Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / Cat Anecdotes / November 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

PING Shiral

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 31 Oct 2007 08:13 GMT
Hey, everything OK down there in the South Bay? You're not that far from
East San Jose are you? Hope you didn't have any damage, hope your kitties
are OK.

We had a moderate earthquake (5.6) tonight in San Jose. I live 50 miles
from there, but Shiral is much closer. I was in a restaurant with a
friend, actually more like 25 miles from the epicenter, and I definitely
felt it. But because my friend kept looking impatiently toward the kitchen,
I thought she was shaking her leg in impatience. :) She thought I was
shaking my leg. :) Then we both realized that we were on a concrete floor,
and no amount of leg shaking would make the floor shake like that!

That's the report from California...

Joyce
Kreisleriana - 31 Oct 2007 14:39 GMT
> Hey, everything OK down there in the South Bay? You're not that far from
> East San Jose are you? Hope you didn't have any damage, hope your kitties
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Joyce

Whole lotta shakin' going on.  Glad to hear no bridges fell down.

I remember I was watching the World Series in 1989, the famous Bay series,
with the famous earthquake.   All of a sudden everything went sideways. Very
surreal experience.
jmcquown - 31 Oct 2007 17:27 GMT
>> Hey, everything OK down there in the South Bay? You're not that far
>> from East San Jose are you? Hope you didn't have any damage, hope
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> series, with the famous earthquake.   All of a sudden everything went
> sideways. Very surreal experience.

That was the Anaheim quake and it was a very bad one.  From what I
understand the one in northern CA wasn't bad; no reported injuries.  But we
know how the news can change by the minute.

Years ago I wrote an article for the newsletter for company I worked for
(then) about earthquake preparedness and what to do in the event of a bad
one.  I titled it "All Shook Up" (due to the Memphis connection).  A lot of
people who live in my area don't realize we're on the tail end of the 2nd
largest fault-line in the U.S.  I know I saved that newsletter but I'll be
darned if I can find it.  My file cabinet has grown sloppy over the years ;)

Jill
Kreisleriana - 31 Oct 2007 18:07 GMT
>>> Hey, everything OK down there in the South Bay? You're not that far
>>> from East San Jose are you? Hope you didn't have any damage, hope
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
>
> Jill

That's right, the New Madrid!  And I only know that because of Tim McCarver,
of all people.

Most people probably know McCarver as the chatty know-it-all ex-jock analyst
on Fox baseball broadcasts, but for around fourteen years, he was on the New
York Mets broadcast team, and he was wonderful.   I still basically like
McCarver, but the national stage has  kind of de-colored him, leaving only
the annoying bits.  Not only did he know a lot about baseball, and giuve
fascinating insights into the tactics of the game (and tell great stories
about Bob Gibson and Steve Carlton), but he had all kind of other nerdy
fascinations, too, and he would somehow work it into the game.  He was the
first person I ever heard talk about El Nino and La Nina.  And because he
was from Tennessee, when there was seismic activity in the Bay Area (like in
'89) he would remind everybody that the biggest quake in the contiguous US
states had happened in 1812, on the New Madrid fault.  The Mississippi River
changed directions!
jmcquown - 31 Oct 2007 18:32 GMT
>>>> Hey, everything OK down there in the South Bay? You're not that far
>>>> from East San Jose are you? Hope you didn't have any damage, hope
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
> That's right, the New Madrid!  And I only know that because of Tim
> McCarver, of all people.

Used to be a Tim McCarver Stadium in Memphis.  It was replaced by Autozone
Park.  How typical - move the team to some stadium named after a corporation
rather than a person.

> Most people probably know McCarver as the chatty know-it-all ex-jock
> analyst on Fox baseball broadcasts, but for around fourteen years, he
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> contiguous US states had happened in 1812, on the New Madrid fault.
> The Mississippi River changed directions!

Indeed it did - or so legend has it :)  That quake allegedly created
Reelfoot Lake, which is one of the few places where you can go on tours and
see bald eagles nesting in the wild.

