Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / Cat Anecdotes / December 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Cat In Trouble - Woman Arrested

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
CatNipped - 01 Dec 2005 17:07 GMT
A woman dialed 911 here in Houston when her cat was trapped in a drain.
They wouldn't send out anyone to rescue the cat so the woman (a single
mother) called 911 again and this time said, "My 2-year-old baby is trapped
in a drain" (note: her cat's name *IS* "Baby" and he's 2).  They sent
rescuers out and since they were already there they did deign to rescue the
cat.  But today a warrant has been issued for the mother and she will be
arrested for submitting a false report to police.  She faces up to 100 days
jail time and some hefty fines.

Bah!  Humbug!!!

Hugs,

CatNipped
No More  Retail - 01 Dec 2005 17:16 GMT
I would not worry about it HSUS, ASPCA and the media will get involved and
tear up that police department
>A woman dialed 911 here in Houston when her cat was trapped in a drain.
> They wouldn't send out anyone to rescue the cat so the woman (a single
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> CatNipped
jmcquown - 01 Dec 2005 17:27 GMT
> A woman dialed 911 here in Houston when her cat was trapped in a
> drain. They wouldn't send out anyone to rescue the cat so the woman
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> CatNipped

IDIOTS... our cats *are* our babies.

But on the flip side... (there is always a flip side)...
I worked with a woman who owned 5 cats.  She constantly used them as a
reason not to come to work.  Had to take cat#whatever to the vet.
Cat#whatever escaped and she had to find him/her.  She tripped over
cat#whatever on the stairs and had to go to the doctor.  You get the
picture.

She finally got fired and came back to get her personal stuff from her
cubicle *in the company of the police* (who rolled their eyes) saying she
"Didn't feel safe" going to the office without an escort.  Huh.  We aren't
talking an abusive ex- here, we are talking a former EMPLOYER.  Did she
think we were going to beat her?  Keep her from getting her belongings?  How
silly was this?

After that, she started calling her former office telephone number and
leaving obscene messages for the poor new guy who inherited her old phone
number.  He was shocked.  He played the messages for us on speaker and when
we heard her voice we all said, "OMG, that's ***!"  We used our phone system
software to burn the messages to a CD as evidence in case she did something
really nutty later on.

Anyway, last time she was ever seen/heard of by any of us, she was on the
local news.  Still had her 5 cats and was living in a cheap motel that
rented by the month (sad) but one of her cats got out and got trapped in a
drainage pipe.  She expected the landlord of the property to dig up the
drain pipe to get the cat out.  The landlord might well have done so if
she'd asked nicely, but given the fact that she was a lunatic, I doubt she
asked nicely.  She was probably shrieking at the guy.  So instead she called
the news.  When they ran the story, she looked nuts and they portrayed her
as such, which isn't what she was going for.

Sadly, I don't know if they got the cat out... I suspect they did, hopefully
after they hauled her in for a psych evaluation and arranged for the care of
her other 4 cats.  I *do* know she shouldn't be allowed to have cats.

Jill
Houston Legal Secretary - 02 Dec 2005 04:56 GMT
> But on the flip side... (there is always a flip side)...
> I worked with a woman who owned 5 cats.  She constantly used them as a
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> She finally got fired ...

Well that kind of behavior goes on in offices all across America and the
people doing it don't get fired.  Except it's not their pets they are taking
to the doctor, tripping over or looking for. It's ... THE CHILDREN.
Meanwhile, those of us who are child free have to pick up the slack at work.

Face it, an errand is an errand, whether you are taking your pet to the vet
or your kid to the dentist.  I look the other way when Sarah down the hall
calls in because her kid's sick and the day care won't take him.  She can
look the other way when my cat needs to go to the vet.

</rant>

And accept my apologies for hijacking this thread.

HLS
jmcquown - 03 Dec 2005 22:15 GMT
>> But on the flip side... (there is always a flip side)...
>> I worked with a woman who owned 5 cats.  She constantly used them as
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> HLS

No problem... I've experienced that too often over the years as well.  One
woman at my last job was notorious for getting a phone call after lunch
saying she needed to go get her daughter for some reason.  How convenient;
sure, take the rest of the afternoon off. <snort>

At this place of employ, it was a lovely custom on the day before a major
U.S. holiday, the office would shut down at 1PM.  At one point several years
ago, the dept. manager decided someone needed to stay behind on the days we
closed early to deal with emergencies.  We rotated those days among the
department staff.  But then it came time for K* to stay behind on Christmas
Eve.  K* had children.  I didn't.  So it was *strongly suggested* I might
switch with him and get to leave early the day before Independence Day the
next year instead, since I don't have children.

