Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / Cat Anecdotes / April 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

URGENT TO GINGER-LYN

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
CatNipped - 16 Apr 2008 14:35 GMT
Does anyone know Ginger-lyn's phone number or real email?  I wanted to get
this to her before they do surgery on Cosmo...

Ginger-lyn, Demi had the exact same thing - it's called a hematoma - when
Sammy swatted her upside the head.  My vet said they could aspirate it, but
it would come back and it would cause a cauliflower ear; or they could do
surgery and the surgery would probably cause a cauliflower ear; or we could
just leave it alone and eventually it would go away, but it would probably
cause a cauliflower ear.  Since all the outcomes were the same (except that
the first two could possibly introduce an infection which could be very
bad/fatal), and since Demi is terrified of the vet, we choose to just leave
it alone and it did eventually go down (didn't ever seem to cause her pain).
And, yes, she has a cauliflower ear (but she's still gorgeous).
http://www.possibleplaces.com/catnipped/Demi21/

I'm hoping you read this before you subject Cosmo (and your pocketbook) to
surgery.

Hugs,

CatNipped

Signature

Hugs,

CatNipped

See all my masters here: http://www.PossiblePlaces.com/CatNipped/

Daniel Mahoney - 16 Apr 2008 14:55 GMT
I just e-mailed you the e-mail addresses I've got for her.

Dan
GaDragonfly - 16 Apr 2008 15:25 GMT
> I just e-mailed you the e-mail addresses I've got for her.
>
> Dan

I just read your email and called Ginger-lyn right away but Cosmos is
already in surgery.  She expects to hear something between 11 - 12
edt. I asked her to let us know as soon as she could but she has some
things she had to do this afternoon and may not be able to update the
group until later.  She does have Merlin giving her meows and purrs -
I could hear her talking to Ginger-lyn the entire time we were
talking.  Additional purrs are always welcome, however.
Julie
CatNipped - 16 Apr 2008 15:54 GMT
>> I just e-mailed you the e-mail addresses I've got for her.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> talking.  Additional purrs are always welcome, however.
> Julie

ARGH!  Oh well, hopefully all will be well with Cosmo - but I'm really
bummed about not seeing this last night and responding.  I know Ginger-lyn
is in some financial straits right now (something I can, unfortunately,
relate to) and I'd liked to have told her in time that she could have
avoided this additional expense.

Hugs,

CatNipped
kilikini - 16 Apr 2008 15:58 GMT
> Does anyone know Ginger-lyn's phone number or real email?  I wanted
> to get this to her before they do surgery on Cosmo...
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> CatNipped

Now that you mention that, CatNipped, our friend's d*g had the same thing!
It eventually gets reabsorbed into the body and goes away.  Thank you for
realizing that's what her baby has!

kili
tripsovercats@msn.com - 16 Apr 2008 18:44 GMT
> Does anyone know Ginger-lyn's phone number or real email?  I wanted to get
> this to her before they do surgery on Cosmo...
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> I'm hoping you read this before you subject Cosmo (and your pocketbook) to
> surgery.

Just an FYI on  hematomas- more often than not they must be repaired
as they cause a lot of pain/discomfort and possibly infection. I have
a cat that had a hematoma and it was quite painful for him. He was
treated (the surgery is fairly minor and is actually kind of cool) and
it was much better to take care of it than force him to deal with the
pain for a prolonged period of time. Treating it quickly also resulted
in his healed ear looking fairly normal as well, although I wouldn't
have loved him any less if he had ended up with a cauliflower ear! You
can see how the surgery looks here (it's in a dog, but the way the ear
looks with stitches is the same for cats):
http://www.thepetcenter.com/sur/hema.html
I think Ginger-Lyn did the right thing to get her kitty's ear fixed.
CatNipped - 16 Apr 2008 19:18 GMT
On Apr 16, 8:35 am, "CatNipped" <CatNip...@PossiblePlaces.com> wrote:
> Does anyone know Ginger-lyn's phone number or real email? I wanted to get
> this to her before they do surgery on Cosmo...
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> I'm hoping you read this before you subject Cosmo (and your pocketbook) to
> surgery.

Just an FYI on  hematomas- more often than not they must be repaired
as they cause a lot of pain/discomfort and possibly infection. I have
a cat that had a hematoma and it was quite painful for him. He was
treated (the surgery is fairly minor and is actually kind of cool) and
it was much better to take care of it than force him to deal with the
pain for a prolonged period of time. Treating it quickly also resulted
in his healed ear looking fairly normal as well, although I wouldn't
have loved him any less if he had ended up with a cauliflower ear! You
can see how the surgery looks here (it's in a dog, but the way the ear
looks with stitches is the same for cats):
http://www.thepetcenter.com/sur/hema.html
I think Ginger-Lyn did the right thing to get her kitty's ear fixed.

