Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / Cat Anecdotes / April 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Nanki-Poo had his first radiation treatment today

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Joy - 04 Apr 2008 08:25 GMT
What an ordeal! I picked up the food in the morning, and blocked the door in
the middle of the afternoon when I knew both cats were in. It wasn't too
hard to catch Nanki-Poo when it was time, but he struggled a lot when I was
putting him in the carrier, and he kept struggling once he was inside. He
cried pitifully for several minutes, was quiet for a while, then cried the
rest of the way. The TomTom wasn't much help, because it didn't want me to
go the back way. It kept telling me to turn around. When I finally got on
the freeway, it figured things out and took me to the right place. At first
I still couldn't find it. It was in a long area like a strip mall. Most of
the businesses didn't have any addresses, or they had suite numbers. I had
the instruction sheet I'd been given, and was looking at the top. That sheet
had been give to me at the oncologist's office, and what it said at the top
was the name of that business. Finally I found the real name, and saw where
the business was.

I tried the front door and it was locked. Then I thought I remembered
something about going to the back door. I walked around in back, carrying
Nanki-Poo in his carrier. Then, when I got to the back, none of the doors
were marked, so I wasn't sure which one it was. A man saw me and told me the
right one. He was just leaving after having his cat or dog treated. He said
they usually put a sign on the door, but there wasn't one today. He said you
have to knock. I did, and nothing happened. Then a woman from the parking
came up to me and asked if I was there to have my cat treated. I said yes,
and she said she was there for the same thing. She said her appointment had
been for 5:45, but she hadn't found a way to get in. I told her what the man
had said, and then used my keys to knock louder.

She went back to her car, and someone finally opened the door. My
appointment wasn't until 6:30, so I told him about the woman. He said they'd
take her cat first, and then take Nanki-Poo. I was early, and her
appointment was before mine, so that was fine with me. He said he couldn't
let anybody in the building. I carried Nanki in his carrier around in front
where I'd parked, drove around and parked in back. A little before 6:15,
somebody brought the woman's cat back to her car. A little later a woman
came out looking for me. She took Nanki in. I asked her if she knew where I
could find a rest room, and she apologized for not being able to let me in.
She told me there was a McDonald's a little way down the street, and that it
would be about half an hour to 45 minutes.

I went to McDonald's, and while I was there I decided I might as well get
something to eat, because I was already tired and knew I wouldn't feel like
cooking by the time I got home. Then I drove back, ate in the car, and
waited. And waited. At 7:15, I tried knocking on the door with my keys, but
nobody came. I got in my car and looked for a phone number on the papers I'd
been given. I couldn't find a phone number for the facility. The name of it
was there, so I called Information, but they couldn't find a phone number
either. I remembered that the oncologist had said their facility was open
24/7, so I called them and asked for the phone number. The phone rang a long
time before somebody answered. Then I was put on hold. When I finally got to
talk to somebody, I explained, and she put me on hold again. After a minute
or two, she came back on and asked me to spell my last name. Then she put me
back on hold. I waited several minutes, and then somebody came out and over
to my car, so I hung up. The woman who came out said that it would be
another 10 minutes or so, because they wanted to wait for him to wake up
from the anesthetic.

Finally, about 7:35, the man I'd talked to first brought Nanki out. He
explained that they were treating him on both sides of the neck and had done
some sort of imaging to make sure they had the right spot. He said that it
wouldn't take so long after this. Nanki-Poo complained for a while once we
started home, but then he was quiet for a long time. I think he was probably
sleeping. Eventually he woke up and complained some more. I finally got home
about 8:20. I was really wiped out, and very glad I'd eaten. I can't afford
to eat out every day, so I think after this I'll take a sandwich to eat
while I wait.

When we got home, Nanki-Poo wanted to go out, but he was still groggy, so I
didn't think that was a good idea. I shoed him the litter box, then started
fixing their food. He came out and ate. Every time I was in the kitchen, he
went to the back door wanting out, but I wouldn't open it. I watched some
TV, and after a while he got up and napped on my lap. I had to put him down
when I finally got up. He seems okay, but he's obviously still groggy. I'd
been told it would wear off pretty quickly, so I'm hoping they kept him out
longer because of the extra imaging they did, and after this it won't last
so long.

Signature

Joy

My mind is like a parachute...it functions only when open.

bastXXXette@sonic.net - 04 Apr 2008 08:36 GMT
> What an ordeal!

Wow, I'll say! What a frustrating evening. It seems weird to me that
they don't let you into the building - do you know why? And all that
about having to go to a back door and knock? Maybe this is normal
procedure for such a place, but I would be put off by it. From the
description, it sounds like you showed phenomenal patience in the face
of very frustrating circumstances. I would've been hysterical - I
don't tolerate frustration and unexplained strangeness very well.

Purrs for Nanki! I hope the treatment works well for him. Sounds like
he had an exhausting day, too.

Rest well,

Joyce

To email me, remove the triple-X from my user name.  ^..^
Joy - 04 Apr 2008 09:01 GMT
> > What an ordeal!
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Joyce

No, I don't know why.  It bothered me too.  It almost seemed as though they
were doing something illegal or something.  I have to call about something
else tomorrow, so I think I'll ask about that while I'm at it.

I think by the time I finally found the place, I was too tired to express
much frustration.  I also knew I had to save some energy for the drive home.

Thanks for the purrs.  Yes, I'm sure being cooped up so much and riding in
the car for so long was very frustrating and exhausting for him, and not
being allowed to go outside once he got home must have added insult to
injury.

Joy
Charleen Welton - 04 Apr 2008 11:54 GMT
Many purrs and wishes for strength for you and Nanki as you do this.
Charleen

>> > What an ordeal!
>>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> Joy
Joy - 04 Apr 2008 18:43 GMT
Thank you, Charleen.

Signature

Joy

My mind is like a parachute...it functions only when open.

> Many purrs and wishes for strength for you and Nanki as you do this.
> Charleen
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>>
>> Joy
Marina - 04 Apr 2008 12:28 GMT
> No, I don't know why.  It bothered me too.  It almost seemed as though they
> were doing something illegal or something.  I have to call about something
> else tomorrow, so I think I'll ask about that while I'm at it.

Yes, it all sounds very strange to me too. But in the end, what's
important is that it works and has the desired effect on Nanki-Poo. We
are purring to that end. Also purring for his Meowmie who has an
exhausting time ahead of her.

Signature

Marina, Miranda and Caliban. In loving memory of Frank and Nikki.

Joy - 04 Apr 2008 18:43 GMT
>> No, I don't know why.  It bothered me too.  It almost seemed as though
>> they were doing something illegal or something.  I have to call about
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> purring to that end. Also purring for his Meowmie who has an exhausting
> time ahead of her.

Thank you, Marina.  Those purrs are much appreciated.

Joy
Kyla  =^. .^= - 04 Apr 2008 23:24 GMT
<bastXXXette

> Joy
> > What an ordeal!
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> of very frustrating circumstances. I would've been hysterical - I
> don't tolerate frustration and unexplained strangeness very well.

Same here, Kyla interjected. Poor Nanki-Poo and poor you
for having to go thru such an ordeal :(
Did you get the e-mail I sent you um, day before yesterday, Joy?

> Purrs for Nanki! I hope the treatment works well for him. Sounds like
> he had an exhausting day, too.

> Rest well,
>
> Joyce
>
> To email me, remove the triple-X from my user name.  ^..^

Major purrs coming from us as well, and hope you
get the much needed rest you need.
Hug
Kyla
Mosey gives Nanki-Poo a healing <nosepoink>
he feels bad about Nanki-Poo  =^;;^=
Joy - 04 Apr 2008 23:28 GMT
> <bastXXXette
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> for having to go thru such an ordeal :(
> Did you get the e-mail I sent you um, day before yesterday, Joy?

