Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / Cat Anecdotes / January 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Advice request

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Victor Martinez - 02 Jan 2006 17:41 GMT
I emailed our pet sitter with the following message:

Our new alarm system keeps track of when it gets turned on and off and
when doors are opened and closed. According to the records, you spent an
average of 10 minutes per visit inside the house, including three visits
of less than 6 minutes. When we first hired you, you said you would
spend an average of 30 minutes per visit, so you could socialize with
the cats. Is that no longer your policy? We don't think that 6 minutes
is enough time to feed the cats and fish and clean all 3 boxes, let
alone play with the cats a little bit.
Do you have anything to say in your favor?

She replied with this:

I am very sorry that you are not satisfied with my service.  This X-mas
was very busy and I was very pressed for time.  I totally understand
your dissatisfaction.   You have been wonderful clients and I have let
you down.  I did feed, clean, and kiss on the  cats, but I totally
understand your disappointment with the time spent.  I can refund 1/2
your payment.  I am a good, honest person who loves pets, and I do not
want clients who are dissatisfied with my service.  I never hold a
person to use me as a Pet Sitter.  I want my clients to be happy and
satisfied with my service.
Let me know if you want me to refund the 1/2 payment and I can drop off
your key if you want it.  It is your choice.

What do you guys think I should do? She has worked for us for over 5
years and we've never had anything to complain about. When we went to
Paris and our hot water pipes broke, she called the city and had the
water service turned off, which saved our house from significant damage.
I've been looking at other pet services in town and they all seem to be
very impersonal.

Signature

Victor M. Martinez
Owned and operated by the Fantastic Seven (TM)
Send your spam here: uce@ftc.gov
Email me here: pistorLITTER@BOXaustin.rr.com

Pat - 02 Jan 2006 18:01 GMT
I'd take the 50% refund and keep her on in future. Now that she knows she
will be timed, she will keep to her promise of 30 minutes minimum.
Debbie Wilson - 02 Jan 2006 18:08 GMT
> I'd take the 50% refund and keep her on in future. Now that she knows she
> will be timed, she will keep to her promise of 30 minutes minimum.

I'd second this. Her answer is very honest and fair, and 5 years' good
record is worth a great deal in my eyes. Could be hard to find someone
else who you can trust in any way... JMHO.

Deb.
Signature

http://www.scientific-art.com

"He looked a fierce and quarrelsome cat, but claw he never would;
He only bit the ones he loved, because they tasted good." S. Greenfield

CatNipped - 02 Jan 2006 18:08 GMT
>I emailed our pet sitter with the following message:
>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> looking at other pet services in town and they all seem to be very
> impersonal.

I believe in second chances, and she at least sounded sincere - but I have
been taken advantage of because I'm such a softie, so that this advice with
a grain of salt.

Signature

Hugs,

CatNipped

See all my masters at:  http://www.PossiblePlaces.com/CatNipped/

Helen Miles - 02 Jan 2006 18:20 GMT
> What do you guys think I should do? She has worked for us for over 5
> years and we've never had anything to complain about. When we went to
> Paris and our hot water pipes broke, she called the city and had the
> water service turned off, which saved our house from significant damage.
> I've been looking at other pet services in town and they all seem to be
> very impersonal.

It seems a very honest answer, and she's not trying to wriggle out of
anything - she's held up her hands and appologised. Personally, I'd give
her a second chance. As Deb says, 5 years is a long time and the cats &
you know her. She'll also be more "aware" that she is being monitored in
future. ;o)

If she hadn't been so honest and responded differently, I'd have told
her to walk.

Helen M  
Adrian - 02 Jan 2006 18:21 GMT
> I emailed our pet sitter with the following message:
>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> damage. I've been looking at other pet services in town and they all
> seem to be very impersonal.

Personally, I'd give her a second chance. She at least did come and feed the
cats, and I assume the litter boxes were reasonable when you returned. I
think she should have left a note explaining she'd been pressed for time,
hopefully she'll be more carefull in future.
Signature

Adrian (Owned by Snoopy and Bagheera)
A House is not a home, without a cat.
http://community.webshots.com/user/clowderuk

mlbriggs - 02 Jan 2006 18:37 GMT
>> I emailed our pet sitter with the following message:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> think she should have left a note explaining she'd been pressed for time,
> hopefully she'll be more carefull in future.

