Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / Cat Anecdotes / October 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Does your vet accept Pet Insurance?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
jmcquown - 11 Oct 2007 23:15 GMT
One vet I went to when my dog Sampson was still with me had pamphlets about
purchasing pet insurance.  He was already 13 at that point and I'd just
moved.  The vet said nope, we don't take pet insurance.

Then Persia came along, demanding I let her inside.  She was at least 2,
maybe 3 years old at the time.  The vet said even if I had insurance for her
they wouldn't accept it.  What's the deal?  Why shouldn't vets accept
insurance just as doctors do for people?  I wouldn't have cared about
filling out paperwork.

Most of you know she had very expensive bladder surgery for crystalline
oxolate formations in 2004.  They also found a tumor which they excised.
She's been eating prescription food ever since, which isn't cheap.

I wouldn't expect the insurance to pay for her pet food, and in fact I won a
contest which allowed me free food for her for a year.  But my goodness...
to not accept pet insurance?  What's the deal with that?

Do any of you have pet insurance?  Do you find it beneficial?  Just curious.
Persia is now probably 10 or 11 years old and given her prior health
situation probably wouldn't qualify for insurance.  I'm just curious.

Jill
jofirey - 11 Oct 2007 23:45 GMT
> One vet I went to when my dog Sampson was still with me had pamphlets
> about
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> Jill

Most pet insurance pays specified amounts for certain procedures.  They also
have their own ideas about what is ordinary and necessary in many
situations.  It is pretty standard for the vet to bill the owner and then
for the owner to have to try to get reimbursed by the insurance company.

There just isn't an up side for the vets to bill the insurance companies and
to accept what they pay as payment in full.

Jo
David Stevenson - 12 Oct 2007 01:33 GMT
>Most pet insurance pays specified amounts for certain procedures.  They also
>have their own ideas about what is ordinary and necessary in many
>situations.  It is pretty standard for the vet to bill the owner and then
>for the owner to have to try to get reimbursed by the insurance company.

  That's terrible.  No wonder you have problems with insurance!

>There just isn't an up side for the vets to bill the insurance companies and
>to accept what they pay as payment in full.

  Can't blame them.  Obviously, you need better pet insurance.  Ours has
limits, of course, but nothing like that.

Signature

David Stevenson            Storypage: http://blakjak.org/sty_menu.htm
Liverpool, England, UK    <webjak666@googlemail.com>   Emails welcome
N Poo:  SI O+W B 14 Y L+ W++ C+ I T+ A- E H++ V- F Q P+ B+ PA+ PL SC
Minke:  SI W+Cp B 5 Y L W+ C++ I T A- E H++ V++ F- Q- P B PA+ PL+ SC-
Please substitute  .org  for  .com else eddresses will fail this year

MaryL - 12 Oct 2007 01:07 GMT
> One vet I went to when my dog Sampson was still with me had pamphlets
> about
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> Jill

This isn't specifically an answer to your question about why some vets won't
accept pet insurance.  However, I did check on a number of policies after I
adopted Duffy, and I came to the conclusion that these policies are usually
a waste of money.  Most of them have a cap on what they will cover, and the
cap is usually unreasonably low.  Many cover only specifically listed
problems, and they leave out some of the more common and more expensive
issues.  Costs of the policies often rise with the age of the pet -- which
may make sense given that aging pets have a higher incidence of needs, but
that also means the policies become less useful as need rises.  Worse, there
are some that actually cut off at certain ages or reduce the actual amount
of coverage.

My conclusion:  I opted not to take out pet insurance and instead to "self
insure."  I have put a small amount into a savings account just for Duffy
and Holly, beginning in February 2003, the month after I adopted Duffy .  I
have never touched it because it is reserved for true emergencies or very
large expenses.  I do not use it for routine exams or even for
consultations/medications such as what I incurred this week when Duffy semed
ill.  Fortunately, it was one of those 24-hour problems, and Duffy is on the
way back to his usual, bouncy self -- but the point is that the savings
account remains intact for future emergencies.

I do realize that much of this is not helpful to you because you have
written about your financial problems that might make this process
impossible, and Persia is older than Holly and Duffy were when I started
down this road.  This type of action works best when started at a relatively
young age so there is time for the savings account to grow before it is
needed.  However, I am piggybacking off your question because I think this
is really an important topic to discuss.

MaryL

Photos of Duffy and Holly:      >'o'<
Duffy:  http://tinyurl.com/cslwf
Holly:  http://tinyurl.com/9t68o
Duffy and Holly together:  http://tinyurl.com/8b47e
jmcquown - 12 Oct 2007 01:40 GMT
>> Do any of you have pet insurance?  Do you find it beneficial?  Just
>> curious.
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> Holly:  http://tinyurl.com/9t68o
> Duffy and Holly together:  http://tinyurl.com/8b47e

It's important, sure.  And I didn't bring it up because of any financial
issues I may or may not have.  I was fortunate enough when I lost my job to
have close to a years salary set aside.  Then I won that contest that
provided Persia's prescription x/d food free (sans tax) for a year.  I was
just curious about pet insurance.

