Cat Forum / Cat Anecdotes / May 2008
Abelard Update
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Pat - 21 May 2008 15:02 GMT It's still touch-and-go with the Aby cat.
He's getting around much better, but he seems to have a "head cold" and it's become all but impossible to get anything into his stomach. I've never seen anything like the behavior he's exhibiting. There's no way to get a pill into him now. Just absolutely no way. You can't even get close to his mouth with one, he thrashes so violently and snaps, bites anything in the vicinity, and foams profusely at the mouth when nothing at all has been given. My hands are a total mess.
And of course he still won't eat or drink - at least, I haven't seen him do so, and I don't think he's sneaking food, because he continues growing thinner. Being that it's so very difficult to administer anything, I've started injecting 50cc of 0.45% saline solution under the skin once a day, and he's starting to get impatient with that. I might be able to get away with it one or two more times before it becomes as difficult as giving water by mouth with a syringe.
I guess it's up to him, now, to either get well or die, because he won't let me do much of anything aimed at keeping him alive.
Adrian - 21 May 2008 15:30 GMT > It's still touch-and-go with the Aby cat. > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > I guess it's up to him, now, to either get well or die, because he > won't let me do much of anything aimed at keeping him alive. Continuing purrs.
 Signature Adrian (Owned by Snoopy, Bagheera & Shadow) Cats leave pawprints on your heart http://community.webshots.com/user/clowderuk
hopitus - 21 May 2008 16:55 GMT > It's still touch-and-go with the Aby cat. > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > I guess it's up to him, now, to either get well or die, because he won't let > me do much of anything aimed at keeping him alive. (barf) and if you are really demented enough to ask me why or begin your abusive ravings again (yeah, this 'creature' several states over from you is now seething hatred and venom, all right, you &&((#&****!!! ) and pardon me Kyla, nothing personal: VET VET VET VET VET VET VET VET VET VET I have lost it. This ongoing torture of a helpless pet is much worse than imagining your 'electrocution fence' to keep your cats in your yard. If you have any brains left at all, don't post us describing Aby's death throes. You sicken me, bigtime. "Up to him".......my God.
Daniel Mahoney - 21 May 2008 17:17 GMT > If you have any brains left at all, don't post us describing Aby's > death throes. You sicken me, bigtime. "Up to him".......my God. Did you miss yesterday afternoon's post about her talk with the vet? Where the vet told her to not force feed and give it 24 hours?
Calm the f**k down! Everybody, I really don't care whether you like Pat or not, the fact is that she's talking to the vet regularly and taking the cat in to see the vet when appropriate. She's being diligent about caring about Abelard. He went in to see the vet several times - first to an a**hole vet, then to a better vet. And Pat has been in touch with the vet by telephone often.
Abelard is in the position many sick cats are - if they want to get better, they will. If they don't, they won't. If a cat doesn't want to get better, nothing the vet can do will make a difference.
For some reason, a lot of folks seem to get enraged about Pat. I don't get it. I know some people have had personal conflicts with her, but please, don't drag them up here. We've got enough nasty crap going on without personal attacks taking place on RPCA. PLEASE! Everybody just take a deep breath and chill. I'm sorry if I piss some people off, but I depend on RPCA and it's a major part of my life, and I get pissed off myself when people get nasty here. This is the internet, folks - take a deep breath and chill. And if you really don't like to read what Pat writes, or what I write, then use your kill file. Don't bombard the rest of us.
Dan
jmcquown - 21 May 2008 17:48 GMT >> If you have any brains left at all, don't post us describing Aby's >> death throes. You sicken me, bigtime. "Up to him".......my God. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > don't get it. I know some people have had personal conflicts with > her, but please, don't drag them up here. While I understand your position (and am happy she's in regular contact with the vet), Pat herself dragged up all the personal issues. I'm minding my own business, reading posts, when I suddenly find her talking about *me*, dragging up something that happened years ago. This despite the fact I haven't said boo to her since she stormed out of the group... how long ago now? I'm not about to sit on my hands and take something like that without responding, especially since she has a highly selective memory.
> We've got enough nasty crap > going on without personal attacks taking place on RPCA. PLEASE! I respect your feelings, Dan, which is why I stopped reading or replying to any of HER posts. I wish Abelard the best. Pat I couldn't care less about.
Jill
Daniel Mahoney - 21 May 2008 17:58 GMT But at the same time you've not posted nastiness directed her where we all have to read it. Thank you! That's all I'm asking for.
I realize that Pat has initiated some of the nastiness. I'm just asking that if people really, really feel a need to post nastiness, that they consider doing it via e-mail. When I see that kind of nastiness I generally just click "Ignore Thread" but I'm not willing to do that when the health of a kitty is in question. If you must handle the post via Usenet, please do something like labeling the post with "PERSONAL:" at the start of the subject so that those of us who don't want to read the nastiness don't have to.
This group is like a family. Most of the people generally get along really well. A few of the people don't. And like in family gatherings, the folks who don't get along really ought to air their differences in private, not subject the rest of the family to the violence.
To those who have repressed their urges to post unkind or angry messages, thank you, thank you, thank you.
Dan
Pat - 21 May 2008 18:21 GMT | To those who have repressed their urges to post unkind or angry messages, | thank you, thank you, thank you. I concur. And thank *you* Dan.
I guess I wasn't pay close enough attention to the kitty, or the right kind of attention. What I needed to do was to "read" him with more sensitivity, and shortly after making the last post, I "tuned in" as best I could, and learned that what he really wanted to go out and absorb some natural sunlight. So we went hunting.
I got a few strange looks from passersby as I crawled around in the grass with Aby. He was absolutely thrilled to be out, strolling and rolling around in the grass, purring up a storm, headbutting me over and over and exercising his claws on anything that looked inviting. After a while, I slipped into the kitchen and grabbed a knife and the package of salmon I had thawed last night for my lunch. I figured if he's gonna eat anything, this would be it. And I was right, he devoured the salmon greedily with no encouragement from me!
So I think he really needs is to be out in nature regularly. They all do. I *must* get that fence finished!!
Stormmee - 21 May 2008 17:51 GMT I was so right about your character when I let you adopt Harri, Lee
> > If you have any brains left at all, don't post us describing Aby's > > death throes. You sicken me, bigtime. "Up to him".......my God. [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > > Dan CatNipped - 21 May 2008 18:14 GMT >> If you have any brains left at all, don't post us describing Aby's >> death throes. You sicken me, bigtime. "Up to him".......my God. [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > better, they will. If they don't, they won't. If a cat doesn't want to get > better, nothing the vet can do will make a difference. The vet can give an animal a peaceful, merciful death. Allowing an animal to suffer and die on its own is a horrible thing to envisage. Starving to death is *not* painless. Knowing that Hunter died at home alone, even though we were told it was probably instantaneous and painless, still haunts us with "what ifs" and "we should haves".
> For some reason, a lot of folks seem to get enraged about Pat. I don't get > it. I know some people have had personal conflicts with her, but please, [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Dan Dan, I love you dearly, but please don't ask anyone here to ignore the torture Pat is making Abelard endure. Hopitus is rightfully angry at Pat's dramatic posts describing Abelard's decline - it is excruciating to witness this even second hand. Yes we can killfile Pat, but does that help Abelard - do we just ignore his suffering? I know Pat is your friend, and as her friend maybe you should advise her on ending Abelard's suffering rather than defending her actions and chastising someone for caring about Abelard.
