 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue CatKB.com Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map |
Cat Forum / Cat Anecdotes / January 2006Spare Purrs Please
I don't feel safe enough here any more (due to my stalker) to post why, but I'm dealing with a *bad* bout of depression this morning. Any spare purrs you might have would be greatly appreciated. Hugs, CatNipped > I don't feel safe enough here any more (due to my stalker) to post > why, but I'm dealing with a *bad* bout of depression this morning. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > CatNipped Purrs from Snoopy and Baggy, actually it's snores from Snoopy at the moment but she says they're just as good.  SignatureAdrian (Owned by Snoopy and Bagheera) A House is not a home, without a cat. http://community.webshots.com/user/clowderuk > I don't feel safe enough here any more (due to my stalker) to post why, but > I'm dealing with a *bad* bout of depression this morning. Any spare purrs [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > CatNipped I haven't been reading much lately, but you can have all the spare (and non-spare) purrs from my bunch. Hope things look brighter soon. Smokie Darling (Annie) > I don't feel safe enough here any more (due to my stalker) to post > why, but I'm dealing with a *bad* bout of depression this morning. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > CatNipped Warm purrs on the way from icy Ontario, Canada. > I don't feel safe enough here any more (due to my stalker) to post why, but > I'm dealing with a *bad* bout of depression this morning. Any spare purrs [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > CatNipped Sorry, honey. I think most of us deal with some sort of depression, in one way or another. If you need an ear within the next hour and a half, you can e-mail me privately. Just remove the NOSPAM in my address. kili > I don't feel safe enough here any more (due to my stalker) to post why, but > I'm dealing with a *bad* bout of depression this morning. Any spare purrs > you might have would be greatly appreciated. Absolutely! We're sending you bunches of purrs. >I don't feel safe enough here any more (due to my stalker) to post why, but >I'm dealing with a *bad* bout of depression this morning. Any spare purrs >you might have would be greatly appreciated. Purrs and doggy-wags a'comin' post haste. Hope everything turns out well and you feel better soonest!! Hugs. Jeanne >I don't feel safe enough here any more (due to my stalker) to post why, but >I'm dealing with a *bad* bout of depression this morning. Any spare purrs [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > CatNipped Lots of purrs and headbutts on the way. Julie, Hobbes, Selena, Lacey, Sam and Barnabus Thank you all! Part of what has me feeling down is that I didn't even get to say goodbye to the girls before they left (I had a business meeting to attend when they left on the 16th, and I didn't know they wouldn't be coming back). Now they'll be in school in New Orleans when Erin comes back here to pick up the rest of their things and get the dogs, so they won't be making the trip with her. I've been missing them terribly. Since Greg's sister and her husband won't be staying there after all, Erin, Greg, and the girls will be staying with his mother until they get their FEMA trailer, so I can't even take some time to go down and visit with them for quite a while. I understand that Erin wants to be with her husband, and the girls want to be with their father, and this is a *GOOD* thing that they can stay there, but I *hate* how quiet this house has become. :< Hugs, CatNipped >I don't feel safe enough here any more (due to my stalker) to post why, but >I'm dealing with a *bad* bout of depression this morning. Any spare purrs [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > CatNipped > Thank you all! > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > CatNipped Who'da thunk it huh? We get to where we enjoy the "peace and quiet", then the noise (grandkids) begins, and we think we can't take it, then it's quiet and we hate it. Much sympathy, and extra offerings to get you through the blues and the "missing". SD (Annie) - rather like empty nest all over again, huh? > >I don't feel safe enough here any more (due to my stalker) to post why, but > >I'm dealing with a *bad* bout of depression this morning. Any spare purrs [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > > > CatNipped >> Thank you all! >> [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] >> > >> > CatNipped Gee, think of the "good side" -- less housework! Best wishes for a great New Year. MLB Belated purrs C'nipped. I hope you're better now. Suz&Spicey > I don't feel safe enough here any more (due to my stalker) to post why, but > I'm dealing with a *bad* bout of depression this morning. Any spare purrs > you might have would be greatly appreciated. Sending my prayers. Not to worry about your stalker, Lori. She's about a quarter-inch from putting herself away. For real. > I don't feel safe enough here any more (due to my stalker) to post why, but > I'm dealing with a *bad* bout of depression this morning. Any spare purrs [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > CatNipped Is there a storm in the offing? Could be caused b barometric pressure. Best wishes. MLB >> I don't feel safe enough here any more (due to my stalker) to post why, >> but [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > Is there a storm in the offing? Could be caused b barometric pressure. > Best wishes. MLB Not here, although we could *really* use the rain. But, unbelievably there is a *27TH* tropical storm ("Zeta") brewing in the Atlantic!!!!! Hugs, CatNipped >>> I don't feel safe enough here any more (due to my stalker) to post >>> why, but [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > CatNipped So if there any more after that, what will the next one be called? SignatureAdrian (Owned by Snoopy and Bagheera) A House is not a home, without a cat. http://community.webshots.com/user/clowderuk >>>> I don't feel safe enough here any more (due to my stalker) to post >>>> why, but [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > So if there any more after that, what will the next one be called? I though Zeta was the last letter of the Greek alphabet also (corresponding to Z in ours), but it's not, it's only the 6th letter. Here's the whole Greek alphabet: Alpha Beta Gamma Delta