Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / Cat Anecdotes / May 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

My kitten is very sick!!

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Alyssa8 - 25 May 2006 11:15 GMT
I have a kitten, about 4 1/2 weeks old, and it has had many problems for the
last couple of weeks.  When it was born it was a normal size, the same as the
rest, and just recently it has gotten smaller than the rest, is normally fat
at the stomache but has very skinny legs and backbones, and has had a
uncontrolable stool.  One eye has got an infection and has started having
troubles standing with its front legs just tonight.  It is an outside kitten
and we bring it in away from the other kittens to eat soft canned food.  When
it gets the chance and can catch the mother cat, it will also eat from her.
He has no troubles eating but is VERY sick.
 IF YOU HAVE ANY HELP OR ADVISE, PLEASE UPDATE ME.  I don't know how long
the kitten is going to live for if he doesn't get help soon.  Any response is
greatly appriciated!!
           
                    Alyssa
Lesley - 25 May 2006 11:38 GMT
>   IF YOU HAVE ANY HELP OR ADVISE, PLEASE UPDATE ME.

Vet. Now- kittens can deteriorate very quickly

Lesley

Slave of the Fabulous Furballs
Alyssa8 - 25 May 2006 16:04 GMT
>>   IF YOU HAVE ANY HELP OR ADVISE, PLEASE UPDATE ME.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Slave of the Fabulous Furballs

Well, thank you for your advise, but the kitten passed away this morning.  It
was very upsetting
Baha - 27 May 2006 16:29 GMT
The poor little one! At least he went to the Bridge knowing that someone
tried to help. He'll be a baby angel's companion in the heavens, and will
remember you when you meet again.

Blessed be,
Baha

>>>   IF YOU HAVE ANY HELP OR ADVISE, PLEASE UPDATE ME.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>Well, thank you for your advise, but the kitten passed away this morning.  It
>was very upsetting
Enfilade - 25 May 2006 14:16 GMT
>   IF YOU HAVE ANY HELP OR ADVISE, PLEASE UPDATE ME.  I don't know how long
> the kitten is going to live for if he doesn't get help soon.  Any response is
> greatly appriciated!!

That kitten must see a vet immediately.

You may have to feed him/her yourself with a bottle if the mother is
untameable and if s/he requires regular medication or a stay at the
vet.  If S/he is away from the mother, the mother may abandon him/her
and that means YOU are the new mother.

--Fil
sharppointy1@yahoo.com - 25 May 2006 15:38 GMT
I hope your kitten has been to the vet by now- loving healing vibes on
the way from here.
barbara
Alyssa8 - 25 May 2006 16:17 GMT
>I hope your kitten has been to the vet by now- loving healing vibes on
>the way from here.
>barbara

Thank you for your concern.  He needed to see a vet, but we just couldn't
afford it if they weren't going to do anything for it.  He was left outside
the other night and it rained and he was barely alive when my mom found him,
so we dried him off and kept him warm with a hair dryer and let him sleep on
a heating pad.  So we think that he had too much fluid in his lungs and just
this morning, at about 5:00, we found him outside on the ground close to
death again.  So we repeated what we had done the first time and he began to
have more of a reaction.  We left him to sleep on the heating pad and my mom
and i went back to bed.  When we woke up we found him and he had quit
breathing.  He was a fighter against it, but i think that he was just to sick.
Irulan - 25 May 2006 17:50 GMT
Ah, so sorry to hear the little one passed away. We will light a candle so
he can fine his way to the Rainbow Bridge where he will be happy and
healthy.
Lily & her mama

Signature

Irulan
from the stars we come
to the stars we return
from now until the end of time

>>I hope your kitten has been to the vet by now- loving healing vibes on
>>the way from here.
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> breathing.  He was a fighter against it, but i think that he was just to
> sick.
Alyssa8 - 25 May 2006 19:53 GMT
>Ah, so sorry to hear the little one passed away. We will light a candle so
>he can fine his way to the Rainbow Bridge where he will be happy and
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>> breathing.  He was a fighter against it, but i think that he was just to
>> sick.

Thank you for your concern, my whole family was very upset.  But its
grandmother passed away three years ago labor day, so now he can see her and
tell her that we all miss her too.  I'm actually kinda glad he passed,
because now hes not suffering(if he was).
sharppointy1@yahoo.com - 25 May 2006 19:57 GMT
ahh, Alyssa, that is sad.  I'm sorry.
B
Alyssa8 - 25 May 2006 16:08 GMT
>>   IF YOU HAVE ANY HELP OR ADVISE, PLEASE UPDATE ME.  I don't know how long
>> the kitten is going to live for if he doesn't get help soon.  Any response is
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>--Fil

We didn't really have the money to bring the kitten in and we already knew
that they wouldn't have done anything for him.  He was old enough that the
kitten was eating canned food and STIL drinking from the mother.  Thank you
for your advise, but I wish I could have done something sooner.  My kitten
passed away this morning.
mlbriggs - 25 May 2006 17:52 GMT
> I have a kitten, about 4 1/2 weeks old, and it has had many problems for the
> last couple of weeks.  When it was born it was a normal size, the same as the
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>            
>                      Alyssa

When I first read this is thought "troll".  No one could be so
insensitive as to leave a four week old kitten outside to more or less
fend for itself.  Suggestion>  Either get on your computer or go to the
library and read up on cat care.   If you are a child, please remember to
read and learn as much as you can about baby animals before you try to
raise any.    MLB
mlabofski@yahoo.co.uk - 25 May 2006 18:28 GMT
I got the impression from reading her first post that it was a feral
kitten, that they were just trying to look after, possibly it was the
"runt" of the litter which is why the mother didn't look after it
properly, I've seen this happen before, very sad.

Marcia

> > I have a kitten, about 4 1/2 weeks old, and it has had many problems for the
> > last couple of weeks.  When it was born it was a normal size, the same as the
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> read and learn as much as you can about baby animals before you try to
> raise any.    MLB
Alyssa8 - 25 May 2006 19:50 GMT
>> I have a kitten, about 4 1/2 weeks old, and it has had many problems for the
>> last couple of weeks.  When it was born it was a normal size, the same as the
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>read and learn as much as you can about baby animals before you try to
>raise any.    MLB

All of our cats just happen to be strays that have either been abandoned when
they where little or have just wondered into our yard so we take them in.  We
breed dogs, so we can't have any diseases or illnesses spread in them, so we
HAVE to keep all of our cats outside in order to keep the dogs healthy.  And
I am not a 5-year old, I just happen to be 14 and am very into my kittens so
i am not a child.  The kitten has been sick for a while and was probably
passed down from the mother cat.  Don't tell me i'm a troll because i
obviously cared about it, or i wouldn't have gotten on the computer for help.
And for your information, i have read about pet care and my mom is a nurse
and we have had numerous cases of sick cats and they have all came out fine
so don't tell me to learn about baby animals before i raise them because we
DO raise them.
Magic Mood Jeep© - 25 May 2006 19:59 GMT
>>> I have a kitten, about 4 1/2 weeks old, and it has had many
>>> problems for the last couple of weeks.  When it was born it was a
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> because we
> DO raise them.

A couple of questions:

If you breed dogs, can you afford veterinary care for them?  Of so, why nor
for the kitten?

This opens a whole other can of worms, but I won't get into *that*...

<cough> puppy mill <cough>
Matthew aka NMR - 25 May 2006 20:10 GMT
>>>> I have a kitten, about 4 1/2 weeks old, and it has had many
>>>> problems for the last couple of weeks.  When it was born it was a
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>
> <cough> puppy mill <cough>

Did I just read that right  you breed dogs  but yet could not afford to take
the cat to the vet.  Yet you can afford to take care of the dogs but not
your cats which you keep outside to prevent disease or illness being spread
to the dogs.  WHAT A LOAD OF BULLSH@T.  Hint there would be no disease if
the cats were outside and properly vaccinated and taken care off.