Hugs,
CatNipped
Daniel Mahoney - 21 May 2008 19:09 GMT > Dan, I love you dearly, but please don't ask anyone here to ignore the > torture Pat is making Abelard endure. Hopitus is rightfully angry at [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Abelard's suffering rather than defending her actions and chastising > someone for caring about Abelard. The thing is, I am NOT convinced that Abelard is dieing! Everybody is hopping on the bandwagon to criticize her, when he was eating a little bit yesterday or late the day before, and now her recent post tells us that he ate a little more today.
I have no doubt that if Abelard stopped eating entirely Pat would take him to see the vet. Sure, he's stopped eating for a day at a time. That happens sometimes. Yes, he's losing weight that he would be better not losing. Does that mean he's at risk of hepatic lipidosis? I don't know - I'm not there to look at him. But Pat's vet has, and Pat is either taking Abelard to the vet or talking to the vet describing his progress.
I am not convinced that Abelard is beyond help, nor is he at the point that Pat should be thinking about having him PTS. I think that she's taking every step she can to get him to eat and drink short of applying inappropriate violence. Would you rather see a kitty who could yet recover and live a happy life in a loving home put to sleep prematurely, or see his caring human join him in fighting this illness? To me, that's what Pat is doing.
If I start to believe that she's prolonging pointless agony, then I'll recommend the final trip to the vet. But he isn't there yet, and everybody needs to TAKE A DEEP BREATH, reread what she's posted about what she has done and is doing, and realize that she loves Abelard and is doing her absolute best for him.
He has been to two vets. The most recent vet visit was earlier this week. She has spoken to the vet over the phone. Abelard is getting water via syringe. He had been getting forcefed, and recently ate some salmon on his own after "hunting" it. Does that sound like a kitty that's beyond help? It doesn't to me. I'm not chastising people for caring about Abelard, I'm chastising them for being too eager to leap to nasty conclusions and not affording Pat the same courtesy that gets extended to others in this group.
I don't doubt that if Aby turns the corner, stops eating at all and gets no fluid, Pat will make the proper but painful decision. But I also don't doubt that until it becomes obvious there's no hope she's going to do everything she can to help him recover. I am absolutely not convinced that he's beyond hope. It's all up to him now. If he wants to live, he will. I want to keep hearing reports of how Abelard is progressing. If you don't, add Pat to your killfile. I think here treatment so far is reasonable. If you don't, again I'll suggest the killfile. I just really don't want to have to listen to people fighting in here again.
Over the last few weeks it has become difficult to come into RPCA. I love this group, and I depend on this and the other cat group, but it has become very hard to read the messages here strictly because of the bickering, name-calling, and fighting. Sure, it's still a lot more civilized than the kind of stuff you see in r.p.c.h+b, but this is RPCA. We all love cats, we all do our absolute best to care for the cats in our lives, and none of us want to see our furred friends suffer. Why can't we all extend common courtesy and decency to each other? The few really nasty-tempered people who come here sometimes are in my KF so I never see them. I don't want to have to KF any of the regulars here, because they all feel like family to me. Do you like watching people that you love fight with each other? Neither do I - it hurts. All I'm asking is for people to treat this newsgroup like a family unit. Please. If you must fight, PLEASE, go outside to do so.
Dan
Susan M - 22 May 2008 04:37 GMT > Over the last few weeks it has become difficult to come into RPCA. I love > this group, and I depend on this and the other cat group, but it has [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > people to treat this newsgroup like a family unit. Please. If you must > fight, PLEASE, go outside to do so. What Dan said.
Susan M Otis and Chester
bastXXXette@sonic.net - 21 May 2008 19:48 GMT > For some reason, a lot of folks seem to get enraged about Pat. I don't get > it. I know some people have had personal conflicts with her, but please, [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > and chill. And if you really don't like to read what Pat writes, or what I > write, then use your kill file. Don't bombard the rest of us. Thank you, Dan!!
 Signature Joyce
To email me, remove the triple-X from my user name. ^..^
Jack Campin - bogus address - 22 May 2008 00:01 GMT > For some reason, a lot of folks seem to get enraged about Pat. > I don't get it. I know some people have had personal conflicts > with her, but please, don't drag them up here. What Dan said. I can't see that Pat has put a foot wrong in dealing with Abelard's illness.
BTW, labyrinthitis in people has an unpredictable course, ranging from brief and unpleasant to permanently crippling and untreatable. I don't see why it should be any different in cats. If Abelard doesn't make it, I hope nobody even *thinks* of adding to Pat's pain by harassing her over it.
(I had a couple of very mild attacks in my teens - wake up one morning, get up, fall over, vomit, go back to bed and recover in a few hours; it was like an awful hangover. Let's hope Abelard's case is as near as possible to mine).
==== j a c k at c a m p i n . m e . u k === <http://www.campin.me.uk> ==== Jack Campin, 11 Third St, Newtongrange EH22 4PU, Scotland == mob 07800 739 557 CD-ROMs and free stuff: Scottish music, food intolerance, and Mac logic fonts
Marina - 22 May 2008 05:43 GMT > For some reason, a lot of folks seem to get enraged about Pat. I don't get > it. I know some people have had personal conflicts with her, but please, [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > and chill. And if you really don't like to read what Pat writes, or what I > write, then use your kill file. Don't bombard the rest of us. Thanks for this and subsequent posts, Dan. The voice of reason.
We're still purring for Abelard.
 Signature Marina, Miranda and Caliban. In loving memory of Frank and Nikki.
Kreisleriana - 21 May 2008 17:05 GMT > It's still touch-and-go with the Aby cat. > [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > let > me do much of anything aimed at keeping him alive. Still purring here.
 Signature Theresa, Stinky and Dante drtmuirATearthlink.net
Stinky Pictures: http://community.webshots.com/album/125591586JWEFwh
Christina Websell - 21 May 2008 18:34 GMT > It's still touch-and-go with the Aby cat. > [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > let > me do much of anything aimed at keeping him alive. It was at that stage you are at now, when KFC refused to let me syringe feed her or give her her oral antibiotics a few weeks ago that I had her admitted to hospital. She would not eat because her nose was blocked with mucus and she could not smell her food. You have the double whammy of the ear thing going on which can cause nausea. Kitty had the double whammy of her CRF. She is frail anyway and was losing weight at an alarming rate. The vet told me afterwards that if I had not done so she would have died. Today she was sunbatheing in the flower bed. I'm afraid if you cannot get Abelard eating very soon, or get him as an inpatient at the vet so he can get his nutrition via a drip for a few days you will have to seriously consider his future. Which you know, of course. Either he has to get some nutrition into him (which I could not do for KFC and you now can't do for Abelard) or you'll have to have him put to sleep. You cannot let him starve. I know it sounds harsh. I'd like to say your remedies will cure him, but I doubt they will at this stage. My heart goes out to you in this situation.
Tweed
Pat - 21 May 2008 18:40 GMT | It was at that stage you are at now, when KFC refused to let me syringe feed | her or give her her oral antibiotics a few weeks ago that I had her admitted [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] | I know it sounds harsh. I'd like to say your remedies will cure him, but I | doubt they will at this stage. My heart goes out to you in this situation. Thanks, Christina. The good news is, I did in fact get him to eat just a short while after making the OP. Probably posted the updated update whilst you were typing your reply. Aby's cold isn't that bad and seems to be improving, it was worse yesterday. He never did get to the "green mucus" stage, he only had a bit of watery discharge.
It just kills me to see him suffer, but I'm far from ready to give up on him and I know now that he does want to live, but he longs for a bit of the free life he had for almost 5 years before we had to move to town. I'm determined he will have that.
