whilst your meaning is quite clear, there may have been
other, less upsetting, ways of saying what you wanted to say.

> In Norway, we have a tradition on speaking out what we mean. Ok, some people
> disagree, some agree, we have a discussion, and then we're friends again,
> even with those who disagree the most. As easy as that. I don't want this
> group to be a community where all contributors have to think just about the
> same about everything, you should stand that some people have different
> opinions without creating a lynch mob...

Again, its all about tone. Tone makes the difference between a discussion
and an argument.

Differences of opinion are quite allowed - even valued - here, as long as
that differnce of opinion is respected and is not used to belittle or hurt
another.

I'm not a big believer in Astrology either, however I know that some people
here can and do take Astrology very seriously. I'm not going to make fun of
them for doing so, because they are my friends, and I know that they won't
make fun of me for *not* believing in it. Simple as that. And if I can find
some fun and amusement by reading and posting about Cat Astrology, I will do
so, not because I do believe in Astrology, and not because I don't, but
because by posting, I'm joining in the conversation and having fun. If I
really objected to Astrology that much, I simply wouldn't participate in the
thread, and leave it for those who are obvioulsy enjoying the conversation,
inane as it may be to me.

Cheers,

Yowie
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 07 Dec 2004 04:02 GMT
"Hans Schroeder" <han-schr@online.no> wrote:

> I'm a bit sad and confused now. All right, I am not like all of you
> monochrome conformists out there. This time I expressed my opinion on
> astrology, I could have let out the first line in my posting, which I can
> see could be taken personally, but I stand for the rest of it.

Nobody is criticizing you for your opinion about astrology. Do you
follow me? Nobody cares what you think about astrology. You don't have
to conform to anything - except consideration and respect for others
here. (And you don't *have* to conform to that, either, but if you
don't, that's when people will get annoyed with you.)

I don't believe in astrology either, but if I'm not interested in a
thread, I simply don't read it. You are not forced to read anything
that doesn't interest you! I actually *count on* there being a regular
number of threads I'm NOT reading - otherwise, I'd spend way too much
time on this ng. (And that means less time for... you-know-what. :))

One more time: Hans, you are not expected to share the opinion of anyone
here, and nobody expects you to believe in something just because many
of us do. All we expect is for you to be decent to people - and calling
people "monochrome conformists" is NOT decent. That is all that people
are angry about.

> whenever I open my keyboard to let it print some of my personal
> opinions on things, I get my balls kicked for being grumpy, bitchy
> (always thought that was an adjective connected to females, but
> anyway...)

Now you're insulted because you got the wrong kind of insult?

> It really hurts me, and that's true...

I'm sure it hurts people to be told: "Excuse me, you have too much
time on your hands" and "why bother us with this?" If you say something
nasty to someone else, then don't whine when someone says something
nasty back.

> As most of you know, I am a man with temper.

Why don't you save it for people who deserve it, rather than using it
on people who are innocently enjoying themselves, not hurting anyone?
I'm sorry that not every thread on this ng interests you, but most of
us are content to delete the posts we don't care about. Why can't you?

> In fact, I find my temper is one of my better qualities, never
> leaving a question behind on what I mean or how I react to things
> going on.

Personally, if that's the answer, I'd rather have the question.

Joyce
Kreisleriana - 05 Dec 2004 01:06 GMT
On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 21:56:43 +0100, "Hans Schrøder"
<han-schr@online.no> yodeled:

>Astrology, IMHO, is a set of absolute useless theories, that many people
>make a fortune on. It has never worked for people, and it will certainly not
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>Hans

Good Lord, Hans can't you let people have their fun without
criticizing them?  Who cares whether astrology is valid or not.
That's simply not the point.  As to whether we are wasting time here,
I think one could probably maintain that all of USENET is a waste of
time.   In my experience, this has always been a group with "topic
crawl,"  and I like it fine that way.   If you don't like it, then you
are free to mark and not read whatever topics you don't like.  But
don't beat up on good friends.

