> Adorable! How many of you have seen the "Awesome Pawsome"
> program on Animal Planet?
I love that program!
> More than any other of the big cats,
> these seem just overgrown kittens, with all the charm and
> affectionate behaviour of your own furry family.
There was something about tigers on last night - might've even been
Awesome Pawsome, but I only caught the last few minutes of it, so
I'm not sure. But yeah, those tigers were just like giant housecats,
giving head rubs and rolling around on their backs, and so on. One of
the closing shots was of a guy surrounded by about 6 full-grown tigers,
all acting like he was their Daddy. Usually, one would not want to
find oneself surrounded by 6 tigers, but these guys were like a family.
> I challenge you to watch it without thinking "I WANT one" at
> least once (despite the impracticalities of actually living
> with a creature that large and dangerous).
Well, you know about the impracticalities, and I know about them,
and probably everyone reading this newsgroup knows about them. But
as much as I love these shows, I feel like they're always sending
a mixed message to the TV viewers. One one hand, they say, "Tigers
belong in the wild. They're not house pets. It would be unsafe and
cruel to keep a tiger in your home..." etc, etc. On the other,
they show this utterly adorable baby tiger cub playing with the
children and the dog! Who in their right mind *wouldn't* want one??
And sadly, you know that some idiot watching the show will see the
cuteness and ignore the verbal message.
Joyce
Christina Websell - 28 Aug 2007 00:18 GMT
> > Adorable! How many of you have seen the "Awesome Pawsome"
> > program on Animal Planet?
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> And sadly, you know that some idiot watching the show will see the
> cuteness and ignore the verbal message.
All big cats are cute as cubs, but as adults they are dangerous. Its stupid
to think otherwise. I remember a man - I think at Howletts Wild Animal Park
here in the UK some years ago - who totally trusted a tiger he had reared
from a cub. Unfortunately it killed him.
Tweed
EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) - 28 Aug 2007 18:55 GMT
>>>Adorable! How many of you have seen the "Awesome Pawsome"
>>>program on Animal Planet?
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
> here in the UK some years ago - who totally trusted a tiger he had reared
> from a cub. Unfortunately it killed him.
Probably unintentionally! Like the Siegfried and Roy white
tiger whose apparent intention was to PROTECT her trainer,
but she badly injured him, instead. (It's kind of a reverse
situation to people allowing small children unsupervised
access to kittens and puppies - they don't INTEND to harm
them, they just don't realize that their relative strength
can pose a threat.)
Kreisleriana - 28 Aug 2007 19:11 GMT
>>>>Adorable! How many of you have seen the "Awesome Pawsome"
>>>>program on Animal Planet?
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
> harm them, they just don't realize that their relative strength can pose a
> threat.)
Which is a very good reason not to keep them as pets, or get involved with
them without years of training and specialization. The Siegfried and Roy
incident happened in the same summer as the Ming the tiger episode here in
New York City-- very weird at the time, this proliferation of people who
seemed to think they could or should handle tigers.
My argument at the time went as possible, OK, let's assume that she DOES
"only want to play" or protect, or any number of non-malicious things. But
she is still four hundred pounds, and tigers "just playing," hurt each
other-- as do pint-size domestic cats. What chance do *you* have against a
frisky, four-hundred pound tiger with five-inch teeth and claws?