I have a question:  When your water was turned off, how did she provide
fresh water for your pets?

Also there is a difference between "an average  time"  and "a minimum time".
You should have a clear, written understanding of your agreement

Yes, to a second chance with a clear, written understanding of your
agreement.  The fact that you can trust her with your house keys is
important and I would tell her this.  But she should also understand that
your "kids" are more than "just pets".

Best wishes and happy New Year.  MLB
Victor Martinez - 03 Jan 2006 04:34 GMT
> I have a question:  When your water was turned off, how did she provide
> fresh water for your pets?

Good question, I'm not sure. We have a pet fountain that holds enough
water for several days.

Signature

Victor M. Martinez
Owned and operated by the Fantastic Seven (TM)
Send your spam here: uce@ftc.gov
Email me here: pistorLITTER@BOXaustin.rr.com

Monique Y. Mudama - 03 Jan 2006 18:52 GMT
> Also there is a difference between "an average  time"  and "a
> minimum time".  You should have a clear, written understanding of
> your agreement

That's a good point.  I don't know about having a contract, but
averaging half an hour every visit may mean that she'll be there less
than half an hour sometimes.

I liked Victor's letter to her, and her response.  I think a lot of us
tend to overcommit during the holidays (parties, shopping for
presents, visiting people, etc), and it must be even worse for those
whose business increases during that time.  I'd give her another
chance.  Don't know what I'd do about the refund offer.

Signature

monique, who spoils Oscar unmercifully

pictures: http://www.bounceswoosh.org/rpca

Gracecat - 02 Jan 2006 18:53 GMT
> Personally, I'd give her a second chance. She at least did come and feed
> the
> cats, and I assume the litter boxes were reasonable when you returned. I
> think she should have left a note explaining she'd been pressed for time,
> hopefully she'll be more carefull in future.

I'd second this.

Personally if I were pressed for time, I'd leave a note explaining hey sorry
I cut you short a few times this week. Can we talk about it when you get
home and maybe work out a clear plan for next time it happens. For example
if I cut two visits short, I'd be willing to put on a movie and veg out with
the cats for a couple hours if the homeowner didn't mind or bring a book.
Also bring shrimpies to spread out if that was an acceptable treat etc.
Something to make up for the difference. It's not the refund or the lost
time but the quality of the visit *after* a cheated day or two I'd be more
concerned about if I were in your shoes.

My personal ethics wouldn't give you time to check the alarm system before
you were aware of the situation. So that would give me pause for question,
wondering if she'd hide it otherwise.

Question: Is there absolutely NO WAY she can alter the alarm system or
tamper with the times in the future?

Grace
Victor Martinez - 03 Jan 2006 04:34 GMT
> Question: Is there absolutely NO WAY she can alter the alarm system or
> tamper with the times in the future?

None at all. It's accessed through a secure website to which only I have
the password.

Signature

Victor M. Martinez
Owned and operated by the Fantastic Seven (TM)
Send your spam here: uce@ftc.gov
Email me here: pistorLITTER@BOXaustin.rr.com

Jo Firey - 02 Jan 2006 19:23 GMT
>I emailed our pet sitter with the following message:
>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> looking at other pet services in town and they all seem to be very
> impersonal.

I would be happy I had someone I felt I could at least trust with the house
and the cats physically, pay nothing in the way of a tip and probably not
accept the refund.

Otherwise you will be in the position of looking for someone else who may or
may not be as trustworthy.

While I understand your dismay at the amount of time spent, I also know just
how hard it can be to find someone even basically trustworthy.

Jo
jmcquown - 02 Jan 2006 19:51 GMT
> I emailed our pet sitter with the following message:
>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> damage. I've been looking at other pet services in town and they all
> seem to be very impersonal.

I think she gave you a fair (if not necessarily satisfactory) answer.  I'd
give her another chance; as others have said, at least now she knows the
alarm system monitors her comings and goings.

