Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / Cat Anecdotes / May 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

The Other Shoe Has Dropped

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Ginger-lyn - 17 May 2007 00:25 GMT
Some of y'all may recall that among my myriads of difficulty was that
the landlord was selling the apartment building.  He did, and after a
couple of months with nothing from the new landlord (not even an
introductory note), today in the mail I got a lease.

Now, I have been on month-to-month for *years*.  Why should I have to
sign a lease?  And it is the most restrictive, punitive to tenants lease
I have ever read.

And the worst part?  He requires a $250 pet deposit, and $10 extra rent
a month *for each pet*!

If I wasn't on pain meds, I'd get drunk tonight.  I don't know what I am
going to do :-(

Ginger-lyn
in tears
jmcquown - 17 May 2007 00:34 GMT
> Some of y'all may recall that among my myriads of difficulty was that
> the landlord was selling the apartment building.  He did, and after a
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> Ginger-lyn
> in tears

Oh lord.  Purrs for your nerves and for an easy and quick solution to this
problem are on the way.

Jill
Ginger-lyn - 19 May 2007 21:18 GMT
> Oh lord.  Purrs for your nerves and for an easy and quick solution to this
> problem are on the way.
>
> Jill

Thank you, Jill.

Ginger-lyn
Finding out just how very difficult it is to type with Trill under my
right arm and Cosmo sitting next to my left arm.
Matthew - 17 May 2007 00:35 GMT
> Some of y'all may recall that among my myriads of difficulty was that the
> landlord was selling the apartment building.  He did, and after a couple
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> Ginger-lyn
> in tears

Ginger You may want to review the tenant land lord laws in your area.  Also
since you are month to month you many want to look for a new place.  I am
sorry you are going thru this.
Ginger-lyn - 19 May 2007 21:23 GMT
> Ginger You may want to review the tenant land lord laws in your area.  Also
> since you are month to month you many want to look for a new place.  I am
> sorry you are going thru this.

Thank you,. Matthew.  The tenant-landlord laws are pretty much tilted
almost exclusively toward the landlords.  :-(
There used to be a Tenant's Union, but they disbanded quite some time ago.

I dread the idea of looking for another place.  I'd need a miracle to
find one that rents for as reasonable a rate as this one, has two
bedrooms, a basement, etc.  I've lived here 22 years; it long ago quit
being an apartment; it's my home.

Ginger-lyn
Matthew - 19 May 2007 21:58 GMT
>> Ginger You may want to review the tenant land lord laws in your area.
>> Also since you are month to month you many want to look for a new place.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Ginger-lyn

Home is where the heart is.  I know what you are saying.  I wish I knew a
way to help.   I am going to send you a  email to find out where you are in
the world so you don't have to make it public unless you want to and maybe I
can find something online for you or know someone that can lead you in the
right direction if that is ok
Ginger-lyn - 20 May 2007 21:40 GMT
>>> Ginger You may want to review the tenant land lord laws in your area.
>>> Also since you are month to month you many want to look for a new place.
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> can find something online for you or know someone that can lead you in the
> right direction if that is ok

Sure -- I can use any help I can get.

ty,

Ginger-lyn
Matthew - 21 May 2007 04:21 GMT
>>>> Ginger You may want to review the tenant land lord laws in your area.
>>>> Also since you are month to month you many want to look for a new
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> Ginger-lyn

I sent you an email Did you get it ???
Ginger-lyn - 23 May 2007 18:43 GMT
> I sent you an email Did you get it ???

Nope -- unless you're Russian or selling something I don't want or need ;-)

I have my address slightly munged -- did you use the "reply-to" address?

Otherwise, the Black Hole in the Internet probably ate it ;-)

Ginger-lyn
Matthew - 23 May 2007 18:57 GMT
I will resend it when I get home later

>> I sent you an email Did you get it ???
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Ginger-lyn
Jack Campin - bogus address - 17 May 2007 00:51 GMT
> Some of y'all may recall that among my myriads of difficulty was that
> the landlord was selling the apartment building.  He did, and after a
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> And the worst part?  He requires a $250 pet deposit, and $10 extra rent
> a month *for each pet*!

Maybe you don't have to sign it.  Over here sitting tenants have rights
that can't be nullified by a change of ownership, there may be something
like that where you are.  Is there a citizens' advice bureau (what we
call it - a public agency to tell people what their rights are) in your
area?

Meanwhile, *don't* sign it.

Requiring a new deposit from a sitting tenant would be a criminal
offence here.  It's called extortion.

==============  j-c  ======  @  ======  purr . demon . co . uk  ==============
Jack Campin:  11 Third St, Newtongrange EH22 4PU, Scotland | tel 0131 660 4760
<http://www.purr.demon.co.uk/jack/>   for CD-ROMs and free | fax 0870 0554 975
stuff: Scottish music, food intolerance, & Mac logic fonts | mob 07800 739 557
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 17 May 2007 01:34 GMT
> > Some of y'all may recall that among my myriads of difficulty was that
> > the landlord was selling the apartment building.  He did, and after a
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> > And the worst part?  He requires a $250 pet deposit, and $10 extra rent
> > a month *for each pet*!