=======================================================

Yes, there is some pain - just like when you bruise yourself or get a blood
blister.  However, the surgery or aspiration *can* introduce infection.  I
would have no idea how an infection could be introduced if there was not
break in the skin were you to let it heal on its own.  Moreover, the pain of
an incision and stitches would be, I would think, worse than the bruise-like
pain of the hematoma itself.

More to the point, Ginger-lyn is in such *dire* financial straits now that I
think the vet not giving her the same information my vet gave me is really
unethical.

Hugs,

CatNipped
tripsovercats@msn.com - 16 Apr 2008 19:36 GMT
> <tripsoverc...@msn.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
> an incision and stitches would be, I would think, worse than the bruise-like
> pain of the hematoma itself.

Hematoma's can elicit much more pain than that of a bruise and while
your cat may have been okay, many are not. My cat was a perfect
example and would cry even when his ear was lightly touched. It's not
right to minimize what can be a very painful condition.

> More to the point, Ginger-lyn is in such *dire* financial straits now that I
> think the vet not giving her the same information my vet gave me is really
> unethical.

I don't think you're being fair to the vet, or to Ginger-Lyn for that
matter. From what I've read, her vet is very aware of her situation
and I've never seen her complain about her vet or their
recommendations. Since you didn't see the hematoma or witness the
exam, it is unreasonable to make a judgement as to what treatment
Ginger-Lyn's cat actually needed. I have no doubt Ginger-Lyn would
have asked the vet if there was anything they could do that was non-
surgical and I think she is also smart enough to know when her cat
really needs a necessary treatment. I give her props for getting this
taken care of, even though it was difficult for her financially.
That's the sign of a responsible, caring cat slave.
CatNipped - 16 Apr 2008 19:48 GMT
On Apr 16, 1:18 pm, "CatNipped" <CatNip...@PossiblePlaces.com> wrote:
> <tripsoverc...@msn.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 52 lines]
> bruise-like
> pain of the hematoma itself.

Hematoma's can elicit much more pain than that of a bruise and while
your cat may have been okay, many are not. My cat was a perfect
example and would cry even when his ear was lightly touched. It's not
right to minimize what can be a very painful condition.

=======================================================

Of course it hurts to touch a bruise or blood blister (hematoma) why would
you think it would not??!  That is not to say that an *untouched* bruise or
hematoma is unbearably painful.  I agree there might be a situation where
surgery is mandated, but I also feel you should weigh all your options
before subjecting an animal (or a person) to the risks of anesthesia or the
possible risks to the surgery itself.

=======================================================

> More to the point, Ginger-lyn is in such *dire* financial straits now that
> I
> think the vet not giving her the same information my vet gave me is really
> unethical.

I don't think you're being fair to the vet, or to Ginger-Lyn for that
matter. From what I've read, her vet is very aware of her situation
and I've never seen her complain about her vet or their
recommendations. Since you didn't see the hematoma or witness the
exam, it is unreasonable to make a judgement as to what treatment
Ginger-Lyn's cat actually needed. I have no doubt Ginger-Lyn would
have asked the vet if there was anything they could do that was non-
surgical and I think she is also smart enough to know when her cat
really needs a necessary treatment. I give her props for getting this
taken care of, even though it was difficult for her financially.
That's the sign of a responsible, caring cat slave.

=======================================================

I would say that neither of us is there to judge the severity of the
situation, but it didn't appear to me that her vet had given her the same
information mine gave me.

I'm sorry you find fault in my attempt to get information to her that may
have given her some questions to ask her vet, but please don't imply that I
am *not* a responsible, caring cat slave because my vet gave me different
information to use in my decision making and I chose the more conservative
approach.  Choosing *NOT* to spend money one doesn't have when it is *NOT*
necessary is not being irresponsible or uncaring.

Hugs,

CatNipped
tripsovercats@msn.com - 16 Apr 2008 20:17 GMT
> Hematoma's can elicit much more pain than that of a bruise and while
> your cat may have been okay, many are not. My cat was a perfect
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> before subjecting an animal (or a person) to the risks of anesthesia or the
> possible risks to the surgery itself.

If you read Ginger-Lyn's original post, she said that the vet said
that if they drained it it would just fill up again and that surgery
was the only option. For that to be the case, it was probably very
similar to my cat's hematoma and I would venture a guess to say that
it was pretty large.

> > More to the point, Ginger-lyn is in such *dire* financial straits now that
> > I
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> situation, but it didn't appear to me that her vet had given her the same
> information mine gave me.

Again, they said they could drain it but it would just fill up again
and that surgery was the only option. It's clear they gave her the
alternative to surgery and also gave her the likely outcome to that
alternative.