Epsilon Zeta Eta Theta Iota Kappa Lamda Mu Nu Xi Omikron Pi Rho Sigma Tau Upsilon Phi Chi Psi Omega Hugs, CatNipped >>>>> I don't feel safe enough here any more (due to my stalker) to post >>>>> why, but [quoted text clipped - 55 lines] > > CatNipped That reminds me of a limerick, There was a young vicar in Kew, Whose cat used to sit on a pew, He taught him each week, A letter of Greek, But never got further than Mu. SignatureAdrian (Owned by Snoopy and Bagheera) A House is not a home, without a cat. http://community.webshots.com/user/clowderuk >>>>>> I don't feel safe enough here any more (due to my stalker) to post >>>>>> why, but [quoted text clipped - 63 lines] > A letter of Greek, > But never got further than Mu. A clean limerick! I didn't know such a creature existed in nature!!! ;> SignatureHugs, CatNipped See all my masters at: http://www.PossiblePlaces.com/CatNipped/ <<<<<snip>> >>>I though Zeta was the last letter of the Greek alphabet also >>>(corresponding to Z in ours), but it's not, it's only the 6th letter. [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] > > A clean limerick! I didn't know such a creature existed in nature!!! ;> There are plenty of those. Used to know quite a few, but can't remember but one of them now. It's kinda cat-related, as it has a tiger in it. :) There was a young lady of Riga Who smilingly rode on a tiger They returned from the ride With the lady inside And the smile on the face of the tiger. I also put "limericks" into google for a quick search, but got so many pages I just skimmed thru them. SignatureChristine in Vantaa, Finland christal63 (at) gmail (dot) com photos: http://photos.yahoo.com/christal63 photos: http://community.webshots.com/user/chkr63 >> Not here, although we could *really* use the rain. But, unbelievably >> there is a *27TH* tropical storm ("Zeta") brewing in the Atlantic!!!!! [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > So if there any more after that, what will the next one be called? If I remember my greek correctly, next would be eta, then kappa, then lambda. > If I remember my greek correctly, next would be eta, then kappa, then > lambda./// The mind boggles at a storm doing the Lambada. Helen M - in a very silly mood. > Dec 30, 2005 at 07:48 PM "Dan M" <dan@wolf.com> wrote in message news:pan.2005.12.30.18.52.30.942371@wolf.com > If I remember my greek correctly, next would be eta, then kappa, then > lambda./// The mind boggles at a storm doing the Lambada. Helen M - in a very silly mood. ======================================== After reading about kitten antic I'm feeling silly. I was thinking they could name it Cowabunga. Suz Purrs, prayers and happy thoughts from us to you. Lily & her mama SignatureIrulan from the stars we come to the stars we return from now until the end of time >I don't feel safe enough here any more (due to my stalker) to post why, but >I'm dealing with a *bad* bout of depression this morning. Any spare purrs [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > CatNipped >I don't feel safe enough here any more (due to my stalker) to post why, but >I'm dealing with a *bad* bout of depression this morning. Any spare purrs [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > CatNipped Jake will be forwarding purrs as soon as he gets over this mornings snit over the existence of d^gs in creation. I'll remind Molly to forward some you way as well. Kayla offers wags and nips. Jo Purrs are on the way. If you want to talk about it in email, feel free. My edress isn't munged. SignatureJoy **Don't believe everything you think** > I don't feel safe enough here any more (due to my stalker) to post why, but > I'm dealing with a *bad* bout of depression this morning. Any spare purrs [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > CatNipped Purrs on the way. Ann Signatureread Sam's blog at http://kittens-3.blogspot.com/ see pictures of Sam at http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/ann791/my_photos >I don't feel safe enough here any more (due to my stalker) to post why, but >I'm dealing with a *bad* bout of depression this morning. Any spare purrs [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > CatNipped > I don't feel safe enough here any more (due to my stalker) to post > why, but I'm dealing with a *bad* bout of depression this morning. > Any spare purrs you might have would be greatly appreciated. I'm sorry you're feeling depressed. I go through these myself - living alone, not working full-time (and working at home when I do work), I can get pretty isolated. And this year, for the first time in many, many years, I don't have really special plans for New Year's Eve. I've always spent it with a partner, or some very close friends. I do have invitations to a couple of parties, so I won't sit at home, at least. Anyway, I don't know why you're depressed, but I share your mood nonetheless. Purrs! I'm going to offer some advice, which, since it is unsolicited, you are free to ignore. :) But I insist that you put your stalker into your killfile. If you continue to read her posts, they will continue to disturb you and make you feel unsafe on this ng. Remove her from your conciousness, and you'll be amazed at how much better you'll feel. I just don't understand why anyone would continue to read things that hurt them, that seems a bit masochistic to me. Just dump the b*tch!! Hope you feel better soon. Joyce > > I don't feel safe enough here any more (due to my stalker) to post > > why, but I'm dealing with a *bad* bout of depression this morning. [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > > Joyce I agree, and if it were just an obnoxious b*tch I'd do just that. But some people verge on being dangerously disturbed - and I won't turn my back on somebody who could possibly do harm to my family. I don't ever let what she says bother me - I just consider the source. But there are times when I don't want to leave my family open to the sh*t she throws through her bars (or *from* her bar by the sound of her posts). Hugs, CatNipped > I agree, and if it were just an obnoxious b*tch I'd do just that. But some > people verge on being dangerously disturbed - and I won't turn my back on > somebody who could possibly do harm to my family. If you are talking about me, you are being ridiculous. No one is in any danger from me. I merely dare to voice an opinion that differs from others. If you think this makes me "dangerous", it is *you* who are seriously