Daniel Mahoney - 21 May 2008 19:33 GMT > Thanks, Christina. The good news is, I did in fact get him to eat just a > short while after making the OP. Probably posted the updated update whilst [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > life he had for almost 5 years before we had to move to town. I'm determined > he will have that. Pat, I know that others have expressed extreme displeasure for the concept, but I would like to strongly suggest that you consider using a small-animal electric fence.
Before everybody over-reacts - small-animal chargers put out a high-enough voltage to get an animal's attention but at such a low current that it won't do any harm. Yes, if you use a 100-acre cattle fencer you'd be endangering your kitties - those things can cause serious burns and could conceivably kill a cat or small dog that got tangled in it. But a fence charge that is DESIGNED to corral cats and small dogs does not present that hazard. And I know for a fact what the shocks feel like because I have touched the fence myself, more than once (sometimes on purpose, sometimes by accident).
When we lived in Highland we faced a dilemma - we had a back yard that was just the right size for kitties to play in. We also had the occasional large dog running loose, so we couldn't take a chance on letting the cats out into the yard without constant supervision. When Sammy and Tabitha figured out how to get to the top of the fence in under 2 seconds even when we were supervising them, the only logical action we could see was to never let them outside again. But when I was at Petsmart the next time, I saw a small-animal fencer. I had either never seen one before, or seen them but never noticed them. I looked over the specs carefully, and did some on-line research, and decided it didn't look too dangerous.
I installed the charged wire about 6 inches below the top of our chain-link fence. Sammy and Tabitha each tried exactly twice to climb out of the fence. When they got to the electric wire they jerked back their paws and stopped climbing. It took just two touches for them to learn that the silver wire bites when you touch it. I left the charger plugged in for another week, then unplugged it. No more kitty escapes from the back yard, and everybody was able to enjoy the fresh air (well, the smoggy and dusty air) to their heart's content.
When we added Ranger and Harri to the family we plugged the charger back in again. After two weeks we again unplugged it. Still no kitty escapes.
So, after personal experience and a good deal of research, I can recommend the use of a small-animal charger as effective, humane, and much better than condemning cats who love open space to always living indoors. My furkids love their outside time, and I believe any cat is smart enough to learn after one or two touches not to go past the charged wire.
Dan
Sherry - 22 May 2008 23:45 GMT > > Thanks, Christina. The good news is, I did in fact get him to eat just a > > short while after making the OP. Probably posted the updated update whilst [quoted text clipped - 51 lines] > > Dan With all due respect, Dan, I think an electric fence to contain a cat is a horrible idea. I keep getting this mental image of an electric wire on top of some kind of hog-wire type fence. The cat gets zapped, then panics, and manages to get himself hung up in the fence. Or second worse case scenario, the cats just gets out anyway. I don't think it's a good idea, I never thought it was a good idea. It has nothing to do with Pat personally. I firmly believe an enclosure is a far better solution. As far as the other issue, Yoda was totally at the brink of death, had stopped eating, was dragging himself by his front legs, and had gone into the closet and wouldn't come out. He was crying and crying and crying. I was ready to put him down. A dear friend on this very group told me that he wasn't crying necessarily out of pain, he was *communicating*. It was about 3 days later he started improving. There's a definite fine line between an animal who's starving himself to death and suffering, and one who is "just about" to turn the corner. It's a tough wait. I'm so glad I did not go with my gut instinct. I've had him 8 more years!
Sherry
Granby - 23 May 2008 00:34 GMT With all due respect Sherry, I have seen these used around where I live. There are a lot of roaming doge and it is either something like this or housecats all the time. I even got up the nerve to touch one of these wires and, am still here. I looked at two of the kities that had been zapped by the wire and, no burns or missing hair from burns. The owner said it only took once or twice. I know of the images from the cartoons where the cats hair stands straight up etc. etc. you do what you have to do to give your cats what they need, even if that is out time. On May 21, 1:33 pm, Daniel Mahoney <d...@catfolks.net> wrote:
> > Thanks, Christina. The good news is, I did in fact get him to eat just a > > short while after making the OP. Probably posted the updated update [quoted text clipped - 55 lines] > > Dan With all due respect, Dan, I think an electric fence to contain a cat is a horrible idea. I keep getting this mental image of an electric wire on top of some kind of hog-wire type fence. The cat gets zapped, then panics, and manages to get himself hung up in the fence. Or second worse case scenario, the cats just gets out anyway. I don't think it's a good idea, I never thought it was a good idea. It has nothing to do with Pat personally. I firmly believe an enclosure is a far better solution. As far as the other issue, Yoda was totally at the brink of death, had stopped eating, was dragging himself by his front legs, and had gone into the closet and wouldn't come out. He was crying and crying and crying. I was ready to put him down. A dear friend on this very group told me that he wasn't crying necessarily out of pain, he was *communicating*. It was about 3 days later he started improving. There's a definite fine line between an animal who's starving himself to death and suffering, and one who is "just about" to turn the corner. It's a tough wait. I'm so glad I did not go with my gut instinct. I've had him 8 more years!
Sherry
Sherry - 23 May 2008 04:36 GMT > With all due respect Sherry, I have seen these used around where I live. > There are a lot of roaming doge and it is either something like this or [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > hair stands straight up etc. etc. you do what you have to do to give your > cats what they need, even if that is out time."Sherry" <sridd...@aol.com> wrote in message Ok, then, educate me. I fully admit I've never seen a working electric fence for cats. I have zero frame of refeence. Are you talking about one of those invisible fences that's regulated by a collar the cat wears? Are you talking about a single-wire contraption that's designed for livestock, run by an electric charger? It just seems to me that the hunting instinct is so strong in a cat, if he/she sees a rabbit, bird, squirrel--he's going to plow through that "invisible fence", electric shock be damned. And he's *sure* not going to go back through the fence to come back home. It just seems to me that the cat's going to end up lost, or neurotic, or both. With the single-wire theory, you've obviously got to have some other kind of fencing, or the cat's going to leap right over it. I assume the single-wire method would work with some other kind of fence, along the top of it, and it zaps the cat when he tries to climb over. This is the one I think is the most dangerous, becuase with the mental picture I have, the cat is going to panic, and risk ending up tangled in the fencing, injured and neurotic. I've seen a cat with his paw hung up dangling from a chainlink fence. It wasn't pretty. Now humor me, please, and enlighten me further....is there some reason an enclosure wouldn't provide a safer access to the outdoors? I'm truly not trying to be wet blanket on this deal. I just *firmly* believe, in my heart of hearts, that cats and eletric fences are not a good mix.
Sherry
Granby - 23 May 2008 04:48 GMT The ones I see are about four inches down from the top of the fence. They are not near as heavy a wire as the ones for cattle and don't have anywhere near the charging power.
Something coming to the top of the fence and jumping over may miss it altogether. As Dan said they only have to encounter it a couple of times to not do it again. I only know Dan through Lee and her DH but I assure you, he would not do anything to hurt his babies.