The implication was, I don't have children so I can't possibly have plans.
What if he would rather leave early in July to go on a picnic or something?
He liked to take his kids camping.  K* told me he didn't care either way,
but management pressured me so I said okay.  Didn't want to look like the
bad gal here.  But inside, I was seething.  To me it was all very
descriminatory against people without children.

(stepping off soapbox)

Jill
Enfilade - 04 Dec 2005 01:01 GMT
> The implication was, I don't have children so I can't possibly have plans.
> What if he would rather leave early in July to go on a picnic or something?
> He liked to take his kids camping.  K* told me he didn't care either way,
> but management pressured me so I said okay.  Didn't want to look like the
> bad gal here.  But inside, I was seething.  To me it was all very
> descriminatory against people without children.

I haven't minded teaching a few classes for my supervising professor
because he's got kids, one of whom was hospitalized for a week in
October.  I don't mind picking up the slack when he's rushing his kid
to the hospital.

But I certainly hope he'd be as sympathetic if I had to rush my cat to
the vet.

**

I personally believe that things like dentist appointments and such
should be scheduled at times where they don't interfere with school, or
at the very least at times when a working parent can make prior
arrangements (like a day off, or have a friend or relative pick up the
kid, take them to the appointment, and return them to school, or if
their partner doesn't work 9-5 Mon-Fri, then they shoudl be the one
taking the kid to the appointment) to do it so that it does not
interfere with their work schedule.

--Fil
Jo Firey - 04 Dec 2005 05:50 GMT
"Enfilade" <decepticoncommand@hotmail.com> wrote in message

> I personally believe that things like dentist appointments and such
> should be scheduled at times where they don't interfere with school, or
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> --Fil

As a practical matter, if all the children who have two 9 to 5 working
parents were to do this, just what are the pediatricians and children's
dentists supposed to do with the rest of their day?

In the real world children's parents often work.  And employers and
co-workers really do need to get used to the idea.

That said, if you schedule far enough ahead, you can often get 8am
appointments for routine things and just get to work a bit later.  It causes
less disruption for most jobs than leaving mid day or early.

And don't forget 9 to 5 is usually more like 8 to 5 plus overtime and a
commute both ways.  If you don't allow people some flexibility they are
gonna go nuts.  Whether its for kids or cats or just a pedicure once in a
while.

Jo
Cheryl Perkins - 04 Dec 2005 11:11 GMT
> As a practical matter, if all the children who have two 9 to 5 working
> parents were to do this, just what are the pediatricians and children's
> dentists supposed to do with the rest of their day?

<G> Right.

I really think it's not a case of cats or children, it's a case of adults.
Adults sometimes need a bit of flexibility in their work for medical
appointments or similar things and some adults, given a little
flexibility, will take off regularly at the busiest time of day at their
job to get their hair done.

I try to be in the group that, if possible, schedules medical and vet
appointments (and haircuts!) during my off hours, or take annual leave
time, approved in advance. But sometimes I've needed a bit of flexibility.

To be honest, almost everyone I've ever worked with has had children, and
a great number of them have had pets, and I've encountered very few who
took advantage of that for time off. And the ones who did, I strongly
suspect, would have done exactly the same thing if they hadn't had
children or pets. They'd just have needed another excuse. I have to take
the car to the garage. I've got an awful headache (that always hits me on
Fridays at noon) etc.

Mind you, if someone had pressured me to give up my Christmas Eve break
because someone else had children, I'd have pretended not to get the hint.
But if I'd been asked by the parent as a favour to switch, I'd probably
have gone along with the request as long as I hadn't already made a
committment for that time. It's all in how these things are approached.

Signature

Cheryl

Cheryl - 06 Dec 2005 00:32 GMT
> I really think it's not a case of cats or children, it's a case
> of adults. Adults sometimes need a bit of flexibility in their
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> take annual leave time, approved in advance. But sometimes I've
> needed a bit of flexibility.