> I'm sorry you find fault in my attempt to get information to her that may
> have given her some questions to ask her vet,

I did not find fault with what you did, and I never said I did. If you
look at my reply to you I simply pointed out that hematomas can be a
lot more serious than what you dealt with and that surgery is usually
warranted. Hematoma's aren't usually that easy to deal with. That was
all.

>but please don't imply that I
> am *not* a responsible, caring cat slave because my vet gave me different
> information to use in my decision making and I chose the more conservative
> approach.  Choosing *NOT* to spend money one doesn't have when it is *NOT*
> necessary is not being irresponsible or uncaring.

I never implied anything with regards to you. I said Ginger-Lyn was
doing a great thing to get her kitty taken care of  even though the
finances are compromised. It was a compliment to her.  If you want to
get defensive about that and twist it to make it about *you* (which it
wasn't) then I think you need to look within yourself rather than
accuse me of doing something I did not do.
CatNipped - 16 Apr 2008 20:29 GMT
On Apr 16, 1:48 pm, "CatNipped" <CatNip...@PossiblePlaces.com> wrote:

> Hematoma's can elicit much more pain than that of a bruise and while
> your cat may have been okay, many are not. My cat was a perfect
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> the
> possible risks to the surgery itself.

If you read Ginger-Lyn's original post, she said that the vet said
that if they drained it it would just fill up again and that surgery
was the only option. For that to be the case, it was probably very
similar to my cat's hematoma and I would venture a guess to say that
it was pretty large.

=========================================================

My vet also told me if they drained it it would just fill up again.  However
he also told me that surgery was *NOT* the only option that leaving it alone
to go away on its own was an option (and in his opionion, since that would
not involve the risks of anesthesia, the surgery itself, or infection from
breaching the skin, the *BEST* option).

I don't think either of us know the size of the hematoma or if that plays a
part in the decision of how to treat it.

=========================================================

> > More to the point, Ginger-lyn is in such *dire* financial straits now
> > that
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> situation, but it didn't appear to me that her vet had given her the same
> information mine gave me.

Again, they said they could drain it but it would just fill up again
and that surgery was the only option. It's clear they gave her the
alternative to surgery and also gave her the likely outcome to that
alternative.

=========================================================

Again, so did my vet say it would fill up again which is why he definitely
would *NOT* recommend that option - however he gave me another alternative
to surgery which, it appears, Ginger-lyn's vet did not give her.  I don't
know how to make it any clearer that I was only trying to give Ginger-lyn
information that her vet had obviously not given her.  Not all vets are
conservative, not all vets are ethical.  I have no idea what Ginger-lin's
vet may be like, but I question him not giving her all the options open to
her.  Saying that surgery was the only option is clearly wrong since I chose
another option that worked out perfectly well in the end without the pain of
an incision and stitches, without the risks associated with surgery and
without any drain on my already drained pocketbook.

==========================================================

> I'm sorry you find fault in my attempt to get information to her that may
> have given her some questions to ask her vet,

I did not find fault with what you did, and I never said I did. If you
look at my reply to you I simply pointed out that hematomas can be a
lot more serious than what you dealt with and that surgery is usually
warranted. Hematoma's aren't usually that easy to deal with. That was
all.

==========================================================

To say that surgery is usually warranted is wrong.  Have you ever had a
blood blister in your life?  Did your doctor feel the need to operate to
heal it?  My vet told me that surgery was not the only option that in fact
it was not the best option.

==========================================================

>but please don't imply that I
> am *not* a responsible, caring cat slave because my vet gave me different
> information to use in my decision making and I chose the more conservative
> approach. Choosing *NOT* to spend money one doesn't have when it is *NOT*
> necessary is not being irresponsible or uncaring.

=========================================================

I never implied anything with regards to you. I said Ginger-Lyn was
doing a great thing to get her kitty taken care of  even though the
finances are compromised. It was a compliment to her.  If you want to
get defensive about that and twist it to make it about *you* (which it
wasn't) then I think you need to look within yourself rather than
accuse me of doing something I did not do.

=========================================================

There was a reason I used the work "imply" rather than "state" - do you need
the definition of either word?  What Ginger-lyn did might not have been
"great", it may have been an uninformed (by her vet), misguided (by her
vet), wrong decision had something gone wrong during surgery.

It doesn't appear that you are being convinced by anything I have to say and
I'm certain that you are wrong in what you are saying, so lets just agree to
disagree before this gets out of hand.

Hugs,

CatNipped
Stormmee - 16 Apr 2008 20:37 GMT
cat nipped,

this is a general pattern I have seen with this poster and is why I have
blocked this individual, ginger made her decision, and all you did was offer
your experience, that is enough, Lee
> On Apr 16, 1:48 pm, "CatNipped" <CatNip...@PossiblePlaces.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 125 lines]
>
> CatNipped
CatNipped - 16 Apr 2008 21:09 GMT
> cat nipped,
>
> this is a general pattern I have seen with this poster and is why I have
> blocked this individual, ginger made her decision, and all you did was
> offer
> your experience, that is enough, Lee

Ah, I was beginning to wonder.  Thanks for the heads up.