I bet if a puppy was sick you would have found the money for it somewhere
some how.

Damn People can be so F@cked up. Sometimes wished the law could actually do
upon the criminal what they did upon victims
Karen - 25 May 2006 21:12 GMT
I still smell troll

> >>>> I have a kitten, about 4 1/2 weeks old, and it has had many
> >>>> problems for the last couple of weeks.  When it was born it was a
[quoted text clipped - 51 lines]
> Damn People can be so F@cked up. Sometimes wished the law could actually do
> upon the criminal what they did upon victims
Alyssa8 - 26 May 2006 05:30 GMT
>I still smell troll
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>> Damn People can be so F@cked up. Sometimes wished the law could actually do
>> upon the criminal what they did upon victims

I am SOOO glad that you actually READ my concern about the kitten.  I asked
for advise, not some lame excuse to call a 14 year old a troll, especially
since your probably a grown person.  That just isn't right.  Now i thought
this web site was for helping kittens, not bringing down other peoples
questions and insulting them.
Jo Firey - 26 May 2006 05:56 GMT
>>I still smell troll
>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> this web site was for helping kittens, not bringing down other peoples
> questions and insulting them.

You have said that this four week old kitten has been very ill for weeks,
but was being left outside to protect your dogs and did not have access to
medical care.

In all fairness, how on earth do you (or did you) expect a bunch of people
you do not know and who do not know you to help in a situation like this?
It was already too late.

Sorry but in the real world concern just plain isn't enough.  Your concern
for the kitten could not and did not save it.  We could not help to save it.
Keeping it indoors and providing it with shelter and food likely would have
helped it.  You weren't even managing to do that.

Its called real solutions for real problems.

Jo
Tish Silberbauer - 26 May 2006 06:10 GMT
Below,  Alyssa8 says that she is 14 years old.  So, she is very young
and I think we should give her the benefit of the doubt here.  She
should get credit for noticing and caring, even when she does not have
the personal finances (what 14 year old *does*) to do something about
it herself.  

It's been a horrible week for nasty posts and being reactive (I have
also contributed, in another forum), but please don't let it become a
habit.

I would imagine that she feels very sad at the death of the kitten and
helpless to do anything about it.

Maybe folks in the USA can give her some pointers as to where she can
go for help.  On the other hand, if she's not in the USA, maybe she
can give us a vague idea of where she is (geographically) and others
of us can give her pointers.

Cheers (and I mean it!),
Tish

>>>I still smell troll
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
>Jo
Alyssa8 - 26 May 2006 06:56 GMT
>Below,  Alyssa8 says that she is 14 years old.  So, she is very young
>and I think we should give her the benefit of the doubt here.  She
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>Cheers (and I mean it!),
>Tish

Finely another person who has been nice throughout this all.  I am sry for
all the ripping out, but i have had a rough week, not only with my kitten
passing away, but also with a very close friend(my moms boss) passing away
and my mom catching ammonia.  Right now i am VERY stressed out and haven't
slept for three days and have hardly ate anything.  Right now the whole name
calling thing is getting out of control and i am very sick of it.  I give up,
this whole thing is stupid and almost  everyone in this whole deal has barely
even mentioned any advise about the kitten from the beginning.  Now that its
to late, everyonehas just focused on name calling.  Just end it, its getting
old fast and i dont need to stress out about this anymore.  See if i use one
of these advise things again, the people can be disrespectful.  
         
 I just wanted to thank the people who where ACTUALLY nice enough to give me
advise and information.  I did greatly appriciate it, even if it was to late
i can take it into later consideration in the case of another mishab.  And
thank you for some of your concerns and lighting the candle for the kitten,
it was very thoughful.  And as for the people who caused troubles along this,
i am not impressed what so ever on your behavior like a two-year-old.  No one
ever got a badge for their stupidity or their heartlessness and i hope you
decide to change your ways, otherwise you are going to bring more people down
and cause them the troubles of having to put up with you.

                   GOD BLESS TO YOU ALL,
                                        alyssa
>>>>I still smell troll
>>>>
>[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>>
>>Jo
Jeff Mullen - 27 May 2006 02:58 GMT
>>Below,  Alyssa8 says that she is 14 years old.  So, she is very young
>>and I think we should give her the benefit of the doubt here.  She
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
>>
>>>Jo

Alyssa:

First, let me apologise for my fellow posters' lack of diplomacy.
It is beyond foolishness, in either a practical or a moral sense,
to add insult to injury as they have.  Please forgive us all.

That said, they had a certain point, although they expressed it
poorly.  That point is that you may lack the resources to care
for the cats in your life, even though you obviously care very
much for them.  Speaking as a moron with a Mensa card, I can
understand that someone at your age would be capable of making
decisions reasonably and with heart.  Thus, I must ask:  in a
world where an outdoor cat, on average, lives three years to
an indoor cat's 20, does it truly make sense to care for your
kitties from a distance?

BTW, not to bring up a dead subject, but the sense that I got
from reading the "troll" post was that its author thought that
you were a troll AT FIRST, but then learned better as time
went on.  I do not believe that he or she (the name M. L. Briggs
does not suggest a gender) intended to impugn you as such, as
I similarly do not.

Best wishes, and I hope that you come to have many an anecdote
to pass on from new "owners."  :)  :)  :)

Jeff
Cheryl - 27 May 2006 03:20 GMT
On Fri 26 May 2006 09:58:48p, Jeff Mullen wrote in
rec.pets.cats.anecdotes (news:5d7e1$4477b266$49d7769$7765
@ALLTEL.NET):

> First, let me apologise for my fellow posters' lack of diplomacy.
> It is beyond foolishness, in either a practical or a moral sense,
> to add insult to injury as they have.  Please forgive us all.

Oh, and you who I've never seen before and probably most here would
say the same, are speaking for us all?

> That said, they had a certain point, although they expressed it
> poorly.  That point is that you may lack the resources to care
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> does not suggest a gender) intended to impugn you as such, as
> I similarly do not.

I would. Simply for the reason that Pam pointed out - if the catkb
site gives the choice to post in many of the cat groups (and it
does), why post in one that clearly says "anecdotes" rather than
"health and behavior"?  No brainer to me.  They're new, they don't
know the dynamics of the groups, they clearly haven't even lurked.
I smell a troll too.

> Best wishes, and I hope that you come to have many an anecdote
> to pass on from new "owners."  :)  :)  :)

Signature

Cheryl

Jeff Mullen - 27 May 2006 04:56 GMT
> On Fri 26 May 2006 09:58:48p, Jeff Mullen wrote in
> rec.pets.cats.anecdotes (news:5d7e1$4477b266$49d7769$7765
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Oh, and you who I've never seen before and probably most here would
> say the same, are speaking for us all?

Somebody needs to speak up for reason and manners in this thread--
you certainly aren't.

>>That said, they had a certain point, although they expressed it
>>poorly.  That point is that you may lack the resources to care
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> know the dynamics of the groups, they clearly haven't even lurked.
> I smell a troll too.

That is your prerogative, and you're entitled to your opinion, even
if I do not share it.  It changes nothing, however, and you certainly
could be more polite in the way that you have put this.

My opinion is that YOU are being a troll and trying to pick a fight
with me.  Sorry.  Not interested.  I'm not 14, I'm 42, and I'm too
grown up for that sort of thing--and I'm certainly not going to take
any offense at you calling *someone else* childish names.  Lol!