disturbed. I don't ever let what she > says bother me - I just consider the source. But there are times when I > don't want to leave my family open to the sh*t she throws through her bars [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > CatNipped If you are willing to do so, please send me an email. I am willing to discuss this with you rationally, person to person, privately, but I am not willing to email you directly as long as you use words like "stalker". Consider this an olive branch, and yes, I am being sincere. -L. > I'm going to offer some advice, which, since it is unsolicited, you are > free to ignore. :) But I insist that you put your stalker into your > killfile. If you continue to read her posts, they will continue to disturb > you and make you feel unsafe on this ng. Remove her from your conciousness, > and you'll be amazed at how much better you'll feel. This is good advice, and would be enough in most circumstances. The trouble is, she and her little psycho friends take it to real life. CN actually got a telephone call one day, and there is a possibility one of her stalkers actually contacted her boss at her old job. We are talking STALKER here, not just Usenet nuisance. And CN is not alone. > This is good advice, and would be enough in most circumstances. > The trouble is, she and her little psycho friends take it to real life. > CN actually got a telephone call one day, and there is a possibility one of > her stalkers actually contacted her boss at her old job. We are > talking STALKER here, not just Usenet nuisance. And CN is > not alone. Hmm... well, maybe some of the folks on this NG still read the psycho's posts, and could warn Lori if it looked like she was going to do more than spew verbal abuse? That way, Lori doesn't need to read the abuse. I also think that if she disengages from any interaction with the stalker, it's less likely that things will escalate into real life retaliation. But I might be wrong, as I'm lucky enough to have never had a stalker myself. Still, given that, I can understand why Lori might not want to divulge specific information about the whereabouts of her family members. Lori: if there have been any actual threats, you can file a police report. They probably can't do anything about vague online threats, but it will be on record in case things do escalate. There are stalker laws in many states, but I don't know how it works on the Internet when the stalker lives outside your state. Good luck, Joyce > This is good advice, and would be enough in most circumstances. > The trouble is, she and her little psycho friends take it to real life. If you are talking about me, you are sadly mistaken. I have never even emailed either you or Lori. I have not "stalked" you. You are committing libel. In fact the only thing I have *ever* done to either of you is called you on the carpet publicly via newsgroup postings (which is my first ammendement right) for being idiots and a.sholes in terms of what you post and how you treat others. That's the ONLY thing I have ever "done" to you. OTOH, It is *you* who took these flamewars to real life. You called my local police department and cried to them because I used your real name. Something you, yourself, had done to ME (and my husband, and MINOR child and brother) for months prior. The only difference is that you have no spine and hide like a coward behind an anonymous remailer, and I have the guts to post under my own ISP. That's ok though - you aren't very smart. We have ISP addresses that link back to you so we know exactly who you really are. You are no longer anonymous. > CN actually got a telephone call one day, Lori received one pone call from Megan, to whom she had given her phone number. If one does not want someone to call them, they do not give out their phone number. Surely you are smart enough to understand that. Furthermore, I have absolutely no association with Megan. I know Megan from the newsgroups and that is all. It is only in your head that there is some "consiracy" to stalk you. The truth is, you (and Lori) have willingly participated in the newsgroup flamewars for over a year, and continue to do so. You have many people who dislike you because of it. You alienated an entire newsgroup - all of the old regulars from H+B left because of you. The majority of this newsgroup - rpca- has you killfiled as well. Look in the f.cking mirror and take some responsibility for why people hate you. You are no victim, no matter how hard you try to rewrite history. Anyone who has been around for any length of time knows the truth despite what you now try to tell newbies. You are not fooling anyone. All one has to do is search for "Mary S." and "Conan" to get a little taste of why people despise you on these newsgroups. And that search is the tip of the iceberg. > and there is a possibility one of > her stalkers actually contacted her boss at her old job. We are > talking STALKER here, not just Usenet nuisance. Bullshit. You are committing libel. Post proof or you may find yourself on the receiveing end of a lawsuit. The fact is, you can't prove what you are saying because none of it is true. -L. "-L." <gentleboa@peacemail.com> wrote... >> This is good advice, and would be enough in most circumstances. >> The trouble is, she and her little psycho friends take it to real life. > > If you are talking about me, you are sadly mistaken. Why are you assuming she's talking about you? (If the shoe fits, etc.) > You are committing libel. Who is she libeling? She didn't name names. > "-L." <gentleboa@peacemail.com> wrote... > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Who is she libeling? She didn't name names. Oh look - another anonymous dickwad. Charming. Do you always spawn together like this? -L. > "-L." <gentleboa@peacemail.com> wrote... > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Why are you assuming she's talking about you? > (If the shoe fits, etc.) Because she has referred to me recently as "stalker Lyn". I suspect you already know this. Why must you insist on posting anonymously? No spine? -L. > "-L." <gentleboa@peacemail.com> wrote... > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Why are you assuming she's talking about you? > (If the shoe fits, etc.) She has referred to me recently as "stalker Lyn" which is libelous. I suspect you already know this. Besides, I did not "assume" anything. I said IF she was talking about me, she is sadly mistaken. Do you have