Cat Forum / Cat Anecdotes / September 2006
UPDATE: The guy who hit me is LYING! :(
|
|
Thread rating:  |
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 16 Sep 2006 01:54 GMT I got a call today from the insurance company for the guy who backed up into my car with his truck. The f*****g b*st*rd is claiming that I rear-ended him!!! I can hardly believe it - I'm really upset. I'm going to end up with a bad driving record, and my premiums are going to go way up.
He had no damage to his truck. I had thousands of dollars worth of damage. Clearly, he wants to get off scott-free, and he probably will. I will not get my deductible back, but far worse, this will be on my record and I will be known as a dangerous driver.
No, I did not call the police at the time. I would like to shoot myself for that omission. But I didn't, and I am now stuck dealing with this situation as it is. Unfortunately!
There were no witnesses that I can recall. Although I'm thinking of ringing a couple of doorbells just to see if anyone did see it, but didn't happen to come over to talk to us. This happened right in my neighborhood, so I don't feel too weird doing that. Or maybe I could put up some signs. Does anyone think that's a good idea?
The adjuster who works for my insurance company is off today, so I have to wait until Monday to talk to her. She said that if they denied it, they would go to arbitration, but I don't have much hope.
Does anyone have any *other* ideas of what I might do about this?
I didn't get the guy's phone number (got everything else from him!) so I can't call him and ask how he could do this to me. This was not an accident with any grey areas. You know how sometimes in an accident, it's hard to tell who's at fault, because it's not clear exactly what happened. In that situation, I would understand if the other person claimed it was my fault. They might honestly believe it was.
However, THIS WAS NOT THAT KIND OF ACCIDENT. It was very obvious to both of us what happened. I was sitting still, and he put his truck in reverse and backed right into me. He even said, "I put the truck in reverse by mistake." He admitted he was at fault. Now it's his word against mine. And he's going to win it, because rear-ending accidents are extremely common, whereas people don't usually back up into a car behind them! So who are they going to believe?
Purrs would be lovely, but if anyone has been through this and who knows what my rights are - if I have any - or has any suggestions of how I might prevent myself from being a victim in THIS situation (I know how to do it in the future, ie, GET WITNESSES - but I need help NOW), I am all ears!
Tearful Joyce
Cheryl - 16 Sep 2006 02:29 GMT > I didn't get the guy's phone number (got everything else from > him!) so I can't call him and ask how he could do this to me. [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > people don't usually back up into a car behind them! So who are > they going to believe? I'd let it go to court. I'm not sure if I'd try to find a witness, and just trust that judges who preside over small claims court (or whatever type of proceedings it is) will know what questions to ask when it's one person's word over the others. They have ways of learning who is credible. I know that doesn't help you in the short run. What type of insurance do you have with your insurance company? Maybe you can get a rental car that they'll pay for while it's being settled? I understand your panic! When I was hit I was afraid that the mother of the kid that hit me was going to try to fight it since it was their policy. But, she and her son did the right thing. A good influence on her son. Ethical.
Good luck, purrs, and hope this settles soon.
 Signature Cheryl
EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) - 16 Sep 2006 20:20 GMT > I'd let it go to court. I'm not sure if I'd try to find a witness, > and just trust that judges who preside over small claims court (or > whatever type of proceedings it is) will know what questions to ask > when it's one person's word over the others. They have ways of > learning who is credible. I know that doesn't help you in the short > run. I doubt it would ever get to court! "Arbitration" maybe, but that's purely an insurance company thing, I think. This sort of thing happens all the time, with the guilty party having second thoughts and lying to his/her insurance company. Once the matter has been placed in the hands of your insurance company, it's their job to take care of it. Best thing is to let them do it.
> What type of insurance do you have with your insurance > company? Maybe you can get a rental car that they'll pay for while > it's being settled? My insurance includes a "loss of vehicle" provision that will pay at least PART of the rental for a given number of days. Also, there are small rental agencies (not Hertz, Atlas and Enterprise) who rent "transportation" quality used vehicles for a lot less than the big companies charge for pristine late-model ones. (You don't care what it looks like, just so it gets you back and forth while your own is in the shop.)
Karen - 16 Sep 2006 02:29 GMT > I got a call today from the insurance company for the guy who backed > up into my car with his truck. The f*****g b*st*rd is claiming that I [quoted text clipped - 46 lines] > > Tearful Joyce I don't have experience, but I'm sending purrs anyway. I certainly don't think there is any harm seeing if you can find someone who saw it. It would be your best opportunity I think. I'm so sorry this is happening.