Oops!  Yes, I did.  I'll answer it soon.

>> Purrs for Nanki! I hope the treatment works well for him. Sounds like
>> he had an exhausting day, too.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Mosey gives Nanki-Poo a healing <nosepoink>
> he feels bad about Nanki-Poo  =^;;^=

Thank you, Kyla.

Joy
dberry@mitre.org - 04 Apr 2008 16:13 GMT
Purrs for the radiation treatment to be helpful and painless for Nanki-
Poo,
and purrs of comfort and strength for you.

Debbie

> What an ordeal! I picked up the food in the morning, and blocked the door in
> the middle of the afternoon when I knew both cats were in. It wasn't too
[quoted text clipped - 76 lines]
>
> My mind is like a parachute...it functions only when open.
Joy - 04 Apr 2008 18:44 GMT
Thank you, Debbie.

Signature

Joy

My mind is like a parachute...it functions only when open.

Purrs for the radiation treatment to be helpful and painless for Nanki-
Poo,
and purrs of comfort and strength for you.

Debbie

On Apr 4, 3:25 am, "Joy" <toas...@real-me.net> wrote:
> What an ordeal! I picked up the food in the morning, and blocked the door
> in
[quoted text clipped - 110 lines]
>
> My mind is like a parachute...it functions only when open.
CatNipped - 04 Apr 2008 17:07 GMT
> What an ordeal! I picked up the food in the morning, and blocked the door
> in the middle of the afternoon when I knew both cats were in. It wasn't
[quoted text clipped - 71 lines]
> hoping they kept him out longer because of the extra imaging they did, and
> after this it won't last so long.

My goodness!!  What a horrible way to run a business.  I would have been
terribly worried and p*ssed off at that kind of shady dealings!  Is there
somewhere else your oncologist can refer you to?

{{{{{{{{{{Joy and Nanki-Poo}}}}}}}}}}

Hugs,

CatNipped
Joy - 04 Apr 2008 18:47 GMT
> My goodness!!  What a horrible way to run a business.  I would have been
> terribly worried and p*ssed off at that kind of shady dealings!  Is there
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> CatNipped

Thank you, CatNipped.  The facility is 37 miles from my house, and I asked
the oncologist before we started if there were any place closer where I
could go.  He said the only other one he knew of was in Culver City, which
is even farther from me, and would mean a trip down a freeway that is always
crowded and slow, with lots of accidents to boot.

I have a call in to him, because I have some question, including the reasons
why this is done as though it were a back alley abortion clinic or
something.

Joy
CatNipped - 04 Apr 2008 18:47 GMT
>> My goodness!!  What a horrible way to run a business.  I would have been
>> terribly worried and p*ssed off at that kind of shady dealings!  Is there
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Joy

Oh dear, that sucks!  Please let us know - I hope to never have to go
through this but you never know and information may come in handy.

Hugs,

CatNipped
hopitus - 04 Apr 2008 17:13 GMT
> What an ordeal! I picked up the food in the morning, and blocked the door in
> the middle of the afternoon when I knew both cats were in. It wasn't too
[quoted text clipped - 76 lines]
>
> My mind is like a parachute...it functions only when open.

I'll make this fairly short including purrs for Nanki. I am retired
nationally-licensed radiology tech
and what your cat is having is called radiation therapy; it takes an
additional year of study and a
very tough license exam, but such as I are licensed and able to
*assist* in this practice, but not
unsupervised.....which I did when working in facilities having a rad
therapy section of radiology.
All the above re hoomin patients.
Now: I never worked on animals but there is nothing mysterious and
nothing to be worried nor
indignant about....except maybe lack of explanation from employees you
dealt with. Forget the
other pet owners....they don't know any more than you do therefore
can't be blamed for lack of
411 to you. Rad therapy rooms in hospitals have doors that cannot be
opened except by special
switches only personnel know locations of. If a non-patient (or in
your case, pet owner) managed
to get into the therapy room you would get a blast of ionizing
radiation from the machine, which
once calculated and set up, runs automatically, circulating in a 360o
orbit around purple-pen marked
bullseye tumor or whatever on restrained patient. This is hoomins I am
talking. The tech is outside
the treatment room, watching through radiation proof window the whole
time.
A sad word of heads-up to Joy: Nanki may lose fur bigtime, just like
those breast cancer women
you see bald from having this same thing - radiation and/or
chemo...did you think breast cancer
made them bald? Uh uh. Hope Nanki doesn't lose fur but just warning in
case he does it is a
side effect of radiation.
This as I said is the short version. Glad to be of help. Therapy techs
in my former work are among
the highest regarded of all types. I was a simple hard working ER
trauma tech. There is NO way
I wanted to do therapy, I only assisted now and then, setting up
patients or doing a smaller machine
called "ortho" unit which treated keloids (scars) and skin
cancers....not the big guns mentioned
above. As I stated before, I don't do death well. Rad therapy is
*treatment* radiation, not the
diagnostic kind I used for 30 years.
Summation: I don't really know but suspect the locked doors and
"escort" vet personnel were simply
trying to do what we all in rad tech employment do: keep non-patients
out of radiation area.
CatNipped - 04 Apr 2008 17:31 GMT
I'll make this fairly short including purrs for Nanki. I am retired
nationally-licensed radiology tech
and what your cat is having is called radiation therapy; it takes an
additional year of study and a
very tough license exam, but such as I are licensed and able to
*assist* in this practice, but not
unsupervised.....which I did when working in facilities having a rad
therapy section of radiology.
All the above re hoomin patients.
Now: I never worked on animals but there is nothing mysterious and
nothing to be worried nor
indignant about....except maybe lack of explanation from employees you
dealt with. Forget the
other pet owners....they don't know any more than you do therefore
can't be blamed for lack of
411 to you. Rad therapy rooms in hospitals have doors that cannot be
opened except by special
switches only personnel know locations of. If a non-patient (or in
your case, pet owner) managed
to get into the therapy room you would get a blast of ionizing
radiation from the machine, which
once calculated and set up, runs automatically, circulating in a 360o
orbit around purple-pen marked
bullseye tumor or whatever on restrained patient. This is hoomins I am
talking. The tech is outside
the treatment room, watching through radiation proof window the whole
time.
A sad word of heads-up to Joy: Nanki may lose fur bigtime, just like
those breast cancer women
you see bald from having this same thing - radiation and/or
chemo...did you think breast cancer
made them bald? Uh uh. Hope Nanki doesn't lose fur but just warning in
case he does it is a
side effect of radiation.
This as I said is the short version. Glad to be of help. Therapy techs
in my former work are among
the highest regarded of all types. I was a simple hard working ER
trauma tech. There is NO way
I wanted to do therapy, I only assisted now and then, setting up
patients or doing a smaller machine
called "ortho" unit which treated keloids (scars) and skin
cancers....not the big guns mentioned
above. As I stated before, I don't do death well. Rad therapy is
*treatment* radiation, not the
diagnostic kind I used for 30 years.
Summation: I don't really know but suspect the locked doors and
"escort" vet personnel were simply
trying to do what we all in rad tech employment do: keep non-patients
out of radiation area.

==============================================================

I can understand the need for a secure/protected area because radiation is
dangerous.  But is it impossible for them to have a safe waiting area?  It
would also be nice if they had a tech explain what's going on - or at the
very least a brochure detailing the procedure.  And not being able to get in
touch with someone (i.e. knocking at a door that nobody answers, and not
having a phone number) when they had possession of my pet would have freaked
me out BIG TIME!  For goodness sake, at least have a buzzer intercom at the
back door for concerned pet parents if there's not enough space for a
waiting area.  Waiting in your car for hours (in the heat or cold) for
someone to come out to pick up or bring you your pet sounds like the
scenario of a drug deal!!

