Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / Cat Anecdotes / January 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

I Question Something about Best Friends... need to ask our Aussie friends

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
jmcquown - 23 Jan 2008 21:25 GMT
I read an article in 'Best Friends' magazine (the cat rescue organization in
the U.S., with whom I've sponsored two animals) about how people in
Australia generally consider cats as nuisances, not good pets and "not
friendly".

Knowing we have a number of cat-loving Australians here in rpca, I really
have to question what I was reading.  Is it true the shelters (and the
government in general) doesn't believe in shelters neutering/spaying or
spay/neuter programs vs. euthanizing cats?

Not criticizing what 'Best Friends' said, but they stated that when
Australia was being colonized the cats were accepted as rat catchers on
ships that brought people (many British convicts) over the cats were
accepted.  But once the cats were turned loose at the docks of Sydney they
started killing local wildlife.  And they didn't mention birds, no, not at
all.  They (via someone in Australian authority) mentioned they were killing
wallabees and koala bears.

I may be incredibly ignorant, but I fail to see how a "domestic" sized cat
could kill a wallaby.  Or even a koala bear, which may appear to be gentle
but which have very large sharp claws.  They aren't cuddly bears.

Are they publishing the truth or is it just so much guff to try to stir
people up because cats need to get more recognition as pets in Australia?

Jill
Yowie - 23 Jan 2008 21:58 GMT
>I read an article in 'Best Friends' magazine (the cat rescue organization
>in
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> could kill a wallaby.  Or even a koala bear, which may appear to be gentle
> but which have very large sharp claws.  They aren't cuddly bears.

But are generally slow and dopey, with woeful eyesight. A cat would have no
trouble sneaking up on one. Perhaps the cat wouldn't kill an adult directly,
but the adult koala would sustain injuries that would lead to its death. The
cat would easily kill a baby or juvenile koala - and what would happen to a
baby koala if its mother was injured or killed by a cat? It would die too.
Ditto with wallabies (the smallest wallaby, btw, is the size of a mouse)

> Are they publishing the truth or is it just so much guff to try to stir
> people up because cats need to get more recognition as pets in Australia?

Its probably a little of both.

There is no native equivalent of the domestic cat in Australia. Domestic
cats eveolved in a far more competitave ecology, one that was filled with
relatively small, fast moving, prolifically breeding prey with an
insitinctual reaction to a cat - run and hide!

The same cannot be said for our native fauna. Similarly sized native fauna,
and the young of larger fauna are in comparison, slow, stupid, have no idea
what to do in the face of a cat, and don't breen prolifically - maybe only
one or two youung per year as opposed to the 'millions' such things as
rabbits and mice make. Whilst the cats introduced into Australia were
origianlly to keep the rat & mouse population down (which were also
intorduced to Australia) the cats - not being stupid - quickly found easier
prey to catch. Native mice, native marsupials (we don't have native mammals
bar the dingo), and of course, young koalas, young wallabies etc etc (and
koalas and some wallabies really aren't that big - size of a hare or
thereabouts). Cats catch native birds, too, but the ground animals are much
easier prey than birds (which by and large are quite smart compared to the
marsupials)

We also don't have anythign that would prey on the domestic cat.

So we have a huge problem.

Not only that, the cats out there in the bush are generally not 'domestic',
they've gone generationally feral. Through natural selection, Australia has
two type sof 'domestic' cat - the house cat, and the 'bush' cat. The hosue
cat is still the same size and temperament of house cats around the world,
the 'bush' cat is significantly bigger, smarter and far far meaner. The
'bush' cat could not be re-domesticated much like a bobtail could not be
domesticated, they are *wild*.

The problem here in Australia with catch, neuter, release is twofold. First,
we're a big country with sod all population for the most part. You'd have to
pay someone to drive a day to go inland to the scrubland, set traps, stay
overnight somwhere that doens't have accomodation, then drive a day back.
After a week, you'd have to do the same thing to collect the cats that were
trapped. You'd have to have a small army doing this to make any difference
at all, and no-one has the funding for that.

Teh other problem is that even a neutered 'bush' cat can continue to
decimate the native fauna for many years to come, and continue to pass
disease onto the animals (domesticated and otherwise) it meets, even if its
not making more bush cats.

The bush cats need an eradication program, and no eradication program is
'pretty'. Please do not think of these 'bush' cats as potential pets - they
aren't. They are like bob cats or small lynxes that have had a population
explosion.

But Australians also need to change their attitude towards domestic house
cats, and they slowly are. Now both cats & dogs are required to be registed
by most councils (county areas). And its alot more expensive to register an
unneutered animal. Australians also need to know the impact even their
little neutered housecat can have on the native wildlife in suburbia, and
think very long and hard about letting said cat out between dusk & dawn,
when most cats do their hunting.

New Zealand, for the same reasons of unique ecology, has a similar problem.
The domestic cat has directly caused the extinction of a bird that laid its
nest on the beach. The kiwi - a flightless bird - is under threat. The story
of the domestic cat in these two countries shows just how the 'circle of
life' is actually a delicate balance, once that can easily go disasterously
wrong when a species that did not evelve int hat circle is introduced. (The
cane toad is another disaster story, and is pretty much exactly the same as
the cat problem).

Yowie
bastXXXette@sonic.net - 23 Jan 2008 23:38 GMT
> There is no native equivalent of the domestic cat in Australia...

[snip lots of fascinating stuff]

> Not only that, the cats out there in the bush are generally not 'domestic',
> they've gone generationally feral. Through natural selection, Australia has
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> 'bush' cat could not be re-domesticated much like a bobtail could not be
> domesticated, they are *wild*.