Pat - 16 Sep 2006 02:53 GMT >I got a call today from the insurance company for the guy who backed > up into my car with his truck. The f*****g b*st*rd is claiming that I > rear-ended him!!! I can hardly believe it - I'm really upset. I'm > going to end up with a bad driving record, and my premiums are going > to go way up. If he knows there were no witnesses (or none that you can easily find) he's probably doing this for the same reason you need witnesses.
> He had no damage to his truck. I had thousands of dollars worth of > damage. Clearly, he wants to get off scott-free, and he probably [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > myself for that omission. But I didn't, and I am now stuck dealing > with this situation as it is. Unfortunately! Well, you still have the option of shooting yourself, but I wouldn't recommend taking it, and would be very unhappy to learn that you did.
> There were no witnesses that I can recall. Although I'm thinking of > ringing a couple of doorbells just to see if anyone did see it, but > didn't happen to come over to talk to us. This happened right in my > neighborhood, so I don't feel too weird doing that. Or maybe I could > put up some signs. Does anyone think that's a good idea? I wouldn't bother with the signs, I would just ask around.
> The adjuster who works for my insurance company is off today, so I > have to wait until Monday to talk to her. She said that if they > denied it, they would go to arbitration, but I don't have much hope. I would expect that anyone who has been an arbitrator for any length of time has probably learned to detect when someone is lying. So if it's only your word against the doer's, I wouldn't be as pessimistic as you seem to be.
> Does anyone have any *other* ideas of what I might do about this? Stop fuming. It won't do you any good and will have negative effects on your health and peace of mind.
> I didn't get the guy's phone number (got everything else from him!) > so I can't call him and ask how he could do this to me. This was not [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > accidents are extremely common, whereas people don't usually back up > into a car behind them! So who are they going to believe? Whoever seems more credible to them at arbitration.
> Purrs would be lovely, but if anyone has been through this and who > knows what my rights are - if I have any - or has any suggestions of > how I might prevent myself from being a victim in THIS situation (I > know how to do it in the future, ie, GET WITNESSES - but I need help > NOW), I am all ears! I haven't been through exactly the same kind of thing but I can tell you about a similar incident from my own life and how it turned out.
I was stopped in traffic on an expressway due to construction ahead. There were cars ahead, behind, and on both sides. Everyone was stopped. The car behind me was the last in the stopped line/lane that I was in. I was at the wheel of a tiny compact car. The vehicle in front of me was a large pickup truck, and in back was a full-size sedan.
Someone travelling in my lane apparently didn't notice that traffic ahead was halted, and plowed into the car behind me, which forthwith plowed into mine, which then plowed into the truck ahead. It was a forceful enough hit from behind that even though I had the car in neutral and the hand brake engaged, my car moved forward hard and fast enough to not only jar the truck in front of me but also jar me so hard that I was hurt, almost badly enough to be taken to a hospital in an ambulance. As it happens I was turned around in the driver's seat and facing backwards, in the process of digging either a book or a snack (I forget which) out of a bag on the back seat, when the blow hit my car, and as I turned back around I felt major pain in my back near the waist.
The car behind mine took most of the force so it wasn't as bad as it could have been, but still.... Police arrived and took a report and offered to call for medical help for me. I told them to wait a few minutes until I calmed down and could gauge how bad I really felt, and I ended up turning down the ambulance because I was in a rush to get home, almost there and could seek medical attention there if I felt it was necessary (which I did).
The only damage to my car was a scrape on the front bumper from hitting the truck. The truck was not damaged. My rear bumper was just slightly pushed in. I did not file any claim for the car damage, but on my doctor's advice I sought legal help to file one for the bodily injury, which ended up costing me quite a bit (it was a large amount to me, anyway) to get fixed and out of pain.
The outcome was I could not find a lawyer who wanted to take the case because (1) none of the ones I consulted believed that any judge or jury would believe that in an accident that did so little damage to the car they were in at the time anyone could be hurt, especially if they refused an offer of an ambulance ride, and (b) the amount of the claim was too small to make it worth any lawyer's time.
I hope you have a better outcome.
EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) - 16 Sep 2006 20:24 GMT >>Does anyone have any *other* ideas of what I might do about this? > > Stop fuming. It won't do you any good and will have negative effects on your > health and peace of mind. I second that! Also, insurance companies are smarter than you seem to think - and they deal with this sort of claim and counter-claim all the time.
:-)Liz - 16 Sep 2006 02:58 GMT Joyce, start knocking on doors AND put a ad in the paper asking for witnesses to the accident...That's what they do here...Usually works too... Good Luck!... :-) Liz
>I got a call today from the insurance company for the guy who backed > up into my car with his truck. The f*****g b*st*rd is claiming that I [quoted text clipped - 46 lines] > > Tearful Joyce Micha - 16 Sep 2006 12:30 GMT > Joyce, start knocking on doors AND put a ad in the paper asking for > witnesses to the accident...That's what they do here...Usually works too... > Good Luck!... :-) Liz Strongly agreed.
If it comes to court then your word will stand against his and the best you can hope for is a compromise. Or it will take a lot of time (and money) to get expert's opinions.
You may ask your insurance company, if there is a possibility to mediate between you and your opponent.
Squarely Yours Michael
 Signature Square Dance is friendship put to music Andrea and Michael with cuddle kittens Blacky and Merlin More detail at: http://www.curschmann-sachsen.de
EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) - 16 Sep 2006 20:29 GMT :-)Liz wrote:
> Joyce, start knocking on doors AND put a ad in the paper asking for > witnesses to the accident...That's what they do here...Usually works too... > Good Luck!... :-) Liz IIRC, Joyce lives in Southern Claifornia, where "knocking on doors" in a strange neighborhood is NOT a good idea. An ad in the Penny Saver might get a response (or might not), but the matter is already in the hands of her insurance company, so why not let them do their job?
:-)Liz - 16 Sep 2006 21:41 GMT Dallas isn't exactly Podunk USA :-) Just making suggestions as per request... Me, I'd chew some insurance A*s
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 16 Sep 2006 22:39 GMT > IIRC, Joyce lives in Southern Claifornia, where "knocking on > doors" in a strange neighborhood is NOT a good idea. Just to quickly respond to this: I actually live in Northern CA (the SF Bay Area). And it's not a strange neighborhood, as the accident happened 2 blocks from my house. I wouldn't have considered knocking on doors if it weren't my own neighborhood, but I do know some of my neighbors! :) However, I think I will just put up signs and ask around. The local grocery store is a gossip locus. :)
Joyce
Joy - 16 Sep 2006 03:16 GMT >I got a call today from the insurance company for the guy who backed > up into my car with his truck. The f*****g b*st*rd is claiming that I [quoted text clipped - 46 lines] > > Tearful Joyce Did you at least get his name and license number? I would call the police and ask if you can report it this long after the fact. The chances are good that you can. Then you can get the facts down in writing in a police report. You might look him up in the phone book, so you could provide his address and phone number to the police. However, DO NOT TRY TO CONTACT HIM!
If you have a lawyer, or know one, you might ask what you can do. If you're like most of us, and don't, you might try calling lawyers from the phone book. There are lawyers who will give a free phone consultation. That might tell you exactly what to do or not to do. However, I am 100% positive that contacting the perpetrator is not something you should do.
I wish you all the best.
Joy
EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) - 16 Sep 2006 20:36 GMT > Did you at least get his name and license number? I would call the police > and ask if you can report it this long after the fact. The chances are good [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > might tell you exactly what to do or not to do. However, I am 100% positive > that contacting the perpetrator is not something you should do. She doesn't need a lawyer if she has an insurance company to whom she's already reported the accident. I agree that contacting the guy who hit her is decidedly a BAD idea - that's what insurance adjusters are for! Much better to leave the matter to the opposing insurance companies, rather than confusing the issues and maybe saying something she shouldn't. (No insurance company WANTS to pay out money, so if her own can collect from the other guy's it will - especially when he initially admitted liability.)
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 16 Sep 2006 22:43 GMT > Much better to > leave the matter to the opposing insurance companies, rather > than confusing the issues and maybe saying something she > shouldn't. (No insurance company WANTS to pay out money, so > if her own can collect from the other guy's it will - > especially when he initially admitted liability.) But only to me. :(
However, I think you are correct. If I were to find someone who witnessed the accident, and would attest to the fact that he hit me, I would put that person in touch with my insurance company and let them take the statement.
