Cat Forum / Cat Anecdotes / October 2007
I apologize profusely
|
|
Thread rating:  |
CatNipped - 26 Oct 2007 14:28 GMT I'm so sorry. I didn't mean to offend anyone living in the UK. Stormee just happened to hit one of my "hot buttons" and I tend to have a knee-jerk reaction to that (I really hate it when someone implies that the US is a bunch of ignorant savages - I guess my age is telling, I still have a lot of old-time patriotism and that's gone out of style now).
If you live in the UK, I hope you'll accept my abject apologies for any aspersions I made to your country. The odd thing is that I *am* an anglophile! I love everything about the UK (*especially* the "pretty accent" ;>).
You are all dear friends to me and I would be devastated to know that I've hurt your feelings in my lashing out blindly. I do hope you'll forgive me my temper tantrum.
 Signature Hugs,
CatNipped
See all my masters here: http://www.PossiblePlaces.com/CatNipped/
jmcquown - 26 Oct 2007 14:56 GMT > I'm so sorry. I didn't mean to offend anyone living in the UK. > Stormee just happened to hit one of my "hot buttons" (snip)
> You are all dear friends to me and I would be devastated to know that > I've hurt your feelings in my lashing out blindly. I do hope you'll > forgive me my temper tantrum. I missed what you said, Lori, but we all have days when our buttons are more easily pushed. I'm having to really try to hold back some knee-jerk reactions lately (not so much on rpca). I went off on a friend last night because she pushed the wrong button at the wrong time. I have to call to apologize but right now I'm just embarrassed. She didn't deserve it and I'm sure she has no idea what set me off. (sigh)
You're under a lot of stress, worrying about Archer and who knows what else in your life. I'm under a lot of stress worrying about my brother (who seems to be doing just fine, but still) and other things. I'm sure everyone here will understand, whatever it was. Keep your chin up!
Jill
CatNipped - 26 Oct 2007 15:06 GMT >> I'm so sorry. I didn't mean to offend anyone living in the UK. >> Stormee just happened to hit one of my "hot buttons" [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > Jill Thanks, Jill. Isn't it sad how we always lash out at the people closest to us just *because* they're close and "handy"? I am always embarrassed and ashamed when I do so, but often that's after the harm is already done. I can only hope that those I hurt are better people than me and can find it in their hearts to forgive.
Hugs,
CatNipped
jmcquown - 26 Oct 2007 16:29 GMT >>> I'm so sorry. I didn't mean to offend anyone living in the UK. >>> Stormee just happened to hit one of my "hot buttons" [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > > CatNipped It's sad but yes, they are close and handy. Who else are you going to lash out at (or reach out to) some stranger on the street? Someone at the grocery store? Someone at the bank? Your boss?
sh.t happens. We have moods, stresses, buttons that can be pushed.
Jill
CatNipped - 26 Oct 2007 16:35 GMT >>>> I'm so sorry. I didn't mean to offend anyone living in the UK. >>>> Stormee just happened to hit one of my "hot buttons" [quoted text clipped - 37 lines] > > sh.t happens. We have moods, stresses, buttons that can be pushed. Yep, and pretty much all you can do is apologize and offer to fogive in return when needed. My best friend and I have a "safe code" for when we're fighting - if either of us just really needs the other we'll call and say "peace at any price". At that time we both immediately put aside whatever it is we're arguing about and just "be there" for the other.
Hugs,
CatNipped
> Jill Stormmee - 26 Oct 2007 16:18 GMT I am reading today's posts and am making the decision as to stay or unsubscribe, it is readily apparent to me that you have confused factual discussion with blind patriotism, that for someone who seems to be as intelligent as you up to this point seemed to be to me is just plain sad, we cannot maintain a country and improve it if we do not critically and honestly examine both the wonderful freedoms and the hideous mistakes we can and do make as a country... as I said, if you don't see me for a bit I am either taking a break, have blocked some posters or have just left.. purrs to all of you who are kind, purrs and hugs to all who need them, Lee
> I'm so sorry. I didn't mean to offend anyone living in the UK. Stormee > just happened to hit one of my "hot buttons" and I tend to have a knee-jerk [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > See all my masters here: http://www.PossiblePlaces.com/CatNipped/ Kreisleriana - 26 Oct 2007 16:32 GMT >I am reading today's posts and am making the decision as to stay or > unsubscribe, it is readily apparent to me that you have confused factual [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > either taking a break, have blocked some posters or have just left.. purrs > to all of you who are kind, purrs and hugs to all who need them, Lee I would be sorry to see that you weren't able to accept an apology, especially from someone as warm hearted and well meaning as Lori. It really isn't the place here to discuss those things you mentioned, although they do come up from time to time, inevitably. It's just really not the place to judge people in that way, especially since here we know a lot about the troubles and pressures that many of us have to live with day-to-day.