Hugs,

CatNipped
Stormmee - 16 Apr 2008 21:10 GMT
I hate blocking people, but it is not in my tolerance level when someone is
always right, I mean we all have experience, different cats, different vets,
different issues, money, lifestyle and so on, but when one thinks they are
always right, or always anything for that matter, THEY need to look inside
themselves and see about that issue, Lee, not feeling very tolerant of
anything today
> > cat nipped,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> CatNipped
outsider - 16 Apr 2008 22:39 GMT
> I hate blocking people, but it is not in my tolerance level when
> someone is always right, I mean we all have experience, different
> cats, different vets, different issues, money, lifestyle and so on,
> but when one thinks they are always right, or always anything for that

Please do not block Lori, I am sure in time she will realize she should not
have called GLs vet unethical.  She is just having a busy time right now.
CatNipped - 16 Apr 2008 22:47 GMT
>> I hate blocking people, but it is not in my tolerance level when
>> someone is always right, I mean we all have experience, different
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> not
> have called GLs vet unethical.  She is just having a busy time right now.

LOL!  Sometimes UseNet reminds me of that game where kids line up and the
first one whispers something in the ear of the next and by the time it gets
to the end it turns into something entirely different.

JFTR  I didn't call Ginger-lyn's vet unethical and I apologize if it came
out that way.  I *DO* think it was wrong *IF* GL's vet did not mention to
her the "do nothing" option.

Hugs,

CatNipped
tripsovercats@msn.com - 16 Apr 2008 23:05 GMT
> JFTR  I didn't call Ginger-lyn's vet unethical

Well, yes you did and you did so without having any knowledge of the
actual conversation:

"More to the point, Ginger-lyn is in such *dire* financial straits now
that I
think the vet not giving her the same information my vet gave me is
really
unethical."
outsider - 16 Apr 2008 23:43 GMT
tripsovercats@msn.com wrote in news:13dc7393-eb8b-41e1-a9be-
40e4fa1cc04b@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com:

>> JFTR  I didn't call Ginger-lyn's vet unethical
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> really
> unethical."

Over time you will notice that Lori is a deeply emotional (read caring)
person and because of that she sometimes speaks in moral certainties that
strictly speaking may not be perfectly articulated.  I _like_ that about
her.  You on the other had like to speak with technical accuracy (to a
degree which may not be 100% appropriate for this type of group).  I like
_that_ about you (even if you ruffle feathers) but clearly you and Lori
(and some others) will always be somewhat incompatible.  Hopefully all of
use can look past those strange differences we have and see the cat
lovers we all are.

I now return to my regularly scheduled cynicism.
tripsovercats@msn.com - 16 Apr 2008 23:52 GMT
> tripsoverc...@msn.com wrote in news:13dc7393-eb8b-41e1-a9be-
> 40e4fa1cc...@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com:
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> I now return to my regularly scheduled cynicism.

Thank you for your thoughtful reply. :-) You're right in that my style
may not be 100% approriate for this group, but I'm glad you recognize
that I am indeed trying to be technically accurate. I am what I am and
I feel that it is very important, especially in discussions on health
issues, and even more especially when disagreement arises. I very much
appreciate your take on this.
~*LiveLoveLaugh*~ - 17 Apr 2008 00:44 GMT
On Apr 16, 5:43 pm, outsider <not@this_address.com> wrote:
> tripsoverc...@msn.com wrote in news:13dc7393-eb8b-41e1-a9be-
> 40e4fa1cc...@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com:
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> I now return to my regularly scheduled cynicism.

:Thank you for your thoughtful reply. :-) You're right in that my style
:may not be 100% approriate for this group, but I'm glad you recognize
:that I am indeed trying to be technically accurate. I am what I am and
:I feel that it is very important, especially in discussions on health
:issues, and even more especially when disagreement arises. I very much
:appreciate your take on this.

- - -

Have you tried RPCBH??  You'll fit in beautifully there...  or, you'll be
handed your lunch...  cold. ;o/

I am sure, to you, that you mean well, but folks in here think highly of
each other for so many more reasons then just our beloved cats.  If you
bicker too much, you'll end up in a recipe thread!  (Which is never a bad
thing)!!

