humanepetlo... wrote:
On Mar 22, 1:27 am, "IBen Getiner" <Lappc...@aol.com> wrote:
> On Mar 21, 7:08?pm, War on Globalization <w...@gypsymoth.com> wrote:
> > > $50Mlawsuitfiled against pet food company
> > > http://www.cbc.ca/consumer/story/2007/03/20/pet-food-lawsuit.html??
> They put a posting on their website, at http://www.royalcanin.ca.
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> My cat was sick for a while after eating one of the diets, but
> got better within a few weeks and the company covered all my vet bills.
Since the recall last year was only in the vet channels
you must have let some vet charge you for feeding your
cat poisoned food. You're either stupid, a liar, or RC had
two recalls last year. Which is it?
> Since then, no problems at all. I've been feeding RC ever since
> and my cat loves it. My dog (a German Shepherd) has done so well on
> their retail breed diet, it's unbelievable.
Sounds to me like you like it too.
> I am appalled at how the media twists facts for a 'juicy' story.
Ignorance is bliss.
humanepetlover@gmail.com - 22 Mar 2007 20:14 GMT
On Mar 22, 9:28 am, Jean Anthelme Brillat-Savarin <Sava...@mange.org>
wrote:
> humanepetlo... wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> Ignoranceis bliss.
Your aggression over such a sensitive topic is hard to understand and
quite disturbing. This group is designed for concerned pet owners,
talking about the health of their pets. Do you even have a pet? Or do
you simply come in here to vent your own misguided emotions? Shame on
you.
Fred - 22 Mar 2007 21:23 GMT
> On Mar 22, 9:28 am, Jean Anthelme Brillat-Savarin <Sava...@mange.org>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>> > On Mar 21, 7:08?pm, War on Globalization <w...@gypsymoth.com> wrote:
>> > > > $50Mlawsuitfiled against pet food company
http://www.cbc.ca/consumer/story/2007/03/20/pet-food-lawsuit.html??
>> > They put a posting on their website, athttp://www.royalcanin.ca.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> you simply come in here to vent your own misguided emotions? Shame on
> you.
Messages like this, crossposted to many groups and extolling the virtues of
corporations shown to have been at fault for various things, are usually a
cross between spam and outright propaganda. They are also usually and
insult to the intelligence of the average human, and certainly beneath cats
and maybe even dogs.
When called on it, the propagandists usually play the "aggression" card
accusing the accuser of things like "misguided emotions." It's a pattern
that is not only recognizable to seasoned newsgroup users, but it's like a
fingerprint in identifying corporate propaganda. The propagandists usually
have a litle booklet somewhere telling them what to do in certain
situations. The pattern is so recognizable because they all use the same
book.

Signature
Regards, Fred