Hey, did you phone the thing in school where you all joined hands and the teacher hooked up a telephone battery, for science class I think. Well, this was not as strong as that. On May 22, 6:34 pm, "Granby" <s...@joink.com> wrote:
> With all due respect Sherry, I have seen these used around where I live. > There are a lot of roaming doge and it is either something like this or [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > cats what they need, even if that is out time."Sherry" <sridd...@aol.com> > wrote in message Ok, then, educate me. I fully admit I've never seen a working electric fence for cats. I have zero frame of refeence. Are you talking about one of those invisible fences that's regulated by a collar the cat wears? Are you talking about a single-wire contraption that's designed for livestock, run by an electric charger? It just seems to me that the hunting instinct is so strong in a cat, if he/she sees a rabbit, bird, squirrel--he's going to plow through that "invisible fence", electric shock be damned. And he's *sure* not going to go back through the fence to come back home. It just seems to me that the cat's going to end up lost, or neurotic, or both. With the single-wire theory, you've obviously got to have some other kind of fencing, or the cat's going to leap right over it. I assume the single-wire method would work with some other kind of fence, along the top of it, and it zaps the cat when he tries to climb over. This is the one I think is the most dangerous, becuase with the mental picture I have, the cat is going to panic, and risk ending up tangled in the fencing, injured and neurotic. I've seen a cat with his paw hung up dangling from a chainlink fence. It wasn't pretty. Now humor me, please, and enlighten me further....is there some reason an enclosure wouldn't provide a safer access to the outdoors? I'm truly not trying to be wet blanket on this deal. I just *firmly* believe, in my heart of hearts, that cats and eletric fences are not a good mix.
Sherry
Granby - 23 May 2008 04:54 GMT Sorry, I meant the phone battery experiment thing. It is late.
> The ones I see are about four inches down from the top of the fence. They > are not near as heavy a wire as the ones for cattle and don't have [quoted text clipped - 50 lines] > > Sherry Sherry - 23 May 2008 14:39 GMT LOL! I guess that's one childhood experience I missed. I do remember the boys talking about doing something with a phone battery that had to do with fishing. (Can't remember much about it except that my father was highly enraged about it)
My sister and I chased each other with a cattle prod. I guess that's the closest thing I can think of. I'm sure that's a far worse zap than an electric fence though.
Sherry
Pat - 23 May 2008 15:24 GMT My sister and I chased each other with a cattle prod. I guess that's the closest thing I can think of. I'm sure that's a far worse zap than an electric fence though.
Cattle prods I think give 20,000 volts. Police taser guns give 50,000 but are being raised to 75,000. I guess they're not lethal enough as it is....
Taser wants judge to clear it of homicide Stun-gun maker says its weapons don't kill people Tuesday, April 22, 2008
The company that makes Tasers often gets dragged into court. Families have filed dozens of lawsuits claiming the stun-gun-type weapons kill. But it's Taser International that filed the lawsuit being heard this week in Summit County court. It wants a judge to override the county medical examiner by changing her rulings in three deaths from homicide to accidental. It also wants the judge to cross Taser off the record as a cause of death.
WKSU's M.L. Schultze reports: http://www.wksu.org/news/story/21992
Sherry - 23 May 2008 17:37 GMT > My sister and I chased each other with a cattle prod. I guess that's > the closest thing I can think of. I'm sure that's a far worse zap than [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > WKSU's M.L. Schultze reports:http://www.wksu.org/news/story/21992 Oh, I don't have any problem believing tasers can be lethal. I watched a video of some cops *repeatedly* tasering someone. It was hideous. IIRC it was the Barney Fife small-town type of cop, who IMO also be required to carry one bullet in his pocket. I've lived in a small town enough to know what kind of people that job attracts. And it's not people who are policemen for the right reasons. Those people, the truly good people, are in larger towns with better pay. How did I get off on this? Sorry --
Sherry
Granby - 23 May 2008 18:53 GMT Yeah it sure is. On May 22, 10:54 pm, "Granby" <s...@joink.com> wrote:
> Sorry, I meant the phone battery experiment thing. It is late."Granby" > <s...@joink.com> wrote in message > > news:69mt5bF33ekivU1@mid.individual.net... LOL! I guess that's one childhood experience I missed. I do remember the boys talking about doing something with a phone battery that had to do with fishing. (Can't remember much about it except that my father was highly enraged about it)
My sister and I chased each other with a cattle prod. I guess that's the closest thing I can think of. I'm sure that's a far worse zap than an electric fence though.
Sherry
Daniel Mahoney - 23 May 2008 14:34 GMT > It wasn't pretty. > Now humor me, please, and enlighten me further....is there some reason [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Sherry Allow me to clear this up a little.
Electric fences have been around for a long time. There original use was to keep cattle and horses from destroying the fences that were intended to contain them. Many of the the cattle fence chargers in use today put out some extremely hefty voltage at enough current to cause burns. I brushed up against one once. It was a pulsed fence, where the juice is on for about a second, off for around four seconds, etc. During the second that the juice was on I was unable to move off the wire. I have no doubt that a fence like that could do serious injury to a dog or cat, and I wouldn't want to have such a fence anywhere near where my kitties could get to.
The small animal fencer uses the same concept but on a smaller scale. Most of them are still pulsed, but they put out quite a bit less voltage at a lot less current - not enough to do harm. I've grabbed my own fence wire intentionally several times, and I do not have a problem with having a wire charged to that potential where my cats can get to it (at least, not where they can get to it if they're being bad).
The feeling you get when you touch the wire is similar to stepping on something sharp. When a cat touches the charged wire, it will feel like the wire bit them. When you touch something and it bites you, you learn not to touch it any more. If something really unusual was to happen and a cat got stuck with a paw in contact with the wire it would be uncomfortable, but would not do any harm. My background is electrical engineering, and I'm familiar with the established standards for what levels of electrical current are considered to be dangerous. I don't have any worries about a small-animal fencer of the type I've used being harmful to my babies.
In fact, here's an anecdote that you might find interesting. Since I am an electrical engineer by training, I know what kind of damage electrical things can do. Nancy goes crazy some times because of my weird hangups with electricity. If we buy a new electric appliance, I won't allow it be left plugged in until we have spent an entire weekend at home with the new thing plugged in - I want it to do a 48-hour burnin with humans nearby with fire extinguishers in case the device was poorly manufactured. I can't go to sleep with an electric blanket plugged in anywhere in the house - I'm too worried about the fire hazard and freaked out by the potential electromagnetic effects. When a wonderfully kind soul donated a surplus heated kitty bed to Miss Cleopatra, I wouldn't agree to leave it plugged in overnight until it had spent two weekends running ok under supervised conditions. I have too much experience studying how electrical things work and how they are built to trust them on a wholesale basis. But in spite of that wariness, small animal fencers have proven themselves to be safe to my satisfaction. I know beyond a reasonable doubt that they are safe in the sense that they won't catch fire and burn the house down, and safe in the sense that they won't electrocute one of my precious kitties.
By installing the charged wire a few inches down from the top of the fence, the cats can be catly and climb the fence if they really get the urge, they'll just stop before they reach the top. If a really acrobatic cat just jumps to the top of fence without touching the wire, he can easily hop down from the top without touching it either. If you have a cat strong enough to jump to the top of your fence, you've got no choice but to use an enclosure.
I don't like the "invisible fence" collar-based systems, for much the same reason you outlined. If a cat sees a bird or a squirrel and gets up a head of steam, they could charge right through the protected boundary area in such a hurry that they might not even notice the collar shock. But when they started to come back home they would be moving slower, and could well be dissuaded from returning to their own yard because of that same shock collar.
As for the fence vs enclosure question - yes, an enclosure would be an excellent idea and would be far superior to being indoors all day (if, that is, you have a cat who is interested in the outdoors). However, I know that in my back yard in Iowa we have trees, bushes, flowers, and other interesting things that the cats love to explore. There's no way I could put up an enclosure that would encompass all of those cool things. I'd have to pick which of the fun spots the cats could get access to, and my choices would almost certainly not be the same as what the kitties found most interesting.
In my current yard, the entire electric fence question is moot - electric fences don't work well on wooden fences. We are relying on mechanical methods to keep the cats in the yard. But if I had a chain link or other metal fence, I wouldn't hesitate to use a small-animal fencer to give them safe access to the outside.