Signature

·.·´¨ ¨))  -:¦:-
      ¸.·´  .·´¨¨))
      Laurie
  ((¸¸.·´  ..·´
    -:¦:-  ((¸¸ ·.·

*~*LiveLoveLaugh*~*

All that I am or hope to be, I owe to my angel mother.
~Abraham Lincoln

outsider - 17 Apr 2008 01:18 GMT
>> tripsoverc...@msn.com wrote in news:13dc7393-eb8b-41e1-a9be-
>> 40e4fa1cc...@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com:
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
> issues, and even more especially when disagreement arises. I very much
> appreciate your take on this.

I am a technologist and a lover of words and their exacted use.  
Unfortunately I also have very poor typing skills and am highly dyslexic
and because of that I run out of energy very quickly and end up speaking
(typing) less succinctly than I might like most of the time so I tend to
straddle the two worlds.  I do, however, appreciate accurate speech; it
tends to be easier for me to follow.  I like my science to be science and
my poetry to be poetry.  I hope that makes sense because I am about out
of energy and it is also my bedtime soon since I am up at 3:50.

later,

Andy
Matthew - 16 Apr 2008 23:57 GMT
> tripsovercats@msn.com wrote in news:13dc7393-eb8b-41e1-a9be-
> 40e4fa1cc04b@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com:
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> I now return to my regularly scheduled cynicism.

I thought that was your cats' jobs ;-)
outsider - 17 Apr 2008 01:21 GMT
>> tripsovercats@msn.com wrote in news:13dc7393-eb8b-41e1-a9be-
>> 40e4fa1cc04b@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com:
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>>
> I thought that was your cats' jobs ;-)

I am definitely more cynical than they are.  They keep me on the path.

Andy
Marina - 17 Apr 2008 04:33 GMT
> Over time you will notice that Lori is a deeply emotional (read caring)
> person and because of that she sometimes speaks in moral certainties that
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> use can look past those strange differences we have and see the cat
> lovers we all are.

Very good post, Andy. Very good.

Signature

Marina, Miranda and Caliban. In loving memory of Frank and Nikki.

outsider - 17 Apr 2008 22:01 GMT
>> Over time you will notice that Lori is a deeply emotional (read
>> caring) person and because of that she sometimes speaks in moral
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Very good post, Andy. Very good.

Thanks.
outsider - 16 Apr 2008 23:32 GMT
>>> I hate blocking people, but it is not in my tolerance level when
>>> someone is always right, I mean we all have experience, different
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> the first one whispers something in the ear of the next and by the
> time it gets to the end it turns into something entirely different.

We called it Telephone.

> JFTR  I didn't call Ginger-lyn's vet unethical and I apologize if it
> came out that way.  I *DO* think it was wrong *IF* GL's vet did not
> mention to her the "do nothing" option.

Actually I suspect the vet discussed the options but when people relay a
conversation they tend to abridge it to the end result but, of course,
you know I was just being a trouble-maker anyway.  What can I say?  It's
a gift!

Andy
Matthew - 16 Apr 2008 23:14 GMT
>> cat nipped,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> CatNipped
This was the same poster that last week told me I was endangering my Rumble
life because my vet did not know how to use proper nutrition to control his
diabetes since the vet has him on wet and dry food  but yet his sugar level
is normal as is his blood work.  This was because his vet said so  sorry I
still only trust my vet
tripsovercats@msn.com - 16 Apr 2008 23:28 GMT
> >news:66n301F2l57cpU2@mid.individual.net...
> >> cat nipped,
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> diabetes since the vet has him on wet and dry food  but yet his sugar level
> is normal as is his blood work.  

Matthew, I said that your cat was in danger of coming out of remission
if he is eating high carb food. This is not my opinion. It's a fact.
It happens all the time to diabetic cats that go back to eating dry
food. The carbs are harmful. They put stress an an already compromised
pancreas. Period. Have you ever tested your cat's blood sugar after 24
hours of being fed only low-carb canned food, then fed your diabetic a
dry meal and then tested his blood sugar again? If you actually did
this I can assure you you would be unpleasantly surprised. Why do you
think cats go into remission when dry food is eliminated from the
diet? The stress of unnecessary carbs and the glucose toxicity that is
a result of the dry food diet is removed from the equation. That's
why.

Now, if you want to stop being childish and feel something I have said
in this discussion is inaccurate and would like to discuss it or
present a different take, by all means be my guest. But if you want to
join in libeling Ginger-Lyn's vet or implying she is stupid or
incapable of making thoughful decisions with regards to the
appropriate care of Cosmo then I will take issue with that. Instead of
making this your own personal vendetta, why not just stick to the
issue at hand.
~*LiveLoveLaugh*~ - 16 Apr 2008 23:49 GMT
On Apr 16, 5:14 pm, "Matthew" <Iamacatsl...@proudtoserve.com> wrote:
> "CatNipped" <CatNip...@PossiblePlaces.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> diabetes since the vet has him on wet and dry food but yet his sugar level
> is normal as is his blood work.