a reading comprehension problem? Why must you insist on posting anonymously? No spine? -L. > This is good advice, and would be enough in most circumstances. > The trouble is, she and her little psycho friends take it to real life. If you are talking about me, you are sadly mistaken. I have never even emailed either you or Lori. I have not "stalked" you. You are committing libel. In fact the only thing I have *ever* done to either of you is called you on the carpet publicly via newsgroup postings (which is my first ammendement right) for being idiots and a.sholes in terms of what you post and how you treat others. That's the ONLY thing I have ever "done" to you. OTOH, It is *you* who took these flamewars to real life. You called my local police department and cried to them because I used your real name. Something you, yourself, had done to ME (and my husband, and MINOR child and brother) for months prior. The only difference is that you have no spine and hide like a coward behind an anonymous remailer, and I have the guts to post under my own ISP. That's ok though - you aren't very smart. We have ISP addresses that link back to you so we know exactly who you really are. You are no longer anonymous. > CN actually got a telephone call one day, Lori received one pone call from Megan, to whom she had given her phone number. If one does not want someone to call them, they do not give out their phone number. Surely you are smart enough to understand that. Furthermore, I have absolutely no association with Megan. I know Megan from the newsgroups and that is all. It is only in your head that there is some "consiracy" to stalk you. The truth is, you (and Lori) have willingly participated in the newsgroup flamewars for over a year, and continue to do so. You have many people who dislike you because of it. You alienated an entire newsgroup - all of the old regulars from H+B left because of you. The majority of this newsgroup - rpca- has you killfiled as well. Look in the f.cking mirror and take some responsibility for why people hate you. You are no victim, no matter how hard you try to rewrite history. Anyone who has been around for any length of time knows the truth despite what you now try to tell newbies. You are not fooling anyone. All one has to do is search for "Mary S." and "Conan" to get a little taste of why people despise you on these newsgroups. And that search is the tip of the iceberg. > and there is a possibility one of > her stalkers actually contacted her boss at her old job. We are > talking STALKER here, not just Usenet nuisance. Bullshit. You are committing libel. Post proof or you may find yourself on the receiveing end of a lawsuit. The fact is, you can't prove what you are saying because none of it is true. -L. > This is good advice, and would be enough in most circumstances. > The trouble is, she and her little psycho friends take it to real life. If you are talking about me, you are sadly mistaken. I have never even emailed either you or Lori. I have not "stalked" you. You are committing libel. In fact the only thing I have *ever* done to either of you is called you on the carpet publicly via newsgroup postings (which is my first ammendement right) for being idiots and a.sholes in terms of what you post and how you treat others. That's the ONLY thing I have ever "done" to you. OTOH, It is *you* who took these flamewars to real life. You called my local police department and cried to them because I used your real name. Something you, yourself, had done to ME (and my husband, and MINOR child and brother) for months prior. The only difference is that you have no spine and hide like a coward behind an anonymous remailer, and I have the guts to post under my own ISP. That's ok though - you aren't very smart. We have ISP addresses that link back to you so we know exactly who you really are. You are no longer anonymous. > CN actually got a telephone call one day, Lori received one pone call from Megan, to whom she had given her phone number. If one does not want someone to call them, they do not give out their phone number. Surely you are smart enough to understand that. Furthermore, I have absolutely no association with Megan. I know Megan from the newsgroups and that is all. It is only in your head that there is some "consiracy" to stalk you. The truth is, you (and Lori) have willingly participated in the newsgroup flamewars for over a year, and continue to do so. You have many people who dislike you because of it. You alienated an entire newsgroup - all of the old regulars from H+B left because of you. The majority of this newsgroup - rpca- has you killfiled as well. Look in the f.cking mirror and take some responsibility for why people hate you. You are no victim, no matter how hard you try to rewrite history. Anyone who has been around for any length of time knows the truth despite what you now try to tell newbies. You are not fooling anyone. All one has to do is search for "Mary S." and "Conan" to get a little taste of why people despise you on these newsgroups. And that search is the tip of the iceberg. > and there is a possibility one of > her stalkers actually contacted her boss at her old job. We are > talking STALKER here, not just Usenet nuisance. Bullshit. You are committing libel. Post proof or you may find yourself on the receiveing end of a lawsuit. The fact is, you can't prove what you are saying because none of it is true. -L. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- From: "-L." <gentleboa@peacemail.com> >If you are talking about me, you are sadly mistaken. I have never even >emailed either you or Lori. I have not "stalked" you. You are >committing libel. <snip> >Bullshit. You are committing libel. Post proof or you may find >yourself on the receiveing end of a lawsuit. I can see the headlines now: "UNNAMED INDIVIDUAL SUES USENET NYM OVER AMBIGUOUS STATEMENTS" Hint: You blew your libel case in the first six words of your post. >I don't feel safe enough here any more (due to my stalker) to post why, but >I'm dealing with a *bad* bout of depression this morning. Any spare purrs [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > CatNipped Purrs in large doses, although late, coming your way. Sam > I don't feel safe enough here any more (due to my stalker) to post why, but > I'm dealing with a *bad* bout of depression this morning. Any spare purrs [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > CatNipped I honestly don't know