Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / Cat Anecdotes / June 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Latest on the melamine scandal

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Marina - 30 May 2007 04:07 GMT
Death penalty for China official:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/6699441.stm

Signature

Marina, Miranda and Caliban. In loving memory of Frank and Nikki.

Sherry - 30 May 2007 04:22 GMT
> Death penalty for China official:
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/6699441.stm
>
> --
> Marina, Miranda and Caliban. In loving memory of Frank and Nikki.

Wow. At first reading I thought the death penalty was unusually harsh.
Then I
read on, and realized how many deaths had occurred because of this
corrupt
man. The one that really got me was the eleven babies that died from
drinking
powdered milk that had zero nutritional value. They died from
malnutrition!
Unbelievable. This is an absolutely horrible situation.

Sherry
Karen - 30 May 2007 04:25 GMT
>> Death penalty for China official:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Sherry

Problem is, it is probably less this guys fault than the whole system
but his death will be seen (or they will spin it as ) the problem being
"dealth with" instead of FIXED. Just one more reason though why we
shouldn't be importing anything edible from China.
EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) - 30 May 2007 16:45 GMT
> Problem is, it is probably less this guys fault than the whole system
> but his death will be seen (or they will spin it as ) the problem being
> "dealth with" instead of FIXED. Just one more reason though why we
> shouldn't be importing anything edible from China.

Good thing Marco Polo didn't feel that way!  (Where would
Italian cuisine be without pasta?)
Marina - 30 May 2007 04:43 GMT
>> Death penalty for China official:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> malnutrition!
> Unbelievable. This is an absolutely horrible situation.

Yes, those babies got me too. It seems he caused a lot of misery in his
own country, as well as elsewhere. I would prefer it if his sentence
would be changed to life imprisonment, though.

Signature

Marina, Miranda and Caliban. In loving memory of Frank and Nikki.

jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 30 May 2007 05:41 GMT

>> Wow. At first reading I thought the death penalty was unusually harsh.
>> Then I read on, and realized how many deaths had occurred because of
>> this corrupt man. The one that really got me was the eleven babies
>> that died from drinking powdered milk that had zero nutritional value.
>> They died from malnutrition! Unbelievable. This is an absolutely
>> horrible situation.

> Yes, those babies got me too. It seems he caused a lot of misery in his
> own country, as well as elsewhere. I would prefer it if his sentence
> would be changed to life imprisonment, though.

I'm glad something is being done. I agree with you that putting him to
death by itself won't really solve anything, but they're pretty execution-
happy in China. I thought this country was bad, but according to Amnesty
International, China far outstrips most other countries in the number of
executions.

But if it also means they're really going to overhaul their food safety
system, it might make a real difference. I'm sure nobody there is happy
that their reputation is in the toilet world-wide.

Funny they didn't mention the Panamanians who died from poisoned medicines
shipped from China. That was a pretty big tragedy, too.

Joyce
EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) - 30 May 2007 16:52 GMT
> Funny they didn't mention the Panamanians who died from poisoned medicines
> shipped from China. That was a pretty big tragedy, too.
>
> Joyce

Possibly because a Chinese court only has jurisdiction over
things that happen in China?
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 30 May 2007 18:41 GMT
> > Funny they didn't mention the Panamanians who died from poisoned medicines
> > shipped from China. That was a pretty big tragedy, too.
> >
> > Joyce

> Possibly because a Chinese court only has jurisdiction over
> things that happen in China?

I just meant the article. They did mention the animal deaths from
tainted pet food.

Joyce
Aleks A.-Lessmann - 31 May 2007 20:35 GMT
>But if it also means they're really going to overhaul their food safety
>system, it might make a real difference. I'm sure nobody there is happy
>that their reputation is in the toilet world-wide.

It's gonna be a cold day in hell when that happens. The Chinese
Government does not care about public opinion, it does only care about
money. The only way to change the situation is to just not buy anything
made in china - which is incredibly difficult, as the sweatshops and
forced labour of political prisoners result in incredibly cheap
production costs.

Regards
Aleks
jofirey - 31 May 2007 21:35 GMT
>>But if it also means they're really going to overhaul their food safety
>>system, it might make a real difference. I'm sure nobody there is happy
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> forced labour of political prisoners result in incredibly cheap
> production costs.

Maybe they care about safety and maybe they don't, but if they care about
money and world wide panic over pets being killed by products from China
isn't good for trade.

There does come a point when you can't sell anything no mater the  price.

Jo
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 31 May 2007 22:25 GMT
> Maybe they care about safety and maybe they don't, but if they
> care about money and world wide panic over pets being killed by
> products from China isn't good for trade.

Unfortunately, a lot of businesses don't care enough about safety,
either. As Yowie pointed out a while ago, the world's economy is
dependent on China's cheap prices (other countries', too, I would
imagine), made possible by the oppressive working conditions of
the people who make the products.

> There does come a point when you can't sell anything no mater
> the  price.