Jill (loves the brave cat Duffy!
David Stevenson - 12 Oct 2007 01:31 GMT
>One vet I went to when my dog Sampson was still with me had pamphlets about
>purchasing pet insurance.  He was already 13 at that point and I'd just
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>Persia is now probably 10 or 11 years old and given her prior health
>situation probably wouldn't qualify for insurance.  I'm just curious.

  Minke is insured.  No earlier cats were insured but probably should
have been.  Too late for Nanki Poo: the cat has to be under a certain
age to be accepted.

  When we purchased Minke from the breeder she had a card to fill in
which gave us six weeks free insurance for Minke, and then we could
continue it or not as we felt.  No doubt the breeder got a commission.

  When you go to the vet they ask you whether you have pet insurance: it
is just normal.

Signature

David Stevenson            Storypage: http://blakjak.org/sty_menu.htm
Liverpool, England, UK    <webjak666@googlemail.com>   Emails welcome
N Poo:  SI O+W B 14 Y L+ W++ C+ I T+ A- E H++ V- F Q P+ B+ PA+ PL SC
Minke:  SI W+Cp B 5 Y L W+ C++ I T A- E H++ V++ F- Q- P B PA+ PL+ SC-
Please substitute  .org  for  .com else eddresses will fail this year

Yowie - 12 Oct 2007 03:04 GMT
<snip>

> Do any of you have pet insurance?  Do you find it beneficial?  Just
> curious.
> Persia is now probably 10 or 11 years old and given her prior health
> situation probably wouldn't qualify for insurance.  I'm just curious.

No vet I know takes pet insurance directly - if you have pet insurance here,
you have to pay the vet out of your own pocket and then claim back from the
insurance company. The insurance company will pay 80% of the bill.

Do the critters have pet insurance? No. It didn't seem worth it. The only
pet 'health' insurance I could find was $30 a month per pet. The maximum you
could claim per year was $1000, and it would only ever pay up to $500 per
'incident'. It had an excess of $100. It also insisted (possibly not
unreasonably) that before it would pay up on anything, that the animal had
to be fully vaccinated, chipped and had regular checkups, and wouldn't pay
out if it didn't have that proof.

It struck me that it wouldn't be worth it. I could cover $500 worth of
vetinary care if the need arose - its the bigger bills that I would want
help with. It also didn't help with the regular vetinary expenses of shots
or checkups, which are invariably just under $100 a pop. Seemed like a total
rip-off to me.

Now if I wanted to insure their lives, that was a different story, but
again, a nice  payout once they are dead is silly, i want the nice big
payout to save their lives if thats what it needed.

Nope, pet insurance seemed like a waste of money to me.

Your pet insurance might be different.

Yowie
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 12 Oct 2007 05:42 GMT
> Do the critters have pet insurance? No. It didn't seem worth it. The only
> pet 'health' insurance I could find was $30 a month per pet. The maximum you
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> to be fully vaccinated, chipped and had regular checkups, and wouldn't pay
> out if it didn't have that proof.

> It struck me that it wouldn't be worth it. I could cover $500 worth of
> vetinary care if the need arose - its the bigger bills that I would want
> help with. It also didn't help with the regular vetinary expenses of shots
> or checkups, which are invariably just under $100 a pop. Seemed like a total
> rip-off to me.

Just take that $30 and put it in a special account, not to be touched,
that's there for pet insurance - from *you*. No administrative costs,
no maximum payments per "incident", and no deductibles (what you call
"excess", I think).

Of course, one has to have enough money so that you're not tempted
to raid the pet's emergency vet money to pay other bills. But if you
don't, then you certainly can't afford pet insurance either!

Joyce
Lesley - 12 Oct 2007 20:41 GMT
On 11 Oct, 21:42, jXwXeXrXmXoX...@sonic.net wrote:

> Just take that $30 and put it in a special account, not to be touched,
> that's there for pet insurance - from *you*. No administrative costs,
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> to raid the pet's emergency vet money to pay other bills. But if you
> don't, then you certainly can't afford pet insurance either!

A few years ago when we were not in a position to save for vet bills-
we had two credit cards. We had enough for our day to day expenses but
we had them as backup, we had some very specific rules about them i.e.

1. No more than ?100 per month per card to be spent (The cards had a
total value of 2,000) by any one person on their own

2. Whoever spent that money was repsonsible for paying statements in
full by ther due date

3. Any purchase over ?200.00 has to agreed by both of us (there are
certain advantages for example to buying  with a credit card)

4. If there was an emergency involving a cat then the person nearest
i.e. if I was at work and Dave was at home- got the cat to the vet,
used the cards and we could sort it out after

5. This did not cover routine vet vists- although when we were both
out of work and a couple of girls needed spayed we did use the cards
because I'd just started a job so we were short for a few weeks

This served us and if needs be would still serve us if we had to- I've
heard of people with sick cats having to argue with the vet about
whether they needed to pay up front and claim from thei insurance or
whether the vet would take that policy and bill the company whereas I
never heard a vet refuse a credit catf

Lesley

Slave of the Fabulous Furballs
David Stevenson - 12 Oct 2007 12:48 GMT
>"jmcquown" <jmcquown@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
>news:5n7lj8Fged0dU1@mid.individual.net...
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>to be fully vaccinated, chipped and had regular checkups, and wouldn't pay
>out if it didn't have that proof.

