Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / Cat Anecdotes / March 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Is Your Cat Infected With a Computer Virus?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
treeline12345@yahoo.com - 15 Mar 2006 19:47 GMT
Study Says Chips in ID Tags Are Vulnerable to Viruses
By JOHN MARKOFF
Published: March 15, 2006
some excerpts from the New York Times at nytimes.com

In the researchers' paper, "Is Your Cat Infected With a Computer
Virus?," the group, affiliated with the computer science department at
Vrije Universiteit in Amsterdam, also describes how the vulnerability
could be used to undermine a variety of tracking systems.

The researchers said they realized that there are risks associated with
publishing security vulnerabilities in computerized systems. To head
off some of the possible attacks they described, they have also
published a set of steps to help protect RFID chips from such attacks.

The group, led by Andrew S. Tanenbaum, an American computer scientist,
will make the presentation at the annual Pervasive Computing and
Communications Conference sponsored by the Institute of Electrical and
Electronic Engineers. Mr. Tanenbaum is the author of the Minix
operating system, an experimental project that became the heart of the
Linux open-source operating system.

amazing. glad i held off until i can get a certified virus free chip :)
Azy - 15 Mar 2006 21:15 GMT
I have to question the whole thing.  The chips aren't really connected
to anything.  The only way they are accessed is with the chip reader,
so is it the chip or the reader that is virus prone?  Matter of fact,
is it the chip, the reader, or just the Database itself?  I'd have to
see where the vulnerability exists before I really worried about it.  I
mean, for ages I heard a load of hype about y2k and so forth, but I
owned several computers that were never updated and I lost nothing.
Not a single bit of info missing.

I love technology, don't get me wrong.  Still, I know there are plenty
of people out there who will charge 100% more for something just
because it's "certified" in some fashion or other.  What better market
to target than the pet industry?  People love their pets, and they'll
spend money to ensure they have the best for them.  Unfortunately,
there are plenty of people who are well aware of this, and they're more
than willing to capitalise on it.

Cheers,
Azy!

"There are other risks to feline teeth-brushing that one must
consider. Firstly, there are claws with which to contend: 18 of them to
be precise." ~~ Mr. Fleez

www.housecatwisdom.blogspot.com
treeline12345@yahoo.com - 16 Mar 2006 00:07 GMT
> I have to question the whole thing.  The chips aren't really connected
> to anything.  The only way they are accessed is with the chip reader,
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> owned several computers that were never updated and I lost nothing.
> Not a single bit of info missing.

It's a theoretical scientific article so hard to answer your questions
from the newspaper article which was a bit general and for the lay
public.

Again, this is not an article about what happened, it's a computer
science article what is theoretically able to occur. The actual article
may give steps and ways to prevent this.

The points you raise I don't know because I have not read the
scientific article but it would be interesting if the corruption would
go back to the database or the chip itself. If the chip is an EPROM of
some type, one wonders how difficult it would be to corrupt the chip if
it is scanned only in Read-Only Mode. I wonder to corrupt the chip one
would have to corrupt also the scanner and have to do a Write. And in
the past writes take quite a bit of time, but who knows now.

This is maybe along the lines of virii getting into cell phones.
Originally that was thought to be impossible. But people are quite good
at destructive things and can put a virus or some sort of disruption
into almost anything, even document files which were also thought to be
immune before Word Macros.

I remember getting an email from McGraw-Hill which contained an MS Word
document that had a very literary named virus attached! How
appropriate. Fortunately, the virus was relatively harmless and just
messed up the summary documentation of the basic document.
Monique Y. Mudama - 16 Mar 2006 00:27 GMT
> The points you raise I don't know because I have not read the
> scientific article but it would be interesting if the corruption
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> to do a Write. And in the past writes take quite a bit of time, but
> who knows now.

I can imagine that one could overwrite a chip's data with some other
data.

It's hard to imagine it being able to do much more than that.  As far
as I know it has no ability to actively send a signal.

Signature

monique, who spoils Oscar unmercifully

pictures: http://www.bounceswoosh.org/rpca


Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.