Stormmee - 26 Oct 2007 16:54 GMT she never apologized to me just the UK posters, and animal cruelty is a pretty part of cats to me, thanks for your concern for Lori, it is heartwarming to see that you care for people on this group. life stresses and the support is why I started reading and posting to this group... life stress... this is way off topic but just so you understand that I get life stress:
1. last august both of my father's sister's died exactly one week apart. 2. two weeks after that a cousins six year old granddaughter died of a brain tumor. 3. my brother's cancer has returned. 4. my mom's sister is currently undergoing chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer and its not working. 5. my sister's school financing has gotten screwed up so she can't continue college, -6. my nephew is currently expecting his first child and something seems just not right. 7. and most recently this morning DH informed me that the furnace quit last night and if its not the $20.00 part that he thinks it is we have to buy a whole new furnace...
I am not wining here but the truth is I loved this group for its concern and support, and I also loved it because it dealt honestly and thoroughly with issues like animal cruelty, it breaks my heart that I seem to be mistaken, or that I have gotten sensitive enough that I can no longer enjoy that,
Lee
> >I am reading today's posts and am making the decision as to stay or > > unsubscribe, it is readily apparent to me that you have confused factual [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > judge people in that way, especially since here we know a lot about the > troubles and pressures that many of us have to live with day-to-day. jmcquown - 26 Oct 2007 17:11 GMT > she never apologized to me just the UK posters, and animal cruelty is > a pretty part of cats to me, thanks for your concern for Lori, it is [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > > Lee Again, I never saw whatever post you replied to in which she got upset and you were subsequently offended. But it certainly wasn't Lori's fault that you had all those incidents occur in your life one right after another. That's more than enough stress for one person. But we all have stress triggers.
I don't know if you went off about Americans. I didn't see the post. I do know I'd be upset, too, if you had.
Your leaving rpca isn't the answer. Taking a break, maybe; whatever works for you. We all have problems. We're all members of this thing called the human race. We also all love cats. Do whatever you need to do. But don't (and again I didn't see the post) come down on a nation for one thing or another. On his ng are all doing the best we can.
Jill
>>> I am reading today's posts and am making the decision as to stay or >>> unsubscribe, it is readily apparent to me that you have confused [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] >> especially since here we know a lot about the troubles and pressures >> that many of us have to live with day-to-day. Ginger-lyn - 27 Oct 2007 20:34 GMT > she never apologized to me just the UK posters, and animal cruelty is a > pretty part of cats to me, thanks for your concern for Lori, it is [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > > Lee I missed the thread that brought this about, so I am out of the loop. But {{{{Lee}}}}} I am so sorry you have gone through all of that. I hope you will reconsider and stay, or just take a break for awhile. You are valued here, too.
Ginger-lyn
 Signature Home Pages: http://www.spiritrealm.com/summer/ http://www.angelfire.com/folk/glsummer (homepage & cats) http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~summer/index.htm (genealogy) http://www.movieanimals.bravehost.com/ (The Violence Against Animals in Movies Website)
Stormmee - 30 Oct 2007 21:45 GMT thank you... on a positive note, the part was $6.00 and it worked, Lee
> > she never apologized to me just the UK posters, and animal cruelty is a > > pretty part of cats to me, thanks for your concern for Lori, it is [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] > http://www.movieanimals.bravehost.com/ (The Violence Against > Animals in Movies Website) jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 26 Oct 2007 18:58 GMT > >I am reading today's posts and am making the decision as to stay or > > unsubscribe, it is readily apparent to me that you have confused factual [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > either taking a break, have blocked some posters or have just left.. purrs > > to all of you who are kind, purrs and hugs to all who need them, Lee
> I would be sorry to see that you weren't able to accept an apology, > especially from someone as warm hearted and well meaning as Lori. It really > isn't the place here to discuss those things you mentioned, although they do > come up from time to time, inevitably. It's just really not the place to > judge people in that way, especially since here we know a lot about the > troubles and pressures that many of us have to live with day-to-day. And in any case, there's no reason for *you* (Lee) to leave just because someone else's views seem narrow or not very well thought out. Just block them. And if a thread that you don't like goes on and on, you can block that, too.
I'd hate to see you go just because of someone else's ignorance - or perceived ignorance. (I haven't read the thread in question, so I can't comment on the specifics. But I certainly agree with your idea that as a country, we should always be willing to view ourselves with honest criticism as well as with pride.)
Joyce
Stormmee - 26 Oct 2007 19:44 GMT thank you its over now, but I do appreciate your comments, Lee
> > "Stormmee" <rgrass@consolidated.net> wrote in message > > news:5oef4nFmg43dU1@mid.individual.net... [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > > Joyce CatNipped - 26 Oct 2007 16:39 GMT >I am reading today's posts and am making the decision as to stay or > unsubscribe, it is readily apparent to me that you have confused factual [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > either taking a break, have blocked some posters or have just left.. purrs > to all of you who are kind, purrs and hugs to all who need them, Lee Lee, I don't want to see you leave the group - that was not my aim in "defending" my country. I'm sorry if things got heated and you felt insulted, but you should realize that I also felt insulted by several of the comments you made about/to me.
For the sake of peace in this group, I am willing to put aside hard feelings and just ignore all previous posts. I hope you feel the same.
Hugs,
CatNipped
Stormmee - 26 Oct 2007 17:33 GMT works for me, Lee
> >I am reading today's posts and am making the decision as to stay or > > unsubscribe, it is readily apparent to me that you have confused factual [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > CatNipped CatNipped - 26 Oct 2007 18:02 GMT > works for me, Lee Thanks, then truce!