> Maybe you don't have to sign it.  Over here sitting tenants have rights
> that can't be nullified by a change of ownership, there may be something
> like that where you are.  Is there a citizens' advice bureau (what we
> call it - a public agency to tell people what their rights are) in your
> area?

This goes by city in the US. Some cities - getting fewer by the year -
have what we call "rent control", a set of restrictions on landlords
over rent increases, evictions, etc. In cities with rent control, there
is an official rent control board, where she could address complaints
such as this. But in those cities without it (which is the vast majority),
there may be a grass-roots organization (ie, not a gov't agency) that
has researched local tenancy laws and can advise tenants of their rights.
Since Ginger-Lyn lives in a city, there is likely some sort tenants-
advocacy group there, but I don't know.

I think it's good advice, whatever it's called. :) Ginger-Lyn, do you
have any advocates you can ask about your rights? This seems extremely
unfair.

Joyce
Kreisleriana - 17 May 2007 14:36 GMT
> > > Some of y'all may recall that among my myriads of difficulty was that
> > > the landlord was selling the apartment building.  He did, and after a
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>have any advocates you can ask about your rights? This seems extremely
>unfair.

Piggybacking here because this is just what I was going to say.  Purrs
for your nerves and a quick solution.

>Joyce

Theresa
Stinky Pictures: http://community.webshots.com/album/125591586JWEFwh

Make Levees, Not War
Ginger-lyn - 19 May 2007 21:36 GMT
>>>> Some of y'all may recall that among my myriads of difficulty was that
>>>> the landlord was selling the apartment building.  He did, and after a
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> Piggybacking here because this is just what I was going to say.  Purrs
> for your nerves and a quick solution.

Thank you, Joyce.  Purrs are always welcome, especially now.

Ginger-lyn

>> Joyce
>
> Theresa
> Stinky Pictures: http://community.webshots.com/album/125591586JWEFwh
>
> Make Levees, Not War
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 19 May 2007 22:28 GMT
>> Piggybacking here because this is just what I was going to say.  Purrs
>> for your nerves and a quick solution.

> Thank you, Joyce.  Purrs are always welcome, especially now.

Actually, the piggyback purrs were from Theresa (technically, from
Stinky and Dante :)). My gang is purring too, though. And Roxy sends
some snores from the top of my monitor.

Joyce
Ginger-lyn - 20 May 2007 21:44 GMT
>  > Kreisleriana wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Joyce

Oops.  Shows how attentive I am right now.  Thanks for pointing that
out, and for the purrs, and thanks to Theresa, too.

Ginger-lyn
Sherry - 17 May 2007 22:56 GMT
On May 16, 7:34 pm, jXwXeXrXmXoX...@sonic.net wrote:

>  > > Some of y'all may recall that among my myriads of difficulty was that
>  > > the landlord was selling the apartment building.  He did, and after a
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> Joyce

There should be two separate brochures, "Tenants Rights" and
"Landlord's Rights" available. You
just call and ask for them and they mail them to you. I don't remember
which agency it was,
but it came from the state capitol. I bet that info is available
online too.
Good, longterm tenants should be taken care of by the landlord,
because they don't come
along every day. Her landlord should know this. Maybe if Gingerlyn
just had a good talk with him
there could be some compromise or he'd make an exception. It would be
worth a try.

Sherry
Ginger-lyn - 19 May 2007 21:42 GMT
> On May 16, 7:34 pm, jXwXeXrXmXoX...@sonic.net wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
>
> Sherry

Thanks, Sherry.

I wish this guy would realize that someone like me *doesn't* come along
every day.  I've interviewed prospective tenants, and sometimes it was a
pretty pitiful bunch.  Okay, *often* it was pretty pitiful.

Right now, I can't talk to him.  I would end up screaming at him and
crying, which I don't want to do.  I have until June 15th to sign the
lease.  And I hate to say it, but he comes across as very arrogant.  I
also think he's used to dealing with more high-end rental places, and
does not have a clue how to deal with those of us who live here, in a
very old building (around 100 years oldO) and where our relations with
landlords have mostly been very laid back.  there's another clause that
says curtains must have a neutral color.  OMG -- in this neighborhood?
I think he is a fool, and I hope he realizes this before 4 groups of
good tenants move.

Ginger-lyn
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 19 May 2007 22:18 GMT
> does not have a clue how to deal with those of us who live here, in a
> very old building (around 100 years oldO) and where our relations with
> landlords have mostly been very laid back.  there's another clause that
> says curtains must have a neutral color.  OMG -- in this neighborhood?

Next he'll be circulating a CC&R. :)

> I think he is a fool, and I hope he realizes this before 4 groups of
> good tenants move.

Any possibility you all could work together on this?