Jill
Kreisleriana - 31 Oct 2007 18:53 GMT
>>>>> Hey, everything OK down there in the South Bay? You're not that far
>>>>> from East San Jose are you? Hope you didn't have any damage, hope
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
> corporation
> rather than a person.

Arrgh, I hate that, too.  It happens everywhere now.  The Mets' new stadium
will be Citi Field, after CitiBank.

McCarver used to talk often about his days playing for the Memphis Chicks.
I love minor league baseball team names. ;)
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 31 Oct 2007 18:56 GMT
>> I remember I was watching the World Series in 1989, the famous Bay
>> series, with the famous earthquake.   All of a sudden everything went
>> sideways. Very surreal experience.

> That was the Anaheim quake and it was a very bad one.  From what I
> understand the one in northern CA wasn't bad; no reported injuries.
> But we know how the news can change by the minute.

???

No, the 1989 quake that Theresa was referring to was in the San Francisco
(and also Santa Cruz) area, and it was huge - 7.1. *Lots* of damage,
many deaths. (Although miraculously, far fewer than one might think.
Fewer than 100 people died, in an area where millions of people live.)

Quite a few homes in San Francisco had big fires, many collapsed. One
bridge was out of commission, and a large section of freeway collapsed
on top of motorists during rush hour. In Santa Cruz, the entire downtown
area was wrecked and had to be rebuilt.

That year the World Series (a misnomer, since it involves only the US -
we're talking baseball here) was played between two Bay Area teams, and
the game was about to begin at the many-times-renamed Candlestick Park.
So there was a lot of media around, including cameras on helicopters and
a blimp. Because of that, the rest of us (I still lived in Massachusetts
at the time) got reports and images of the quake before people who lived
here knew exactly what had happened. Power was out, phone lines were
jammed, it was impossible to find out the real story if you were here.

I don't know about an Anaheim quake - was that recent? There was a big
one in LA in 1994, called the Northridge quake, that also did a lot of
damage.

Joyce
jmcquown - 31 Oct 2007 19:19 GMT
>  > Kreisleriana wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>
> Joyce

No, this was 1989.  Maybe Anaheim was the name of the freeway?  It's where
the bridge collapsed and yes there was massive damage and deaths.  I
"worked" with a woman who lived in San Francisco; I was in daily contact
with her to obtain reinsurance quotes for some our our local self-insured
clients.  After hearing about the quake I couldn't find out if she was okay
for over a week.  Her townhouse finally collapsed but she and her roommate
had managed to get out before it did.

Jill
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 31 Oct 2007 19:26 GMT
>> I don't know about an Anaheim quake - was that recent? There was a big
>> one in LA in 1994, called the Northridge quake, that also did a lot of
>> damage.

> No, this was 1989.  Maybe Anaheim was the name of the freeway?

No, the freeway that collapsed was known as the Nimitz Freeway, and
the particular area that collapsed was called the Cypress structure.

The quake itself is known as the Loma Prieta quake, because that's
the area where the epicenter was located.

I don't remember the name Anaheim being involved in any way. :) I'm
sure if there was a huge earthquake at Disneyland, we'd all know about
it! :)

Joyce
jmcquown - 31 Oct 2007 19:48 GMT
>  >> I don't know about an Anaheim quake - was that recent? There was
>  a big >> one in LA in 1994, called the Northridge quake, that also
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Joyce

LOL I'm sure you're right.  Some of the folks from other ng's who live in CA
have referred (not recently) to a big quake in 1989 in Anaheim.  What do I
know?  I haven't lived in CA since 1967!  I couldn't even tell you how to
get to Hollywood :)

Jill
Daniel Mahoney - 31 Oct 2007 19:54 GMT
> No, the freeway that collapsed was known as the Nimitz Freeway, and
> the particular area that collapsed was called the Cypress structure.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Joyce

I think the quake everyone is associating with Anaheim was the Whittier
Narrows quake of 1987. Anaheim is very close to Whittier Narrows.
Something like a magnitude 6, 8 or 9 deaths. I was living 10 or 15 miles
from the epicenter at that time :)

The other big quakes in CA were the Northridge quake in 94 (several dozen
fatalities) and the Landers quake in 92 (very few fatalities due to the
remoteness of the epicenter).

