Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / Cat Anecdotes / May 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Abelard Update

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Pat - 21 May 2008 15:02 GMT
It's still touch-and-go with the Aby cat.

He's getting around much better, but he seems to have a "head cold" and it's
become all but impossible to get anything into his stomach. I've never seen
anything like the behavior he's exhibiting. There's no way to get a pill
into him now. Just absolutely no way. You can't even get close to his mouth
with one, he thrashes so violently and snaps, bites anything in the
vicinity, and foams profusely at the mouth when nothing at all has been
given. My hands are a total mess.

And of course he still won't eat or drink - at least, I haven't seen him do
so, and I don't think he's sneaking food, because he continues growing
thinner. Being that it's so very difficult to administer anything, I've
started injecting 50cc of 0.45% saline solution under the skin once a day,
and he's starting to get impatient with that. I might be able to get away
with it one or two more times before it becomes as difficult as giving water
by mouth with a syringe.

I guess it's up to him, now, to either get well or die, because he won't let
me do much of anything aimed at keeping him alive.
Adrian - 21 May 2008 15:30 GMT
> It's still touch-and-go with the Aby cat.
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> I guess it's up to him, now, to either get well or die, because he
> won't let me do much of anything aimed at keeping him alive.

Continuing purrs.
Signature

Adrian (Owned by Snoopy, Bagheera & Shadow)
Cats leave pawprints on your heart
http://community.webshots.com/user/clowderuk

hopitus - 21 May 2008 16:55 GMT
> It's still touch-and-go with the Aby cat.
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> I guess it's up to him, now, to either get well or die, because he won't let
> me do much of anything aimed at keeping him alive.

(barf) and if you are really demented enough to ask me why or begin
your
abusive ravings again (yeah, this 'creature' several states over from
you is
now seething hatred and venom, all right, you &&((#&****!!! ) and
pardon me Kyla, nothing personal: VET VET VET VET VET VET VET VET VET
VET
I have lost it. This ongoing torture of a helpless pet is much worse
than imagining your 'electrocution fence'  to keep your cats in your
yard.
If you have any brains left at all, don't post us describing Aby's
death throes. You sicken me, bigtime. "Up to him".......my God.
Daniel Mahoney - 21 May 2008 17:17 GMT
> If you have any brains left at all, don't post us describing Aby's
> death throes. You sicken me, bigtime. "Up to him".......my God.

Did you miss yesterday afternoon's post about her talk with the vet? Where
the vet told her to not force feed and give it 24 hours?

Calm the f**k down! Everybody, I really don't care whether you like Pat or
not, the fact is that she's talking to the vet regularly and taking the
cat in to see the vet when appropriate. She's being diligent about caring
about Abelard. He went in to see the vet several times - first to an
a**hole vet, then to a better vet. And Pat has been in touch with the vet
by telephone often.

Abelard is in the position many sick cats are - if they want to get
better, they will. If they don't, they won't. If a cat doesn't want to get
better, nothing the vet can do will make a difference.

For some reason, a lot of folks seem to get enraged about Pat. I don't get
it. I know some people have had personal conflicts with her, but please,
don't drag them up here. We've got enough nasty crap going on without
personal attacks taking place on RPCA. PLEASE! Everybody just take a deep
breath and chill. I'm sorry if I piss some people off, but I depend on
RPCA and it's a major part of my life, and I get pissed off myself when
people get nasty here. This is the internet, folks - take a deep breath
and chill. And if you really don't like to read what Pat writes, or what I
write, then use your kill file. Don't bombard the rest of us.

Dan
jmcquown - 21 May 2008 17:48 GMT
>> If you have any brains left at all, don't post us describing Aby's
>> death throes. You sicken me, bigtime. "Up to him".......my God.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> don't get it. I know some people have had personal conflicts with
> her, but please, don't drag them up here.

While I understand your position (and am happy she's in regular contact with
the vet), Pat herself dragged up all the personal issues.  I'm minding my
own business, reading posts, when I suddenly find her talking about *me*,
dragging up something that happened years ago.  This despite the fact I
haven't said boo to her since she stormed out of the group... how long ago
now?  I'm not about to sit on my hands and take something like that without
responding, especially since she has a highly selective memory.

> We've got enough nasty crap
> going on without personal attacks taking place on RPCA. PLEASE!

I respect your feelings, Dan, which is why I stopped reading or replying to
any of
HER posts.  I wish Abelard the best.  Pat I couldn't care less about.

Jill
Daniel Mahoney - 21 May 2008 17:58 GMT
But at the same time you've not posted nastiness directed her where we all
have to read it. Thank you! That's all I'm asking for.

I realize that Pat has initiated some of the nastiness. I'm just asking
that if people really, really feel a need to post nastiness, that they
consider doing it via e-mail. When I see that kind of nastiness I
generally just click "Ignore Thread" but I'm not willing to do that when
the health of a kitty is in question. If you must handle the post via
Usenet, please do something like labeling the post with "PERSONAL:" at the
start of the subject so that those of us who don't want to read the
nastiness don't have to.

This group is like a family. Most of the people generally get along really
well. A few of the people don't. And like in family gatherings, the folks
who don't get along really ought to air their differences in private, not
subject the rest of the family to the violence.

To those who have repressed their urges to post unkind or angry messages,
thank you, thank you, thank you.

Dan
Pat - 21 May 2008 18:21 GMT
| To those who have repressed their urges to post unkind or angry messages,
| thank you, thank you, thank you.

I concur. And thank *you* Dan.

I guess I wasn't pay close enough attention to the kitty, or the right kind
of attention. What I needed to do was to "read" him with more sensitivity,
and shortly after making the last post, I "tuned in" as best I could, and
learned that what he really wanted to go out and absorb some natural
sunlight. So we went hunting.

I got a few strange looks from passersby as I crawled around in the grass
with Aby. He was absolutely thrilled to be out, strolling and rolling around
in the grass, purring up a storm, headbutting me over and over and
exercising his claws on anything that looked inviting. After a while, I
slipped into the kitchen and grabbed a knife and the package of salmon I had
thawed last night for my lunch. I figured if he's gonna eat anything, this
would be it. And I was right, he devoured the salmon greedily with no
encouragement from me!

So I think he really needs is to be out in nature regularly. They all do. I
*must* get that fence finished!!
Stormmee - 21 May 2008 17:51 GMT
I was so right about your character when I let you adopt Harri, Lee
> > If you have any brains left at all, don't post us describing Aby's
> > death throes. You sicken me, bigtime. "Up to him".......my God.
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> Dan
CatNipped - 21 May 2008 18:14 GMT
>> If you have any brains left at all, don't post us describing Aby's
>> death throes. You sicken me, bigtime. "Up to him".......my God.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> better, they will. If they don't, they won't. If a cat doesn't want to get
> better, nothing the vet can do will make a difference.

The vet can give an animal a peaceful, merciful death.  Allowing an animal
to suffer and die on its own is a horrible thing to envisage.  Starving to
death is *not* painless.  Knowing that Hunter died at home alone, even
though we were told it was probably instantaneous and painless, still haunts
us with "what ifs" and "we should haves".

> For some reason, a lot of folks seem to get enraged about Pat. I don't get
> it. I know some people have had personal conflicts with her, but please,
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Dan

Dan, I love you dearly, but please don't ask anyone here to ignore the
torture Pat is making Abelard endure.  Hopitus is rightfully angry at Pat's
dramatic posts describing Abelard's decline - it is excruciating to witness
this even second hand.  Yes we can killfile Pat, but does that help
Abelard - do we just ignore his suffering?  I know Pat is your friend, and
as her friend maybe you should advise her on ending Abelard's suffering
rather than defending her actions and chastising someone for caring about
Abelard.

Hugs,

CatNipped
Daniel Mahoney - 21 May 2008 19:09 GMT
> Dan, I love you dearly, but please don't ask anyone here to ignore the
> torture Pat is making Abelard endure.  Hopitus is rightfully angry at
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Abelard's suffering rather than defending her actions and chastising
> someone for caring about Abelard.

