Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / Cat Anecdotes / April 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Yes, there *are* cat-friendly landlords

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Dan M - 17 Apr 2006 04:53 GMT
When Nancy and I were looking for a rental property 4 years ago (it's hard
to believe we've been here this long) we had an awful time finding a place
that was big enough for us and would allow our three (at that time)
kitties. We were delighted to finally find this place.

We're in one unit of a four-unit complex, arranged as two duplexes. Both
units in the other building are now vacant, and the the other unit in our
building will be vacant in a month or so. I was talking to the landlord
last week and learned his plans regarding the vacant units.

John knows that we are feeding two outside kitties in addition to our
indoor fur-family. He says that he is going to give preference to other
kitty-families when screening other potential renters :)
Marina - 17 Apr 2006 04:59 GMT
> When Nancy and I were looking for a rental property 4 years ago (it's hard
> to believe we've been here this long) we had an awful time finding a place
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> indoor fur-family. He says that he is going to give preference to other
> kitty-families when screening other potential renters :)

Wow! That's wonderful. I hope you get many interesting new kitty
neighbours. My landlord is pretty good, too. He didn't baulk when I said
I had three cats (at the time), and when I asked if I could build an
enclosure in the garden, he said go right ahead.

Signature

Marina, Miranda and Caliban. In loving memory of Frank and Nikki.
Stories and pics at http://koti.welho.com/mkurten/
Pics at http://uk.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/frankiennikki/
and http://community.webshots.com/user/frankiennikki

EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) - 17 Apr 2006 20:14 GMT
> Wow! That's wonderful. I hope you get many interesting new kitty
> neighbours. My landlord is pretty good, too. He didn't baulk when I said
> I had three cats (at the time), and when I asked if I could build an
> enclosure in the garden, he said go right ahead.

I have a feeling Eropeans are a bit more sensitive to the
needs of our fellow coreatures.  I remember my first trip to
Europe (with a tour group) our bus was travelling along the
autobahn between Prague and Vienna (or maybe Vienna and
Budapest - I don't remember for sure).   I noticed all these
sort of "bridges" across the freeway, all with long grass,
etc.  They plainly were not for cars, so I asked about them.
 The tour guide replied "Oh, those are for animals".  When
I said something about the difficult of herding cattle
across them, she made it clear they were for the safe
passage of ANY animals.  (When I remembered a news story
from the prvious summer, about deer and other wild animals
trapped by freeway fences to die in a hillside brush fire
here, I was ashamed of my fellow Americans.)

Signature

NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth

jmcquown - 17 Apr 2006 05:40 GMT
> When Nancy and I were looking for a rental property 4 years ago (it's
> hard to believe we've been here this long) we had an awful time
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> indoor fur-family. He says that he is going to give preference to
> other kitty-families when screening other potential renters :)

Hope you get some cat-friendly neighbors soon!  I used to work with a woman
who tried to get an apartment in this complex but when she told the
apartment manager she had five cats she was told no.

But the thing is, this woman was a nutcase.  She used to use her cats as an
excuse to not show up for work.  She'd call and say one of her cats escaped,
or she tripped over her cat and hurt herself.  After she was fired she
started calling her old extension at the office and leaving obscene messages
for the poor new guy who inherited her old phone number.  And when she came
to pick up her stuff at the office she brought a police escort because she
said she felt "threatened".  Huh?  Yeah, she was a nut.  I'm glad the
apartment manager spotted that.

Jill
Pat - 17 Apr 2006 05:48 GMT
> Hope you get some cat-friendly neighbors soon!  I used to work with a
> woman
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> said she felt "threatened".  Huh?  Yeah, she was a nut.  I'm glad the
> apartment manager spotted that.

If it takes only five cats to be a nut, with seven I must be a nut tree
then.
Matthew AKA NMR - 17 Apr 2006 05:58 GMT
>> Hope you get some cat-friendly neighbors soon!  I used to work with a
>> woman
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> If it takes only five cats to be a nut, with seven I must be a nut tree
> then.

I belong in a padded room if that was true :-)
Magic Mood Jeep© - 17 Apr 2006 12:35 GMT
>>> Hope you get some cat-friendly neighbors soon!  I used to work with
>>> a woman
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>>
> I belong in a padded room if that was true :-)

They locked me up and threw away the key long ago... LOL
jmcquown - 17 Apr 2006 05:58 GMT
>> Hope you get some cat-friendly neighbors soon!  I used to work with a
>> woman
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> If it takes only five cats to be a nut, with seven I must be a nut
> tree then.

But Pat, I'll bet you never called and harrassed some poor guy you'd never
met who simply inherited your phone number by the luck of the draw at the
office, did you?  I mean, it was really rude, foul stuff she was saying.
F*** me!  Give me that big hard ****.  Stuff like that.  And the poor guy
was like, "OH MY GOD!  You guys, listen to this!"  Her voice was very
distinctive; we all knew immediately who it was.  We felt so sorry for him.

It wasn't the cats that made her nuts.  I felt sorry for the cats, too.
Wouldn't have wanted her for a neighbor, cats or no cats.

Jill
Pat - 17 Apr 2006 06:28 GMT
> But Pat, I'll bet you never called and harrassed some poor guy you'd never
> met who simply inherited your phone number by the luck of the draw at the
> office, did you?  I mean, it was really rude, foul stuff she was saying.
> F*** me!  Give me that big hard ****.

I don't know too many guys who would take offense at hearing that from a
woman....
EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) - 17 Apr 2006 20:17 GMT
>>But Pat, I'll bet you never called and harrassed some poor guy you'd never
>>met who simply inherited your phone number by the luck of the draw at the
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> I don't know too many guys who would take offense at hearing that from a
> woman....

Perhaps it depends upon the woman?  (And at your office????)