Hugs,
CatNipped
>> >I am reading today's posts and am making the decision as to stay or >> > unsubscribe, it is readily apparent to me that you have confused [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] >> >> CatNipped Yowie - 27 Oct 2007 00:19 GMT >> works for me, Lee > > Thanks, then truce! Thankyou *both* for behaving in a mature manner.
Sad fact of life is that our Real Life stresses can spill over into here, our 'safe haven'. But if we can recognise and then apologise for the hurt we have inadvertently caused (I can't imagine any regular here causing hurt intentionally) and also accept an apology with good grace, then we're doing something really special, really good, and can help each other have this 'safe haven' away from Real Life stresses.
So thankyou both for not carrying out a perpetual flame war and acting like grown ups. Good to see (although sadly rather unusual here in Usenet) and a *great* example to others.
Hugs & purrs
Yowie
Sherry - 26 Oct 2007 17:59 GMT > I am reading today's posts and am making the decision as to stay or > unsubscribe, it is readily apparent to me that you have confused factual [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Christina Websell - 26 Oct 2007 18:59 GMT > If you live in the UK, I hope you'll accept my abject apologies for any > aspersions I made to your country. The odd thing is that I *am* an > anglophile! I love everything about the UK (*especially* the "pretty > accent" ;>). I was amazed to see this post. I am so behind with reading the group, I had to search out the reason for it. I am pretty narked that you brought up the hung drawn and quartered thing as the USA as it is now didn't exist at that time for me to compare barbarities. If you don't mention killing native Americans to take their land, and slavery plantations, far more recent - then I won't. Most nations have done things in the past that they are ashamed of now. We should not use this sort of thing in an argument in a cat newsgroup.
There is nothing wrong with a heated debate if those concerned come out of it unscathed. Maybe ruffled feelings which will calm down in a day or two. That's OK, it happens sometimes on this group. We are a family on here, a big family. Big families fall out all the time, and fall back in again. We need each other. Sulk for a while and then forget it.
Tweed
> You are all dear friends to me and I would be devastated to know that I've > hurt your feelings in my lashing out blindly. I do hope you'll forgive me > my temper tantrum. jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 26 Oct 2007 19:15 GMT > There is nothing wrong with a heated debate if those concerned come out of > it unscathed. Maybe ruffled feelings which will calm down in a day or two. > That's OK, it happens sometimes on this group. > We are a family on here, a big family. Big families fall out all the time, > and fall back in again. We need each other. > Sulk for a while and then forget it. This is just about the most sensible thing I've heard on this topic!
Thank you for saying this.
Joyce
CatNipped - 26 Oct 2007 20:07 GMT >> If you live in the UK, I hope you'll accept my abject apologies for any >> aspersions I made to your country. The odd thing is that I *am* an [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > Tweed Again, it was a knee-jerk reaction - it irks me when Americans put down their own country (something that seems to be in fashion here now-a-days). But I was totally wrong to cast any aspersions on the UK in my defense of the US. I apologize for having made you "narked"(?) [in the US "narked" means gave information to the narcotics police about someone dealing in drugs - weird, huh?]
Hugs,
CatNipped
>> You are all dear friends to me and I would be devastated to know that >> I've hurt your feelings in my lashing out blindly. I do hope you'll >> forgive me my temper tantrum. Christina Websell - 26 Oct 2007 20:39 GMT I apologize for having made you "narked"(?)
It means annoyed here, colloquially (is that a word?) I know what I mean.
We should never bring up historical issues that we are all ashamed about to make a point here, Lori.
When I first got to know my German friend Nuele we decided to get the war out of the way fairly quickly so we discussed it ad infin. She felt ashamed of it although she was not born then.
Just think before you post. Occasionally I put a post in my drafts folder to prevent me from firing off. Mostly I just do :-)
Tweed
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 26 Oct 2007 20:59 GMT > When I first got to know my German friend Nuele we decided to get the war > out of the way fairly quickly so we discussed it ad infin. She felt ashamed > of it although she was not born then. Obviously, it's not anyone's fault what their ancestors did before they were born. But we can still take responsbility for it if we are direct decendents, or if we have benefitted from past atrocities. I don't think that taking responsibility means saying you are at fault, or that you should be punished, shunned, blamed, etc. But you can still work to make amends and to correct ongoing problems that exist because of past actions.
Often brutality can cause damage down the generations, and people whose ancestors were brutalized, enslaved, conquered and repressed, etc, may still be suffering aftereffects. So I feel it's possible to recognize that they might still be at some disadvantage because of the inherited damage. Those who inherited *benefits* are in a position to make some reparations, or at the very least, to give recognition to the people who are still struggling with the legacy.
I'm sure the decendants of WWII victims will be dealing with aftereffects for generations to come. Nuele doesn't need to feel personally ashamed, but that doesn't mean she's helpless to have a positive effect, either.