The thing is, I am NOT convinced that Abelard is dieing! Everybody is
hopping on the bandwagon to criticize her, when he was eating a little bit
yesterday or late the day before, and now her recent post tells us that he
ate a little more today.

I have no doubt that if Abelard stopped eating entirely Pat would take him
to see the vet. Sure, he's stopped eating for a day at a time. That
happens sometimes. Yes, he's losing weight that he would be better not
losing. Does that mean he's at risk of hepatic lipidosis? I don't know -
I'm not there to look at him. But Pat's vet has, and Pat is either taking
Abelard to the vet or talking to the vet describing his progress.

I am not convinced that Abelard is beyond help, nor is he at the point
that Pat should be thinking about having him PTS. I think that she's
taking every step she can to get him to eat and drink short of applying
inappropriate violence. Would you rather see a kitty who could yet recover
and live a happy life in a loving home put to sleep prematurely, or see
his caring human join him in fighting this illness? To me, that's what Pat
is doing.

If I start to believe that she's prolonging pointless agony, then I'll
recommend the final trip to the vet. But he isn't there yet, and everybody
needs to TAKE A DEEP BREATH, reread what she's posted about what she has
done and is doing, and realize that she loves Abelard and is doing her
absolute best for him.

He has been to two vets. The most recent vet visit was earlier this week.
She has spoken to the vet over the phone. Abelard is getting water via
syringe. He had been getting forcefed, and recently ate some salmon on
his own after "hunting" it. Does that sound like a kitty that's beyond
help? It doesn't to me. I'm not chastising people for caring about
Abelard, I'm chastising them for being too eager to leap to nasty
conclusions and not affording Pat the same courtesy that gets extended to
others in this group.

I don't doubt that if Aby turns the corner, stops eating at all and gets
no fluid, Pat will make the proper but painful decision. But I also don't
doubt that until it becomes obvious there's no hope she's going to do
everything she can to help him recover. I am absolutely not convinced that
he's beyond hope. It's all up to him now. If he wants to live, he will. I
want to keep hearing reports of how Abelard is progressing. If you don't,
add Pat to your killfile. I think here treatment so far is reasonable. If
you don't, again I'll suggest the killfile. I just really don't want to
have to listen to people fighting in here again.

Over the last few weeks it has become difficult to come into RPCA. I love
this group, and I depend on this and the other cat group, but it has
become very hard to read the messages here strictly because of the
bickering, name-calling, and fighting. Sure, it's still a lot more
civilized than the kind of stuff you see in r.p.c.h+b, but this is RPCA.
We all love cats, we all do our absolute best to care for the cats in our
lives, and none of us want to see our furred friends suffer. Why can't we
all extend common courtesy and decency to each other? The few really
nasty-tempered people who come here sometimes are in my KF so I never see
them. I don't want to have to KF any of the regulars here, because they
all feel like family to me. Do you like watching people that you love
fight with each other? Neither do I - it hurts. All I'm asking is for
people to treat this newsgroup like a family unit. Please. If you must
fight, PLEASE, go outside to do so.

Dan
Susan M - 22 May 2008 04:37 GMT
> Over the last few weeks it has become difficult to come into RPCA. I love
> this group, and I depend on this and the other cat group, but it has
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> people to treat this newsgroup like a family unit. Please. If you must
> fight, PLEASE, go outside to do so.

What Dan said.

Susan M
Otis and Chester
bastXXXette@sonic.net - 21 May 2008 19:48 GMT
> For some reason, a lot of folks seem to get enraged about Pat. I don't get
> it. I know some people have had personal conflicts with her, but please,
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> and chill. And if you really don't like to read what Pat writes, or what I
> write, then use your kill file. Don't bombard the rest of us.

Thank you, Dan!!

Signature

Joyce

To email me, remove the triple-X from my user name.  ^..^

Jack Campin - bogus address - 22 May 2008 00:01 GMT
> For some reason, a lot of folks seem to get enraged about Pat.
> I don't get it. I know some people have had personal conflicts
> with her, but please, don't drag them up here.

What Dan said.  I can't see that Pat has put a foot wrong in dealing
with Abelard's illness.

BTW, labyrinthitis in people has an unpredictable course, ranging
from brief and unpleasant to permanently crippling and untreatable.
I don't see why it should be any different in cats.  If Abelard
doesn't make it, I hope nobody even *thinks* of adding to Pat's
pain by harassing her over it.

(I had a couple of very mild attacks in my teens - wake up one
morning, get up, fall over, vomit, go back to bed and recover in
a few hours; it was like an awful hangover.  Let's hope Abelard's
case is as near as possible to mine).

==== j a c k  at  c a m p i n . m e . u k  ===  <http://www.campin.me.uk> ====
Jack Campin, 11 Third St, Newtongrange EH22 4PU, Scotland == mob 07800 739 557
CD-ROMs and free stuff:  Scottish music, food intolerance, and Mac logic fonts
Marina - 22 May 2008 05:43 GMT
> For some reason, a lot of folks seem to get enraged about Pat. I don't get
> it. I know some people have had personal conflicts with her, but please,
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> and chill. And if you really don't like to read what Pat writes, or what I
> write, then use your kill file. Don't bombard the rest of us.

Thanks for this and subsequent posts, Dan. The voice of reason.

We're still purring for Abelard.

Signature

Marina, Miranda and Caliban. In loving memory of Frank and Nikki.

Kreisleriana - 21 May 2008 17:05 GMT
> It's still touch-and-go with the Aby cat.
>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> let
> me do much of anything aimed at keeping him alive.

Still purring here.

Signature

Theresa, Stinky and Dante
drtmuirATearthlink.net

Stinky Pictures: http://community.webshots.com/album/125591586JWEFwh

Christina Websell - 21 May 2008 18:34 GMT
> It's still touch-and-go with the Aby cat.
>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> let
> me do much of anything aimed at keeping him alive.

It was at that stage you are at now, when KFC refused to let me syringe feed
her or give her her oral antibiotics a few weeks ago that I had her admitted
to hospital.
She would not eat because her nose was blocked with mucus and she could not
smell her food.  You have the double whammy of the ear thing going on which
can cause nausea.  Kitty had the double whammy of her CRF.  She is frail
anyway and was losing weight at an alarming rate.
The vet told me afterwards that if I had not done so she would have died.
Today she was sunbatheing in the flower bed.
I'm afraid if you cannot get Abelard eating very soon, or get him as an
inpatient at the vet so he can get his nutrition via a drip for a few days
you will have to seriously consider his future.  Which you know, of course.
Either he has to get some nutrition into him (which I could not do for KFC
and you now can't do for Abelard) or you'll have to have him put to sleep.
You cannot let him starve.
I know it sounds harsh.  I'd like to say your remedies will cure him, but I
doubt they will at this stage.  My heart goes out to you in this situation.

Tweed
Pat - 21 May 2008 18:40 GMT
| It was at that stage you are at now, when KFC refused to let me syringe feed
| her or give her her oral antibiotics a few weeks ago that I had her admitted
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
| I know it sounds harsh.  I'd like to say your remedies will cure him, but I
| doubt they will at this stage.  My heart goes out to you in this situation.

Thanks, Christina. The good news is, I did in fact get him to eat just a
short while after making the OP. Probably posted the updated update whilst
you were typing your reply. Aby's cold isn't that bad and seems to be
improving, it was worse yesterday. He never did get to the "green mucus"
stage, he only had a bit of watery discharge.

It just kills me to see him suffer, but I'm far from ready to give up on him
and I know now that he does want to live, but he longs for a bit of the free
life he had for almost 5 years before we had to move to town. I'm determined
he will have that.
Daniel Mahoney - 21 May 2008 19:33 GMT
> Thanks, Christina. The good news is, I did in fact get him to eat just a
> short while after making the OP. Probably posted the updated update whilst
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> life he had for almost 5 years before we had to move to town. I'm determined
> he will have that.