Wow, are you saying that the bush cat has evolved from the original
domestic cat brought by ships to Australia, into a different species of
feline? I didn't know about this. Are they really a separate species?
Could the bush cat procreate with a house cat? (Not asking if anyone
would *want* this to happen, just wondering whether it's physically
possible.)

Joyce
Signature

To send email to this address, remove the triple-X from my user name.

Yowie - 24 Jan 2008 00:19 GMT
> > There is no native equivalent of the domestic cat in Australia...
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> would *want* this to happen, just wondering whether it's physically
> possible.)

No, not seperate species in that they can't interbreed, more like the
difference between wolves and domestic dogs. Are capable of breeding and
producing viable hybrids, but you would be unwise to take a wolf cub home
and expect it to grow up into the 'family dog'.

There are some that maintain that the Australian 'bush' cat is a seperate
'breed' again. I don't know.

Nor do I really know what to do about the problem. Its not as simple as
'catch, neuter, release', nor is it as simple as just 'cull all feral cats'.
The problem is actually *human beings*, the cats and the problems they cause
in Australia (and New Zealand) are merely a symptom.

Yowie
EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) - 24 Jan 2008 20:02 GMT
>  > There is no native equivalent of the domestic cat in Australia...
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> would *want* this to happen, just wondering whether it's physically
> possible.)

My guess would be "Yes, easily!"  Evidently the Australian
"bush" cats are simply the offspring of once domestic cats
that reverted to the wild, many generations ago - they are
probably still genetically "domestic" cats.  Apparently the
smaller "wildcat" species in America are genetically close
enough so they can interbreed with domestic cats - I've read
of cases where a bob-cat mated with a large domestic cat,
resuting in kittens.  (And domestic dogs can interbreed with
wolves - they aren't that far separate, genetically, "wild
animal" or not.)
bastXXXette@sonic.net - 24 Jan 2008 20:59 GMT
> My guess would be "Yes, easily!"  Evidently the Australian
> "bush" cats are simply the offspring of once domestic cats
> that reverted to the wild, many generations ago - they are
> probably still genetically "domestic" cats.  

> Apparently the
> smaller "wildcat" species in America are genetically close
> enough so they can interbreed with domestic cats - I've read
> of cases where a bob-cat mated with a large domestic cat,
> resuting in kittens.  

OK, but bobcats didn't *descend* from domestic cats. They were already
here when the domestic-cat-bearing Europeans arrived.

I think Yowie was saying that the bush cats of Australia *did* descend
from the domestic cats that the British brought over on their ships.
There were no felines on the continent prior to that.

My question was, have bush cats evolved into a different species of
feline? Yowie said no, so I'll accept that, since I know much less
about it than she does. Still, I find it interesting that bush cats
are *larger* than house cats. As far as I know, feral cats are the same
size as pet cats are in the US, so that's what led me to think that
the bush cats were evolving away from their origins. Well, perhaps
they are, but they still haven't gone far enough (yet) to be unable to
interbreed with a house cat. (*And* to produce fertile offspring -
that's the test of whether something is the same species. Many different
species can interbreed, but their offspring are sterile.)

Joyce
Signature

To send email to this address, remove the triple-X from my user name.

EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) - 24 Jan 2008 21:50 GMT
> My question was, have bush cats evolved into a different species of
> feline? Yowie said no, so I'll accept that, since I know much less
> about it than she does. Still, I find it interesting that bush cats
> are *larger* than house cats. As far as I know, feral cats are the same
> size as pet cats are in the US, so that's what led me to think that
> the bush cats were evolving away from their origins.

My guess would be only because, as totally "wild" creatures,
selective breeding entered the mix - size became a survival
"plus".  "Feral" cats in the rest of the world haven't been
that long separated from the domestic - or rather, their
ranks are constantly receiving fresh infusions of abandoned
domestic cats.

> Well, perhaps
> they are, but they still haven't gone far enough (yet) to be unable to
> interbreed with a house cat. (*And* to produce fertile offspring -
> that's the test of whether something is the same species. Many different
> species can interbreed, but their offspring are sterile.)

Donkeys and horses, for example.  (A "breeding pair" of
mules might simplify things considerably!) ;-)
Joy - 23 Jan 2008 23:54 GMT
>>I read an article in 'Best Friends' magazine (the cat rescue organization
>>in
[quoted text clipped - 104 lines]
>
> Yowie

From everything I've read and learned since I first became interested in
Australia, a very large number of the problems Australia has have been
caused by animals that were introduced by visitors and settlers. Australia
has such a fascinating, unique ecology that it is really sad to see it being
destroyed.

Joy
Yowie - 24 Jan 2008 00:31 GMT
Found a few articles ont he subject of hte Australian feral cat that appear
to be well researched and balanced.

http://www.messybeast.com/ausdilemma.htm
http://www.messybeast.com/auspredicament.htm

Yowie
Karen AKA Kajikit - 24 Jan 2008 02:44 GMT
>I read an article in 'Best Friends' magazine (the cat rescue organization in
>the U.S., with whom I've sponsored two animals) about how people in
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
>Jill

Sounds to me like somebody's an idiot. No way could a cat take down a
wallaby - a young joey maybe (they start out TINY and very dependant
on their mother)
The biggest problem with cats in Australia is them killing small
native birds - wrens, thrushes etc. Around Melbourne, cats have also
done a lot of damage to the lyrebird population (lyrebirds are very
large and beautiful birds but flightless and VERY slow and stupid...)
Feral cats are a big problem sadly... but as many Australians are
cat-lovers as in any other country!

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.