You at least have someone who didn't back up a truck and haul off all your
stuff, or throw a wild party in your house.  I would be very hesitant to
give anyone a key to my home.  You seem to have found a good person for
that.

Jill
Katrina - 02 Jan 2006 20:01 GMT
> I emailed our pet sitter with the following message:
>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> damage. I've been looking at other pet services in town and they all
> seem to be very impersonal.

I'm going to basically second what everyone else seems to be saying-
give her a second chance.  I do have to commend you on the tone of your
note to her- you didn't come across as accusing or beligerant... you
simply asked for an explanation and a clarification of her policy. Firm
but reasonable.  This is a very difficult balance to achieve.

Katrina
EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) - 02 Jan 2006 20:19 GMT
> I emailed our pet sitter with the following message:
>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> I've been looking at other pet services in town and they all seem to be
> very impersonal.

Sounds like she just accepted more clients for the Holidays
than she could comfortably handle.  (I suspect, now she
realizes you can actually keep track of the time she spends
there, she may be a bit more attentive.)   Having someone
trustworthy when you're not there is important, too - even
if a service is bonded, it doesn't guarantee the quality of
the service, and if the cats know this sitter, that's
something to consider, too. (And a sitter is generally more
acceptable to cats than a boarding kennel.)

I'm not sure what I'll do, if I move (as I'm planning to -
the rent here is just more than I can handle when my
part-time job goes away and I have to manage on my
retirement income).  I live in a pet-friendly building, and
the building manager has cats, so I pay her to see to my
babies when I'm on vacation.  I used to use a service here
called "Paws and Claws", who were very satisfactory, but
they don't have a telephone listing anymore, so I think they
may be out of business.
Enfilade - 02 Jan 2006 22:26 GMT
> Sounds like she just accepted more clients for the Holidays
> than she could comfortably handle.  (I suspect, now she
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> something to consider, too. (And a sitter is generally more
> acceptable to cats than a boarding kennel.)

If you have been happy with her in the past, I would say request the
refund, but let her know that you will hire her again as long as you
can be assured that she will be able to spend that requested 30 min
with your pets.  Do make sure she cant' tamper with the alarm system to
make it look like she's been there longer...it's an easy mistake to
make, leaving first 5, then 10, then 15 min early if you think the
boss/supervisor will never notice the difference.

Otherwise you face the option of sorting through a morass of other
available services, some of which may be worse or much more impersonal.

Here, if we're going away more than a couple days we board our cats at
a kennel.  If we're just going away for a few days, Dylan gets some of
his fellow medical students to look in on the krew.  

--Fil
David Stevenson - 02 Jan 2006 21:03 GMT
>I emailed our pet sitter with the following message:
>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>damage. I've been looking at other pet services in town and they all
>seem to be very impersonal.

  Take the refund and use her again.

Signature

David Stevenson              Storypage:  http://blakjak.com/sty_menu.htm
Liverpool, England, UK         <cat2@blakjak.com>         Emails welcome
Nanki Poo: SI O+W B 12 Y L+ W++ C+ I T+ A- E H++ V- F Q P+ B+ PA+ PL SC
Minke: SI W+Cp B 3 Y L W+ C++ I T A- E H++ V++ F- Q- P B PA+ PL+ SC-

Jane - 03 Jan 2006 19:38 GMT
>>What do you guys think I should do? She has worked for us for over 5
>>years and we've never had anything to complain about. When we went to
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>   Take the refund and use her again.

I agree. If she's been trustworthy and dependable for 5 years, it's
not worth the bother of trying to find someone else.  It's entirely
possible that she really did have an overly busy holiday season.

Jane
- owned and operated by Princess Rita
Marina - 04 Jan 2006 05:18 GMT
> I agree. If she's been trustworthy and dependable for 5 years, it's
> not worth the bother of trying to find someone else.  It's entirely
> possible that she really did have an overly busy holiday season.

It probably just goes to show what a good and dependable petsitter she
is. She has gained a lot of clients, and during the holiday season, they
all wanted her services and she didn't want to turn anyone down, a.
because she doesn't want to lose the business and b. because she really
cares about the pets that she looks after. I, too, say, keep her! Maybe
she should consider taking on seasonal help next year, though I suspect
she is the kind who doesn't like to delegate.