Dan
Shiral - 31 Oct 2007 20:37 GMT
> jXwXeXrXmXoX...@sonic.net wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 48 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

That was the Loma Prieta Quake, in 1989. The epicenter was near Santa
Cruz. It was much stronger than last night's quake. Actually it's
being the World's Series  in '89 with the A's and the Giants playing
each other probably saved the lives of some people who would otherwise
have been driving when the quake struck.

There was the Northridge Quake back in... 1994? or was it 2004?

Melissa
jofirey - 31 Oct 2007 19:30 GMT
>> Hey, everything OK down there in the South Bay? You're not that far from
>> East San Jose are you? Hope you didn't have any damage, hope your kitties
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> with the famous earthquake.   All of a sudden everything went sideways.
> Very surreal experience.

I had a class in Florida a few days later.  The instructor had been at the
ball game.  He was a wreck.

Jo
Shiral - 31 Oct 2007 20:34 GMT
On Oct 31, 12:13 am, jXwXeXrXmXoX...@sonic.net wrote:
> Hey, everything OK down there in the South Bay? You're not that far from
> East San Jose are you? Hope you didn't have any damage, hope your kitties
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Joyce

Hi all,

Melissa reporting in.  I definitely FELT the quake, and as always, it
was  an adrenaline jolt to the system. Luckily, that's ALL it seems to
have been. Fortunately, home and work are undamaged, and it was not a
very long quake. U.S.G.S gave it a 5.6 on the Richter scale. The
lights didn't even go out. =o) Of course, now they're also muttering
about the Hayward Fault, which is a more dangerous one. So it was a
Geological "hello" from the State of California. And a reminder that I
need to stock up on drinking water for my emergency kit.

I was at work when it struck, and as we have an upper storey on my
building (Machinery is stored there, but it's not an open area to the
staff or public. Every now and then, we'll hear the light fixtures
rattle, and that's what I thought the quake WAS, at first.  Then I
realized that no, it was an Earthquake, I could feel the building
shake.  But for right now, all is well.

Thanks for your concern!
Melissa
Marina - 01 Nov 2007 04:19 GMT
> Melissa reporting in.  

Glad to hear you're alright, Melissa! I can't imagine what it would be
like to live in earthquake land.

Signature

Marina, Miranda and Caliban. In loving memory of Frank and Nikki.

Shiral - 01 Nov 2007 20:23 GMT
> > Melissa reporting in.  
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> --
> Marina, Miranda and Caliban. In loving memory of Frank and Nikki.

Most of the time, it's a great if expensive place to live. Every now
and then though, it can give you the shakes. =o) But major
earthquakes, fortunately, come around less often than major
hurricanes.

Melissa
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 01 Nov 2007 20:29 GMT
> Most of the time, it's a great if expensive place to live. Every now
> and then though, it can give you the shakes. =o) But major
> earthquakes, fortunately, come around less often than major
> hurricanes.

At least with hurricanes, you get plenty of warning ahead of time.
Theoretically, that means that people can prepare for it... :-/

Joyce
Daniel Mahoney - 01 Nov 2007 20:35 GMT
> At least with hurricanes, you get plenty of warning ahead of time.
> Theoretically, that means that people can prepare for it... :-/
>
> Joyce

Theoretically.
Shiral - 01 Nov 2007 23:09 GMT
On Nov 1, 12:29 pm, jXwXeXrXmXoX...@sonic.net wrote:

>  > Most of the time, it's a great if expensive place to live. Every now
>  > and then though, it can give you the shakes. =o) But major
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Joyce

Yes, there is that element to hurricanes, whereas with Earthquakes
it's "Ready or not, here I come!"

Melissa
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.