I will not reply to any further such rudeness on your part.  Please
take your trolling elsewhere.

>>Best wishes, and I hope that you come to have many an anecdote
>>to pass on from new "owners."  :)  :)  :)
Adrian A - 27 May 2006 11:26 GMT
<snip>
> My opinion is that YOU are being a troll and trying to pick a fight
> with me.  Sorry.  Not interested.  I'm not 14, I'm 42, and I'm too
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> I will not reply to any further such rudeness on your part.  Please
> take your trolling elsewhere.

You haven't been here very long, but I've no doubt you've already been put
in some peoples killfiles. To accuse people, that have posted here for
years, of being trolls makes _you_ the rude one. I think you owe Ceryl an
apology.
Signature

Adrian (Owned by Snoopy and Bagheera)
Cats leave pawprints on your heart.
http://community.webshots.com/user/clowderuk

Matthew aka NMR - 27 May 2006 14:05 GMT
> <snip>
>> My opinion is that YOU are being a troll and trying to pick a fight
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> years, of being trolls makes _you_ the rude one. I think you owe Ceryl an
> apology.

Not very long at all 3 post total ever here in this news group   most of his
post are in alt. politics.democrat

http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?show=more&enc_user=A2JvnAsAAAAkr3_8EAL12
qChNCkbeT8r&hl=en&group
=

And Don't even think of apologizing for me I meant what I said
Jeff Mullen - 27 May 2006 19:23 GMT
>><snip>
>>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> And Don't even think of apologizing for me I meant what I said

I'm sorry, it's too late for that.  I will, however, not apologise
for you in the future, even though it was wrong, and I will
forgive you, as I hope that you will forgive me.

I humbly ask that I not be judged by the content of my posts on
alt.politics.democrat.  That is a newsgroup where people go to
work off steam.  This newsgroup is for different purposes, and
my posts will reflect this, as they already have.

It has been a while since I have posted to this group; however, I
have been here in heart if not in body.  Please ask your friend
Baha about The Prophet Jeff and the religion of Fritzianity.

That said, I would appreciate it if I were given the enough
peace that I can return to posting anecdotes about the angels
that I have been blessed with and stop defending myself for
standing up to wrongdoing.
Jeff Mullen - 27 May 2006 19:13 GMT
> <snip>
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> years, of being trolls makes _you_ the rude one. I think you owe Ceryl an
> apology.

Thank you for your attempt to help; however, I can't do that.

There seems to be a clash of cultures here.  I'm going to
explain mine.

My Catholic grandmother brought me up to believe that
Morality is Morality, and that the actions of every person,
no matter their history, are to be judged by the same
standard.  While I bear no ill will, I must remain true to
these tenets.  I must give others the opportunity to repent,
and to inform me of anything that I should repent, if this
is truly the case.  I reserve the right to make this judgement,
as I believe others will judge for themselves the things that
I indicate to them.

It follows that, even when I spell out behavior that I think
is incorrect, I bear no ill will to the person I whom I offer
the opportunity to repent.  People sometimes take my opportunities
to repent as insults; they are never meant that way.  My only
goal is to change the behavior.

It also follows that I cannot permit the worth of any person to
be measured in number of posts.  There is simply too much
more to a person to allow such a simplistic standard to apply.
Finally, it follows that I feel that one should earn one's muster
every time out, though everyone makes mistakes and should be
forgiven for them.  In fact, I am very patient and easy-going
when I am not forced to stand up for myself.

If this level of integrity is too much for you (and it is too
much for many), then by all means add me to your kill file.
I will not compromise my morals--and that is what I perceive
this as trying to make me do--and I will not kowtow to any
authority but One.  That's not going to change.

End of statement of culture.

If I apologise and Ceryl does not, it would be tantamount to an
admission that what she did was right.  It was not.  The way
Ceryl treated me was rude, period--in fact, I think I treated
Ceryl better than Ceryl treated me:  even while she was trying
to pick a fight with me, I indicated that I would not engage
in a flame war.  This is not meant as an insult to Ceryl, but
merely an effort to explain what I believe is going on here.

I mean no insult to you, either, Adrian, but I also feel that
it was wrong to subject me to a double standard.  You went
so far as to edit out Ceryl's post, the material that caused
me to react in the manner that I did.  This is simply not
right.  I feel that, by your standard, you owe me an apology
for this.  Please try not to do this to others in the future.
Adrian A - 27 May 2006 20:16 GMT
<snip>
> I mean no insult to you, either, Adrian, but I also feel that
> it was wrong to subject me to a double standard.  You went
> so far as to edit out Ceryl's post, the material that caused
> me to react in the manner that I did.  This is simply not
> right.  I feel that, by your standard, you owe me an apology
> for this.  Please try not to do this to others in the future.

PLONK
wafflycat - 27 May 2006 22:01 GMT
> PLONK

The religious nut is also in my killfile now.
EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) - 28 May 2006 00:42 GMT
> <snip>
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> PLONK

DITTO!
Monique Y. Mudama - 28 May 2006 01:51 GMT
> It also follows that I cannot permit the worth of any person to be
> measured in number of posts.  There is simply too much more to a
> person to allow such a simplistic standard to apply.  

*sigh*

You crashed a party.  Yes, I know, usenet is for everyone, there's no
moderation on this group, and nothing prevented you from posting.
That being said, people around here know each other well enough that
when someone just appears and suddenly starts posting and accusing
people who have been posting here for years of being trolls ... well,
the fur's going to fly.

You come across as antagonistic and difficult.  Perhaps you're not
aware that in the past, people have posted bogus stories just to mess
with the regulars in this group.  To be frank, I'm still not sure
whether or not this is the case for the originator of this thread.

It feels like you crashed a party and then started lecturing the hosts
on the immorality of whatever dishes they chose.

No one is judged on the number of posts they've made.  Everyone is
judged on the average quality of their posts.  If I see a stock that
has had an upward trend for the last three years straight, I figure
the odds are pretty good that the trend will continue.  If it's had an
upward trend for the two days it's existed, that's not nearly as
reassuring.  And if the first news article coming from the IPO is
about how they disapprove of everything the long-running winner stock
is doing ... well, it reflects poorly on the IPO, not the long-running
stock.

Signature

monique, who spoils Oscar unmercifully

pictures: http://www.bounceswoosh.org/rpca

cybercat - 27 May 2006 16:14 GMT
>> It also follows that I cannot permit the worth of any person to be
>> measured in number of posts.  There is simply too much more to a
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> people who have been posting here for years of being trolls ... well,
> the fur's going to fly.

lol

Now this is priceless. See, Jeff? You thought you were posting to a
global, unmoderated forum called Usenet, but you really stumbled upon
a "private party." Or, more accurately, a bunch of sad freaks who think
that is what it is.

Thanks for straightening him out, Mo. :)
Jeff Mullen - 28 May 2006 10:00 GMT
>>It also follows that I cannot permit the worth of any person to be
>>measured in number of posts.  There is simply too much more to a
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> people who have been posting here for years of being trolls ... well,
> the fur's going to fly.

And yet, these people act as if they can accuse people who are
ostensibly coming to them for help of being trolls with impugnity?
Where do you draw the line?

Remember:  I'm the guy who comes to the rescue of stray cats and
young ladies who post to newsgroups to find nothing but insults
and half-baked prejudgements.  I'm a Western New York Democrat--
and that means that Old Boys' Clubs and me don't mix anyway.

> You come across as antagonistic and difficult.  Perhaps you're not
> aware that in the past, people have posted bogus stories just to mess
> with the regulars in this group.  To be frank, I'm still not sure
> whether or not this is the case for the originator of this thread.