Hugs,

CatNipped
Joy - 04 Apr 2008 18:52 GMT
> I'll make this fairly short including purrs for Nanki. I am retired
> nationally-licensed radiology tech
[quoted text clipped - 63 lines]
>
> CatNipped

It made me think of the illegal back alley abortion clinics there used to be
before Roe v. Wade.

Joy
hopitus - 04 Apr 2008 18:54 GMT
> I'll make this fairly short including purrs for Nanki. I am retired
> nationally-licensed radiology tech
[quoted text clipped - 63 lines]
>
> CatNipped

Yes, I agree...lack of instruction/communication from vet facility to
pet owners is
what I fault, not their physical precautions. Joy, why don't you have
a talk with
the *vet* who actually owns the practice and explain that the secrecy
and
inconvenience are factors which make returning to his/her practice
less than
appealing to owners? His/her (vet) employees are NOT under the same
mandates
and educational requirements as I and all other licensed rad
techs....there are
NO rules for working on animals using any form of treatment except
maybe
cruelty statutes locally.
One problem with effectiveness of complaining; as you have no doubt
found out
radiation treatment facilities for animals are very few and far
between generally,
not like normal vet offices.....main reason is you can;t just buy
radiation equipment
(heavily regulated and restrictive by Fed. laws) and set up a shop
anywhere you
wish  It don't as they say take a rocket scientist to figure out
'WHY', LOL. We
are talking ionizing (google that) gamma radiation after all. So this
therapy vet
has NO federal mandates except to do what got everybody going....keep
hoomins
OUT of range of any scatter from his therapy-power machinery in there.
After all,
he is NOT working and/or treating hoomins. AFAIC being who I am
profession-wise,
your valid complaint 100% is the lack of compassion, instruction, and
even some
sort of written preparation for the experience. No ordinary vet visit
to TED indeed.
But *this* TED does what he/she does for one purpose ethically: to
prolong pet lives.
CatNipped - 04 Apr 2008 19:07 GMT
On Apr 4, 10:31 am, "CatNipped" <CatNip...@PossiblePlaces.com> wrote:
> "hopitus" <hopi...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 69 lines]
>
> CatNipped

Yes, I agree...lack of instruction/communication from vet facility to
pet owners is
what I fault, not their physical precautions. Joy, why don't you have
a talk with
the *vet* who actually owns the practice and explain that the secrecy
and
inconvenience are factors which make returning to his/her practice
less than
appealing to owners? His/her (vet) employees are NOT under the same
mandates
and educational requirements as I and all other licensed rad
techs....there are
NO rules for working on animals using any form of treatment except
maybe
cruelty statutes locally.
One problem with effectiveness of complaining; as you have no doubt
found out
radiation treatment facilities for animals are very few and far
between generally,
not like normal vet offices.....main reason is you can;t just buy
radiation equipment
(heavily regulated and restrictive by Fed. laws) and set up a shop
anywhere you
wish  It don't as they say take a rocket scientist to figure out
'WHY', LOL. We
are talking ionizing (google that) gamma radiation after all. So this
therapy vet
has NO federal mandates except to do what got everybody going....keep
hoomins
OUT of range of any scatter from his therapy-power machinery in there.
After all,
he is NOT working and/or treating hoomins. AFAIC being who I am
profession-wise,
your valid complaint 100% is the lack of compassion, instruction, and
even some
sort of written preparation for the experience. No ordinary vet visit
to TED indeed.
But *this* TED does what he/she does for one purpose ethically: to
prolong pet lives.

====================================================

You know, this made me remember another discussion on the "other" cat group
from quite a while ago.  A cat was undergoing radiation therapy for thyroid
disease and she had to leave the cat at the facility until a few weeks after
treatment stopped because the cat's waste products (litterbox offerings)
were hazardous under some regulation or other.  I wonder what's up with all
this - I'd love more information about it all.

Hugs,

CatNipped
hopitus - 04 Apr 2008 19:53 GMT
> On Apr 4, 10:31 am, "CatNipped" <CatNip...@PossiblePlaces.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 126 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
Yeah, I remember the h&b posts awhile ago you mention. Sorry, the
subject
is something I had to spend 2 years in school studying and 30 years
practicing
and the long posts here about it are for rpca friends information and
are really
really limited 411. Hops 95% in lurk mode in that ng, LOL.
Alternatively, I
am concerned Joy and others who may someday have this treatment option
to 'have a clue;; about a generally unpleasant subject.
Tell you something else; in all those ERs, I endured attitudes and
treatment from
patients varying from 'ffriendly cooperation' to 'inebriated inability
to cooperate' to
"downright hostility/violence' LOL but I liked the non-familiarity and
fast pace of
Class 1 trauma center ER work. Radiation therapy techs are in general
treated
to a whole different bunch of attitudes...they tell me that most of
their adult patients
know *exactly* why they are there, and what the tech/machine is doing
for them,
and act toward the techs, who after all are treating them (all those
years I was only
finding out what their problems were) just like they would toward
nurses in hospice
or intensive care units - respect, obedience, and even fondness.
Now that my memory re the cat poop is jogged - that vet as well
evidently didn't
tell the cat's owner why the poop was kept, with their cat,
hospitalized for radiation
recautions. What is it with these oncology vets? Maybe they think
like, 'what they
don't know won't hurt them.....'
hopitus - 04 Apr 2008 19:23 GMT
> > "hopitus" <hopi...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 109 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

One further comment....this oncology vet needs a lesson in manners,
IMHO,
or perhaps he is just unaware ot the perceived cold atmosphere of no
waiting'
area, sitting prolonged periods in owners vehicles, complete non-411
on not
only what happening in there, but what to expect later on in the next
few days.
Let me explain something; radiation is radiation period and for
hoomins, not
the same dose of the big guns, as we call them, is used for every
patient....
the doc vet may have a therapy machine outmoded by the newer models,
which beam their dosage levels out just like my xray ER
machines....like a
ray (beam) of light. Older model machines used cobalt - a high-
radioactive
isotope controlled by user-operator opening of a little 'door'
permitting exposure
of patient to the isotope's radiation for a brief time (dose). These
older models
are still in use, still good, as cobalt has a very long half-life
(effectiveness level)
but unlike state-of-the-art models used today in hospitals on hoomins,
the
treatment dose is harder to control, because you are dealing with a
substance
not an electrically generated radiation source, instantly under
control by an
on/off switch. All this dose stuff is inspected and approved by a
radiation
therapy oncologist, a form of radiologist. Still talking hoomins here.
No matter how much $ this oncology vet makes from his practice, there
is no
way he could afford nor be approved by the Feds for a state-of-the-art
therapy
machine! If he has in fact an isotope-source older model - I'm sure
his patients
get a tiny fraction of what would have been used on any hoomin for any
disease -
I can't fault his precautions to the public .Manners, or P.R. is key
word here.
Kyla  =^. .^= - 04 Apr 2008 23:40 GMT
"hopitus" ...
On Apr 4, 11:54 am, hopitus > On Apr 4, 10:31 am,
"CatNipped" >

> > "hopitus" <hopi...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 112 lines]
> But *this* TED does what he/she does for one purpose ethically: to
> prolong pet lives.-

One further comment....this oncology vet needs a lesson in manners,
IMHO,
or perhaps he is just unaware ot the perceived cold atmosphere of no
waiting'
area, sitting prolonged periods in owners vehicles, complete non-411
on not
only what happening in there, but what to expect later on in the next
few days.
Let me explain something; radiation is radiation period and for
hoomins, not
the same dose of the big guns, as we call them, is used for every
patient....
the doc vet may have a therapy machine outmoded by the newer models,
which beam their dosage levels out just like my xray ER
machines....like a
ray (beam) of light. Older model machines used cobalt - a high-
radioactive
isotope controlled by user-operator opening of a little 'door'
permitting exposure
of patient to the isotope's radiation for a brief time (dose). These
older models
are still in use, still good, as cobalt has a very long half-life
(effectiveness level)
but unlike state-of-the-art models used today in hospitals on hoomins,
the
treatment dose is harder to control, because you are dealing with a
substance
not an electrically generated radiation source, instantly under
control by an
on/off switch. All this dose stuff is inspected and approved by a
radiation
therapy oncologist, a form of radiologist. Still talking hoomins here.
No matter how much $ this oncology vet makes from his practice, there
is no
way he could afford nor be approved by the Feds for a state-of-the-art
therapy
machine! If he has in fact an isotope-source older model - I'm sure
his patients
get a tiny fraction of what would have been used on any hoomin for any
disease -
I can't fault his precautions to the public .Manners, or P.R. is key
word here.