Pat, I know that others have expressed extreme displeasure for the
concept, but I would like to strongly suggest that you consider using a
small-animal electric fence.

Before everybody over-reacts - small-animal chargers put out a high-enough
voltage to get an animal's attention but at such a low current that it
won't do any harm. Yes, if you use a 100-acre cattle fencer you'd be
endangering your kitties - those things can cause serious burns and could
conceivably kill a cat or small dog that got tangled in it. But a fence
charge that is DESIGNED to corral cats and small dogs does not present
that hazard. And I know for a fact what the shocks feel like because I
have touched the fence myself, more than once (sometimes on purpose,
sometimes by accident).

When we lived in Highland we faced a dilemma - we had a back yard that was
just the right size for kitties to play in. We also had the occasional
large dog running loose, so we couldn't take a chance on letting the cats
out into the yard without constant supervision. When Sammy and Tabitha
figured out how to get to the top of the fence in under 2 seconds even
when we were supervising them, the only logical action we could see was to
never let them outside again. But when I was at Petsmart the next time, I
saw a small-animal fencer. I had either never seen one before, or seen
them but never noticed them. I looked over the specs carefully, and did
some on-line research, and decided it didn't look too dangerous.

I installed the charged wire about 6 inches below the top of our
chain-link fence. Sammy and Tabitha each tried exactly twice to climb out
of the fence. When they got to the electric wire they jerked back their
paws and stopped climbing. It took just two touches for them to learn that
the silver wire bites when you touch it. I left the charger plugged in for
another week, then unplugged it. No more kitty escapes from the back yard,
and everybody was able to enjoy the fresh air (well, the smoggy and dusty
air) to their heart's content.

When we added Ranger and Harri to the family we plugged the charger back
in again. After two weeks we again unplugged it. Still no kitty escapes.

So, after personal experience and a good deal of research, I can recommend
the use of a small-animal charger as effective, humane, and much better
than condemning cats who love open space to always living indoors. My
furkids love their outside time, and I believe any cat is smart enough to
learn after one or two touches not to go past the charged wire.

Dan
Sherry - 22 May 2008 23:45 GMT
> > Thanks, Christina. The good news is, I did in fact get him to eat just a
> > short while after making the OP. Probably posted the updated update whilst
[quoted text clipped - 51 lines]
>
> Dan

With all due respect, Dan, I think an electric fence to contain a cat
is a
horrible idea. I keep getting this mental image of an electric wire on
top of some kind of hog-wire type fence. The cat gets zapped, then
panics, and manages to get himself hung up in the fence. Or second
worse case scenario,
the cats just gets out anyway. I don't think it's a good idea, I never
thought it was a good idea. It has nothing to do with Pat personally.
I firmly believe an enclosure
is a far better solution.
As far as the other issue, Yoda was totally at the brink of death, had
stopped eating, was dragging himself by his front legs, and had gone
into the closet and wouldn't come out. He was crying and crying and
crying. I was ready to put him down. A dear friend on this very group
told me that he wasn't crying necessarily
out of pain, he was *communicating*. It was about 3 days later he
started improving. There's a definite fine line between an animal
who's starving himself
to death and suffering, and one who is "just about" to turn the
corner. It's a tough
wait. I'm so glad I did not go with my gut instinct. I've had him 8
more years!

Sherry
Granby - 23 May 2008 00:34 GMT
With all due respect Sherry, I have seen these used around where I live.
There are a lot of roaming doge and it is either something like this or
housecats all the time.  I even got up the nerve to touch one of these wires
and, am still here.  I looked at two of the kities that had been zapped by
the wire and, no burns or missing hair from burns.  The owner said it only
took once or twice.  I know of the images from the cartoons where the cats
hair stands straight up etc. etc. you do what you have to do to give your
cats what they need, even if that is out time.
On May 21, 1:33 pm, Daniel Mahoney <d...@catfolks.net> wrote:
> > Thanks, Christina. The good news is, I did in fact get him to eat just a
> > short while after making the OP. Probably posted the updated update
[quoted text clipped - 55 lines]
>
> Dan

With all due respect, Dan, I think an electric fence to contain a cat
is a
horrible idea. I keep getting this mental image of an electric wire on
top of some kind of hog-wire type fence. The cat gets zapped, then
panics, and manages to get himself hung up in the fence. Or second
worse case scenario,
the cats just gets out anyway. I don't think it's a good idea, I never
thought it was a good idea. It has nothing to do with Pat personally.
I firmly believe an enclosure
is a far better solution.
As far as the other issue, Yoda was totally at the brink of death, had
stopped eating, was dragging himself by his front legs, and had gone
into the closet and wouldn't come out. He was crying and crying and
crying. I was ready to put him down. A dear friend on this very group
told me that he wasn't crying necessarily
out of pain, he was *communicating*. It was about 3 days later he
started improving. There's a definite fine line between an animal
who's starving himself
to death and suffering, and one who is "just about" to turn the
corner. It's a tough
wait. I'm so glad I did not go with my gut instinct. I've had him 8
more years!

Sherry
Sherry - 23 May 2008 04:36 GMT
> With all due respect Sherry, I have seen these used around where I live.
> There are a lot of roaming doge and it is either something like this or
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> hair stands straight up etc. etc. you do what you have to do to give your
> cats what they need, even if that is out time."Sherry" <sridd...@aol.com> wrote in message

Ok, then, educate me. I fully admit I've never seen a working electric
fence
for cats. I have zero frame of refeence.
Are you talking about one of those invisible fences that's regulated
by a collar
the cat wears?  Are you talking about a single-wire contraption that's
designed for livestock, run by an electric charger?
It just seems to me that the hunting instinct is so strong in a cat,
if he/she sees
a rabbit, bird, squirrel--he's going to plow through that "invisible
fence", electric shock be damned.  And he's *sure* not going to go
back through the fence to come back home.  It just seems to me that
the cat's going to end up lost, or neurotic, or both.
With the single-wire theory, you've obviously got to have some other
kind of fencing, or the cat's going to leap right over it. I assume
the single-wire method would work with some other kind of fence, along
the top of it, and it zaps the cat
when he tries to climb over. This is the one I think is the most
dangerous, becuase with the mental picture I have, the cat is going to
panic, and risk ending up tangled in the fencing, injured and
neurotic. I've seen a cat with his paw hung up dangling from a
chainlink fence.
It wasn't pretty.
Now humor me, please, and enlighten me further....is there some reason
an enclosure wouldn't provide a safer access to the outdoors?
I'm truly not trying to be wet blanket on this deal. I just *firmly*
believe, in my heart of hearts, that cats and eletric fences are not a
good mix.

Sherry
Granby - 23 May 2008 04:48 GMT
The ones I see are about four inches down from the top of the fence.  They
are not near as heavy a wire as the ones for cattle and don't have anywhere
near the charging power.

Something coming to the top of the fence and jumping over may miss it
altogether.  As Dan said they only have to encounter it a couple of times to
not do it again.  I only know Dan through Lee and her DH but I assure you,
he would not do anything to hurt his babies.