                                GBP     USD     EUR     AUD
Our plan costs per month       11.45   23.20   16.37   25.72
Maximum benefit per year        6000   12161    8579   13479
Excess                            65     132      93     146

Other benefits:
Boarding cattery fees            250     507     357     562
Complementary treatment          750    1520    1072    1684
Theft or straying                225     456     322     505
Advertising and Reward           250     507     357     562
Holiday Cancellation             500    1013     705    1123

Currency conversion from   http://blakjak.org/curr_con.htm

  It seemed worth it to me, though not perhaps over-generous.  Of
course, they require the cat to be vaccinated and so on, but he would be
anyway.

Martha wrote
>Consumers Reports says pet insurance is a rip-off because the policies
>contain so many exclusions in the very fine print.

  Is that world-wide, or just in one country?  I have read the
exclusions carefully, and apart from the obvious ones [will not pay over
limit set, will not pay for pre-existing illness, etc] there do not seem
any.

Signature

David Stevenson            Storypage: http://blakjak.org/sty_menu.htm
Liverpool, England, UK    <webjak666@googlemail.com>   Emails welcome
N Poo:  SI O+W B 14 Y L+ W++ C+ I T+ A- E H++ V- F Q P+ B+ PA+ PL SC
Minke:  SI W+Cp B 5 Y L W+ C++ I T A- E H++ V++ F- Q- P B PA+ PL+ SC-
Please substitute  .org  for  .com else eddresses will fail this year

MaryL - 12 Oct 2007 13:24 GMT
>>"jmcquown" <jmcquown@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
>>news:5n7lj8Fged0dU1@mid.individual.net...
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
> carefully, and apart from the obvious ones [will not pay over limit set,
> will not pay for pre-existing illness, etc] there do not seem any.

Does your policy exclude (or include) a specific list of illnesses?  And is
the 6,000 maximum per year a maximum for all veterinary care, or could that
amount be spent on a single problem (such as expensive surgery and boarding
required for medical care, as contrasted with boarding when someone is on
vacation)?  If the boarding fee is for medical needs, that amount would not
cover a very extensive stay.  Many policies (at least in the US) list what
sounds like a large annual maximum, but then they put much more restrictive
limits on care for a single illness (such as cancer).

MaryL
Karen AKA Kajikit - 12 Oct 2007 04:45 GMT
>One vet I went to when my dog Sampson was still with me had pamphlets about
>purchasing pet insurance.  He was already 13 at that point and I'd just
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>Persia is now probably 10 or 11 years old and given her prior health
>situation probably wouldn't qualify for insurance.  I'm just curious.

The vet doesn't accept the pet insurance - you have to pay the vet and
then claim the money back yourself... we have the girls insured but
we've never claimed on it.
Martha - 12 Oct 2007 10:24 GMT
> Do any of you have pet insurance?  Do you find it beneficial?  Just curious.
> Persia is now probably 10 or 11 years old and given her prior health
> situation probably wouldn't qualify for insurance.  I'm just curious.

Consumers Reports says pet insurance is a rip-off because the policies
contain so many exclusions in the very fine print.

Martha
Granby - 12 Oct 2007 12:11 GMT
My vet told me to put the $50.00 a month in a cookie jar and save it, it
would cover more than the insurance.  I called four vets yeserday and none
of them dealt with it.  Said, "we bill the customer then they bill the
insurance company."  Lost cause so far as I could see.

>> Do any of you have pet insurance?  Do you find it beneficial?  Just
>> curious.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Martha
MaryL - 12 Oct 2007 13:26 GMT
> My vet told me to put the $50.00 a month in a cookie jar and save it, it
> would cover more than the insurance.  I called four vets yeserday and none
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>>
>> Martha

Well, that part alone would not necessarily negate the value.  I have to do
that for some of my own prescriptions, for example (the ones for diabetic
supplies).  The big problem is that some of these pet insurance companies
are notorious for never paying -- they find all sorts of  "exclusions" and
"exceptions."

MaryL
Christina Websell - 12 Oct 2007 22:47 GMT
> One vet I went to when my dog Sampson was still with me had pamphlets
> about
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> Persia is now probably 10 or 11 years old and given her prior health
> situation probably wouldn't qualify for insurance.  I'm just curious.

My vets here do accept pet insurance, but that insurance is carefully
calibrated that most routine visits for minor problems are not covered until
you have spent x amount over and above a couple of consultations.
You can ignore it unless your cat decides to have a horrible disease or get
multiple fractures, but as we all don't know if that will happen we often
risk it without insurance.
I don't have medical insurance for my cats.  I put away per month directly
from my wages a similar amount that the insurance would ask into a bank
account for my cats.  It is more than enough to fund their veterinary care.
I did it for my late dogs too and it built up to fund any/all the operations
and illnesses they needed as they got older and older.

Tweed
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.