Everyone who suggested I not try to contact the other driver myself is right, of course. I was very angry yesterday, and all I wanted to do was go up to him and start screaming. But this is the kind of thing that could easily escalate into someone getting shot or something. (Hint: not him, since I don't own a gun.)
Joyce
Mishi - 16 Sep 2006 03:23 GMT >I got a call today from the insurance company for the guy who backed >up into my car with his truck. The f*****g b*st*rd is claiming that I [quoted text clipped - 46 lines] > >Tearful Joyce I would think that you would have some physical injuries if you had rear ended him hard enough to do that type of damage. IF you had rear ended him, there should be skid marks. A thought - will your local newspaper print a letter from you asking if anyone saw the accident, and if so, would they please contact you asap. Our local paper does print those.
Good luck! Mishi
Takayuki - 16 Sep 2006 22:30 GMT >I would think that you would have some physical injuries if you had >rear ended him hard enough to do that type of damage. IF you had rear >ended him, there should be skid marks. A thought - will your local >newspaper print a letter from you asking if anyone saw the accident, >and if so, would they please contact you asap. Our local paper does >print those. I don't know much about these things, but it sounds like a good idea to keep the idea of physical evidence in mind. Joyce used her horn - did anyone in the neighborhood happen to hear it? The damage from being backed into slowly - is it damage that looks different from a higher speed impact?
I hope it works out for Joyce.
Shiral - 16 Sep 2006 06:19 GMT > I got a call today from the insurance company for the guy who backed > up into my car with his truck. The f*****g b*st*rd is claiming that I [quoted text clipped - 46 lines] > > Tearful Joyce Joyce, the best advice I can offer is take pictures of the damage to your car. Take lots of them from a variety of different angles--front sides, from above, from down low. Also, before your memory of how it all happened fades, write down your whole account of the accident as accurately as possible and do it now. Every detail you can remember. Write down what he said VERBATIM if you can. SInce he hit YOU, it may be that an experienced insurance person could verify that by looking at the damage inflicted to your car, how the dents look etc etc. If it goes into arbitration, be confident and speak up for yourself. You're telling the truth, he's not. Body language and eye contact can make a difference about who will be believed.
I'm sorry you're having to go through this, Melissa
Jo Firey - 16 Sep 2006 06:58 GMT >> I got a call today from the insurance company for the guy who backed >> up into my car with his truck. The f*****g b*st*rd is claiming that I [quoted text clipped - 61 lines] > I'm sorry you're having to go through this, > Melissa I wonder if it would help if you showed them the post you wrote here shortly after the accident. Your first several posts make it very clear that you were not at fault.
And I believe they are available to anyone on Google and dated soon after the accident.
Jo
Adrian A - 16 Sep 2006 10:47 GMT > I got a call today from the insurance company for the guy who backed > up into my car with his truck. The f*****g b*st*rd is claiming that I > rear-ended him!!! I can hardly believe it - I'm really upset. I'm > going to end up with a bad driving record, and my premiums are going > to go way up. <snip>
> Tearful Joyce I'm *very* sorry to read this, I wish I could say I'm surprised. Purrs that someone comes forward as a whitness and the truck driver gets into trouble for lying.
 Signature Adrian (Owned by Snoopy and Bagheera) Cats leave pawprints on your heart. http://community.webshots.com/user/clowderuk
EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) - 16 Sep 2006 20:08 GMT > I got a call today from the insurance company for the guy who backed > up into my car with his truck. The f*****g b*st*rd is claiming that I > rear-ended him!!! I can hardly believe it - I'm really upset. I'm > going to end up with a bad driving record, and my premiums are going > to go way up. I hope you simply referred them to your own insurance company? Once you placed a claim with your company, his insurance has no legal right to discuss it with you directly.
> He had no damage to his truck. I had thousands of dollars worth of > damage. Clearly, he wants to get off scott-free, and he probably > will. I will not get my deductible back, but far worse, this will be > on my record and I will be known as a dangerous driver. If there were no witnesses (if there were, he'd be an idiot to lie about it) it's your word against his. Presumably you told your insurance company what happened when you called and placed your claim - let them handle it. There are ways of determining who did what to whom, and insurance adjusters are pretty well trained, these days. He can say what he likes, but unless there is clear evidence that's what really happened, it shouldn't affect your driving record. (IMO, the fact his truck was not damaged would be pretty good evidence.)