Joyce
Ginger-lyn - 20 May 2007 21:46 GMT
>  > does not have a clue how to deal with those of us who live here, in a
>  > very old building (around 100 years oldO) and where our relations with
>  > landlords have mostly been very laid back.  there's another clause that
>  > says curtains must have a neutral color.  OMG -- in this neighborhood?
>
> Next he'll be circulating a CC&R. :)

Okay -- what's a CC&R?  You got me on that one.

>  > I think he is a fool, and I hope he realizes this before 4 groups of
>  > good tenants move.
>
> Any possibility you all could work together on this?
>
> Joyce

Possibly 3 of the four of us could (the 4th is an animal abuser).

Ginger-lyn
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 20 May 2007 22:47 GMT
>>> there's another clause that
>>> says curtains must have a neutral color.  OMG -- in this neighborhood?

>> Next he'll be circulating a CC&R. :)

> Okay -- what's a CC&R?  You got me on that one.

That was a joke. Some very upscale Homeowners Associations and gated
communities have sets of rules that people have to follow regarding
the color of the house, what you can have on your lawn, how/where to
park your car, etc. It stands for something like "Commitments
<something> and Rules" - I'm not sure, exactly. Maybe someone else
knows?

>> Any possibility you all could work together on this?

> Possibly 3 of the four of us could (the 4th is an animal abuser).

Yuck. I guess you can leave them out!

Joyce
jmcquown - 21 May 2007 09:30 GMT
>  > jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> <something> and Rules" - I'm not sure, exactly. Maybe someone else
> knows?

If you have enough money the Homeowner's Association will pretty much ignore
their "rules".  Where my parents live there was (allegedly) a very strict
code regarding what colour your house could be, etc.  All the homes were
tastefully painted in shades of brown and green to blend in with the native
flora and fauna.  That is, until some mega-millionaires decided to build a
huge PINK monstrosity overlooking the intracoastal waterway.  Apparently if
you have enough money to spend the Homeowner's Association goes on an
extended vacation!

Jill
Matthew - 21 May 2007 11:03 GMT
>>  > jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
> Jill

I would refuse to live where a home owners association was
They have tried that where I live a group purchased a lot of the land and
some vacant homes in my neighborhood.  They started a home owners unit.
they sent out notices to all the neighborhood about 20 other homes and told
us what problems they had at our house and if we did not fix them they would
take us to court.  They wanted to gate off a public road and make it
private.
The county told them no way about the road and a group of lawyers that live
in the neighborhood  showed them the light of the law and a lawsuit and
injunction to prevent them from future actions.
Kathy - 21 May 2007 16:47 GMT
>  I would refuse to live where a home owners association was
> They have tried that where I live a group purchased a lot of the land and
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> in the neighborhood  showed them the light of the law and a lawsuit and
> injunction to prevent them from future actions.

If my neighborhood had an association like that we'd be booted right
out. We have no tidy little landscaping - we had most of the shrubs
outside removed. Now one ginormous wild rose is in front of the house
and only gets trimmed back if my bi-polar daughter comes up and gets
into a serious manic period. Then she whacks it back to a normal looking
bush and it repeats the overgrowth cycle... We also have, gasp,
dandelions and wild violets (the latter of which I'm trying to encourage
to take over the lawn. :D) The steps are broken and the siding is
aluminum and dirty as sin. And, God knows what they'd do if the saw the
inside. :-) I'm sure some folks would think of my house as an enormous
trailer, from one of those southern stereotype trailer parks - even
though it's a 2-story colonial in New Jersey. LOL... I wish you the best
of luck. BTW, the SSDI may take a lawyer's help,Ginger-lyn ...
Lots of purrs and prayers,
Kathy
jmcquown - 23 May 2007 23:26 GMT
>>>  > jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net wrote:
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
> that live in the neighborhood  showed them the light of the law and a
> lawsuit and injunction to prevent them from future actions.

I worked with a woman who lived in a "gated community" with a homeowners
association.  Someone on her street painted their house an unapproved shade
of paint.  The neighborhood association hired a painting contractor, had his
house repainted while he was at work then sent him a bill for $1000.  Excuse
me?!
sam - 22 May 2007 03:08 GMT
>  > jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> <something> and Rules" - I'm not sure, exactly. Maybe someone else
> knows?
Covenants, maybe?

Sam, closely supervised by Mistletoe
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 22 May 2007 05:16 GMT
>> It stands for something like "Commitments
>> <something> and Rules" - I'm not sure, exactly. Maybe someone else
>> knows?

> Covenants, maybe?

That sounds right, yeah.

Joyce
jmcquown - 21 May 2007 09:25 GMT
>> On May 16, 7:34 pm, jXwXeXrXmXoX...@sonic.net wrote:
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>>>  landlord (not even an > > introductory note), today in the mail I
>>>  got a lease. > > Now, I have been on month-to-month for *years*.