Thank you for that, hopitus, your info was very interesting, as I myself
have been in Er's alot in the years I had medical insurance and the hoomin
there were so nice to me and so were the x-ray techs.  I had to spend my
61st birthday in the ER with a clot in my knee, and a wonderful ER nurse
brought me a really cute singing bunny and a 'get well' mylar  balloon
(sorry to talk about the kneez again)
That was so sweet of her and they made me feel so comfortable and cared
about.
I admire your ability to work in an ER...it can be pretty intense in there,
I know.
Peace
Kyla
Joy - 04 Apr 2008 22:57 GMT
On Apr 4, 10:31 am, "CatNipped" <CatNip...@PossiblePlaces.com> wrote:
> "hopitus" <hopi...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 69 lines]
>
> CatNipped

Yes, I agree...lack of instruction/communication from vet facility to
pet owners is
what I fault, not their physical precautions. Joy, why don't you have
a talk with
the *vet* who actually owns the practice and explain that the secrecy
and
inconvenience are factors which make returning to his/her practice
less than
appealing to owners? His/her (vet) employees are NOT under the same
mandates
and educational requirements as I and all other licensed rad
techs....there are
NO rules for working on animals using any form of treatment except
maybe
cruelty statutes locally.
One problem with effectiveness of complaining; as you have no doubt
found out
radiation treatment facilities for animals are very few and far
between generally,
not like normal vet offices.....main reason is you can;t just buy
radiation equipment
(heavily regulated and restrictive by Fed. laws) and set up a shop
anywhere you
wish  It don't as they say take a rocket scientist to figure out
'WHY', LOL. We
are talking ionizing (google that) gamma radiation after all. So this
therapy vet
has NO federal mandates except to do what got everybody going....keep
hoomins
OUT of range of any scatter from his therapy-power machinery in there.
After all,
he is NOT working and/or treating hoomins. AFAIC being who I am
profession-wise,
your valid complaint 100% is the lack of compassion, instruction, and
even some
sort of written preparation for the experience. No ordinary vet visit
to TED indeed.
But *this* TED does what he/she does for one purpose ethically: to
prolong pet lives.

***

Today I spoke to the veterinary oncologist who referred me there.  This is a
radiation facility for humans, which they keep open after hours to treat
animals.  He said they don't let people in the building because they sit in
the waiting room with their pets and leave hair and fleas, which makes the
human patients complain.  I'm still not totally happy with the way I'm
treated, but as long as Nanki-Poo is getting the treatments he needs, I'll
go along with it.  I did urge him, rather strongly, to include an
explanation of what to expect with the handout that describes the process
and gives the address, and he said that was a good idea.  I just hope he'll
follow through on that.  I wasn't the only person there yesterday who was
confused, and the man who told me which door it was had the same problem on
his first visit.

Joy
Takayuki - 04 Apr 2008 23:53 GMT
>Today I spoke to the veterinary oncologist who referred me there.  This is a
>radiation facility for humans, which they keep open after hours to treat
>animals.

I guess that at least if they happen to switch to chemotherapy that
you'll be able to go to a more normal clinic.  The two veterinary
oncology centers I know of in my area have radiation machines
dedicated to animals, but I imagine if you take a kitty to a hoomin
oncology center like you did that they would have even more
sophisticated equipment.
hopitus - 05 Apr 2008 00:18 GMT
> >Today I spoke to the veterinary oncologist who referred me there.  This is a
> >radiation facility for humans, which they keep open after hours to treat
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> oncology center like you did that they would have even more
> sophisticated equipment.

Glad to see you back Tak. Right you are re the equipment, yeah.
Problem is unlike chemo the 'big guns'' or hoomin therapy machinery
is harder to tame down to what would be a pet treatment dose (I can
only theorize they use the similar dose of a small infant - during all
the
years I took xrays of many friends' pets...most memorable a ferret
of which I was terrified - and that is how I'd calculate the xrays
needed
to get a good film. OTOH I was not treating anyone or anything, only
filming for diagnosis, so have no clue how treatment doses are arrived
at. It would kinda be like dumbing down an aircraft artillery weapon
(seen frequently in WW2 old movies) - the ack-ack thing they point up
at the planes - to the equivalency of a 22c revolver.....sophisticated
is
not always 'better' as here.
Joy - 05 Apr 2008 06:46 GMT
>>Today I spoke to the veterinary oncologist who referred me there.  This is
>>a
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> oncology center like you did that they would have even more
> sophisticated equipment.

Yes, I would imagine so.

Joy
Marina - 05 Apr 2008 04:00 GMT
> I can understand the need for a secure/protected area because radiation is
> dangerous.  But is it impossible for them to have a safe waiting area?  It
> would also be nice if they had a tech explain what's going on - or at the
> very least a brochure detailing the procedure.  

Or even a sign on the back door, explaining the procedure.

Signature

Marina, Miranda and Caliban. In loving memory of Frank and Nikki.

Joy - 04 Apr 2008 18:51 GMT
I'll make this fairly short including purrs for Nanki. I am retired
nationally-licensed radiology tech
and what your cat is having is called radiation therapy; it takes an
additional year of study and a
very tough license exam, but such as I are licensed and able to
*assist* in this practice, but not
unsupervised.....which I did when working in facilities having a rad
therapy section of radiology.
All the above re hoomin patients.
Now: I never worked on animals but there is nothing mysterious and
nothing to be worried nor
indignant about....except maybe lack of explanation from employees you
dealt with. Forget the
other pet owners....they don't know any more than you do therefore
can't be blamed for lack of
411 to you. Rad therapy rooms in hospitals have doors that cannot be
opened except by special
switches only personnel know locations of. If a non-patient (or in
your case, pet owner) managed
to get into the therapy room you would get a blast of ionizing
radiation from the machine, which
once calculated and set up, runs automatically, circulating in a 360o
orbit around purple-pen marked
bullseye tumor or whatever on restrained patient. This is hoomins I am
talking. The tech is outside
the treatment room, watching through radiation proof window the whole
time.
A sad word of heads-up to Joy: Nanki may lose fur bigtime, just like
those breast cancer women
you see bald from having this same thing - radiation and/or
chemo...did you think breast cancer
made them bald? Uh uh. Hope Nanki doesn't lose fur but just warning in
case he does it is a
side effect of radiation.
This as I said is the short version. Glad to be of help. Therapy techs
in my former work are among
the highest regarded of all types. I was a simple hard working ER
trauma tech. There is NO way
I wanted to do therapy, I only assisted now and then, setting up
patients or doing a smaller machine
called "ortho" unit which treated keloids (scars) and skin
cancers....not the big guns mentioned
above. As I stated before, I don't do death well. Rad therapy is
*treatment* radiation, not the
diagnostic kind I used for 30 years.
Summation: I don't really know but suspect the locked doors and
"escort" vet personnel were simply
trying to do what we all in rad tech employment do: keep non-patients
out of radiation area.