Hey, did you phone the thing in school where you all joined hands and the
teacher hooked up a telephone battery, for science class I think.  Well,
this was not as strong as that.
On May 22, 6:34 pm, "Granby" <s...@joink.com> wrote:
> With all due respect Sherry, I have seen these used around where I live.
> There are a lot of roaming doge and it is either something like this or
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> cats what they need, even if that is out time."Sherry" <sridd...@aol.com>
> wrote in message

Ok, then, educate me. I fully admit I've never seen a working electric
fence
for cats. I have zero frame of refeence.
Are you talking about one of those invisible fences that's regulated
by a collar
the cat wears?  Are you talking about a single-wire contraption that's
designed for livestock, run by an electric charger?
It just seems to me that the hunting instinct is so strong in a cat,
if he/she sees
a rabbit, bird, squirrel--he's going to plow through that "invisible
fence", electric shock be damned.  And he's *sure* not going to go
back through the fence to come back home.  It just seems to me that
the cat's going to end up lost, or neurotic, or both.
With the single-wire theory, you've obviously got to have some other
kind of fencing, or the cat's going to leap right over it. I assume
the single-wire method would work with some other kind of fence, along
the top of it, and it zaps the cat
when he tries to climb over. This is the one I think is the most
dangerous, becuase with the mental picture I have, the cat is going to
panic, and risk ending up tangled in the fencing, injured and
neurotic. I've seen a cat with his paw hung up dangling from a
chainlink fence.
It wasn't pretty.
Now humor me, please, and enlighten me further....is there some reason
an enclosure wouldn't provide a safer access to the outdoors?
I'm truly not trying to be wet blanket on this deal. I just *firmly*
believe, in my heart of hearts, that cats and eletric fences are not a
good mix.

Sherry
Granby - 23 May 2008 04:54 GMT
Sorry, I meant the phone battery experiment thing.  It is late.
> The ones I see are about four inches down from the top of the fence.  They
> are not near as heavy a wire as the ones for cattle and don't have
[quoted text clipped - 50 lines]
>
> Sherry
Sherry - 23 May 2008 14:39 GMT
LOL! I guess that's one childhood experience I missed. I do remember
the boys
talking about doing something with a phone battery that had to do with
fishing. (Can't remember much about it except that my father was
highly enraged about it)

My sister and I chased each other with a cattle prod. I guess that's
the closest thing I can think of. I'm sure that's a far worse zap than
an electric fence though.

Sherry
Pat - 23 May 2008 15:24 GMT
My sister and I chased each other with a cattle prod. I guess that's
the closest thing I can think of. I'm sure that's a far worse zap than
an electric fence though.

Cattle prods I think give 20,000 volts. Police taser guns give 50,000 but
are being raised to 75,000. I guess they're not lethal enough as it is....

Taser wants judge to clear it of homicide
Stun-gun maker says its weapons don't kill people
Tuesday, April 22, 2008

The company that makes Tasers often gets dragged into court. Families have
filed dozens of lawsuits claiming the stun-gun-type weapons kill. But it's
Taser International that filed the lawsuit being heard this week in Summit
County court. It wants a judge to override the county medical examiner by
changing her rulings in three deaths from homicide to accidental. It also
wants the judge to cross Taser off the record as a cause of death.

WKSU's M.L. Schultze reports: http://www.wksu.org/news/story/21992
Sherry - 23 May 2008 17:37 GMT
> My sister and I chased each other with a cattle prod. I guess that's
> the closest thing I can think of. I'm sure that's a far worse zap than
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> WKSU's M.L. Schultze reports:http://www.wksu.org/news/story/21992

Oh, I don't have any problem believing tasers can be lethal. I watched
a video of some cops *repeatedly* tasering someone. It was hideous.
IIRC it was the Barney Fife small-town type of cop, who IMO also be
required to carry one bullet in his pocket. I've lived in a small town
enough to know what kind of people that job attracts. And it's not
people who are policemen for the right reasons. Those people, the
truly good people, are in larger towns with better pay. How did I get
off on this?
Sorry --

Sherry
Granby - 23 May 2008 18:53 GMT
Yeah it sure is.
On May 22, 10:54 pm, "Granby" <s...@joink.com> wrote:
> Sorry, I meant the phone battery experiment thing. It is late."Granby"
> <s...@joink.com> wrote in message
>
> news:69mt5bF33ekivU1@mid.individual.net...

LOL! I guess that's one childhood experience I missed. I do remember
the boys
talking about doing something with a phone battery that had to do with
fishing. (Can't remember much about it except that my father was
highly enraged about it)

My sister and I chased each other with a cattle prod. I guess that's
the closest thing I can think of. I'm sure that's a far worse zap than
an electric fence though.

Sherry
Daniel Mahoney - 23 May 2008 14:34 GMT
> It wasn't pretty.
> Now humor me, please, and enlighten me further....is there some reason
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Sherry

Allow me to clear this up a little.

Electric fences have been around for a long time. There original use was
to keep cattle and horses from destroying the fences that were intended to
contain them. Many of the the cattle fence chargers in use today put out
some extremely hefty voltage at enough current to cause burns. I brushed
up against one once. It was a pulsed fence, where the juice is on for
about a second, off for around four seconds, etc. During the second that
the juice was on I was unable to move off the wire. I have no doubt that a
fence like that could do serious injury to a dog or cat, and I wouldn't
want to have such a fence anywhere near where my kitties could get to.

The small animal fencer uses the same concept but on a smaller scale. Most
of them are still pulsed, but they put out quite a bit less voltage at a
lot less current - not enough to do harm. I've grabbed my own fence wire
intentionally several times, and I do not have a problem with having a
wire charged to that potential where my cats can get to it (at least, not
where they can get to it if they're being bad).

The feeling you get when you touch the wire is similar to stepping on
something sharp. When a cat touches the charged wire, it will feel like
the wire bit them. When you touch something and it bites you, you learn
not to touch it any more. If something really unusual was to happen and a
cat got stuck with a paw in contact with the wire it would be
uncomfortable, but would not do any harm. My background is electrical
engineering, and I'm familiar with the established standards for what
levels of electrical current are considered to be dangerous. I don't have
any worries about a small-animal fencer of the type I've used being
harmful to my babies.

In fact, here's an anecdote that you might find interesting. Since I am an
electrical engineer by training, I know what kind of damage electrical
things can do. Nancy goes crazy some times because of my weird hangups
with electricity. If we buy a new electric appliance, I won't allow it be
left plugged in until we have spent an entire weekend at home with the new
thing plugged in - I want it to do a 48-hour burnin with humans nearby
with fire extinguishers in case the device was poorly manufactured. I
can't go to sleep with an electric blanket plugged in anywhere in the
house - I'm too worried about the fire hazard and freaked out by the
potential electromagnetic effects. When a wonderfully kind soul donated a
surplus heated kitty bed to Miss Cleopatra, I wouldn't agree to leave it
plugged in overnight until it had spent two weekends running ok under
supervised conditions. I have too much experience studying how electrical
things work and how they are built to trust them on a wholesale basis. But
in spite of that wariness, small animal fencers have proven themselves to
be safe to my satisfaction. I know beyond a reasonable doubt that they are
safe in the sense that they won't catch fire and burn the house down, and
safe in the sense that they won't electrocute one of my precious kitties.

By installing the charged wire a few inches down from the top of the
fence, the cats can be catly and climb the fence if they really get the
urge, they'll just stop before they reach the top. If a really acrobatic
cat just jumps to the top of fence without touching the wire, he can
easily hop down from the top without touching it either. If you have a cat
strong enough to jump to the top of your fence, you've got no choice but
to use an enclosure.

I don't like the "invisible fence" collar-based systems, for much the same
reason you outlined. If a cat sees a bird or a squirrel and gets up a head
of steam, they could charge right through the protected boundary area in
such a hurry that they might not even notice the collar shock. But when
they started to come back home they would be moving slower, and could well
be dissuaded from returning to their own yard because of that same shock
collar.

As for the fence vs enclosure question - yes, an enclosure would be an
excellent idea and would be far superior to being indoors all day (if,
that is, you have a cat who is interested in the outdoors). However, I
know that in my back yard in Iowa we have trees, bushes, flowers, and
other interesting things that the cats love to explore. There's no way I
could put up an enclosure that would encompass all of those cool things.
I'd have to pick which of the fun spots the cats could get access to, and
my choices would almost certainly not be the same as what the kitties
found most interesting.

In my current yard, the entire electric fence question is moot - electric
fences don't work well on wooden fences. We are relying on mechanical
methods to keep the cats in the yard. But if I had a chain link or other
metal fence, I wouldn't hesitate to use a small-animal fencer to give them
safe access to the outside.