>>>  > Maybe you don't have to sign it.  Over here sitting tenants have
>>>  rights > that can't be nullified by a change of ownership, there
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
> along every day.  I've interviewed prospective tenants, and sometimes
> it was a pretty pitiful bunch.  Okay, *often* it was pretty pitiful.

John is a landlord and I can't begin to describe how many awful tenants he's
had to deal with!  Good, stable long-term renters are very hard to find.  He
finally sold one of the (Victorian era) houses he had 3 apartments in.  He
still owns one but is very anxious to get out of the land-lord business!
He'd *kill* (well not really!) for a tenant like GL!

> there's another clause that says curtains must have a neutral color.
OMG -- >in this
> neighborhood? I think he is a fool, and I hope he realizes this
> before 4 groups of good tenants move.

So now he's trying to pull a "housing association" thing on the decor of the
apartments?  If he wants to go that far he should supply the window
treatments himself!

Jill
Ginger-lyn - 19 May 2007 21:34 GMT
>  > > Some of y'all may recall that among my myriads of difficulty was that
>  > > the landlord was selling the apartment building.  He did, and after a
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> Joyce
Nope -- they disbanded years ago.  One of the members is now my tax
person, so maybe she's kept up on things and still knows.  I got the
brochure on tenant's rights at ComFest a couple of years ago, skimmed
through it, and it looked very unfairly tilted almost exclusively to the
landlord's rights, not the tenant's.  There is no rent control here -- I
really wish there was.

Ginger-lyn
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 19 May 2007 22:13 GMT
> Nope -- they disbanded years ago.  One of the members is now my tax
> person, so maybe she's kept up on things and still knows.  I got the
> brochure on tenant's rights at ComFest a couple of years ago, skimmed
> through it, and it looked very unfairly tilted almost exclusively to the
> landlord's rights, not the tenant's.  There is no rent control here -- I
> really wish there was.

That sounds like the situation in a lot of places. :(  I'm sorry
to hear it. Maybe your tax person can advise you, though. It does
sound like a really tough situation.

Purrs,
Joyce
EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) - 18 May 2007 00:14 GMT
>>Some of y'all may recall that among my myriads of difficulty was that
>>the landlord was selling the apartment building.  He did, and after a
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> Requiring a new deposit from a sitting tenant would be a criminal
> offence here.  It's called extortion.

Well of course, each state (and even each city) can have its
own rules, here in the U.S.  Until I lived here, I would
have said a sitting tenant was only required to pay the
regular rent increases - but then I always rented where the
owner/landlord lived in the building, or in the house
next-door.  However, as those of you who've read my tale of
woe in another thread know, whatever landords can legally
demand of TENANTS, they are under NO restriction when it
comes to discontinuing previously supplied amenties
(concierge service, etc.) no matter how long they have been
supplying them.  (Not unless they are actually part of the
lease - and previous owners were clever enough to list them
in a separate document given to new tenants, nothing about
them appeared in the lease itself.)

> ==============  j-c  ======  @  ======  purr . demon . co . uk  ==============
> Jack Campin:  11 Third St, Newtongrange EH22 4PU, Scotland | tel 0131 660 4760
> <http://www.purr.demon.co.uk/jack/>   for CD-ROMs and free | fax 0870 0554 975
> stuff: Scottish music, food intolerance, & Mac logic fonts | mob 07800 739 557
Ginger-lyn - 19 May 2007 21:31 GMT
> Maybe you don't have to sign it.  Over here sitting tenants have rights
> that can't be nullified by a change of ownership, there may be something
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> <http://www.purr.demon.co.uk/jack/>   for CD-ROMs and free | fax 0870 0554 975
> stuff: Scottish music, food intolerance, & Mac logic fonts | mob 07800 739 557

I am not going to sign it right no matter what.  Sadly, here in the
States (and can vary state by state) there is very little in the
tenant's favor.  Here, a landlord can pretty much set things the way
he/she wants them, tenant be damned.

we had a Tenant's Union years ago, but they disbanded.

I wish it was that way here.  But it isn't.

Maybe I should move to England . . . .

Ginger-lyn
Adrian A - 19 May 2007 22:12 GMT
>> Maybe you don't have to sign it.  Over here sitting tenants have
>> rights
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
> Ginger-lyn

The more I read of problems like yours, the more glad I am to live in
England. Continuing purrs that things work out for you.
Signature

Adrian (Owned by Snoopy and Bagheera)
Cats leave pawprints on your heart.
http://community.webshots.com/user/clowderuk

Christina Websell - 17 May 2007 00:55 GMT
> Some of y'all may recall that among my myriads of difficulty was that the
> landlord was selling the apartment building.  He did, and after a couple
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> If I wasn't on pain meds, I'd get drunk tonight.  I don't know what I am
> going to do :-(

How will he know how many pets you have?  Can he come into your house and
check?  If not, in your situation I would lie.  Tell him you have two cats.
Or move if you can.
This is when I am glad I own my house.
Try not to panic.  Is the 250 a one off or every month?