***

Thank you, Hopitus.  I never expected to be allowed into a treatment room.
However, I have taken numerous human patients for radiation therapy, and
have always been allowed into the building, to wait in the waiting room, and
to use the rest room.  I have never been made to wait out in the parking lot
for over an hour, with no idea what is going on and no way to find out.

I knew chemo often cause loss of hair.  I didn't know radiation did.  It
didn't have that effect on my husband.  Thanks for warning me.  Now I won't
worry if he starts losing hair.

Joy
tanadashoes - 04 Apr 2008 23:09 GMT
A sad word of heads-up to Joy: Nanki may lose fur bigtime, just like
those breast cancer women
you see bald from having this same thing - radiation and/or
chemo...did you think breast cancer
made them bald? Uh uh. Hope Nanki doesn't lose fur but just warning in
case he does it is a
side effect of radiation.

===============================

People told me that Rob would lose hair due to the chemo he'd be on.  His
oncologist laughed and asked Rob how he felt about wearing a wig after
radiation.  By the time Rob was done with his 28 or so radiation treatments,
I'd gotten good at unplugging the shower with a piece of wire and he'd lost
the first half of his hair.  There was hair in a band from ear to ear  back
to his neck and none from the ear forward.  Later he got some hair back but
it was a little different in color from the original and the texture wasn't
the same.  Now I tease  him about his horseshoe Mohawk.  I'd rather have a
bald Rob than no Rob.  I suspect that Joy would agree with me regarding
Nanki Poo and hair loss.  Nanki's buddies may look at him like he's Nuclear
Nanki though.

Pam S. married to Nuclear Rob
Joy - 04 Apr 2008 23:14 GMT
> A sad word of heads-up to Joy: Nanki may lose fur bigtime, just like
> those breast cancer women
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Pam S. married to Nuclear Rob

Absolutely.  If he loses his hair, it may bother him but it won't bother me.
I'm glad we're having relatively warm weather, though.

Joy
hopitus - 04 Apr 2008 23:33 GMT
> > A sad word of heads-up to Joy: Nanki may lose fur bigtime, just like
> > those breast cancer women
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Sorry, Joy, our Pam has sense of humor similar to mine...Nuclear
Nanki?
I remembered something Pam knows about personally while I was outside
dealing with what the wool moths did to my relatives' fancy
pillows.....oftimes
another side effect could be nausea and lack of appetite but unlike
the hair
loss that usually goes away before too long.
My only comfort about these d*** wool moths is relatives say they eat
only
wool and my cats would happily play with and eat any if my place were
infested with them.
Glad you talked to the oncologist. What an eye-opener re the hoomin
facility
treating animals after hours. Commendable but odd...but as I already
stated,
not just anyone can even get approved to get therapy machines, and
another
factor is their prohibitive cost. Friends in the business and I have
howled in
movies where xrays not only are displayed upside down, but did you
realize
that due to publc ignorance and directors' wishes to have medical
equipment
look big and scary frightening, many scenes filmed in so called
hospitals are
filmed in xray therapy treatment rooms because the gantry (that's what
the
big thing that rotates around the table is called) looks so scary,
high-tech,
and science-fictiony (is that an adjective?).......my best to Nanki.
tanadashoes - 04 Apr 2008 23:53 GMT
Sorry, Joy, our Pam has sense of humor similar to mine...Nuclear
Nanki?
I remembered something Pam knows about personally while I was outside
dealing with what the wool moths did to my relatives' fancy
pillows.....oftimes
another side effect could be nausea and lack of appetite but unlike
the hair
loss that usually goes away before too long.

\===================

I got a radiation tek all kinds of upset by asking what color Rob's head
would glow at night.  He rather huffily informed me that Rob's head wouldn't
glow at night or any time.  I asked him what good the treatment was, then.

I'd forgot about the potential for nausea and appetite loss.  Rob went
through a couple of days of each if I remember correctly.  He's maxed  his
time on the table and won't be eligible for any more treatments, or so they
tell me.  Chemo is still an option.  I was under the impression that all
chemo was given IV.  Imagine my astonishment and depression when Rob was
handed a prescription for pills.  Admittedly, the pills cost $1000 each and
Rob had to take 2.5 a day, for five days a month.  I informed the dr that
Rob was eating the equivalent of a new car every month.  The oncologist has
my kind of humor.  He told me that at least Rob won't have to pick bumpers
out of his teeth.

Pam S.
Joy - 05 Apr 2008 03:51 GMT
> Sorry, Joy, our Pam has sense of humor similar to mine...Nuclear
> Nanki?
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> Pam S.

My late father was on chemo for his prostate cancer for a while.  It came in
the form of birth control pills.

Joy
tanadashoes - 05 Apr 2008 07:03 GMT
> My late father was on chemo for his prostate cancer for a while.  It came
> in the form of birth control pills.

At least he didn't get pregnant.

Pam S.
Joy - 05 Apr 2008 07:15 GMT
>> My late father was on chemo for his prostate cancer for a while.  It came
>> in the form of birth control pills.
>
> At least he didn't get pregnant.
>
> Pam S.

LOL!  He did get boobs, though.

Joy
tanadashoes - 05 Apr 2008 07:30 GMT
>>> My late father was on chemo for his prostate cancer for a while.  It
>>> came in the form of birth control pills.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> LOL!  He did get boobs, though.

I'm nosey, what cup size did he become?

Pam S.
Joy - 05 Apr 2008 08:00 GMT
>>>> My late father was on chemo for his prostate cancer for a while.  It
>>>> came in the form of birth control pills.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Pam S.

LOL!  I don't think he was ever more than an A, if there is such a thing,
but he was very self-conscious about it.

Joy
tanadashoes - 05 Apr 2008 21:37 GMT
>>>>> My late father was on chemo for his prostate cancer for a while.  It
>>>>> came in the form of birth control pills.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> LOL!  I don't think he was ever more than an A, if there is such a thing,
> but he was very self-conscious about it.

If he didn't get a B cup or better, then there was  nothing to worry about.
I've seen guys with man boobs that should have had a C cup on them.

Pam S.
bastXXXette@sonic.net - 05 Apr 2008 07:22 GMT
> I got a radiation tek all kinds of upset by asking what color Rob's head
> would glow at night.  He rather huffily informed me that Rob's head wouldn't
> glow at night or any time.  I asked him what good the treatment was, then.

I love that kind of humor. It can certainly help you get through what
is otherwise a horror show.

I used to live with someone who had uncontrolled seizures. She had that
same kind of humor and made many jokes about her "electric brain". I'm
lucky <knock wood - at least I *think* my desk has some wood in it> that
I haven't had an illness that severe. But if I ever do, I hope I can take
it on with one-tenth that amount of humor.

Signature

Joyce

To email me, remove the triple-X from my user name.  ^..^

Joy - 05 Apr 2008 07:59 GMT
> > I got a radiation tek all kinds of upset by asking what color Rob's head
> > would glow at night.  He rather huffily informed me that Rob's head
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> I haven't had an illness that severe. But if I ever do, I hope I can take
> it on with one-tenth that amount of humor.

Yes, humor can be a life-saver in tough situations.  It can also sometimes
make people look at you strangely.  ;-)

Joy
tanadashoes - 05 Apr 2008 21:40 GMT
> Yes, humor can be a life-saver in tough situations.  It can also sometimes
> make people look at you strangely.  ;-)

Sometimes if you don't laugh you'll cry to death.  If I ever stop joking
about Rob's situation, he'll know that I am too worried about him.  He still
wears the red plaid PJs that I bought him when he was in hospital last year.
He still doesn't see anything funny about them.