> No, I did not call the police at the time. I would like to shoot > myself for that omission. But I didn't, and I am now stuck dealing > with this situation as it is. Unfortunately! Calling the police doesn't do a hell of a lot of good in the Los Angeles area, unless someone is injured. I witnessed an accident where some idiot female got impatient in a parking lot, tried to back up and take another lane, slammed into one parked car knocking it into another (causing extensive damage to both), and because the idiot woman who was sitting in the car when it was hit kept insisting she was not hurt (instead of being "not sure"), the person on the police switchboard just didn't want to know about it, and refused to send a car!
> I didn't get the guy's phone number (got everything else from him!) > so I can't call him and ask how he could do this to me. That's your insurance company's job. Let them handle it, that's part of what you pay them for. They'd be the first to advise you not to do anything on your own!
> However, THIS WAS NOT THAT KIND OF ACCIDENT. It was very obvious to > both of us what happened. I was sitting still, and he put his truck > in reverse and backed right into me. He even said, "I put the truck > in reverse by mistake." He admitted he was at fault. Which you presumably told your insurance company, when you phoned them after the accident.
Now it's his
> word against mine. And he's going to win it, because rear-ending > accidents are extremely common, whereas people don't usually back up > into a car behind them! Oh really? Since when?
So who are they going to believe?
The physical evidence?
> Purrs would be lovely, but if anyone has been through this and who > knows what my rights are - if I have any - or has any suggestions of > how I might prevent myself from being a victim in THIS situation (I > know how to do it in the future, ie, GET WITNESSES - but I need help > NOW), I am all ears! LET YOUR INSURANCE COMPANY HANDLE IT!!!!!!!! You've already put it their hands, give them credit for knowing their business, and leave it there!
Christina Websell - 16 Sep 2006 20:44 GMT >> I got a call today from the insurance company for the guy who backed >> up into my car with his truck. The f*****g b*st*rd is claiming that I [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] >> myself for that omission. But I didn't, and I am now stuck dealing >> with this situation as it is. Unfortunately! I don't think calling the police would have made any difference, as they didn't see it, did they? Here in UK we have to report it, unless the accident occurred on private property.
I completely agree with Evelyn. You have made your statement about what happened and he has made his. So don't worry about it any more and let the insurance companies sort it out between themselves. There are ways of telling what happened by experts examining the damage to the car/s. It's not so easy to say "it wasn't me, it was her" any more. I wouldn't like to be in that chap's shoes when he is proved to have been lying. Calming purrs coming from Boyfie (tiny ones) and KFC (tractor sized)
Tweed
Magic Mood Jeep© - 16 Sep 2006 21:10 GMT >>> I got a call today from the insurance company for the guy who backed >>> up into my car with his truck. The f*****g b*st*rd is claiming that [quoted text clipped - 40 lines] > > Tweed Is his truck a newer truck? Some (more and more every year) have micro computers in them that an insurance agency will know how to access (as do the police). It tracks the date, time, speed and (this is the important part) what gear the transmission was in.
If there's any paperwork that states date & time, they can look it up! End of his bullsh!t, in a big way.
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 16 Sep 2006 22:49 GMT "Magic Mood Jeep?" <nobody@nowhere.net> wrote:
> Is his truck a newer truck? Some (more and more every year) have micro > computers in them that an insurance agency will know how to access (as do > the police). It tracks the date, time, speed and (this is the important > part) what gear the transmission was in. Wow, I didn't know about that. It's a 2002, is that considered "newer"? :)
The thing about the gear would be critical evidence! I'll ask about that.
Joyce
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 16 Sep 2006 22:47 GMT > I don't think calling the police would have made any difference, > as they didn't see it, did they? No, but he might have admitted it to the cops at the time. Maybe he didn't think of lying until later.
> There are ways of telling what happened by experts examining the > damage to the car/s. It's not so easy to say "it wasn't me, it > was her" any more. That's not what my insurance adjuster said, because I asked her just that. She said there's really no way to tell the difference between a "backed- up-into" collision and a "rear-ended" one, just by looking at the damage.
I hope they got pictures of my damaged car, because it will be completely repaired by Tuesday!
> Calming purrs coming from Boyfie (tiny ones) and KFC (tractor sized) Thank you!!! Licky says hi to his sweetie, and also says that she should keep eating. Whatever it is she wants to eat, but eat!