Tweed
jmcquown - 17 May 2007 12:37 GMT
>> Some of y'all may recall that among my myriads of difficulty was
>> that the landlord was selling the apartment building.  He did, and
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Tweed

The $250 is a one time thing, then $10 per month per cat (and there is often
a limit regarding the number of cats).  And yes, landlords can enter your
dwelling as can any of their maintenance staff.

Jill
Cheryl Perkins - 17 May 2007 13:23 GMT
> The $250 is a one time thing, then $10 per month per cat (and there is often
> a limit regarding the number of cats).  And yes, landlords can enter your
> dwelling as can any of their maintenance staff.

This is an example of something that varies from place to place - which is
why she should consult whichever local authority or non-profit group
advises tenants on what the local law is.

Under *my* local law, the right of a landlord (never mind maintenance
staff!) to enter rented premises is extremely limited - there must be an
emergency, or the tenant must have abandoned the property, or notice of
termination must have been given, with both reasonable notice given to the
tenant (4-24 hours, depending on the situation) and entry made at a
reasonable hour to show the property to a new tenant or buyer.

We also don't often seem to have pet deposits or pet rent, or didn't, last
time I was looking for a place to rent. Landlords seemed to either forbid
pets altogether or allow them without additional fees. Sometimes, they
limited the kind of pet by size or type or number.

Housing rules and customs seem to vary considerably by region.
Signature

Cheryl

jmcquown - 17 May 2007 14:49 GMT
>> The $250 is a one time thing, then $10 per month per cat (and there
>> is often a limit regarding the number of cats).  And yes, landlords
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> which is why she should consult whichever local authority or
> non-profit group advises tenants on what the local law is.

Good point, although where I live the landlord must *always* have a current
key.  Granted, they can't come barging in in the middle of the night just
because they feel like it but they must be able to access the premises.

My last apartment was upstairs (never again! LOL).  The adjoining neighbors
had gone away for the weekend or something when the tenants below them
complained about water leaking through their ceiling.  The landlord *had* to
be able to get in without their prior permission to ascertain what the
problem was in order to have it repaired.

> Under *my* local law, the right of a landlord (never mind maintenance
> staff!) to enter rented premises is extremely limited - there must be
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> and entry made at a reasonable hour to show the property to a new
> tenant or buyer.

Fortunately the apartment where I live is usually good about sending notices
of routine scheduled maintenance.  However, every three months or so the
maintenance guy will knock on the door to change the heating/air conditioner
filter and replace the smoke alarm batteries and test the fire extinguisher
without any notice.  Only more complex maintenance requires advance notice.
When I was working I'd often come home to find a pink "receipt" sitting on
my kitchen counter outlining the work they'd done in my absence.

> We also don't often seem to have pet deposits or pet rent, or didn't,
> last time I was looking for a place to rent. Landlords seemed to
> either forbid pets altogether or allow them without additional fees.
> Sometimes, they limited the kind of pet by size or type or number.

Here IF they allow pets there is always a pet deposit but not always a
monthly pet rent in addition.  The deposit covers potential damage by pets
and is non-refundable in all cases.

> Housing rules and customs seem to vary considerably by region.

This is true.  And I agree Ginger-Lyn should find out what the local laws
are.  Having said that, she's apparently been very lucky with her
month-to-month tenancy with her prior landlord.  Where I live, if you go
month-to-month the landlord has every right to raise the rent *every single
month* the tenant stays there.  For this reason alone (again, where I live)
it only makes good sense to sign a 6 or 12 month lease.

I don't like the fact that this new landlord is suddenly requiring a pet
deposit.  It's not like he went through and replaced all the carpeting,
flooring, etc. and now has to worry about damages to new items he put in
place.

Jill
Ginger-lyn - 19 May 2007 21:25 GMT
>> Some of y'all may recall that among my myriads of difficulty was that the
>> landlord was selling the apartment building.  He did, and after a couple
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Tweed

He toured the building before he bought it, so he already knows I have 9
cats; with that many, I don't think there is any way I can lie (plus I
tend not to do it because I'm very bad at it -- lol).

The 250 is a one-time fee.

Ginger-lyn
Rhonda - 20 May 2007 17:24 GMT
>> How will he know how many pets you have?  Can he come into your house
>> and check?  If not, in your situation I would lie.  Tell him you have
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Ginger-lyn

If he already knew you were there with 9 cats and set a per-animal rent,
it sounds like he wants you to leave (maybe not you -- but your cats.) I
think you have to convince him and show him that your cats are not a
problem. Can someone else talk to him for you if you cannot? Maybe offer
another inspection?

Rhonda
Ginger-lyn - 20 May 2007 21:43 GMT
>>> How will he know how many pets you have?  Can he come into your house
>>> and check?  If not, in your situation I would lie.  Tell him you have
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Rhonda

That's what I'm afraid of.  I have the lowest rent of the four units in
the building.  He's upping the rent no matter what, but it would still
be less than everyone else's.