Theresa
Stinky Pictures: http://community.webshots.com/album/125591586JWEFwh
My Blog: http://www.humanitas.blogspot.com
Christina Websell - 05 Dec 2004 01:24 GMT
>>Astrology, IMHO, is a set of absolute useless theories, that many people
>>make a fortune on. It has never worked for people, and it will certainly
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Theresa

Hans has already been told off for this and says not to kick his nuptials
any more, as they are sore.
Well.
I look at it like this.  As far as I'm concerned (and I'm quite a newbie
here myself) this is a group of friends, who all have cats.  But we are
friends as well, and therefore can post what concerns us and what interests
us.  I liked the post about astrology for our cats.  It fitted well here.
I replied and would like to know what anyone thinks my cat's birthsigns
might be, if they are into astrology.

Tweed
Singh - 05 Dec 2004 19:06 GMT
> > On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 21:56:43 +0100, "Hans Schrøder"
> > <han-schr@online.no> yodeled:
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> Hans has already been told off for this and says not to kick his nuptials
> any more, as they are sore.

NUPTIALS?! that is the best euphemism for a man's stones I've seen in eons!

Blessed be,
Baha
Sherry - 05 Dec 2004 04:21 GMT
>>Astrology, IMHO, is a set of absolute useless theories, that many people
>>make a fortune on. It has never worked for people, and it will certainly not
>
>>work for animals.

I dunno. If the moon is powerful enough to control the tide of the oceans, I
have to believe the stars are powerful enough to influence people.
On the other hand, I'm an Aries; i.e. the strong, impulsive leader-type.  It
kind of makes me want to check the validity of my birth certificate. My DH is a
twin, and the polar opposite of his twin to boot. My kids are born one day and
5 years apart, so they're both the same "sign"...sometimes I can't even believe
they are related they are so different. Those are the reasons I don't get too
choked up over astrology. But it's fun anyway.

Sherry
William Hamblen - 05 Dec 2004 16:18 GMT
>I dunno. If the moon is powerful enough to control the tide of the oceans, I
>have to believe the stars are powerful enough to influence people.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>they are related they are so different. Those are the reasons I don't get too
>choked up over astrology. But it's fun anyway.

The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars,  
but in ourselves, that we are underlings.
Christine Burel - 06 Dec 2004 01:33 GMT
> >I dunno. If the moon is powerful enough to control the tide of the oceans, I
> >have to believe the stars are powerful enough to influence people.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars,
> but in ourselves, that we are underlings.

Absolutely ROFLOL!  Good one!
Christine
pmendhall - 05 Dec 2004 01:21 GMT
If you don't care for the thread, please don't read it.  Others may be
interested in the topic and I do not appreciate your attempts to censor what
others post.

Sometimes you write some things that are very entertaining, and enjoyable.
Other times, like this post, you come across as a cranky person.  Please
read what you write for "tone" before posting.

Diane

> Excuse me, CatNipped, but I think you have got too much spare time to spend.
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Hans
Singh - 05 Dec 2004 18:50 GMT
"Hans Schrøder" wrote:

> Excuse me, CatNipped, but I think you have got too much spare time to spend.
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> There are plenty of groups under alt.astrology on the Usenet, so why bother
> us with this??

Perhaps because it is a fun diversion and many of us just need to kick back and
have a few chuckles maybe? I don't see the harm in it; and if CatNipped wants to
spend a bit of her spare time having a little fun with the horoscopes it's
nothing to get prickly over. We can't spend all our time in the clouds of the
intellect, and must every so often just enjoy a sniff of the roses and a roll in
the grass.