Signature

Marina, Miranda and Caliban. In loving memory of Frank and Nikki.
marina (dot) kurten (at) iki (dot) fi
Stories and pics at http://koti.welho.com/mkurten/
Pics at http://uk.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/frankiennikki/
and http://community.webshots.com/user/frankiennikki

rrb - 02 Jan 2006 22:12 GMT
> I emailed our pet sitter with the following message:
>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> I've been looking at other pet services in town and they all seem to be
> very impersonal.

As others have said I would give her another chance especially since she
has been your pet sitter for so long. But now that she knows about the
alarm system tracking she could manipulate it to make it look like she
has been there as she promised.
dnr - 03 Jan 2006 00:14 GMT
>> I emailed our pet sitter with the following message:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
> alarm system tracking she could manipulate it to make it look like she has
> been there as she promised.

Someone else suggested what's in your last sentence. We
have ADT home security. Have you ever tried "manipulating" a home security
system? They would be
out here in a heartbeat at such attempts; HOWEVER:
our system has "door/windows-opening" alarms which
gives entrant so many seconds to punch in an alarm code, plus "pet-free"
motion detectors inside which inform ADT
of movement above a certain height triggering action by them. Ignorant of
Victor's system safeguards such as this,
I remain skeptical of "manipulation" by petsitters, LOL.
Yowie - 02 Jan 2006 23:15 GMT
>I emailed our pet sitter with the following message:
>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> looking at other pet services in town and they all seem to be very
> impersonal.

I'd keep her. She is willing to make amends, and pay you back money. That
means alot in this world, IMHO. You may want to discuss with her how to
improve the service so you can be sur eyou're getting value for money - in
fact, it sounds like she needs to expand her business so that she isn't so
busy.

Keep it low key, casual and personable. Maybe a meeting at your place over
tea?

Yowie
Cheryl - 03 Jan 2006 02:09 GMT
> What do you guys think I should do? She has worked for us for
> over 5 years and we've never had anything to complain about.
> When we went to Paris and our hot water pipes broke, she called
> the city and had the water service turned off, which saved our
> house from significant damage. I've been looking at other pet
> services in town and they all seem to be very impersonal.

I read both posts; the rant one, and this one.  I'd give her another
chance. Her reply was sincere. I'm not sure I'd take a partial
refund, but the option is there for that. She didn't provide what she
said she'd provide, but the cats were fed, watered, boxes presumably
cleaned, and chances are she won't do it again. It's always risky to
leave our guys in the care of someone else. Even those who make a
living from our love of the furry ones. Find one you like for 5 years
so far, and you're way ahead of many.  :)

Signature

Cheryl

Victor Martinez - 03 Jan 2006 04:21 GMT
> refund, but the option is there for that. She didn't provide what she
> said she'd provide, but the cats were fed, watered, boxes presumably
> cleaned, and chances are she won't do it again. It's always risky to

Exactly. We're thinking of asking her to refund only those visits in
which she spent less than 10 minutes.

> leave our guys in the care of someone else. Even those who make a
> living from our love of the furry ones. Find one you like for 5 years
> so far, and you're way ahead of many.  :)

I know. I spent a part of the morning searching pet sitters in town and
I'm not happy with all those I've seen.
She is honest for sure, we've never had any problems of any kind. She's
even given Basho his meds when he was sick.

Signature

Victor M. Martinez
Owned and operated by the Fantastic Seven (TM)
Send your spam here: uce@ftc.gov
Email me here: pistorLITTER@BOXaustin.rr.com

Rhonda - 03 Jan 2006 05:37 GMT
>> refund, but the option is there for that. She didn't provide what she
>> said she'd provide, but the cats were fed, watered, boxes presumably
>> cleaned, and chances are she won't do it again. It's always risky to
>
> Exactly. We're thinking of asking her to refund only those visits in
> which she spent less than 10 minutes.

I guess one thing that would nag me is how many times in the past has
this happened? Has been busy all along and you just didn't find out
since there was no way to track her visits? I would be tempted to at
least ask if she normally stayed 30 minutes in the past.