I'm not so much antagonistic as antagonizable.  I will admit that
I sometimes give back to others what they have given to me when I
should try to be more diplomatic, but...I don't give any worse
than I get.  If I take an action that someone doesn't like, you
can rest assured that the same action had already been done to
someone I was defending, and that I didn't like it either.  And
I don't believe in giving special treatment to the Old Boys in
an Old Boys Club.  We Western New York Democrats are like that.
Mind you, I'd like nothing more than to write about My Sweetie
in peace, but, if someone starts pushing my buttons, I'm going
to push back.  I don't start these things.

Speaking as someone who lives in farm country in New York State, I'd
tend to believe her story, BTW.  I've had friends on small farms--though
none of 'em bred dogs--that could easily have been like the on that
this poster described.

> It feels like you crashed a party and then started lecturing the hosts
> on the immorality of whatever dishes they chose.

To some of you, perhaps.  To me, it feels like I walked into a room
full of haughtiness and tried to clear the air.

> No one is judged on the number of posts they've made.  Everyone is
> judged on the average quality of their posts.  If I see a stock that
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> is doing ... well, it reflects poorly on the IPO, not the long-running
> stock.

This is a good analogy, but there are some minor problems
that need to be worked out.

By your analogy, I'm a private firm, not an IPO. I don't care if
the Old Boys put me in their kill files.  So...I'll be opening
for business tomorrow regardless of what the market does.  I'm
not for sale.

That said, I promise to conduct myself according to the highest
standards of my business, as I have been doing.  I'll leave for
much, much later the discussion about investing in that "winner,"
Enron.
Matthew aka NMR - 28 May 2006 17:42 GMT
If you are this guy you are describing  did you you use another display name
or email address. If so they may not recognize you.
Jeff Mullen - 28 May 2006 18:20 GMT
> If you are this guy you are describing  did you you use another display name
> or email address. If so they may not recognize you.

Should I dignify this insult with a substantiative reply?
Matthew aka NMR - 28 May 2006 18:24 GMT
>> If you are this guy you are describing  did you you use another display
>> name or email address. If so they may not recognize you.
>
> Should I dignify this insult with a substantiative reply?

DO we know each other NO  So how could I know if this is you that you are
describing from before

If you want to act like a jerk you will be treated like a jerk
cybercat - 28 May 2006 18:31 GMT
> >> If you are this guy you are describing  did you you use another display
> >> name or email address. If so they may not recognize you.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> If you want to act like a jerk you will be treated like a jerk

You know what happens if you lie with pigs, right, Matthew?
Remember when these people were convinced you were a troll?
Matthew aka NMR - 28 May 2006 18:34 GMT
>> >> If you are this guy you are describing  did you you use another
>> >> display
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> You know what happens if you lie with pigs, right, Matthew?
> Remember when these people were convinced you were a troll?

That is why I am giving him the benefit of the doubt like I did you, Barry
and L   the groups were convinced that all three of you were trolls

But with his last comment it is already leaning to the other side
Jeff Mullen - 30 May 2006 07:41 GMT
>>>>>If you are this guy you are describing  did you you use another
>>>>>display
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> But with his last comment it is already leaning to the other side

OK.  Based on this last exchange, I'll give it another try.  I'm sorry
if I misinterpreted your question as an attempt to abase my character.
It's been a trying few days.  Baha told me that there were good people
on this list.  I didn't expect to find a bunch of 'em going after
someone who had asked for help, and I didn't expect 'em to start going
after me when I tried to smooth things over.  I got a little defensive.

That said, then, my good sir, I have posted only under the name and
email address shown here.  I have spoken with another person who
posts to this list:  Liz Singh, who posts under the name "Baha,"
which is short for her middle name, Bahadur.  She written a sort of
a story and posted it to this newsgroup under the thread title of
"The Prophet."  In that thread, there is a character named "The
Prophet Jeff" who is based on me.  The character and I are not the
same, but we are similar.  I have posted to this newsgroup once or twice
before, but I don't remember whether I used one of my many email
addresses or bummed one off of Liz, because I was using her computer
at the time (I had just fixed the modem for her and was testing
her internet connection for her, among other things).

That is the extent of my involvement in this group.

Again, I apologise for regarding your sincere question as an
insult.  Hopefully, this honest answer can help start the
process of smoothing things over.
Matthew aka NMR - 30 May 2006 16:23 GMT
Well than Welcome to the group Jeff
cybercat - 28 May 2006 18:37 GMT
> If you are this guy you are describing  did you you use another display name
> or email address. If so they may not recognize you.

And who the f.ck cares? If some of the anecdotes regulars want a private
group, there are places where they
can have one. This is USENET. An open forum.

Besides which, who could be stupid enough to think anyone in this
mealy-mouthed group of hypocrites actually
"knows" any of the others? All any of you know is what they choose to
present to you. And with people as consistent dedicated to self
gratification as most of you are, I would not bet the farm on the honesty of
the presentation.

You are beginning to smell like these a.sholes, Matthew. For some reason I
thought you were made of better stuff.

Jeff didn't like the way many in the group replied to the OP and he is
entitled to his opinion. He was also entitled to apologize for any of you
who did not have the sense to
apologize yourselves, if that is how he felt.

Consider this: yelling "troll" at any newcomer is a form of trolling--those
of you who do it are looking for a reaction--you want the poster out of your
face. So Jeff was right, you are the trolls.
Matthew aka NMR - 28 May 2006 18:40 GMT
>> If you are this guy you are describing  did you you use another display
> name
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> You are beginning to smell like these a.sholes, Matthew. For some reason I
> thought you were made of better stuff.

What the f@ck is your problem Cybercat
I asked the man if he used another display name that they may recognized

I don't know if you are having a bad day or what  but do even think you can
take it out on me

> Jeff didn't like the way many in the group replied to the OP and he is
> entitled to his opinion. He was also entitled to apologize for any of you
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> your
> face. So Jeff was right, you are the trolls.
cybercat - 28 May 2006 18:44 GMT
> What the f@ck is your problem Cybercat
>  I asked the man if he used another display name that they may recognized

I am surprised that you are jumping on the bandwagon of fools who want to
know who grill any newcomer to the group, Matthew. I think you are in danger
of becoming an anecdolt.

I flame you out of genuine concern. *meaningful glance*
Matthew aka NMR - 28 May 2006 18:57 GMT
>> What the f@ck is your problem Cybercat
>>  I asked the man if he used another display name that they may recognized
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> I flame you out of genuine concern. *meaningful glance*

Than look in the mirror  YOU ARE ASSUMING AND YOU KNOW WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU
ASSUME

I was the shining light here I asked him if he used another email address
or display name that the group would recognize. If he is who he says he is.
This display name or email address has never posted in this group till the
other day ever.

 http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?show=more&enc_user=A2JvnAsAAAAkr3_8EAL12
qChNCkbeT8r&hl=en&group
=

If I changed my display name completely would anyone recognize me if I
disappeared and came back in a in a year unless I said something
cybercat - 28 May 2006 19:08 GMT
> >> What the f@ck is your problem Cybercat
> >>  I asked the man if he used another display name that they may recognized
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> This display name or email address has never posted in this group till the
> other day ever.

http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?show=more&enc_user=A2JvnAsAAAAkr3_8EAL12
qChNCkbeT8r&hl=en&group
=

> If I changed my display name completely would anyone recognize me if I
> disappeared and came back in a in a year unless I said something

The larger point is, it doesn't matter whether he posted here before, or
whether
any of the warped-out Stepford dolts "recognize" or know him--he is entitled
to
his opinion and may voice it. He was not, as FUBAR MoMo said, "crashing a
private party." This is Usenet. In Usenet, to buy into the mindset that you
have
some little private group thing going is sick. Why? Because it is the
opposite
of private: it is a bunch of exhibitionists who aim for exclusiveness while
displaying their most private information ad nauseum in a public forum.

