I have to question the whole thing. The chips aren't really connected
to anything. The only way they are accessed is with the chip reader,
so is it the chip or the reader that is virus prone? Matter of fact,
is it the chip, the reader, or just the Database itself? I'd have to
see where the vulnerability exists before I really worried about it. I
mean, for ages I heard a load of hype about y2k and so forth, but I
owned several computers that were never updated and I lost nothing.
Not a single bit of info missing.
I love technology, don't get me wrong. Still, I know there are plenty
of people out there who will charge 100% more for something just
because it's "certified" in some fashion or other. What better market
to target than the pet industry? People love their pets, and they'll
spend money to ensure they have the best for them. Unfortunately,
there are plenty of people who are well aware of this, and they're more
than willing to capitalise on it.
Cheers,
Azy!
"There are other risks to feline teeth-brushing that one must
consider. Firstly, there are claws with which to contend: 18 of them to
be precise." ~~ Mr. Fleez
www.housecatwisdom.blogspot.com
treeline12345@yahoo.com - 16 Mar 2006 00:07 GMT
> I have to question the whole thing. The chips aren't really connected
> to anything. The only way they are accessed is with the chip reader,
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> owned several computers that were never updated and I lost nothing.
> Not a single bit of info missing.
It's a theoretical scientific article so hard to answer your questions
from the newspaper article which was a bit general and for the lay
public.
Again, this is not an article about what happened, it's a computer
science article what is theoretically able to occur. The actual article
may give steps and ways to prevent this.
The points you raise I don't know because I have not read the
scientific article but it would be interesting if the corruption would
go back to the database or the chip itself. If the chip is an EPROM of
some type, one wonders how difficult it would be to corrupt the chip if
it is scanned only in Read-Only Mode. I wonder to corrupt the chip one
would have to corrupt also the scanner and have to do a Write. And in
the past writes take quite a bit of time, but who knows now.
This is maybe along the lines of virii getting into cell phones.
Originally that was thought to be impossible. But people are quite good
at destructive things and can put a virus or some sort of disruption
into almost anything, even document files which were also thought to be
immune before Word Macros.
I remember getting an email from McGraw-Hill which contained an MS Word
document that had a very literary named virus attached! How
appropriate. Fortunately, the virus was relatively harmless and just
messed up the summary documentation of the basic document.
Monique Y. Mudama - 16 Mar 2006 00:27 GMT
> The points you raise I don't know because I have not read the
> scientific article but it would be interesting if the corruption
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> to do a Write. And in the past writes take quite a bit of time, but
> who knows now.
I can imagine that one could overwrite a chip's data with some other
data.
It's hard to imagine it being able to do much more than that. As far
as I know it has no ability to actively send a signal.

Signature
monique, who spoils Oscar unmercifully
pictures: http://www.bounceswoosh.org/rpca