At least you have a way to track it now, so that part of it wouldn't be
an issue.

Rhonda
-L. - 03 Jan 2006 08:30 GMT
> I read both posts; the rant one, and this one.  I'd give her another
> chance. Her reply was sincere. I'm not sure I'd take a partial
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> living from our love of the furry ones. Find one you like for 5 years
> so far, and you're way ahead of many.  :)

No kidding.  I have been lucky in all of the places I have lived, so
far <touch wood>.  While I know my pets get cared for I am also afraid
of what else a person might do - maybe not rob you blind but tell their
friends what you have in the home so *they* can rob you blind....that
kind of thing.

I am in the process of trying to hire a babysitter for the evenings so
DH and I can "date" again and my current pet sitter has stepped up to
the plate.  I like her so much I will trust her with my kid!

-L.
Howard C. Berkowitz - 03 Jan 2006 02:18 GMT
> What do you guys think I should do? She has worked for us for over 5
> years and we've never had anything to complain about. When we went to
> Paris and our hot water pipes broke, she called the city and had the
> water service turned off, which saved our house from significant damage.
> I've been looking at other pet services in town and they all seem to be
> very impersonal.

My sense is also to give her a second chance, spelling things out in
more detail. I'm reminded, a bit, of the statistics on doctors that
wind up in the least malpractice problems. The best group are proactive
in telling people the problems.  The second group is much like your
catsitter -- when something is brought up, take responsibility and
offer to correct the problem in some way. The third group gets sued.
Pat - 03 Jan 2006 02:49 GMT
> I'm reminded, a bit, of the statistics on doctors that
> wind up in the least malpractice problems. The best group are proactive
> in telling people the problems.  The second group is much like your
> catsitter -- when something is brought up, take responsibility and
> offer to correct the problem in some way. The third group gets sued.

Historically in China all doctors had to hang a sign outside their offices
disclosing how many of their patients had died. Too bad that practice is not
standard all over the world, today.
Howard C. Berkowitz - 03 Jan 2006 04:10 GMT
> > I'm reminded, a bit, of the statistics on doctors that
> > wind up in the least malpractice problems. The best group are proactive
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> disclosing how many of their patients had died. Too bad that practice is not
> standard all over the world, today.

I remember a resident's autobiography, early in the age of organ
transplants. He was working on a holiday weekend, and decided he needed
senior surgeon backup for what seemed more than a standard
appendectomy.  As it turned out, the on-call surgeon was the head of
the transplantation service, and the resident was embarrassed to call
this dignitary.

The transplantation surgeon told him not to worry, and that he was
actually glad to help out in a procedure where he would be sure the
patient would survive, commenting that most of his patients died.

Death rates don't mean much until you look at relative death rates for
the specialty, and indeed the supporting services at hospitals, when
involved.
Adrian - 03 Jan 2006 11:43 GMT
>> I'm reminded, a bit, of the statistics on doctors that
>> wind up in the least malpractice problems. The best group are
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> offices disclosing how many of their patients had died. Too bad that
> practice is not standard all over the world, today.

Can the doctor say if they all died of old age? ;o)
Signature

Adrian (Owned by Snoopy and Bagheera)
A House is not a home, without a cat.
http://community.webshots.com/user/clowderuk

sriddles@aol.com - 04 Jan 2006 05:53 GMT
> > I'm reminded, a bit, of the statistics on doctors that
> > wind up in the least malpractice problems. The best group are proactive
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> disclosing how many of their patients had died. Too bad that practice is not
> standard all over the world, today.

Aren't there statistics kept somewhere on doctors? Howard? I seem to
remember my daughter talking about "positive outcome."  It sounded like
some "positive outcomes" are more positive for the doctor than the
patient.

Sherry
Lesley - 13 Jan 2006 10:06 GMT
Aren't there statistics kept somewhere on doctors? Howard? I seem to
> remember my daughter talking about "positive outcome."  It sounded like
> some "positive outcomes" are more positive for the doctor than the
> patient.