Pam S.  who thinks the red PJs are hysterical
Joy - 05 Apr 2008 03:50 GMT
Sorry, Joy, our Pam has sense of humor similar to mine...Nuclear
Nanki?
I remembered something Pam knows about personally while I was outside
dealing with what the wool moths did to my relatives' fancy
pillows.....oftimes
another side effect could be nausea and lack of appetite but unlike
the hair
loss that usually goes away before too long.
My only comfort about these d*** wool moths is relatives say they eat
only
wool and my cats would happily play with and eat any if my place were
infested with them.
Glad you talked to the oncologist. What an eye-opener re the hoomin
facility
treating animals after hours. Commendable but odd...but as I already
stated,
not just anyone can even get approved to get therapy machines, and
another
factor is their prohibitive cost. Friends in the business and I have
howled in
movies where xrays not only are displayed upside down, but did you
realize
that due to publc ignorance and directors' wishes to have medical
equipment
look big and scary frightening, many scenes filmed in so called
hospitals are
filmed in xray therapy treatment rooms because the gantry (that's what
the
big thing that rotates around the table is called) looks so scary,
high-tech,
and science-fictiony (is that an adjective?).......my best to Nanki.

***

Thanks, Hopitus.

The movie scenes with xray equipment remind me of the ones they used to do
when computers were big things.  They'd have all kinds of flashing lights on
the big computers, which, of course, was totally unrealistic, but made a
much better movie than if the things just sat there with the tape turning
around the rolls.  ;-)

Joy
Kreisleriana - 04 Apr 2008 17:27 GMT
> What an ordeal! I picked up the food in the morning, and blocked the door
> in the middle of the afternoon when I knew both cats were in. It wasn't
[quoted text clipped - 71 lines]
> hoping they kept him out longer because of the extra imaging they did, and
> after this it won't last so long.

What a to-do.  Poor little feller and poor you.  Purrs that the treatments
are effective, and also that the whole procedure gets a lot easier on both
of you.

Signature

Theresa, Stinky and Dante
drtmuirATearthlink.net

Stinky Pictures: http://community.webshots.com/album/125591586JWEFwh

Joy - 04 Apr 2008 18:53 GMT
> What a to-do.  Poor little feller and poor you.  Purrs that the treatments
> are effective, and also that the whole procedure gets a lot easier on both
> of you.

Thank you, Theresa.  At least I'll know what to expect in the future.

Joy
Matthew - 04 Apr 2008 18:54 GMT
still Purring and praying
> What an ordeal! I picked up the food in the morning, and blocked the door
> in the middle of the afternoon when I knew both cats were in. It wasn't
[quoted text clipped - 71 lines]
> hoping they kept him out longer because of the extra imaging they did, and
> after this it won't last so long.
Joy - 04 Apr 2008 22:50 GMT
Thank you, Matthew.

Signature

Joy

My mind is like a parachute...it functions only when open.

> still Purring and praying
>> What an ordeal! I picked up the food in the morning, and blocked the door
[quoted text clipped - 74 lines]
>> hoping they kept him out longer because of the extra imaging they did,
>> and after this it won't last so long.
Adrian - 04 Apr 2008 21:58 GMT
> What an ordeal!
<snip>

That must have been so frustrating, lots of purrs for you and Nanki-Poo.
Signature

Adrian (Owned by Snoopy & Bagheera)
Cats leave pawprints on your heart
http://community.webshots.com/user/clowderuk

tanadashoes - 04 Apr 2008 23:00 GMT
> What an ordeal! I picked up the food in the morning, and blocked the door
> in the middle of the afternoon when I knew both cats were in. It wasn't
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> office, and what it said at the top was the name of that business. Finally
> I found the real name, and saw where the business was.

I'm sorry it was so rough for the two of you.  Is this a human radiation
center that does animals after a certain time?  They might be secretive for
that reason.  There are a lot of humans who wouldn't like the idea of
animals being radiated on the same tables they have to lie on.  For what
it's worth, Rob's mom has to have her MRIs done at Washington State
University's Veterinarian school on the large animal MRI machine.  It's
either take the one hour drive to Pullman WA or drive two hours to Spokane
WA.  Her neurologist is in Pullman and just sends his patients to the
university.

Pam S.
Joy - 04 Apr 2008 23:05 GMT
>> What an ordeal! I picked up the food in the morning, and blocked the door
>> in the middle of the afternoon when I knew both cats were in. It wasn't
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> Pam S.

Yes, that's exactly the same situation.  I'm sure there are some people so
unenlightened that they feel that way.  The oncologist's explanation was
that if they let people into the waiting room with their pets they might get
hair or fleas in the waiting room, and the human patients would complain.

Joy
John A - 04 Apr 2008 23:08 GMT
> What an ordeal! I picked up the food in the morning, and blocked the door in
> the middle of the afternoon when I knew both cats were in. It wasn't too

What a thoroughly horrid experience, and what a way to run a business.
You must have been so anxious.
Purrs that despite the nasty experience the radiation therapy works for
poor Nanki-Poo.

John, servant to their Imperial Siamese Majesties Rhia and Amy.
Joy - 04 Apr 2008 23:27 GMT
>> What an ordeal! I picked up the food in the morning, and blocked the door
>> in
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> John, servant to their Imperial Siamese Majesties Rhia and Amy.

Thank you, John.

Joy
Joy - 05 Apr 2008 03:52 GMT
Today was much less stressful than yesterday. I still left much too early,
but his appointment was half an hour earlier, and they took him in right on
time. It was only about half an hour, and he isn't so groggy. They gave me a
tentative schedule for the next week, but said that is subject to change. I'm
tired, but not nearly as tired as I was yesterday. That's a good thing. I'd
like to be rested up for my contest tomorrow morning.

Joy
Marina - 05 Apr 2008 05:35 GMT
> Today was much less stressful than yesterday. I still left much too early,
> but his appointment was half an hour earlier, and they took him in right on
> time. It was only about half an hour, and he isn't so groggy. They gave me a
> tentative schedule for the next week, but said that is subject to change. I'm
> tired, but not nearly as tired as I was yesterday. That's a good thing. I'd
> like to be rested up for my contest tomorrow morning.

Glad it went so much better today. Good-luck purrs for your contest!

Signature

Marina, Miranda and Caliban. In loving memory of Frank and Nikki.

Joy - 05 Apr 2008 06:54 GMT
>> Today was much less stressful than yesterday. I still left much too
>> early, but his appointment was half an hour earlier, and they took him in
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Glad it went so much better today. Good-luck purrs for your contest!

Thank you, Marina.

Joy
Stormmee - 05 Apr 2008 06:18 GMT
that is good news, I hope you took something to eat with you, Lee
> Today was much less stressful than yesterday. I still left much too early,
> but his appointment was half an hour earlier, and they took him in right on
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Joy
tanadashoes - 05 Apr 2008 07:09 GMT
> Today was much less stressful than yesterday. I still left much too early,
> but his appointment was half an hour earlier, and they took him in right
> on time. It was only about half an hour, and he isn't so groggy. They gave
> me a tentative schedule for the next week, but said that is subject to
> change. I'm tired, but not nearly as tired as I was yesterday. That's a
> good thing. I'd like to be rested up for my contest tomorrow morning.

How many appointments in his course of radiation?  I think Rob had about 26
but none were on the weekend.  So it took about a month and a half to get
through the treatment cycle.  It gets to be boring after a while.  I always
took a good book as Rob's treatments lasted between a half hour and an hour
depending on what they needed to do.  They started out with this ghastly
mask made out of a combination of net and plaster of paris.  Radiation
points were marked on it so that they could target the correct area every
time.  Since there were two tumor locations, they had a grand old time
organizing his mask.  I was so grateful that he willingly tossed it a couple
of months after he got done.  The mask gave me the creeps.