Dan
Stormmee - 24 May 2008 11:06 GMT
a very good explanation, and having grown up on a farm the cattle fencers
are completely different from a small yard fence, Lee
> > It wasn't pretty.
> > Now humor me, please, and enlighten me further....is there some reason
[quoted text clipped - 87 lines]
>
> Dan
Sherry - 24 May 2008 17:19 GMT
> a very good explanation, and having grown up on a farm the cattle fencers
> are completely different from a small yard fence, LeeDaniel Mahoney <d...@catfolks.net> wrote in message

An electric fence charger designed for livestock is the same thing,
whether it's in a small yard or not.

Sherry
Granby - 24 May 2008 17:32 GMT
Not.  This thred is dead, you can not change a persons mind when it has been
made up before the conversation starts.
On May 24, 5:06 am, "Stormmee" <rgr...@consolidated.net> wrote:
> a very good explanation, and having grown up on a farm the cattle fencers
> are completely different from a small yard fence, LeeDaniel Mahoney
> <d...@catfolks.net> wrote in message

An electric fence charger designed for livestock is the same thing,
whether it's in a small yard or not.

Sherry
Pat - 24 May 2008 18:02 GMT
| Not.  This thred is dead, you can not change a persons mind when it has been
| made up before the conversation starts.

| "Sherry" <sriddles@aol.com> wrote
| An electric fence charger designed for livestock is the same thing,
| whether it's in a small yard or not.

Perhaps Sherry simply missed the most salient points of Dan's explanation.
In case she did, allow me to reiterate:

"The small animal fencer ... puts out quite a bit less voltage at a lot less
current - not enough to do harm"

"If ... a cat got stuck with a paw in contact with the wire it would be
uncomfortable, but would not do any harm"

"My background is electrical engineering, and ... I don't have any worries
about a small-animal fencer of the type I've used ... small animal fencers
have proven themselves to be safe to my satisfaction. I know beyond a
reasonable doubt that they are safe in the sense that they won't electrocute
one of my precious kitties.... if I had a chain link or other metal fence, I
wouldn't hesitate to use a small-animal fencer "
Sherry - 24 May 2008 18:56 GMT
> | Not.  This thred is dead, you can not change a persons mind when it has
> been
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> one of my precious kitties.... if I had a chain link or other metal fence, I
> wouldn't hesitate to use a small-animal fencer "

Frankly, even though, if I understood correctly, you do have a feed-
store type
charger and you had planned to string electrical cord into the house,
and run the hot wire on top of a welded-wire fence, I'm not that
worried about *permanent*,
physical damage from electricity itself.
I simply don't believe in negative reinforcement "training" for cats.
Try zapping a cat with a fence charger for misbehavior in the house.
It's not going to help the behavior. The cat is going to keep on doing
it, and probably become neurotic
and start peeing in floor on top of that.
I don't get how everyone seems to think a cat is going to touch one
paw on an electric wire, and suddenly remove it go "Duh! I don't think
I'll do that again." Watch a cat climb a fence sometime, and see what
happens at the top. They're going to scramble, and panic, and probably
end up on the other side of the fence.
But that's my opinion, and you can do what you want to. If I didn't
care about what happens to your cats, I wouldn't have an opinion one
way or another. I completely understand
your desire to let them have time outdoors. I would, too.

Sherry
Pat - 24 May 2008 20:03 GMT
I don't get how everyone seems to think a cat is going to touch one
paw on an electric wire, and suddenly remove it go "Duh! I don't think
I'll do that again." Watch a cat climb a fence sometime, and see what
happens at the top. They're going to scramble, and panic, and probably
end up on the other side of the fence.

I understand your sentiments. I would ask how many cats you have witnessed
doing this. Dan has described his own experience, and I have seen firsthand
how a breeder of small dogs used electrified wire to stop the dogs trying to
get out of a yard surrounded by a very low fence. The dogs simply will not
go nearer than several inches from the fence. They don't understand
electricity, all they know is the fence "bites" if touched. I've seen horses
react the same way. Even young foals learn very quickly to avoid the
electrictrified fence, and horses are as "reactionary" as cats if not more
so.

You need to picture the cat climbing up a wire fence in slow motion to
understand how the mechanism works. The cat is putting one paw ahead of
(higher than) the other as it climbs, meanwhile it is focused on the goal
(the top of the fence). We all know that cats do not notice objects that are
right under their noses, rather their focus is farther off. Therefore when
the cat has reached the electrified wire about six inches from the top of
the fence and the next step is to cross that point, and it reaches upward to
grab a higher spot on the fence, its paw/leg must of necessity touch the
electrified wire, which then "bites" the cat's paw/leg, and the paw/leg is
immediately jerked backward - i.e., back down to the previous stage of the
climb.

At this point it would be helpful to have had the experience of touching an
electrified wire and the knowledge that the instinctive response to doing so
is to instantaneously withdraw one's hand - or in the case of an animal,
whatever body part has either inadvertently or in ignorance touched an
electrified wire - and most definitely *not* go forward or further *into*
the object that delivered the "bite".

Should the cat make a second attempt to continue to the top of the fence, it
will again be "bitten" by the wire, with the cat's face close enough to the
very thin wire that it does not actually see the wire and thus cannot make
the connection between the wire and being "bitten" and thus cannot learn to
climb over the fence without touching the wire at all. Even if the cat could
make that mental connection, it would still be incapable of climbing the
fence without touching the wire. Therefore the cat eventually will "give up"
on the prospect of getting over the fence, just as the horse or cow or goat
or dog or whatever learns to avoid contact with the fence.
Sherry - 24 May 2008 18:57 GMT
> Not.  This thred is dead, you can not change a persons mind when it has been
> made up before the conversation starts."Sherry" <sridd...@aol.com> wrote in message

Great! Then for crying out loud, killfile me, or something, please.
Just stop post-humping.

Sherry
Granby - 24 May 2008 19:45 GMT
I am sorry I wrote what I did the way I did.  I have no intention of KF your
posts.  Most of the time, I really enjoy them.  I just know I won;t change
you mind, which is fine, and I won't change mine.  What the heck is post
humping, or can I ask.
On May 24, 11:32 am, "Granby" <s...@joink.com> wrote:
> Not. This thred is dead, you can not change a persons mind when it has
> been
> made up before the conversation starts."Sherry" <sridd...@aol.com> wrote
> in message

Great! Then for crying out loud, killfile me, or something, please.
Just stop post-humping.

Sherry
Stormmee - 25 May 2008 13:48 GMT
you are absolutely correct, so that is why one must get the right equipment,
if you use a livestock charger you will have fried cat, Lee
On May 24, 5:06 am, "Stormmee" <rgr...@consolidated.net> wrote:
> a very good explanation, and having grown up on a farm the cattle fencers
> are completely different from a small yard fence, LeeDaniel Mahoney <d...@catfolks.net> wrote in message

An electric fence charger designed for livestock is the same thing,
whether it's in a small yard or not.

Sherry
EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) - 21 May 2008 19:54 GMT
> It's still touch-and-go with the Aby cat.
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> I guess it's up to him, now, to either get well or die, because he won't let
> me do much of anything aimed at keeping him alive.

I haven't been following this topic, but I assume you've taken him to
the vet.  What was the diagnosis/prognosis?
Pat - 21 May 2008 20:02 GMT
| I haven't been following this topic, but I assume you've taken him to
| the vet.  What was the diagnosis/prognosis?

Originally, we suspected poison (that was a short-lived idea) but apparently
it's just a serious ear infection, for which he is supposed to be taking
cephalexin. I say "supposed to be" since he's a very hard cat to pill. I
managed reasonably well for the first 12 days but now he's getting more
stubborn about being pilled, to the point where I doubt my ability to
continue giving the meds. But I will keep trying. This morning I had to
dissolve the contents of a capsule in some milk and give it via syringe, and
he spit at least half of it out.
Daniel Mahoney - 21 May 2008 20:25 GMT
> Originally, we suspected poison (that was a short-lived idea) but apparently
> it's just a serious ear infection, for which he is supposed to be taking
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> dissolve the contents of a capsule in some milk and give it via syringe, and
> he spit at least half of it out.