This has been a public service announcement. I feel it is my public duty
to give these idiots an reality check every now and then. Sorry if it
offends
you, Matthew. On the other hand, finding yourself easily offended in Usenet
is one of the first signs that you may be becoming one of them--the Pod
People
of "I'm Okay, You're Okay, and to-hell-with-the-Cats-if-they-Get in the-Way"
Anecdolts.
Matthew aka NMR - 28 May 2006 19:16 GMT
>> >> What the f@ck is your problem Cybercat
>> >>  I asked the man if he used another display name that they may
[quoted text clipped - 50 lines]
> the-Way"
> Anecdolts.

I am far from easily offended.  I just wanted to know what the problem was
with 2 internet friends.  If you were having a bad day I was not going to be
a target.
I am not in the interest anymore to be arguing.  I have more important
things to do than get in flame wars or debates or arguments.  As you noticed
in the other group I just drop out and was done with it.  I am to old and to
much in good moods all the time to be annoyed on the internet anymore.  John
Doe is the only exception he is a perfect target.

Mine was a innocent post that looks to have been taken out of context.  I
was giving the benefit  of the doubt but neither here nor there.  People can
take it as they like  If I have to go back to doing what I do I will.
BulletProof - 28 May 2006 19:39 GMT
> I am not in the interest anymore to be arguing.

what is THAT supposed to mean!

btw! what in THE HELL are you doing over here on the short bus?

you think cause these women are a little slow you're gonna get some
pussy Matt?

they got laws about fondling challenged women

uh... you are here for the women aint' you..
Matthew aka NMR - 28 May 2006 19:40 GMT
>> I am not in the interest anymore to be arguing.
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> uh... you are here for the women aint' you..

How else Am I to be know as a dirty old man ;-)
BulletProof - 28 May 2006 20:28 GMT
> How else Am I to be know as a dirty old man ;-)

I can vouch for you Matt!

lemme know if anybody gives you any crap or don't co-operate
I can prescribe more shock therapy for them

it's a firedrill matt! lets freak everybody out, this oughtta get your
a few beaver shots
cybercat - 28 May 2006 19:41 GMT
"Matthew aka NMR" <catslave@antispam.com> wrote>

>  John  Doe is the only exception he is a perfect target.

We agree on that!

> Mine was a innocent post that looks to have been taken out of context.

If I did that, I apologize. I may have gotten you wrong.

I am not having a bad day, Matthew, I am having a good day!

On bad days I am quiet and subdued, on good days I am full of
p*ss and vinegar. Or .... something. : D

Whatcha doing for Memorial Day dinner? And why don't you
post in the cooking group, they are an amusing bunch of people.
More than enough freaks to go around there!
Matthew aka NMR - 28 May 2006 20:04 GMT
> "Matthew aka NMR" <catslave@antispam.com> wrote>
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> If I did that, I apologize. I may have gotten you wrong.

Excepted  and never take me at face vaule please I have a lot of hidden
talents and  other things  at least my mother told me so :-)

> I am not having a bad day, Matthew, I am having a good day!
>
> On bad days I am quiet and subdued, on good days I am full of
> p*ss and vinegar. Or .... something. : D

<EVIL LAUGH>

> Whatcha doing for Memorial Day dinner? And why don't you
> post in the cooking group, they are an amusing bunch of people.
> More than enough freaks to go around there!

   Tomorrow we are doing a crawfish, shrimp, mussel  seafood boil. Clams
Italiano has been requested by the DW.  Basically a clam bake I had to get a
permit to have the clam bake due to the forest fires near by luckily I have
a fire fighter that is coming to the party tomorrow so that is covered.

    Going to cook up some turkey burgers , turkey franks with my avocado
honey mustard relish, with Swiss cheese melted on them.  Going to make up a
harvest salad.  Got some watermelon in the frig chilling.  Going to bake a
Spanish bar cake, some double chocolate chip cookies and have some ice cream
for dessert of course

And that last line is why I want nothing to do with the groups  too many
already in the cat groups why deal with them also
Jo Firey - 28 May 2006 20:21 GMT
>    Tomorrow we are doing a crawfish, shrimp, mussel  seafood boil. Clams
> Italiano has been requested by the DW.  Basically a clam bake I had to get
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> a Spanish bar cake, some double chocolate chip cookies and have some ice
> cream for dessert of course

Dang, that sounds good.  I may try to get away with chips, salsa and
margaritas.

The kids have been gone all weekend, and we almost have the laundry done and
the house cleaned up.  With a little luck we will spend tomorrow getting the
yard cleaned up.

The weather is perfect so I'd rather spend time with the dog and the cats
than in the kitchen.

Current project, teaching Kayla to sit quietly while a cat walks across the
room.  She will sit and she will stay, but only without too many
distractions.  She considers them a HUGE distraction.  Especially Jake who
will not walk across the room without stopping to hiss at her.

Jo
Matthew aka NMR - 28 May 2006 20:27 GMT
How is in the kitchen this will all be outside

>>    Tomorrow we are doing a crawfish, shrimp, mussel  seafood boil. Clams
>> Italiano has been requested by the DW.  Basically a clam bake I had to
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> Jo
cybercat - 28 May 2006 20:55 GMT
> > Whatcha doing for Memorial Day dinner? And why don't you
> > post in the cooking group, they are an amusing bunch of people.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> permit to have the clam bake due to the forest fires near by luckily I have
> a fire fighter that is coming to the party tomorrow so that is covered.

Yum yum!

>      Going to cook up some turkey burgers , turkey franks with my avocado
> honey mustard relish, with Swiss cheese melted on them.  Going to make up a
> harvest salad.  Got some watermelon in the frig chilling.  Going to bake a
> Spanish bar cake, some double chocolate chip cookies and have some ice cream
> for dessert of course

It all sounds good but I am not sure about the turkey burgers, are they
good?

> And that last line is why I want nothing to do with the groups  too many
> already in the cat groups why deal with them also

Because you are a cook!
Matthew aka NMR - 28 May 2006 21:13 GMT
>> > Whatcha doing for Memorial Day dinner? And why don't you
>> > post in the cooking group, they are an amusing bunch of people.
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> It all sounds good but I am not sure about the turkey burgers, are they
> good?

Yes they are all food is good no matter the taste it is up to the chef to
prepare it right
I don't like turkey bacon but I found a way to get around the taste. I put
it in my smoker and add some oak and maple chips with some sun dried cherry
wood  gives it a very unique smoky flavor.

Try it once add some swiss cheese to it  the burger add sea salt to it when
seasoning maybe some old bay or rosemary some fresh oregano

>> And that last line is why I want nothing to do with the groups  too many

>> already in the cat groups why deal with them also
>
> Because you are a cook!

Maybe I will try lurking over there for a bit
Rhonda - 29 May 2006 05:20 GMT
> The larger point is, it doesn't matter whether he posted here
> before, or whether any of the warped-out Stepford dolts "recognize"
>  or know him--he is entitled to his opinion and may voice it. He
> was not, as FUBAR MoMo said, "crashing a private party." This is
> Usenet. In Usenet, to buy into the mindset that you have some
> little private group thing going is sick. Why? Because it is the opposite

> of private: it is a bunch of exhibitionists who aim for
> exclusiveness while displaying their most private information ad
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> you may be becoming one of them--the Pod People of "I'm Okay,
> You're Okay, and to-hell-with-the-Cats-if-they-Get in the-Way" Anecdolts.