Dan
Stormmee - 24 May 2008 11:06 GMT a very good explanation, and having grown up on a farm the cattle fencers are completely different from a small yard fence, Lee
> > It wasn't pretty. > > Now humor me, please, and enlighten me further....is there some reason [quoted text clipped - 87 lines] > > Dan Sherry - 24 May 2008 17:19 GMT > a very good explanation, and having grown up on a farm the cattle fencers > are completely different from a small yard fence, LeeDaniel Mahoney <d...@catfolks.net> wrote in message An electric fence charger designed for livestock is the same thing, whether it's in a small yard or not.
Sherry
Granby - 24 May 2008 17:32 GMT Not. This thred is dead, you can not change a persons mind when it has been made up before the conversation starts. On May 24, 5:06 am, "Stormmee" <rgr...@consolidated.net> wrote:
> a very good explanation, and having grown up on a farm the cattle fencers > are completely different from a small yard fence, LeeDaniel Mahoney > <d...@catfolks.net> wrote in message An electric fence charger designed for livestock is the same thing, whether it's in a small yard or not.
Sherry
Pat - 24 May 2008 18:02 GMT | Not. This thred is dead, you can not change a persons mind when it has been | made up before the conversation starts.
| "Sherry" <sriddles@aol.com> wrote | An electric fence charger designed for livestock is the same thing, | whether it's in a small yard or not. Perhaps Sherry simply missed the most salient points of Dan's explanation. In case she did, allow me to reiterate:
"The small animal fencer ... puts out quite a bit less voltage at a lot less current - not enough to do harm"
"If ... a cat got stuck with a paw in contact with the wire it would be uncomfortable, but would not do any harm"
"My background is electrical engineering, and ... I don't have any worries about a small-animal fencer of the type I've used ... small animal fencers have proven themselves to be safe to my satisfaction. I know beyond a reasonable doubt that they are safe in the sense that they won't electrocute one of my precious kitties.... if I had a chain link or other metal fence, I wouldn't hesitate to use a small-animal fencer "
Sherry - 24 May 2008 18:56 GMT > | Not. This thred is dead, you can not change a persons mind when it has > been [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > one of my precious kitties.... if I had a chain link or other metal fence, I > wouldn't hesitate to use a small-animal fencer " Frankly, even though, if I understood correctly, you do have a feed- store type charger and you had planned to string electrical cord into the house, and run the hot wire on top of a welded-wire fence, I'm not that worried about *permanent*, physical damage from electricity itself. I simply don't believe in negative reinforcement "training" for cats. Try zapping a cat with a fence charger for misbehavior in the house. It's not going to help the behavior. The cat is going to keep on doing it, and probably become neurotic and start peeing in floor on top of that. I don't get how everyone seems to think a cat is going to touch one paw on an electric wire, and suddenly remove it go "Duh! I don't think I'll do that again." Watch a cat climb a fence sometime, and see what happens at the top. They're going to scramble, and panic, and probably end up on the other side of the fence. But that's my opinion, and you can do what you want to. If I didn't care about what happens to your cats, I wouldn't have an opinion one way or another. I completely understand your desire to let them have time outdoors. I would, too.
Sherry
Pat - 24 May 2008 20:03 GMT I don't get how everyone seems to think a cat is going to touch one paw on an electric wire, and suddenly remove it go "Duh! I don't think I'll do that again." Watch a cat climb a fence sometime, and see what happens at the top. They're going to scramble, and panic, and probably end up on the other side of the fence.
I understand your sentiments. I would ask how many cats you have witnessed doing this. Dan has described his own experience, and I have seen firsthand how a breeder of small dogs used electrified wire to stop the dogs trying to get out of a yard surrounded by a very low fence. The dogs simply will not go nearer than several inches from the fence. They don't understand electricity, all they know is the fence "bites" if touched. I've seen horses react the same way. Even young foals learn very quickly to avoid the electrictrified fence, and horses are as "reactionary" as cats if not more so.
You need to picture the cat climbing up a wire fence in slow motion to understand how the mechanism works. The cat is putting one paw ahead of (higher than) the other as it climbs, meanwhile it is focused on the goal (the top of the fence). We all know that cats do not notice objects that are right under their noses, rather their focus is farther off. Therefore when the cat has reached the electrified wire about six inches from the top of the fence and the next step is to cross that point, and it reaches upward to grab a higher spot on the fence, its paw/leg must of necessity touch the electrified wire, which then "bites" the cat's paw/leg, and the paw/leg is immediately jerked backward - i.e., back down to the previous stage of the climb.
At this point it would be helpful to have had the experience of touching an electrified wire and the knowledge that the instinctive response to doing so is to instantaneously withdraw one's hand - or in the case of an animal, whatever body part has either inadvertently or in ignorance touched an electrified wire - and most definitely *not* go forward or further *into* the object that delivered the "bite".
Should the cat make a second attempt to continue to the top of the fence, it will again be "bitten" by the wire, with the cat's face close enough to the very thin wire that it does not actually see the wire and thus cannot make the connection between the wire and being "bitten" and thus cannot learn to climb over the fence without touching the wire at all. Even if the cat could make that mental connection, it would still be incapable of climbing the fence without touching the wire. Therefore the cat eventually will "give up" on the prospect of getting over the fence, just as the horse or cow or goat or dog or whatever learns to avoid contact with the fence.
Sherry - 24 May 2008 18:57 GMT > Not. This thred is dead, you can not change a persons mind when it has been > made up before the conversation starts."Sherry" <sridd...@aol.com> wrote in message Great! Then for crying out loud, killfile me, or something, please. Just stop post-humping.
Sherry
Granby - 24 May 2008 19:45 GMT I am sorry I wrote what I did the way I did. I have no intention of KF your posts. Most of the time, I really enjoy them. I just know I won;t change you mind, which is fine, and I won't change mine. What the heck is post humping, or can I ask. On May 24, 11:32 am, "Granby" <s...@joink.com> wrote:
> Not. This thred is dead, you can not change a persons mind when it has > been > made up before the conversation starts."Sherry" <sridd...@aol.com> wrote > in message Great! Then for crying out loud, killfile me, or something, please. Just stop post-humping.
Sherry
Stormmee - 25 May 2008 13:48 GMT you are absolutely correct, so that is why one must get the right equipment, if you use a livestock charger you will have fried cat, Lee On May 24, 5:06 am, "Stormmee" <rgr...@consolidated.net> wrote:
> a very good explanation, and having grown up on a farm the cattle fencers > are completely different from a small yard fence, LeeDaniel Mahoney <d...@catfolks.net> wrote in message An electric fence charger designed for livestock is the same thing, whether it's in a small yard or not.
Sherry
EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) - 21 May 2008 19:54 GMT > It's still touch-and-go with the Aby cat. > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > I guess it's up to him, now, to either get well or die, because he won't let > me do much of anything aimed at keeping him alive. I haven't been following this topic, but I assume you've taken him to the vet. What was the diagnosis/prognosis?
Pat - 21 May 2008 20:02 GMT | I haven't been following this topic, but I assume you've taken him to | the vet. What was the diagnosis/prognosis? Originally, we suspected poison (that was a short-lived idea) but apparently it's just a serious ear infection, for which he is supposed to be taking cephalexin. I say "supposed to be" since he's a very hard cat to pill. I managed reasonably well for the first 12 days but now he's getting more stubborn about being pilled, to the point where I doubt my ability to continue giving the meds. But I will keep trying. This morning I had to dissolve the contents of a capsule in some milk and give it via syringe, and he spit at least half of it out.