Joyce
EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) - 17 Sep 2006 19:06 GMT > I hope they got pictures of my damaged car, because it will be completely > repaired by Tuesday! I assume you reported it to your insurance company before you took it for an estimate of the repair costs? In that case the adjuster wyould have taken pictures (and good, clear ones, since in these days of digital cameras, they don't have to wait until they are developed).
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 17 Sep 2006 20:43 GMT >> I hope they got pictures of my damaged car, because it will be completely >> repaired by Tuesday!
> I assume you reported it to your insurance company before > you took it for an estimate of the repair costs? In that > case the adjuster wyould have taken pictures (and good, > clear ones, since in these days of digital cameras, they > don't have to wait until they are developed). Evelyn,
I called my insurance company before I did anything else. They provided a body shop, a towing company to get my car there, they did the estimate (and decided whether to pay for the damages, or declare it a total loss - see my prior posts about *that*). This all happened last week, before I found out what was going on with the guy who hit me. The adjuster indeed went to the shop to examine my car and assess the damages, and I can only assume she took pictures.
Joyce
Cheryl - 17 Sep 2006 21:43 GMT On Sun 17 Sep 2006 03:43:43p, wrote in rec.pets.cats.anecdotes (news:450da56f$0$34530$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net):
> > I assume you reported it to your insurance company before > > you took it for an estimate of the repair costs? In that [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > examine my car and assess the damages, and I can only assume she > took pictures. Plus, I think all insurance companies are different. When I had my accident a few months ago, first thing I did was call *my* insurance company, but they couldn't do anything unless it was my fault. They referred me to the guilty parties insurance company. I didn't realize that you've been dealing with your own insurance company all this time.
In my case, I reported it to the insurance company of the kid's mother (he was covered on her policy). They told me they couldn't do anything until it was reported by them. It took about a week before they did so. Once they did, however, since they took responsibility, it was only another week before it was fixed.
Back to my insurance company: they told me that if the responsible party didn't claim responsibility, I could report it back to them, but for my insurance company to pay for damages I'd have to pay the deductible.
 Signature Cheryl
EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) - 18 Sep 2006 05:20 GMT > On Sun 17 Sep 2006 03:43:43p, wrote in rec.pets.cats.anecdotes > (news:450da56f$0$34530$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net): [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > didn't realize that you've been dealing with your own insurance > company all this time. I'm not sure where you live, Cheryl, but if any insurance company in the U.S. told ME that, I'd change companies as quickly as possible! (That's what I pay THEM a fat premium for, and I'd let them know it!)
I never heard of an insurance company that did not INSTRUCT its insured to report any accidents to them (regardless of who was at fault). The way it works here is that you get the other driver's insurance info and license plate number and relay them to your insurance company, along with your description of the accident. (The other driver does the same with his/her insurance carrier.) Each insurance company assign a claim number to its own insured, proceeds to contact the other driver's company, arranges to have its adjusters view the damage to each vehicle, and the two companies take it from there.
It works a bit differently in states with "no fault" insurance because there, as I understand it, each company pays for any damage to the vehicle driven by its own insured, regardless of who hit whom. But in any case, once you've reported it to your insurance company, THEY are supposed to handle it!
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 18 Sep 2006 07:41 GMT > It works a bit differently in states with "no fault" > insurance because there, as I understand it, each company > pays for any damage to the vehicle driven by its own > insured, regardless of who hit whom. I assume that California is *not* a "no fault" state?
Joyce
Joy - 18 Sep 2006 08:17 GMT > > It works a bit differently in states with "no fault" > > insurance because there, as I understand it, each company [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Joyce I thought it was, but it can't be. When I was in an accident a few years ago, the driver at fault (or rather her insurance) paid everything.
Joy
EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) - 19 Sep 2006 03:52 GMT > > It works a bit differently in states with "no fault" > > insurance because there, as I understand it, each company > > pays for any damage to the vehicle driven by its own > > insured, regardless of who hit whom. > > I assume that California is *not* a "no fault" state? Definitely not! (That's why you must prove you have liability insurance in order to register a vehicle.)
> Joyce EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) - 18 Sep 2006 04:59 GMT > > jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > indeed went to the shop to examine my car and assess the damages, and I > can only assume she took pictures. Then you can rest easy on that score, at least - it's the first thing they do, when they examine a car for damage.