I think she said "crashed a party," without the word "private." I took
her post to mean that people know each other and if someone news comes
in and starts calling regulars trolls, "the fur is going to fly."

I didn't follow all of the lead-up to that post, but I didn't get from
that post that the group is exclusive or private.

Plus, whatever she posts is her opinion and she can put whatever she
likes on usenet, right?  :)

It's a good thing to have all of these different groups with different
flavors, don't you think? It would be boring if they all were the same.

Rhonda
Monique Y. Mudama - 29 May 2006 05:47 GMT
> > The larger point is, it doesn't matter whether he posted here
> > before, or whether any of the warped-out Stepford dolts
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> different flavors, don't you think? It would be boring if they all
> were the same.

Bah, I had whatsername KF'd and then you go and make me read it
anyway.  By the way, whatsername knows all of the above, but she just
can't help herself from posting.  It's surely some form of mental
illness, and as such should be treated with compassion, preferably by
professionals using lots of medication and perhaps electroshock
therapy.

I kind of like the moniker "FUBAR MoMo" -- can I keep it?  It makes me
giggle, because a college friend used to call me Momo.

As for FUBAR, well, I don't think I'm beyond all recognition *grin*

Whatsername's obsession with the fact that newsgroups are open to
everyone makes me snicker, too.  Duh.  I hope no one is under the
illusion that anything they post here is confidential.  So, for example,
if I want to call whatsername a self-aggrandizing repetitive bitch, I
should be aware that anyone in the world could see this message,
possibly years after I posted it.

Now, you ask, if she hates everyone on rpca so much, why does she post
here?  Yeah, I don't get it either.  Personally, I prefer to spend my
time with people whose company I enjoy.

Now watch her go off on a rant about how people who use killfiles are
weak.  I love that one.

Can Mary say "broken record"?

Signature

monique, who spoils Oscar unmercifully

pictures: http://www.bounceswoosh.org/rpca

cybercat - 29 May 2006 06:02 GMT
> Bah, I had whatsername KF'd and then you go and make me read it
> anyway.  By the way, whatsername knows all of the above, but she just
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> As for FUBAR, well, I don't think I'm beyond all recognition *grin*

When you told the story about leaving the stray declawed cat outside
overnight even though there are coyotes etc. that could easily kill it
because Eric did not want you to allow it in the house, even in the
garage, even in the bathroom, I understood that you are absolutely
f.cked up beyond all recognition. You have a functioning brain but
no backbone. You're more pathetic than most because you know
right from wrong.

You're just sad, Monique. I cannot imagine how you can look at your
face in the mirror.
Matthew aka NMR - 29 May 2006 05:50 GMT
> > The larger point is, it doesn't matter whether he posted here
> > before, or whether any of the warped-out Stepford dolts "recognize"
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>
> Rhonda

Choice is something ever American and person in the world takes for granted
everyday.  It is something that a single step can change your future, a
single word can change your destiny.  Every day is choice and I am happy to
be able to do that.  If  we were all the same, all did the same thing, all
wanted the same thing what would our cats be like.  There is a thought to
ponder.

Everyone should be welcomed into our lives, this newsgroups as long as they
don't preach harm or evil or do either in real life.  Maybe  I am dreaming
but ain't it a nice dream to have
cybercat - 29 May 2006 06:12 GMT
>  >
>  > The larger point is, it doesn't matter whether he posted here
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> her post to mean that people know each other and if someone news comes
> in and starts calling regulars trolls, "the fur is going to fly."

Did you? Well, good! Monique did not say "private," of course. But if
it were a public party then everyone would be welcome, right? And of
course, anyone who has perused these groups for more than, say, 60
days must know that the term "troll" is meaningless.

> I didn't follow all of the lead-up to that post, but I didn't get from
> that post that the group is exclusive or private.
>
> Plus, whatever she posts is her opinion and she can put whatever she
> likes on usenet, right?  :)

She can and she does. But reprimanding someone for posting his opinion
on Usenet, in an unmoderated group, by telling him that he "crashed a party"
is absurd. Monique is a miserable simpering borderline OCD cat-abusing
piece of spineless caca. Who has found a fabulous home here in Anecdolts.
And over the last two years or so has progressed far enough to raiser her
rubber sword and whine that someone who is protesting the regulars' usual
branding of a newcomer a "troll" is "crashing a party." All that considered,
your comment does not follow from mine. Were you thinking I was trying to
censor Momo? Nooooo, not at all. I was simply pointing out what an a.shole
she is.

> It's a good thing to have all of these different groups with different
> flavors, don't you think? It would be boring if they all were the same.

It *is* all the same--same old neurotic lamers clinging to a Usenet group
as though it is a private club, throttling the new and/or different, all
that
sh.t. What would be interesting would be lots of neat cat anecdotes, instead
of "purrs needed, I have to get my teeth filled, purrs needed, I have a
vaginal infection ..."

Ugh.
Rhonda - 30 May 2006 07:26 GMT
> All that considered,
> your comment does not follow from mine. Were you thinking I was trying to
> censor Momo? Nooooo, not at all. I was simply pointing out what an a.shole
> she is.

Not censor. I thought of it as she was giving her opinion of his post,
maybe him in general. You are giving your opinion of her post, maybe her
in general.

Opinions are welcomed on usenet, right?


> It *is* all the same--same old neurotic lamers clinging to a Usenet group
> as though it is a private club, throttling the new and/or different, all
> that
> sh.t. What would be interesting would be lots of neat cat anecdotes, instead
> of "purrs needed, I have to get my teeth filled, purrs needed, I have a
> vaginal infection ..."

I realize many people use this group as a support group -- much more
than just for cats. I am surprised at the level of personal issues on
here every day, but we can just chose to read what we want to read, right?

I usually skip most of the personal things, but I don't think that stuff
is harmful unless your boss or a family member reads it (which is always
 possible on an open forum.) It does make for a lot of clutter if
you're looking for cat anecdotes, but it's no big deal, at least not to me.

Rhonda
Monique Y. Mudama - 30 May 2006 14:43 GMT
> I realize many people use this group as a support group -- much more
> than just for cats. I am surprised at the level of personal issues
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> clutter if you're looking for cat anecdotes, but it's no big deal,
> at least not to me.

Have you actually read the RPCA FAQ?  It might make a lot of things
clear.

Signature

monique, who spoils Oscar unmercifully

pictures: http://www.bounceswoosh.org/rpca

Matthew aka NMR - 30 May 2006 16:25 GMT
>> I realize many people use this group as a support group -- much more
>> than just for cats. I am surprised at the level of personal issues
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Have you actually read the RPCA FAQ?  It might make a lot of things
> clear.

Only one problem with a FAQ  they make no difference in a unmoderated public
group no matter what they say in them.  An ISP will only take action against
a user for spam, porn and still than it may not
Monique Y. Mudama - 30 May 2006 18:10 GMT
>>> I realize many people use this group as a support group -- much
>>> more than just for cats. I am surprised at the level of personal
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> will only take action against a user for spam, porn and still than
> it may not

Who said anything about taking action?  When people express surprise
at the fact that members of the group talk about things other than
cats, it's clear they haven't read the FAQ.

Anyway, as some folks love to point out, the group isn't moderated.
That doesn't just mean that people can show up here and troll, insult
others, and generally be a pain in the a.s.  It also means that people
who want to share their experiences with others in the group may do
so.  Oddly enough, "I can post anything I want" doesn't only apply to
the people who like to stir sh.t up.

http://www.angelfire.com/mt/yowie/catfaq.htm

specifically

http://www.angelfire.com/mt/yowie/pages/customs.htm#NotAboutCats

6.1.5 Darn it, half these posts aren't even about cats!

That's what happens when friends start to have a conversation - you
can start on one topic, and the conversation drifts so far that within
10 minutes you are talking about something else entirely and you
didn't even notice the change.