Signature

NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth

jmcquown - 18 Apr 2006 05:12 GMT
>>> But Pat, I'll bet you never called and harrassed some poor guy
>>> you'd never met who simply inherited your phone number by the luck
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Perhaps it depends upon the woman?  (And at your office????)

Particularly at the office!  This guy blushed to the roots as he played
these messages from his voicemail.  The nutcase called practically every
night to leave obscene messages for him.
Tanada - 23 Apr 2006 22:38 GMT
>>But Pat, I'll bet you never called and harrassed some poor guy you'd never
>>met who simply inherited your phone number by the luck of the draw at the
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> I don't know too many guys who would take offense at hearing that from a
> woman....

I know a lot of guys who would either find it offensive or embarrassing.
 Rob would have told her to get help before hanging up on her.

Pam S.
Jane - 18 Apr 2006 15:11 GMT
>But Pat, I'll bet you never called and harrassed some poor guy you'd never
>met who simply inherited your phone number by the luck of the draw at the
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>It wasn't the cats that made her nuts.  I felt sorry for the cats, too.
>Wouldn't have wanted her for a neighbor, cats or no cats.

And on the opposite end of the crazy scale, one of my friends has a
boyfriend who was terribly abused during his childhood. I've never heard
most of the details, but as an adult he started keeping pet cats, and
she thinks that the 'owners' are one of the things that's helped him get
over his horrible childhood and be as normal as he presently is.  From
knowing almost no love as a child, he now has total unconditional love
from his cats.  There's only one right now, but he's had several who
lived long spoiled lives with him.

Jane
- owned and operated by Princess Rita
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 18 Apr 2006 22:25 GMT
> And on the opposite end of the crazy scale, one of my friends has a
> boyfriend who was terribly abused during his childhood. I've never heard
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> knowing almost no love as a child, he now has total unconditional love
> from his cats.

That's a sweet story. I can relate to this a bit myself. I wouldn't say
I was "terribly" abused, but my parents were very young and had a lot of
emotional problems when I was born, so there was lots screaming and
yelling and emotional chaos, and not enough of the kind of positive,
loving attention that a child needs. But we always had cats, and I bonded
with them. Cats were safe to love. They didn't always give me their
attention when I wanted it, but when they did, it was soooooo soothing.
Nothing like a purring cat when you're a lonely kid.

Joyce
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 17 Apr 2006 07:13 GMT
> John knows that we are feeding two outside kitties in addition to our
> indoor fur-family. He says that he is going to give preference to other
> kitty-families when screening other potential renters :)

Yay! He sounds like a nice guy.

Around here, it seems that when someplace allows pets, every tenant in
the building has a pet (or more than one). My building is like that.
Like yours, it's a small building, 4 units. Everyone has pets. Among
us all, we have 7 cats and two dogs. :)

Ironically, when I was apartment-hunting and saw the ad for this place,
it said "no pets"! I was undeterred, though, as I had learned that "no
pets" usually means no *dogs*. I came to see the place anyway, and when
I asked about cats, they said it would be fine. Turned out that everyone
else in the building already had pets, so why did they even bother to
put that in the ad? Maybe it was a mistake.

The apartment complex I lived in before I moved here allowed cats, too.
The apartment manager was a cat lover herself, and had two. She even
took care of our cat when we went out of town. The courtyard usually
had a few kitties wandering around - it was a great place for them, full
of grass, trees, and various creepy crawlies to chase around.

A friend of mine owns a building and rents out one of the apartments.
She won't even rent to someone who doesn't have a pet, since it's so
hard for people who do have them to find a place, so she wants to give
them priority.

Joyce
HRFLTiger - 17 Apr 2006 09:02 GMT
> Ironically, when I was apartment-hunting and saw the ad for this place,
> it said "no pets"! I was undeterred, though, as I had learned that "no
> pets" usually means no *dogs*. I came to see the place anyway, and when
> I asked about cats, they said it would be fine///

My appartment in Edinburgh was like that - the landlord said no
pets.... I persuaded him that a dog was OK, then I persuaded him that 2
cats were OK. He even used to come and feed them for me while I was
away! Mind, I supplied pet & vet references and kept the place
spotless. I think it also helped that I allowed him access when ever he
wanted.

Helen M
Cheryl Perkins - 17 Apr 2006 12:44 GMT
> My appartment in Edinburgh was like that - the landlord said no
> pets.... I persuaded him that a dog was OK, then I persuaded him that 2
> cats were OK. He even used to come and feed them for me while I was
> away! Mind, I supplied pet & vet references and kept the place
> spotless. I think it also helped that I allowed him access when ever he
> wanted.

I rented twice from a woman who was the best landlady I ever had - but I
knew she didn't think animals belonged indoors, and the first lease I
signed said 'no pets'. When I moved back into town, I wasn't quite
satisfied with the only place I could find at short notice, and
eventually, when the place I eventually bought was coming vacant, she
offered it to me to rent. I told her up front that since I last rented
from her, I had gotten two cats - was that going to be a problem? She said
no, and added 'tenant may have two (2) cats' in the lease.

Next time she was looking for tenants for the gorgeous apartment I'd
rented first, she got someone with a lab, so she must have been converted
from her 'no pets' stance!

Signature

Cheryl

EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) - 17 Apr 2006 20:24 GMT
>>My appartment in Edinburgh was like that - the landlord said no
>>pets.... I persuaded him that a dog was OK, then I persuaded him that 2
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> rented first, she got someone with a lab, so she must have been converted
> from her 'no pets' stance!

I think a lot of landords who specify "no pets" do so
because they've had bad experiences.  True, the fault lies
with the TENANT, not the pet, but how can they be sure if
they don't know you?  In the past, I've found that sometimes
meeting the owner in person (assuming the property is not in
the hands of a management firm) will persuade them to allow
me to have my cats.