> Joyce Bridget - 16 Sep 2006 21:10 GMT They can tell by looking at your car whether you were stopping when you hit someone - when you stop the front of your car goes down and it changes the kind of damage you would get on the vehicle. And in order for his vehicle not to be damaged, you (if you were at fault) would have had to have been slowing down otherwise it wouldn't make sense, so you do have evidence on your car and the claims adjuster and a police officer needs to look at your car.
I would still call the police and explain why. Tell them you know they can't see the scene of the accident, but you want it on file and that you want their investigators to examine your car for how the accident occurred. It is a crime to lie about this and try to get out of paying. So when the police go to talk to him about this and he gives his side of the story, he will be lying to them and he will be confronted with that in court or with the mediator. And the more times he has to tell his story, the more likely there are to be holes in it. They'll ask him all kinds of questions like what happened to his head when you hit him and expect an answer right there on the spot. He should know if it happened the way he said. They'll ask him if he hit the seatbelt (he shouldn't have). And all kinds of questions he won't know the answer to because it didn't happen to him. So, yeah, talk to the police.
Bridget
> I got a call today from the insurance company for the guy who backed > up into my car with his truck. The f*****g b*st*rd is claiming that I [quoted text clipped - 46 lines] > > Tearful Joyce polonca12000 - 16 Sep 2006 22:36 GMT > I got a call today from the insurance company for the guy who backed > up into my car with his truck. The f*****g b*st*rd is claiming that I > rear-ended him!!! I can hardly believe it - I'm really upset. I'm > going to end up with a bad driving record, and my premiums are going > to go way up. <snip>
I'm so very sorry you have to go through this. We are sending lots of purrs and best wishes for things to work out for you in the end, Polonca and Soncek
Ollie - 18 Sep 2006 12:49 GMT I'm still not quite sure which insurance company called you but I wanted to offer my experience here. I was rear ended while at a complete stop at a traffic light. The other insurance company called me and said "IF their insured was found at fault" etc. I was floored since the guy admited it (he had spilled his coffee, noticed the car rolling, and hit the gas instead of the brake) and had been very nice about the whole thing.
Bottom line - the guy was still nice about the whole thing. It was his insurance company (Allstate) who were being a**es about the whole thing. If it is the other person's insurance company who called, they may be the ones who are doing the lying.
>I got a call today from the insurance company for the guy who backed >up into my car with his truck. The f*****g b*st*rd is claiming that I [quoted text clipped - 46 lines] > >Tearful Joyce Jane - 18 Sep 2006 14:07 GMT > I'm still not quite sure which insurance company called you but I wanted to > offer my experience here. I was rear ended while at a complete stop at a [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > it is the other person's insurance company who called, they may be the ones > who are doing the lying. On the other side of things, that's exactly WHY I have Allstate as my insurance company. Years ago, before I started driving, my mother got into an accident with another driver, and because the other lady had Allstate, my mother had to pay. I remembered that, and got Allstate when I started driving. Sure enough, they've been very good to me, and fight for my rights every step of the way. Unfortunately, I've been involved in more than my share of accidents, too. (Got a gift for being in the wrong place at the right time)
On the other hand, I've never had anyone lie about hitting me, either. That's gotta suck bigtime.
Jane
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 18 Sep 2006 17:09 GMT > I'm still not quite sure which insurance company called you but I wanted to > offer my experience here. I was rear ended while at a complete stop at a > traffic light. The other insurance company called me and said "IF their > insured was found at fault" etc. I was floored since the guy admited it (he > had spilled his coffee, noticed the car rolling, and hit the gas instead of > the brake) and had been very nice about the whole thing.
> Bottom line - the guy was still nice about the whole thing. It was his > insurance company (Allstate) who were being a**es about the whole thing. If > it is the other person's insurance company who called, they may be the ones > who are doing the lying. Wow. The guy who backed into me also has Allstate. Good info to have. I'm not saying they are lying to me, but I'm glad you've spoken up about your experience.
I initially reported the accident to *my* insurance company. They are handling everything. However, Allstate called me last week to get my statement, in order to deal with his claim. It was at that point that the Allstate agent told me he was claiming I rear-ended him.
I assume my insurers are going to fight this. They'll want their money back I'm sure!
Joyce
Jo Firey - 18 Sep 2006 17:41 GMT > > I'm still not quite sure which insurance company called you but I wanted > > to [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > > Joyce We had a rather strange experience with a couple of accidents. First Charlie was rear ended and had his car pushed into heavy traffic by a couple of drugged out guys. Fortunately he wasn't hit again, though it did cause some other fender benders. Other party gave him insurance information.
