>>> Sometimes being *way* behind in reading has benefits. In the NYT
>>> Book Review 10/26/97 :-) there was a nice review of a cat photo
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>>
>> Joyce
Yeah, but he's not claiming them as his, and lets everyone know that he's
just scanning them. At first I liked the series, but then I realized that
all the cats (and dogs) in these pictures were in a place where none of them
were ever speutered, and were probably never taken to a vet (if there is
even a vet on this Greek island where the pics were taken), and some did not
look to be in the best of health. I started feeling sorry for them, whished
I could go over there, round them all up and get them vetted and speutered,
but I can't do that (monetarily speaking) and so I stopped looking at the
pics.

Signature
The ONE and ONLY
lefthanded-pathetic-paranoid-psychotic-sarcastic-wiseass-ditzy former-blonde
in Bloomington! (And proud of it, too)?
email me at nalee1964 (at) insightbb (dot) com
http://community.webshots.com/user/mgcmdjeep
>> Somebody has been scanning from those books and posting on
>> alt.binaries.pictures.animals. I believe there's also a dog series.
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>>>
>>> Joyce
CatNipped - 05 Oct 2004 16:33 GMT
> Yeah, but he's not claiming them as his, and lets everyone know that he's
> just scanning them.
Even giving credit is not enough without the author's express permission.
He (she) is devaluing these photos by giving away for free what the author
is trying to sell. Let's hope the author (and his lawyers) don't catch this
guy or he's in *big* trouble with copyright infringement.
Hugs,
CatNipped