Signature

NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth

Monique Y. Mudama - 17 Apr 2006 20:54 GMT
> I think a lot of landords who specify "no pets" do so because
> they've had bad experiences.  True, the fault lies with the TENANT,
> not the pet, but how can they be sure if they don't know you?  In
> the past, I've found that sometimes meeting the owner in person
> (assuming the property is not in the hands of a management firm)
> will persuade them to allow me to have my cats.

Plus they'd probably get in legal trouble if they specified
"No children" or "No losers."

Signature

monique, who spoils Oscar unmercifully

pictures: http://www.bounceswoosh.org/rpca

EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) - 18 Apr 2006 01:20 GMT
>>I think a lot of landords who specify "no pets" do so because
>>they've had bad experiences.  True, the fault lies with the TENANT,
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Plus they'd probably get in legal trouble if they specified
> "No children" or "No losers."

Well, many ads here DO specify "no section 8".  (I'm not
sure what that means in the case of rental ads, but I think
a "Section 8" discharge from the military is for
psychological problems.)  They CAN advertise a building as
being for "seniors only" (over 55), but I'm not sure what
they could do if the person applying had custody of a couple
of grandchildren who lived with him/her.

Signature

NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth

Matthew AKA NMR - 18 Apr 2006 01:45 GMT
Section 8  is  a funding for people with financial needs or criteria  and or
that are on welfare or other government aiding

(hate how this sounds and looks please forgive )

basically poor people housing  or people in need

>>>I think a lot of landords who specify "no pets" do so because
>>>they've had bad experiences.  True, the fault lies with the TENANT,
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> could do if the person applying had custody of a couple of grandchildren
> who lived with him/her.
Jo Firey - 18 Apr 2006 06:25 GMT
> Section 8  is  a funding for people with financial needs or criteria  and
> or that are on welfare or other government aiding
>
> (hate how this sounds and looks please forgive )
>
> basically poor people housing  or people in need

Really it means three things to the landlord.  They will be paid by the
government so collecting rent won't be a problem.  The premises will have to
pass an inspection as to condition.  And they will be reimbursed up to a
point for damages.

Jo
Matthew AKA NMR - 18 Apr 2006 06:37 GMT
>> Section 8  is  a funding for people with financial needs or criteria  and
>> or that are on welfare or other government aiding
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Jo
In a perfect world    some of these programs are the biggest pain in the a@@

I used to accept food stamps and WIC ( is a federally funded nutrition
program that  provides at no cost: healthy foods for mothers)

To get my money it was more headaches and paperwork  that I stopped doing
it.  Sometimes it could be months before money came in.
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 18 Apr 2006 10:02 GMT
> I used to accept food stamps and WIC ( is a federally funded nutrition
> program that  provides at no cost: healthy foods for mothers)

> To get my money it was more headaches and paperwork  that I stopped doing
> it.  Sometimes it could be months before money came in.

Gee, one would almost think they made it impossible on purpose so you
WOULD give up... nahh...

Joyce
EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) - 19 Apr 2006 03:56 GMT
> In a perfect world    some of these programs are the biggest pain in the a@@
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> To get my money it was more headaches and paperwork  that I stopped doing
> it.  Sometimes it could be months before money came in.

Really?  One of our clients gets rent payments from the
county (I didn't know that was what "Section 8" was).  It
comes in promptly every month for all the apartments
involved.  (Of course, I don't know how long it takes to get
the payments coming - we just do his accounting, his
management firm collects the rents and does any paperwork of
that sort.)

Signature

NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth

EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) - 19 Apr 2006 03:50 GMT
>>Section 8  is  a funding for people with financial needs or criteria  and
>>or that are on welfare or other government aiding
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> pass an inspection as to condition.  And they will be reimbursed up to a
> point for damages.

Sounds great!  Why would landlords NOT want them as tenants?
 (Or are they afraid their buildings wouldn't pass inspection?)

Signature

NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth

jmcquown - 19 Apr 2006 10:55 GMT
>>> Section 8  is  a funding for people with financial needs or
>>> criteria  and or that are on welfare or other government aiding
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Sounds great!  Why would landlords NOT want them as tenants?
>   (Or are they afraid their buildings wouldn't pass inspection?)

Two words:  Unreimbursed damages.

Jill
Dan M - 18 Apr 2006 01:49 GMT
> Well, many ads here DO specify "no section 8".  (I'm not
> sure what that means in the case of rental ads, but I think
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> they could do if the person applying had custody of a couple
> of grandchildren who lived with him/her.

Section 8 is a low-income rental assistance program.  Basically they're
saying "we don't accept county aid vouchers in payment of rent".
EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) - 19 Apr 2006 03:44 GMT
>>Well, many ads here DO specify "no section 8".  (I'm not
>>sure what that means in the case of rental ads, but I think
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Section 8 is a low-income rental assistance program.  Basically they're
> saying "we don't accept county aid vouchers in payment of rent".

Oh.  Thanks - but why would they not do that?  Seems to me
the county would be a lot more secure source than an
individual!  (At least they could be sure the checks
wouldn't bounce!)

Signature

NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth

Dan M - 19 Apr 2006 04:59 GMT
> Oh.  Thanks - but why would they not do that?  Seems to me
> the county would be a lot more secure source than an
> individual!  (At least they could be sure the checks
> wouldn't bounce!)

I asked my landlord about that. He said Section 8 renters were more likely
to move out with no notice, more likely to damage the premises (and the
coverage offered by the government agencies is minimal and slow in
coming), and a lot more likely to be problem tenants. At least, that has
been his experience.

