Thanks MMJ,
I think the letter does present the issues in a clear, succinct way. I
think we are fortunate that no known harm has happened to people yet,
maybe it's because at some level, even those driven by greed to
adulterate food draw the line at injuring other people. At some point
however, those who *want* to harm other people will be able to,
apparently with little chance of being caught.
I'm usually in the camp of "don't waste time/energy worrying about
things I can't control and that the media hype," but this situation
does give me pause. Another reason to try to stick to buying "whole"
foods, and avoid processed foods as much as possible.
I wish I knew the answer, because I don't think, ultimately, that more
inspections are feasible. The labeling law sounds like a good plan, to
let consumers decide whether they want to buy the imported food.
Happy Friday.
Caroline S.
> Not that I want to join those that are "fear mongering", but there was a
> letter to the editor in our local paper this morning - and I think the
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>
> -Cathy Moore, Bloomington
Sherry - 11 May 2007 16:24 GMT
> Thanks MMJ,
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> Happy Friday.
> Caroline S.
I feel the same way, Caroline. I pay attention, am careful to keep
updated
but I don't live in fear at all. I think this should give pause.
I generally hate conspiracy theory mongers, but even I had a fleeting
thought
that they *knew* about this, but maybe the thought was "it's only
animals."
I just found out that little more than 1% of the food we eat is
actually inspected. That's
apalling. I also find it ironic that we've spend *millions* and
millions on "Homeland
Security" but we don't inspect the food that comes from countries that
are well known
for compromising safety & quality for the sake of profit. Is it just
me or is something weird
about that?
I've heard the FDA is extremely underfunded and understaffed. IMO that
needs to be
corrected if it is true. Our little town got a grant from Homeland
Security so that
our little old lady who sits at the counter & takes our water bills
now sits behind
bulletproof glass. That's a joke, that is a total waste of government
funds.
Sherry
Karen - 12 May 2007 04:08 GMT
And why does it seem to me that they want to see people falling over in
their tracks before they consider it a danger to humans? Shoot,
impaired immune systems, cancers or even just plain old illness is
enough, IMO, to have more control over imports. I don't care if it just
makes your stomach upset, contaminated food is contaminated food and
with alarm signals like this going off something needs to be done.
Debra - 12 May 2007 17:20 GMT
>And why does it seem to me that they want to see people falling over in
>their tracks before they consider it a danger to humans? Shoot,
>impaired immune systems, cancers or even just plain old illness is
>enough, IMO, to have more control over imports. I don't care if it just
>makes your stomach upset, contaminated food is contaminated food and
>with alarm signals like this going off something needs to be done.
Same reason that small towns only install street lights at
intersections where deadly car accidents happen the most often.
Debra in VA
See my quilts at
http://community.webshots.com/user/debplayshere
Victor Martinez - 12 May 2007 05:58 GMT
> does give me pause. Another reason to try to stick to buying "whole"
> foods, and avoid processed foods as much as possible.
That's why we don't eat any processed foods, and we buy organic as much
as we can. Unfortunately, most people can't afford that. :(
> I wish I knew the answer, because I don't think, ultimately, that more
> inspections are feasible. The labeling law sounds like a good plan, to
> let consumers decide whether they want to buy the imported food.
Exactly! Inspections are doable, but expensive.

Signature
Victor M. Martinez
Owned and operated by the Fantastic Seven (TM)
Send your spam here: uce@ftc.gov
Email me here: pistorLITTER@BOXaustin.rr.com
EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) - 12 May 2007 19:07 GMT
>> does give me pause. Another reason to try to stick to buying "whole"
>> foods, and avoid processed foods as much as possible.
>
> That's why we don't eat any processed foods, and we buy organic as much
> as we can. Unfortunately, most people can't afford that. :(
And since "Organic" became the new buzz word, you have to
read the labels carefully on THAT, too! (Just because they
call it "organic" doesn't necessarily guarantee it's what
you and I consider "organic".)
Victor Martinez - 12 May 2007 20:08 GMT
> And since "Organic" became the new buzz word, you have to read the
> labels carefully on THAT, too! (Just because they call it "organic"
> doesn't necessarily guarantee it's what you and I consider "organic".)
True. We have a local farm where I get the absolute freshest produce
there is. Most of it was harvested either the day before or that same
morning! And it's most definitely organic, we know the owners. They also
have chickens that produce the best eggs ever!

Signature
Victor M. Martinez
Owned and operated by the Fantastic Seven (TM)
Send your spam here: uce@ftc.gov
Email me here: pistorLITTER@BOXaustin.rr.com
> Not that I want to join those that are "fear mongering", but there was a
> letter to the editor in our local paper this morning - and I think the
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>
> -Cathy Moore, Bloomington
People;
Corn and rice gluten (and many other manufactures products) are present
in people food as well as pet food.
I guarantee that they all come off the same boat.
I wonder how many cases of kidney failure in humans are caused by
additives in manufactured food products.
And what makes you think anyone in the media or government would tell
you about it. (China has had "most favored nation status" for a decade
or more now.)