Blessed be,
Baha
badwilson - 06 Dec 2004 05:44 GMT
> > And do they have the traits of that sign?
> >
[quoted text clipped - 88 lines]
>
> Hans

LOL!  Hans is off his meds again ;-)
--
Britta
Sandpaper kisses, a cuddle and a purr. I have an alarm clock that's
covered in fur!
Check out pictures of Vino at:
http://photos.yahoo.com/badwilson click on the Vino album
CK - 04 Dec 2004 21:02 GMT
Laku's 22 May 2000 - Gemini (barely out of Taurus) / Dragon (Chinese)
Nico's 8 Aug 2004 - Leo / Monkey (Chinese)
Haven't been reading up on horoscopes lately, so I'm not sure about the
traits. Nico does like to be the centre of attention, but so does Laku.
Maybe it's more of a kitty trait than having to do with horoscopes... :)

Signature

Christine in Vantaa, Finland
christal63 (at) yahoo (dot) com
photos: http://photos.yahoo.com/christal63

Christina Websell - 04 Dec 2004 21:21 GMT
As my two were both rescues, I haven't a clue what their birthsigns might
be, I'd quite like to, though.
Kitty is independent, fierce, unforgiving and can be violent if necessary.
She accepts affection only on her own terms, only when *she* wants it,
otherwise a definite rebuff.  She likes only the food she fancies that day.
Scorpio?
Boyfriend is almost totally the reverse.  He didn't do well at being
independent, and even though he was almost terminally shy at that stage, he
had the sense to attach himself to a house in the hope of being fed.
He is very kind natured, has nothing like a temper at all.  He is extremely
polite.  He would *never* push himself on you, be "in yer face."  He asks
for things only when he thinks you aren't busy.  Very quietly too. He will
only settle next to me on the settee if I am extremely still and quiet.
Pisces?

Tweed

> And do they have the traits of that sign?
>
[quoted text clipped - 77 lines]
>
> CatNipped
Yowie - 07 Dec 2004 04:17 GMT
I dunno about Shmogg.

Back when I was far more religious than I am now, if someone asked me what
sign I was, I'd answer "I was born again under the sign of the cross".

Perhaps this is similar to Shmogg:  He was just born cross :-)

Actually thinking if anything, he'd be a Gemini, an absolute purr-puddle
occasionally, and a right b*st*rd c*t the rest of the time, and can change
without any warning from one to the other at light speed. Almost like I have
two cats in the one body.

Yowie
jmcquown - 04 Dec 2004 23:45 GMT
> And do they have the traits of that sign?
>
> Hugs,
>
> CatNipped

No idea.  I don't know when my Persia was born :(

Jill
CatNipped - 05 Dec 2004 02:01 GMT
> > And do they have the traits of that sign?
> >
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Jill

What is her personality like?  Let's try to guess and assign her a sign for
fun (and you might want to make it semi-official and celebrate her birthday
in that timeframe).  Here's a link that has some of the traits:
http://www.cjwinters.com/astrochars.html.

Again, this is just for fun!

Hugs,

CatNipped
jmcquown - 05 Dec 2004 03:13 GMT
>>> And do they have the traits of that sign?
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> CatNipped

According to this link, she's a Taurus.

Solid - Practical - Stable - Gentle - Sensual - Stubborn - Lazy -
Possessive - Self indulgent - Materialistic - Artistic - Deliberate - Self
reliant - Slow - Reliable - Charming - Acquisitive - Beauty loving -
Attracting - Affectionate - Building - Evaluating - Firm - Supportive -
Contented - Tranquil - Steadfast - Placid - Comfort seeking - Conservative -
Natural - Patient - Calming - Sex, love

Jill
CatNipped - 05 Dec 2004 03:54 GMT
> According to this link, she's a Taurus.
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Jill

OK, how about May 5th as her semi-official birthday then?  We'll throw her a
virtual party with virtual balloons and real good wishes and love!!

Hugs,

CatNipped
Kreisleriana - 05 Dec 2004 15:59 GMT
>> According to this link, she's a Taurus.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
>CatNipped

What about Stinky?  I don't know what his birthday is, either.  I
celebrate his birthday at the turn of the year, because I got him in
early summer, and the vet said he was six months old.