I am going to try my two ex-landlords, but I don't think they can do much.

Another inspection would be a *bad* idea right now -- Since the hip
fracture, I have not been able to do much, and the place is a mess.

Ginger-lyn
Christina Websell - 17 May 2007 19:18 GMT
> Some of y'all may recall that among my myriads of difficulty was that the
> landlord was selling the apartment building.  He did, and after a couple
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> If I wasn't on pain meds, I'd get drunk tonight.  I don't know what I am
> going to do :-(

I know I've replied in this thread already but your situation is worrying me
and I've been thinking.
Is there such a thing as housing provided by the local council, authority or
whatever you call it in the USA?  rather than private landlords?
If so, could you apply for it?
Over here council and housing associations usually allow pets whereas
private landlords are much more stringent and often ban children too.
I've never heard of any sort of pet deposit or pet rent here. It sounds like
a rip-off to me.   A deposit is often required when moving in to a privately
rented property to cover any damage that might be done, but that applies to
everyone, not just pet owners.
I am livid on your behalf, Ginger-Lyn, you've had enough to put up with
recently without this.

Tweed
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 17 May 2007 20:31 GMT
> Is there such a thing as housing provided by the local council,
> authority or whatever you call it in the USA?  rather than private
> landlords? If so, could you apply for it?

There is subsidized housing here, yes. Often referred to as "the projects".
They have a terrible reputation for high crime, gangs, drugs, etc. I
don't know if all subsidized housing is like that (having been lucky
enough not to need it), but that's certainly the perception, as well as
the reality in many places. I think many people who have even a shred
of other options would take that over moving to the projects.

Ginger-Lyn, could you possibly get Section 8 housing? That's disability
funding (from the government) to pay the rent for an apartment in a
privately-owned building where the owner has agreed to it. They have
long waiting lists, but it might be worth seeing if you could start the
ball rolling. I don't know if you are officially on disability, though.
I know this is much harder to get in these draconian times! :(

> I've never heard of any sort of pet deposit or pet rent here. It
> sounds like a rip-off to me. A deposit is often required when moving
> in to a privately rented property to cover any damage that might be
> done, but that applies to everyone, not just pet owners.

I don't mind paying a pet deposit, myself. But then, the ones I've
been asked to pay were pretty reasonable, and were a one-time payment
(a "one-off" as you'd say :)). It was a small fraction of my monthly
rent, and it gave me some peace of mind that if my cats were to cause
any damage, it was taken care of by the pet deposit.

In fact, sometimes when I've been apartment-hunting, I've answered ads
that explicitly said "no pets", because I've learned that it really
means no *dogs*. If, after I said I had cats, they were still adamant
about that policy, I would offer to pay a pet deposit, which sometimes
worked.

Then again, I've never had to pay extra *monthly* rent for my pets,
and paying per pet is ridiculous. There should be one deposit (but
$250 sounds very high), and that's it.

Joyce
jmcquown - 17 May 2007 22:00 GMT
>  > Is there such a thing as housing provided by the local council,
>  > authority or whatever you call it in the USA?  rather than private
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> shred
> of other options would take that over moving to the projects.

In my area the subsidized housing is all located in parts of town where you
wouldn't want to visit without a gun, let alone live in!  This is backed up
by crime statistics shown on the local news all the time.  Note to visitors:
avoid the southwest Memphis area.

> Ginger-Lyn, could you possibly get Section 8 housing? That's
> disability funding (from the government) to pay the rent for an
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> though.
> I know this is much harder to get in these draconian times! :(

This is a good suggestion!  Of course, government red tape and all that but
still worth pursuing if GL meets the qualifications.

>  > I've never heard of any sort of pet deposit or pet rent here. It
>  > sounds like a rip-off to me. A deposit is often required when
>  moving > in to a privately rented property to cover any damage that
>  might be > done, but that applies to everyone, not just pet owners.

The pet rent situation was new to me when I shopped around to move in 1998.
Before I moved into this apartment community it was very rare to see an
additional monthly fee for pets.  Now it's very common.

> I don't mind paying a pet deposit, myself. But then, the ones I've
> been asked to pay were pretty reasonable, and were a one-time payment
> (a "one-off" as you'd say :)). It was a small fraction of my monthly
> rent, and it gave me some peace of mind that if my cats were to cause
> any damage, it was taken care of by the pet deposit.

I've never encountered a rental situation where some sort of pet deposit or
fee was not required.

> In fact, sometimes when I've been apartment-hunting, I've answered ads
> that explicitly said "no pets", because I've learned that it really
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> and paying per pet is ridiculous. There should be one deposit (but
> $250 sounds very high), and that's it.

I've seen apartments listed with pet deposits (or non-refundable fees, in
many cases, thanks again to Karen for pointing out the wording) as high as
$500!  Mine was very reasonable, $125.