Medical doublespeak is amazing. My personal favourite was a research
paper and I think (don't quote me) they had statistics for patients who
died of the thing they were trying to treat and statistics about
patients who died of something else...

So there where two tables...the first one was headed "Fatal deaths" and
the second?....(Drumroll!)... "Non-fatal deaths"

That's the kind of death I'd like!!!! Can you imagine a doctor saying
to someone's nearest and dearest "S/he's dead but at least it's not
fatal"

Lesley

Slave of the Fabulous Furballs
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 03 Jan 2006 05:13 GMT
> What do you guys think I should do? She has worked for us for over 5
> years and we've never had anything to complain about. When we went to
> Paris and our hot water pipes broke, she called the city and had the
> water service turned off, which saved our house from significant damage.
> I've been looking at other pet services in town and they all seem to be
> very impersonal.

I say give her another chance. She wrote what sounds like to me a very
heartfelt apology. And the fact that she has gone beyond the call of duty
in the past shows that she is responsible and trustworthy, as well as
having a personal relationship with you, which as you note, is not easy
to find.

You might want to discuss with her what you can expect from her in the
future, should she have another busy period and be pressed for time. It
sounds like she genuinely wants to keep working for you and to give you
your money's worth, but at the same time, she did justify spending less
time with your cats because she was busy. So it sounds like you should
tell her that's not acceptable, and then see what she says. Find out if
she's willing to commit to a minimum of 30 minutes per visit no matter
what else is going on in her schedule. I think that if she can't do that,
then she's overbooking herself and selling all of her clients short.

Joyce
Sam Nash - 04 Jan 2006 01:43 GMT
>I emailed our pet sitter with the following message:
<snipped>
I read through the entire thread before responding.  I agree with most of
the other respondents.  You've been happy with her in the past as,
presumably, the clowder.  She has gone above and beyond her duties in the
past (having your water shut off when necessary).  You deem her sufficiently
trustworthy to give her access to your home in your absence (presumably with
nothing missing on your return).

She did overbook this time.  That's all you'll ever really know about.

Both your letter and her response were calm and professional (kudos to both
of you for that).

Bottom line:  sit down with her and make sure your expectations are crystal
clear.  If you expect her to spend 30 minutes every time she's there, you
both need to agree to that.  But keep her on -- good pet sitters are hard to
find.

As to the refund, that's up to you as to how much, if anything, you want her
to pony up.

Sam, closely supervised by Mistletoe
Karen AKA Kajikit - 04 Jan 2006 18:07 GMT
I agree with everyone else in the thread... good pet sitters are hard
to find. She sounds honest and she's been reliable in the past and
presumably the animals like her... I don't know that I'd take the
refund offer - but since you have the actual record of her visits
maybe ask for the ones that were REALLY short.

Signature

~Karen aka Kajikit
Crafts, cats, and chocolate - the three essentials of life
http://www.kajikitscorner.com
Online photo album - http://community.webshots.com/user/kajikit

Yowie - 05 Jan 2006 11:00 GMT
Any updates?

Yowie
Duke of URL - 06 Jan 2006 00:40 GMT
Victor Martinez @ me@nospam.com

> I emailed our pet sitter with the following message:
>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> damage. I've been looking at other pet services in town and they all
> seem to be very impersonal.

Given that she's not caused you any complaints for five years, that she had
a reasonable explanation, and that (especially) she promptly offered a
refund, my opinion is: Keep Her. Sounds like a gem.
Signature

Moses Lambert PO1(SW) USN(ret)
Cliologist, Philanthropologist, Prothonotary Wibbler,
Paleoconservative, Surface Warrior Squid, Itinerant Philosoph

Jean Hobbs - 13 Jan 2006 04:59 GMT
I know this is a bit late Victor but I haven't been on rpca for quite a
while
and dont think all my posts are getting through now, but I hope you kept
your sitter if you've had her for 5yrs she can't be too bad, and she had a
reasonable exuse, and the cats obviously know her by now  Jean.P.

> I emailed our pet sitter with the following message:
>
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
> Send your spam here: uce@ftc.gov
> Email me here: pistorLITTER@BOXaustin.rr.com
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.