Daniel Mahoney - 21 May 2008 20:25 GMT > Originally, we suspected poison (that was a short-lived idea) but apparently > it's just a serious ear infection, for which he is supposed to be taking [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > dissolve the contents of a capsule in some milk and give it via syringe, and > he spit at least half of it out. Pat, could you call the vet again? As I've mentioned before, I know that some veterinary meds can be compounded in transdermal form so they just have to be rubbed into the inside of the ear. Alternatively, many drugs can be compounded into flavors more palatable to cats.
The pharmacy nearest my work offers these compounding services. Please take a look at http://www.medicap.com/FranchiseeLocations/8023/SpecialtyCareCenter.aspx?scccode=2 (my pharmacy is in zip code 50208).
If the vet could tell you whether cephalexin is one of the drugs available for transdermal compounding, or if it can be compounded into something that would taste better to Abelard and the vet might be willing to call the prescription into my pharmacy, I'd be glad to pay for getting a batch compounded and overnighted to you.
Dan
Pat - 21 May 2008 20:36 GMT | Pat, could you call the vet again? This is her day off. Can the pharmacy tell you if this drug is one that can be flavored or made for the ears?
| If the vet could tell you whether cephalexin is one of the drugs available | for transdermal compounding, or if it can be compounded into something | that would taste better to Abelard and the vet might be willing to call | the prescription into my pharmacy, I'd be glad to pay for getting a | batch compounded and overnighted to you. If you can find out before 5 and let me know, I may be able to get another vet to make the call today. Otherwise it will have to wait until tomorrow (if it can be done).
Thanks for the offer.
Daniel Mahoney - 21 May 2008 20:49 GMT > This is her day off. Can the pharmacy tell you if this drug is one that can > be flavored or made for the ears? I'll call and ask. If so, I'll give you a call.
Dan
Daniel Mahoney - 21 May 2008 21:10 GMT Pat, check your email.
Dan
bastXXXette@sonic.net - 21 May 2008 20:02 GMT > It's still touch-and-go with the Aby cat.
> He's getting around much better, but he seems to have a "head cold" and it's > become all but impossible to get anything into his stomach. I've never seen [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > vicinity, and foams profusely at the mouth when nothing at all has been > given. My hands are a total mess. [snip]
It sounds to me like he might need to be in the vet hospital right now. Seems like it's more than you, an individual and not a professional, can manage.
I know money is a major issue. We really need to have an RPCA vet fund again. Any suggestions on how we could do that? I would be willing to set up an account to hold funds. We did this once before, and unfortunately it ended up disasterously, but in this case, nobody else has access to my bank account.
Also, I have a Paypal account, which I have used to pay others with. It's not set up to *receive* money, but I could find out how to do that. I imagine that's not hard.
Would folks be interested in creating such a fund again? I have tried to contact Victor, but he's not responding. Maybe he's out of town.
We shouldn't allow a wonderful cat like Abelard to die because his human can't afford the level of care he apparently needs. There are others in the same position. I'd like to help, and so would several others, but at the moment there doesn't seem to be any organization. Could those of you who are interested in this please respond, either here or by private email? (Remove the XXX's if you email me.)
Thanks, Joyce
To email me, remove the triple-X from my user name. ^..^
Daniel Mahoney - 21 May 2008 20:32 GMT > Would folks be interested in creating such a fund again? I have tried > to contact Victor, but he's not responding. Maybe he's out of town. I'm in. I'd offer the use of my PayPal account, but my bank can be very flaky about transferring funds out of PayPal and I hesitate to trust them for something as important as this.
I'd be glad to set aside a percentage of every paycheck to go to the vet fund. Just tell me where to send it.
Dan
Kyla =^. .^= - 21 May 2008 20:58 GMT "Daniel Mahoney"
>> Would folks be interested in creating such a fund again? I have tried >> to contact Victor, but he's not responding. Maybe he's out of town. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Dan I wish I could help out with money, but being so broke myself, I can't help:( And I feel so bad about that. Hug and sadness Kyla
Stormmee - 22 May 2008 01:42 GMT no need to feel bad, you do your best and you send purrs and prayers and those are just as important, Lee
> "Daniel Mahoney" > >> Would folks be interested in creating such a fund again? I have tried [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > Hug and sadness > Kyla Kyla =^. .^= - 22 May 2008 03:33 GMT Thank you sweetie, I really appreciate your saying that... Hug Kyla "Stormmee"
> no need to feel bad, you do your best and you send purrs and prayers and > those are just as important, Lee [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] >> Hug and sadness >> Kyla Yowie - 21 May 2008 22:02 GMT > > It's still touch-and-go with the Aby cat. > [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] > who are interested in this please respond, either here or by private > email? (Remove the XXX's if you email me.) I can't fault your good intentions, Joyce, and nor do I in any way distrust you, but "once bitten, twice shy" regarding an actual *fund*. The only way I'd suppport pooling our money into one account was if it was set up formally with rules and laws and share holders and all that other legal stuff to ensure that it was always going to be managed properly and that in the case of something happening to you (or whoever was in charge of it), the money wouldn't be considered be part of your estate by law.
I am also concerned these days that it could be scammed. We did have a case here not so long ago when a person posting to RPCA who was allegedly dying of brain cancer (and having many other unfortunate events in her life) turned out to be a total fraud who was milking RPCA's kind and supportive nature for all the attention she could get. Whether it was malicious or a case of Manchausen's syndrom is irrelevant, if that particualr individual had known about an RPCA fund, I am quite sure she would have made several posts about the financial dire straights she was in and how she couldn't afford life saving treatment. And I know, you being such a kind and compassionate person would have felt that using part or all of the RPCA fund to help her would have been a Good Thing (and most people in RPCA would have agreed). But that would have left nothing for a kitty in need if there had been one...
Another concern I have is the allocation of funds if we had a pool of cash. Who makes the decision to donate how much? Is there a flat rate per kitty? Or does however much is needed get given to the first cat in need? What if it as radical but risky surgery? Would we donate $20,000 to do risky surgery and leave nothing for the next cat who really only needs $100 of vetinary care that is guranteed to work?
Personally, if a fund were to be set up that pooled RPCA money, and it had all the legal protection of a trust fund or whatever the legal term is, I think I'd prefer it to be able to offer very low interest, long term *loans* for vetinary services rather than just *giving* money. That would at least prevent scams and people disputing about who got how much money. It would also help prevent people thinking that expensive surgery is 'covered' by the good will of RPCA - it wouldn't be. Each slave woudl still have to pay for said surgery, but wouldn't be hit for a huge bill up front.
Effectively my ideal RPCA fund would more of a loan account or even an insurance fund than just a pool of money we give to people when the ask.
Given the above complications, the standard method of financial support since the original fund's demise has been for each individual to give money to the vet in question. Even I've rung up vets inthe USA and after making sure they udnerstood my accent (sometimes its difficult) and that they could take an Australian credit card, I've been able to make a small donation to several different vetinary accounts. This system allows people to donate as much or as little to each situation as they see fit and their finances allow, knowing that their money can't possibly be going to anything else besides vetinary services, and that the 'emergency' was real.
Even if you do set up a fund, Joyce, it going to take a bit of time, time that Abelard probably cant afford. In the meanwhile, does anyone know the contact details of Abelard's vet?
Yowie
Pat - 21 May 2008 22:42 GMT | contact details of Abelard's vet? I will supply that info if/when it is needed.
About the fund, I've been thinking along the same lines you outlined, a website modeled after Dr. Keith Taylor's ModestNeeds.org. One of these days when I have enough time I will make it a reality. Meanwhile I seek suggestions for a domain name.