Joyce
Victor Martinez - 26 Oct 2007 21:10 GMT > were born. But we can still take responsbility for it if we are direct > decendents, or if we have benefitted from past atrocities. I don't think Hmmm... let's see, half of my ancestors came from Europe and enslaved and killed the other half of my ancestors. That means I'm both the victim and the perpetrator, in a way. Do I apologize to myself? ;-)
 Signature Victor M. Martinez Owned and operated by the Fantastic Seven (TM) Send your spam here: uce@ftc.gov Email me here: pistorLITTER@BOXaustin.rr.com
jofirey - 27 Oct 2007 00:18 GMT >> were born. But we can still take responsbility for it if we are direct >> decendents, or if we have benefitted from past atrocities. I don't think > > Hmmm... let's see, half of my ancestors came from Europe and enslaved and > killed the other half of my ancestors. That means I'm both the victim and > the perpetrator, in a way. Do I apologize to myself? ;-) You figure it out, let me know. I figure most of us have ancestors who got the short end of things at some point, as well as ancestors who may have got unfair advantage. Life isn't always fair, and it never was. I kind of figure the most you can really ask of anyone is that they live the best way they know how in this lifetime.
Jo
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 27 Oct 2007 02:32 GMT > "Victor Martinez" <me@nospam.com> wrote in message
>>> were born. But we can still take responsbility for it if we are direct >>> decendents, or if we have benefitted from past atrocities. I don't think
>> Hmmm... let's see, half of my ancestors came from Europe and enslaved and >> killed the other half of my ancestors. That means I'm both the victim and >> the perpetrator, in a way. Do I apologize to myself? ;-)
> You figure it out, let me know. Hey, why are you guys being so snide about this idea? I know lots of people who take it very seriously.
Maybe you shouldn't be taking it so literally. No, Victor, you don't "apologize" to yourself. But I've known mixed-race people, part white, who were ashamed of their non-white ancestry. So maybe they did need to do a little work to feel proud of that part of their family, their history, and themselves. It's not a news flash that people carry legacies from one generation to the next.
Maybe this doesn't apply to you, and if so, that's wonderful. But don't discount that it might be worthwhile to someone else.
> Life isn't always fair, and it never was. Um, no. "Life isn't fair" means that you can get sick, or have an accident, or be born with a disability, or lose your house in a tornado... or miss the bus, or stub your toe. Stuff happens, and it's nobody's fault. It happens to some people more than others, and it's not fair. But then, as we both agree, life isn't fair. The key word being LIFE. As in, the random events of life that we can't control.
It's not a blanket excuse for *people* doing bad things to each other. Imagine if someone did something terrible to you and then sneered, "Sorry babe, life's not fair, get over it". I think it's pretty callous to say to a victim of human brutality that "life isn't fair", as though they should just shut up and get over it. As though we should all just accept people *choosing* to do unacceptable things.
Joyce
Victor Martinez - 27 Oct 2007 04:58 GMT > "apologize" to yourself. But I've known mixed-race people, part > white, who were ashamed of their non-white ancestry. So maybe they > did need to do a little work to feel proud of that part of their family, > their history, and themselves. It's not a news flash that people carry I have a simpler philosophy. I am proud of what I have accomplished and I'm ashamed of what I've done wrong. What my ancestors did right or did wrong is not for me to feel proud of or ashamed of. That does not mean I cannot (or should not) point out episodes in history that are shameful for any of our ancestors. Those who do not learn from history are bound to repeat it. And often that is not a good thing.
Cheers.
Victor
 Signature Victor M. Martinez Owned and operated by the Fantastic Seven (TM) Send your spam here: uce@ftc.gov Email me here: pistorLITTER@BOXaustin.rr.com
Joy - 27 Oct 2007 06:53 GMT >> "apologize" to yourself. But I've known mixed-race people, part >> white, who were ashamed of their non-white ancestry. So maybe they [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Victor That's the way I feel about it too, Victor. Every people has horrendous acts in their past. But those who perpetrated those things aren't around to be chastised. We need to focus on making things better in the present and the future.
Joy
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 27 Oct 2007 09:14 GMT > Every people has horrendous acts in their past. But those who > perpetrated those things aren't around to be chastised. We need > to focus on making things better in the present and the future. That's true, and I think that part of that is righting situations that come from past wrongs. For example, we might have abolished slavery in this country, but we haven't abolished racism. There are still inequalities between the races. And since I, as a white person, benefit from a society that privileges whiteness, I do feel like I have an obligation to address it, somehow, to make a change for the better.
I'm not even being specific on exactly *what* I think I should do - I guess it's different things at different times, depending on what's called for, and what I can manage to do at any given time. In any case, it's certainly not for me to tell anyone else what they should do, or how much they should do. But at the same time, for those of us who do benefit from racism - and if you're white, then you do, even if you don't want to - it's important to recognize that we have this privilege and that we benefit from it.
I really don't think that's the same thing as saying that racism is my fault. I know I didn't create it. But I'm stuck with it, we all are, and if we don't change it, then who will? That's all I'm trying to say. It's not so outlandish, is it?