It will have to hurt the businesses that do business with China,
before they'd be willing to stop. But how do we know who those
businesses are? Among the importers, manufacturers, packaging
companies, distributors and retailers, the chain of transactions
could be several layers deep from the source to your home. Many
products that are manufactured domestically still contain foreign
ingredients, often including those from China. It's a complicated
maze... so even if consumers were truly fed up enough to boycott
Chinese imports, how would they know what to boycott? It would
have to be almost everything!

Joyce
jmcquown - 01 Jun 2007 13:31 GMT
>  > Maybe they care about safety and maybe they don't, but if they
>  > care about money and world wide panic over pets being killed by
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> Joyce

Which means we'd pretty much have to go back to the turn of the 20th century
or even further :)  Make all our own clothes; heck, weave our own cloth.
China silk was highly prized in Victorian days but hey, who knows what those
silworms were up to?  It's not really feasible to avoid all things
containing imported ingredients.

After the monkfish recall I threw out the tilapia (fish) fillets in my
freezer because they state on the package "product of china".  And I won't
be buying any more.  Too bad, because they are inexpensive and tasty but now
I have no idea what I'd really been buying.  Time to go back to good old
American farm-raised catfish fillets, which is okay because I like catfish,
too.  I was merely buying the tilapia due to cost.

Jill
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 31 May 2007 21:36 GMT
>> But if it also means they're really going to overhaul their food safety
>> system, it might make a real difference. I'm sure nobody there is happy
>> that their reputation is in the toilet world-wide.

> It's gonna be a cold day in hell when that happens. The Chinese
> Government does not care about public opinion, it does only care about
> money. The only way to change the situation is to just not buy anything
> made in china - which is incredibly difficult, as the sweatshops and
> forced labour of political prisoners result in incredibly cheap
> production costs.

<sigh...> I know you're right. :(

Joyce
Victor Martinez - 01 Jun 2007 00:26 GMT
> money. The only way to change the situation is to just not buy anything
> made in china - which is incredibly difficult, as the sweatshops and

We've decided to start looking at the label and pass on *anything* made
in China.

Signature

Victor M. Martinez
Owned and operated by the Fantastic Seven (TM)
Send your spam here: uce@ftc.gov
Email me here: pistorLITTER@BOXaustin.rr.com

jofirey - 01 Jun 2007 04:15 GMT
>> money. The only way to change the situation is to just not buy anything
>> made in china - which is incredibly difficult, as the sweatshops and
>
> We've decided to start looking at the label and pass on *anything* made in
> China.

I think we will also start seeing more country of origin, especially on
consumables in the future it this scare doesn't settle down pretty fast.

Kind of like the no trans fat or no cholesterol labels.  I don't think that
many people have problems with imported whole foods when they know where
they come from.   I very much enjoy my imported fruits and vegetables.  And
no one is getting between me and my Mexican beer, tequila and coffee.  Jake
likes his shrimp.  But for mixed up things with lots of ingredients, I'd pay
the few cents for all USA origin.  Especially if no one is testing this
stuff before we eat it.

Jo
Ketzl's Dad - 01 Jun 2007 04:50 GMT
>>> money. The only way to change the situation is to just not buy anything
>>> made in china - which is incredibly difficult, as the sweatshops and
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Jo

I don't know how many of you monitor the FDA recalls web site, but every few
days lately there's some comestible product being recalled for one reason or
another and most of the time the country of origin is China. I never noticed
it before, or not that often, but since the pet food scare it seems to be
popping up all the time.

The current recall has to do with undeclared sulfites in a product that
sounds like it's mostly used by herbalists (I'm not familiar with Dried Lily
Bulb, nor am I allergic to sulfites) but it's just another indication of
terrible and unethical practices being rampant in that country.

Signature

Joey DoWop Dee
Remember: It is To Laugh

jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 01 Jun 2007 05:39 GMT
> I don't know how many of you monitor the FDA recalls web site, but every few
> days lately there's some comestible product being recalled for one reason or
> another and most of the time the country of origin is China. I never noticed
> it before, or not that often, but since the pet food scare it seems to be
> popping up all the time.

I think it's like when you learn a new word, and suddenly you're seeing
it everywhere. The word was most likely there before, you just didn't
notice it.

The FDA was sleeping peacefully on the job. All of a sudden, all these
pets started dying. Once they figured out what happened, they started
to pay more attention to imported shipments, and holy s**t, toxins were
all over the place! But I'll bet they were there before. People mysteriously
got sick, or maybe even died, and nobody tied it to specific foods. It
took death on a big scale - happened to be non-humans in this case - to
wake up our government's food safety agency. Now they can't stop finding
disgusting things in our food, medicines, and toiletries, etc.