What is his personality?  Sweet, sweet, sweet.  Amiable,
imperturbable,  tolerant, patient, great equanimity.  Curious--  no,
NOSY; Goofy, frivolous; friendly, trusting, open, accepting.  Cuddly.
Chatty. ;)

Theresa
Stinky Pictures: http://community.webshots.com/album/125591586JWEFwh
My Blog: http://www.humanitas.blogspot.com
CatNipped - 05 Dec 2004 16:22 GMT
> What about Stinky?  I don't know what his birthday is, either.  I
> celebrate his birthday at the turn of the year, because I got him in
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> NOSY; Goofy, frivolous; friendly, trusting, open, accepting.  Cuddly.
> Chatty. ;)

Hmmmm.  Sounds like maybe a PISCES, February 19 March 20?  That would be
close to the age the vet guessed if he were born near Feb. 19th.  Does this
fit?

Compassionate - Impressionable - Dreamy - Sacrificial - Spiritual -
Psychic - Indecisive - Dualistic - Romantic - Sensitive - Misunderstood -
Impractical - Mystical - Nebulous - Confused - Deceptive - Visionary -
Devoted - Idealistic - Imaginative - Sympathetic - Creative - Secretive -
Retiring - Shy - Charitable - Illusive - Credulous - Fantasizing -
Undefined - Mediumistic - Subtle - Deluded - Intriguing - Drifting - Vague

Hugs,

CatNipped

> Theresa
> Stinky Pictures: http://community.webshots.com/album/125591586JWEFwh
> My Blog: http://www.humanitas.blogspot.com
Kreisleriana - 06 Dec 2004 14:21 GMT
>> What about Stinky?  I don't know what his birthday is, either.  I
>> celebrate his birthday at the turn of the year, because I got him in
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>close to the age the vet guessed if he were born near Feb. 19th.  Does this
>fit?

Well . . . I would have to say Aquarius or Capricorn-- Pisces puts it
too late in the year.  I wouldn't say the below really fits him-- he's
NOT secretive or shy, among other things. ;)  

>Compassionate - Impressionable - Dreamy - Sacrificial - Spiritual -
>Psychic - Indecisive - Dualistic - Romantic - Sensitive - Misunderstood -
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>> Stinky Pictures: http://community.webshots.com/album/125591586JWEFwh
>> My Blog: http://www.humanitas.blogspot.com

Theresa
Stinky Pictures: http://community.webshots.com/album/125591586JWEFwh
My Blog: http://www.humanitas.blogspot.com
Singh - 05 Dec 2004 19:12 GMT
My guess is Sagittarius. The friendly, frivolous, open and goofy part is said to
be quite Sagittarian. I know, because I'm one and very much a goofball!

Blessed be,
Baha

> What about Stinky?  I don't know what his birthday is, either.  I
> celebrate his birthday at the turn of the year, because I got him in
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Stinky Pictures: http://community.webshots.com/album/125591586JWEFwh
> My Blog: http://www.humanitas.blogspot.com
badwilson - 06 Dec 2004 05:55 GMT
> > According to this link, she's a Taurus.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> CatNipped

Yeah, that would be cool because May 5th is Vino's birthday too :-)  I
think he fits the Taurus description quite well, but I'm not that into
astrology to be really sure.
--
Britta
Sandpaper kisses, a cuddle and a purr. I have an alarm clock that's
covered in fur!
Check out pictures of Vino at:
http://photos.yahoo.com/badwilson click on the Vino album
Enfilade - 05 Dec 2004 00:49 GMT
Nocturne is also an Aries.  She's got the "bold" and "Self confident"
down but I don't know about "impulsive."  She's more likely to spend
hours plotting vengeance.

The bitties are Cancer.  Does anyone know the traits for Cancer?

Smokey, we guess, is a Leo since we adopted him in that month and we
guestimate his age as if he were born in August.  He isn't much of a
born leader.  He's kind of like a male lion--sleeps, mates (or tries
to) and waits for females to bring him food.