Jill
Christina Websell - 17 May 2007 22:24 GMT
>>  > Is there such a thing as housing provided by the local council,
>>  > authority or whatever you call it in the USA?  rather than private
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> visitors:
> avoid the southwest Memphis area.

Hmm.  My idea was not such a good one then.  There are nice estates of
council houses here and I just thought it might be a possibility in the USA.
What a pity.

Tweed
jmcquown - 18 May 2007 00:15 GMT
>>>  > Is there such a thing as housing provided by the local council,
>>>  > authority or whatever you call it in the USA?  rather than
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> Tweed

Sometimes I *really* wish I lived where you do, Christina!

Jill
Christina Websell - 19 May 2007 23:07 GMT
>>>>  > Is there such a thing as housing provided by the local council,
>>>>  > authority or whatever you call it in the USA?  rather than
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> Sometimes I *really* wish I lived where you do, Christina!

Do you? I like it here.  Don't get me wrong, there are some really bad
places here too.  I've worked hard all my life so I don't have to live in
one of them.
Some say I am lucky to live where I do.  I am not lucky.  Lucky is if you
are given it on a plate. I spent all my early life working for it and now I
have it.  Safe environment for me, my kitties and my hens and duck.  Apart
from the foxes that is.
I once bought a bottle of wine and I put it down at the side of the porch
while I got my key out.  Totally forgot about it.  I remembered about two
weeks later "didn't I buy some wine?"  went outside and it was still there.

Tweed
Ginger-lyn - 19 May 2007 21:54 GMT
>>>  > Is there such a thing as housing provided by the local council,
>>>  > authority or whatever you call it in the USA?  rather than private
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> Tweed

Sure wish it was.

Ginger-lyn
still thinking about moving to England . . . .
Debra - 18 May 2007 01:19 GMT
>There is subsidized housing here, yes. Often referred to as "the projects".
>They have a terrible reputation for high crime, gangs, drugs, etc. I
>don't know if all subsidized housing is like that (having been lucky
>enough not to need it), but that's certainly the perception, as well as
>the reality in many places. I think many people who have even a shred
>of other options would take that over moving to the projects.

The rent on government subsidized housing is the same everywhere even
though the cost of living differs.  This makes them fairly useless in
low cost of living areas.  We have subsidized housing in my town, but
because we have a low cost of living here most people call those
buildings the high rent district.  The government charges $200-300
dollars more per month than local private landlords charge.  The
private owned places are bigger, and have less rules.
Debra in VA
See my quilts at
http://community.webshots.com/user/debplayshere
Ginger-lyn - 19 May 2007 21:53 GMT
>  > Is there such a thing as housing provided by the local council,
>  > authority or whatever you call it in the USA?  rather than private
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> ball rolling. I don't know if you are officially on disability, though.
> I know this is much harder to get in these draconian times! :(

Yes, it is.  I applied for SSDI (Social Security Disability Income for
non-USAers) in what, December 2005.  They turned me down, I took the
next step (whatever that was).  Then they wanted me to see a back doctor
in Springfield (a good maybe 40-50 miles from here).  I have no car.
It's scheduled for morning.  Pretty much all of friends work during the
day.  What was I supposed to do???  So I didn't go, and I also didn't
try a third time because I looked at all the paperwork the lawyers sent
me, and just felt like I could not deal with this anymore.  So I let it
drop.

>  > I've never heard of any sort of pet deposit or pet rent here. It
>  > sounds like a rip-off to me. A deposit is often required when moving
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> and paying per pet is ridiculous. There should be one deposit (but
> $250 sounds very high), and that's it.

I agree totally.

> Joyce
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 19 May 2007 22:26 GMT
> I applied for SSDI (Social Security Disability Income for
> non-USAers) in what, December 2005.  They turned me down, I took the
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> me, and just felt like I could not deal with this anymore.  So I let it
> drop.

Yes, they're counting on you letting it drop - they make it very
difficult for people to get to appointments and to deal with the
paperwork and legal bullsh*t, and this is all directed at a population
that is already debilitated by whatever medical issues they have.

I've always heard that they automatically turn you down the first
time, and that it takes 3 tries before you're even seriously
considered. (Kind of like converting to Judaism.* :)) A good friend
of mine was an SSI advocate many years ago, and she helped people
just like you, trying to get on SSI/SSDI and couldn't deal with all
the hurdles. I wonder if there's such a person in your area?

Joyce

* Traditionally, rabbis require a potential convert to ask 3 times
before they begin the process of conversion. This is to filter out
people who are doing it for less than serious reasons.
Ginger-lyn - 20 May 2007 21:50 GMT
e:

> Yes, they're counting on you letting it drop - they make it very
> difficult for people to get to appointments and to deal with the
> paperwork and legal bullsh*t, and this is all directed at a population
> that is already debilitated by whatever medical issues they have.

I know :-(

> I've always heard that they automatically turn you down the first
> time, and that it takes 3 tries before you're even seriously
> considered. (Kind of like converting to Judaism.* :)) A good friend
> of mine was an SSI advocate many years ago, and she helped people
> just like you, trying to get on SSI/SSDI and couldn't deal with all
> the hurdles. I wonder if there's such a person in your area?