Pat, could you call the vet again? As I've mentioned before, I know that
some veterinary meds can be compounded in transdermal form so they just
have to be rubbed into the inside of the ear. Alternatively, many drugs
can be compounded into flavors more palatable to cats.

The pharmacy nearest my work offers these compounding services. Please
take a look at
http://www.medicap.com/FranchiseeLocations/8023/SpecialtyCareCenter.aspx?scccode=2
(my pharmacy is in zip code 50208).

If the vet could tell you whether cephalexin is one of the drugs available
for transdermal compounding, or if it can be compounded into something
that would taste better to Abelard and the vet might be willing to call
the prescription into my pharmacy, I'd be glad to pay for getting a
batch compounded and overnighted to you.

Dan
Pat - 21 May 2008 20:36 GMT
| Pat, could you call the vet again?

This is her day off. Can the pharmacy tell you if this drug is one that can
be flavored or made for the ears?

| If the vet could tell you whether cephalexin is one of the drugs available
| for transdermal compounding, or if it can be compounded into something
| that would taste better to Abelard and the vet might be willing to call
| the prescription into my pharmacy, I'd be glad to pay for getting a
| batch compounded and overnighted to you.

If you can find out before 5 and let me know, I may be able to get another
vet to make the call today. Otherwise it will have to wait until tomorrow
(if it can be done).

Thanks for the offer.
Daniel Mahoney - 21 May 2008 20:49 GMT
> This is her day off. Can the pharmacy tell you if this drug is one that can
> be flavored or made for the ears?

I'll call and ask. If so, I'll give you a call.

Dan
Daniel Mahoney - 21 May 2008 21:10 GMT
Pat, check your email.

Dan
bastXXXette@sonic.net - 21 May 2008 20:02 GMT
> It's still touch-and-go with the Aby cat.

> He's getting around much better, but he seems to have a "head cold" and it's
> become all but impossible to get anything into his stomach. I've never seen
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> vicinity, and foams profusely at the mouth when nothing at all has been
> given. My hands are a total mess.

[snip]

It sounds to me like he might need to be in the vet hospital right now.
Seems like it's more than you, an individual and not a professional, can
manage.

I know money is a major issue. We really need to have an RPCA vet fund
again. Any suggestions on how we could do that? I would be willing to set
up an account to hold funds. We did this once before, and unfortunately
it ended up disasterously, but in this case, nobody else has access to
my bank account.

Also, I have a Paypal account, which I have used to pay others with.
It's not set up to *receive* money, but I could find out how to do that.
I imagine that's not hard.

Would folks be interested in creating such a fund again? I have tried
to contact Victor, but he's not responding. Maybe he's out of town.

We shouldn't allow a wonderful cat like Abelard to die because his human
can't afford the level of care he apparently needs. There are others in
the same position. I'd like to help, and so would several others, but at
the moment there doesn't seem to be any organization. Could those of you
who are interested in this please respond, either here or by private
email? (Remove the XXX's if you email me.)

Thanks,
Joyce

To email me, remove the triple-X from my user name.  ^..^
Daniel Mahoney - 21 May 2008 20:32 GMT
> Would folks be interested in creating such a fund again? I have tried
> to contact Victor, but he's not responding. Maybe he's out of town.

I'm in. I'd offer the use of my PayPal account, but my bank can be very
flaky about transferring funds out of PayPal and I hesitate to trust them
for something as important as this.

I'd be glad to set aside a percentage of every paycheck to go to the vet
fund. Just tell me where to send it.

Dan
Kyla =^. .^= - 21 May 2008 20:58 GMT
"Daniel Mahoney"
>> Would folks be interested in creating such a fund again? I have tried
>> to contact Victor, but he's not responding. Maybe he's out of town.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Dan

I wish I could help out with money, but being so broke myself, I can't
help:(
And I feel so bad about that.
Hug and sadness
Kyla
Stormmee - 22 May 2008 01:42 GMT
no need to feel bad, you do your best and you send purrs and prayers and
those are just as important, Lee

> "Daniel Mahoney"
> >> Would folks be interested in creating such a fund again? I have tried
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Hug and sadness
> Kyla
Kyla =^. .^= - 22 May 2008 03:33 GMT
Thank you sweetie, I really appreciate your saying that...
Hug
Kyla
"Stormmee"
> no need to feel bad, you do your best and you send purrs and prayers and
> those are just as important, Lee
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>> Hug and sadness
>> Kyla
Yowie - 21 May 2008 22:02 GMT
> > It's still touch-and-go with the Aby cat.
>
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
> who are interested in this please respond, either here or by private
> email? (Remove the XXX's if you email me.)

I can't fault your good intentions, Joyce, and nor do I in any way distrust
you, but "once bitten, twice shy" regarding an actual *fund*. The only way
I'd suppport pooling our money into one account was if it was set up
formally with rules and laws and share holders and all that other legal
stuff to ensure that it was always going to be managed properly and that in
the case of something happening to you (or whoever was in charge of it), the
money wouldn't be considered be part of your estate by law.

I am also concerned these days that it could be scammed. We did have a case
here not so long ago when a person posting to RPCA who was allegedly dying
of brain cancer (and having many other unfortunate events in her life)
turned out to be a total fraud who was milking RPCA's kind and supportive
nature for all the attention she could get. Whether it was malicious or a
case of Manchausen's syndrom is irrelevant, if that particualr individual
had known about an RPCA fund, I am quite sure she would have made several
posts about the financial dire straights she was in and how she couldn't
afford life saving treatment. And I know, you being such a kind and
compassionate person would have felt that using part or all of the RPCA fund
to help her would have been a Good Thing (and most people in RPCA would have
agreed). But that would have left nothing for a kitty in need if there had
been one...

Another concern I have is the allocation of funds if we had a pool of cash.
Who makes the decision to donate how much? Is there a flat rate per kitty?
Or does however much is needed get given to the first cat in need? What if
it as radical but risky surgery? Would we donate $20,000 to do risky surgery
and leave nothing for the next cat who really only needs $100 of vetinary
care that is guranteed to work?

Personally, if a fund were to be set up that pooled RPCA money, and it had
all the legal protection of a trust fund or whatever the legal term is, I
think I'd prefer it to be able to offer very low interest, long term *loans*
for vetinary services rather than just *giving* money. That would at least
prevent scams and people disputing about who got how much money. It would
also help prevent people thinking that expensive surgery is 'covered' by the
good will of RPCA - it wouldn't be. Each slave woudl still have to pay for
said surgery, but wouldn't be hit for a huge bill up front.

Effectively my ideal RPCA fund would more of a loan account or even an
insurance fund than just a pool of money we give to people when the ask.

Given the above complications, the standard method of financial support
since the original fund's demise has been for each individual to give money
to the vet in question. Even I've rung up vets inthe USA and after making
sure they udnerstood my accent (sometimes its difficult) and that they could
take an Australian credit card, I've been able to make a small donation to
several different vetinary accounts. This system allows people to donate as
much or as little to each situation as they see fit and their finances
allow, knowing that their money can't possibly be going to anything else
besides vetinary services, and that the 'emergency' was real.

Even if you do set up a fund, Joyce, it going to take a bit of time, time
that Abelard probably cant afford. In the meanwhile, does anyone know the
contact details of Abelard's vet?

Yowie
Pat - 21 May 2008 22:42 GMT
| contact details of Abelard's vet?

I will supply that info if/when it is needed.