Good luck on your contest.  What kind of contest is it?  Anyway we wish you
the best and please give Nanki Poo head scritches for us and love on the
other owners as well.

Pam S.
Joy - 05 Apr 2008 07:19 GMT
>> Today was much less stressful than yesterday. I still left much too
>> early, but his appointment was half an hour earlier, and they took him in
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> old time organizing his mask.  I was so grateful that he willingly tossed
> it a couple of months after he got done.  The mask gave me the creeps.

That does sound creepy!  Nanki-Poo is supposed to have 22 treatments, and
none of them are on weekends either.

> Good luck on your contest.  What kind of contest is it?  Anyway we wish
> you the best and please give Nanki Poo head scritches for us and love on
> the other owners as well.

Thank you.  It's a Toastmasters speech contest.  This particular one is Tall
Tales.  I've won at the club level and beat winners from other clubs at the
Area level so far.  This will be a Division contest, competing against other
Area winners.

Okay, I'll give head scritches to Nanki-Poo and to Lindy.

Joy
Kyla  =^. .^= - 05 Apr 2008 07:56 GMT
"Joy"
It's a Toastmasters speech contest.  This particular one is Tall
> Tales.  I've won at the club level and beat winners from other clubs at
> the Area level so far.  This will be a Division contest, competing against
> other Area winners.

Oh wow....that is so cool.  You'll do great.
Let us know
Purrs to Nanki-Poo and Mosey sends him a >nosepoink>
Hug
Kyla
Joy - 06 Apr 2008 01:36 GMT
> "Joy"
> It's a Toastmasters speech contest.  This particular one is Tall
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Hug
> Kyla

Thank you, Kyla.  I have mixed emotions about today's contest.  I spent a
total of $27. $20 of that was registration, and $7 was raffle tickets. I won
a $20 gift certificate to Target, so the whole thing only cost me $7. They
served a good breakfast (though not until almost 11:00). The contest was
fun, and I felt I was at my best. The audience responded well and I got
several compliments.  They gave trophies to the top three (out of 8
contestants).  I didn't place, and I have no idea why. The good part of that
is that I don't need any more trophies and I really can't afford to go to
District, which would be the next level of the contest and would cost over
$100.

Joy
Kyla =^. .^= - 06 Apr 2008 04:44 GMT
"Joy" <...
> "Kyla =^. .^="
>>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> Joy

Well sweetie, you did your best, had fun and had gudgud breakfast,
got a GC that you can go buy yourself something cute with:)
Cat toys?  LOL
So it wasn't a total waste of  a day...right?
Just curious, how many trophies do you have?
Hug
Kyla
<nosepoinks> from Mosey
Joy - 06 Apr 2008 06:51 GMT
> "Joy" <...
>> "Kyla =^. .^="
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
> Kyla
> <nosepoinks> from Mosey

Yes, I think I came out ahead today.

Honestly, I don't know how many trophies I have.  There are about 30 around
in various rooms, but I have put several away because I didn't have any
place to display them.

That sounds a lot more exciting than it really is.  I have been competing in
Toastmasters speech contests for about 15 or 16 years.  Twice a year there
are two contests.  One of my clubs gives trophies to its winners.  Most
clubs don't give them, but if you go higher (Area, Division or District) you
get one if you place high enough.  In most contests, trophies are given to
first and second place, and sometimes to third as well.   Sometimes there
are only two people competing, and first and second place trophies are still
given.

I generally compete in all three of my Toastmasters clubs, unless or until I
win in one.  Because of the locations of the clubs, there may be three
different contests going on at the same time, for different types of
speaking.

Joy
bastXXXette@sonic.net - 05 Apr 2008 07:30 GMT
> Today was much less stressful than yesterday. I still left much too early,
> but his appointment was half an hour earlier, and they took him in right on
> time. It was only about half an hour, and he isn't so groggy. They gave me a
> tentative schedule for the next week, but said that is subject to change. I'm
> tired, but not nearly as tired as I was yesterday. That's a good thing. I'd
> like to be rested up for my contest tomorrow morning.

That's good! Good luck tomorrow!

Signature

Joyce

To email me, remove the triple-X from my user name.  ^..^

Joy - 05 Apr 2008 08:00 GMT
> > Today was much less stressful than yesterday. I still left much too
> > early,
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> That's good! Good luck tomorrow!

Thank you, Joyce.

Joy
Takayuki - 04 Apr 2008 23:49 GMT
>When we got home, Nanki-Poo wanted to go out, but he was still groggy, so I
>didn't think that was a good idea. I shoed him the litter box, then started
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>longer because of the extra imaging they did, and after this it won't last
>so long.

Purrs for Nanki-Poo's treatments.  Poor boy.  I haven't been on the
newsgroup as much as I should the past couple of months, but I
certainly hope that I can follow your story to a happy and healthy
conclusion.

You've already seen this, but I refer people to Betty's story when
they have cats that are going to be undergoing treatment:

http://home.comcast.net/~takayuki9z/cancer.html
Karen AKA Kajikit - 05 Apr 2008 00:13 GMT
>What an ordeal! I picked up the food in the morning, and blocked the door in
>the middle of the afternoon when I knew both cats were in. It wasn't too
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>been for 5:45, but she hadn't found a way to get in. I told her what the man
>had said, and then used my keys to knock louder.

(snip)

>Finally, about 7:35, the man I'd talked to first brought Nanki out. He
>explained that they were treating him on both sides of the neck and had done
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>to eat out every day, so I think after this I'll take a sandwich to eat
>while I wait.

I'm sure they have to keep the owners out because of the radiation
risk in the building... so somebody doesn't sue them for 'exposure'...
But it seems really WEIRD that they don't have a reception/waiting
room outside the radiation zone to do a proper handover and for the
owners to wait! It sounds a bit bizarre...
Joy - 05 Apr 2008 06:47 GMT
>>What an ordeal! I picked up the food in the morning, and blocked the door
>>in
[quoted text clipped - 55 lines]
> room outside the radiation zone to do a proper handover and for the
> owners to wait! It sounds a bit bizarre...

The do have such an area, but since the facility is mainly for humans, they
don't want people taking their animals in there.

Joy
Susan M - 05 Apr 2008 02:26 GMT
> What an ordeal! I picked up the food in the morning, and blocked the door in
> the middle of the afternoon when I knew both cats were in. It wasn't too
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> was the name of that business. Finally I found the real name, and saw where
> the business was.

Purrs for you and Nanki-Poo for success with the treatment.  It is an
odd story for sure that they won't let you in - I'll be interested to
hear what they say about it when you ask!

Susan M
Otis and Chester
Joy - 05 Apr 2008 06:52 GMT
>> What an ordeal! I picked up the food in the morning, and blocked the door
>> in the middle of the afternoon when I knew both cats were in. It wasn't
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> Susan M
> Otis and Chester

Thank you, Susan.

I spoke to the veterinary oncologist who referred me there.  This is a
radiation facility for humans, which they keep open after hours to treat
animals.  He said they don't let people in the building because they sit in
the waiting room with their pets and leave hair and fleas, which makes the
human patients complain.  I'm still not totally happy with the way I'm
treated, but as long as Nanki-Poo is getting the treatments he needs, I'll
go along with it.  I did urge him, rather strongly, to include an
explanation of what to expect with the handout that describes the process
and gives the address, and he said that was a good idea.  I just hope he'll
follow through on that.  I wasn't the only person there yesterday who was
confused, and the man who told me which door it was had the same problem on
his first visit.

