 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue CatKB.com Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map |
Cat Forum / Cat Anecdotes / July 2006COPY YAHOO PHOTO ALBUM
I have received a link to yahoo photo album containing several albums. Each album has many pictures. I would like to copy all these albums into my own yahoo album. Does any one know how to copy each album ( not the pictures individually) to my hard drive or to another yahoo account . Thanks Murali_ks > I have received a link to yahoo photo album containing several > albums. Each album has many pictures. I would like to copy all [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Murali_ks This is a very peculier first post to usenet, certainly not on topic. Why would anybody here want to help you infringe copyright?  SignatureAdrian (Owned by Snoopy and Bagheera) Cats leave pawprints on your heart. http://community.webshots.com/user/clowderuk I am not infringing copyright. I received a link to access the photos. Why should not I save the pictures in my hard disk. I would not have received the link if it is a secret matter. I could have saved them by copying individually. I only asked for shot cut procedure. Where is the infringment of copyright. Those whio want to reply my post, would do so because it is a general matter regarding yahoo photos. Why should you take decision on behalf of others questiong their right or decision to help me. It shouldnt bother you. If you do not want to help, just say so. >> I have received a link to yahoo photo album containing several >> albums. Each album has many pictures. I would like to copy all [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >This is a very peculier first post to usenet, certainly not on topic. Why >would anybody here want to help you infringe copyright? Yes, that is infringement of copyright (at least, under U.S. law) unless you have been given permission to copy. Receiving a link invites you to *look,* not to copy -- and especially not co copy entire albums. According to the U.S. Copyright Office, copyright is automatically obtained as soon as a work is created, and publication of a copyright notice is not required. Of course, it's true that not much attention is paid unless a person tries to use those items for personal gain (including using them in your own web page). Many people confuse copyright with registration, which does confer extra protection. MaryL >I am not infringing copyright. I received a link to access the photos. >Why [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] >>This is a very peculier first post to usenet, certainly not on topic. Why >>would anybody here want to help you infringe copyright? This is a family album of our family. I have already taken permission to copy. I am not violating any rights. >Yes, that is infringement of copyright (at least, under U.S. law) unless you >have been given permission to copy. Receiving a link invites you to *look,* [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] >>>This is a very peculier first post to usenet, certainly not on topic. Why >>>would anybody here want to help you infringe copyright? This is a cat group. You will have a better chanc to get a useful response if you post it to some computer related group. Choose the best matching group from the following list: http://www.windowskb.com/Uwe/ForumList.aspx Sorry, in that case you are correct. There have been so many instances of people taking copyrighted material for their own use that I thought this might be the same situation. Many people assume that everything on the Internet is somehow "up for grabs," and I did not realize from your message that this is a family album. I should have asked,. MaryL > This is a family album of our family. I have already taken permission to > copy. I am not violating any rights. [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] >>>>Why >>>>would anybody here want to help you infringe copyright? > Sorry, in that case you are correct. There have been so many instances of > people taking copyrighted material for their own use that I thought this > might be the same situation. Many people assume that everything on the > Internet is somehow "up for grabs," and I did not realize from your message > that this is a family album. I should have asked,. But unless the OP is a cat, why would he/she post questions to rpca about copying a "family" album? ;-) > But unless the OP is a cat, why would he/she post questions > to rpca about copying a "family" album? ;-) Hey, many of us humans have cats as family! :) Joyce > > But unless the OP is a cat, why would he/she post questions > > to rpca about copying a "family" album? ;-) > > Hey, many of us humans have cats as family! :) Good point! > Joyce >> Sorry, in that case you are correct. There have been so many instances >> of people taking copyrighted material for their own use that I thought [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > But unless the OP is a cat, why would he/she post questions to rpca about > copying a "family" album? ;-) It's possible. For example, my sister and I exchange *many* photos of both our two-legged and four-legged family members. However, we do it by e-mail. MaryL >Yes, that is infringement of copyright (at least, under U.S. law) unless you >have been given permission to copy. Receiving a link invites you to *look,* [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >page). Many people confuse copyright with registration, which does confer >extra protection. Looking with a browser involves making copies of the pages and their images, therefore, permission to copy is implicit in posting. However, there is a difference in how the stuff is copied and for what purpose. Some sites block automated copying in a ROBOTS.TXT file, and most owners either state or assume that the material will not actually be used by someone else except under the fair use doctrine or with permission. The sites I manage range from 'don't care' to password protected. SignatureT.E.D. (tdavis@gearbox.maem.umr.edu) Remove "gearbox.maem" to get real address - that one is dead >>Yes, that is infringement of copyright (at least, under U.S. law) unless >>you [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > permission. The sites I manage range from 'don't care' to password > protected. No, permission to copy is *not* implicit in posting. However, the OP in this case just posted a message that he was taling about a family album where he has been given permission. MaryL >>> Yes, that is infringement of copyright (at least, under U.S. law) unless you >>> have been given permission to copy. Receiving a link invites you to *look,* [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > MaryL I just wonder who the OP is? Are you a lurker? Come out and introduce yourself. "Ted Davis" <tdavis@gearbox.maem.umr.edu> wrote: > Looking with a browser involves making copies of the pages and their > images, therefore, permission to copy is implicit in posting. MaryL <stancole1@yahoo.comtake-out-the-litter> responded: > No, permission to copy is *not* implicit in posting. However, the OP in > this case just posted a message that he was taling about a family album > where he has been given permission. Actually, Ted has a point. Every time you "go" to a website, what you are really doing is receiving a copy of that website on your computer (via your browser). So as soon as you can see a website, you have already copied it. Perhaps the issue has to do with *saving* the copy? I very frequently save cute kitty images that people post here, and I like to view them on my desktop. I don't know that this usage counts as "personal gain", unless you're including emotional/spiritual gain. :) Perhaps my doing this would anger some people, so I'm saying it here in the hope that if anyone doesn't want me to do this, ever (or without getting explicit permission each time), they'll say so now. I've always gotten the sense that people are flattered at best, neutral at worst. It's funny the assumptions we make. I was assuming that Murali was a woman. Of course, I have no idea whether I'm right, since I'm not familiar with that name. And there was no logic to my assumption, as I did it unconciously. Joyce > I am not infringing copyright. I received a link to access the > photos. Why should not I save the pictures in my hard disk. I [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > their right or decision to help me. It shouldnt bother you. If you > do not want to help, just say so. You are very ignorant. You didn't take the photos therefore they are not yours to copy. Your post has nothing to do with cats. Top posting is poor netiquate. PLONK > > I am not infringing copyright. I received a link to access the > > photos. Why should not I save the pictures in my hard disk. I [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > PLONK Adrian, you are such an a.shole. Really you are. >I have received a link to yahoo photo album containing several albums. Each >album has many pictures. I would like to copy all these albums into my own >yahoo album. > >Does any one know how to copy each album ( not the pictures individually) >to my hard drive or to another yahoo account . The usual tool for this is WGET for Windows and Linux. It can grab part of a site, and if you forget to use the --no-parent switch, the entire site. It's a command line utility that usually comes with Linux, and can be downloaded from <http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/wget.htm> for Windows. SignatureT.E.D. (tdavis@gearbox.maem.umr.edu) Remove "gearbox.maem" to get real address - that one is dead |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.