Occasionally people notice and put an [OT] in the subject line to
signify that the post is Off Topic (ie, not about cats), but not always.
Just think of this group as a bunch of people that became friends
because of their cats. It makes it easier to understand the style and
content of the posts, particularly the ones that are technically off
topic. Would you tell one of your friends to shut up if he just
announced his engagement?

Signature

monique, who spoils Oscar unmercifully

pictures: http://www.bounceswoosh.org/rpca

cybercat - 30 May 2006 17:36 GMT
> > I realize many people use this group as a support group -- much more
> > than just for cats. I am surprised at the level of personal issues
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Have you actually read the RPCA FAQ?  It might make a lot of things
> clear.

lol! Idiot.
cybercat - 30 May 2006 17:48 GMT
> > All that considered,
> > your comment does not follow from mine. Were you thinking I was trying to
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>   possible on an open forum.) It does make for a lot of clutter if
> you're looking for cat anecdotes, but it's no big deal, at least not to me.

I don't mind any of it, though I find it painful to watch. What I do mind is
the lynchmob attitude they all display when someone new comes in who
does not kiss their flabby a.ses. Like Jeff, for example.

As for your comments about Barry? You have never looked uglier.
"Deep-seated problems," eh? Does this mean you don't like his posts?
Don't enjoy his sense of humor? Don't like his style of writing? If so, say
so--because I have liked you in the past, but that condescending,
pseudo-psychologist tone is nauseating, particularly since you are
talking about someone whose intellect and creativity are things to
which you would never even aspire, let alone attain. And he pisses
me off on a regular basis.

As for Sherry? I have emails from her blasting this group for the very
things I blast it for. Complete with snorts of derision, and comments
intended to egg me on at poking fun at them. They are from a couple
of years ago, before she Got Saved. She has denied sending them too,
but there they are. Hypocrites are just so f.cking ugly, and so spineless.
I can find nothing redeeming in Sherry's behavior.
Rhonda - 31 May 2006 00:42 GMT
> I don't mind any of it, though I find it painful to watch. What I do mind is
> the lynchmob attitude they all display when someone new comes in who
> does not kiss their flabby a.ses. Like Jeff, for example.

Jeff struck me as a guy more interested in apologizing for his
underlings, rather than speaking for himself.


> As for your comments about Barry? You have never looked uglier.

Well, I did just mow the lawn. I need to jump in the shower.

> "Deep-seated problems," eh? Does this mean you don't like his posts?
> Don't enjoy his sense of humor? Don't like his style of writing?

He reminds me of a kid jumping up and down and waving at grown-ups to
get attention. At his age, and I'm assuming he's an adult, I think he
has problems. He seems to go out of his way to antagonize people and I
just don't see the humor in that.

>If so, say

> so--because I have liked you in the past, but that condescending,
> pseudo-psychologist tone is nauseating, particularly since you are
> talking about someone whose intellect and creativity are things to
> which you would never even aspire, let alone attain.

You're not so bad at the condescending thing yourself.

> And he pisses me off on a regular basis.

I used to read his posts but he was just too over-the-top. It seemed
like after less people responded to him, the more he started jumping up
and down, changing screen names, jumping some more.


> As for Sherry? I have emails from her blasting this group for the very
> things I blast it for. Complete with snorts of derision, and comments
> intended to egg me on at poking fun at them. They are from a couple
> of years ago, before she Got Saved. She has denied sending them too,
> but there they are. Hypocrites are just so f.cking ugly, and so spineless.
> I can find nothing redeeming in Sherry's behavior.

Where was anyone talking about Sherry? I don't know about her history and private

emails from two years ago, but I enjoy her posts.

Does this mean coffee is off?  :)

Rhonda
cybercat - 30 May 2006 17:45 GMT
>> I don't mind any of it, though I find it painful to watch. What I do mind
>> is
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
>
> Does this mean coffee is off?  :)

Of course not! And, yes, even as I hit the "send" button, I realized I had a
bit
of PKB going on there with the "condescending" comment. I do that, I do.
BUT I don't actually believe in my superiority, I just like to piss people
off.
(I cannot decide which is worse ...)

Nevertheless, my dear friend Barry is a creative genius with a very unusual
communication style. I know him fairly well, and I don't think he has any
problems
more serious than most of us. With regard to attention-seeking behavior:
nobody
here is posting so nobody will notice them. There are different types of
attention
-seeking behavior. I like the creative, funny kind more than the "I backed
over
my child in the driveway, poor meeeeeee, I didn't get the disability I
applied
for, purrrs for poor meeeeee" type.

Different strokes.

Thank you for pointing out my own hypocrisy. An admirable deed. :)
mnemonic - 31 May 2006 00:52 GMT
> He reminds me of a kid jumping up and down and waving at grown-ups to
> get attention. At his age, and I'm assuming he's an adult, I think he
> has problems. He seems to go out of his way to antagonize people and I
> just don't see the humor in that.

YOU GOT WHAT YOU PAID FOR NOW HUSH UP
Christina Websell - 30 May 2006 00:13 GMT
> > The larger point is, it doesn't matter whether he posted here
> > before, or whether any of the warped-out Stepford dolts "recognize"
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> > You're Okay, and to-hell-with-the-Cats-if-they-Get in the-Way"
> > Anecdolts.

You are annoyed because when you post nastiness we don't appreciate it.  Why
would we?  AFAIC you are welcome here to post in the spirit of rpca.
Otherwise please go back to h&b where it seems to be acceptable to slag
everyone off and get aggressive.

> I think she said "crashed a party," without the word "private." I took her
> post to mean that people know each other and if someone news comes in and
> starts calling regulars trolls, "the fur is going to fly."
>
> I didn't follow all of the lead-up to that post, but I didn't get from
> that post that the group is exclusive or private.

The group is *not* exclusive or private.  We welcome anyone in the world who
wants to share anecdotes about their cats.  What we *don't* like is people
posting like cybercat.  Rude, confrontational, no
empathy and back in my killfile.

Tweed

> Plus, whatever she posts is her opinion and she can put whatever she
> likes on usenet, right?  :)
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Rhonda
Singh - 29 May 2006 04:09 GMT
Jeff's OP on this thread is, to my knowledge, his first posting here. I know, because I'm the one who told him
about the group last week. Let me take the blame for offense, and offer apology to those who felt the slings
and arrows.

I know he is a man who loves animals in general and cats in particular with a depth that many have never seen
in others; Jeff made a twenty-mile drive last week to bring us cat litter because a glitch in my disability
payment had kept me without an income for two months, and Louie's check had gone all to bills or we would have
been toast. I think he might have cried worse that Louie and me when we sent Fritzie over the Bridge. Jeff
doesn't always come across like a Dale Carnegie graduate. But then, who among us hasn't made a verbal gaffe
among strangers and pissed off people the first time around? I have, my husband has, and so have a good many
others. I don't mean any disrespect to those who felt slighted. And I sure don't want to take sides. I'm sorry
about this explosion.

Blessed be,
Baha

> >> What the f@ck is your problem Cybercat
> >>  I asked the man if he used another display name that they may recognized
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> If I changed my display name completely would anyone recognize me if I
> disappeared and came back in a in a year unless I said something
Candace - 29 May 2006 04:41 GMT
> Jeff's OP on this thread is, to my knowledge, his first posting here. I know, because I'm the one who told him
> about the group last week. Let me take the blame for offense, and offer apology to those who felt the slings
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Blessed be,
> Baha

Sounds like a very nice guy.  I found him kind of refreshing for rpca
but, then, I'm partial to rpchb, too.  I hope he didn't get scared off.
It should be amusing to see some of the regulars backpedal now that
they know he came at your invitation since I know everyone seems to
like you.