whether you realize it or not, or whether it's deliberate or not, but you really could avoid the volatile and antagonizing element in your posts. Example: "I'm dealing with a *bad* bout of depression this morning. I don't feel comfortable posting details, but any spare purrs you might have would be greatly appreciated." Sherry > I honestly don't know whether you realize it or not, or whether it's > deliberate or not, but you really could avoid the volatile and [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Sherry Of course she realizes it; it's deliberate, Sherry. Just read her other posts to the thread. She has been a on-going, active participant in these flame wars for over a year. The ball is in her court, though. She can end it if she wants to. -L. > I honestly don't know whether you realize it or not, or whether it's > deliberate or not, but you really could avoid the volatile and > antagonizing element in your posts. > Example: > "I'm dealing with a *bad* bout of depression this morning. I don't feel > comfortable posting details, but any spare purrs you might have would > be greatly appreciated." What? There is nothing antagonizing about this. I don't understand this post at all. Which part of this is volatile? Joyce > > I honestly don't know whether you realize it or not, or whether it's > > deliberate or not, but you really could avoid the volatile and [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Joyce What I mean is, making reference to a "stalker" (and everybody knows who she is referring to) was not necessary to convey the message she desired. It was thrown in to "poke Lyn with a stick" so to speak. And it worked, didn't it? I know you all think Lyn is the Devil, but most of you didn't read rrphb back when Catnipped was attacking Lyn, her weight, her child, etc. etc. then called the police on her. Retaliation is what CN is dealing with now, and it sucks when it comes to roost in your own back yard. All I am saying, really, is that if you don't want to be flamed, post-humped, or whatever you call it, don't throw in little innuendos and between-the-lines accusations. Sherry > > > I honestly don't know whether you realize it or not, or whether it's > > > deliberate or not, but you really could avoid the volatile and [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > Retaliation is what CN is dealing with now, and it sucks when it comes > to roost in your own back yard. You are so deluded. CN did NONE of these things. You don't get to make it up as you go along. Are you having some sort of arterial flow to the brain problem? ALL CN did was defend me when you and everyone else jumped on the bully train. For this your good friend (at the moment, you do change like the wind) Lyn accused her of burning her cat with a curling iron. I used to think you were just wishy washy, but now I am beginning to think you might be having some memory problems. And some of them are mighty convenient. > Are you having some sort of arterial flow to the brain problem? It's remarks like this one that has you in practically everyone's killfile. I am very sorry for whatever it is that makes you so mean-spirited. Sherry > > Are you having some sort of arterial flow to the brain problem? > > It's remarks like this one that has you in practically everyone's > killfile. I am very sorry for whatever it is that makes you so > mean-spirited. Right. And your comments to CN were made in the interest of sisterly love. You just accused her of things she did not do. We have been over this before. If you are going to back a stalker like Lyn you had better get your facts straight. You probably don't remember emailing me years ago talking about all the hypocrites in this group. I suppose I should be glad of that since I had assumed that you did remember and were just the biggest hypocrite of all. You are a nasty piece of work, just like your good friend Lyn. You aren't as rabid as she is, but that is just because you lack the guts to be. At least in public. You are pretty damned brutal in email. > Right. And your comments to CN were made in the interest of > sisterly love. > > You just accused her of things she did not do. All anyone has to do is a simple Google search to find out the truth. She attacked me, my kid, my parenting skills and my weight - not to mention dragging some piddly-a.s comment I made here (not even about her, BTW) over to H+B to start a flame war, more than once. Lori is no innocent. We have been > over this before. If you are going to back a stalker like Lyn you > had better get your facts straight. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > the guts to be. At least in public. You are pretty damned brutal > in email. Pretty ironic coming from an "anonymous" coward. -L. <sriddles@aol.com> wrote : > What I mean is, making reference to a "stalker" (and everybody knows > who she is referring to) was not necessary to convey the message she > desired. It was thrown in to "poke Lyn with a stick" so to speak. Actually, no. Lyn and friends go "real life" on people over Usenet disputes. Contacting their places of business, harrassing their loved ones. Posting personal information. That is called "stalking" and "harrassment" and is indeed a punishable misdemeanor or felony in most states. By calling Lyn a stalker, CN was just being accurate. A big clue for you: the police do not get involved over Usenet alone. Period. Think about it. > <sriddles@aol.com> wrote : > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Actually, no. Lyn and friends go "real life" on people over Usenet > disputes. Contacting their places of business, harrassing their loved ones. Now you have commited libel. Post proof or STFU. I have never done any of those things and I know of no one who has. These are the same accusations you made to the police and all of those accusations were found to be groundless. You are treading on *very* thin ice here. In that same conversation with the police, you claimed that you do not participate in these newsgroups. You have now proved, once again, that you lied to the police. Keep it up - you are doing a really good job of nailing yourself to the wall. > Posting personal information. The only thing I have ever done is used your name which was posted by someone else. I used your town which you, yourself have revealed. Both os these things you did to me as well - and you also revealed my son's name, my husband's name, my brother's name, and a town in which I