Joyce
Sherry - 27 Oct 2007 14:44 GMT On Oct 27, 3:14 am, jXwXeXrXmXoX...@sonic.net wrote:
> > Every people has horrendous acts in their past. But those who > > perpetrated those things aren't around to be chastised. We need [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > > Joyce Nah, I get what you're trying to say. I think you have a really strong social conscience, and that's a good thing. It means your a nice person and take responsibility for things you're not directly to blame for. You have a lot of empathy for people. (heh. this is starting to sound like your horoscope) And yeah, I think too it's important in the sense that we learn from the ugliest parts of our history. Off your original topic, but what I see around here is the new racism--the attitudes toward Americans with Middle-Eastern heritage. Sherry
Yowie - 27 Oct 2007 00:21 GMT >> were born. But we can still take responsbility for it if we are direct >> decendents, or if we have benefitted from past atrocities. I don't think > > Hmmm... let's see, half of my ancestors came from Europe and enslaved and > killed the other half of my ancestors. That means I'm both the victim and > the perpetrator, in a way. Do I apologize to myself? ;-) If you feel the need, Victor, only if you feel the need :-)
Yowie
Christina Websell - 26 Oct 2007 21:35 GMT > > When I first got to know my German friend Nuele we decided to get the > > war [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > were born. But we can still take responsbility for it if we are direct > decendents I totally disagree. WW2 was nothing to do with Nuele nor myself as neither of us were born then. I refuse to take any responsibility for WW2!
> I'm sure the decendants of WWII victims will be dealing with aftereffects > for generations to come. Nuele doesn't need to feel personally ashamed, > but that doesn't mean she's helpless to have a positive effect, either. So what do you think she should do, then?
Tweed
> Joyce jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 26 Oct 2007 22:01 GMT >> were born. But we can still take responsbility for it if we are direct >> decendents
> I totally disagree. WW2 was nothing to do with Nuele nor myself as neither > of us were born then. I refuse to take any responsibility for WW2! I think you might be confusing "take responsibility" for saying that you had something to do with it. I'm not saying that. I'm saying, shoulder some of the responsibility for *fixing* the problems that have come about as a result of things that happened in the past, even things that you had no control over or weren't even born. If we're not going to fix problems - yes, even the problems we didn't create - then who will?
I think anyone who works in feral cat rescue is doing that. Most of them are not at fault for cat overpopulation, since most of the rescue folks I know or know about are very responsible. But someone has to do something about cat overpopulation, and the rescuers, bless them, are the ones who are taking responsibility.
>> I'm sure the decendants of WWII victims will be dealing with aftereffects >> for generations to come. Nuele doesn't need to feel personally ashamed, >> but that doesn't mean she's helpless to have a positive effect, either.
> So what do you think she should do, then? Well, keeping in mind that it's not for me to say what Nuele should do, one possibility might be to donate money or volunteer time with an organization that helps the decendants of Holocaust survivors, or the families of victims who didn't survive.
She could vote for or campaign for politicians who support those efforts.
She could say to a decendant of a Jew, Rom, gay person, or anyone else who was affected by the Holocaust that she recognizes that they are still carrying the pain from what happened to their parent or grandparent. Often just an acknowledgement of this kind can be very healing. Many people have a hard time giving that kind of acknowledgement because they feel so ashamed, they can hardly bear to talk about it. I think that just makes it worse.
If she doesn't feel the need to do any of these things, that is certainly her business, and I'm not trying to sound righteous about it, as though she is *supposed* to do something. But since you mentioned that she feels ashamed, I was suggesting that she doesn't have to feel powerless about that.
Joyce
Adrian A - 26 Oct 2007 22:14 GMT >>> were born. But we can still take responsbility for it if we are >>> direct decendents [quoted text clipped - 48 lines] > > Joyce Don't forget, many of the German people were just as much victims of WWII as the allies.
 Signature Adrian (Owned by Snoopy & Bagheera) Cats leave pawprints on your heart http://community.webshots.com/user/clowderuk
CatNipped - 26 Oct 2007 22:18 GMT >>>> were born. But we can still take responsbility for it if we are >>>> direct decendents [quoted text clipped - 51 lines] > Don't forget, many of the German people were just as much victims of WWII > as the allies. Very true - Americans aren't the only ones who are victims of their own government! ;> <ducking and running>
Hugs,
CatNipped
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 26 Oct 2007 22:22 GMT > Don't forget, many of the German people were just as much victims of > WWII as the allies. That's very true. I don't know Tweed's friend Nuele's ancestry or how they did in the war, all I know is that Tweed said Nuele felt ashamed. So I was addressing that.
Joyce
Granby - 26 Oct 2007 22:35 GMT Before unsubscribing to this group I have a couple of things to say. I am sorry there is a, hopefully temporary, rift in this community.
Having said that I want to say anyone that knows Lee knows that she puts her money and her actions where her mouth is. She has rehomed three cats in the past few months. This after spending money that she doesn't always have at the vets to insure they are in good health or "fixed".
People have died in this country to insure that we have the right to question our laws.
Where animal rights is concerned is a "button" for many of us. We do our part to make sure authorities are aware of problems when we know.
It isn't bashing to say a thing is wrong and that another country does it better. Hopefully some politician will hear and try and change the rules.
To bring up all this about WW this and WW that is more than I want to deal with.
I hope all your four footed friends get better and those humans that are sick do the same.
May Bast and God bless you all
Gramby
> > Don't forget, many of the German people were just as much victims of > > WWII as the allies. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Joyce Christina Websell - 26 Oct 2007 22:57 GMT >>>> were born. But we can still take responsbility for it if we are >>>> direct decendents [quoted text clipped - 46 lines] >> mentioned that she feels ashamed, I was suggesting that she doesn't >> have to feel powerless about that. I won't be suggesting to her that she needs to do anything.