Joyce
Sherry - 01 Jun 2007 05:10 GMT
> > money. The only way to change the situation is to just not buy anything
> > made in china - which is incredibly difficult, as the sweatshops and
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Send your spam here: u...@ftc.gov
> Email me here: pistorLIT...@BOXaustin.rr.com

Oh yes, we decided that also. What disturbs me though, is how
misleading are labels anyway? Many products
are imported from China, but packaged & distributed by the US. Like
the pet food--nowhere on it did it say
"ingredients imported from China". I wish the labeling were more
specific that way.

Sherry
Sherry - 30 May 2007 11:58 GMT
> >> Death penalty for China official:
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> --
> Marina, Miranda and Caliban. In loving memory of Frank and Nikki.- Hide quoted text -

I would too, Marina. It sounds like that may be what ultimately
happens.

Sherry
Victor Martinez - 30 May 2007 13:46 GMT
> Yes, those babies got me too. It seems he caused a lot of misery in his
> own country, as well as elsewhere. I would prefer it if his sentence
> would be changed to life imprisonment, though.

Given China's "justice system", I don't even think this guy is
responsible for everything. Can you say scapegoat?

Signature

Victor M. Martinez
Owned and operated by the Fantastic Seven (TM)
Send your spam here: uce@ftc.gov
Email me here: pistorLITTER@BOXaustin.rr.com

Daniel Mahoney - 30 May 2007 14:24 GMT
>> Yes, those babies got me too. It seems he caused a lot of misery in his
>> own country, as well as elsewhere. I would prefer it if his sentence
>> would be changed to life imprisonment, though.
>
> Given China's "justice system", I don't even think this guy is
> responsible for everything. Can you say scapegoat?

That's what I was thinking too. I can't question that he is/was corrupt;
that's a rampant problem in China. But I doubt he is the only one to blame
for the deaths. He's just the one who was selected to pay the price.
Adrian A - 30 May 2007 17:51 GMT
>> Yes, those babies got me too. It seems he caused a lot of misery in
>> his own country, as well as elsewhere. I would prefer it if his
>> sentence would be changed to life imprisonment, though.
>
> Given China's "justice system", I don't even think this guy is
> responsible for everything. Can you say scapegoat?

That's exactly what I was thinking.
Signature

Adrian (Owned by Snoopy and Bagheera)
Cats leave pawprints on your heart.
http://community.webshots.com/user/clowderuk

Marina - 30 May 2007 18:16 GMT
> Given China's "justice system", I don't even think this guy is
> responsible for everything. Can you say scapegoat?

The article did say several other people are under suspicion, but in
cases like this, I guess we will never know how wide-spread the
corruption has actually been. It's pretty safe to say that not everyone
who has been a party in this will be prosecuted.

Signature

Marina, Miranda and Caliban. In loving memory of Frank and Nikki.

EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) - 30 May 2007 21:48 GMT
>> Given China's "justice system", I don't even think this guy is
>> responsible for everything. Can you say scapegoat?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> corruption has actually been. It's pretty safe to say that not everyone
> who has been a party in this will be prosecuted.

Like the U.S. - given the scandals associated with the
current administration, IMO we should impeach the whole
gang, starting with Cheney and Bush, and continuing on
through a large proprtion of Bush's appointees, but we all
know that's not going to happen!
annoyed@net.spammers - 31 May 2007 02:33 GMT
>>> Given China's "justice system", I don't even think this guy is
>>> responsible for everything. Can you say scapegoat?
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>through a large proprtion of Bush's appointees, but we all
>know that's not going to happen!

If you're going to do that, don't forget to impeach Feinstein, Boxer,
Pelosi, Hillary Clinton, Chuckie Schmuckie Schumer, Ted "Hic!" Kennedy,
Robert "KKK" Byrd, etc.
Signature

annoyed@net.spammers
Craig, Kathi & "Cat Five" the tabby girl

Martha - 30 May 2007 21:02 GMT
> > Yes, those babies got me too. It seems he caused a lot of misery in his
> > own country, as well as elsewhere. I would prefer it if his sentence
> > would be changed to life imprisonment, though.
>
> Given China's "justice system", I don't even think this guy is
> responsible for everything. Can you say scapegoat?

Well, they have a saying which is approximately "cut off the head of the
chicken, and there will be no problem from all else."

In other words, punish the head of whatever, and don't bother about the
underlings.

That's what happened after Mao died too.

Martha
EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) - 30 May 2007 16:50 GMT
>>> Death penalty for China official:
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> own country, as well as elsewhere. I would prefer it if his sentence
> would be changed to life imprisonment, though.

I never have understood why that is considered preferable to
the death penalty!  (Except, of course, in cases where the
condemned person is innocent.)  To be locked up for the rest
of one's life seems far more terrible to me than dying a bit
sooner than in the normal course of nature.
mlbriggs - 30 May 2007 05:49 GMT
>> Death penalty for China official:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Sherry

Just think how many may have been unreported.   MLB
EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) - 30 May 2007 16:43 GMT
> Death penalty for China official:
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/6699441.stm

Wow!  The Chinese don't fool around, do they?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.