own property. >That is called "stalking" and "harrassment" > and is indeed a punishable misdemeanor or felony in most states. Prove it. Just prove it. You cannot because it never happened. > By calling Lyn a stalker, CN was just being accurate. There you go again. > A big clue for you: the police do not get involved over > Usenet alone. Period. Think about it. The police get involved when someone calls crying and complaining that someone is harassing them. They do an investigation, which they did, and there was absolutely NO PROOF to any of your accusations other than the fact that I used your name. You are a LIAR and have now committed libel. Congratulations. It's all documented in the archives now. If you are smart you will now shut your mouth and stop libeling yourself. -L. >> > I honestly don't know whether you realize it or not, or whether it's >> > deliberate or not, but you really could avoid the volatile and [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > rrphb back when Catnipped was attacking Lyn, her weight, her child, > etc. etc. then called the police on her. ****WHAT****?????!!!!! I MOST CERTAINLY DID NONE OF THOSE THINGS - HOW DARE YOU ACCUSE ME OF THAT!!!!!!!! Sherry, you'd better back up those accusations right now or STAY OUT OF THIS AND STFU! > Retaliation is what CN is dealing with now, and it sucks when it comes > to roost in your own back yard. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Sherry > Sherry, you'd better back up those accusations right now or STAY OUT OF THIS > AND STFU! I have, before. Google rphb. We aren't dragging the whole group through the muck, but you're welcome to e-mail me. My address is not munged. Sherry >> Sherry, you'd better back up those accusations right now or STAY OUT OF >> THIS [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Sherry *YOU* chose to lie on this group quite publicly - now you want me to email you privately to defend myself against those lies?? No thank you - post *RIGHT HERE* the posts where I said any of those things! If you can't prove your lies here then STFU! > >> Sherry, you'd better back up those accusations right now or STAY OUT OF > >> THIS [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > *RIGHT HERE* the posts where I said any of those things! If you can't prove > your lies here then STFU! > *YOU* chose to lie on this group quite publicly - now you want me to email > you privately to defend myself against those lies?? No thank you - post > *RIGHT HERE* the posts where I said any of those things! If you can't prove > your lies here then STFU! " What's the matter Lynnie? Doesn't Will stick up for you? Or is he ashamed to be married to such a fat scumbag? And I'm sure you wouldn't post pictures of your a.s - all that blubber would make people ill. Besides which, you show your a.s constantly without us having to see pictures of all that nasty fat!" or maybe "...I hope Jonathan doesn't get a URI or the adoption agency may be getting a call - right Mommy Dearest? " Do those posts ring a bell? But I do apologize for mistakenly believing it was you who called the police on Lyn. Sherry >> *YOU* chose to lie on this group quite publicly - now you want me to [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > Besides which, you show your a.s constantly without us having to see > pictures of all that nasty fat!" I didn't write that, "Mary" did. You keep doing this and you're not helping to make things any better by attributing someone else's post to me. > or maybe > > "...I hope Jonathan doesn't get a URI or the adoption agency > may be getting a call - right Mommy Dearest? " Yes, I wrote that one after the umpteenth time that Lyn accused me of burning my cat - and I lashed out. But you don't quote what she said to me, and you don't chide her for it either. It's just me you have a problem with, and I don't know why, but hey, that's UseNet for you! > Do those posts ring a bell? > But I do apologize for mistakenly believing it was you who called the > police on Lyn. > > Sherry > > " What's the matter Lynnie? Doesn't Will stick up for you? Or is he > > ashamed to be married to such a fat scumbag? And I'm sure you wouldn't [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > I didn't write that, "Mary" did. You keep doing this and you're not helping > to make things any better by attributing someone else's post to me. Lori, I am not trying to argue for the sake of argument, and I tried to get you to move this discussion to e-mail, where it belongs. Instead you called me a liar and told me to "STFU" But you DID write that post, in this thread: Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 08:49:15 -0500 Local: Wed, Jul 6 2005 7:49 am Subject: Re: No San Diego Home for Conan (bad words used) Now, please drop it. The only reason I even mentioned the whole thing is that you seem so surprised that you get post-humped all the time. I only intended to point out that if you left out the "digs" in your posts, you wouldn't have that problem. Since you are waxing nostalgic about the "safe zone" yourself, I would appreciate it if you left comments like "STFU" for your posts in the other newsgroups, not here. Or tell me to STFU through e-mail. I really don't care. Sherry > Yes, I wrote that one after the umpteenth time that Lyn accused me of > burning my cat - and I lashed out. But you don't quote what she said to me, > and you don't chide her for it either. It's just me you have a problem > with, and I don't know why, but hey, that's UseNet for you! You are no innocent. How about: "See Cheryl, you good buddy Lynnie didn't run away and hide because of mean old me and Mary, she was just marshalling her forces preparing for her "devastating final blow" - ROTFLMAOWTIME. SO here she is, back to edify the group with her insights and wit. Now everybody, who is glad and grateful that "Mommy Dearest" is back? Come on, show of hands, who's happy to see the nasty bitch back again? Anyone? Hello? " The truth is, I killfiled you for months and you kept it up along with your little scumbag tapeworm cybercat (at the time she was posting as "Mary"). Eventually I started reading your sh.t when I got hits when searching for my and DS's names - I got fed up and started fighting back. You can't rewrite history no matter how hard you try, Lori. Anyone who was around at that time knows the truth. -L. > > *YOU* chose to lie on this group quite publicly - now you want me to email > > you privately to defend myself against those lies?? No thank you - post [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Besides which, you show your a.s constantly without us having to see > pictures of all that nasty fat!" That little gem came from cybercat when she posted as "Mary S.". Typical of her demeanor. > or maybe > > "...I hope Jonathan doesn't get a URI or the adoption agency > may be getting a call - right Mommy Dearest? " > > Do those posts ring a bell? That one belongs to Lori. -L. > > " What's the matter Lynnie? Doesn't Will stick up for you? Or is he > > ashamed to be married to such a fat scumbag? And I'm sure you wouldn't [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > That little gem came from cybercat when she posted as "Mary S.". > Typical of her demeanor. Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "CatNipped" <lcr...@houston.rr.com> Newsgroups: rec.pets.cats.health+behav Subject: Re: No San Diego Home for Conan (bad words used) Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 08:49:15 -0500 There was so much crossposting going on then, it is easy to get confused over who wrote what, but I am pretty sure this was her post. Sherry > > > " What's the matter Lynnie? Doesn't Will stick up for you? Or is he > > > ashamed to be married to such a fat scumbag? And I'm sure you wouldn't [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.ne t!not-for-mail > From: "CatNipped" <lcr...@houston.rr.com> > Newsgroups: rec.pets.cats.health+behav [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > There was so much crossposting going on then, it is easy to get > confused over who wrote what, but I am pretty sure this was her post. If indeed CN made this post, that means that your dear friend Lyn is justified in attacking her every post in anecdotes? What you call "retribution?" Bullshit. Your brain is addled. Or you may have started out stupid. In any case, if you are going to stir the sh.t, make sure you have your facts straight. > What I mean is, making reference to a "stalker" (and everybody knows > who she is referring to) was not necessary to convey the message she [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > rrphb back when Catnipped was attacking Lyn, her weight, her child, > etc. etc. then called the police on her. Cybercat called the cops - not Lori. Just FTR. > Retaliation is what CN is dealing with now, and it sucks when it comes > to roost in your own back yard. > All I am saying, really, is that if you don't want to be flamed, > post-humped, or whatever you call it, don't throw in little innuendos > and between-the-lines accusations. Thank you. -L. >> What I mean is, making reference to a "stalker" (and everybody knows >> who she is referring to) was not necessary to convey the message she [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Cybercat called the cops - not Lori. Just FTR. Thank you for setting the record straight. I'm not claiming to be totally blameless - I was flaming too and it's not pretty no matter who does it. I'm just trying to stop it - I'm sick of the nastiness and bitterness. I've learned the hard way that there are a lot more important things in life than one-upmanship on UseNet. >> Retaliation is what CN is dealing with now, and it sucks when it comes >> to roost in your own back yard. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Thank you. > -L. I won't do it again no matter what you decide to do. But, as I said, I'd rather we both just end it. Even if we're never friendly to each other, I would hope we could just ignore each other's posts and not snipe - if not for ourselves, then for the people here who have to read it. Lori > >> What I mean is, making reference to a "stalker" (and everybody knows > >> who she is referring to) was not necessary to convey the message she [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > > Lori Please send me an email. I want to discuss this with you privately without rehasing old ground. Email in the header is good - or idontmind (at) gmail.com. Thanks, -L. > > I honestly don't know whether you realize it or not, or whether it's > > deliberate or not, but you really could avoid the volatile and [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > What? There is nothing antagonizing about this. I don't understand this > post at all. Which part of this is volatile? There is not anything antagonizing about it. Sherry is just playing her usual "bored housewife stirring the sh*t" game. >> I don't feel safe enough here any more (due to my stalker) to post why, >> but [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > Sherry Because that would have been a mis-statement. The fact is that this used to be a safe haven of friends - a soft place to fall when someone was hurting. It's not anymore, and that's due to a few people who respond to the most innocuous posts (that have *nothing* to do with themselves) by spewing filth and hatred, and trying their hardest to hurt someone down to their very core - even to the extent of using their children and grandchildren as targets for their filth. This goes beyond a simple flame war - it has been taken into real life, and that is, literally, frightening. There was at least one person who was forced to leave this group because filth, pornography and threats were emailed to her *YOUNG CHILDREN*!!!!! I wasn't trying to be volatile or antagonizing - I didn't name anyone. If anyone assumes that it was themselves I was talking about, well, why would they if they had not been guilty of doing exactly what I said? Most people simply responded to my request with purrs (and again, thank you all - I really needed the support yesterday). Tell me something, Sherry, you chided me for just alluding to someone - and accused me of being volatile and antagonizing. Where were you when that someone was spewing very specific and hateful filth at me (not just allusions, but forthright attacks)? When did you ever fault someone else for what was done to me???! You're right there, Johnny-on-the-spot, when it comes to faulting me, but curiously absent when someone else is at fault. Again, I'm not carrying on a flame war - I'm doing my very best to ignore even the most provocative attacks. But neither will I lie to, or keep silent from, or be bullied into leaving a group of friends that I love. There have been a few people here with whom I've had disagreements, and even harsh words. I've made appeasements and have mended fences with all of them - I