Matthew, I said that your cat was in danger of coming out of remission
if he is eating high carb food. This is not my opinion. It's a fact.
It happens all the time to diabetic cats that go back to eating dry
food. The carbs are harmful. They put stress an an already compromised
pancreas. Period. Have you ever tested your cat's blood sugar after 24
hours of being fed only low-carb canned food, then fed your diabetic a
dry meal and then tested his blood sugar again? If you actually did
this I can assure you you would be unpleasantly surprised. Why do you
think cats go into remission when dry food is eliminated from the
diet? The stress of unnecessary carbs and the glucose toxicity that is
a result of the dry food diet is removed from the equation. That's
why.

Now, if you want to stop being childish and feel something I have said
in this discussion is inaccurate and would like to discuss it or
present a different take, by all means be my guest. But if you want to
join in libeling Ginger-Lyn's vet or implying she is stupid or
incapable of making thoughful decisions with regards to the
appropriate care of Cosmo then I will take issue with that. Instead of
making this your own personal vendetta, why not just stick to the
issue at hand.

- - - -- -  - -

First you tried to tell CatNipped that she was trying to make it "about
her".  Now you're telling Matthew he's trying to make this his "personal
vendetta".

Purrsonally, I think you're a real pain in the a.s!!  (But hey, I could be
making this all about me)!!  ;oP

Signature

·.·´¨ ¨))  -:¦:-
      ¸.·´  .·´¨¨))
      Laurie
  ((¸¸.·´  ..·´
    -:¦:-  ((¸¸ ·.·

*~*LiveLoveLaugh*~*

All that I am or hope to be, I owe to my angel mother.
~Abraham Lincoln

Matthew - 17 Apr 2008 00:01 GMT
> On Apr 16, 5:14 pm, "Matthew" <Iamacatsl...@proudtoserve.com> wrote:
>> "CatNipped" <CatNip...@PossiblePlaces.com> wrote in message
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
> Purrsonally, I think you're a real pain in the a.s!!  (But hey, I could be
> making this all about me)!!  ;oP

I knew there was a reason I was in love with you ;-)
Stormmee - 17 Apr 2008 00:35 GMT
the two of you are going to owe me a keyboard, and you are going to have to
give my 20 pound cat a bath if you keep this up, he does NOT like coffee on
his furs, Lee

> > <tripsovercats@msn.com> wrote in message

news:3b83141c-de3b-4a0a-b2d9-db2c08cd8bf2@a23g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> > On Apr 16, 5:14 pm, "Matthew" <Iamacatsl...@proudtoserve.com> wrote:
> >> "CatNipped" <CatNip...@PossiblePlaces.com> wrote in message
[quoted text clipped - 69 lines]
> >
> I knew there was a reason I was in love with you ;-)
~*LiveLoveLaugh*~ - 17 Apr 2008 00:45 GMT
>> On Apr 16, 5:14 pm, "Matthew" <Iamacatsl...@proudtoserve.com> wrote:
>>> "CatNipped" <CatNip...@PossiblePlaces.com> wrote in message
[quoted text clipped - 57 lines]
>>
> I knew there was a reason I was in love with you ;-)

:)xxoo!

Signature

·.·´¨ ¨))  -:¦:-
      ¸.·´  .·´¨¨))
      Laurie
  ((¸¸.·´  ..·´
    -:¦:-  ((¸¸ ·.·

*~*LiveLoveLaugh*~*

All that I am or hope to be, I owe to my angel mother.
~Abraham Lincoln

Stormmee - 17 Apr 2008 00:33 GMT
that needed a BW, Lee
> On Apr 16, 5:14 pm, "Matthew" <Iamacatsl...@proudtoserve.com> wrote:
> > "CatNipped" <CatNip...@PossiblePlaces.com> wrote in message
[quoted text clipped - 66 lines]
> All that I am or hope to be, I owe to my angel mother.
> ~Abraham Lincoln
Matthew - 17 Apr 2008 00:01 GMT
<tripsovercats@msn.com>

< snipped >.

Again I trust my vet not a newbie or their vet who I don't know from a hole
in the wall.

Again  as newbie which you are here. I think you really need some people
skills and calm down.

I think you are passionate about what you think you know and technically
understand but cramming it down someone else's throat will never work an any
way.  Also arguing with someone who is trying to help than saying what you
are saying who is the one being childish.

I am ginger Lynn friend along with Catnipped also being a friend of both of
us.  There are plenty of her friends here that she trust.  I have never and
never will ever call her stupid or incapable of doing something.

I really think you need to get of your high horse.
tripsovercats@msn.com - 16 Apr 2008 21:23 GMT
> My vet also told me if they drained it it would just fill up again.  However
> he also told me that surgery was *NOT* the only option that leaving it alone
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> I don't think either of us know the size of the hematoma or if that plays a
> part in the decision of how to treat it.

