Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / Cat Anecdotes / February 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Cat Fancy Letter (to the editor, sort of)

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
jmcquown - 31 Jan 2007 16:16 GMT
In the February issue of 'Cat Fancy' magazine a woman subscriber in Florida
took issue with a letter from the January issue.  The original letter stated
that cats are responsible for decimating the songbird population.  The woman
replying in the February issue email reply said NO, that's not true.  Our
(human) intrusion, clear-cutting of land and over-development is driving the
birds and other creatures out of their natural habitat.  And I agree
totally.

I know for a fact there was a law enacted where I live at least four years
ago -developers are supposed to leave some trees when clearing tracts for
those goofy looking cookie-cutter homes.  Yet just down the street from me
last year they cleared *everything*.  Every tree, everything.  Left nothing
but bare earth.

What kills me (heh) it appears the developer has run out money.  There
hasn't been much of anything done on that particular acreage since early
2006 and they sure can't blame the weather.  It's just sitting there, all
bald and bare earth.

This just so we can have more of those stupid starter homes where there used
to be a rich habitat for birds, foxes, squirrels, chipmonks.

How can someone blame cats (feral or just outdoor) for decimating the bird
population when the developers are chopping down everything in sight all
willy-nilly?!  Outdoor animals have no place to live, to nest, while the
greedy developers remove every tree and bit of foliage where they might make
their homes.  Ticks me off!  GRRRRRRRR.

Jill
Annie Wxill - 31 Jan 2007 16:34 GMT
....   Our
> (human) intrusion, clear-cutting of land and over-development is driving
> the birds and other creatures out of their natural habitat.  ...
> Jill

Hi Jill,
I totally agree that human encroachment is to blame for the loss of birds
and other wildlife.  I'd like to add that whatever birds and wildlife that
feral cats do take down is because of some human neglecting to spay or
neuter a pet.
If there were no feral cats to blame, I wonder if  their accusers would be
forced to take a look in the mirror and recognize the true problem.
Annie
Will in New Haven - 31 Jan 2007 17:19 GMT
> ....   Our> (human) intrusion, clear-cutting of land and over-development is driving
> > the birds and other creatures out of their natural habitat.  ...
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> forced to take a look in the mirror and recognize the true problem.
> Annie

I don't think so. Most of the feral-animal haters are pretty darn
Green. I have heard enough "they don't belong here" excuses for
killing feral horses, donkeys, cats, dogs, camels, carnosaurs and
parrots than I would care to repeat. Every human on earth move back to
East Africa and then we can start "cleansing" the planet of species
that WE moved around in the first place.

I agree with spaying and neutering and trying very hard not to
increase the problem but ferals are part of the natural world, just as
we are.

Will in New Haven

--

OK, "carnosaurs" was just to see if you were paying attention
jmcquown - 31 Jan 2007 18:36 GMT
>> ....   Our> (human) intrusion, clear-cutting of land and
>> over-development is driving
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
> Will in New Haven

Will,

This same issue of 'Cat Fancy' focused on a very community supported feral
cat colony called Project Bay Cat in Foster City, CA.  I'm paraphrasing but
this is the gyst of it:

A woman named Cimeron Morrisey saw all these KITTENS! in an area off the bay
where she and her husband liked to go windsurfing.  She admitted she didn't
know what a feral cat was until a vet friend explained it to her.  He loaned
her a humane trap and explained what she could do to help.

Then she attended a town meeting about the cats and was appalled when she
heard suggestions such as "poison them" or "shoot them.  She told the group
about what she was doing to try to help.  The Homeless Cat Network was there
at the meeting along with members of the Sequoia Audubon Society who voiced
the opinions, yes, this could be managed.

Foster City decided to jump in.  All the city has had to pay out has been
$500 for signs along this stretch stating it's a "managed cat colony and any
public interference is punishable by law".

Feeding stations were set up along the trail.  Crystal Springs Pet Hospital
spays or neuters all the ferals they bring in from this colony for free.
The food is partially funded by these groups but the article states most of
the volunteers who go out to feed (and trap for the spay/neuter process) pay
for their own supplies.  The cats who have been "speutered" have a small
notch in their ear so they won't have to undergo that ordeal again.

It seems to be a very successful project.  Check www.cimeron.com and click
on the PBC Toolkit link if you're looking for information on how to
implement similar projects in your area.

Jill
Gandalf - 31 Jan 2007 19:12 GMT
>In the February issue of 'Cat Fancy' magazine a woman subscriber in Florida
>took issue with a letter from the January issue.  The original letter stated
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
>Jill

I live in a major metropolitan city; there is a major infestation of
crows throughout the city. This started around 15 years ago. They
compete with the more desirable birds for food and habitat. They tend to
win, due to their size, aggressiveness, and pack hunting.

