> Thank you very much for this one C.N. I was thinking about this one
> yesterday, so when I noticed you post it today, I had already realised
> that this problem is far more widespread than we are aware of.
On May 3, 2:59 pm, jXwXeXrXmXoX...@sonic.net wrote:
> > Thank you very much for this one C.N. I was thinking about this one
> > yesterday, so when I noticed you post it today, I had already realised
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Joyce
And I wonder if some pet diseases like renal failure in cats was
always at the rate it is now, or if it started to increase at around
the same time as the melamine started going into the food?
I wish the people responsible for this had to eat the same
contaminated ingredients they've been disseminating to our pets, until
they develop the same symptoms. It makes me furious.
Donna
jofirey - 04 May 2007 01:57 GMT
> On May 3, 2:59 pm, jXwXeXrXmXoX...@sonic.net wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Donna
No, not bad enough. There are things that will kill a cat that won't harm a
person all that much.
How about we feed them some ground glass instead. That might give them some
clue what this does to cats.
Jo
sheelagh - 06 May 2007 18:29 GMT
> On May 3, 2:59 pm, jXwXeXrXmXoX...@sonic.net wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Donna
> I wish the people responsible for this had to eat the same
> contaminated ingredients they've been disseminating to our pets, until
> they develop the same symptoms. It makes me furious.
It would be a fitting reassurance, wouldn't it? If they were willing
to, I might be inclined to believe them, but not until!! I feel just
as angry about it as you do too!
S;o)