Not much later I was at McDonalds in my then two week old van. Backed out of a parking space and wham. Mine was a mini van and the other car backing out of the other space was a real van so you know I got all the damage. I honestly couldn't say who hit who. I normally look, back up a couple of feet and stop and look again, and I'm pretty sure that is the point where I was hit. But I honestly didn't see him at all. It was a gray primered out full size Chevy van. And the driver looked pretty disreputable and said he had no insurance. He didn't see me either and also had no idea who hit who.
We exchanged information.
My insurance fixed my van and I forgot about it.
A few months later we get a check from out insurance refunding our deductible. I assumed it was from Charlie's accident. After all it was their fault and they supposedly did have insurance.
No. They didn't have insurance after all, and had pretty much disappeared. The money was from the gray van that hit me.
I'm still convinced that the van that hit me was working undercover for the local drug enforcement teams.
Jo
sriddles@aol.com - 18 Sep 2006 17:51 GMT > > > I'm still not quite sure which insurance company called you but I wanted > > > to [quoted text clipped - 57 lines] > > Jo Wow. That's really peculiar. You may be right. It slays me how they figure out who's "at fault" sometimes. My son was leaving a drive-through fast food window, and two teenage thugs were fighting and ran right in front of him. He hit one guy (just enough to knock him down--about 5mph). His mother claimed he suffered a back injury and sued us. Our insurance co. had to pay out big bucks. It still infuriates me to think about it.
Sherry
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 18 Sep 2006 20:41 GMT > It slays me how they figure out who's "at fault" sometimes. My son was > leaving a drive-through fast food window, and two teenage thugs were > fighting and ran right in front of him. He hit one guy (just enough to > knock him down--about 5mph). His mother claimed he suffered a back > injury and sued us. Our insurance co. had to pay out big bucks. It > still infuriates me to think about it. Even when it's not a driver's fault, any accident involving a pedestrian is usually considered to be the driver's *responsibility*. I guess the thinking is, the driver has the more deadly weapon. Still, there are times when it seems really unfair, because a driver can't see all things or predict the future. If someone darts in front too fast, how can a driver help that? But in terms of legal liability, the driver is usually considered responsible.
I think a similar logic is working against me in my situation. If a collision occurs between the back of one person's car and the front of the other's, the person in back is usually considered responsible. For example, if someone driving in front of you suddenly stops and you rear-end them, too bad, you're still liable. Of course in my case, I wasn't even moving, but I fear that the other guys' insurance is looking at this as a slam-dunk. I just hope they're wrong!
Joyce
tension_on_the_wire - 18 Sep 2006 21:31 GMT > I think a similar logic is working against me in my situation. If a > collision occurs between the back of one person's car and the front of [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Joyce Even in a pedestrian accident, if a person pops out from between parked minivans, or something, the driver can be let off, and the pedestrian faulted. They do take pedestrian irresponsibility into account, sometimes. They will decide how much time you had to react, and whether any available skid marks are consistent with that time.
What is in favor of your story, by the way, is not just your claim that you were standing still, but that you saw it coming and honked your horn to warn them and *still* they kept coming. That is something worth emphasizing and re-emphasizing. And another thing....ask your insurance company whether the other guys have the right to call you up directly for a statement. Most insurance companies advise you to talk to no one but your own. They should have got your statement from your own company's records. That's why Allstate is good, they know the loopholes.
--tension
glsummer@neptunelink.com - 20 Sep 2006 18:53 GMT >I got a call today from the insurance company for the guy who backed >up into my car with his truck. The f*****g b*st*rd is claiming that I [quoted text clipped - 46 lines] > >Tearful Joyce {{{Joyce}}}
I am so sorry that happened to you.
My advice would be to get an attorney. That's what I did after my car wreck, and I hate to say it, but I think we are past the days of people being able to amicably work things out. An attorney can help you, take the stress off you, and probably help you win. Yes, it costs, but most of the attorney's fees get paid out of the win and not your pocket.
I hope you're feeling better soon.
Ginger-lyn
Home Pages: http://www.moonsummer.com http://www.angelfire.com/folk/glsummer (homepage & cats) http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~summer/index.htm (genealogy) http://www.movieanimals.bravehost.com/ (The Violence Against Animals in Movies Website)
|
|
|