About the fund, I've been thinking along the same lines you outlined, a
website modeled after Dr. Keith Taylor's ModestNeeds.org. One of these days
when I have enough time I will make it a reality. Meanwhile I seek
suggestions for a domain name.
Magic Mood Jeep © - 22 May 2008 00:09 GMT
> | contact details of Abelard's vet?
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> when I have enough time I will make it a reality. Meanwhile I seek
> suggestions for a domain name.

Somehow or another, I found this - I think through either the HSUS or
ASPCA web site, or there was a story on an online news.... or maybe it
was here?  It's the Feline Veterinary Emergency Assistance Program.

http://www.fveap.org/sys-tmpl/door/

>^..^< This is Kitty. Copy and paste Kitty into your signature to help
her wipe out Bunny's world domination.
--
The ONE and ONLY
lefthanded-pathetic-paranoid-psychotic-sarcastic-wiseass-ditzy
former-blonde in Bloomington! (And proud of it, too)©
email me at nalee1964 (at) comcast (dot) net
http://community.webshots.com/user/mgcmdjeep
Pat - 22 May 2008 01:24 GMT
| Somehow or another, I found this - I think through either the HSUS or
| ASPCA web site, or there was a story on an online news.... or maybe it
| was here?  It's the Feline Veterinary Emergency Assistance Program.
|
| http://www.fveap.org/sys-tmpl/door/

Yes, I found several more like it when I was researching how to set up a
program. Every single one I found talked about how difficult it is to
actually get funded through them.
bastXXXette@sonic.net - 21 May 2008 23:02 GMT
> I can't fault your good intentions, Joyce, and nor do I in any way distrust
> you, but "once bitten, twice shy" regarding an actual *fund*. The only way
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> the case of something happening to you (or whoever was in charge of it), the
> money wouldn't be considered be part of your estate by law.

I agree with there being rules, and I also understand that we would need to
decide when, how much, and to whom funds would be donated. Loans would be
good, too, for those who knew they could pay it back. I would prefer to
use an honor system for that, though.

Anyway, all that would be a reasonable discussion to have. As for a trust
fund, with all the legal bells and whistles, while I don't oppose the idea,
I'm not volunteering to engineer it. :) If someone else wanted to do that,
I would support it, but if I were setting something up, I would go with
simplicity.

> Given the above complications, the standard method of financial support
> since the original fund's demise has been for each individual to give money
> to the vet in question. Even I've rung up vets inthe USA and after making
> sure they udnerstood my accent (sometimes its difficult) and that they could
> take an Australian credit card, I've been able to make a small donation to
> several different vetinary accounts.

One problem I have with this is that I would be calling a phone number
which (in some cases) I have no proof is an actual vet's office, and giving
them my credit card number. Someone could easily pretend to have a sick
cat, post their own phone number or that of an accomplice, and then answer
the phone as "XYZ Vet Hospital". How would any of us know this wasn't the
case? Especially if it's in a different country.

This is why I like the paypal idea best, ie, what Victor has done. People
could donate to the paypal account, and the owner of that account could
then send a check (or a series of checks) to that vet's office. If Victor
isn't available, someone else (such as myself) could be a backup person.
This could work whether or not there is a fund.

Signature

Joyce

To email me, remove the triple-X from my user name.  ^..^

Pat - 21 May 2008 23:19 GMT
| calling a phone number which (in some cases) I have no proof is
| an actual vet's office, and giving them my credit card number.
| Someone could easily pretend to have a sick cat, post their own
| phone number or that of an accomplice, and then answer as
| "XYZ Vet Hospital". How would any of us know this wasn't the
| case? Especially if it's in a different country.

For the USA, Canada and England, and perhaps (probably) other countries,
there are online yellow page directories, and most vets will be listed in
them. Some will have their own websites, or at least a listing with their
city's chamber of commerce or business directory, and the phone numbers will
match up.
Yowie - 21 May 2008 23:38 GMT
>> I can't fault your good intentions, Joyce, and nor do I in any way
>> distrust you, but "once bitten, twice shy" regarding an actual
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Loans would be good, too, for those who knew they could pay it back.
> I would prefer to use an honor system for that, though.

I could go with an honour system - I don't think any of us could afford the
legal fees to chase up "bad debt". Can you imagine RPCA being the cause of
The Repo Man? LOL

> Anyway, all that would be a reasonable discussion to have. As for a
> trust fund, with all the legal bells and whistles, while I don't
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> would any of us know this wasn't the case? Especially if it's in a
> different country.

I have good Google-fu. I have checked each address and phone number with the
ones listed in the phone directory that is publically available on the
internet. So far, the details have matched :-)

> This is why I like the paypal idea best, ie, what Victor has done.
> People could donate to the paypal account, and the owner of that
> account could then send a check (or a series of checks) to that vet's
> office. If Victor isn't available, someone else (such as myself)
> could be a backup person. This could work whether or not there is a
> fund.

Fair enough. The system we currently have is working pretty well, then :-)

Yowie
Christina Websell - 22 May 2008 00:51 GMT
"Yowie" <yowie9644.DIESPAMDIE@yahoo.com.au> wrote in >>
>> [snip]
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> posts about the financial dire straights she was in and how she couldn't
> afford life saving treatment.

Yes, I remember that well.    It came to light that she was a fraud - and
was very believable for a while - only a few weeks before I got my diagnosis
of ovarian cancer in 2005.
So when I told you all, I wondered "will they believe me?"

I've sent money on two occasions for vet's bills.  Once to someone who never
posted again after the bill was paid, and once to a regular here who never
acknowledged it.

I don't know what the answer is.  It would be nice to have a vet fund for
regular posters who fall on hard times, but how it would be administrated I
don't know.  I wouldn't want that job of deciding if megabucks were in order
from the fund or just a little to help.

OTOH, I cannot think of much worse than knowing your cat could be saved if
only you had more money.  And you haven't so they have to go to RB.

Tweed
Stormmee - 22 May 2008 01:50 GMT
I guess I wasn't reading when that fraud happened, and I think I am glad I
missed that, I like the system victor has used... and I think all we need is
a back up person with the same system, Lee

> "Yowie" <yowie9644.DIESPAMDIE@yahoo.com.au> wrote in >>
> >> [snip]
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
> Tweed
Yowie - 22 May 2008 05:13 GMT
> "Yowie" <yowie9644.DIESPAMDIE@yahoo.com.au> wrote in >>
>>> [snip]
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> who never posted again after the bill was paid, and once to a regular
> here who never acknowledged it.

I don't know the person who took the money and ran, so to speak, but when
donating for the 'regular' was there truly nothing said in group about it? I
can't imagine a regular being that rude as to not at least give a blanket
thanks - depending on how it was done, they may not know (and have no way of
finding out) exactly who donated what.

Yowie
bastXXXette@sonic.net - 22 May 2008 07:17 GMT
>> I've sent money on two occasions for vet's bills.  Once to someone
>> who never posted again after the bill was paid, and once to a regular
>> here who never acknowledged it.

> I don't know the person who took the money and ran, so to speak, but when
> donating for the 'regular' was there truly nothing said in group about it? I
> can't imagine a regular being that rude as to not at least give a blanket
> thanks - depending on how it was done, they may not know (and have no way of
> finding out) exactly who donated what.

Well, I certainly hope it wasn't me! I received donations for a large
vet bill in 2005. I remember sending blanket thanks to the newsgroup, as
well as sending private email to individuals I was aware of - some folks
donated anonymously.

Tweed, I've tried to send you email on a few occasions, but it always
bounced back as undeliverable. This is after I remove the "spamfree"
from your address and change the appropriate "." to a "@". I don't
remember what happened almost 3 years ago, but that might have been it.
(Assuming I'm the "regular" you're talking about.)

Signature

Joyce

To email me, remove the triple-X from my user name.  ^..^

Christina Websell - 22 May 2008 17:39 GMT
> >> I've sent money on two occasions for vet's bills.  Once to someone
> >> who never posted again after the bill was paid, and once to a regular
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> remember what happened almost 3 years ago, but that might have been it.
> (Assuming I'm the "regular" you're talking about.)