Same here. I picked a vet that has evening hours, and Dr appts for
myself are scheduled at the earliest they can get me in. That said,
there was a several month period of time when my cat Shadow had a
feeding tube and his first week with it I took leave because he was
so sick and I would have lost him then if I didn't. After I went
back to work, my boss was flexible enough (and it helps that she's
an animal lover) to let me go home at lunch time (an hour commute
each way) to feed him, and even still leave about 1/2 hour early to
get home in time to feed him again.  This went on for 2 months!
Plus, weekly vet appointments to check his progress, and a couple
of emergencies.

[...]

> Mind you, if someone had pressured me to give up my Christmas
> Eve break because someone else had children, I'd have pretended
> not to get the hint. But if I'd been asked by the parent as a
> favour to switch, I'd probably have gone along with the request
> as long as I hadn't already made a committment for that time.
> It's all in how these things are approached.

It's a tough one. Everyone's time is precious. With "kids
holidays" such as Halloween - I've covered for co-workers with
younger kids so they can go home early and do their make-overs.
It's for the kids!  :)

Signature

Cheryl

Enfilade - 04 Dec 2005 21:17 GMT
> As a practical matter, if all the children who have two 9 to 5 working
> parents were to do this, just what are the pediatricians and children's
> dentists supposed to do with the rest of their day?
>
> In the real world children's parents often work.  And employers and
> co-workers really do need to get used to the idea.

Most of the people I know do not work 9-5 Monday to Friday.

When you work evening or night shifts, you invariably have daytime
free, and since you would get at least one night off a week, you can
stay awake longer, do your errands when the sun is out, and have the
evening to sleep.

When you work weekends, you get at least one weekday off work.

When you are self-employed, your hours are more flexible.  You can
start work after your errands and work longer into the evening.

When you work part-time, you have time available between 9 and 5 at
/some/ point of the week.

Ideally, these people would take their appointments 9-5 Mon-Fri,
allowing those people who DO work 9-5 Mon-Fri to have the few Saturday
and after-hours slots available.

--Fil
Cheryl Perkins - 04 Dec 2005 21:23 GMT
> Most of the people I know do not work 9-5 Monday to Friday.

But how common is this? I don't think I know anyone who doesn't work some
variation of regular hours (9-5, 8-4, + overtime etc) if you don't count
people I meet *because* they work shifts, like store clerks. I don't know
anyone who is self-employed - no, that's a lie, I know two people, but one
by the nature of her work is pretty tied to the usual working hours, and
the other alternates between being off all the time, and working all the
time.

Signature

Cheryl

Enfilade - 04 Dec 2005 23:12 GMT
> > Most of the people I know do not work 9-5 Monday to Friday.
>
> But how common is this?

Hmm, I don't know.  I really don't know what the percentage of 9-5 vs
odd hours is.

If there is a large majority working 9-5, then I'm willing to concede
that there woudln't be enough evening and Saturday appointments and
people would HAVE to take days off or half-days off to go to
doctor/dentist/etc.

Looking at my family:

Mother:  worked 9-5 Mon-Fri until retirement
Father:  self-employed
Mother in law:  shift work
Father in law:  self-employed
Brother in law 1:  works night shifts
Brother in law 2:  works some Saturdays and Sundays, getting weekdays
off work
Best friend:  Works 9-5 but Thurs-Mon, having all Tues and Weds off
work
University best friend:  shift work
High school best friend:  Works some saturdays and sundays, getting
weekdays off
Grade school best friend:  Works part-time
Husband of GS best friend:  Self-employed

Out of the 11 people I know best, only one works 9-5 Mon-Fri.

Of course, that doesn't mean most of society, just my
circle...explaining my opinon, which I'll gladly concede should it NOT
reflect most of society.

--Fil
Jo Firey - 04 Dec 2005 23:52 GMT
>> > Most of the people I know do not work 9-5 Monday to Friday.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
> --Fil

Just one comment then I'm going to drop out of this conversation as I'm
getting more argumentative than I feel.

If you live in an area that doesn't have "rush hour" every morning and
afternoon, than you are not typical of a lot of the country.  If you do,
that should serve as some evidence of the number of people that do work
"regular hours"

Jo
Enfilade - 05 Dec 2005 00:38 GMT
> If you live in an area that doesn't have "rush hour" every morning and
> afternoon, than you are not typical of a lot of the country.  If you do,
> that should serve as some evidence of the number of people that do work
> "regular hours"

I certainly apologize if I did hit any nerves.  That wasn't my
intention.  I really /don't/ know how things are in many areas,
particularly America, as I grew up in a very rural area of Canada.