Dan
jmcquown - 19 Apr 2006 10:49 GMT
>> Oh.  Thanks - but why would they not do that?  Seems to me
>> the county would be a lot more secure source than an
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Dan

I haven't been inside an "assisted housing" apartment in 24 years.  In some
places they are special apartment complexes only for Section 8 qualified
residents.  My ex-husband's aunt lived in one with her 3 teenage daughters.
We had to pay a visit a couple of times, notably for holidays.

The floors were cement slab.  When I asked (quietly) why, I was told the
landlord took out all the carpeting because people would either rip it up or
put huge burns in it.  He got tired of replacing it when someone moved out.
He figured if they wanted rugs on their floors they could buy some cheap
rugs at a discount store and then if they wanted to rip them up they could
feel free.

There were also no doors on the kitchen cabinets for the same reason; people
would just tear them off the hinges or take them down to steal the hardware
from the cabinet doors.  There were also a lot of junk cars in the parking
lot; obviously not cars that ran.

I pay a rather hefty price for my apartment and trust me, it's not been easy
since I'm unemployed.  I wouldn't want people like that (I don't mean my
ex-aunt-in-law, necessarily) for my neighbors.

Jill
EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) - 19 Apr 2006 16:36 GMT
>>Oh.  Thanks - but why would they not do that?  Seems to me
>>the county would be a lot more secure source than an
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> coming), and a lot more likely to be problem tenants. At least, that has
> been his experience.

Apparently a lot of others feel the same way, judging by the
number of rental ads in the Penny Saver that say "no section
8 or pets".  I know a couple of "Section 8" tenants (both
are Viet Nam vets with psychological problems - the reason
why I was confused about what it meant).  Neither seems the
sort to be a "problem" tenant, but I don't know them that well.

Signature

NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth

Jo Firey - 19 Apr 2006 17:29 GMT
>>>Oh.  Thanks - but why would they not do that?  Seems to me the county
>>>would be a lot more secure source than an individual!  (At least they
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> problems - the reason why I was confused about what it meant).  Neither
> seems the sort to be a "problem" tenant, but I don't know them that well.

The ideal Sec 8 tenant is an older person on disability.  They stay put,
don't tear the place up and have a small guaranteed income.

How willing landlords will be depends on what other options they have.  The
economy around here is so bad and the low income housing so scarce that sec
8 looks good to them.

Jo
jmcquown - 20 Apr 2006 09:12 GMT
>>>> Oh.  Thanks - but why would they not do that?  Seems to me the
>>>> county would be a lot more secure source than an individual!  (At
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> Jo

When I first moved into this apartment almost 10 years ago, my neighbor
(this is like a duplex apartment setup, only one adjoined neighbor) was an
older lady in a wheelchair.  Oh, she could walk but she didn't when she
didn't have to, which was fine with me.  She had a big old dog and when my
dog Sampson died I gave her some of his toys and treats.

Anyway, you'd never have expected her to high tail it out of there without
paying her rent.  She did just that.  Can't judge a book by its cover.  She
left without a word one day while I was at work.  The apartment manager
called me a few days later and asked if I'd seen her.  Nope.  She sent the
handymen over to look around.  Everything was gone except she'd left the
apartment in a total wreck but still had some things in the storage shed off
the patio.

Her son had the nerve to call up and ask if he could come get her stuff from
the storage room.  The landlady said, "Excuse me?!  She left without any
notice!  She still owes us a month's rent and her security deposit be used
to to clean up the place!"  The apartment manager had the locks changed and
wouldn't let them have access to the apartment or the storage room.

She shook her head and said to me, "Jill, we made every accommodation for
that woman.  She lived here 6 years.  We had a ramp installed for her
wheelchair; we had bars installed in her bathtub.  When we had cookouts by
the pool [Note: they do that all the time, hotdogs, burgers, veggie burgers
and bring your own tater salad, cole slaw, whatever] and she couldn't or
wouldn't come, so someone always took her a plate.  Then she just up and
left without a word.  Sounds like some of John's tenants, although he wasn't
providing food and they didn't stay so long.

Jill
W. Leong - 28 Apr 2006 16:28 GMT
> When I first moved into this apartment almost 10 years ago, my neighbor
> (this is like a duplex apartment setup, only one adjoined neighbor) was an
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> and bring your own tater salad, cole slaw, whatever] and she couldn't or
> wouldn't come, so someone always took her a plate.

Oh I remember the pool side BBQ we used to have in my building.
Since  management changed, we didn't have those anymore.
But we now have our annual Christmas 'Meet and Greet' in the
party room. You don't have to be worried about getting too much
to drink, as all you have to do is to take the elevator to go home.

Winnie

Then she just up and
> left without a word.  Sounds like some of John's tenants, although he
> wasn't
> providing food and they didn't stay so long.
>
> Jill
jmcquown - 18 Apr 2006 05:10 GMT
>>> My appartment in Edinburgh was like that - the landlord said no
>>> pets.... I persuaded him that a dog was OK, then I persuaded him
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> the hands of a management firm) will persuade them to allow
> me to have my cats.

My LLL, John, owns a couple of older homes converted to rental apartments.
He has decided to institute a no-pets rule (with the possible exception of a
cat) due to damages done by pets.  If it was legal he'd institute a no-kids
rule, too.  He and his handyman went to one of the apartments to do a repair
job and one of the kids was roller-blading across the hardwood floors!

Jill
sriddles@aol.com - 18 Apr 2006 06:58 GMT
> >>> My appartment in Edinburgh was like that - the landlord said no
> >>> pets.... I persuaded him that a dog was OK, then I persuaded him
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> Jill

Well, tell him good luck with that. We finally sold one house and gave
the other one to our son. I didn't like being a landlord. I was too
much of a pushover and we didn't make any money at it because of that.
I still have the folder of photos  we took to small claims court. I
look at it every once in a while just in case I ever get the notion
that rental property is a good idea.
The only good thing about it was, it was a great write-off on taxes.
BTW, I never, not once, had any problems or damage because of pets. The
pets were great. Some problems with children, but the vast majority of
the damage/destruction was by  *adults*.