Magic Mood Jeep © - 22 May 2008 00:09 GMT > | contact details of Abelard's vet? > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > when I have enough time I will make it a reality. Meanwhile I seek > suggestions for a domain name. Somehow or another, I found this - I think through either the HSUS or ASPCA web site, or there was a story on an online news.... or maybe it was here? It's the Feline Veterinary Emergency Assistance Program.
http://www.fveap.org/sys-tmpl/door/
>^..^< This is Kitty. Copy and paste Kitty into your signature to help her wipe out Bunny's world domination. -- The ONE and ONLY lefthanded-pathetic-paranoid-psychotic-sarcastic-wiseass-ditzy former-blonde in Bloomington! (And proud of it, too)© email me at nalee1964 (at) comcast (dot) net http://community.webshots.com/user/mgcmdjeep
Pat - 22 May 2008 01:24 GMT | Somehow or another, I found this - I think through either the HSUS or | ASPCA web site, or there was a story on an online news.... or maybe it | was here? It's the Feline Veterinary Emergency Assistance Program. | | http://www.fveap.org/sys-tmpl/door/ Yes, I found several more like it when I was researching how to set up a program. Every single one I found talked about how difficult it is to actually get funded through them.
bastXXXette@sonic.net - 21 May 2008 23:02 GMT > I can't fault your good intentions, Joyce, and nor do I in any way distrust > you, but "once bitten, twice shy" regarding an actual *fund*. The only way [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > the case of something happening to you (or whoever was in charge of it), the > money wouldn't be considered be part of your estate by law. I agree with there being rules, and I also understand that we would need to decide when, how much, and to whom funds would be donated. Loans would be good, too, for those who knew they could pay it back. I would prefer to use an honor system for that, though.
Anyway, all that would be a reasonable discussion to have. As for a trust fund, with all the legal bells and whistles, while I don't oppose the idea, I'm not volunteering to engineer it. :) If someone else wanted to do that, I would support it, but if I were setting something up, I would go with simplicity.
> Given the above complications, the standard method of financial support > since the original fund's demise has been for each individual to give money > to the vet in question. Even I've rung up vets inthe USA and after making > sure they udnerstood my accent (sometimes its difficult) and that they could > take an Australian credit card, I've been able to make a small donation to > several different vetinary accounts. One problem I have with this is that I would be calling a phone number which (in some cases) I have no proof is an actual vet's office, and giving them my credit card number. Someone could easily pretend to have a sick cat, post their own phone number or that of an accomplice, and then answer the phone as "XYZ Vet Hospital". How would any of us know this wasn't the case? Especially if it's in a different country.
This is why I like the paypal idea best, ie, what Victor has done. People could donate to the paypal account, and the owner of that account could then send a check (or a series of checks) to that vet's office. If Victor isn't available, someone else (such as myself) could be a backup person. This could work whether or not there is a fund.
 Signature Joyce
To email me, remove the triple-X from my user name. ^..^
Pat - 21 May 2008 23:19 GMT | calling a phone number which (in some cases) I have no proof is | an actual vet's office, and giving them my credit card number. | Someone could easily pretend to have a sick cat, post their own | phone number or that of an accomplice, and then answer as | "XYZ Vet Hospital". How would any of us know this wasn't the | case? Especially if it's in a different country. For the USA, Canada and England, and perhaps (probably) other countries, there are online yellow page directories, and most vets will be listed in them. Some will have their own websites, or at least a listing with their city's chamber of commerce or business directory, and the phone numbers will match up.
Yowie - 21 May 2008 23:38 GMT >> I can't fault your good intentions, Joyce, and nor do I in any way >> distrust you, but "once bitten, twice shy" regarding an actual [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > Loans would be good, too, for those who knew they could pay it back. > I would prefer to use an honor system for that, though. I could go with an honour system - I don't think any of us could afford the legal fees to chase up "bad debt". Can you imagine RPCA being the cause of The Repo Man? LOL
> Anyway, all that would be a reasonable discussion to have. As for a > trust fund, with all the legal bells and whistles, while I don't [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > would any of us know this wasn't the case? Especially if it's in a > different country. I have good Google-fu. I have checked each address and phone number with the ones listed in the phone directory that is publically available on the internet. So far, the details have matched :-)
> This is why I like the paypal idea best, ie, what Victor has done. > People could donate to the paypal account, and the owner of that > account could then send a check (or a series of checks) to that vet's > office. If Victor isn't available, someone else (such as myself) > could be a backup person. This could work whether or not there is a > fund. Fair enough. The system we currently have is working pretty well, then :-)
Yowie
Christina Websell - 22 May 2008 00:51 GMT "Yowie" <yowie9644.DIESPAMDIE@yahoo.com.au> wrote in >>
>> [snip] > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > posts about the financial dire straights she was in and how she couldn't > afford life saving treatment. Yes, I remember that well. It came to light that she was a fraud - and was very believable for a while - only a few weeks before I got my diagnosis of ovarian cancer in 2005. So when I told you all, I wondered "will they believe me?"
I've sent money on two occasions for vet's bills. Once to someone who never posted again after the bill was paid, and once to a regular here who never acknowledged it.
I don't know what the answer is. It would be nice to have a vet fund for regular posters who fall on hard times, but how it would be administrated I don't know. I wouldn't want that job of deciding if megabucks were in order from the fund or just a little to help.
OTOH, I cannot think of much worse than knowing your cat could be saved if only you had more money. And you haven't so they have to go to RB.
Tweed
Stormmee - 22 May 2008 01:50 GMT I guess I wasn't reading when that fraud happened, and I think I am glad I missed that, I like the system victor has used... and I think all we need is a back up person with the same system, Lee
> "Yowie" <yowie9644.DIESPAMDIE@yahoo.com.au> wrote in >> > >> [snip] [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > > Tweed Yowie - 22 May 2008 05:13 GMT > "Yowie" <yowie9644.DIESPAMDIE@yahoo.com.au> wrote in >> >>> [snip] [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > who never posted again after the bill was paid, and once to a regular > here who never acknowledged it. I don't know the person who took the money and ran, so to speak, but when donating for the 'regular' was there truly nothing said in group about it? I can't imagine a regular being that rude as to not at least give a blanket thanks - depending on how it was done, they may not know (and have no way of finding out) exactly who donated what.
Yowie
bastXXXette@sonic.net - 22 May 2008 07:17 GMT >> I've sent money on two occasions for vet's bills. Once to someone >> who never posted again after the bill was paid, and once to a regular >> here who never acknowledged it.
> I don't know the person who took the money and ran, so to speak, but when > donating for the 'regular' was there truly nothing said in group about it? I > can't imagine a regular being that rude as to not at least give a blanket > thanks - depending on how it was done, they may not know (and have no way of > finding out) exactly who donated what. Well, I certainly hope it wasn't me! I received donations for a large vet bill in 2005. I remember sending blanket thanks to the newsgroup, as well as sending private email to individuals I was aware of - some folks donated anonymously.
Tweed, I've tried to send you email on a few occasions, but it always bounced back as undeliverable. This is after I remove the "spamfree" from your address and change the appropriate "." to a "@". I don't remember what happened almost 3 years ago, but that might have been it. (Assuming I'm the "regular" you're talking about.)
 Signature Joyce
To email me, remove the triple-X from my user name. ^..^
Christina Websell - 22 May 2008 17:39 GMT > >> I've sent money on two occasions for vet's bills. Once to someone > >> who never posted again after the bill was paid, and once to a regular [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > remember what happened almost 3 years ago, but that might have been it. > (Assuming I'm the "regular" you're talking about.) No, it wasn't you, Joyce.
bastXXXette@sonic.net - 22 May 2008 20:42 GMT > <bastXXXette@sonic.net> wrote in message
>> Christina Websell wrote:
>>> I've sent money on two occasions for vet's bills. Once to someone >>> who never posted again after the bill was paid, and once to a regular >>> here who never acknowledged it.