I certainly think people need to put their children before their job if
their children are seriously ill.  And I understand that it is not
always possible to get appointments outside of 9-5 hours, and that some
people (like single parents or when both parents are working 9-5) have
to take time off work to go to those appointments.

But I've also been greatly annoyed by people who schedule appointments
at their convenience and don't give a damn about others who are relying
on them, when those things are not emergencies.

--Fil
Enfilade - 04 Dec 2005 21:24 GMT
> Most of the people I know do not work 9-5 Monday to Friday.

I will however say this--I do have sympathy for parents who have to
take their kids out of school to go to appointments during the day
because that is the only time they can take them, ie, if they work most
evenings and weekends and the kids are in school Mon-Fri.

My parents were very strict about not allowing me to miss school.  My
mom got angry at my cadet squadron commander because I was supposed to
lead teh squadron at Remembrance Day and she didnt' want me out of
school.  I finally was allowed to lead the squadron, but my dad picked
me up after and took me right back to school (while the rest of the
squadron had a party).

--Fil
badwilson - 05 Dec 2005 03:39 GMT
>> Most of the people I know do not work 9-5 Monday to Friday.
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> --Fil

Isn't Rememberance Day a day off school?  I always did the cadet thing
on that day but never missed any school because of it.  Maybe it's
different in BC.
--
Britta
"There is no snooze button on a cat who wants breakfast." -- Unknown
Check out pictures of Vino at:
http://photos.yahoo.com/badwilson click on the Vino album
Enfilade - 05 Dec 2005 12:24 GMT
> Isn't Rememberance Day a day off school?  I always did the cadet thing
> on that day but never missed any school because of it.  Maybe it's
> different in BC.

Not in Ontario.  The province figured that most kids used the day off
to goof off instead of going to ceremonies; therefore, it stopped being
a day off, and instead the morning was devoted to ceremonies and the
afternoon was regular classes.  Also in Ontario, all the stores etc.
are open on Nov 11.  I know it used to be a day off, but that was
before my recollection (ie, they changed it by at least 1983.)

--Fil
Jane - 05 Dec 2005 17:21 GMT
>but management pressured me so I said okay.  Didn't want to look like the
>bad gal here.  But inside, I was seething.  To me it was all very
>descriminatory against people without children.
>
>(stepping off soapbox)

As I used to tell my bosses:  You mean I'm being cheated because *I*
know how to use *birth control*???  

heehee

Jane
wafflycat - 01 Dec 2005 17:27 GMT
>A woman dialed 911 here in Houston when her cat was trapped in a drain.
> They wouldn't send out anyone to rescue the cat so the woman (a single
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> CatNipped

Quite. Have to say in UK, the fire brigade would have attended to get cat
out.

Cheers, helen s
No More  Retail - 01 Dec 2005 17:56 GMT
Firefighter here will respond but only if there is no emergency in progress.
I would be contacting a lawyer and the media and heads would roll

>>A woman dialed 911 here in Houston when her cat was trapped in a drain.
>> They wouldn't send out anyone to rescue the cat so the woman (a single
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Cheers, helen s
EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) - 02 Dec 2005 03:40 GMT
>> A woman dialed 911 here in Houston when her cat was trapped in a drain.
>> They wouldn't send out anyone to rescue the cat so the woman (a single
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> Quite. Have to say in UK, the fire brigade would have attended to get
> cat out.

Some places in the U.S., too - but apparently Houston isn't
one of them!
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 02 Dec 2005 11:43 GMT
> A woman dialed 911 here in Houston when her cat was trapped in a drain.
> They wouldn't send out anyone to rescue the cat

Isn't this what Animal Control is for? They're usually a department of
the police. Or maybe they only deal with troublesome and threatening
animals? They were the folks who dealt with the pitbulls who attacked
Smudge. They were very slow in responding, and these were dogs that
could have presented a danger to people, especially children. So maybe
they wouldn't rescue a stuck cat, I don't know. Seems like there should
be municipal departments that are dedicated to such rescues, but as
with everything else, there's usually not enough money.

Joyce
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.