Sherry
EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) - 19 Apr 2006 03:47 GMT
>>>>My appartment in Edinburgh was like that - the landlord said no
>>>>pets.... I persuaded him that a dog was OK, then I persuaded him
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> rule, too.  He and his handyman went to one of the apartments to do a repair
> job and one of the kids was roller-blading across the hardwood floors!

You can charge a non-refundable "damage deposit" for people
with pets, can you do it for those with children, too?

> Jill

Signature

NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth

jmcquown - 19 Apr 2006 10:52 GMT
>>>>> My appartment in Edinburgh was like that - the landlord said no
>>>>> pets.... I persuaded him that a dog was OK, then I persuaded him
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> You can charge a non-refundable "damage deposit" for people
> with pets, can you do it for those with children, too?

I don't think you can specifically refer to it as a deposit for that but the
damage can certainly be covered by the security deposit.  I haven't really
quizzed him about the specifics because it's really not my business.  But I
don't think he charges a high enough security deposit considering the cost
of (for example) sanding and revarnishing hardwood floors.

Jill
Adrian A - 17 Apr 2006 10:36 GMT
> When Nancy and I were looking for a rental property 4 years ago (it's
> hard to believe we've been here this long) we had an awful time
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> indoor fur-family. He says that he is going to give preference to
> other kitty-families when screening other potential renters :)

That's great news! Maybe you'll be able to introduce the new renters to
rpca. :-)
Signature

Adrian (Owned by Snoopy and Bagheera)
Cats leave pawprints on your heart.
http://community.webshots.com/user/clowderuk

SuzQ - 17 Apr 2006 12:57 GMT
DanM said:
John knows that we are feeding two outside kitties in addition to our
indoor fur-family. He says that he is going to give preference to other
kitty-families when screening other potential renters :)
====================================
That's great Purrs that he finds great catloving tenents,
Suz&Spicey
sriddles@aol.com - 17 Apr 2006 15:10 GMT
> When Nancy and I were looking for a rental property 4 years ago (it's hard
> to believe we've been here this long) we had an awful time finding a place
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> indoor fur-family. He says that he is going to give preference to other
> kitty-families when screening other potential renters :)

Your landlord know what he/she is doing. People over 30 with pets and
no children are the best tenants ever.
I don't mean to offend anybody with that, but it is the honest truth
from our experience. It doesn't take too many bad apples to really
color your judgment about people.
What's really cool is that he is giving preference to other cat-owning
families! That means they'll love the outdoor kitties too!
Sherry
Enfilade - 17 Apr 2006 16:36 GMT
Our lease says "no pets" but when the building superintendants have
cats and there are dogs walked through the halls and in the elevator,
you know they don't care about pets.

Though when we rented the place, they said "two cats are fine".  A
month later, moving in, we had four (we did not plan on finding those
bitties....)

The super found me taking five empty jugs of kittylitter to the recycle
room and she could not believe that we have four cats, on account of
"I clean the hall outside your door and you know I could never tell!"
Well of course not...we keep them clean.  The only place that smells
liek the litter box, IS the litter box.  There's someone on the seventh
floor with only one cat and she never cleans the litter box...the whole
HALL smells like a litter box, and the woman ignores written notices to
clean.

--Fil
sriddles@aol.com - 17 Apr 2006 17:07 GMT
> Our lease says "no pets" but when the building superintendants have
> cats and there are dogs walked through the halls and in the elevator,
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> The super found me taking five empty jugs of kittylitter to the recycle
> room and she could not believe that we have four cats,
snipped

People always say that to me, with five cats. I work at it though! I
try to be extra diligent about the litterboxes.

Sherry
Christine K. - 17 Apr 2006 17:12 GMT
<snip>
>> The super found me taking five empty jugs of kittylitter to the recycle
>> room and she could not believe that we have four cats,
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Sherry

I find it strange that someone would *not* clean the litterbox. I mean
it isn't like they can clean it themselves, and I sure wouldn't want to
use a stinking loo to do my business, so I expect the same to be true
for the kitties. Laku has even once "commented" on a not-clean-enough
litterbox by pooping on the floor next to the box. That time we *had*
left it unattended for too long tho, so Laku was right.

Signature

Christine in Vantaa, Finland
christal63 (at) gmail (dot) com
photos: http://photos.yahoo.com/christal63
photos: http://community.webshots.com/user/chkr63

EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) - 17 Apr 2006 20:35 GMT
> <snip>
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> for the kitties. Laku has even once "commented" on a not-clean-enough
> litterbox by pooping on the floor next to the box.

Mine occasionally miss the box, but the box is clean enough
- I think it's just a matter of poor positioning.  (Their
FEET are in the box, they just let the rear end hang over
too far!)

Signature

NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth

Christine K. - 18 Apr 2006 09:06 GMT
>> <snip>
>>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> it's just a matter of poor positioning.  (Their FEET are in the box,
> they just let the rear end hang over too far!)

Laku cannot have been in the box when he pooped outside, the poop was
about 30cm / 1ft from the litter box. So I can only assume it was a
statement. And the box *was* dirtier than usual then, I should have
cleaned it in the evening, but was too tired and left it to the morning.
We use wood pellet litter that turns into sawdust when wet, the box was
almost completely full of sawdust, no pellets anymore, on that evening.

Signature

Christine in Vantaa, Finland
christal63 (at) gmail (dot) com
photos: http://photos.yahoo.com/christal63
photos: http://community.webshots.com/user/chkr63

W. Leong - 18 Apr 2006 15:03 GMT
> Laku cannot have been in the box when he pooped outside, the poop was
> about 30cm / 1ft from the litter box. So I can only assume it was a
> statement. And the box *was* dirtier than usual then, I should have
> cleaned it in the evening, but was too tired and left it to the morning.
> We use wood pellet litter that turns into sawdust when wet, the box was
> almost completely full of sawdust, no pellets anymore, on that evening.