DP and I are Virgos who utterly despise order in every way.

--Fil
CatNipped - 05 Dec 2004 02:03 GMT
> Nocturne is also an Aries.  She's got the "bold" and "Self confident"
> down but I don't know about "impulsive."  She's more likely to spend
> hours plotting vengeance.
>
> The bitties are Cancer.  Does anyone know the traits for Cancer?

From the link I just posted in reply to Jill's post:

Tenacious - Enveloping - Protecting - Collecting - Maternal - Clannish -
Clinging - Reflecting - Sensitive - Remembering - Habitual - Hospitable -
Endearing - Touchy - Cherishing - Moody - Imaginative - Psychic - Restless -
Domestic - Sympathetic - Romantic - Greedy - Timid - Family centered -
Considerate - Changeable - Empathetic - Insecure - Sentimental -
Instinctual - Impressionable - Kind - Self absorbed

Does that sound like it fits them?

> Smokey, we guess, is a Leo since we adopted him in that month and we
> guestimate his age as if he were born in August.  He isn't much of a
> born leader.  He's kind of like a male lion--sleeps, mates (or tries
> to) and waits for females to bring him food.
>
> DP and I are Virgos who utterly despise order in every way.

LOL - well, there's [probably more than one] exception to every rule!!  ;>

Hugs,

CatNipped

> --Fil
Enfilade - 05 Dec 2004 20:04 GMT
> > The bitties are Cancer.  Does anyone know the traits for Cancer?
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Does that sound like it fits them?

Clinging, tenacious, domestic, sensitive, Empathetic,
Impressionable...that's our bitties.

As for Tyche, she embodies "clannish" and "family centered" as:  If
you aren't in my family I HATE YOU!  HISSSSSSS!!! ;)

--Fil
Singh - 05 Dec 2004 18:45 GMT
> And do they have the traits of that sign?

Roxie and Stosh are both Gemini, although Roxie is a year older. I'm wondering
if this could explain why sometimes they have a rivalry thing going on, and why
Stosh is such a mama's boy at times and other times he wants to beat the hell
out of me. I think it is the sign of communication, ruled by Mercury; Roxie is
the talker among us, the most expressive and most frequent. She is also the most
meditative, though, a quality she shares with Odessa. I'm told Geminis tend to
be changeable; those of you with more astrology knowledge, feel free to enlightn
me please!

Brandy is Aquarius; I think of the Age of Aquarius song, how it talks about
loving everyone, and that's my Brandy. She also has some of the reasoning
capabilities which i understand is an Aquarian trait. Put a munchie into
something difficult to reach, and she will move heaven and earth to get it,
exhausting all possibilities.

Odessa, best I can figure, is on the Aquarius/Pisces cusp. I'll admit I don't
know much about Pisces, except it is supposed to be a sign of the subconscious
and mystical, and could well explain her inscrutability and her knack of
exploring places I never thought a cat could manage.

For the record, I'm Sagittarius and Louie is Aries; the definition of Aries here
is spot on for him, though he'd never admit it! Sagittarius is said to be both
the theologian and the party-hearty one of the zodiac, a near-impossible
combination; and we are said to be the most likely to marry later in life.

Blessed be,
Baha

> Bandit and Sammy are Aries - here's the traits of an Aries...
>
[quoted text clipped - 63 lines]
>
> CatNipped
Helen Miles - 06 Dec 2004 14:47 GMT
His Royal Feline Lordship Tiger is so *VERY DEFINITELY* a Leo!!

Helen M

> Jessie is a Leo - here's the traits of a Leo...
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> to offer for the benefit of your "audience." If you don't have anything
> constructive to offer, don't demand the spotlight.
CatNipped - 06 Dec 2004 15:36 GMT
> His Royal Feline Lordship Tiger is so *VERY DEFINITELY* a Leo!!
>
> Helen M

I love it when cats are Leo (like my Jessie) - they seem to so embody the
definition of cathood!

Hugs,

CatNipped
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.