Tweed
> Don't forget, many of the German people were just as much victims of WWII > as the allies. jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 26 Oct 2007 23:19 GMT >>>> So what do you think she should do, then? [suggestions snipped]
>>> If she doesn't feel the need to do any of these things, that is >>> certainly her business, and I'm not trying to sound righteous about >>> it, as though she is *supposed* to do something. But since you >>> mentioned that she feels ashamed, I was suggesting that she doesn't >>> have to feel powerless about that.
> I won't be suggesting to her that she needs to do anything. OK, whatever. You're the one who asked for suggestions...
Joyce
Christina Websell - 26 Oct 2007 22:33 GMT > >> were born. But we can still take responsbility for it if we are direct > >> decendents [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > some of the responsibility for *fixing* the problems that have come about > as a result of things that happened in the past, Oh, absolutely not, I have enough to deal with in my own life. I do not want to take on problems from WW2, and neither does Nuele. Give me a clue about what you think I should do. And stop being ridiculous. We won the war. Fact. (and wait for for the flack) Teasing.
Tweed
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 26 Oct 2007 22:41 GMT > Oh, absolutely not, I have enough to deal with in my own life. I do not > want to take on problems from WW2, and neither does Nuele. > Give me a clue about what you think I should do. I already answered this in another post, Tweed. Besides which, I don't think you *should* do anything. I also have plenty to deal with in my own life and that limits what I can do about other things in the world, too. I really think you're misinterpreting what I'm saying.
Joyce
Daniel Mahoney - 26 Oct 2007 21:02 GMT > Again, it was a knee-jerk reaction - it irks me when Americans put down > their own country (something that seems to be in fashion here now-a-days). > But I was totally wrong to cast any aspersions on the UK in my defense of > the US. I apologize for having made you "narked"(?) [in the US "narked" > means gave information to the narcotics police about someone dealing in > drugs - weird, huh?] Lori, I hope that my occasional posts regarding US policy don't come across as nothing but US bashing. I do love my country, and I take a great deal of pride in some of the things we've accomplished. On the other hand, I'm also deeply ashamed of some of the things we've done and I'm not shy about expressing that.
Overall I think the US is a great place to live. It would be much better if we could get our current crop of government officials out of office and into jobs they're better qualified to do (like maybe digging ditches). And I do believe that some day soon we'll actually develop a foreign policy that's something more than a "let's give the whole world something to hate us for" plan.
I too hope that some day we can fix the problems facing us. All of us, worldwide. It's because of that hope that I support zero population growth, energy conservation, ecologically sound food production, and other issues. I am deathly afraid that it's too late to do any good, but I sure keep my fingers crossed that we can keep the world inhabitable for a few more generations.
Dan
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 26 Oct 2007 21:20 GMT Catnipped wrote:
>> it was a knee-jerk reaction - it irks me when Americans put down >> their own country (something that seems to be in fashion here >> now-a-days). But maybe it's more common now because there's a good reason for it?
> Lori, I hope that my occasional posts regarding US policy don't come > across as nothing but US bashing. I do love my country, and I take a great > deal of pride in some of the things we've accomplished. On the other hand, > I'm also deeply ashamed of some of the things we've done and I'm not shy > about expressing that.
> Overall I think the US is a great place to live. It would be much better > if we could get our current crop of government officials out of office and > into jobs they're better qualified to do (like maybe digging ditches). And > I do believe that some day soon we'll actually develop a foreign policy > that's something more than a "let's give the whole world something to hate > us for" plan.
> I too hope that some day we can fix the problems facing us. All of us, > worldwide. It's because of that hope that I support zero population > growth, energy conservation, ecologically sound food production, and other > issues. I am deathly afraid that it's too late to do any good, but I sure > keep my fingers crossed that we can keep the world inhabitable for a few > more generations. Thanks, Dan - my sentiments exactly. I don't think the US is the devil and every other country is pure goodness. (Anyone who's heard me rant about China knows that.) But because I am an American citizen, it's my obligation to recognize and point out the things that are being done in my name, if I disagree with them. Otherwise, I'm just being complicit. Unfortunately, there happen to be a lot of things happening in the current administration that I can't condone, so I'm critical a lot these days.
Joyce
CatNipped - 26 Oct 2007 21:29 GMT >> Again, it was a knee-jerk reaction - it irks me when Americans put down >> their own country (something that seems to be in fashion here [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > keep my fingers crossed that we can keep the world inhabitable for a few > more generations. No, Dan, I don't see your posts as US bashing. I think there's a big, *BIG* difference between disagreeing with US policies / laws / politicians - even expressing disdain for the current administration (I do so myself) - and, on the other hand, saying things like this or that country is more civilized than the US. The "US" as a whole includes me and my entire family, and I don't feel that I or my family are any more uncivilized than any other persons living elsewhere. When you say things like "the US is horrible because of (insert your reason here)" thus painting the entire country and everyone in it with the same broad brush, that's doing a huge diservice to those of us here who are caring, responsible "global" citizens.