I've been well trained by Rusty. Now no matter how tired I am, I always
do my litter box duty every night. I found it easier if I do it right after
I wash my dinner dishes. Then I take out the garbage along with the
litter box offerings. All the 'dirty' work is done then, I can wash my
face, take a shower, and relax for the evening, knowing I won't get a
'present' on the floor from Rusty in the morning. Or that 'present'
on the floor would indicate he is not feeling well and require a trip to
TED.
If I know I am going to be out in the evening, my litter box duty will
be done in the morning after breakfast.

Winnie
Cheryl Perkins - 18 Apr 2006 17:57 GMT
> Mine occasionally miss the box, but the box is clean enough
> - I think it's just a matter of poor positioning.  (Their
> FEET are in the box, they just let the rear end hang over
> too far!)

A friend of mine had to get a larger box - their Harry tried to do
the right thing, but every so often he wouldn't manage to get the
essential bit of his body over the previous box. Paws, no problem, all
four would be in the box.

Signature

Cheryl

Magic Mood Jeep© - 18 Apr 2006 19:10 GMT
>> Mine occasionally miss the box, but the box is clean enough
>> - I think it's just a matter of poor positioning.  (Their
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> essential bit of his body over the previous box. Paws, no problem, all
> four would be in the box.

Lizzie is funny when she's in the box - she will only 'go' with her head
sticking out the door (we use 'hooded' boxes), and most time her front paws
will be on the edge of the door - and a lot of times one pack paw as well
(when we see her do this, one of us will call out "Lizzie Three-Paws"), and
I've seen her will all *four* paws on that edge (that rates a "Lizzie
Four-Paws") - quite a trick to be able to concentrate on balancing *and*
'going' at the same time, I think! :D
Monique Y. Mudama - 18 Apr 2006 19:41 GMT
> Lizzie is funny when she's in the box - she will only 'go' with her
> head sticking out the door (we use 'hooded' boxes), and most time
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> able to concentrate on balancing *and* 'going' at the same time, I
> think! :D

Maybe she does this so she can't be taken by surprise while she's
otherwise occupied?

Signature

monique, who spoils Oscar unmercifully

pictures: http://www.bounceswoosh.org/rpca

W. Leong - 18 Apr 2006 21:32 GMT
> Lizzie is funny when she's in the box - she will only 'go' with her head
> sticking out the door (we use 'hooded' boxes), and most time her front
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> rates a "Lizzie Four-Paws") - quite a trick to be able to concentrate on
> balancing *and* 'going' at the same time, I think! :D

Rusty sometimes stuck his head out of the hooded box too.  I think he
probably
tried to tell me that the box stinked. Since I have been very diligent in my
litter
box duty, I haven't seen him done that.

Winnie
Joy - 18 Apr 2006 22:21 GMT
> >> Mine occasionally miss the box, but the box is clean enough
> >> - I think it's just a matter of poor positioning.  (Their
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> Four-Paws") - quite a trick to be able to concentrate on balancing *and*
> 'going' at the same time, I think! :D

Maybe she's a bit claustrophobic.  ;-)

Joy
Karen AKA Kajikit - 18 Apr 2006 22:05 GMT
>> Mine occasionally miss the box, but the box is clean enough
>> - I think it's just a matter of poor positioning.  (Their
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>essential bit of his body over the previous box. Paws, no problem, all
>four would be in the box.

We got a huge box for the girls because Scouty had that problem with a
small one... all four paws were in place and she was very puzzled when
she turned around to bury and found there wasn't anything there! So I
got them an under-the-bed box instead of two small boxes side by side.
It's not really much larger than the two boxes put together, but she
can stand in the middle.
EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) - 17 Apr 2006 20:31 GMT
> The super found me taking five empty jugs of kittylitter to the recycle
> room and she could not believe that we have four cats, on account of
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> HALL smells like a litter box, and the woman ignores written notices to
> clean.

I was a bit worried about adopting Cendrillon from across
the hall, when I found she had made a couple of "deposits"
on the carpet, there.  However, the litter box left for her
by the guy who abandoned her reeked so badly of ammonia, I
couldn't really blame her for not using it.  Only once, when
she first came, did she forget herself and use the carpet.
I promptly picked it up and deposited it in the litterbox,
then showed it to her.  SFAIK, she's used the litterbox ever
since.  ("SFAIK" because I can't see the area under the bed,
where she spent a lot of time when she first arrived, but
I've never smelled anything suspicious in the bedroom.)

Signature

NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth

glsummer@neptunelink.com - 17 Apr 2006 19:08 GMT
>When Nancy and I were looking for a rental property 4 years ago (it's hard
>to believe we've been here this long) we had an awful time finding a place
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>indoor fur-family. He says that he is going to give preference to other
>kitty-families when screening other potential renters :)

That is great, Dan :-)

My new landlord isn't preferential, but he is the same as the old
landlord in that it doesn't bother him we have 9 cats in here.  Thank
heavens for landlords who don't mind pets.

Ginger-lyn

Home Pages:
 http://www.moonsummer.com
 http://www.angelfire.com/folk/glsummer (homepage & cats)
 http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~summer/index.htm (genealogy)
 http://www.movieanimals.bravehost.com/ (The Violence Against
                        Animals in Movies Website)
EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) - 17 Apr 2006 20:05 GMT
I seem to remember you live in Southern California, and I'm
going to have to move soon.  If you're anywhere near the San
Fernando Valley, could you e-mail me privately with the
owner's name and phone number?  (I only have two cats, and
don't plan on more, but still....)