Today was much less stressful than yesterday. I still left much too early,
but his appointment was half an hour earlier, and they took him in right on
time. It was only about half an hour, and he isn't so groggy. They gave me a
tentative schedule for the next week, but said that is subject to change.
I'm
tired, but not nearly as tired as I was yesterday. That's a good thing. I'd
like to be rested up for my contest tomorrow morning.

Joy
Susan M - 07 Apr 2008 17:14 GMT
 > Thank you, Susan.

> I spoke to the veterinary oncologist who referred me there.  This is a
> radiation facility for humans, which they keep open after hours to treat
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> tired, but not nearly as tired as I was yesterday. That's a good thing. I'd
> like to be rested up for my contest tomorrow morning.

Glad you got the explanation, though it would be nice to wait inside
once they take him from you!  And good idea to suggest a description of
the process - the mind boggles that people don't think of these things.

Continued purrs for you and Nanki-Poo.

Susan M
Otis and Chester
Joy - 07 Apr 2008 19:43 GMT
>  > Thank you, Susan.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
> Susan M
> Otis and Chester

Thank you, Susan.

Joy
Sam - 06 Apr 2008 03:40 GMT
Purrs and prayers continuing for you both.  From your description it did
sound kind of fishy about the "go around to the back and knock" bit.

Sam, supervised by Mistletoe
Jo Firey - 06 Apr 2008 05:30 GMT
> Purrs and prayers continuing for you both.  From your description it did
> sound kind of fishy about the "go around to the back and knock" bit.
>
> Sam, supervised by Mistletoe

I have to wonder if they are why they are so secretive about this.  I can
imagine a place that does radiation treatments on pets that have cancer
could attract a lot of crazies.

But being left in the parking lot and not even seeing the place when you are
spending such a huge amount of money there and trusting them with your kid.

What sort of equipment do they have to use, and how is it regulated I
wonder.

Jo
bastXXXette@sonic.net - 06 Apr 2008 23:49 GMT
> I have to wonder if they are why they are so secretive about this.  I can
> imagine a place that does radiation treatments on pets that have cancer
> could attract a lot of crazies.

What sort of crazies? Not sure I'm following you here.

Signature

Joyce

To email me, remove the triple-X from my user name.  ^..^

Jo Firey - 07 Apr 2008 01:26 GMT
> > I have to wonder if they are why they are so secretive about this.  I
> > can
> > imagine a place that does radiation treatments on pets that have cancer
> > could attract a lot of crazies.
>
> What sort of crazies? Not sure I'm following you here.

Well, first you have the animal rights nuts who would object to the pets
being subjected to radiation treatment.

Then you have their polar opposite who would object just as violently to
radiation treatment being provided to pets when there are humans who can't
afford it.

And then the percentage  of patients who would be offended to find that
animals were being treated the same place they were being treated.

Finally, I suspect their might be licensing problems with a place providing
care to humans as well as animals.

Hey I never said they were rational.

Jo
bastXXXette@sonic.net - 07 Apr 2008 01:38 GMT
> <bastXXXette@sonic.net> wrote in message

>> What sort of crazies? Not sure I'm following you here.

> Well, first you have the animal rights nuts who would object to the pets
> being subjected to radiation treatment.

> Then you have their polar opposite who would object just as violently to
> radiation treatment being provided to pets when there are humans who can't
> afford it.

> And then the percentage  of patients who would be offended to find that
> animals were being treated the same place they were being treated.

> Finally, I suspect their might be licensing problems with a place providing
> care to humans as well as animals.

> Hey I never said they were rational.

OK, thanks - I just wasn't sure what sort of crazy person would want
to make trouble at an oncology center. But you've provided plenty
of examples, here, so I get it now.

Signature

Joyce

To email me, remove the triple-X from my user name.  ^..^

hopitus - 07 Apr 2008 03:15 GMT
> > Purrs and prayers continuing for you both.  From your description it did
> > sound kind of fishy about the "go around to the back and knock" bit.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Jo

Please see my long boring posts in this thread re your last
sentence..regulated
by the Feds also states. I repeat this vet has a long way to go re
public relations
and apparently needs lessons in how secrecy leads to strange
conclusions on
the part of patients companions. Joy posted he told her the hoomin
patients would
not go for the after-hours pet facility if they saw/were made aware of
it....
Joy - 06 Apr 2008 06:41 GMT
> Purrs and prayers continuing for you both.  From your description it did
> sound kind of fishy about the "go around to the back and knock" bit.
>
> Sam, supervised by Mistletoe

Thank you, Sam.  Apparently the reason is that this a facility for humans.
I suspect some people might be grossed out to think animals were being
treated at the same place, so they want to keep it quiet.  Personally, I'd
count it a point in their favor, but it takes all kinds.

Joy
Lesley - 06 Apr 2008 17:03 GMT
> Thank you, Sam.  Apparently the reason is that this a facility for humans.
> I suspect some people might be grossed out to think animals were being
> treated at the same place, so they want to keep it quiet.  Personally, I'd
> count it a point in their favor, but it takes all kinds.

Wouldn't bother me at all if I had to have therapy before or after an
animal- don;t people realise they wipe the couch down between uses?

Lesley

Slave of the Fabulous Furballs
tanadashoes - 06 Apr 2008 17:47 GMT
On Apr 5, 10:43 pm, "Joy" <toas...@real-me.net> wrote:

> Thank you, Sam. Apparently the reason is that this a facility for humans.
> I suspect some people might be grossed out to think animals were being
> treated at the same place, so they want to keep it quiet. Personally, I'd
> count it a point in their favor, but it takes all kinds.

Wouldn't bother me at all if I had to have therapy before or after an
animal- don;t people realise they wipe the couch down between uses?

=============

Yes, but not only are you an animalphiile, but you have common sense.  You'd
be surprised by how many people think that if an animal has gone near an
item, it is permanently contaminated.  There is also the allergen factor.  I
have met a few people who are honestly allergic to cats.  I met one who
talked with me for a little while and then said "excuse me, but do you own
cats by any chance?"  His eyes were already swelling and tearing up before
he asked.  I apologized and moved farther away from him.  I was wearing
clean clothing, had taken a shower and washed my hair before going to the
event, so I'm sure I wasn't carrying excess cat dander.

Pam S.
bastXXXette@sonic.net - 06 Apr 2008 23:49 GMT
>> Thank you, Sam. ?Apparently the reason is that this a facility for humans.
>> I suspect some people might be grossed out to think animals were being
>> treated at the same place, so they want to keep it quiet. ?Personally, I'd
>> count it a point in their favor, but it takes all kinds.

> Wouldn't bother me at all if I had to have therapy before or after an
> animal- don;t people realise they wipe the couch down between uses?

I'd rather share the table with an animal than with some humans...

Signature

Joyce

To email me, remove the triple-X from my user name.  ^..^

hopitus - 07 Apr 2008 03:16 GMT
On Apr 6, 4:49 pm, bastXXXe...@sonic.net wrote:

>  > On Apr 5, 10:43?pm, "Joy" <toas...@real-me.net> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> --
> Joyce

Thank you....so would I, LOL.
Joy - 07 Apr 2008 06:52 GMT
On Apr 6, 4:49 pm, bastXXXe...@sonic.net wrote:
> Lesley <LMadi...@hhnt.nhs.uk> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> --
> Joyce

Thank you....so would I, LOL.

***

And so would I.

Joy
Billy Colburn - 07 Apr 2008 05:08 GMT
bastXXXette@sonic.net <bastXXXette@sonic.net> wrote in message:
47f9538e$0$36380$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net,

>>> Thank you, Sam. ?Apparently the reason is that this a facility for
>>> humans. I suspect some people might be grossed out to think animals
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> I'd rather share