Again, I really didn't mean to cause a big to-do or to insult anybody else, but I just get tired of people here saying disparaging things about a country and a people I think of as one of the greatest and grandest on earth *despite* our current leadership! The US has contributed a lot of things to the rest of the world since its inception, decency and compassion included. Our generosity as a people is unsurpassed, and much underappreciated.
Just as other people have justifiably been insulted by my remarks about their country, I think it would be obvious that I can be just as insulted by remarks about my country. I just don't "get" why it's suddenly so fashionable to bash the US and why it's unreasonable for US citizens to become upset by that bashing - we're supposed to just hang our heads and cry mea culpa?! I'm as proud of my country as the Brits are of theirs, why is they are justified in being insulted but I'm not by the same types of remarks? (And sorry, didn't mean to pick on the Brits again - you can substitute any country into that sentence to get my meaning.)
Sorry, but as I said, this *is* a hot button of mine.
Hugs,
CatNipped
> Dan CatNipped - 26 Oct 2007 21:38 GMT >>> Again, it was a knee-jerk reaction - it irks me when Americans put down >>> their own country (something that seems to be in fashion here [quoted text clipped - 46 lines] > else, but I just get tired of people here saying disparaging things about > a And by "here" I meant the US, not this newsgroup (who, as a whole, I think are kind and caring people who mostly go out of their way to NOT be insulting).
Hugs,
CatNipped
> country and a people I think of as one of the greatest and grandest on > earth *despite* our current leadership! The US has contributed a lot of [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > >> Dan Christina Websell - 26 Oct 2007 21:46 GMT >>> Again, it was a knee-jerk reaction - it irks me when Americans put down >>> their own country (something that seems to be in fashion here [quoted text clipped - 62 lines] > > Sorry, but as I said, this *is* a hot button of mine. In short - Brits are fed up because USA will not sign up to the Kyoto treaty.
Tweed
Daniel Mahoney - 26 Oct 2007 21:58 GMT > In short - Brits are fed up because USA will not sign up to the Kyoto > treaty. > > Tweed So are a lot of USAians.
Dan
CatNipped - 26 Oct 2007 22:04 GMT >> In short - Brits are fed up because USA will not sign up to the Kyoto >> treaty. >> >> Tweed > > So are a lot of USAians. YUP!
Hugs,
CatNipped
> Dan Sherry - 26 Oct 2007 22:12 GMT > >> In short - Brits are fed up because USA will not sign up to the Kyoto > >> treaty. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > CatNipped As is *any* responsible, global citizen. And that's a larger majority than you might think.
Sherry
CatNipped - 26 Oct 2007 22:07 GMT >>>> Again, it was a knee-jerk reaction - it irks me when Americans put down >>>> their own country (something that seems to be in fashion here [quoted text clipped - 67 lines] > In short - Brits are fed up because USA will not sign up to the Kyoto > treaty. I'm personally in favor of the Kyoto treaty, so should I be held personally responsible for the US not signing it even though I campaign for it, write my congressmen angry letters about it, etc.? That's kind of what I'm trying to get at here. I don't hold you or any other individual living the the UK personally responsible for everything the British government does. I'd just like the same courtesy.
Hugs,
CatNipped
> Tweed Christina Websell - 26 Oct 2007 23:12 GMT >> "CatNipped" <CatNipped@PossiblePlacehave justifiably been insulted by my >> remarks about [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > for it, write my congressmen angry letters about it, etc.? That's kind of > what I'm trying to get at here. Now where is anyone saying that you are reponsible for the US not signing?
<I don't hold you or any other individual living the the UK
> personally responsible for everything the British government does. I'd > just like the same courtesy. Eh? Time for bed here, nighty night.
Tweed
CatNipped - 29 Oct 2007 15:19 GMT > Now where is anyone saying that you are reponsible for the US not signing?
> Tweed This is sort of the crux of the problem, Tweed. I was wrong to say anything bad about anyone else's country. By saying something bad about it, I offended a number of people.
What I'm asking is, why is it so difficult to put the shoe on the other foot? I am constantly hearing/reading people saying/writing bad things about my country; but when I get offended about it everyone jumps down my throat with both boots like I'm supposed to just say, yeah, you're right, mea culpa, we're a sh*t country. I try to just shrug it off as US bashing is the current fashionable thing to do - but it makes me especially irritated when the person bashing the US is a person who is living here and enjoying all the benefits of being a US citizen.
I am *NOT* saying there is nothing wrong with the US - I can't stand the current administration; but I am sure the same is true for any country, we all have to work for change and, hopefully, become a worldwide citizenship.
But, again, can you understand (having been personally offended by my comments about the UK) that I too can [have the right to] get offended by nasty comments about *my* country?
Hugs,
CatNipped
Yowie - 27 Oct 2007 00:29 GMT <snip>
> In short - Brits are fed up because USA will not sign up to the Kyoto > treaty. Australia has signed it but has steadfastly refused to ratify it into law. Much to the disgust of large percentage of its citizens and residents.
