>>Dead millionaire.
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Correction:
> Searchers can't find location where plane went down.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
From: tom <me@privacy.net>
>Here are better questions:
OK, serious answers.
>1. Didn't he file a flight plan or give any idea where he was going?
No
He did not file a flight plan, nor was he required to file a flight plan.
A flight plan is only of value for a point to point trip. He was just heading
out to look around.
To see how useless a flight plan would be, look at the form at
http://forms.faa.gov/forms/faa7233-1.pdf
And Yes
People had an idea where he was going.
>Perhaps take SOMEONE along with him?
Why?
And it's only a 2 place plane.
>2. Didn't the plane he was flying have an emergency or satellite
>transponder? With that shouldn't they have be able to locate him? IF he
>is lost that is.
Yes.
The plane had an old style ELT (Emergency Locator Transmitter) that
transmits on 121.5 Mhz (aviation emergency freq.). No signal has
been tracked, but any pilot will tell you that they are notoriously
unreliable.
He also may have been wearing a wristwatch with GPS tracking (a gift
from Richard Branson). Again....nothing.
>3. For someone who is said to be so good at surviving shouldn't he have
>carried more survival supplies, cell/satellite phone or something?
I've no idea what supplies he had with him. But I get the impression that
he had little or nothing. Not sure if he had a cell phone, but I would doubt it.
It probably wouldn't have been working in a remote area, anyway.
Many planes carry a minimal survival kit (I carry a quart of water, 2 mylar
blankets, a couple of fruit bars, a 10'x10' sheet of plastic, 20 ft of 400 lbs
strength rope, a small ball of string, a magnesium fire starter, 3 1/2" folding knife,
and a .357 magnum revolver with 12 rds. of ammo).
The Decathlon is an aerobatic plane, so I would doubt it would regularly
carry a "survival kit".
><sniff, sniff> Yes, I smell a media stunt especially since Barron Hilton
>- you know the dad of loser Paris "Media Whore" Hilton - is involved in
>the "search" effort. I bet SF is yucking it up in some "Hilton" hotel
>somewhere laughing at the people looking for him.
I'll bet you're right, and he's wearing your old tin foil hat so they can't
track his brain waves.
BTW, the only reason I bothered to answer is because some others
may have the same questions, but don't consider this a joke.
tom - 13 Sep 2007 05:06 GMT
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> plan. A flight plan is only of value for a point to point trip. He was
> just heading out to look around.
Not according to statement from http:
//www.cbs8.com/stories/story.102590.html.
Unless otherwise noted all other quotes and references some from this
link.
<quote>
McMullen and other survival experts faulted Fossett for not filing a
flight plan, which might have allowed searchers to focus on a smaller
area.
"The itinerary I filed for my 2001 hike saved my life," McMullen said.
</unquote>
<quote>
Temperatures in the search area have been in the 80s and 90s, with lows
in the 50s and 60s. Shelter from the sun would be just as important as
water, McMullen said.
McMullen knows what he's talking about. Six years ago, he found himself
stranded with a severely sprained ankle for three nights in Death Valley
National Park. He stayed in the shade of a tree until he was rescued by a
military helicopter, with the help of a detailed itinerary he had left
his wife.
"You'll lose water faster than you can absorb it in heat, and that's why
a shelter is so important," he said.
</unquote>
> People had an idea where he was going.
>
>>Perhaps take SOMEONE along with him?
>
> Why?
Here's why:
<quote>
"He's either so injured he can't signal or he's perished," said David
McMullen of Berkeley, Calif., a leader of the hiking group Desert
Survivors, whose members frequently venture into some of the country's
harshest terrain.
"We still find people against all odds," she said. "Maybe he's got a
couple of broken arms and can't signal."
>/unquote>
If he brought someone with him PERHAPS they could signal or not.
> And it's only a 2 place plane.
Which leaves room for "someone". At least ONE person that could help.
>>2. Didn't the plane he was flying have an emergency or satellite
>>transponder? With that shouldn't they have be able to locate him? IF he
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> with 12 rds. of ammo). The Decathlon is an aerobatic plane, so I would
> doubt it would regularly carry a "survival kit".
Considering this about the area he was going to:
"People can go only two or three days without water in the summer,
experts say, and Fossett would be hard-pressed to find water in
unfamiliar country, even if he was in good health. Nevada, the driest
state in the nation with less than 10 inches of precipitation a year, had
an unusually dry winter, and stream flows usually diminish by the late
summer even in wet years."
He had no reason without proper preparation going into the area he did.
Which indicates either he is an idiot - think Darwin awards who deserves
to die because of stupidity if he did actually go into this area
unprepared - or he really never went and this IS a stunt of some kind to
get his name in the media.
> I'll bet you're right, and he's wearing your old tin foil hat so they
> can't track his brain waves.
What? tin foil hats have to do with goverment conspiricies, and such.
This has nothing to do with that but with someone who probably staged
something to get his name in the media. At least I hope that is what he
did. Otherwise he is dead because of his own - and no one elses
stupidity. By the way you really are an idiot.