Exactly. That's why I said I guessed, as this is what we see in the
clinic and I experienced myself. Again, you did not witness the
conversation between Ginger-Lyn and her vet, yet you are stating that
the vet did not give her all the options. You can't possibly know
that, or even what the options were in consideration of that
particular injury, and are even stating that the vet is unethical. All
this based on next to no information.

> > > More to the point, Ginger-lyn is in such *dire* financial straits now
> > > that
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
> would *NOT* recommend that option - however he gave me another alternative
> to surgery which, it appears, Ginger-lyn's vet did not give her.  

Again, she clearly stated that the vet examined Cosmo and said surgery
was the "only" option. There was obviously a reason for that, but
since neither you or I were there all we can do is speculate. I
speculated based on  what I have seen come through the clinic and my
own cat's hematoma. What I take issue with is your drive to badmouth
this vet and make it sound like they are cheating Ginger-Lyn without
ANY evidence of this being the case.

>I don't
> know how to make it any clearer that I was only trying to give Ginger-lyn
> information that her vet had obviously not given her.  Not all vets are
> conservative, not all vets are ethical.  I have no idea what Ginger-lin's
> vet may be like, but I question him not giving her all the options open to
> her.  

You don't know what was discussed so you can't possibly make a
statement saying what was discussed.

>Saying that surgery was the only option is clearly wrong

YOU DON"T KNOW THIS. You weren't there, you are not a vet, you did not
see the injury and as such cannot honestly come to this conclusion.

> To say that surgery is usually warranted is wrong.  Have you ever had a
> blood blister in your life?  

I suggest you do some research. A hematoma on an animal's ear is not
the same as a blood blister on a human.

>Did your doctor feel the need to operate to
> heal it?  My vet told me that surgery was not the only option that in fact
> it was not the best option.

In *your* case.

> I never implied anything with regards to you. I said Ginger-Lyn was
> doing a great thing to get her kitty taken care of  even though the
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> There was a reason I used the work "imply" rather than "state" - do you need
> the definition of either word?  

No. To imply is to express or state indirectly. I did no such thing.
Again, I gave Ginger-Lyn a compliment and nothing more. I understand
her situation very well as I have been there myself several times, but
where there is a will there is a way and kudos to her for finding a
way. Too many times we see people come through the clinic that *have*
the money to spend, but they are too cheap to do what's needed and the
animals are the ones that ultimately pay the price. And there's
nothing we can do about it. So when I see someone go to the wire for
their animal you bet your a.s I'm going to let them know that there
are some people out there that appreciate what they've done.
If you want to twist it to make it about you maybe it's because you're
feeling guilty about not spending money when maybe you should have. I
don't know. But what I do know is that it wasn't about "you* nor was
it implied. Period.

>What Ginger-lyn did might not have been
> "great", it may have been an uninformed (by her vet), misguided (by her
> vet), wrong decision had something gone wrong during surgery.

Do you realize how insulting this statement is to Ginger-Lyn? You make
it sound as though she is stupid and gullible. I have a little more
faith in her capabilities than you do apparently.You also make it
sound as though her vet is an unethical charlatan when you have
nothing absolutely to base this on.

> It doesn't appear that you are being convinced by anything I have to say and
> I'm certain that you are wrong in what you are saying, so lets just agree to
> disagree before this gets out of hand.

You have offered nothing other than speculation and libeling of the
vet with no facts to base it on.
Matthew - 16 Apr 2008 23:11 GMT
<tripsovercats@msn.com>

< snipped >

I think you need to learn how to talk to people  you are coming off as pushy
and over zealous.  No one will tolerate this so you are ending up in people
kill files
Ginger-lyn - 17 Apr 2008 00:23 GMT
I feel I need to jump in here, considering this thread is about me and
my cat and my decisions.

I have e-mailed both parties with my feelings, and in general, I think
that is where they belong -- in private e-mail.

I will only say that each situation is different, and what may be right
for one may be wrong for the other.  I believe I made the right decision
for Cosmo; I could not allow him to suffer in pain needlessly, and I
wanted to give him a chance to not be in pain and to feel better again,
and to live out what life is left to him (and I believe he has quite a
bit of life left to him; as someone posted, he *is* a strong cat).

Catnipped is someone I consider a friend, and tripsovercats is new here.
 But in this case, tripsovercats was completely accurate about my
situation, what happened, the hematoma, etc.  He/she may have come
across to some too strongly, but his/her words comforted me greatly.  I
hope everyone will give him/her a chance, as it sounds like
tripsovercats may have a great deal of insight to offer here.

I also believe Catnipped was only trying to help, and only had the best
of intentions.  But I believe in this situation, her advice was wrong.
I hope that in saying that, we remain friends.