Yowie
Suz - 27 Oct 2007 15:43 GMT On Oct 26, 3:46?pm, "Christina Websell" <spamf...@tinawebsell.wanadoo.co.uk> wrote:
> >>> Again, it was a knee-jerk reaction - it irks me when Americans put down > >>> their own country (something that seems to be in fashion here [quoted text clipped - 69 lines] > > - Show quoted text - In my opinion, the decision to not sign reflects US Corporate policey more than it does US citizen policey. Suz&Spicey
Sherry - 27 Oct 2007 17:27 GMT > On Oct 26, 3:46?pm, "Christina Websell" > [quoted text clipped - 80 lines] > more than it does US citizen policey. > Suz&Spicey Absolutely. Maybe we should just split off and form our own union. We can call it "The Peoples Republic of Spicey". :-) :-)
Sherry
Sherry - 26 Oct 2007 21:19 GMT > >> If you live in the UK, I hope you'll accept my abject apologies for any > >> aspersions I made to your country. The odd thing is that I *am* an [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > > CatNipped I get the same knee-jerk reaction, too, Lori. I love my country; warts and all; and I do get offended sometimes. Especially by armchair animal activists. . Fine, if you don't like something -- but what are you DOING about it? Are you at least writing your congressman for stricter abuse laws? Do you jump in when there *is* animal abuse in your town, do you speak with the DA, lobby for stricter sentencing? If there's a dogfighting ring, cockfighting, whatever -- are you at the sheriff's department *asking* why it's not busted? At the end of the day, opinions aren't worth squat. Everybody's got one.
This post basically came outta nowhere, it's just a weird mood that I'm in ATM. Not pointing fingers at anyone. I just get tired of (IRL too)... all the doom & gloom, whining, bitching about the poor animals, our abuse laws aren't strict enough, yada yada. Then nobody even has the guts to write a letter to the editor and sign their own name. Bleh. I get at least one phone call a week because I'm on the board of directors, and somebody's got some kind of issue they want to drone on and on about. But just ask them to *get involved* and they have a million excuses. They just want to bitch.
Sherry
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 26 Oct 2007 21:29 GMT > I do get offended sometimes. Especially by armchair animal activists. > Fine, if you don't like something -- but what are you DOING about > it? Are you at least writing your congressman for stricter abuse > laws? Do you jump in when there *is* animal abuse in your town, do > you speak with the DA, lobby for stricter sentencing?
> [snip]
> I get at least one phone call a week because I'm on the board of > directors, and somebody's got some kind of issue they want to drone > on and on about. But just ask them to *get involved* and they have > a million excuses. They just want to bitch. I don't completely agree with this. I guess it depends on the bitching and how someone is communicating, but I think that talking about issues to people can help to bring about change, too. An intelligent argument about an issue, that gets people thinking about it and maybe rethinking their position, can be pretty valuable. Especially if you're using a wide-distribution method such as publishing, radio or the internet, and lots of people are reading what you have to say. Don't underestimate the power of the written/spoken word to change people's minds. It's not all mindless bitching and whining.
Joyce
Sherry - 26 Oct 2007 21:48 GMT On Oct 26, 3:29 pm, jXwXeXrXmXoX...@sonic.net wrote:
> > I do get offended sometimes. Especially by armchair animal activists. > > Fine, if you don't like something -- but what are you DOING about [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > Joyce I don't agree. Bitching is just bitching, unless you're discussing ways to bring about change also. Discussion on a newsgroup may inspire someone to write letters, or otherwise get involved. But we should already be doing that, if we're 'het up' enough to gripe about it.
Sherry
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 26 Oct 2007 22:14 GMT > > I think that talking about issues > > to people can help to bring about change, too. An intelligent argument > > about an issue, that gets people thinking about it and maybe rethinking > > their position, can be pretty valuable.
> I don't agree. Bitching is just bitching, unless you're discussing > ways to bring about change also. Well, pretty much every time I've made a contribution toward a positive effort to change something I don't like, it's because I've heard, read, or seen (as in a film) about a situation that I find unacceptable. I can't experience everything first-hand - many things go on in places far away from me. So I have to rely on the people who inform the public about those problems, and I very much appreciate the work they do.
I really believe that we must make contributions in the best way we can as individuals. We all have different talents, as well as different limitations. An extremely shy person isn't going to go talk to the DA, but maybe they'll give money. A deeply depressed person might not be able to get out and go to a protest march, but maybe they'll put a sign in their window, thus inspiring someone else to go to the march. An extremely poor person might not be able to donate money to a cause, but maybe they'll be the one who talks to the DA. An illiterate person will not be able to write persuasively about a situation or issue, but maybe they'll sit in an office and answer phones. Everyone has their particular niche and calling.
I don't think it's for anyone to judge exactly *how* a person fits into the overall work that gets done to change something. But I do know, from personal experience, that the people who talk, write, make films, and even sing songs about issues have inspired almost every activist thing I've ever done.
Joyce
Sherry - 26 Oct 2007 22:52 GMT On Oct 26, 4:14 pm, jXwXeXrXmXoX...@sonic.net wrote:
> > > I think that talking about issues > > > to people can help to bring about change, too. An intelligent argument [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > > Joyce Of course I didn't mean you need to set the world on fire. Just do your part, the part you're able to do, no matter how small. I've just always been a doer. I never had patience for the people who show up at the shelter and just want to jaw-jack about the problems in the community, but never wanted to actually *do* anything. "Help or get out of the way." Or get out your checkbook. I never saw how their pontificating ever solved a problem. Sherry
Sherry
|
|
|