> BTW, the only reason I bothered to answer is because some others may
> have the same questions, but don't consider this a joke.
No you answered because you are a moron and could not resist. I don't
consider it a joke but I consider you and Steve F a joke until such time
that he is found dead or alive that turns out to be NOT a part of some
media stunt.
tom
Nomen Nescio - 13 Sep 2007 08:40 GMT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
From: tom <me@privacy.net>
>McMullen and other survival experts faulted Fossett for not filing a
>flight plan, which might have allowed searchers to focus on a smaller
>area.
<snip>
>McMullen knows what he's talking about. Six years ago, he found himself
>stranded with a severely sprained ankle for three nights in Death Valley
>National Park.
That's the best laugh I've had all day.
A "survival expert" stranded for 3 days with a sprained ankle.
The pansy would have probably required rescue if he broke a toenail.
If he ever writes a book on wilderness survival, I've got the perfect title
for it.................."HEEEEEEEEEELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
>"He's either so injured he can't signal or he's perished," said David
>McMullen of Berkeley, Calif., a leader of the hiking group Desert
>Survivors
sh.t, this just keeps getting better.
"Desert Survivors"
I love irony.
>whose members frequently venture into some of the country's
>harshest terrain.
I'd bet they couldn't make it to "Starbucks" and back without calling an
ambulance.
I gotta E-mail your post to a friend of mine. He'll probably pee himself
laughing.
A few years ago he finished climbing the last 100 ft of an ice cliff with a
broken wrist.
> Here are better questions:
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> 3. For someone who is said to be so good at surviving shouldn't he have
> carried more survival supplies, cell/satellite phone or something?
[H&B snipped from groups line]
At least one good thing has come of this so far. Shortly after Fossett
went missing the Civil Air Patrol did their search of his expected flight
path. This time, when they detected an ELT that was on the air by
accident, I've been led to believe that they sent someone to investigate
and actually took steps to get the problems remedied. This has been a
problem for a long time - ELT's going off when a plane taxies over a bump
too fast, etc. Maybe the CAP showing up in your hangar to discuss why your
ELT is transmitting might get a few more pilots to actually pay attention
to their ELTs.
Nomen Nescio - 12 Sep 2007 17:42 GMT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
From: Daniel Mahoney <dan@catfolks.net>
>At least one good thing has come of this so far. Shortly after Fossett
>went missing the Civil Air Patrol did their search of his expected flight
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>ELT is transmitting might get a few more pilots to actually pay attention
>to their ELTs.
You're supposed to check your ELT at the end of the flight to insure
that a hard landing didn't set it off (I've never made one of those, myself, but
I hear rumors that they do occur :) ).
As I've said, they're very unreliable. I heard a story a while ago about a plane
that made a gear up landing.........trashed to plane............ELT never went off.
Two years later, someone walked by the (yet to be repaired) airframe and
slapped it with the palm of his hand..........The old ELT activated.
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 12 Sep 2007 19:39 GMT
> At least one good thing has come of this so far. Shortly after Fossett
> went missing the Civil Air Patrol did their search of his expected flight
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> ELT is transmitting might get a few more pilots to actually pay attention
> to their ELTs.
English?? :)
Are these electronic signals that go off when a plane is in trouble?
Joyce
Daniel Mahoney - 12 Sep 2007 21:59 GMT
> English?? :)
>
> Are these electronic signals that go off when a plane is in trouble?
>
> Joyce
Yep. ELTs (emergency locater transmitters) turn on automatically when they
experience a jolt in excess of so many g-forces. When they turn on they
transmit a warbling signal on 121.5 MHz. A lot of pilots accidentally turn
them on by bumping the test switch, or by taking a bump too hard, and
don't notice because they don't listen to the emergency frequency.
It's not at all unusual to hear ELT signals coming from hangars and
tie-down areas when the plane sending the signal is not in distress.
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 12 Sep 2007 23:36 GMT
> > Are these electronic signals that go off when a plane is in trouble?
> Yep. ELTs (emergency locater transmitters) turn on automatically when they
> experience a jolt in excess of so many g-forces. When they turn on they
> transmit a warbling signal on 121.5 MHz. A lot of pilots accidentally turn
> them on by bumping the test switch, or by taking a bump too hard, and
> don't notice because they don't listen to the emergency frequency.
> It's not at all unusual to hear ELT signals coming from hangars and
> tie-down areas when the plane sending the signal is not in distress.
Thanks for the explanation. I wonder what causes them to go off in the
hangar?
Joyce
badwilson - 13 Sep 2007 01:22 GMT
>>> Are these electronic signals that go off when a plane is in trouble?
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Joyce
They don't go off in the hangar, they go off from a hard landing or
taxiing over a bump or the pilot accidentally elbows the switch on while
doing checklists or whatever. Then the pilot will return the plane to
the hangar without having listened to 121.5 and the ELT remains on until
the emergency crew arrives. Aaargh.

Signature
Britta
Purring is an automatic safety valve device for dealing with happiness
overflow.
Check out pictures of Vino at:
http://picasaweb.google.com/badwilson