Candace
Singh - 29 May 2006 05:00 GMT
> Sounds like a very nice guy.  I found him kind of refreshing for rpca
> but, then, I'm partial to rpchb, too.  I hope he didn't get scared off.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> I hope so. I'm afraid I'm going to be spanked off here with a paddle worthy of "Animal House"!

Blessed be,
Baha
Monique Y. Mudama - 29 May 2006 05:15 GMT
> Sounds like a very nice guy.  I found him kind of refreshing for
> rpca but, then, I'm partial to rpchb, too.  I hope he didn't get
> scared off.  It should be amusing to see some of the regulars
> backpedal now that they know he came at your invitation since I know
> everyone seems to like you.

I figured out that he was Baha's ex a bunch of posts back.  I still
think that he didn't choose the wisest way to introduce himself.  As
they say, you catch more flies with honey.  Even if you disagree with
someone vehemently, you're far more likely to reach them by being nice
than by insulting them.  It's very rare that someone will change their
minds because you browbeat them.

Not that that's always kept me off my high horse, but I do try.

Signature

monique, who spoils Oscar unmercifully

pictures: http://www.bounceswoosh.org/rpca

cybercat - 29 May 2006 06:30 GMT
> > Sounds like a very nice guy.  I found him kind of refreshing for
> > rpca but, then, I'm partial to rpchb, too.  I hope he didn't get
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> I figured out that he was Baha's ex a bunch of posts back.  I still
> think that he didn't choose the wisest way to introduce himself.

Nobody gives a sh.t, Monique.
Jeff Mullen - 30 May 2006 08:08 GMT
>>Sounds like a very nice guy.  I found him kind of refreshing for
>>rpca but, then, I'm partial to rpchb, too.  I hope he didn't get
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Not that that's always kept me off my high horse, but I do try.

I wasn't scared off.  :)  :)  :)  But I'd like to set the record
straight on one small score:  I wasn't the one who started the
brow beating.  I let myself get caught up in it, and I recprocated,
but I didn't actually start it.  If you'll check the first post
I made, you will see that it was actually pretty darned polite.
It was meant for a young lady who had posted to this group asking
for help and found a browbeating.  Then--take a look for yourself--
some of the people who were browbeating the young lady in question
started browbeating me.  All I did was respond in kind.

After that, things get a little bit POVish.  MY POV is that I was
asked to treat one of the browbeaters as if her excrement had no
odor, and, when I refused, a couple of people "PLONK"ed me for
for it.  In the interest of light over heat, I'll end the story
there.

It is said that sometimes friends fight when they first meet, as
this is actually a manner of negotiation.  Let's hope that we can
negotiate a little more light and a little less heat.  I, for
one, would be quite happy with that state of affairs.

Jeff

P.S.  About that driving 20 miles thing...ummmm...there's a writer's
group that meets near where Liz lives, and it was a meeting day.  I
was going to be in the neighborhood anyway.  I DID shell out my own
cash to make sure that their cats wouldn't be stepping in it, but
that was a small price to pay.
cybercat - 30 May 2006 17:55 GMT
> I wasn't scared off.  :)  :)  :)  But I'd like to set the record
> straight on one small score:  I wasn't the one who started the
> brow beating.  I let myself get caught up in it, and I recprocated,
> but I didn't actually start it.

None of this matters, Jeff. The point is, you are supposed to follow
the crowd. And if you don't, the pussies here unleash their impotent
fury on you. Victor will even get all huffy and call you the C-word and
hurl one of his featherweight loafers at you.

Wahahaha!
Baha - 30 May 2006 20:36 GMT
I know it was writers' night, but you did not have to shell out for the kitty
litter. You did that out of your own goodness even though i know you're
strapped. I'm sorry if it came off as exaggeration, but frankly you were out
here for the writing, not to shlep me around for litter. Louie and I and the
cats remain indebted.

>>>Sounds like a very nice guy.  I found him kind of refreshing for
>>>rpca but, then, I'm partial to rpchb, too.  I hope he didn't get
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>cash to make sure that their cats wouldn't be stepping in it, but
>that was a small price to pay.
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 29 May 2006 10:54 GMT
> Sounds like a very nice guy.  I found him kind of refreshing for rpca
> but, then, I'm partial to rpchb, too.  I hope he didn't get scared off.
> It should be amusing to see some of the regulars backpedal now that
> they know he came at your invitation since I know everyone seems to
> like you.

What do you get out of rpca, Candace?

Joyce
cybercat - 29 May 2006 18:23 GMT
>  > Sounds like a very nice guy.  I found him kind of refreshing for rpca
>  > but, then, I'm partial to rpchb, too.  I hope he didn't get scared off.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> What do you get out of rpca, Candace?

My bet is, she finds it fascinating, like a train wreck. You don't
want to look, but you can't quite believe how terrible it really is,
so you have to.

Me, I just like to point out hypocrisy and poke idiots with shallow
agendas with sticks. Where is the hypocrisy? Cats are secondary
here, despite the name of the group. They are secondary to all of
you feeling goooood about your lame selves; second to the
exhibitionist, mutual masturbation sessions many of you have here every day,
secondary to your convenience. Yes, many of you. To not speak out
against, for example, "Yowie's complete failure to adequately address
an aggression problem brought about by her own neglect, indicates
tacit acceptance.
Candace - 29 May 2006 23:44 GMT
>  > Sounds like a very nice guy.  I found him kind of refreshing for rpca
>  > but, then, I'm partial to rpchb, too.  I hope he didn't get scared off.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Joyce

Hmmm, I 'd have to say I mostly read rpca when things are slow on
rpchb, as they have been lately.  I like to get my cat fix everyday and
rpchb doesn't always provide that.  As you know, there are many people
who do post to both rpca and rpchb so I do see familiar names here.  I
don't post here much, though, because rpca just does not appeal to me
on many levels as much as rpchb does.  I know there are plenty of nice
people here and I know OT stuff is very much encouraged but I guess
it's a little too sweet and perfect for me most of the time here;
hence, my rarity of postings.

To me, rpchb isn't evil and filled with a bunch of ranting egomaniacs
which seems to be the opinion of many rpca'ers.  It's more like real
life where you can actually say what you want instead of having to
sugarcoat everything and tread lightly like you do here.   I understand
your premise for this group and obviously everyone is free to ignore or
dislike whoever they want but you do all seem a little cliquey and as
though you don't really want any new blood unless they tow the line
and, even then, it seems like they have to prove themselves for quite
awhile before they're accepted.

It's not that I love to flame nor do most of the people who post on
rpchb but, yes, flamewars do break out (like they do even here
sometimes!!!!!!) and differing opinions can get heated but, what's
wrong with that?  Here a differing opinion is barely tolerated and it's
all about being sweet and loving to everyone regardless of what
awful/silly/stupid/wrong/poorly executed thing they might have done.
If anyone criticizes a decision or remark made by a regular, they get
plonked and recipe-ed.

On rpchb, people might get yelled at but I've seen former "enemies"
become friendly and people actually back down and apologize or others
admit that they were wrong to begin with and still others admit that
they have learned something valuable about cats.  A disagreement is
allowed to play out there rather than get swept under the rug.

It's just a matter of personal preferences, I guess, but I do enjoy
reading some of the posts here and posting occasionally myself.

Candace
sriddles@aol.com - 30 May 2006 00:06 GMT