The local State University made a statement about the crow problem many
years ago: human destruction of crow habitat outside the city has driven
them to adapt to the urban landscape, where they have become very, very
successful. They raid small bird's nests for eggs, etc. They are
destroying the local songbird population.

Feral cats, my @ss!

~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Life without cats would be only marginally worth living."
-TC, and the unmercifully, relentlessly, sweet calico kitty, Kenzie.

How you behave towards cats here below determines your status in Heaven.
- Robert Heinlein

Life is very difficult. Once you understand that, life becomes easier.
-Buddha
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 01 Feb 2007 00:52 GMT
> I live in a major metropolitan city; there is a major infestation of
> crows throughout the city. This started around 15 years ago. They
> compete with the more desirable birds for food and habitat. They tend to
> win, due to their size, aggressiveness, and pack hunting.

And don't forget: amazing intelligence. (OK, they're not as smart as
ravens, but they're still pretty smart!)

> The local State University made a statement about the crow problem many
> years ago: human destruction of crow habitat outside the city has driven
> them to adapt to the urban landscape, where they have become very, very
> successful. They raid small bird's nests for eggs, etc. They are
> destroying the local songbird population.

> Feral cats, my @ss!

I guess the crows are too big for the feral cats to take care of?

Joyce
Kreisleriana - 31 Jan 2007 20:23 GMT
>In the February issue of 'Cat Fancy' magazine a woman subscriber in Florida
>took issue with a letter from the January issue.  The original letter stated
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
>Jill

I don't blame you.  It ticks me off, too.  Every time I look up, I see
some other way we're just devouring the earth, and messing it up.  I
was looking a lot at polar bears yesterday, and reading about how the
ice where they live is melting, and bears are drowning.  

And that BS about cats eating all the birds?  Most can't *catch*  most
birds (excepting that genius Boyfriend! ;)) any more than I can hit a
major-league fastball.  What most cats out there are eating is rats,
mice, voles, moles, lizards, bugs, etc.  

Theresa
Stinky Pictures: http://community.webshots.com/album/125591586JWEFwh

Make Levees, Not War
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 01 Feb 2007 00:50 GMT
> I don't blame you.  It ticks me off, too.  Every time I look up, I see
> some other way we're just devouring the earth, and messing it up.  I
> was looking a lot at polar bears yesterday, and reading about how the
> ice where they live is melting, and bears are drowning.  

I know - every time I think about that, I get teary and choked up. That
is just unbearably sad. They swim back toward the north pole when the
weather starts to get warmer, but they've adapted to that trip being a
certain distance because until recently, they would reach solid ice much
sooner. Poor things have no idea what hit them. They're just swimming
along as usual, and the water just keeps going and going and going... :'-(

Joyce
Adrian A - 01 Feb 2007 10:48 GMT
>  > I don't blame you.  It ticks me off, too.  Every time I look up, I
>  see > some other way we're just devouring the earth, and messing it
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Joyce

The thing I find terribly depressing is the thought they could become
extinct within 40 years. :-(
Signature

Adrian (Owned by Snoopy and Bagheera)
Cats leave pawprints on your heart.
http://community.webshots.com/user/clowderuk

jmcquown - 01 Feb 2007 15:51 GMT
>> In the February issue of 'Cat Fancy' magazine a woman subscriber in
>> Florida took issue with a letter from the January issue.  The
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>> the street from me last year they cleared *everything*.  Every tree,
>> everything.  Left nothing but bare earth.

(snip self)
>> Jill
>
> I don't blame you.  It ticks me off, too.  Every time I look up, I see
> some other way we're just devouring the earth, and messing it up.
(snippage)

What kills me about the developers razing all the trees to create a housing
development is this:  Then they hire landscapers to come in and plant a few
puny shrubs and maybe a young sapling here and there in the front yards of
the houses.  Now why go to all that trouble (and added expense!) when you
can leave trees which will create shade now, not 50 years from now, and not
completely decimate the habitat for the wildlife?

Where my parents live in SC, they had to work building their house around
not cutting down trees over a certain diameter.  They have a neighbor who
actually had to have a large > cut into the corner of one part of the end of
their roof to accomodate a large tree and its future growth.  This place
never looked like a place that had been stripped.  There was and always has
been abundant wildlife there.  It's a very peaceful place :)

Jill
CatNipped - 01 Feb 2007 17:11 GMT
> In the February issue of 'Cat Fancy' magazine a woman subscriber in
> Florida
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
> Jill

I totally agree.  They're doing the same thing here in Spring Texas (just
north of Houston).  The weird thing is, I would *NEVER* buy a house in this
environment that didn't have trees shading it - the electric bill in summer
would be enough to cause heart failure!  We have 26 trees on our lot and
even so the heat in August causes the attic to be heat-stroke hot, and we
pay around $400 - $500 a month for electricity from June to October!

Hugs,

CatNipped

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.