No, it wasn't you, Joyce.
bastXXXette@sonic.net - 22 May 2008 20:42 GMT
> <bastXXXette@sonic.net> wrote in message

>> Christina Websell wrote:

>>> I've sent money on two occasions for vet's bills.  Once to someone
>>> who never posted again after the bill was paid, and once to a regular
>>> here who never acknowledged it.

>> Well, I certainly hope it wasn't me!

> No, it wasn't you, Joyce.

Whew!!

It's still unfortunate that someone else accepted your generosity
without bothering to thank you. I'm just glad I wasn't that rude!!!

Signature

Joyce

To email me, remove the triple-X from my user name.  ^..^

Charleen Welton - 22 May 2008 13:40 GMT
Tweed, I'm sorry that you had two bad experiences when you gave from your
heart and pocketbook. I want to explain how things worked with the donations
that were sent in for Four and an idea that came out of your comment. All
the dontions that went to Victor's Pay Pal account were sent to St. Francis
Vet Hospital in two of Victor's personal checks.  So I would not have any
information from the vet of who sent what amount.  When the final amount was
sent in to Victor he email to me a sheet with the dates, amounts, countries
they came from and the total amount. The names were blured out. It didn't
matter to me who sent what amount. But I realize, based on your comment,
that I should have asked Victor for a list of the persons who donated
without the amounts and contacted each thanking them individually.

Tweed, I don't know if you were referring to this situation but your comment
brought about a good change, thank you.
Charleen

> "Yowie" <yowie9644.DIESPAMDIE@yahoo.com.au> wrote in >>
>>> [snip]
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
> Tweed
Charleen Welton - 21 May 2008 22:38 GMT
I'm in. The memory of Four and all the help he received will be gladly and
gratefully be paid back as finances allow.
Charleen

> > It's still touch-and-go with the Aby cat.
>
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>
> To email me, remove the triple-X from my user name.  ^..^
Stormmee - 22 May 2008 01:41 GMT
it seems that Victor was going out of town, Mexico maybe for a longish stay,
Lee

>  > It's still touch-and-go with the Aby cat.
>
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>
> To email me, remove the triple-X from my user name.  ^..^
Irulan - 22 May 2008 01:56 GMT
I would be willing to put in a few dollars now and then
for the vet fund. Let us know the how's, when's and
where's.

Lily & her mama

Signature

Irulan
from the stars we come
to the stars we return
from now until the end of time.

> > It's still touch-and-go with the Aby cat.
>
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>
> To email me, remove the triple-X from my user name.  ^..^
kilikini - 21 May 2008 23:52 GMT
> It's still touch-and-go with the Aby cat.
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> I guess it's up to him, now, to either get well or die, because he
> won't let me do much of anything aimed at keeping him alive.

DAMN, DAMN, DAMN!  I can't imagine what you're going through, Pat.  I don't
know what to say.  All I can give are purrs in your direction.

kili
Matthew - 22 May 2008 00:59 GMT
still purring and praying
> It's still touch-and-go with the Aby cat.
>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> let
> me do much of anything aimed at keeping him alive.
Pat - 22 May 2008 01:28 GMT
We went out again, this time for a longer walk, and a much larger meal.
Kitty is happy for the time being but it's nearly time for the pill ordeal
again. Hope it can be less stressful this time.
bastXXXette@sonic.net - 22 May 2008 01:49 GMT
> We went out again, this time for a longer walk, and a much larger meal.
> Kitty is happy for the time being but it's nearly time for the pill ordeal
> again. Hope it can be less stressful this time.

Maybe you can try to pill him outdoors? He might be more amenable to it
then. Smudge puts up with much more stuff from me when we're outside,
although I have to admit I've never tried to pill her outside. Might be
worth a try. Are you taking him on a leash?

Signature

Joyce

To email me, remove the triple-X from my user name.  ^..^

Pat - 22 May 2008 04:50 GMT
| Pat <just_a_ghost@in_this_house.com> wrote:
|
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
| although I have to admit I've never tried to pill her outside. Might be
| worth a try. Are you taking him on a leash?

He usually goes in harness with leash but not today, he's not able to run
yet and anyway he wanted to stick close to me. Earlier in the day, before he
accepted the salmon - I was fully expecting him to refuse it and only
brought the package out to suck some of the juice into a syringe to give
him - he refused to drink salmon juice from the syringe, and getting a pill
into him lately is about 600x harder than giving any liquids by mouth.

I think he objects to the use of force (and I don't blame him for that -
thinking back to when I was a child and how hard I fought anything done to
me by force, whether a doctor, nurse, parent, relative, teacher, you name
it, I refused it ON PRINCIPLE. Many's the time I kicked a doctor/nurse in
the shins when they tried to inject me with something, and when they wanted
my tonsils, I actually ran away from home!)
MatSav - 22 May 2008 07:38 GMT
> ... before he [Abelard]
> accepted the salmon - I was fully expecting him to refuse it
> and only
> brought the package out to suck some of the juice into a
> syringe to give
> him - he refused to drink salmon juice from the syringe,...

Can't say I'm surprised. Have you tasted said juice? It may have
been very salty!

Signature

MatSav

Pat - 22 May 2008 07:50 GMT
| > ... before he [Abelard]
| > accepted the salmon - I was fully expecting him to refuse it
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
| Can't say I'm surprised. Have you tasted said juice? It may have
| been very salty!

No, I've never tasted the juice of fresh raw salmon. I like the salty juice
that canned salmon is packed in, and so do all the cats (they beg for it
when I open a can, but they never get it all, haha!). Abelard drank the
stuff from the palm of my hand, but would not take it from the syringe.
Rhonda - 22 May 2008 06:46 GMT
Pat, if he will not take the pills but you are able to do sub-cu fluids,
how about getting the medicine in indictable form? I don't know what
he's taking, but I'm sure he would have a better chance if he gets his
medicine -- especially if it is antibiotics for an infection.

How about calling the vet asap and seeing if they will give you syringes
and indictable meds? Our vet has done that.

Rhonda

> It's still touch-and-go with the Aby cat.
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> I guess it's up to him, now, to either get well or die, because he won't let
> me do much of anything aimed at keeping him alive.
Pat - 22 May 2008 07:13 GMT
| Pat, if he will not take the pills but you are able to do sub-cu fluids,
| how about getting the medicine in indictable form? I don't know what
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
| How about calling the vet asap and seeing if they will give you syringes
| and indictable meds? Our vet has done that.

Now there's a good idea. If I was less stressed out I might have though of
it myself. I'll see what the vet says in the morning.
Rhonda - 22 May 2008 08:30 GMT
> | Pat, if he will not take the pills but you are able to do sub-cu fluids,
> | how about getting the medicine in indictable form? I don't know what
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Now there's a good idea. If I was less stressed out I might have though of
> it myself. I'll see what the vet says in the morning.

OMG, I spell-checked it and trusted the computer to change to the right
spelling without paying attention, ha! I'm glad you were able to know I
meant injectable.

Hope it helps, now I'd better sleep.

Rhonda
bastXXXette@sonic.net - 22 May 2008 09:49 GMT
> OMG, I spell-checked it and trusted the computer to change to the right
> spelling without paying attention, ha! I'm glad you were able to know I
> meant injectable.

I figured that's what it *meant*, but I thought this was a specific,
veterinary-jargon meaning for "indictable". :)  But you really don't
want to put something indictable into your kitty, do you? :)

Signature

Joyce

To email me, remove the triple-X from my user name.  ^..^

Rhonda - 23 May 2008 04:07 GMT
>  > OMG, I spell-checked it and trusted the computer to change to the right
>  > spelling without paying attention, ha! I'm glad you were able to know I
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> veterinary-jargon meaning for "indictable". :)  But you really don't
> want to put something indictable into your kitty, do you? :)

No, you're right. But maybe it's a good way to get rid of evidence?

Rhonda