don't like wallowing in hatred. There have been many times I've been in the wrong - I'm certainly nowhere near perfect - but I've made apologies and amends, not excuses. I've even made appeasements with you, over and over again, when you've said some *really* nasty things about me *without cause* (except that you mistook me for someone else and accredited to me the things they wrote - even though I pointed out to you your mistake time and again) *and* without my retaliation. I've done everything in my power to keep this a civil and friendly group. Some people just won't accept that, and there's is nothing I can do about that except decry the loss of my safe place to fall. SignatureHugs, CatNipped See all my masters at: http://www.PossiblePlaces.com/CatNipped/ > Tell me something, Sherry, you chided me for just alluding to someone - and > accused me of being volatile and antagonizing. Where were you when that [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > CatNipped Sigh. All I am saying is that if you truly do want to stop the post-humping or "stalking" as you call it, word your posts so that you don't make constant reference to that very thing. "Poking with a stick", if you will. CN, you are not the innocent victim here. In your heart of hearts, I think you know that. You said as equally awful things to Lyn as she said to you. There are other forums that *are* members-only. Yahoo groups and such are still a safe place, more so than public usenet anyway. I wouldn't ever consider rpca "safe", not as long as the whole world can access it and posts are archived forever anyway. Sherry > Because that would have been a mis-statement. What Sherry posted as an example would have been the truth and would have served the same purpose. There is no need to fan the fires, Lori. >The fact is that this used to > be a safe haven of friends - a soft place to fall when someone was hurting. > It's not anymore, and that's due to a few people who respond to the most > innocuous posts (that have *nothing* to do with themselves) by spewing filth > and hatred, and trying their hardest to hurt someone down to their very > core - Or merely responding to things that are posted as they see fit. I have no control over how you feel about what I post. I am merely expressing my viewpoint. >even to the extent of using their children and grandchildren as > targets for their filth. Just as you targeted my son. Doesn't feel so good, does it? Like I said before, f.ck with the cub, get Momma Bear. > This goes beyond a simple flame war - it has been > taken into real life, and that is, literally, frightening. Not by me. ]>There was at > least one person who was forced to leave this group because filth, > pornography and threats were emailed to her *YOUNG CHILDREN*!!!!! Not by me. > I wasn't trying to be volatile or antagonizing - I didn't name anyone. Please. f.cking please. Everyone knows to whom you were referring. Stop being such an a.s. > anyone assumes that it was themselves I was talking about, well, why would > they if they had not been guilty of doing exactly what I said? I did not assume. It was all too clear to whom you were referencing especailly since your friend cybercat used the phrase "stalker Lyn" in this ng not two days before. Most people > simply responded to my request with purrs (and again, thank you all - I > really needed the support yesterday). [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > for what was done to me???! You're right there, Johnny-on-the-spot, when it > comes to faulting me, but curiously absent when someone else is at fault. Maybe she sees it as deserved pay-back - as many others do as well. You are not well liked by everyone, Lori. There are many who "loathe" you. > Again, I'm not carrying on a flame war - I'm doing my very best to ignore > even the most provocative attacks. But neither will I lie to, or keep > silent from, or be bullied into leaving a group of friends that I love. No one is doing anything of the sort. You simply will not accept any reply to your posts which don't shine sugar up your a.s. If you don't want people replying with their true thoughts, or calling you on your lies and inconsistenceis, then don't lie and don't post to an open forum. This is an open, unmoderated forum. Freedom of speech is alive and well. Maybe Yahoo Groups is more of what you are looking for - or a support group for depression, or whatever. You seem to think this is your own private group therapy or something. It's not; it's Usenet - the virtual street corner. > Some people just won't accept that, and there's is nothing I can do about > that except decry the loss of my safe place to fall. Have you ever apologized to me for making hateful statements about my weight, my son, my parenting skills, my advice (all which you really have no clue about at all, in reality)? What about entire threads you have created in order to flame me? Have I ever done that to you? No, I have not. The only thing I have "done" to you, Lori, is I have responded to what you have posted. That's all. Yes, most of it is negative because I find much of what you post ridiculous. That is all I have ever "done" to you. -L. Do you mean an on-line stalker? If so, shame on the sad bxxtard, I hope he/she/it rots. Hope you feel better soon, you've had a really tough year - hope the New Year is much better for you. Marcia and Otis xx > I don't feel safe enough here any more (due to my stalker) to post why, but > I'm dealing with a *bad* bout of depression this morning. Any spare purrs [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > CatNipped >I don't feel safe enough here any more (due to my stalker) to post why, but >I'm dealing with a *bad* bout of depression this morning. Any spare purrs >you might have would be greatly appreciated. Never any 'spare' purrs for you - only special heavy duty ones are available - all you need to do us ask. So the gang here is sending heavy duty purrs south from Oklahoma. Oh and since I just got home not long ago, the gray crew (two of the neighborhood outside kitties who are usually here to greet me when I get off work) are sending purrs, too. SignatureSteve Touchstone, faithful servant of Sammy, Little Bit and Spot with loving memories of Rocky (RB) stouchst@JUNKsirinet.net [remove Junk for email] Home Page: http://www.sirinet.net/~stouchst/index.html Cat Pix: http://www.sirinet.net/~stouchst/animals.html |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.