> When Nancy and I were looking for a rental property 4 years ago (it's hard
> to believe we've been here this long) we had an awful time finding a place
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> indoor fur-family. He says that he is going to give preference to other
> kitty-families when screening other potential renters :)

Signature

NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth

Dan M - 18 Apr 2006 01:13 GMT
> I seem to remember you live in Southern California, and I'm
> going to have to move soon.  If you're anywhere near the San
> Fernando Valley, could you e-mail me privately with the
> owner's name and phone number?  (I only have two cats, and
> don't plan on more, but still....)

I don't know if we're close enough to be of any help to you (we're on the
east side of San Bernardino), but I e-mailed you the info.

Dan
W. Leong - 17 Apr 2006 22:28 GMT
> When Nancy and I were looking for a rental property 4 years ago (it's hard
> to believe we've been here this long) we had an awful time finding a place
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> indoor fur-family. He says that he is going to give preference to other
> kitty-families when screening other potential renters :)

The old apt. complex I lived in didn't allow pets. But the superintendent
has a Rotweiler (or was it a Doberman), maybe to scare away tenants
who knocked on his door. I was scared by the dog's barking.
When I was at the vet, I met a woman who lives in my  old apt. complex.
She said they allowed pets now. So rules are made to be broken or changed.

Winnie
dnr - 17 Apr 2006 23:26 GMT
> "Dan M" <dan@wolf.com> wrote in message
>> When Nancy and I were looking for a rental property 4 years ago (it's
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>> indoor fur-family. He says that he is going to give preference to other
>> kitty-families when screening other potential renters :)

> The old apt. complex I lived in didn't allow pets. But the superintendent
> has a Rotweiler (or was it a Doberman), maybe to scare away tenants
> who knocked on his door. I was scared by the dog's barking.
> When I was at the vet, I met a woman who lives in my  old apt. complex.
> She said they allowed pets now. So rules are made to be broken or changed.
> Winnie

I have good news for pet people in several cities (too bad not all: sorry,
southern CA dwellers) - there is a company called Round Hill Pacific,
based in S.Francisco, CA, that buys up really old historic buildings,
renovates/repairs them, and turns them into apt. rentals. They LOVE
pets of all kinds. Catch is a one-time-only deposit (not godawful if you
work) - on each pet - not refundable, but if pet you paid it on dies,
you can get another one w/o another deposit. There is a terrible habit
among landlords out west here of charging "pet rent" - usually $10 to
$30 a month - on TOP of your usual apt. rent (I never saw this in FL
but that might have just been area I lived in); Round Hill Pacific does
NOT do this! Once you pay deposit, pet deposit, and first month's
rent, all you pay is apt. rent plus very small $3 to $15 more for bldg.
electric (hall, outside) lighting and water (water ain't cheap out here,
but total bill divided up into all apt.tenants, since there are no water
meters to each apt.). This family-owned corp. has rental
bldgs. in Portland, Salt Lake City, Pittsburgh, Denver,
and San Francisco. They have a website, where you can
see apts. for rent and/or communicate with them.
www.RHP.rentals.com

I used to live in one of their apt. bldgs. Even though outside of
bldg. was like from 1920's (this bldg. was an old hotel then)
fixtures and especially plumbing has been replaced w/modern
day stuff; ditto electric wiring throughout. When something
broke or leaked, their repair crews were there *the next day*
to take care of business. I highly recommend this landlord;
in this area, a large red striper cat (former stray) lounges at
his leisure on the reception desk in their rental office......he
goes home w/one or the other employee at day's end. He
is "unadoptable" - rental staff cannot bear to part w/him.
Matthew AKA NMR - 18 Apr 2006 00:32 GMT
>> "Dan M" <dan@wolf.com> wrote in message
>>> When Nancy and I were looking for a rental property 4 years ago (it's
[quoted text clipped - 50 lines]
> goes home w/one or the other employee at day's end. He
> is "unadoptable" - rental staff cannot bear to part w/him.

Most landlords in Florida either charge a pet deposit or  take double
security down  or charge a non refundable fee
Hotels charge a pet deposit $50 - 75 During the hurricanes   the hotel we
moved all our shelter animals into  waived this fee as long as We signed a
agreement to either clean the problems ourselves or pay for it.
Jane - 18 Apr 2006 15:38 GMT
>Most landlords in Florida either charge a pet deposit or  take double
>security down  or charge a non refundable fee
>Hotels charge a pet deposit $50 - 75 During the hurricanes   the hotel we
>moved all our shelter animals into  waived this fee as long as We signed a
>agreement to either clean the problems ourselves or pay for it.

My current apartment complex accepts pets.  Fin had his own security
deposit, which was 3 times mine (only half of it was non-refundable),
his own rent, AND his own lease.  It said that all cats had to be
declawed, but I made them take that out.  They needed a picture and
a vet's checkup note saying he was healthy.  I still haven't gotten
a picture of Rita over to them. Oh well.
Believe me, after my last miserable apartment fiasco, I spent over an
hour reading this lease over carefully, word by word.

Jane
- owned and operated by Princess Rita
Karen - 18 Apr 2006 16:12 GMT
> My current apartment complex accepts pets.  Fin had his own security
> deposit, which was 3 times mine (only half of it was non-refundable),
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Jane
> - owned and operated by Princess Rita

Why on earth would they want a vet checkup to say the cat is
healthy?????????? **BOGGLE**
dnr - 21 Apr 2006 07:39 GMT
>> My current apartment complex accepts pets.  Fin had his own security
>> deposit, which was 3 times mine (only half of it was non-refundable),
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Why on earth would they want a vet checkup to say the cat is
> healthy?????????? **BOGGLE**

Can't say for your locale, but I am very familiar (several
residences way far from each other) with
city/county/province codes, ordinances,
and licensing requirements.
Some places you can get away with ignoring them;
many condo HOA's and rental complexes mandate
compliance with, *in writing* for their records.
And we are talking registering pets and wearable tags.
W. Leong - 28 Apr 2006 16:30 GMT
> Can't say for your locale, but I am very familiar (several
> residences way far from each other) with
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> compliance with, *in writing* for their records.
> And we are talking registering pets and wearable tags.