I don't know if anything like that exists.  I can try to find out,
although here the advocate is usually your attorney.  I never even *met*
my attorney in this.

> Joyce
>
> * Traditionally, rabbis require a potential convert to ask 3 times
> before they begin the process of conversion. This is to filter out
> people who are doing it for less than serious reasons.

Yup, know about that.  Once worked for a rabbi  :-)

Ginger-lyn
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 20 May 2007 22:42 GMT
>> A good friend
>> of mine was an SSI advocate many years ago, and she helped people
>> just like you, trying to get on SSI/SSDI and couldn't deal with all
>> the hurdles. I wonder if there's such a person in your area?

> I don't know if anything like that exists.  I can try to find out,
> although here the advocate is usually your attorney.  I never even *met*
> my attorney in this.

My friend was a lawyer, but she worked for an agency. I'm not sure
what kind of agency it was, it could have been run by the state,
or the county, or maybe it was private non-profit. This was quite a
few years ago, around 1993 or so, and I've been out of touch with
this friend for quite some time, too, so I can't ask her.

But you might also look for advocacy agencies of one sort or another.
Maybe even a google search would help - even if you find something that's
not in your area, they might be able to refer you, or, since SS(D)I is
a federal program, maybe it wouldn't matter where you live and where
they are.

Joyce
jmcquown - 21 May 2007 09:37 GMT
>  > I applied for SSDI (Social Security Disability Income for
>  > non-USAers) in what, December 2005.  They turned me down, I took
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> paperwork and legal bullsh*t, and this is all directed at a population
> that is already debilitated by whatever medical issues they have.

Indeed.  They turned me down flat.  A psych eval (took all of 15 minutes and
mostly consisted of me trying to count backwards from 200 in increments of
7 - did I ever tell you I am terribly bad at math?) indicated I don't suffer
from depression or any sort of agorophobia.  (Never mind I rescheduled the
appointment twice because I couldn't get myself to leave the house.)  Oh,
and I have arthritis in my hands, yes, but apparently not bad enough to
prevent me from lifting 25 lbs.  Excuse me, I couldn't easily lift 25 lbs.
*before* I got arthritis!  The application process is a joke.

> I've always heard that they automatically turn you down the first
> time, and that it takes 3 tries before you're even seriously
> considered.
> Joyce

I may give it another shot or three :)

Jill
Ginger-lyn - 19 May 2007 21:47 GMT
>> Some of y'all may recall that among my myriads of difficulty was that the
>> landlord was selling the apartment building.  He did, and after a couple
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
> Tweed

Thank you {{{{{{Tweed}}}}}}.

As others have mentioned, there is Section 8 housing here (I think two
apartments buildings right near me are Section 8).  Problem is, I don't
think I qualify, plus there is a long list and a long waiting time to
get into them.  Not an option for me :-{

Ginger-lyn
Stormmee - 19 May 2007 11:01 GMT
I am sorry, Lee
> Some of y'all may recall that among my myriads of difficulty was that
> the landlord was selling the apartment building.  He did, and after a
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> Ginger-lyn
> in tears
Ginger-lyn - 19 May 2007 21:56 GMT
> I am sorry, Lee

Thank you, Lee.

>> Some of y'all may recall that among my myriads of difficulty was that
>> the landlord was selling the apartment building.  He did, and after a
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>> Ginger-lyn
>> in tears

Ginger-lyn
Still with a Trill, paws resting on keyboard and under my arm.
Ketzl's Dad - 19 May 2007 22:36 GMT
> Some of y'all may recall that among my myriads of difficulty was that
> the landlord was selling the apartment building.  He did, and after a
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> Ginger-lyn
> in tears

I know you're probably exhausting all the possibilities, but is there any way
you could be 'grandfathered' in, in your current situation? IOW, as long as
you stay and pay your rent and abide by other rules, you would be exempt from
the "new rules." Once you vacate, the next tenants would be obliged to adhere
to the new rules. Just a long shot, but there are circumstances even here in
New York City where sitting tenants have certain rights when a building is
sold.

Signature

Joey DoWop Dee
Remember: It is To Laugh

Ginger-lyn - 20 May 2007 21:52 GMT
> I know you're probably exhausting all the possibilities, but is there any way
> you could be 'grandfathered' in, in your current situation? IOW, as long as
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> New York City where sitting tenants have certain rights when a building is
> sold.

That's probably the first thing I'm going to do, and hope that he will
agree.  But I'm not holding my breath.

Ginger-lyn
polonca12000 - 23 May 2007 20:12 GMT
> Some of y'all may recall that among my myriads of difficulty was that
> the landlord was selling the apartment building.  He did, and after a
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> Ginger-lyn
> in tears

Lots and lots of purrs and best wishes for a solution,
Polonca and Soncek
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.