So, please, let's stop this.  I do not want to be the cause of hurt and
angry feelings here.

Please just remember that Cosmo made it through the surgery (a surgery
both the vet and I agreed was necessary), that he has a good chance of
recovery, and that your wonderful purrs and prayers made all the difference.

Ginger-lyn
Matthew - 17 Apr 2008 00:37 GMT
"Ginger-lyn" <SabraCat@planetoid.net>

No problem Ginger  I am still praying and the pack is still purring till
Cosmo is home.  I am glad everything so far has come out great.  I was
worried about you both

Trips over cats is more than welcome here

He/she seems to know a lot about cats but just needs to tone it down and
calm down a bit  for this group IMO.
Stormmee - 17 Apr 2008 00:42 GMT
you are a very good person, Lee
> I feel I need to jump in here, considering this thread is about me and
> my cat and my decisions.
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
> Ginger-lyn
Bobblespin - 17 Apr 2008 00:42 GMT
> I feel I need to jump in here, considering this thread is about me and
> my cat and my decisions.
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>
> Ginger-lyn

Amen.
CatNipped - 17 Apr 2008 00:53 GMT
>I feel I need to jump in here, considering this thread is about me and my
>cat and my decisions.
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>
> Ginger-lyn

I didn't mean to stir trouble (she says in the midst of trouble she
stirred), but only wanted to give you sound advice that my vet gave me (and
that worked well for me AND my cat).  As you may or may not have noticed I
stopped quite a while ago and if "tripsovercats" is determined (as s/he
seems to be) to carry on this argument s/he'll have to do so without me.

BTW, *did* you vet advise you that a hematoma will be naturally reabsorbed
by the body if left untreated?  Demi's looked horrible, but she was not in
pain and continued to play and eat normally until it eventually went away.

Hugs,

CatNipped
CatNipped - 17 Apr 2008 01:07 GMT
BTW, here is a bit more info on hematomas since this is a condition that,
once a cat has it, can recur throughout the rest of their lives - and there
really *IS* an alternative to surgery...

From:  http://www.sniksnak.com/cathealth/hematoma.html
"It is an uncomfortable, rather than painful, condition."

From:
http://www.dolittler.com/index.cfm/2007/8/13/pet.vet.dog.cat.ear%20hematoma.vete
rinary

"Having suffered this condition multiple times with my long-lost Agatha (a
boxer who saw me through vet school), it irks me a little that hematomas are
almost invariably treated surgically. The first episode found me repairing
the ear with painful consequences. The two following episodes healed
blissfully (though somewhat less attractively) on their own. Given a choice,
I'd opt always for less pain, more crinkling."

My vet told me that the only reason for surgery is to prevent disfigurement.
It was my choice to let my pretty little Demi have a cauliflower ear rather
than submit her to the stress and risks of surgery.

Signature

Hugs,

CatNipped

See all my masters at:  http://www.PossiblePlaces.com/CatNipped/

tripsovercats@msn.com - 17 Apr 2008 01:35 GMT
> BTW, here is a bit more info on hematomas since this is a condition that,
> once a cat has it, can recur throughout the rest of their lives - and there
> really *IS* an alternative to surgery...
>
> From:  http://www.sniksnak.com/cathealth/hematoma.html
> "It is an uncomfortable, rather than painful, condition."

From peteducation.com:
"Ear hematomas, medically known as 'aural hematomas' or 'auricular
hematomas,' are a collection of blood and fluid between the skin and
cartilage of the ear. A blood vessel in the ear ruptures and the loose
space under the skin will fill up with blood. The pressure from the
ruptured vessel will often cause the entire surface of the ear to
swell creating a very painful condition. These hematomas will occur
very quickly, often within minutes of the vessel being ruptured.

Affected animals will have a noticeably swollen, fluid-filled ear that
is extremely painful to the touch.

If left untreated, the pain will subside somewhat after several days,
but the swelling will continue and eventually, as the fluid-filled
space generates scar tissue, the ear may become permanently
disfigured."

This is not something I would choose to have any of my cats endure for
who knows how long. Having gone the surgery route, I can report that
my cat got quick relief and the healing was fairly fast.

> My vet told me that the only reason for surgery is to prevent disfigurement.
> It was my choice to let my pretty little Demi have a cauliflower ear rather
> than submit her to the stress and risks of surgery.

And that is your choice and may have worked with your cat, but if you
did a little more research you would find that the prognosis using a
conservative treatment is poor (one site states about 50%.) Google
hematoma ear treatment cats and you'll find plenty of cites. Surgery
is by far the treatment of choice and in many instances, as in cases
of large vessel ruptures, the only effective treatment. Also,
interestingly, it appears that hematomas rarely recur in areas where
there has been a surgical repair.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.