At one time, the condo board wanted to pass a new bylaw
to restrict the size of pets allowed. They also wanted to have
proof of vaccinations. But we never got enough owners to
attend the annual meeting to cast a vote.

Winnie
EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) - 18 Apr 2006 01:26 GMT
>There is a terrible habit
> among landlords out west here of charging "pet rent" - usually $10 to
> $30 a month - on TOP of your usual apt. rent (I never saw this in FL
> but that might have just been area I lived in);

I've never encountered it in the Los Angeles area, either,
until just recently.  Fortunately, there are enough "pet
friendly" buildings here, along with those that simply
charge a pet deposit, so I could simply tell that
prospective landord to "Take a hike!"

Signature

NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth

Monique Y. Mudama - 18 Apr 2006 03:20 GMT
> I've never encountered it in the Los Angeles area, either, until
> just recently.  Fortunately, there are enough "pet friendly"
> buildings here, along with those that simply charge a pet deposit,
> so I could simply tell that prospective landord to "Take a hike!"

For some reason I read this as "pot friendly"!

Signature

monique, who spoils Oscar unmercifully

pictures: http://www.bounceswoosh.org/rpca

jmcquown - 19 Apr 2006 11:00 GMT
>> There is a terrible habit
>> among landlords out west here of charging "pet rent" - usually $10 to
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> charge a pet deposit, so I could simply tell that
> prospective landord to "Take a hike!"

Some apartments in the Memphis, TN area charge extra pet rent, others don't.
They *all* charge a pet deposit if they accept pets; some of the pet
deposits are outrageous ($500/month per pet).  My apartment complex only
charged $125 but tacked on an extra $10/month in "pet rent".  After a few
years it went up to $15/month.  When I lost my job the apartment manager
waived the monthly pet rent for me.  Every little bit helps.

Jill
EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) - 19 Apr 2006 16:42 GMT
>>>There is a terrible habit
>>>among landlords out west here of charging "pet rent" - usually $10 to
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> years it went up to $15/month.  When I lost my job the apartment manager
> waived the monthly pet rent for me.  Every little bit helps.

I agree $500 is outrageous, but if it's a monthly charge,
it's not a "deposit"!  A deposit is a one-time payment to
indemnify the owner against loss, and why would anyone PAY
that much more than once?  (Unless your "pet" is a
full-grown lion or something that you'd have truble housing
anywhere?)

> Jill

Signature

NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth

jmcquown - 20 Apr 2006 18:02 GMT
>>>> There is a terrible habit
>>>> among landlords out west here of charging "pet rent" - usually $10
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> I agree $500 is outrageous, but if it's a monthly charge

EEEEP!  I meant $500 per pet, not per month!  And even per pet it's
outrageous.  Then the monthly pet rent of $10, 15, some places 20 or 25
dollars extra per month.  (You see I was typing at 5AM.  I haven't had any
sleep for a few days due to problems with pain in my right shoulder and
arm.)

Jill
EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) - 21 Apr 2006 03:33 GMT
> EEEEP!  I meant $500 per pet, not per month!  And even per pet it's
> outrageous.  Then the monthly pet rent of $10, 15, some places 20 or 25
> dollars extra per month.  (You see I was typing at 5AM.  I haven't had any
> sleep for a few days due to problems with pain in my right shoulder and
> arm.)

I have a simlar problem - I find it bothers me a lot less
when I don't use the computer so much, but who wants to do that?

Signature

NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth

Yowie - 18 Apr 2006 13:09 GMT
> When Nancy and I were looking for a rental property 4 years ago (it's hard
> to believe we've been here this long) we had an awful time finding a place
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> indoor fur-family. He says that he is going to give preference to other
> kitty-families when screening other potential renters :)

Here in Australia, or at least, NSW in Australia, the standard lease is "no
pets". Most real estate agents couldn't be bothered changing from the
standard lease, so its *oficially* "no pets" even if you have a verbal
agreement to be allowed to have them. Most landlords aren't that
unreasonable, but then again most landlords here go through real estate
agents, and therefore they are hard to contact and talk to person to person
when you only get their name and have no other way of contacting them
*except* the agent. Each and every place I've rented, Shmogg has been a
"what cat?". Indeed, I had two "what budgies?" and a bowl of "what fish?" at
one time, too. No-one seemed to complain.... mostly because I paid the rent
on time.

Yowie
Singh - 21 Apr 2006 17:11 GMT
I'm not surprised your landlord would give preference to cat-families. Here in
Buffalo, it's routine.

Buffalo and the inner-ring suburbs have a rat problem of majestic proportion.
While the city recently implemented a closed-trash can ordinance, the vermin
still spawn, and the vast majority of landlords want the cats. Many apartments
are over businesses. I lived in one place over a nail shop, and the health
codes are strict; if the guy--the owner and a nail artist himself--had been
found with a rat in his place, it would have been lights out for him. Around
here, most of the ads that say "no pets"  really mean no dogs, and even then I
think it's just a ruse to screen applicants. No landlord in a bad neighborhood
turns down the guy with an obedience-trained Rottweiler.

Blessed be,
Baha

> When Nancy and I were looking for a rental property 4 years ago (it's hard
> to believe we've been here this long) we had an awful time finding a place
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> indoor fur-family. He says that he is going to give preference to other
> kitty-families when screening other potential renters :)
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.