>> Well, I certainly hope it wasn't me!
> No, it wasn't you, Joyce. Whew!!
It's still unfortunate that someone else accepted your generosity without bothering to thank you. I'm just glad I wasn't that rude!!!
 Signature Joyce
To email me, remove the triple-X from my user name. ^..^
Charleen Welton - 22 May 2008 13:40 GMT Tweed, I'm sorry that you had two bad experiences when you gave from your heart and pocketbook. I want to explain how things worked with the donations that were sent in for Four and an idea that came out of your comment. All the dontions that went to Victor's Pay Pal account were sent to St. Francis Vet Hospital in two of Victor's personal checks. So I would not have any information from the vet of who sent what amount. When the final amount was sent in to Victor he email to me a sheet with the dates, amounts, countries they came from and the total amount. The names were blured out. It didn't matter to me who sent what amount. But I realize, based on your comment, that I should have asked Victor for a list of the persons who donated without the amounts and contacted each thanking them individually.
Tweed, I don't know if you were referring to this situation but your comment brought about a good change, thank you. Charleen
> "Yowie" <yowie9644.DIESPAMDIE@yahoo.com.au> wrote in >> >>> [snip] [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > > Tweed Charleen Welton - 21 May 2008 22:38 GMT I'm in. The memory of Four and all the help he received will be gladly and gratefully be paid back as finances allow. Charleen
> > It's still touch-and-go with the Aby cat. > [quoted text clipped - 39 lines] > > To email me, remove the triple-X from my user name. ^..^ Stormmee - 22 May 2008 01:41 GMT it seems that Victor was going out of town, Mexico maybe for a longish stay, Lee
> > It's still touch-and-go with the Aby cat. > [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > > To email me, remove the triple-X from my user name. ^..^ Irulan - 22 May 2008 01:56 GMT I would be willing to put in a few dollars now and then for the vet fund. Let us know the how's, when's and where's.
Lily & her mama
 Signature Irulan from the stars we come to the stars we return from now until the end of time.
> > It's still touch-and-go with the Aby cat. > [quoted text clipped - 39 lines] > > To email me, remove the triple-X from my user name. ^..^ kilikini - 21 May 2008 23:52 GMT > It's still touch-and-go with the Aby cat. > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > I guess it's up to him, now, to either get well or die, because he > won't let me do much of anything aimed at keeping him alive. DAMN, DAMN, DAMN! I can't imagine what you're going through, Pat. I don't know what to say. All I can give are purrs in your direction.
kili
Matthew - 22 May 2008 00:59 GMT still purring and praying
> It's still touch-and-go with the Aby cat. > [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > let > me do much of anything aimed at keeping him alive. Pat - 22 May 2008 01:28 GMT We went out again, this time for a longer walk, and a much larger meal. Kitty is happy for the time being but it's nearly time for the pill ordeal again. Hope it can be less stressful this time.
bastXXXette@sonic.net - 22 May 2008 01:49 GMT > We went out again, this time for a longer walk, and a much larger meal. > Kitty is happy for the time being but it's nearly time for the pill ordeal > again. Hope it can be less stressful this time. Maybe you can try to pill him outdoors? He might be more amenable to it then. Smudge puts up with much more stuff from me when we're outside, although I have to admit I've never tried to pill her outside. Might be worth a try. Are you taking him on a leash?
 Signature Joyce
To email me, remove the triple-X from my user name. ^..^
Pat - 22 May 2008 04:50 GMT | Pat <just_a_ghost@in_this_house.com> wrote: | [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] | although I have to admit I've never tried to pill her outside. Might be | worth a try. Are you taking him on a leash? He usually goes in harness with leash but not today, he's not able to run yet and anyway he wanted to stick close to me. Earlier in the day, before he accepted the salmon - I was fully expecting him to refuse it and only brought the package out to suck some of the juice into a syringe to give him - he refused to drink salmon juice from the syringe, and getting a pill into him lately is about 600x harder than giving any liquids by mouth.
I think he objects to the use of force (and I don't blame him for that - thinking back to when I was a child and how hard I fought anything done to me by force, whether a doctor, nurse, parent, relative, teacher, you name it, I refused it ON PRINCIPLE. Many's the time I kicked a doctor/nurse in the shins when they tried to inject me with something, and when they wanted my tonsils, I actually ran away from home!)
MatSav - 22 May 2008 07:38 GMT > ... before he [Abelard] > accepted the salmon - I was fully expecting him to refuse it > and only > brought the package out to suck some of the juice into a > syringe to give > him - he refused to drink salmon juice from the syringe,... Can't say I'm surprised. Have you tasted said juice? It may have been very salty!
 Signature MatSav
Pat - 22 May 2008 07:50 GMT | > ... before he [Abelard] | > accepted the salmon - I was fully expecting him to refuse it [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] | Can't say I'm surprised. Have you tasted said juice? It may have | been very salty! No, I've never tasted the juice of fresh raw salmon. I like the salty juice that canned salmon is packed in, and so do all the cats (they beg for it when I open a can, but they never get it all, haha!). Abelard drank the stuff from the palm of my hand, but would not take it from the syringe.
Rhonda - 22 May 2008 06:46 GMT Pat, if he will not take the pills but you are able to do sub-cu fluids, how about getting the medicine in indictable form? I don't know what he's taking, but I'm sure he would have a better chance if he gets his medicine -- especially if it is antibiotics for an infection.
How about calling the vet asap and seeing if they will give you syringes and indictable meds? Our vet has done that.
Rhonda
> It's still touch-and-go with the Aby cat. > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > I guess it's up to him, now, to either get well or die, because he won't let > me do much of anything aimed at keeping him alive. Pat - 22 May 2008 07:13 GMT | Pat, if he will not take the pills but you are able to do sub-cu fluids, | how about getting the medicine in indictable form? I don't know what [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] | How about calling the vet asap and seeing if they will give you syringes | and indictable meds? Our vet has done that. Now there's a good idea. If I was less stressed out I might have though of it myself. I'll see what the vet says in the morning.
Rhonda - 22 May 2008 08:30 GMT > | Pat, if he will not take the pills but you are able to do sub-cu fluids, > | how about getting the medicine in indictable form? I don't know what [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Now there's a good idea. If I was less stressed out I might have though of > it myself. I'll see what the vet says in the morning. OMG, I spell-checked it and trusted the computer to change to the right spelling without paying attention, ha! I'm glad you were able to know I meant injectable.
Hope it helps, now I'd better sleep.
Rhonda
bastXXXette@sonic.net - 22 May 2008 09:49 GMT > OMG, I spell-checked it and trusted the computer to change to the right > spelling without paying attention, ha! I'm glad you were able to know I > meant injectable. I figured that's what it *meant*, but I thought this was a specific, veterinary-jargon meaning for "indictable". :) But you really don't want to put something indictable into your kitty, do you? :)
 Signature Joyce
To email me, remove the triple-X from my user name. ^..^
Rhonda - 23 May 2008 04:07 GMT > > OMG, I spell-checked it and trusted the computer to change to the right > > spelling without paying attention, ha! I'm glad you were able to know I [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > veterinary-jargon meaning for "indictable". :) But you really don't > want to put something indictable into your kitty, do you? :) No, you're right. But maybe it's a good way to get rid of evidence?
Rhonda
|
|
|